<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Ann Coulter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/ann-coulter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Hunting Liberals, President King, and Going Rouge</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Sportsmens Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Gaffney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rouge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Spooner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's Friday...and that means it is time for our weekly "Chaos Theory" installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of political topics ranging from the sublime to the sublimely absurd...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Friday&#8230;and that means it is time for our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221;  installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of  political topics ranging from the sublime to the <em>sublimely absurd</em>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and there are always plenty of links, <em>so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Representative Gregg Harper&#8217;s (R-MS) organization, the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus, has been recently called &#8220;<strong>bipartisan</strong>&#8221; by Senator Ben  	Nelson (D-NE).  When 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0910/get_to_know_a_congressman4.html"> asked by Polico&#8217;s reporter</a>, &#8220;<strong>What in the world does the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus do</strong>,&#8221; one might reasonably expect would be an answer along  	the lines of, &#8220;<em>we support the rights and interests of sportsmen, fishermen,  	and hunters, in Congress.</em>&#8220;  What one might <strong>NOT</strong> expect, was Harper&#8217;s  	response: &#8220;<strong>We hunt liberal, tree-hugging Democrats, although it does  	seem like a waste of good ammunition.</strong>&#8220;  Very nice&#8230;very  	responsible&#8230;<em>very</em> bipartisan.</li>
<li>Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN), known most for conspiracy  	theories verging on the truly bizarre, has declared that she will not run  	for the presidency in 2012.  Which makes sense&#8230;since she may not even  	be able to win re-election for the seat she currently holds, as the  	residents of her district have grown more than a bit weary of her  	embarrassing statements, and the negative attention they attract.   	However, Bachmann 	<a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/47697/bachmann-says-no-to-white-house-run-want-rep-steve-king-instead"> did provide an interesting recommendation</a> for who she thinks <strong>SHOULD</strong> run:   	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Representative Steve King (R-IA)</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;she&#8217;s recommending  	the man who brought us such hits as being 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/08/rep-steve-king-lone-vote_n_227866.html"> the only vote</a> against a resolution stating that it was wrong to use  	slaves to build our Capitol,  sponsoring his own resolution &#8220;<strong>recognizing  	the importance of Christians and the Christian faith</strong>,&#8221; and very recently  	stating that gay rights are a &#8220;<strong>purely socialist concept</strong>.&#8221;  Way to  	really think it through, Michele&#8230;he is a <em>winner</em>.</li>
<li>I guess Republicans just <strong>LOVE</strong> Twitter.  	<a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/blogtalk-twitter-and-the-gop/"> It&#8217;s also being reported</a>&#8230;that they love setting up fake Twitter  	accounts and webpages, where they pretend to be particular Democratic  	legislators and candidates.  They then use these fraudulent accounts to  	misinform and offend voters.  Twitter has caught on and is trying to  	close all the accounts being used by Republicans in this way.  I think  	I may know why they like Twitter more than actual blogs:  on Twitter  	nobody expects you to actually use <em>facts</em> and defend your position&#8230;you  	can get  	away with just blurting out a few words of nonsense.</li>
<li>The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee 	<a href="http://dscc.org/gopplan">has put out an ad</a>, claiming that  	Republicans have wasted over 1,000 hours in the Senate, through exploitation  	of parliamentary rules and procedures.  The DSCC does little to show  	how they arrived at this figure&#8230;but I would guess that much of what the  	GOP has fought for in Congress also qualifies as a waste of time.  <em>Need  	examples?</em> This clip, a spoof on the iPhone commercials, has been  	making the internet rounds, and I think it nicely sums up the kinds of  	platforms and positions the GOP is using to distract our attention, delay  	progress, and otherwise hinder real issues from being addressed:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I">www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>A Telling List:</strong> Want to see clips of the &#8220;<em>Top Ten Distortions  	Perpetrated By FOX News?</em>&#8220;  Well look no further than 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/the-ten-most-egregious-fo_n_327140.html"> this link</a>.  It includes such highlights as accusing an Obama czar  	of condoning statutory rape, editing a clip of Joe Biden quoting John  	McCain&#8230;so that it appeared as if Biden said the quote, editing a clip of  	Barack Obama so it appeared that he supported a European-style health care  	system&#8230;when he was actually opposing the idea, <strong>AND</strong> directly repeating,  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">verbatim</span>, GOP talking points as if they were news.  <em>Enjoy</em>&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 1:</strong> A Hollywood charity is mounting a push to  	encourage more Americans to volunteer.  Since Obama has also supported  	volunteerism as important, Glenn Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/glenn-beck-slams-obama-en_n_326632.html"> could only imagine one thing</a>:  That Obama is using Hollywood&#8230;<em>to  	turn us into Communist China</em>.  No, I&#8217;m serious&#8230;here&#8217;s what he said: &#8220;<strong>Celebrities  	are coming together to make it cool to volunteer. Disney gives you a free  	day at the park. This is all fine, but doesn&#8217;t it seem a little bit  	convenient that all of this comes out now at the same time the Obama  	administration is calling for it? Obama controls the message through the  	media he holds in his pocket. Or in his little hand. And soon if you  	disobey, he&#8217;ll just go [Beck slaps his hand]. Now the message will be  	embedded in television shows. Isn&#8217;t this great? Aren&#8217;t you proud of what  	we&#8217;re doing? Oh, this certainly is change.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 2:</strong> Why is it that every time I write about  	something Glenn Beck said, I feel the need to also say, &#8220;<em>No really&#8230;that&#8217;s  	what he said?</em>&#8220;  Well, Beck was busy this week providing more ammunition  	for whomever is filling out the civil commitment papers on him, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/glenn-beck-smears-progres_n_327860.html"> claiming</a> that progressives/liberals&#8230;<em>wait for it</em>&#8230;have historically  	tried to take away everyone&#8217;s individual liberties, and could also be called  	&#8220;<strong>tyrants</strong>&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>slave holders</strong>.&#8221;  &lt;&lt;Sigh&gt;&gt;&#8230;</li>
<li>Neocon Frank Gaffney has claimed in the past that Obama was some sort of  	&#8220;s<em>ecret Muslim</em>,&#8221; that there is evidence connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and  	the Oklahoma City bombing (<em>there isn&#8217;t, of course, and shame on you if you  	didn&#8217;t know that</em>), that Sarah Palin learned foreign policy just by <em>living</em> in  	Alaska, that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (<em>but that the  	media hid this &#8220;fact&#8221; from us</em>), and that Democratic officials who criticized  	former President George W. Bush&#8230;should be hanged.  I tell you all  	this&#8230;so it will be of no surprise that Gaffney has no more decency than he  	has sense.  In a recent appearance on Hardball with Chris Matthews, he  	told Ron Reagan&#8230;<strong>that his father would be ashamed of him:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>John Stossel of the FOX Business Channel recently condemned Lou Dobbs&#8217;,  	of CNN, for Dobb&#8217;s ongoing &#8220;<strong>rants about immigrants wrecking America.</strong>&#8220;   	Dobbs has now responded, and rather unkindly: &#8220;<strong>Fox Business News  	- their new hire John Stossel -- weighing in  		with his own brand of myopic idiocy and no information whatsoever sat  		down with self-described rodeo clown Glenn Beck…what a self-important  		ass</strong><strong>…He doesn’t understand basic economics…He’s just a silly  	little trick waiting to do some sort of Libertarian flip&#8230;Immigrants wrecking America  	-  I’ve never said anything close to that.  		As a matter of fact, I embrace immigrants to this country, I welcome  		them, I want more -- and as a matter of public policy, we need them. </strong> <strong>In no way am I restrictionist, and to hear this ass continue his  		act over at Fox News. I just can’t wait until he starts blowing bubbles  		in the air -- that’s about all he’s equipped to do.</strong>&#8220;   	That&#8217;s right Lou, you never said the &#8220;<em>immigrants are wrecking America</em>&#8220;&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">except  	the time</a> you accused them of bringing leprosy here&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">or the  	time</a> you claimed they were forming a conspiracy to take back their old  	national territory&#8230;oh, and 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/"> remember the time</a> you said they were a threat to the entire middle  	class, and working people everywhere?  Dobbs&#8230;before you start trying  	to play &#8220;<em>friend to the immigrant</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>holier than thou</em>&#8221; with John Stossel&#8230;you  	might want to watch some your own clips on YouTube.</li>
<li>How better to wrap up the &#8220;<em>Media Gone Wild</em>&#8221; segment of the post, than  	with an Ann Coulter item.  During her appearance on Joy Behar&#8217;s talk  	show, she stated that all Presidential assassins have been liberals: &#8220;<strong>As  	I have not only witnessed in my own life but described in &#8216;Guilty&#8217;, every  	presidential assassination or attempted presidential assassination was  	committed by some kind of left-wing loon, communist, anarchist,  	communitarian, or they had no politics at all.</strong>&#8220;  Behar attempts to  	point out that this statement is indefensible and patently false&#8230;but Ms.  	Coulter has never been the one to stop talking so that someone else can  	point out <strong>HOW WRONG SHE IS</strong>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>COURTESY OF THE PENTAGON AND THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Apparently, there are at least 220 detainees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval  	Prison&#8230;which have been found to have had no ties to terrorism, 9/11, or to  	pose any other kind of threat to the United States&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>but we&#8217;re still keeping  	them in prison</strong></span>.  The Supreme Court 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/guantanamo-uighurs-rights_n_327027.html"> is preparing to look at this problem</a>&#8230;yet another in a list of how  	Bush&#8217;s use of the military prison conflicts with seemingly <strong>EVERY</strong> aspect of  	Due Process listed in our Constitution.  <em>A reminder:</em> the  	base/prison is technically &#8220;<em>American soil</em>&#8221; and the Constitution does not say  	that it applies only to &#8220;<em>citizens</em>&#8221; but rather to all &#8220;<strong>persons</strong>.&#8221;  On a  	related note, a group called <em>New Security Action</em>, with the support of a  	number of retired generals and other veterans, 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYN6yeRWYbI&amp;feature=player_embedded"> has released a series of ads</a> pointing out that Congress should step  	aside and allow Gitmo, which has come to represent nearly everything wrong  	about the Bush-Cheney way of thinking, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">to be closed</span>.</li>
<li><strong>No surprise:</strong> Turns out the Pentagon was engaged in a highly  	organized program to sell the American people on the Iraq War and other Bush  	security policies.  <strong>Big surprise:</strong> Well&#8230;it wasn&#8217;t so much an &#8220;<em>ad  	campaign</em>&#8221; or a &#8220;<em>public relations program</em>&#8220;&#8230;as it was 	<a href="http://rawstory.com/2009/10/bryan-whitman-2/">a series of  	psychological experiments</a> being performed on the American citizenry.   	<strong>Bonus surprise:</strong> One of the chief architects of this program?  He  	still works at the Pentagon in the same position.  Scully&#8230;Mulder&#8230;<em>where  	are you when we need you?</em></li>
<li>Most people were a bit surprised at the unmitigated gall of the 30  	Senate Republicans who voted against Senator Franken&#8217;s (D-MN) bill, which  	would punish government contractors if they tried to keep employees from  	reporting rape.  Turns out, <em>they&#8217;ve got company</em> -- the Defense  	Department 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/defense-department-oppose_n_326569.html"> also doesn&#8217;t like the bill</a>&#8230;because they would hate to have to do  	without KBR, Blackwater, and other companies that threaten/coerce/bribe  	victims of rape to be silent.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Amidst all the talk about a &#8220;<em>public option</em>,&#8221; few are paying  	attention to a development almost as big.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/senate-dems-aim-to-strip_n_328362.html"> Democrats are very close</a> to being able to strip away the anti-trust  	exemption given long ago to the health insurance companies, which has  	allowed them to behave as a monopoly.  Want to know why this is so  	important?  We know how the free market is <strong>SUPPOSED</strong> to  	work&#8230;but when a company is allowed to monopolize an industry or a region,  	then there is no competition to force the company to have fair pricing and  	offer good service&#8230;which leads to our situation today where the health  	insurance companies have high rates, giant profits, deny service, and  	mistreat customers.  Also&#8230;<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/health_competition_map.html">check  	out this map</a>.  <strong>Yes, it&#8217;s disgusting:</strong> most states&#8217; residents, 	<strong>RIGHT NOW</strong>, only have <strong>ONE</strong> or <strong>TWO</strong> insurers that they are 	<strong>ALLOWED</strong> to choose from.  &#8220;<em>Free Market Capitalists</em>&#8220;&#8230;are  	you listening?</li>
<li>First it was &#8220;<em>fat babies</em>.&#8221;  Then it was &#8220;<em>thin babies</em>.&#8221;   	Then it was &#8220;<em>spousal abuse</em>.&#8221;  What new excuse for denying  	coverage did we find out about now?  Yup&#8230;insurance companies, almost  	all of them, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/insurance-companies-rape-_n_328708.html"> will not allow you to purchase a policy</a> with them if you have been  	treated for <strong>RAPE</strong>.  To them&#8230;it&#8217;s just another &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>The push for the public option is in full swing, and polls show it is  	working.  More of the public supports it each day, the House is within  	about <strong>EIGHT</strong> votes of being able to pass it, and we heard the 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/23/reid-is-only-one-or-two-v_n_331652.html"> surprising news</a> today that the Senate may be within <strong>TWO</strong> votes.  	<em>Seriously</em>: <strong>TWO VOTES</strong>.  Here&#8217;s a new ad, featuring Heather  	Graham, explaining why the option is necessary:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70">www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Interesting fact courtesy of Representative Anthony Weiner (D-NY):</span> <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/10/23/weiner-calls-gop-opponents-public-option-give-up-their-medicare"> 55 of the Republicans</a> opposing the public option because it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>government-run</em>&#8221;  	or &#8220;<em>socialism</em>&#8220;&#8230;they&#8217;re currently <strong>ON</strong> <strong>MEDICARE</strong>.   	Weiner says, &#8220;<strong>Even in a town known for hypocrisy, this list of 55 Members  	of Congress deserve some sort of prize. They apparently think the public  	option is ok for them, but not anyone else.</strong>&#8220;  Yes, indeed.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GAY RIGHTS&#8230;OR THE LACK THEREOF:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wow</strong>:  It&#8217;s rare that someone actually <strong>ADMITS</strong> that their argument  	against gay rights and/or gay marriage is hollow and baseless.  Ross Douthat,  	conservative columnist for the New York Times, was asked while sitting on a  	panel for &#8220;<em>young, bright, neo-cons</em>&#8221; what he thought about gay marriage.  	<a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/media/n1-panel-cat-got-douthats-tongue-topic-gay-marriage"> His response</a>:  &#8220;<strong>I am someone opposed to gay marriage who is  	deeply uncomfortable arguing the issue in public.</strong>&#8220;  He explained  	that his reason for feeling &#8220;<strong>uncomfortable</strong>&#8221; discussing the subject,  	was because his argument against it is purely religious, and that it  	therefore represents &#8220;<strong>a losing argument.</strong>&#8220;  He even went so far  	as to recognize that because he is embarrassed that he has no real, factual  	objection to gay marriage&#8230;and because he is embarrassed to say what his  	objection really is&#8230;perhaps that means he needs to change his position and  	support gay marriage.  <em>Wow.  Again&#8230;wow.</em></li>
<li>Related to the previous item, a mailing sent out in Maine is attempting  	to persuade residents of the state to vote &#8220;<em>Yes</em>&#8221; in the upcoming ballot item  	to prohibit gay marriage.  The reasons that it proposes? I happen to  	have FiveThirtyEight.com&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/10/arguments-against-gay-marriage.html"> summations of the reasons</a>&#8230;first, the mailing claims that the new law  	permitting gay marriage &#8220;<strong>won&#8217;t make gay marriage equal to straight  	marriage. Instead, it will create a new kind of marriage in which gay people  	and straight people are equal.</strong>&#8220;  Well, besides not making much  	sense&#8230;that&#8217;s certainly not going to &#8220;<em>stir up</em>&#8221; too many people.   	The second reason it offers: &#8220;<strong>&#8230;we may not have proven any connection  	between gay marriage and public education, our opponents haven&#8217;t disproven  	the connection, and it&#8217;s their fault that the subject came up.</strong>&#8220;   	Impressive&#8230;that doesn&#8217;t really say anything, does it.  I mean, it  	sounds like it&#8217;s saying something&#8230;but then it just&#8230;doesn&#8217;t.  And  	third, the mailing offers that, &#8220;<strong>if gay marriage is upheld, then marriage  	will exist solely to make people happy.</strong>&#8220;  Well,  	it&#8217;s hard to see how that&#8217;s true&#8230;would gay people marrying suddenly make  	heterosexual marriages &#8220;<em>meaningless</em>&#8221; and about nothing more than &#8220;<em>happiness</em>?&#8221;   	And hell, I know some people who will tell you that marriage has nothing to  	do with happiness at all&#8230;I&#8217;m sure they were just kidding&#8230;</li>
<li><em>Meet Philip Spooner:</em> Want to hear a86-year-old  	man&#8230;lifelong Republican&#8230;and WWII veteran who fought on D-Day&#8230;defend  	gay marriage with all his heart?  <em>Yeah, me too:</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Despite the calls from Republicans that protecting gay Americans was the  	equivalent of protecting practitioners of  <em>pedophilia, bestiality,  	and necrophilia</em>&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/22/hate-crimes-bill-approved_n_330702.html">the  	new Hate Crimes Bill has passed</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The Nation, a well-known progressive magazine, 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28609.html">is publishing</a> a &#8220;<em>companion piece</em>&#8221; to Sarah Palin&#8217;s new book, &#8220;<em>Going Rogue</em>.&#8221;  It&#8217;s  	titled &#8220;<em>Going Rouge</em>&#8221; and features an almost identical cover, to match the  	almost identical title.  Some conservatives have complained that this  	might lead to some people purchasing The Nation&#8217;s book by mistake.   	Perhaps they&#8217;re right&#8230;seeing as both books will likely be placed next to  	each other on a shelve in the &#8220;<em>Humor</em>&#8221; section&#8230;and due to the fact that  	many of the people seeking Palin&#8217;s book might not know how &#8220;<em>rogue</em>&#8221; is  	properly spelled.</li>
</ul>
<p>That about wraps it up for this week in Reality Liberation.  Have a  wonderful weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Grayson&#8217;s Charge, Sex Clinics, and the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Behar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shepard Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the weekly "Chaos Theory" edition of the RLF blog...where I quickly attempt to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition of the RLF blog&#8230;where I quickly attempt  to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the  week.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Most people hadn&#8217;t heard of Representative Alan Grayson (R-FL)  	before&#8230;but they have <span style="text-decoration: underline;">now</span>.  In a wonderful, congressional, &#8220;<em>oh,  	no you didn&#8217;t</em>&#8221; moment&#8230;Grayson laid out in simple terms the terrible  	truth about the Republicans on Health Care Reform:  tens of thousands  	of Americans are dying because they don&#8217;t have insurance&#8230;and the  	Republicans have offered <strong>NOTHING</strong> but opposition to changing  	this&#8230;therefore, they must just want people to just &#8220;<em>not get sick</em>&#8221;  	and if they do&#8230;they should &#8220;<em>die quickly:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco">www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course, the Republican backlash to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/alan-grayson-republicans_n_303996.html"> Grayson&#8217;s statements</a> was fast and furious, and they demanded an  	immediate apology, comparing what Grayson did to the actions of Senator Joe  	&#8220;<em>You Lie!</em>&#8221; Wilson&#8230;despite the fact that the two events have nothing  	in common, especially in terms of congressional procedures and policies  	regarding decorum.  Grayson&#8230;complied, <em>but not in the way the GOP  	expected</em>:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/grayson-not-backing-down_n_305196.html"> he apologized</a>, not to the GOP, but to the dead and the dying and to  	their families&#8230;he apologized for Congress allowing this to happen.   	So far, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/pelosi-grayson-shouldnt-a_n_306338.html"> Pelosi has backed Grayson</a>, along with the rest of the Democrats&#8230;and  	now some 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/dems-taunt-gop-wheres-you_n_307560.html"> Democrats seem to be realizing</a>: &#8220;<em>Wait a minute&#8230;the GOP really <strong> HAVEN&#8217;T</strong> offered a plan&#8230;we should point that out!</em>&#8220;  No kidding  	guys&#8230;that one was a gimme.</li>
<li>Want the very definition of &#8220;<em>out of touch?</em>&#8220;  House Minority  	Leader John Boehner (R-OH)&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1009/Boehner_searching_for_first_public_option_backer.html?showall">says  	nobody has ever approached him</a> supporting the public option and he  	therefore doesn&#8217;t think most people support it.  Ummm, John&#8230;the  	majority of people in <strong>YOUR STATE</strong> support it&#8230;the <strong>VAST</strong> majority of the 	<a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693"> people in the country</a> support it and 	<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-HealthcareReform/idUSTRE58T0MY20090930"> would be willing to pay higher taxes to pay for it</a>&#8230;and unless you,  	Snowe, and some of the Democratic Senators who voted against it in the  	Senate Finance Committee realize that the majority of your constituents want  	it&#8230;well, there will be obvious political consequences come reelection  	time.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator David Vitter (R-LA) 	<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/60699-prostitution-complaint-filed-against-vitter"> has some new problems</a>&#8230;stemming from his old problems.  It&#8217;s been  	very odd to watch a Senator, busted for soliciting prostitutes, question the  	morality of Democrats and claim that he and other southern Republicans are  	the ones representing &#8220;<strong>true values.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps he mistakenly  	believed that the scandal was behind him&#8230;well, &#8220;<em>not so</em>&#8221; says the  	Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel.  Apparently (<em>who knew?</em>),  	soliciting prostitutes just might violate the State&#8217;s laws regarding  	professional misconduct for a lawyer.  The law states that lawyers may  	be charged with misconduct and subsequently disbarred if they &#8220;<strong>commit a  	criminal act especially one that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty,  	trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.</strong>&#8220;  Ooops.</li>
<li>The Health Care bill contains a provision for health clinics to be  	established in schools, since studies show that access to health services  	can greatly increase academic performance.  This gave Representative  	Michele Bachmann (R-MN) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/bachmann-sex-clinics-will_n_306292.html"> all that she needed</a> to formulate a new &#8220;<em>anti-reform</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theory.  Bachmann tells us&#8230;that these would actually be &#8220;<strong>sex  	clinics</strong>&#8221; where kids could go to get <strong>ABORTIONS</strong> without their  	parents knowing about it: &#8220;<strong>The bill goes on to say what&#8217;s going to go on  	-- comprehensive primary health services, physicals, treatment of minor  	acute medical conditions, referrals to follow-up for specialty care &#8212; is  	that abortion? Does that mean that someone&#8217;s 13 year-old daughter could walk  	into a sex clinic, have a pregnancy test done, be taken away to the local  	Planned Parenthood abortion clinic, have their abortion, be back and go home  	on the school bus that night? Mom and dad are never the wiser.</strong>&#8220;  Of  	course&#8230;Michelle only read item (II) under section 2511 of the bill&#8230;if  	she had bothered to read item (I) RIGHT BEFORE IT she would have known that  	the bills says: &#8220;<strong>SBHC services will be provides in accordance with  	Federal, State, and local laws governing-- (I) obtaining parental or  	guardian consent; and (II) patient privacy and student records, including  	section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of  	1996 and section 444 of the General Education Provision Act;</strong>&#8220;  Your  	choice: bad reader&#8230;or just a liar?</li>
<li>Governor Sanford of South Carolina&#8230;having been asked by both his  	fellow Republicans and his constituents to resign over his actions regarding  	the abandonment of his duties to pursue an illicit affair&#8230;<a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/965644.html">now  	asks that the state ethics panel doesn&#8217;t release its findings</a>.  <em> I wonder why</em>.  Hear that sound?  It&#8217;s the sound of Sanford&#8217;s  	fingernails dragging across the State of South Carolina&#8230;clinging on like  	grim death so that he can stay in office <em>for just a little bit longer</em>.</li>
<li>The &#8220;<em>Republican</em>&#8221; brand name?  	<a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/assessing_the_gop_brand.php">Not  	doing so hot</a>&#8230;and given the types of things I&#8217;m reading and posting  	each week, this should surprise <strong>NO ONE</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA:  PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity is so consistently wrong in terms of his facts and  	historical data, that Jon Stewart was able to dedicate almost a third of one 	<em>Daily Show</em> episode&#8230;just to pointing out Hannity&#8217;s <strong>RECENT</strong> mistakes.  I submit this clip for your enjoyment and edification:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Bernard Goldberg, a media critic, usually appears on FOX shows&#8230;to <strong> DEFEND</strong> the network against the constant stream of accusations that they  	have an obvious, right-wing bias.  So&#8230;you can imagine that people  	were a bit shocked to see him appearing on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor, and  	saying&#8230;that in many ways, FOX is to be held responsible for creating this  	perception, especially when it does things like &#8220;<em>promoting</em>&#8221; Tea Party  	protests rather than simply &#8220;<em>reporting on</em>&#8221; Tea Party protests:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Once again, Shepard Smith, host of FOX&#8217;s &#8220;<em>The Fox Report</em>&#8221; has  	chosen to speak the truth rather than simply parrot the talking points.   	On a recent segment, a guest tried to levy criticisms at the current Health  	Care Reform proposals&#8230;by pointing out that Canada&#8217;s single-payer system is  	less than perfect.  Shepard is quick to point out that it seems like a  	false and deceptive comparison, since <strong>NONE</strong> of the bills in Congress  	propose a single-payer system.  When Shepard&#8217;s guest then tries to  	create a classic &#8220;<em>straw man</em>&#8220;/&#8221;<em>slippery slope</em>&#8221; argument&#8230;Shepard  	wasn&#8217;t going to allow that either.  <strong>Good for you Shep:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/sen-graham-calls-beck-a-c_n_306434.html"> at a recent discussion</a> in front of powerful Washington &#8220;<em>movers and  	shakers,</em>&#8221; came right out and said that the &#8220;<em>birther</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theorists are &#8220;<strong>crazy</strong>,&#8221; that Obama is certainly not a &#8220;<em>closet  	Muslim</em>,&#8221; and that Glenn Beck &#8220;<strong>is not aligned with any party. He is  	aligned with cynicism and there has always been a market for cynics. But we  	became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a  	great nation because we are a nation of believers.</strong>&#8220;  Wow&#8230;could  	there finally be a Republican who might realize that the votes you get from  	siding with the extremists&#8230;<strong>ARE NOT WORTH IT</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OLYMPIC FLAME&#8230;FIZZLES:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Even after President Obama flew to Denmark to make the case for the 2016  	Summer Olympics to be held in Chicago&#8230;<a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/33138973/ns/sports-olympic_sports/">the  	prize went to someone else</a>.  In a shocking turn of events, Chicago  	didn&#8217;t even make it past the first round of voting&#8230;Tokyo would fall in the  	next round&#8230;and at the end Rio de Janeiro won over Madrid the right to host  	the games.</li>
<li>In a display that can only be described as exceedingly puerile,  	conservative commentators/columnists including RedState&#8217;s Erick Erickson,  	Michelle Malkin, and Rush Limbaugh have been, quite literally, <strong> CELEBRATING</strong> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/conservatives-revel-in-ob_n_307794.html"> the fact that America will not be hosting the 2016 games</a>&#8230;simply  	because it allows them to claim that &#8220;<em>Obama failed at something.</em>&#8220;  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">That&#8217;s right:</span> Conservatives are <strong>CELEBRATING</strong>, during an  	economic crisis, that America will <strong>NOT</strong> get the projected $22 billion  	in revenues, the 315,000 new jobs, and the $11 billion in new income that  	those jobs represent.  They&#8217;re willing to cheer against the best  	interests of the country&#8230;if it means a &#8220;<em>failure</em>&#8221; for the President.   	Remember this, when listening to these same people discuss Health Care  	Reform, or anything else:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">these people would rather America suffers</span>&#8230;as  	long as it denies Obama check in the &#8220;<em>win</em>&#8221; column.</li>
<li>While the President was unable to convince the voting members of the IOC  	to permit the games to be held in America&#8230;top White House Advisor David  	Axlerod is correct at saying 	<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/02/axelrod-blames-chicago-loss-on-ioc-politics/"> there is more involved</a> than the President&#8217;s charm.  It&#8217;s a well  	established fact that the IOC is an extremely political body, and that its  	voting process often produces unexpected results.  In recent years, the  	IOC has come under increasing pressure to allow the games to be hosted in a  	country <strong>OTHER</strong> than the United States, the nations of Europe, and the  	countries comprising Asia&#8230;and preferably a South American country.   	Given this pressure, the decision to hand the honor over to Rio de Janeiro,  	Brazil&#8230;<em>starts to make more sense</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PALINWATCH -- HOW CAN WE MISS HER IF SHE WON&#8217;T GO AWAY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Politico&#8217;s recent polls suggest that ex-Governor Sarah Palin 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/palinmap/index.html">is not well regarded  	among her fellow Republicans</a>, Republican advisors 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/mccain-campaign-manager-p_n_307523.html"> consider her to be</a> &#8220;<em>electoral poison</em>,&#8221; and many of her former  	supporters either tired of her during the Levy/Bristol business, or don&#8217;t  	respect her resigning the governorship before completing her term&#8230;but 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26236.html">there is  	still a demographic</a> that absolutely <strong>LOVES</strong> her:  Evangelical  	Christians, and Republicans living in small, country towns&#8230;and of course, 	<strong>there&#8217;s some overlap between those two groups</strong>.  I don&#8217;t think I  	even need to say anything else on the subject&#8230;draw your own conclusions.</li>
<li>The New York Post reports that Palin&#8217;s new career as a &#8220;<em>highly paid  	speaker</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/sarah_lectures_tough_sell_Z6eKRnldUitBmiOfXCBjlI"> is not going so hot</a>&#8230;perhaps due to the limited number of people (<em>mentioned  	in the previous item</em>) who still think she&#8217;s &#8220;<em>bright</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>adorable</em>.&#8221;   	In fact, one industry expert told the Post: &#8220;<strong>The big lecture buyers in  	the US are paralyzed with fear about booking her, basically because they  	think she is a blithering idiot&#8230;Palin is so uninteresting to so many  	groups -- unless they are interested in moose hunting.  What does she  	have to say? She can&#8217;t even describe what she reads.</strong>&#8220;  And as with  	the previous item&#8230;I really can&#8217;t think of anything that I need to add to  	that.</li>
<li>In a surprise move&#8230;perhaps due to her inability to book speaking gigs  	at $100,000 a pop&#8230;it was announced that 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090928/ap_on_en_ot/us_books_palin"> Palin&#8217;s memoir would be released</a> November 17, which is four months ahead  	of schedule.  The announcement regarding the book&#8217;s title generated  	even more surprised looks: &#8220;<strong>Going Rogue -- An American Life.</strong>&#8220;  It  	seemed strange to some&#8230;that Palin would want to reference &#8220;<em>going rogue</em>,&#8221;  	as it was a comment that McCain campaign insiders made referring to how  	Palin&#8217;s off-book, off-message, inconsistent, and completely unprepared  	remarks were <strong>TANKING MCCAIN&#8217;S PRESIDENTIAL BID</strong>.  In other  	words&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">it wasn&#8217;t meant as a compliment</span>.  Pre-orders for the  	book 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/09/30/palin-already-a-bestselle_0_ws_304937.html"> suggest very brisk sales</a>, causing some on the left to ascribe to a  	conspiracy theory that conservative groups and churches must be buying up  	the books in large numbers to increase the sales figures.  In  	reality&#8230;people just need to realize that not everybody who buys the book  	necessarily admires Sarah Palin&#8230;many will get it just for the likely  	entertainment value, the same way millions of people each day go out on  	YouTube and watch people ride bicycles into walls, fall off skateboards, and  	slip and fall while dancing.</li>
<li>Want a good laugh?  Here&#8217;s Ann Coulter, appearing on Joy Behar&#8217;s  	new show on CNN&#8230;asserting that the effect of Sarah Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>death panel</strong>&#8221;  	tweet shows that Palin is &#8220;<strong>a powerful woman</strong>&#8221; and that people listen  	to her because she is so &#8220;<strong>coherent</strong>.&#8221; Joy&#8230;took particular exception  	to the &#8220;<em>coherent</em>&#8221; part.  Many more excepts may be viewed 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxdq9PUQtTg">here</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember Valerie Plame?  The undercover CIA agent whose identity  	was leaked to the press after her husband criticized the Bush  	administration?  Remember the Bush administration agreeing to &#8220;chat&#8221;  	with investigators, but not on the record or under oath&#8230;and how Scooter  	Libby was eventually &#8220;<em>volunteered</em>&#8221; to take the fall for leaking the  	information, despite the fact that conventional wisdom suggested it was Vice  	President Cheney&#8217;s idea?  Thursday, a federal judge, against the wishes  	of both the Bush and Obama administrations, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/cheney-fbi-interview-must_n_306329.html"> ruled that the FBI&#8217;s notes of their interview</a> with Cheney must be  	publicly released.  This could be embarrassing&#8230;on the upside, if  	Cheney&#8217;s statements are embarrassing/incriminating enough, maybe he&#8217;ll  	finally stop appearing on talk shows.  <em>Fingers crossed&#8230;</em></li>
<li>Just last week, I was criticizing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for  	not being assertive enough, in terms of getting Senate Democrats to do  	what&#8217;s right and not &#8220;<em>what&#8217;s best for insurance companies.</em>&#8220;   	Apparently, Reid <strong>HAS</strong> grown enough of a backbone to send letters to  	President Obama and Secretary of Defense Gates&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/reid-appeals-directly-to_n_305784.html">asking  	them to finally step up</a> and lend their support to the fight to repeal  	the military&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell</strong>&#8221; policy, which is causing  	highly trained interpreters, war heroes, technical experts, and other brave  	soldiers/sailors/airmen, to be discharged from the armed services&#8230;just for  	being gay.  Reid wrote, &#8220;<strong>As Congress considers future legislative  	action, we believe it would be helpful to hear your views on the policy,&#8221; he  	writes. &#8220;Your leadership in this matter is greatly appreciated and needed at  	this time</strong>,&#8221; and then goes on to include stories of highly valuable and  	distinguished soldiers being discharged under the policy.  Obama has  	voiced his opposition to both DADT and DOMA (<em>The Defense of Marriage Act</em>)&#8230;but  	so far his administration has done more to squelch challenges to the various  	anti-gay rights policies and laws, than it has done to repeal them.  At  	a minimum, they should be lending their support to Senator Kirsten  	Gillibrand (D-NY), who has been fighting the good fight in the Senate.</li>
<li>Turns out that the Secret Service&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33120229">investigation of the Facebook  	user</a> who created a poll asking if the President &#8220;<strong>should be killed</strong>,&#8221;  	has identified a juvenile as the perpetrator.  No charges will be  	filed&#8230;but many are missing the obvious topic for discussion:  while  	the poll may not have represented a viable threat to the President, doesn&#8217;t  	it say something when the tone of our national discourse has become <strong>SO</strong> irrational, <strong>SO</strong> violent, <strong>SO</strong> hateful&#8230;that a child asks such a  	terrible question?  Glenn, Michelle, Rush, Sean, Ann, Bill, and  	others&#8230;<em>won&#8217;t you please think of the children?</em></li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s all from the Reality Liberation Front for this week -- have a good  weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition:  3300 Lobbyists, Death Panels Dead, Octomom Returns</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-3300-lobbyists-death-panels-dead-octomom-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-3300-lobbyists-death-panels-dead-octomom-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end-of-life counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezekiel Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix the Cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investor's Business Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[militias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nadya Suleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niall Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octomom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reille Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Murkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[town halls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's Friday, and that means it is time once again for the "Chaos Theory" edition of the RLF Blog...where I round up all the articles that I wasn't able to get to during the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Friday, and that means it is time once again for the &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221;  edition of the RLF Blog&#8230;where I round up all the articles that I wasn&#8217;t able  to get to during the week.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got lots of material on several different topics, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">so let&#8217;s just get  started!</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HELP WANTED AT THE RLF:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Always wanted to enter the glamorous world of blogging?  We here at  	the Reality Liberation Front would like to help you.  The RLF is  	currently looking for bloggers to join us.  <strong>The only requirements:</strong> your writing must be <strong>INFORMED</strong>, display the consistent use of <strong>LOGIC</strong> and <strong>REASONING</strong>, and should follow the best practices regarding  	spelling, grammar, punctuation, et cetera.  Other than that, we would  	welcome bloggers on any subject (<em>ie. politics, world news, entertainment,  	technology, health&#8230;</em>), and you may post as often as you like (<em>daily,  	weekly, monthly, ad hoc</em>).  Just use the contact link on the  	homepage to communicate your interest, and we will work with you to set it  	up.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HERE&#8217;S TO YOUR HEALTH:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Here&#8217;s the short and sweet:</strong> back in the 2003 Medicare  	prescription drug bill, Republicans 	<a href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/08/13/oh-those-death-panels/"> supported a portion of the bill</a> that would allow doctors to be  	reimbursed from Medicare for giving end-of-life counseling to patients who  	wanted to learn more about their medical rights and options (<em>ie. hospice,  	DNR orders, requesting treatment or meds, refusing treatment or meds, living  	wills&#8230;</em>).  In 2008, Sarah Palin 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/13/palin-deathpanel-flipflop/"> endorsed a similar measure by proclamation</a> on &#8220;<em>Healthcare Decisions  	Day</em>&#8221; in Alaska.   In the current bill, Senator Johnny Isakson  	(R-GA) 	<a href="http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/08/death-panel-architect-a-pro-life-republican-from-georgia.html"> co-sponsored a section</a> calling for all such counseling to be reimbursed  	by insurance.  But&#8230;then a health care lobbyist decided to tell the  	public that this provision would <strong>force euthanasia</strong> on seniors&#8230;and  	then Palin <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26078.html"> chimes in</a> that it is the equivalent of a &#8220;<strong>death panel</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and then  	Chuck Grassley (R-IA) 	<a href="http://iowaindependent.com/18456/grassley-government-shouldnt-decide-when-to-pull-the-plug-on-grandma"> backs up</a> the &#8220;<strong>pulling the plug on grandma</strong>&#8221; claim&#8230;and then 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/coburn-backs-death-panel_n_258946.html"> Senator Tom Coburn</a> (R-OK) further supports the preposterous &#8220;<strong>pulling  	the plug on Grandma</strong>&#8221; idea.  So many people started protesting the  	imaginary &#8220;<em>death panels</em>&#8220;&#8230;that they have now pulled the counseling  	reimbursement from the bill.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>That&#8217;s right:</strong></span> the  	loudest, dumbest, most ill-informed segment of the population just gave the  	insurance companies millions in savings&#8230;and took millions out of the  	pockets of our seniors, because now if they want to talk to their doctor  	about what their rights and options are&#8230;<strong>THE SENIORS</strong> have to pay for  	it.</li>
<li><strong>Thanks for Trying:</strong> Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) at least  	attempted to bring reason to the debate.  At a large gathering she  	denounced Sarah Palin&#8217;s tactics: &#8220;<strong>It does us no good to incite fear in  	people by saying that there&#8217;s these end-of-life provisions, these death  	panels.  Quite honestly, I&#8217;m so offended at that terminology because it  	absolutely isn&#8217;t (in the bill). There is no reason to gin up fear in the  	American public by saying things that are not included in the bill.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>In an <em>Investor&#8217;s Business Daily</em> editorial, 	<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/08/how_stehpen_hawking_proves_tha.html"> the writer argued</a> that the proposed health care bill resembles the  	British system (<em>which it does not</em>), and that it is a good thing that  	the brilliant quantum physicist Stephen Hawking wasn&#8217;t raised in  	Britain&#8230;because he wouldn&#8217;t have received care: &#8220;<strong>People such as  	scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn&#8217;t have a chance in the U.K., where the  	National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of  	his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.</strong>&#8220;  Raise your hand  	if you see what&#8217;s coming&#8230;that&#8217;s right, Stephen Hawking <strong>WAS</strong> raised  	in the U.K., and 	<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/aug/12/birthers-stephen-hawking-paul-rowen"> he has responded</a> that, &#8220;<strong>I wouldn&#8217;t be here today if it were not for  	the NHS (National Health Service).  I have received a large amount of  	high-quality treatment without which I would not have survived.</strong>&#8220;   	The IBD has since removed the mention to Hawking from its column, and  	Britain&#8217;s health care system 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/british-health-system-hit_n_258418.html"> is starting to get tired of the lies</a> being spread about it.  They  	can make their point easily&#8230;their system outscores ours in almost every  	way.</li>
<li>Meet Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Obama&#8217;s chief-of-staff, Rahm Emanuel,  	and health advisor to President Obama.  On Sean Hannity&#8217;s <em>FOX News</em> show, Hannity proceeded to quote Ezekiel Emanuel, and then falsely claimed  	that the quote indicated that there were &#8220;<em>death panels</em>&#8221; in the bill.   	Guest Ann Coulter&#8217;s response?  She said, &#8220;<strong>Totally ironically, Zeke  	Emanuel is on my death list. Hold the applause. I&#8217;m going to be on the death  	panel.</strong>&#8220;  And so&#8230;yet another conservative makes jokes about  	killing a public figure.  Emanuel, who is actually fervently <strong>AGAINST</strong> euthanasia, and does not appreciate having his comments misrepresented, 	<a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1915835,00.html">is  	striking back</a>.</li>
<li>GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell&#8230;just 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/senate-republicans/gop-senate-leader-acknowledges-he-hasnt-read-full-health-care-bill/"> admitted that he has not read the health care reform bill</a>, but says that  	he knows enough about it, &#8220;<strong>saying it will put health care in the  	government’s hands, and create significant cuts to Medicare to pay the  	trillion dollar bill over ten years.</strong>&#8220;  That&#8217;s not good enough  	Mitch&#8230;read the bill, then complain about what&#8217;s actually <strong>IN IT</strong>, not  	about what you <strong>THINK</strong> is in it.</li>
<li>Want to know how badly the insurance companies don&#8217;t want this bill to  	pass?  	<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;sid=aqMce51JoZWw"> How about this</a>: &#8220;<strong>six lobbyists for each of the 535 members of the  	House and Senate, according to Senate records, and three times the number of  	people registered to lobby on defense. More than 1,500 organizations have  	health-care lobbyists, and about three more are signing up each day. Every  	one of the 10 biggest lobbying firms by revenue is involved in an effort  	that could affect 17 percent of the U.S. economy.</strong>&#8220;  That&#8217;s over  	3,300 lobbyists&#8230;working hard to make sure that your elected officials  	think of <strong>THEM</strong> before they think about what is good for <strong>YOU</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>IT&#8217;S THE ECONOMY, STUPID:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> recently surveyed 47 economists&#8230;<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111831339">most  	said the recession is over</a>, but there is much recovery to be done.   	I&#8217;ve said it before:  Huge mess&#8230;built over more than a decade&#8230;near  	economic collapse&#8230;recession over within a year.  Stop splitting hairs  	and just say, &#8220;<em>Thank you</em>.&#8221;</li>
<li>Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman says that stimulus spending  	by governments has 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/10/krugman-world-avoided-sec_n_255361.html"> saved the world</a> from a global depression and that all economic signs and  	indicators of export growth appear to be on the mend.  But he  	warns&#8230;recovery will likely take two years.  He also called for more  	government spending, and tighter global regulations.</li>
<li>Despite what the &#8220;<em>we&#8217;re becoming Russia!</em>&#8221; fearmongers are  	saying&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/14/income-inequality-is-at-a_n_259516.html">the  	rich are getting even richer</a> and the poor&#8230;even poorer.  Not only  	does the top one percent in America have almost all the money&#8230;but their  	income growth is growing 66% more than the incomes of the other 99%.  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>In short:</strong></span> the richest one percent has almost all the  	money, and is making more money even faster than ever before.   	Yeah&#8230;we really can&#8217;t tax the &#8220;<em>millionaires club</em>&#8221; to provide for  	health care reform&#8230;they&#8217;re <strong>OBVIOUSLY</strong> really struggling.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span>Representative John Sullivan (R-OK) 	<a href="http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/08/08/house-goper-cites-birther-claims-and-enemies-list-at-town-hall/"> recently held a town hall</a>&#8230;where he supported both the  	crazed/conspiratorial claims of the lunatic fringe that Obama is not a  	citizen, and that Obama is compiling an &#8220;<em>enemies list.</em>&#8220;  He  	said, &#8220;<strong><span id="ctl00_body1_art_lblArticleText">This is a scary time in  	Washington.  It&#8217;s a very frightening time. I see Barack Obama is  	creating an enemies list of people who oppose this miserable health care  	plan. I think that&#8217;s frightening. That&#8217;s from a guy that can&#8217;t even show a  	long-form birth certificate. I think we all ought to be prepared to fight  	that.</span></strong>&#8220;  And people wearing tinfoil hats around the country  	jumped up and down and turned up the banjo music.</span></li>
<li><span>Sources indicate that former senator and  	presidential candidate John Edwards 	<a href="http://www.wral.com/news/local/politics/story/5791651/">is about to  	admit</a> that the baby his former mistress, Rielle Hunter, gave birth to 18  	months ago&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>is his</strong></span>.  To anyone who has seen some of the  	pictures of the baby girl&#8230;<em>this is not much of a shocker</em>.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span><a href="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/hunterbaby.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="Reille Hunter Baby" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/hunterbaby.jpg" alt="" width="339" height="445" /></a><br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span>In April, Representative </span>Michele Bachmann  	(R-MN) tried to warn that Obama&#8217;s expansion of the AmeriCorps program, a  	volunteer community-service organization, was little more than &#8220;<strong>re-education</strong>&#8221;  	camps to turn our youth into Obama-following socialists.  She also said  	that, as a mother, she would not want her children to have anything to do  	with it&#8230;<em>wait for it</em>&#8230;<a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/53002167.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUgOy9cP3DieyckcUsI">what  	she didn&#8217;t know</a> at the time is that her son, <strong>HAD ALREADY SIGNED UP</strong>.   	Harrison Bachmann starts work with Teach For America, a division of  	AmeriCorps, shortly.</li>
<li>Liz Cheney, daughter (<em>and some say clone</em>) of former VP Dick  	Cheney, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/03/liz-cheney-slams-obama-on_n_250156.html"> criticized Obama</a> for diplomatic efforts with &#8220;<strong>enemy</strong>&#8221; nations, and  	saying that he should have more supportive of the &#8220;<strong>brave Iranian men and  	women</strong>&#8221; who protested the results of the Iranian election.  Umm,  	Miss Cheney&#8230;almost every foreign relations expert, and most Republicans,  	agree that Obama handled the situation perfectly&#8230;if the Iranian government  	even caught a whiff of the United States government publicly supporting the  	protests, they would dismiss the protests as being coordinated by us,  	instead of seeing them as legitimate displays of their peoples&#8217; discontent.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Financial Times&#8217; Niall Ferguson 	<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c24385ce-85ef-11de-98de-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1"> thought he&#8217;d make a rather strange comparison</a> between the President and  	an old cartoon character&#8230;it wasn&#8217;t received too well: &#8220;<strong>President Barack  	Obama reminds me of Felix the Cat. One of the best-loved cartoon characters  	of the 1920s, Felix was not only black. He was also very, very lucky. And  	that pretty much sums up the 44th president of the US as he takes a  	well-earned summer break after just over six months in the world&#8217;s biggest  	and toughest job.</strong>&#8220;  Yes&#8230;you heard him right.  He&#8217;s saying  	that Obama is like Felix the Cat&#8230;because they&#8217;re both &#8220;<em>black</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>lucky</em>.&#8221;</li>
<li>In a Wall Street Journal article, the authors 	<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125003045380123953.html">actually  	criticized</a> Obama for telling us the details of the health care reform  	plan: &#8220;<strong>You know, every president has to make a decision, you know, are  	you going to fly way up high and look down on policy at 30,000 feet, sort of  	like George W. Bush did, or are you going to get down into the weeds and  	sometimes run into the risk of micromanagement, like Jimmy Carter did.  	Barack Obama has kind of tended toward the weeds&#8230;.President Obama, not  	only does he want to hear about the unemployment rates &#8212; he wants to hear  	about the U6, the underemployment rate! A few weeks ago, they were talking  	about child obesity rates, and what to do about childhood nutrition. These  	things go into the weeds.</strong>&#8220;  I think we&#8217;ve recently experienced  	enough to show that the American people need <em><strong>MORE</strong></em> education  	and information&#8230;certainly not <em><strong>LESS</strong></em>.</li>
<li>First CNN host Lou Dobbs caught attention for supporting the inane &#8220;<em>birther</em>&#8221;  	conspiracy&#8230;and then he <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200908100049"> decided to follow it up</a> by calling DNC chair Howard Dean a &#8220;<strong>bloodsucking  	leftist</strong>&#8221; who should be killed with &#8220;<strong>a stake through his heart.</strong>&#8220;   	Dobbs has issued an &#8220;<em>almost apology</em>&#8221; for the latter incident: &#8220;<strong>I&#8217;m  	sorry if a Bram Stoker allusion is too literary for some, and for those who  	could not make what was seemingly an obvious connection, my deepest  	apologies and I&#8217;ll gladly withdraw the latter part of my remark.</strong>&#8220;   	It&#8217;s not a literary reference, Dobbs&#8230;it&#8217;s yet another irresponsible media  	figure advocating violence against a public figure.  Note:  The &#8220;<em>Lou  	Dobbs Foolish Remark Trifecta</em>&#8221; is now in play&#8230;.one to go&#8230;</li>
<li>Glenn Beck on FOX has called for armed insurrection against the  	government, warned of the end of the world, called the President a racist,  	compared the administration to Nazis, and recently joked about poisoning  	House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.  And now&#8230;his advertisers are leaving the  	show <strong>IN DROVES</strong>.  Stephen Colbert thought this might deserve  	treatment on his show:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:246560" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:246560" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MOB RULE:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Conservatives keep claiming that racism isn&#8217;t a part of these town hall  	protests&#8230;which they keep trying to label as mere &#8220;<em>energetic, democratic  	expression.</em>&#8221; They also like to claim that nobody is comparing Obama to  	Hitler or the Nazis. Well&#8230;what about the town hall where the <strong>COUNTY  	COMMISSIONER</strong> <a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/index.ssf/2009/08/hundreds_come_out_to_rally_in.html"> showed up with a sign</a> bearing a picture of Obama and a swastika?   	Or maybe the town hall where 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/12/rosa-parks-poster-torn-up_n_257578.html"> the picture of Rosa Parks</a> was torn down and destroyed?  Or how  	about the representative who held a town hall&#8230;only to find a swastika 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/11/scott-swastika/">painted on his  	office door</a> the next day?  Or the protest where 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/death-to-obama-sign-holde_n_258601.html"> a man was arrested</a> for carrying a sign that read &#8220;<em>Death to Obama?</em>&#8220;  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Face it:</strong></span> you have right-wing extremists among your  	ranks, some nothing more than domestic terrorists.  It&#8217;s time to clean  	house in the GOP&#8230;</li>
<li>Representative Rick Larsen (D-WA) 	<a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/cspanjunkie/ive-got-facts-my-side-youve-got-glenn"> might have said it best</a> at his recent town hall meeting: &#8220;<strong>With  	regards to the first comment about being forced to buy health care, I&#8217;ll say  	it again&#8230;The bill does not force anybody to buy health care&#8230;The bill  	does not force people to change their health care plan. If you&#8217;re in a plan,  	you will not be forced into the public option. You will not be forced into  	the health insurance exchange. </strong><strong>Now folks will say that&#8217;s not  	true, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">but I&#8217;ve got facts on my side and you&#8217;ve got Glenn Beck on your  	side</span>. It&#8217;s just not going to play out that way.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><strong>There Is A Relationship:</strong> The Southern Poverty Law Center is  	r<a href="http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=392">eporting a  	disturbing trend</a>&#8230;militia groups are 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-tv/roy-sekoff-discusses-the_b_258146.html"> swelling their ranks</a> with people either unhappy with the President&#8217;s  	race, or fearing that they will lose all of their liberties under this  	administration.  They are armed, training&#8230;and talking about the  	violent overthrow of our duly-elected government, which is as I have said in  	the past, <strong>ILLEGAL</strong>.  One such extremist attended the Obama town  	hall, and stood outside, with a loaded gun strapped to his leg, and a sign  	referring to Thomas Jefferson&#8217;s quote that the &#8220;<em>tree of liberty</em>&#8221; must  	be occasionally refreshed with the &#8220;<em>blood of tyrants.</em>&#8220;  Here,  	Chris Matthews interviews the extremist on <em>Hardball</em> and reveals that, 	<strong>like the other extremists</strong>, he cannot name any liberties that he has  	lost, cannot name one way in which the Constitution has been violated, nor  	can he provide any sane reason for his actions:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jiDWbtOh1kY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jiDWbtOh1kY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiDWbtOh1kY">www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiDWbtOh1kY</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>And lastly, on this subject, here&#8217;s Jon Stewart taking a look at the  	town hall mayhem on <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:240956" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:240956" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GHOSTS OF OUR PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>They&#8217;ve 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/12/us/12psychs.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;adxnnlx=1250276482-MB7LB33Rfy27chbv664l+g"> identified the two men</a> that the CIA turned to, in order to develop the  	U.S.&#8217;s interrogation program.  Neither one had ever performed an  	interrogation, but they&#8217;d done quite a few &#8220;<strong>mock</strong>&#8221; sessions based on  	the torture techniques used by the the Communist Chinese.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>That&#8217;s  	right:</strong></span> they used the torture methods that the Chinese used to  	force <strong>FALSE CONFESSIONS</strong>, instead of proven techniques to perform <strong> INTERROGATIONS</strong>.  There&#8217;s a big difference.  In the &#8220;<em>confession</em>&#8221;  	scenario, you just want the prisoner to say what you want him to say&#8230;.in  	the &#8220;<em>interrogation</em>&#8221; scenario, you want actual, reliable information.</li>
<li>New documents from the House Judiciary committee, 	<a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/issues_WHInterviews.html">verify  	what we already knew</a>:  The White House, through Karl Rove, asked  	the Justice Department to fire attorneys who wouldn&#8217;t look into bogus voter  	fraud claims that would benefit Republicans.  The same documents show  	also that when the Washington Post released an article about the political  	firings, two Bush staffers named Scott Jennings and Jane Cherry joked about  	it.  When Cherry asked &#8220;<strong>Good Lord, what have you done?</strong>&#8221; Jennings  	quipped, &#8220;<strong>Followed orders</strong>,&#8221; to which Cherry said, &#8220;<strong>Isn&#8217;t that what  	the Nazi&#8217;s claimed?</strong>&#8220;  Yes, Miss Cherry&#8230;<em>it is.</em></li>
<li>Former VP Dick Cheney is 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/12/cheney-memoir-former-vp-u_n_258201.html"> now complaining</a> that at some point, President Bush &#8220;<em>went soft</em>&#8221;  	and wouldn&#8217;t support Cheney&#8217;s decisions anymore.  Given that Cheney  	wanted to use American soldiers, on American soil, to illegally arrest  	American citizens&#8230;and that George Bush wouldn&#8217;t go along with the  	idea&#8230;maybe we finally have something we should thank Bush for.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The Human Clown Car Is Back:</strong> FOX 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/10/fox-orders-octomom-specia_n_255763.html"> has announced</a> that it will be airing a two-hour special on &#8220;<em>Octomom</em>&#8221;  	Nadya Suleman, with never-before-seen footage.  Meanwhile, FOX has  	released two clips to whet your appetite, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/octomom-i-screwed-myself_n_258794.html"> here</a>, one of which shows Suleman admitting: &#8220;<strong>I screwed myself.   	I screwed up my life, I screwed up my kids&#8217; lives&#8230;What was I thinking?</strong>&#8220;   	Thank you, Captain Obvious.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s all for now&#8230;have a wonderful weekend, and I&#8217;ll see you back on  Monday (<em>unless something I just can&#8217;t resist writing about pops up Saturday  or Sunday</em>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-3300-lobbyists-death-panels-dead-octomom-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

