<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; chaos theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/chaos-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Hunting Liberals, President King, and Going Rouge</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Sportsmens Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Gaffney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rouge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Spooner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's Friday...and that means it is time for our weekly "Chaos Theory" installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of political topics ranging from the sublime to the sublimely absurd...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Friday&#8230;and that means it is time for our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221;  installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of  political topics ranging from the sublime to the <em>sublimely absurd</em>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and there are always plenty of links, <em>so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Representative Gregg Harper&#8217;s (R-MS) organization, the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus, has been recently called &#8220;<strong>bipartisan</strong>&#8221; by Senator Ben  	Nelson (D-NE).  When 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0910/get_to_know_a_congressman4.html"> asked by Polico&#8217;s reporter</a>, &#8220;<strong>What in the world does the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus do</strong>,&#8221; one might reasonably expect would be an answer along  	the lines of, &#8220;<em>we support the rights and interests of sportsmen, fishermen,  	and hunters, in Congress.</em>&#8220;  What one might <strong>NOT</strong> expect, was Harper&#8217;s  	response: &#8220;<strong>We hunt liberal, tree-hugging Democrats, although it does  	seem like a waste of good ammunition.</strong>&#8220;  Very nice&#8230;very  	responsible&#8230;<em>very</em> bipartisan.</li>
<li>Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN), known most for conspiracy  	theories verging on the truly bizarre, has declared that she will not run  	for the presidency in 2012.  Which makes sense&#8230;since she may not even  	be able to win re-election for the seat she currently holds, as the  	residents of her district have grown more than a bit weary of her  	embarrassing statements, and the negative attention they attract.   	However, Bachmann 	<a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/47697/bachmann-says-no-to-white-house-run-want-rep-steve-king-instead"> did provide an interesting recommendation</a> for who she thinks <strong>SHOULD</strong> run:   	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Representative Steve King (R-IA)</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;she&#8217;s recommending  	the man who brought us such hits as being 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/08/rep-steve-king-lone-vote_n_227866.html"> the only vote</a> against a resolution stating that it was wrong to use  	slaves to build our Capitol,  sponsoring his own resolution &#8220;<strong>recognizing  	the importance of Christians and the Christian faith</strong>,&#8221; and very recently  	stating that gay rights are a &#8220;<strong>purely socialist concept</strong>.&#8221;  Way to  	really think it through, Michele&#8230;he is a <em>winner</em>.</li>
<li>I guess Republicans just <strong>LOVE</strong> Twitter.  	<a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/blogtalk-twitter-and-the-gop/"> It&#8217;s also being reported</a>&#8230;that they love setting up fake Twitter  	accounts and webpages, where they pretend to be particular Democratic  	legislators and candidates.  They then use these fraudulent accounts to  	misinform and offend voters.  Twitter has caught on and is trying to  	close all the accounts being used by Republicans in this way.  I think  	I may know why they like Twitter more than actual blogs:  on Twitter  	nobody expects you to actually use <em>facts</em> and defend your position&#8230;you  	can get  	away with just blurting out a few words of nonsense.</li>
<li>The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee 	<a href="http://dscc.org/gopplan">has put out an ad</a>, claiming that  	Republicans have wasted over 1,000 hours in the Senate, through exploitation  	of parliamentary rules and procedures.  The DSCC does little to show  	how they arrived at this figure&#8230;but I would guess that much of what the  	GOP has fought for in Congress also qualifies as a waste of time.  <em>Need  	examples?</em> This clip, a spoof on the iPhone commercials, has been  	making the internet rounds, and I think it nicely sums up the kinds of  	platforms and positions the GOP is using to distract our attention, delay  	progress, and otherwise hinder real issues from being addressed:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I">www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>A Telling List:</strong> Want to see clips of the &#8220;<em>Top Ten Distortions  	Perpetrated By FOX News?</em>&#8220;  Well look no further than 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/the-ten-most-egregious-fo_n_327140.html"> this link</a>.  It includes such highlights as accusing an Obama czar  	of condoning statutory rape, editing a clip of Joe Biden quoting John  	McCain&#8230;so that it appeared as if Biden said the quote, editing a clip of  	Barack Obama so it appeared that he supported a European-style health care  	system&#8230;when he was actually opposing the idea, <strong>AND</strong> directly repeating,  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">verbatim</span>, GOP talking points as if they were news.  <em>Enjoy</em>&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 1:</strong> A Hollywood charity is mounting a push to  	encourage more Americans to volunteer.  Since Obama has also supported  	volunteerism as important, Glenn Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/glenn-beck-slams-obama-en_n_326632.html"> could only imagine one thing</a>:  That Obama is using Hollywood&#8230;<em>to  	turn us into Communist China</em>.  No, I&#8217;m serious&#8230;here&#8217;s what he said: &#8220;<strong>Celebrities  	are coming together to make it cool to volunteer. Disney gives you a free  	day at the park. This is all fine, but doesn&#8217;t it seem a little bit  	convenient that all of this comes out now at the same time the Obama  	administration is calling for it? Obama controls the message through the  	media he holds in his pocket. Or in his little hand. And soon if you  	disobey, he&#8217;ll just go [Beck slaps his hand]. Now the message will be  	embedded in television shows. Isn&#8217;t this great? Aren&#8217;t you proud of what  	we&#8217;re doing? Oh, this certainly is change.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 2:</strong> Why is it that every time I write about  	something Glenn Beck said, I feel the need to also say, &#8220;<em>No really&#8230;that&#8217;s  	what he said?</em>&#8220;  Well, Beck was busy this week providing more ammunition  	for whomever is filling out the civil commitment papers on him, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/glenn-beck-smears-progres_n_327860.html"> claiming</a> that progressives/liberals&#8230;<em>wait for it</em>&#8230;have historically  	tried to take away everyone&#8217;s individual liberties, and could also be called  	&#8220;<strong>tyrants</strong>&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>slave holders</strong>.&#8221;  &lt;&lt;Sigh&gt;&gt;&#8230;</li>
<li>Neocon Frank Gaffney has claimed in the past that Obama was some sort of  	&#8220;s<em>ecret Muslim</em>,&#8221; that there is evidence connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and  	the Oklahoma City bombing (<em>there isn&#8217;t, of course, and shame on you if you  	didn&#8217;t know that</em>), that Sarah Palin learned foreign policy just by <em>living</em> in  	Alaska, that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (<em>but that the  	media hid this &#8220;fact&#8221; from us</em>), and that Democratic officials who criticized  	former President George W. Bush&#8230;should be hanged.  I tell you all  	this&#8230;so it will be of no surprise that Gaffney has no more decency than he  	has sense.  In a recent appearance on Hardball with Chris Matthews, he  	told Ron Reagan&#8230;<strong>that his father would be ashamed of him:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>John Stossel of the FOX Business Channel recently condemned Lou Dobbs&#8217;,  	of CNN, for Dobb&#8217;s ongoing &#8220;<strong>rants about immigrants wrecking America.</strong>&#8220;   	Dobbs has now responded, and rather unkindly: &#8220;<strong>Fox Business News  	- their new hire John Stossel -- weighing in  		with his own brand of myopic idiocy and no information whatsoever sat  		down with self-described rodeo clown Glenn Beck…what a self-important  		ass</strong><strong>…He doesn’t understand basic economics…He’s just a silly  	little trick waiting to do some sort of Libertarian flip&#8230;Immigrants wrecking America  	-  I’ve never said anything close to that.  		As a matter of fact, I embrace immigrants to this country, I welcome  		them, I want more -- and as a matter of public policy, we need them. </strong> <strong>In no way am I restrictionist, and to hear this ass continue his  		act over at Fox News. I just can’t wait until he starts blowing bubbles  		in the air -- that’s about all he’s equipped to do.</strong>&#8220;   	That&#8217;s right Lou, you never said the &#8220;<em>immigrants are wrecking America</em>&#8220;&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">except  	the time</a> you accused them of bringing leprosy here&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">or the  	time</a> you claimed they were forming a conspiracy to take back their old  	national territory&#8230;oh, and 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/"> remember the time</a> you said they were a threat to the entire middle  	class, and working people everywhere?  Dobbs&#8230;before you start trying  	to play &#8220;<em>friend to the immigrant</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>holier than thou</em>&#8221; with John Stossel&#8230;you  	might want to watch some your own clips on YouTube.</li>
<li>How better to wrap up the &#8220;<em>Media Gone Wild</em>&#8221; segment of the post, than  	with an Ann Coulter item.  During her appearance on Joy Behar&#8217;s talk  	show, she stated that all Presidential assassins have been liberals: &#8220;<strong>As  	I have not only witnessed in my own life but described in &#8216;Guilty&#8217;, every  	presidential assassination or attempted presidential assassination was  	committed by some kind of left-wing loon, communist, anarchist,  	communitarian, or they had no politics at all.</strong>&#8220;  Behar attempts to  	point out that this statement is indefensible and patently false&#8230;but Ms.  	Coulter has never been the one to stop talking so that someone else can  	point out <strong>HOW WRONG SHE IS</strong>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>COURTESY OF THE PENTAGON AND THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Apparently, there are at least 220 detainees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval  	Prison&#8230;which have been found to have had no ties to terrorism, 9/11, or to  	pose any other kind of threat to the United States&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>but we&#8217;re still keeping  	them in prison</strong></span>.  The Supreme Court 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/guantanamo-uighurs-rights_n_327027.html"> is preparing to look at this problem</a>&#8230;yet another in a list of how  	Bush&#8217;s use of the military prison conflicts with seemingly <strong>EVERY</strong> aspect of  	Due Process listed in our Constitution.  <em>A reminder:</em> the  	base/prison is technically &#8220;<em>American soil</em>&#8221; and the Constitution does not say  	that it applies only to &#8220;<em>citizens</em>&#8221; but rather to all &#8220;<strong>persons</strong>.&#8221;  On a  	related note, a group called <em>New Security Action</em>, with the support of a  	number of retired generals and other veterans, 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYN6yeRWYbI&amp;feature=player_embedded"> has released a series of ads</a> pointing out that Congress should step  	aside and allow Gitmo, which has come to represent nearly everything wrong  	about the Bush-Cheney way of thinking, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">to be closed</span>.</li>
<li><strong>No surprise:</strong> Turns out the Pentagon was engaged in a highly  	organized program to sell the American people on the Iraq War and other Bush  	security policies.  <strong>Big surprise:</strong> Well&#8230;it wasn&#8217;t so much an &#8220;<em>ad  	campaign</em>&#8221; or a &#8220;<em>public relations program</em>&#8220;&#8230;as it was 	<a href="http://rawstory.com/2009/10/bryan-whitman-2/">a series of  	psychological experiments</a> being performed on the American citizenry.   	<strong>Bonus surprise:</strong> One of the chief architects of this program?  He  	still works at the Pentagon in the same position.  Scully&#8230;Mulder&#8230;<em>where  	are you when we need you?</em></li>
<li>Most people were a bit surprised at the unmitigated gall of the 30  	Senate Republicans who voted against Senator Franken&#8217;s (D-MN) bill, which  	would punish government contractors if they tried to keep employees from  	reporting rape.  Turns out, <em>they&#8217;ve got company</em> -- the Defense  	Department 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/defense-department-oppose_n_326569.html"> also doesn&#8217;t like the bill</a>&#8230;because they would hate to have to do  	without KBR, Blackwater, and other companies that threaten/coerce/bribe  	victims of rape to be silent.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Amidst all the talk about a &#8220;<em>public option</em>,&#8221; few are paying  	attention to a development almost as big.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/senate-dems-aim-to-strip_n_328362.html"> Democrats are very close</a> to being able to strip away the anti-trust  	exemption given long ago to the health insurance companies, which has  	allowed them to behave as a monopoly.  Want to know why this is so  	important?  We know how the free market is <strong>SUPPOSED</strong> to  	work&#8230;but when a company is allowed to monopolize an industry or a region,  	then there is no competition to force the company to have fair pricing and  	offer good service&#8230;which leads to our situation today where the health  	insurance companies have high rates, giant profits, deny service, and  	mistreat customers.  Also&#8230;<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/health_competition_map.html">check  	out this map</a>.  <strong>Yes, it&#8217;s disgusting:</strong> most states&#8217; residents, 	<strong>RIGHT NOW</strong>, only have <strong>ONE</strong> or <strong>TWO</strong> insurers that they are 	<strong>ALLOWED</strong> to choose from.  &#8220;<em>Free Market Capitalists</em>&#8220;&#8230;are  	you listening?</li>
<li>First it was &#8220;<em>fat babies</em>.&#8221;  Then it was &#8220;<em>thin babies</em>.&#8221;   	Then it was &#8220;<em>spousal abuse</em>.&#8221;  What new excuse for denying  	coverage did we find out about now?  Yup&#8230;insurance companies, almost  	all of them, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/insurance-companies-rape-_n_328708.html"> will not allow you to purchase a policy</a> with them if you have been  	treated for <strong>RAPE</strong>.  To them&#8230;it&#8217;s just another &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>The push for the public option is in full swing, and polls show it is  	working.  More of the public supports it each day, the House is within  	about <strong>EIGHT</strong> votes of being able to pass it, and we heard the 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/23/reid-is-only-one-or-two-v_n_331652.html"> surprising news</a> today that the Senate may be within <strong>TWO</strong> votes.  	<em>Seriously</em>: <strong>TWO VOTES</strong>.  Here&#8217;s a new ad, featuring Heather  	Graham, explaining why the option is necessary:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70">www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Interesting fact courtesy of Representative Anthony Weiner (D-NY):</span> <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/10/23/weiner-calls-gop-opponents-public-option-give-up-their-medicare"> 55 of the Republicans</a> opposing the public option because it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>government-run</em>&#8221;  	or &#8220;<em>socialism</em>&#8220;&#8230;they&#8217;re currently <strong>ON</strong> <strong>MEDICARE</strong>.   	Weiner says, &#8220;<strong>Even in a town known for hypocrisy, this list of 55 Members  	of Congress deserve some sort of prize. They apparently think the public  	option is ok for them, but not anyone else.</strong>&#8220;  Yes, indeed.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GAY RIGHTS&#8230;OR THE LACK THEREOF:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wow</strong>:  It&#8217;s rare that someone actually <strong>ADMITS</strong> that their argument  	against gay rights and/or gay marriage is hollow and baseless.  Ross Douthat,  	conservative columnist for the New York Times, was asked while sitting on a  	panel for &#8220;<em>young, bright, neo-cons</em>&#8221; what he thought about gay marriage.  	<a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/media/n1-panel-cat-got-douthats-tongue-topic-gay-marriage"> His response</a>:  &#8220;<strong>I am someone opposed to gay marriage who is  	deeply uncomfortable arguing the issue in public.</strong>&#8220;  He explained  	that his reason for feeling &#8220;<strong>uncomfortable</strong>&#8221; discussing the subject,  	was because his argument against it is purely religious, and that it  	therefore represents &#8220;<strong>a losing argument.</strong>&#8220;  He even went so far  	as to recognize that because he is embarrassed that he has no real, factual  	objection to gay marriage&#8230;and because he is embarrassed to say what his  	objection really is&#8230;perhaps that means he needs to change his position and  	support gay marriage.  <em>Wow.  Again&#8230;wow.</em></li>
<li>Related to the previous item, a mailing sent out in Maine is attempting  	to persuade residents of the state to vote &#8220;<em>Yes</em>&#8221; in the upcoming ballot item  	to prohibit gay marriage.  The reasons that it proposes? I happen to  	have FiveThirtyEight.com&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/10/arguments-against-gay-marriage.html"> summations of the reasons</a>&#8230;first, the mailing claims that the new law  	permitting gay marriage &#8220;<strong>won&#8217;t make gay marriage equal to straight  	marriage. Instead, it will create a new kind of marriage in which gay people  	and straight people are equal.</strong>&#8220;  Well, besides not making much  	sense&#8230;that&#8217;s certainly not going to &#8220;<em>stir up</em>&#8221; too many people.   	The second reason it offers: &#8220;<strong>&#8230;we may not have proven any connection  	between gay marriage and public education, our opponents haven&#8217;t disproven  	the connection, and it&#8217;s their fault that the subject came up.</strong>&#8220;   	Impressive&#8230;that doesn&#8217;t really say anything, does it.  I mean, it  	sounds like it&#8217;s saying something&#8230;but then it just&#8230;doesn&#8217;t.  And  	third, the mailing offers that, &#8220;<strong>if gay marriage is upheld, then marriage  	will exist solely to make people happy.</strong>&#8220;  Well,  	it&#8217;s hard to see how that&#8217;s true&#8230;would gay people marrying suddenly make  	heterosexual marriages &#8220;<em>meaningless</em>&#8221; and about nothing more than &#8220;<em>happiness</em>?&#8221;   	And hell, I know some people who will tell you that marriage has nothing to  	do with happiness at all&#8230;I&#8217;m sure they were just kidding&#8230;</li>
<li><em>Meet Philip Spooner:</em> Want to hear a86-year-old  	man&#8230;lifelong Republican&#8230;and WWII veteran who fought on D-Day&#8230;defend  	gay marriage with all his heart?  <em>Yeah, me too:</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Despite the calls from Republicans that protecting gay Americans was the  	equivalent of protecting practitioners of  <em>pedophilia, bestiality,  	and necrophilia</em>&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/22/hate-crimes-bill-approved_n_330702.html">the  	new Hate Crimes Bill has passed</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The Nation, a well-known progressive magazine, 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28609.html">is publishing</a> a &#8220;<em>companion piece</em>&#8221; to Sarah Palin&#8217;s new book, &#8220;<em>Going Rogue</em>.&#8221;  It&#8217;s  	titled &#8220;<em>Going Rouge</em>&#8221; and features an almost identical cover, to match the  	almost identical title.  Some conservatives have complained that this  	might lead to some people purchasing The Nation&#8217;s book by mistake.   	Perhaps they&#8217;re right&#8230;seeing as both books will likely be placed next to  	each other on a shelve in the &#8220;<em>Humor</em>&#8221; section&#8230;and due to the fact that  	many of the people seeking Palin&#8217;s book might not know how &#8220;<em>rogue</em>&#8221; is  	properly spelled.</li>
</ul>
<p>That about wraps it up for this week in Reality Liberation.  Have a  wonderful weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Waterboarding Grandkids, Possum Meat, Nazi Golfers</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Castellanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Values Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Ratigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keep American Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcia Greenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF's weekly "Chaos Theory Edition" where we wrap up the remaining strange news items from the week.  Only four categories this week, but lots of links and clips.  Let's get started...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF&#8217;s  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; where we wrap up the remaining strange news  items from the week.</p>
<p>Only four categories this week&#8230;but lots of links, so <em>let&#8217;s get started</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>We&#8217;ve all been witness to the GOP&#8217;s recent &#8220;<em>enlightenment</em>&#8221;  	regarding the nation&#8217;s debt.  For the last eight years, while they held  	the reins of Congress, the rampant government spending was &#8220;<em>absolutely  	necessary</em>.&#8221;  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now:</span></strong> It&#8217;s the equivalent of kicking our  	grandchildren in the teeth.  Or, as Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma)  	recently put it, it&#8217;s the equivalent of &#8220;<strong>waterboarding</strong>&#8221; them.  	<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62973-its-coburn-vs-krugman-on-spending"> Coburn said</a>, &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;re going to waterboard them.  We&#8217;re going to  	flood them with debt.</strong>&#8220;  Senator Coburn was referring to a program  	funding the study of political science, which 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/08/coburn-political-science/"> Coburn claims is not necessary</a>&#8230;since people can learn all that  	they need to know about politics from <strong>CABLE NEWS</strong>.  It&#8217;s suddenly  	quite obvious where <strong>HE</strong> learned most of what <strong>HE</strong> knows  	about it&#8230;</li>
<li>It&#8217;s an established fact that Republicans have had some difficulty  	adjusting to the &#8220;<em>internet age</em>&#8220;&#8230;perhaps best displayed by the fact  	that most of them don&#8217;t seem to realize that if they say something that  	directly contradicts what they said one year ago, the clip of both  	statements will be on <em>YouTube</em> before the day is out.  Want to  	see a slideshow of the &#8220;<em>Top Nine Republican Internet Fails</em>?&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/republican-internet-fails_n_319574.html"> Here you go</a>&#8230;</li>
<li>The number one problem with allying oneself with a minority of loud,  	activist, ignorant, and unreasonable people&#8230;is that you suddenly lose the  	support of the much larger body of normal, moderate, sane folks.  Want  	to see what happens if you try to win the moderate people back by behaving  	like a reasonable human being, open to compromise and the good ideas of  	others?  Watch here as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) finds out what  	happens when the lunatics figure out that you are not really one of them:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Liz Cheney is not quite done fighting her father&#8217;s battles&#8230;no matter  	how many times she appears on discussion panels and is identified as having  	the foreign policy knowledge of a teenager.  Now 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28212.html">she has  	formed</a> the &#8220;<em>Keep America Safe</em>&#8221; organization, whose mission  	statement claims to support &#8220;<strong>an unapologetic approach to fighting  	terrorism around the world, for victory in the wars this country fights, for  	democracy and human rights, and for a strong American military that is  	needed in the dangerous world in which we live.</strong>&#8220;  Ms.  	Cheney&#8230;first of all, even if we look only at the fact that planes have not  	crashed into buildings this year, President Obama <strong>ALREADY</strong> has a  	better track record than your father had, in terms of keeping the country  	safe.  Secondly, Obama has succeeded in gaining international allies  	in the struggle against terrorists&#8230;allies that your father helped to  	alienate.  And third, well, I think the DNC put it best in their  	response: &#8220;<strong>Last fall, the American people overwhelmingly rejected a  	radical foreign policy authored by Dick Cheney that alienated our allies,  	emboldened our enemies, depleted our resources, distracted our focus and  	made the nation less secure. The Cheneys lost that debate and their approach  	was deemed a failure. The Cheneys can continue to focus on securing their  	sullied legacy if they want to. But, the President will continue to focus on  	securing the country.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Exactly</em>.</li>
<li>Retaining his crown as &#8220;<em>King of the Bizarre Analogy</em>,&#8221; RNC  	Chariman Michael Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/michael-steele-cow-on-the_n_321121.html"> said in a recent FOX interview</a> that he feels like&#8230;well&#8230;health care  	reform is a &#8220;<strong>train</strong>,&#8221; and President Obama is the conductor, and Obama  	is trying to get all the Republicans to get on board, and Steele sees  	himself as a &#8220;<strong>cow on the tracks.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Ok, sure.</em></li>
<li>I mentioned in a previous post, one way that you know that the GOP is  	focused on simply <strong>OPPOSING EVERYTHING</strong> is when a number of GOP  	legislators vote against Senator Franken&#8217;s first bill:  a bill <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> protecting rape victims</span>, working for companies with government  	contracts.  Here&#8217;s Jon Stewart, who points out what should be an  	obvious truth: &#8220;<strong>If, to protect Halliburton, you have to side against rape  	victims, you might want to rethink your allegiances.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>It recently came to light, in part because of the work done by the  	National Women&#8217;s Law Center, that in eight states, insurance companies can  	and do consider being the victim of spousal abuse a &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition</em>&#8221; that allows them to deny coverage.  State and  	Federal representatives from most of the eight states expressed immediate  	embarrassment and outrage over the situation, and most have already taken  	steps to remedy the matter. <strong>But not Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</strong>.   	When the president of the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, Marcia Greenberger, 	<a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_10_15/2009_10_15.html"> appeared before a Senate committee</a> to discuss the issue, Burr thought it  	appropriate to repeatedly interrupt and otherwise disrespect her:</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>:  If I could  get back to your question about the specific examples: they manifest themselves  in many different ways. For example, if a woman ends up in an emergency room  with cuts, bruises, broken arms, black eyes, typical injuries that result from  domestic violence, we know of instances where women are being denied insurance  coverage and neither the insurance company&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: My question&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;doesn&#8217;t view  that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;is specifically about  North Carolina&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;and I&#8217;m trying  to answer that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;and the insurance  commissioner tells me we haven&#8217;t had a case. We haven&#8217;t had anybody&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: Well, I&#8217;m trying  to explain. First, I think it&#8217;s great that he is now explicitly having a rule,  which as our report pointed out, didn&#8217;t exist before. So that&#8217;s really  excellent, because of the way insurance companies deal with this issue in  particular. They will often deny the coverage of victims and survivors of  domestic violence without saying that that&#8217;s the reason&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;I&#8217;m just going by  your report&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: You asked the  question about did we follow up and we did. </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: Well, I found more  information in my one call to North Carolina than I think your report did. </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Again?</em> Representative Bill Otto (R-Kansas) has obviously  	not been paying attention.  First he 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a video</a> on YouTube titled &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he raps (<em>and  	badly</em>) his various criticisms of President Obama, and about eating  	opossum, which he calls &#8220;<strong>the other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;  This obviously  	drew allegations of racism (<em>at a minimum it is childish, insensitive, and  	inane</em>), and eventually the clip was removed from the site.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/bill-otto-says-he-will-re_n_323686.html"> And now</a>&#8230;Otto says he&#8217;s going to repost the video, because it was his  	adult daughters who took the video down, and also because he fears that &#8220;<strong>People  	are going to think that this was done by people to shut me up.  I&#8217;m  	getting hate e-mails from Maryland to California, but, hey, that&#8217;s part of  	the game.</strong>&#8220;  Mr. Otto:  It&#8217;s not a <em>game</em>, it&#8217;s civil  	service and <strong>YOU</strong> are an elected official, <em>jackass</em>.  Next  	time, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">listen to your daughters</span>&#8230;and try to learn from the lessons of  	other, like the <strong>OTHER</strong> Kansas legislator who just recently got in a  	heap of trouble 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Kansas_Rep_GOP_needs_great_white_hope.html"> for saying</a> that the GOP is looking for a &#8220;<strong>great white hope</strong>&#8221; to  	defeat Obama.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Want the &#8220;<em>short version</em>&#8221; of the merry war between the White House  	and <em>FOX News</em>?  Here goes&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>WHITE HOUSE:</strong></span> FOX News <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/anita-dunn-fox-news-an-ou_n_316691.html"> serves as the propaganda arm</a> of the Republican Party.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BILL O&#8217;REILLY:</strong></span> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bill-oreilly-glenn-beck-d_n_318085.html"> Nuh uh</a>&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA MATTERS:</strong></span> Umm&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/fox_news_channel?tab=all">it&#8217;s  pretty obvious</a>, guys&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GLENN BECK:</strong></span> The administration is like the Nazis&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/glenn-beck-compares-fox-n_n_318784.html">and  we&#8217;re the Jews</a>!</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NEW STUDY:</strong></span> Not only is it true, but we found something  interesting:  Most of the anti-Obama forces aren&#8217;t particularly  racist&#8230;the only thing they have in common is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/gop-base-driven-by-bizarr_n_323796.html"> they all watch FOX News</a>, and because of this&#8230;<em>they believe some pretty  outlandish sh-t.</em></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s fun picking on CNN&#8217;s inability to both perform research and report  	news.  It&#8217;s especially fun&#8230;if you&#8217;re Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember the rather bizarre reactions from some members of the media  	when Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize?  Well, Rachel Maddow thinks it  	can all be explained by &#8220;<em>Obama Derangement Syndrome:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>By now you&#8217;ve heard that the Senate Finance Committee managed to pass  	the &#8220;<em>Baucus Bill.</em>&#8220;  You also heard that Republican Olympia Snowe  	(R-Maine) voted along with the Democrats to send the bill on.  And  	recently, 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33308113/ns/politics-health_care_reform/"> it may have come to your attention</a> that another Maine Republican,  	Senator Susan Collins, may also lend her support for the bill.  Well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/exclusive-moveon-whacks-f_n_318640.html"> MoveOn.org</a>, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal  	Employees, the AFL-CIO, and the Communications Workers of America would like  	to remind you:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/senate-health-bill-oppose_n_318920.html"> it&#8217;s a CRAPPY bill</a>, that would make a mountain of money for the  	insurance companies, would change little in the way they do business, and  	would <strong>NOT</strong> serve to get all of America&#8217;s uninsured the health care coverage  	that they need.  In fact&#8230;any <strong>OTHER</strong> House and Senate version  	might just be a better choice.</li>
<li><strong><em>Thank you, Captain Obvious:</em></strong> The most ridiculously  	unnecessary headline in health care reform news 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/13/AR2009101303472.html">comes courtesy</a> of <em>The Washington  	Post</em>:  &#8220;<strong>Health Insurers Emerge as Obama&#8217;s Top Foe in Reform  	Effort.</strong>&#8221; That&#8217;s right&#8230;.&#8221;<em>emerging</em>&#8220;&#8230;as if it weren&#8217;t  	always the case.</li>
<li>Think only our elected officials are in the pocket of the health  	insurance industry&#8230;but our stalwart media will be there to keep us  	informed of the truth regarding the health care debate.  <em>Maybe not.</em> CNN contributor, Alex Castellanos&#8230;has been 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140037">revealed</a> to be  	connected at the hip with America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (<em>AHIP</em>),  	the monolithic insurance lobby currently (<em>and ferociously</em>)  	campaigning to kill reform legislation.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t generally hear about &#8220;<em>progressive faith groups</em>,&#8221; but  	the <em>American Values Network</em> aims to change that.  They are 	<a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/healthcare/faces-ad/">currently  	releasing ads</a>&#8230;emphasizing the moral and religious arguments supporting  	heath care reform.  It&#8217;s not a difficult argument to make, and  	represents one of the best examples of &#8220;<em>fighting fire with fire</em>&#8221; that  	we have seen in a long time.</li>
<li>Is it obvious that former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has a new  	book out?  Not only has he been making the usual talk show rounds, but  	he also managed to inject a little sanity into the health care debate.   	Of right-wing assertions that the Obama plan represents &#8220;<em>socialized  	medicine</em>&#8221; and warrants comparisons to Britain, Canada, and France, Frist 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3tLHqGz7uE&amp;feature=player_embedded"> said on C-SPAN</a>, &#8220;<strong>What the Obama administration is doing is not  	socialized medicine.  Socialized medicine is where the government owns  	the hospitals, owns the doctors, and decides how people get paid.</strong>&#8220;   	Yes&#8230;thank you&#8230;<em>finally</em>&#8230;is everybody listening?</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>In Lakeville, Massachusetts, someone 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/10/13/swastika-obama-carved-int_ws_319331.html"> carved a swastika</a> and the word &#8220;<strong>Obama</strong>&#8221; into a golf course green.   	The course manager believes that someone used either a cleated golf shoe  	or some other tool to perform the vandalism.  Strange&#8230;one would certainly think  	that America&#8217;s golfers have had some extra time to get used to the idea of  	having a very popular, half African-American leader.</li>
<li><em><strong>NEW HERO:</strong></em> Dylan Ratigan hosts the &#8220;<em>Morning Meeting</em>&#8221;  	show on MSNBC, and lately has shown to be a tough, bright host&#8230;who knows  	how to play hardball.  In 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/dylan-ratigan-to-chamber_n_320397.html"> a recent interview</a> with Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S.  	Chamber of Commerce, Ratigan responded to Donohue&#8217;s attempts to claim that  	free, unfettered enterprise has the solutions to all problems by saying, &#8220;<strong>unless  	the government and people like you that lobby to the exemptions that allow  	banks to [speculate with taxpayer money] get out of the way, we will never  	have fair play again in this country and we&#8217;ll have job creation by virtue  	of taxpayer theft, which is ultimately destructive, and I would argue,  	treasonous to this country.</strong>&#8220;  When Donohue complained that, in  	essence, it&#8217;s harder to spread economic propaganda when the host asks hard  	questions, Ratigan responded, &#8220;<strong>Yes, it is.  Especially when you talk  	nonsense.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em><strong>Oh no they didn&#8217;t:</strong></em> The White House decided to take a  	play out of the &#8220;<em>Sarah Palin Media Strategy</em>&#8221; book, when confronted  	with the mounting criticism in the blogosphere regarding the  	administration&#8217;s failure to achieve civil rights goals for gay citizens.   	NBC White House Correspondent John Harwood 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-furious-at-white_n_317424.html"> reported</a>, &#8220;<strong>For a sign of how seriously the White House does or  	doesn&#8217;t take this opposition, one adviser told me today those bloggers need  	to take off their pajamas, get dressed and realize that governing a  	closely-divided country is complicated and difficult.</strong>&#8220;  <em> Caaaarefullll</em>.  Remember the role bloggers played getting Obama <em> into</em> the White House?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>UPDATE:</strong></span> The White House 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/white-house-disavows-claim-that-gay-critics-bloggers-are-part-of-internet-left-fringe/"> would like to disavow those comments</a>&#8230;never happened&#8230;nothing to see  	here.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now what could we possibly add to all that?  As CNN would say, we&#8217;ll &#8220;<em>leave  it there</em>&#8221; for now&#8230;and see you back here on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Obama&#8217;s Prize, Mary&#8217;s Baby, And Rush&#8217;s Testicles</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIGNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nataline Sarkisyan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Lowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality Liberation Front blog post our weekly "Chaos Theory" edition...featuring the very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected officials and members of the media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality  Liberation Front blog post our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition&#8230;featuring the  very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected  officials and members of the media.</p>
<p>&#8230;and it has been a <strong>VERY</strong> busy couple of days, leaving us with a lot of  ground to cover, so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The request made a year ago for Sarah Palin&#8217;s emails&#8230;<a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/965388.html">still  	unfulfilled</a> by the Governor&#8217;s Office, that usually responds to such &#8220;<em>public  	record requests</em>&#8221; in <strong>TEN DAYS</strong>.  The department says that it  	sometimes takes longer for &#8220;<em>complicated</em>&#8221; requests&#8230;but since we all  	know that pulling up archived emails is not complicated, some are asking  	what the delay <strong>REALLY</strong> signifies.</li>
<li>Senator Kyl (R-AZ) may have really stepped in it when he mocked women&#8217;s  	need for Maternity Care to be covered by their insurance&#8230;saying it wasn&#8217;t  	fair to include it because, in his words: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t need maternity care</strong>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/kyl-hit-with-local-ads-sh_b_308405.html"> Not only have ads been run</a> in his state, to make women aware of Kyl&#8217;s  	statements&#8230;but now 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/arizona-mothers-storm-kyl_b_313458.html"> mothers are showing up</a> at his Senate Office in protest.  It certain  	doesn&#8217;t help Kyl and the GOP&#8217;s image with women voters, that they voted <strong> AGAINST</strong> an amendment that would bar companies from getting government  	contracts&#8230;if they pressure female employees not to file harassment claims.</li>
<li>In an increasingly disturbing trend involving Republicans attempting  	label Democrats as &#8220;<em>enemies</em>&#8221; of America, Representative Paul Broun  	(R-GA) 	<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/broun-pelosi-a-domestic-enemy-of-the-constitution.php?ref=fpblg"> referred to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi</a> as a &#8220;<strong>domestic enem[y] of the  	Constitution.</strong>&#8220;  Broun wasn&#8217;t finished: &#8220;<strong>When I was sworn into  	the Marine Corps, I was sworn to uphold the Constitution against every  	enemy, foreign and domestic.  We&#8217;ve got a lot of domestic enemies of  	the Constitution and one of those sits in the speaker&#8217;s chair of the United  	States Congress, Nancy Pelosi.</strong>&#8220;  Broun, when you were sworn into  	the Marine Corps, you were also sworn to obey and respect your Commander in  	Chief&#8230;but that didn&#8217;t stop you from calling Obama &#8220;<em>Hitler.</em>&#8220;   	Maybe you didn&#8217;t understand your oath?</li>
<li>Of course, Broun isn&#8217;t the only one lobbing insults at Pelosi&#8230;the  	National Republican Congressional Committee said Pelosi should &#8220;<strong>be put in  	her place</strong>&#8221; over her remarks about Afghanistan.  Number of  	Republican, female legislators and Republican women&#8217;s groups 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/female-republicans-fail-t_n_314265.html"> willing to declare</a> the statement sexist and inappropriate:  <strong>ZERO</strong>.   	Representative Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no</span>.  Representative  	Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nope</span>.  Representative Sue Myrick  	(R-N.C.)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nuh uh</span>.  Representative Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">not  	a word</span>.  Representative Mary Bono Mack&#8217;s (R-CA)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no way</span>.   	The list of shame goes on, and on&#8230;<strong>sad</strong>.</li>
<li>Robert Lowry, the Republican running against Representative Wasserman  	Schultz in her bid for re-election&#8230;well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/robert-lowry-shoots-targe_n_315229.html"> he thought it would fun</a> at a &#8220;<em>shooting event</em>&#8221; to shoot at a  	target, which showed the silhouette of a body, and upon which Wasserman  	Schultz&#8217;s initials had been written next to the head of the target.   	First he tried to call it a &#8220;<strong>joke</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and then later said it was a &#8220;<strong>mistake</strong>.&#8221;   	You were right the second time Lowry&#8230;<em>it&#8217;s a big mistake</em>.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/boehner-pence-vote-agains_n_314194.html"> That&#8217;s right</a>:  the latest defense bill&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">the Republicans are  	voting against it</span>&#8230;because it also has provisions that would protect  	gay people against violence.  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Message received:</span> </strong>The GOP  	believes in defending America&#8217;s citizens&#8230;<em>just not if they&#8217;re gay</em>.</li>
<li>Paul Krugman has written 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion"> an interesting column</a> about the GOP&#8217;s current &#8220;<em>politics of spite</em>:&#8221;   	that they will vote against anything, no matter how worthwhile, if it came  	from the President or other Democrats.  How else can you explain that 	<strong>THIRTY</strong> Republican Senators voted against Al Franken&#8217;s bill to punish  	government contractors who &#8220;<strong>restrict their employees from taking  	workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court?</strong>&#8220;   	The Senators who voted against the bill are:</li>
<p><strong>Alexander (R-TN)<br />
Barrasso (R-WY)<br />
Bond (R-MO)<br />
Brownback (R-KS)<br />
Bunning (R-KY)<br />
Burr (R-NC)<br />
Chambliss (R-GA)<br />
Coburn (R-OK)<br />
Cochran (R-MS)<br />
Corker (R-TN)<br />
Cornyn (R-TX)<br />
Crapo (R-ID)<br />
DeMint (R-SC)<br />
Ensign (R-NV)<br />
Enzi (R-WY)<br />
Graham (R-SC)<br />
Gregg (R-NH)<br />
Inhofe (R-OK)<br />
Isakson (R-GA)<br />
Johanns (R-NE)<br />
Kyl (R-AZ)<br />
McCain (R-AZ)<br />
McConnell (R-KY)<br />
Risch (R-ID)<br />
Roberts (R-KS)<br />
Sessions (R-AL)<br />
Shelby (R-AL)<br />
Thune (R-SD)<br />
Vitter (R-LA)<br />
Wicker (R-MS)</strong></ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>It was a hard week for FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity.  First&#8230;former comedian  	and now noticeably <strong>UNFUNNY</strong> political hack, Dennis Miller (<em>what  	happened to you, Dennis&#8230;seriously</em>) appeared on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor.   	After Miller was done poking fun at CNN and MSNBC&#8230;he went after Hannity  	and Beck.  Of course&#8230;after that, he kissed O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s behind&#8230;and  	Beck&#8217;s&#8230;and Roger Ailes&#8217;&#8230;and all the women on FOX&#8230;<em>yick</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA">www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Next up in Hannity&#8217;s &#8220;<em>not-so-hot</em>&#8221; week&#8230;his smear campaign  	against Kevin Jennings, who President Obama has appointed Assistant Deputy  	Secretary at the Department of Education for the Office of Safe and Drug  	Free Schools, was derailed by Hannity&#8217;s guest, George Stephanopoulos.   	Hannity was, as usual, attempting to misrepresent Jennings as some sort of &#8220;<em>lefty-gay-activist-who-is-going-to-turn-all-kids-gay</em>&#8220;&#8230;but  	George wasn&#8217;t having any of it, and points out that 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/03/kevin-jennings/">the facts just  	aren&#8217;t on Hannity&#8217;s side</a>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4">www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>The third &#8220;<em>Hannity Fail</em>&#8221; came when Hannity decided he had what it  	took to face off against filmaker Michael Moore&#8217;s facts&#8230;armed only with  	his usual assumptions and generalizations:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Saturday, we wrote about conservatives rejoicing over America&#8217;s loss (<em>regarding  	the Olympics</em>)&#8230;simply because it is also a loss for Obama.  We  	also mentioned that one conservative set aside partisanship and actually  	wrote a column thanking the President for trying to bring the Olympics (<em>and  	the resulting pride, revenues, and JOBS</em>) back to our country.  That  	conservative was talk show host, and former Republican legislator, Joe  	Scarborough.  So what can we expect when a conservative takes a &#8220;<em>time  	out</em>&#8221; to behave like a reasonable, patriotic American?  <strong>That&#8217;s  	right</strong>&#8230;Rush Limbaugh  has decided to pronounce Scarborough a &#8220;<strong>neutered  	chickified moderate.</strong>&#8220;  You have to appreciate that Scarborough,  	unlike so many other conservatives to face Rush&#8217;s wrath, did not back down:  	&#8220;<strong>I would be careful if I had put my testicles in a blind trust for George  	W. Bush for eight years.  So now, I guess what you do to prove that  	you&#8217;re a real conservative, because you weren&#8217;t a real conservative over the  	past eight years, you call the president names.</strong>&#8221; <em>Yowch</em>!</li>
<li>As one last item&#8230;let&#8217;s watch Stephen Colbert mock Glenn Beck&#8217;s  	breathless and weepy fearmongering, <em>as only Colbert can</em>&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OVAL OFFICE:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>President Obama&#8230;<a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html">has  	won the Nobel Peace Prize</a>.  For his work to advance nuclear  	disarmament, foster better relations with Muslim countries, and to encourage  	cooperation towards shared goals, Obama has been awarded the most  	prestigious peace award the international community can bestow.  The  	citation reads, in part, &#8220;<strong>Obama has as President created a new climate in  	international politics,&#8221; the citation read, in part. &#8220;Multilateral diplomacy  	has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United  	Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and  	negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most  	difficult international conflicts.</strong>&#8220;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obamas-nobel-prize-inspir_n_315167.html"> Two very interesting groups</a> have received this news with disgust and  	outrage: <em>American conservatives&#8230;and Taliban/Al Qaeda/Terrorist  	organizations</em>.  In fact&#8230;Rush Limbaugh went as far 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910090029">as to say</a>, &#8220;<strong>Our  	president is a worldwide joke. Folks, do you realize something has happened  	here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about and that is he  	doesn&#8217;t deserve the award. Now that&#8217;s hilarious, that I&#8217;m on the same side  	of something that the Taliban, and that we all are on the same side as the  	Taliban.</strong>&#8220;  Are you sure that&#8217;s what you really want to say,  	Rush&#8230;that you side with <strong>TERRORISTS</strong> against the <strong>PRESIDENT</strong>?   	Joe Scarborough and his guests 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obama-nobel-prize-a-disas_n_314997.html"> voiced a very different complaint</a>&#8230;that receiving an &#8220;<em>international  	award</em>&#8221; can <strong>ONLY</strong> be seen as a bad thing.  Scarborough said, &#8220;<strong>The  	upside is the Nobel Prize committee that has had suspect selections in the  	past has just befuddled a lot of people across the world</strong>,&#8221; and <em>Time</em>&#8216;s  	Mark Halperin added, &#8220;<strong>I predict right now that he will find a way to  	basically turn it down&#8230;I think he is going to say, I share this with the  	world or whatever. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll embrace this. Because there is no  	upside.</strong>&#8220;  Really?  The Nobel Peace Prize?  I  	mean&#8230;really?  You&#8217;re going to call receiving it a <strong>NEGATIVE</strong> event?</li>
<li><em>Saturday Night Live</em> chose to use its knack for scathing political  	satire to point out a more common complaint about President Obama&#8230;he just  	hasn&#8217;t done that much.  And given that we still have troops in Iraq and  	Afghanistan, Wall Street remains unregulated, 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091003/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_climate_bill_obama_7"> we&#8217;re told</a> not to expect Climate Change legislations, and they say that  	Obama 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/04/obama-to-take-on-dont-ask_n_309040.html"> will start to fight</a> for gay people&#8217;s civil liberties at the &#8220;<strong>right  	time</strong>&#8220;&#8230;it seems SNL may have a good point:</li>
</ul>
<p><object id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="384" height="283" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="384" height="283" src="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Health Care Reform has a new ally:  former Presidential candidate,  	and former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kansas).  Not only did  	Dole predict that the bill will be signed in 2010&#8230;<a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/20187">he  	explained exactly why</a> Republicans are opposing it: &#8220;<strong>Sometimes people  	fight you just to fight you.  They don&#8217;t want Reagan to get it, they  	don&#8217;t want Obama to get it, so we&#8217;ve got to kill it&#8230;Health care is one of  	those things.  Now we&#8217;ve got to do something.</strong>&#8220;  Dole warned,  	as other analysts have, that blind opposition to reform will, in the end,  	help the President politically and hurt the GOP.  As more distinguished  	GOP leaders from days past come forward and make these assertions&#8230;it seems  	to be having an impact, and there is some word that the GOP might be  	scrambling to find ways to both save face and vote for the bill.  	<a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/10/07/breaking-senate-gop-folding-over-health-care-reform/"> RedState.com&#8217;s Erick Erickson</a> reports,  &#8220;<strong>I am told quite reliably that in a meeting today on Capitol Hill,  		Republican Senators began to rapidly move toward concessions on health  		care because they are afraid they cannot hold their members. Some  		Republicans are now thinking of supporting a government program.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>There&#8217;s new life in the &#8220;<em>public option</em>&#8221; and some are calling it  	the &#8220;<em>opt-out public option</em>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/schumer-opt-out-public-op_n_313946.html"> Details are few</a>, but it appears that it would involve a government-run  	insurance plan&#8230;and states could choose not to allow it in their state.   	Democrats and several Republicans seem nominally on board with this, with  	two primary concerns:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>One</strong></span>&#8230;is it a &#8220;robust&#8221; version of  	the public option, or a watered down one.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Two</strong></span>&#8230;how many  	people will it truly help, if many states choose not to implement it?   	The first seems a valid concern, while the second does not.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Our  	prediction:</strong></span> If states choose <strong>NOT</strong> to allow their  	citizens the option to buy affordable public insurance in their state&#8230;it  	will be political suicide for those governors and legislators.  People  	will leave states that don&#8217;t offer it&#8230;and will vote out of office the  	people responsible for not allowing it to be purchased, particularly once  	word gets out that the people who <strong>DO</strong> purchase it in other states, are  	very pleased with it.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/cigna-employee-flips-off_n_314189.html"> Hilda and Krikor Sarkisyan</a> travelled with friends and supporters to the  	CIGNA headquarters in Philadelphia to speak to the CEO&#8230;and to complain  	that his company&#8217;s actions had <strong>KILLED THEIR DAUGHTER</strong>.  CIGNA had  	refused to pay for their daughter&#8217;s liver transplant because they said that  	the completely proven and established surgery was&#8230;wait for it&#8230;&#8221;<strong>too  	experimental</strong>.&#8221;  CIGNA eventually, following protests, changed its  	mind, but it was too late for Nataline Sarkisyan.  While there, several  	CIGNA employees on a balcony decided to show their support and sympathy for  	the Sarkisyans&#8230;by heckling them and making obscene gestures, and  	eventually the police were called to remove the Sarkisyans from the  	property.  CIGNA&#8217;s HR Director&#8217;s response: &#8220;<strong>I was very disappointed  	to learn of the behavior of one of our employees when you were at our  	company&#8217;s headquarters.  I sincerely regret this individual&#8217;s offensive  	and inappropriate action.  Please know that he did not represent the  	views of our company or the views of other employees who work here. We  	deeply empathize with you and wish you peace and comfort in your loss.</strong>&#8220;   	Sorry&#8230;I don&#8217;t think one smarmy letter from your company&#8217;s HR hack is going  	to smooth this one over.  To make matters worse, the Sarkisyan&#8217;s can&#8217;t  	take legal action:  A 1987 Supreme Court ruling <span style="text-decoration: underline;">shields CIGNA from  	lawsuit</span>.</li>
<li>Still haven&#8217;t seen Keith Olbermann&#8217;s special on Health Care Reform?  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/olbermanns-health-care-sp_n_313392.html"> See it here</a>.  <em>Seriously</em>, go watch it now&#8230;we&#8217;ll wait right  	here for you to come back.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Dick Cheney has been noticeably absent from the talk show circuit as of  	late&#8230;most likely because he is about to be under serious investigation  	regarding his part in the &#8220;Valerie Plame Scandal&#8221; and his part in  	authorizing torture, or perhaps because President Obama has now made 	<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/10/cheney-and-co-all-quiet-counterterrorism-front"> substantial gains in the area of counter-terrorism</a>.  Liz Cheney,  	after a few public debacles where defending her father&#8217;s ideology served  	only to make her appear insufficiently informed on all topics, has similarly  	been off the radar.  But that&#8217;s all ok&#8230;because there is still <strong>ANOTHER</strong> Cheney:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mary Cheney</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;The latest of the family to  	grab headlines is Dick Cheney&#8217;s lesbian daughter&#8230;who is now pregnant, and  	on the way towards having her second child with her partner, Heather Poe.   	Well, since Dick Cheney has come out supporting his daughter fully, and has  	switched to a &#8220;<em>pro-gay marriage</em>&#8221; stance, I&#8217;m sure that the rest of the  	conservative community will be totally fine with this.  What&#8217;s that?   	Oh&#8230;maybe not.  Here is just a sampling of the nauseating reactions 	<a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/mary_cheney_and_heather_poe_to_have_second_child_in_november_freepers_react/"> gathered from</a> the conservative site, the Free Republic, by Pam  	Spaulding:</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;<strong>I respect Dick Cheney, but I don&#8217;t understand why he is allowing his  daughter to take innocent children into her lesbianic home. Can anyone claim  that these kids won&#8217;t be scarred for life? So sad. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Also repugnant, IMNSHO, is the use of &#8216;they are expecting a child&#8217; when,  for obvious reasons &#8216;they&#8217; could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight  [sic] of hand that the left does with rediculous [sic] name reversals (like  &#8216;FAMILY PLANNING&#8217;) that implies something that in fact does just not happen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><strong>As much as I don&#8217;t like it, God will have to sort this out in the end.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Who is the father? Yes, you selfish lesbians, there is ALWAYS a father.  Not that the baby will benefit from one. sick.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this occasion? Yathink?  Congratulations on your baster bastard?</strong>&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>75 years ago, the Veterans of Foreign Wars erected a cross in the Mohave  	Desert, to commemorate soldiers who lost their lives in WWI.  The  	problem:  it&#8217;s federal land, and a former National Parks employee (<em>who,  	it should be noted, is a devout Catholic</em>) says that he has no problems with  	crosses&#8230;he just has a problem with a cross on public land.  Citing  	the Separation Of Church and State, this employee also points out that the  	memorial is clearly unfair to soldiers who were Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, or  	who practiced any faith (<em>or no faith</em>) other than Christianity.  It&#8217;s a  	good thing we have nine clear-headed Supreme Court Justices who can settle  	this easy dispute.  <strong>Or</strong>&#8230;.maybe there are only eight clear-headed  	Justices&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/scalia-defends-cross-on-p_n_313625.html">here&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia</a>: &#8220;<strong>It&#8217;s erected as a war memorial. I assume it is  	erected in honor of all of the war dead.  What would you have them  	erect?&#8230;Some conglomerate of a cross, a Star of David, and you know, a  	Muslim half moon and star?&#8230;I don&#8217;t think you can leap from that to the  	conclusion that the only war dead that that cross honors are the Christian  	war dead. I think that&#8217;s an outrageous conclusion.</strong>&#8220;  Yes&#8230;that&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia, who holds one of the highest positions in the land&#8230;saying  	that a cross <strong>REPRESENTS EVERYBODY</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope for a quiet weekend&#8230;some of these folks could use a little  &#8220;<em>quiet reflection time</em>.&#8221;  Until Monday&#8230;have a great one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

