<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Bill Frist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/bill-frist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Waterboarding Grandkids, Possum Meat, Nazi Golfers</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Castellanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Values Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Ratigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keep American Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcia Greenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF's weekly "Chaos Theory Edition" where we wrap up the remaining strange news items from the week.  Only four categories this week, but lots of links and clips.  Let's get started...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF&#8217;s  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; where we wrap up the remaining strange news  items from the week.</p>
<p>Only four categories this week&#8230;but lots of links, so <em>let&#8217;s get started</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>We&#8217;ve all been witness to the GOP&#8217;s recent &#8220;<em>enlightenment</em>&#8221;  	regarding the nation&#8217;s debt.  For the last eight years, while they held  	the reins of Congress, the rampant government spending was &#8220;<em>absolutely  	necessary</em>.&#8221;  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now:</span></strong> It&#8217;s the equivalent of kicking our  	grandchildren in the teeth.  Or, as Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma)  	recently put it, it&#8217;s the equivalent of &#8220;<strong>waterboarding</strong>&#8221; them.  	<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62973-its-coburn-vs-krugman-on-spending"> Coburn said</a>, &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;re going to waterboard them.  We&#8217;re going to  	flood them with debt.</strong>&#8220;  Senator Coburn was referring to a program  	funding the study of political science, which 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/08/coburn-political-science/"> Coburn claims is not necessary</a>&#8230;since people can learn all that  	they need to know about politics from <strong>CABLE NEWS</strong>.  It&#8217;s suddenly  	quite obvious where <strong>HE</strong> learned most of what <strong>HE</strong> knows  	about it&#8230;</li>
<li>It&#8217;s an established fact that Republicans have had some difficulty  	adjusting to the &#8220;<em>internet age</em>&#8220;&#8230;perhaps best displayed by the fact  	that most of them don&#8217;t seem to realize that if they say something that  	directly contradicts what they said one year ago, the clip of both  	statements will be on <em>YouTube</em> before the day is out.  Want to  	see a slideshow of the &#8220;<em>Top Nine Republican Internet Fails</em>?&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/republican-internet-fails_n_319574.html"> Here you go</a>&#8230;</li>
<li>The number one problem with allying oneself with a minority of loud,  	activist, ignorant, and unreasonable people&#8230;is that you suddenly lose the  	support of the much larger body of normal, moderate, sane folks.  Want  	to see what happens if you try to win the moderate people back by behaving  	like a reasonable human being, open to compromise and the good ideas of  	others?  Watch here as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) finds out what  	happens when the lunatics figure out that you are not really one of them:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Liz Cheney is not quite done fighting her father&#8217;s battles&#8230;no matter  	how many times she appears on discussion panels and is identified as having  	the foreign policy knowledge of a teenager.  Now 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28212.html">she has  	formed</a> the &#8220;<em>Keep America Safe</em>&#8221; organization, whose mission  	statement claims to support &#8220;<strong>an unapologetic approach to fighting  	terrorism around the world, for victory in the wars this country fights, for  	democracy and human rights, and for a strong American military that is  	needed in the dangerous world in which we live.</strong>&#8220;  Ms.  	Cheney&#8230;first of all, even if we look only at the fact that planes have not  	crashed into buildings this year, President Obama <strong>ALREADY</strong> has a  	better track record than your father had, in terms of keeping the country  	safe.  Secondly, Obama has succeeded in gaining international allies  	in the struggle against terrorists&#8230;allies that your father helped to  	alienate.  And third, well, I think the DNC put it best in their  	response: &#8220;<strong>Last fall, the American people overwhelmingly rejected a  	radical foreign policy authored by Dick Cheney that alienated our allies,  	emboldened our enemies, depleted our resources, distracted our focus and  	made the nation less secure. The Cheneys lost that debate and their approach  	was deemed a failure. The Cheneys can continue to focus on securing their  	sullied legacy if they want to. But, the President will continue to focus on  	securing the country.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Exactly</em>.</li>
<li>Retaining his crown as &#8220;<em>King of the Bizarre Analogy</em>,&#8221; RNC  	Chariman Michael Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/michael-steele-cow-on-the_n_321121.html"> said in a recent FOX interview</a> that he feels like&#8230;well&#8230;health care  	reform is a &#8220;<strong>train</strong>,&#8221; and President Obama is the conductor, and Obama  	is trying to get all the Republicans to get on board, and Steele sees  	himself as a &#8220;<strong>cow on the tracks.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Ok, sure.</em></li>
<li>I mentioned in a previous post, one way that you know that the GOP is  	focused on simply <strong>OPPOSING EVERYTHING</strong> is when a number of GOP  	legislators vote against Senator Franken&#8217;s first bill:  a bill <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> protecting rape victims</span>, working for companies with government  	contracts.  Here&#8217;s Jon Stewart, who points out what should be an  	obvious truth: &#8220;<strong>If, to protect Halliburton, you have to side against rape  	victims, you might want to rethink your allegiances.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>It recently came to light, in part because of the work done by the  	National Women&#8217;s Law Center, that in eight states, insurance companies can  	and do consider being the victim of spousal abuse a &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition</em>&#8221; that allows them to deny coverage.  State and  	Federal representatives from most of the eight states expressed immediate  	embarrassment and outrage over the situation, and most have already taken  	steps to remedy the matter. <strong>But not Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</strong>.   	When the president of the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, Marcia Greenberger, 	<a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_10_15/2009_10_15.html"> appeared before a Senate committee</a> to discuss the issue, Burr thought it  	appropriate to repeatedly interrupt and otherwise disrespect her:</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>:  If I could  get back to your question about the specific examples: they manifest themselves  in many different ways. For example, if a woman ends up in an emergency room  with cuts, bruises, broken arms, black eyes, typical injuries that result from  domestic violence, we know of instances where women are being denied insurance  coverage and neither the insurance company&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: My question&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;doesn&#8217;t view  that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;is specifically about  North Carolina&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;and I&#8217;m trying  to answer that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;and the insurance  commissioner tells me we haven&#8217;t had a case. We haven&#8217;t had anybody&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: Well, I&#8217;m trying  to explain. First, I think it&#8217;s great that he is now explicitly having a rule,  which as our report pointed out, didn&#8217;t exist before. So that&#8217;s really  excellent, because of the way insurance companies deal with this issue in  particular. They will often deny the coverage of victims and survivors of  domestic violence without saying that that&#8217;s the reason&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;I&#8217;m just going by  your report&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: You asked the  question about did we follow up and we did. </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: Well, I found more  information in my one call to North Carolina than I think your report did. </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Again?</em> Representative Bill Otto (R-Kansas) has obviously  	not been paying attention.  First he 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a video</a> on YouTube titled &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he raps (<em>and  	badly</em>) his various criticisms of President Obama, and about eating  	opossum, which he calls &#8220;<strong>the other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;  This obviously  	drew allegations of racism (<em>at a minimum it is childish, insensitive, and  	inane</em>), and eventually the clip was removed from the site.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/bill-otto-says-he-will-re_n_323686.html"> And now</a>&#8230;Otto says he&#8217;s going to repost the video, because it was his  	adult daughters who took the video down, and also because he fears that &#8220;<strong>People  	are going to think that this was done by people to shut me up.  I&#8217;m  	getting hate e-mails from Maryland to California, but, hey, that&#8217;s part of  	the game.</strong>&#8220;  Mr. Otto:  It&#8217;s not a <em>game</em>, it&#8217;s civil  	service and <strong>YOU</strong> are an elected official, <em>jackass</em>.  Next  	time, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">listen to your daughters</span>&#8230;and try to learn from the lessons of  	other, like the <strong>OTHER</strong> Kansas legislator who just recently got in a  	heap of trouble 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Kansas_Rep_GOP_needs_great_white_hope.html"> for saying</a> that the GOP is looking for a &#8220;<strong>great white hope</strong>&#8221; to  	defeat Obama.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Want the &#8220;<em>short version</em>&#8221; of the merry war between the White House  	and <em>FOX News</em>?  Here goes&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>WHITE HOUSE:</strong></span> FOX News <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/anita-dunn-fox-news-an-ou_n_316691.html"> serves as the propaganda arm</a> of the Republican Party.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BILL O&#8217;REILLY:</strong></span> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bill-oreilly-glenn-beck-d_n_318085.html"> Nuh uh</a>&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA MATTERS:</strong></span> Umm&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/fox_news_channel?tab=all">it&#8217;s  pretty obvious</a>, guys&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GLENN BECK:</strong></span> The administration is like the Nazis&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/glenn-beck-compares-fox-n_n_318784.html">and  we&#8217;re the Jews</a>!</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NEW STUDY:</strong></span> Not only is it true, but we found something  interesting:  Most of the anti-Obama forces aren&#8217;t particularly  racist&#8230;the only thing they have in common is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/gop-base-driven-by-bizarr_n_323796.html"> they all watch FOX News</a>, and because of this&#8230;<em>they believe some pretty  outlandish sh-t.</em></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s fun picking on CNN&#8217;s inability to both perform research and report  	news.  It&#8217;s especially fun&#8230;if you&#8217;re Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember the rather bizarre reactions from some members of the media  	when Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize?  Well, Rachel Maddow thinks it  	can all be explained by &#8220;<em>Obama Derangement Syndrome:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>By now you&#8217;ve heard that the Senate Finance Committee managed to pass  	the &#8220;<em>Baucus Bill.</em>&#8220;  You also heard that Republican Olympia Snowe  	(R-Maine) voted along with the Democrats to send the bill on.  And  	recently, 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33308113/ns/politics-health_care_reform/"> it may have come to your attention</a> that another Maine Republican,  	Senator Susan Collins, may also lend her support for the bill.  Well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/exclusive-moveon-whacks-f_n_318640.html"> MoveOn.org</a>, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal  	Employees, the AFL-CIO, and the Communications Workers of America would like  	to remind you:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/senate-health-bill-oppose_n_318920.html"> it&#8217;s a CRAPPY bill</a>, that would make a mountain of money for the  	insurance companies, would change little in the way they do business, and  	would <strong>NOT</strong> serve to get all of America&#8217;s uninsured the health care coverage  	that they need.  In fact&#8230;any <strong>OTHER</strong> House and Senate version  	might just be a better choice.</li>
<li><strong><em>Thank you, Captain Obvious:</em></strong> The most ridiculously  	unnecessary headline in health care reform news 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/13/AR2009101303472.html">comes courtesy</a> of <em>The Washington  	Post</em>:  &#8220;<strong>Health Insurers Emerge as Obama&#8217;s Top Foe in Reform  	Effort.</strong>&#8221; That&#8217;s right&#8230;.&#8221;<em>emerging</em>&#8220;&#8230;as if it weren&#8217;t  	always the case.</li>
<li>Think only our elected officials are in the pocket of the health  	insurance industry&#8230;but our stalwart media will be there to keep us  	informed of the truth regarding the health care debate.  <em>Maybe not.</em> CNN contributor, Alex Castellanos&#8230;has been 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140037">revealed</a> to be  	connected at the hip with America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (<em>AHIP</em>),  	the monolithic insurance lobby currently (<em>and ferociously</em>)  	campaigning to kill reform legislation.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t generally hear about &#8220;<em>progressive faith groups</em>,&#8221; but  	the <em>American Values Network</em> aims to change that.  They are 	<a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/healthcare/faces-ad/">currently  	releasing ads</a>&#8230;emphasizing the moral and religious arguments supporting  	heath care reform.  It&#8217;s not a difficult argument to make, and  	represents one of the best examples of &#8220;<em>fighting fire with fire</em>&#8221; that  	we have seen in a long time.</li>
<li>Is it obvious that former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has a new  	book out?  Not only has he been making the usual talk show rounds, but  	he also managed to inject a little sanity into the health care debate.   	Of right-wing assertions that the Obama plan represents &#8220;<em>socialized  	medicine</em>&#8221; and warrants comparisons to Britain, Canada, and France, Frist 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3tLHqGz7uE&amp;feature=player_embedded"> said on C-SPAN</a>, &#8220;<strong>What the Obama administration is doing is not  	socialized medicine.  Socialized medicine is where the government owns  	the hospitals, owns the doctors, and decides how people get paid.</strong>&#8220;   	Yes&#8230;thank you&#8230;<em>finally</em>&#8230;is everybody listening?</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>In Lakeville, Massachusetts, someone 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/10/13/swastika-obama-carved-int_ws_319331.html"> carved a swastika</a> and the word &#8220;<strong>Obama</strong>&#8221; into a golf course green.   	The course manager believes that someone used either a cleated golf shoe  	or some other tool to perform the vandalism.  Strange&#8230;one would certainly think  	that America&#8217;s golfers have had some extra time to get used to the idea of  	having a very popular, half African-American leader.</li>
<li><em><strong>NEW HERO:</strong></em> Dylan Ratigan hosts the &#8220;<em>Morning Meeting</em>&#8221;  	show on MSNBC, and lately has shown to be a tough, bright host&#8230;who knows  	how to play hardball.  In 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/dylan-ratigan-to-chamber_n_320397.html"> a recent interview</a> with Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S.  	Chamber of Commerce, Ratigan responded to Donohue&#8217;s attempts to claim that  	free, unfettered enterprise has the solutions to all problems by saying, &#8220;<strong>unless  	the government and people like you that lobby to the exemptions that allow  	banks to [speculate with taxpayer money] get out of the way, we will never  	have fair play again in this country and we&#8217;ll have job creation by virtue  	of taxpayer theft, which is ultimately destructive, and I would argue,  	treasonous to this country.</strong>&#8220;  When Donohue complained that, in  	essence, it&#8217;s harder to spread economic propaganda when the host asks hard  	questions, Ratigan responded, &#8220;<strong>Yes, it is.  Especially when you talk  	nonsense.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em><strong>Oh no they didn&#8217;t:</strong></em> The White House decided to take a  	play out of the &#8220;<em>Sarah Palin Media Strategy</em>&#8221; book, when confronted  	with the mounting criticism in the blogosphere regarding the  	administration&#8217;s failure to achieve civil rights goals for gay citizens.   	NBC White House Correspondent John Harwood 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-furious-at-white_n_317424.html"> reported</a>, &#8220;<strong>For a sign of how seriously the White House does or  	doesn&#8217;t take this opposition, one adviser told me today those bloggers need  	to take off their pajamas, get dressed and realize that governing a  	closely-divided country is complicated and difficult.</strong>&#8220;  <em> Caaaarefullll</em>.  Remember the role bloggers played getting Obama <em> into</em> the White House?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>UPDATE:</strong></span> The White House 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/white-house-disavows-claim-that-gay-critics-bloggers-are-part-of-internet-left-fringe/"> would like to disavow those comments</a>&#8230;never happened&#8230;nothing to see  	here.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now what could we possibly add to all that?  As CNN would say, we&#8217;ll &#8220;<em>leave  it there</em>&#8221; for now&#8230;and see you back here on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Insurance Industry&#8217;s Eleventh Hour Threat&#8230;Misfires</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Ignagni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark McClellan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PricewaterhouseCoopers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Snowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Senate Finance Committee's version of the Health Care Reform Bill comes up for a vote today (as I'm writing this, it passed), we should have expected that there might be some "Eleventh Hour Drama."  It should also be a surprise to NO ONE that the sources of this drama...are the Republicans and the Health Insurance Industry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s version of the Health Care Reform Bill  comes up for a vote today (<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33290417/ns/politics-health_care_reform/">as  I&#8217;m writing this, it passed</a>), we should have expected that there might be  some &#8220;<em>Eleventh Hour Drama</em>.&#8221;  It should also be a surprise to <strong>NO  ONE</strong> that the sources of this drama&#8230;are the Republicans and the Health Insurance  Industry.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s take a quick look at the recent activities within each camp:</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Democrats:</strong></span> Working under the assumption that the bill  will survive the committee, Democrats are already heavily engaged in internal  negotiations.  It is important to remember that the so-called &#8220;<em>Baucus  Bill</em>&#8221; will have to be merged/reconciled with the Health Care Reform bills  coming out of the other Senate and House committees.  While most of these  bills carry a large number of common elements, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/12/AR2009101203165_pf.html"> Democrats are working to resolve</a> within their own ranks the support for  things such as the &#8220;<em>public option</em>,&#8221; and whether the bill will be &#8220;<em>paid  for</em>&#8221; with income-based taxes (<em>preferred in the House</em>) or taxes on the  so-called &#8220;<em>cadillac policies</em>&#8221; (<em>favored in the Senate</em>).</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Republicans:</strong></span> The GOP is having internal disputes as  well&#8230;<em>but of a very different nature</em>.  The current leadership has  drawn a hard line in pushing a &#8220;<strong>kill the bill, and defeat Obama</strong>&#8221; policy.   This policy was dealt its first blow, as Republican strategists pointed out that  &#8220;<strong>Yay, We Killed Health Care Reform</strong>&#8221; is not a slogan they&#8217;ll want to use  in the 2010 and 2012 elections&#8230;defeating Obama might look good on paper, but  if it means publicly destroying the reform of a dismal health care system, then  it will likely cost them more votes than it gains.  Then, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-10-07-gop-healthcare_N.htm"> another shock to the system</a>: respected, GOP, elder statesmen started coming  forward in support of Health Care Reform&#8230;some of them experts on Health Care.   These figures included former Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy  Thompson, former Senate Majority Leader and presidential candidate Bob Dole,  former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (<em>a surgeon</em>),  former  administrator of Medicare and Medicaid Mark McClellan.  These men would  soon be joined by some very high profile members of the current leadership,  California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal,  the latter of which is considered a health care policy expert.</p>
<p>While these announcements of support of Health Care Reform may have swayed  some critical, moderate members of the GOP&#8230;their party leadership was unfazed,  and they promptly let it be known that there would be consequences for GOP  members who supported reform.  Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), who holds a  key vote on the Senate Finance Committee, <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62727-sens-snowe-risks-perch">would  likely not be given the chairmanship</a> of the Commerce, Science and  Transportation Committee, a post for which she is next in line. <em>Snowe&#8217;s  answer</em>?  She&#8217;s <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/snowe-voting-yes-on-senat_n_318745.html"> voting for the bill</a>: &#8220;<strong>Is this bill all that I would want? Far from it.   Is it all that it can be? No. But when history calls, history calls, and I  happen to think that the consequences of inaction dictate the urgency of  Congress to take every opportunity to demonstrate its capacity to solve the  monumental issues of our time.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Health Insurance Industry:</strong></span> Up until yesterday, the industry  was thought to be &#8220;<em>on board</em>&#8221; with the Baucus Bill.  Why <strong>WOULDN&#8217;T</strong> they be?  It has everything they could hope for:  No public option&#8230;.<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.   Everyone forced to buy their policies&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Fines for people who  refuse to buy their policies&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Huge government subsidies so  they&#8217;ll cover poorer people&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Few reforms forcing them to  offer better policies and service&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  No significant price  controls&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  So why, on the eve of the vote, would the  industry&#8217;s top lobbying group, America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), suddenly  declare war on the bill?  <strong>Two reasons&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><strong>1 -</strong> While it requires people to buy their lousy and overpriced  policies, and fines people if they don&#8217;t&#8230;the industry doesn&#8217;t <strong>THINK THE  FINES ARE HIGH ENOUGH</strong>.  So&#8230;they worry that they&#8217;ll only get 20  million new customers, not all 40 million uninsured.</p>
<p><strong>2 -</strong> The new requirement that they have to cover sick people and people  with pre-existing conditions&#8230;will just plain eat into their profits too much.</p>
<p>So, AHIP and it&#8217;s president Karen Ignagni, have released a study, a day  before the vote, that constitutes a simple <strong>THREAT</strong>:  &#8220;<em>If you pass  this bill&#8230;we&#8217;ll just have to raise everybody&#8217;s premiums by 111%.</em>&#8220;   Then, just for good measure&#8230;they <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/ahip-ad-campaign-targets_n_318690.html"> started running ads</a> trying to scare seniors that their Medicare Benefits  would be cut.</p>
<p>The reaction of the White House and Congress&#8230;<strong>NOT WHAT AHIP EXPECTED</strong>.   The White House <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/white-house-office-of-hea_n_317973.html"> pointed out that the timing of the report</a> is clearly political in nature (<em>thank  you, Captain Obvious</em>)&#8230;members of Congress, including members of the Senate  Finance Committee, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/senate-finance-committee-slams-ahip-report.php"> condemned the report</a> as &#8220;<strong>untrue, disingenuous</strong>&#8220;&#8230;health care experts  and critics point out that the assumptions of the study are quite extreme, and  that the company responsible for the study, <em>PricewaterhouseCoopers</em>, is  the same company that produced a study on behalf of &#8220;<em>Big Tobacco</em>&#8221; years  ago, and that study showed that taxes on cigarettes would lead to <strong>economic  armageddon</strong>.</p>
<p>But the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/weiner-ahip-report-makes_n_317561.html"> best reaction</a> came from some rather astute legislators like Representative  Anthony Weiner (D-NY):  This outlandish study&#8230;shows <strong>EXACTLY WHY</strong> we  need the public option.  This study, ironically produced by the Health  Insurance lobby, serves to illustrate clearly:</p>
<p>- The only thing to keep the insurance companies from passing on increased  taxes on their business straight onto the premiums of their policyholders&#8230;<strong>is  the public option.</strong></p>
<p>-  The only thing to keep the insurance companies from passing on the  cost of covering sick people and people with pre-existing conditions onto their  other customers&#8230;<strong>is the public option.</strong></p>
<p>-  The only thing to keep the insurance companies from punitively  punishing the American citizenry for supporting health reform&#8230;<strong>is the public  option.</strong></p>
<p>In short, we know that these companies will not allow <strong>ANYTHING</strong> to cut  into their enormous profit margins&#8230;not taxes, not sick people, not  expectations of quality&#8230;not unless they are <strong>PRESSURED</strong> through  competition in the marketplace to do so.  As Representative Weiner points  out, the only way to subject these companies to the pressures of competition, <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> would be through the implementation of a low cost, government-run alternative.</span></p>
<p><em>Otherwise</em>&#8230;for the industry it will just be business as usual.   And we are all very familiar with what <strong>that</strong> looks like.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Parting note:</strong></span> Interesting article on &#8220;<a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/13/five-things-you-dont-know-about-the-senate-health-care-bill/">Five  Things You Don&#8217;t Know About The Senate Health Care Bill.</a>&#8220;  Check it  out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

