<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Political Carnival &#8211; Five Craziest Things I Saw This Week</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/political-carnival-five-craziest-things-i-saw-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/political-carnival-five-craziest-things-i-saw-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Family Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim-Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overcriminalized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to "catch up" on our nation's political carnival, I present simply the five craziest things I read/saw this week:  Health Care antics, Heritage Foundation hates laws against sex offenders, AFA says no muslims in the military, Carrie Prejean falls from her pedestal, and Lou Dobbs finally quits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to &#8220;<em>catch up</em>&#8221; on our nation&#8217;s political carnival, I  present simply the <strong>five craziest things</strong> I read/saw this week:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HEALTH CARE: RETURN OF THE BUNGLED TEA PARTY PROTESTS -</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Congressional Republicans have been holding a series of protests on the  	hill regarding health care reform legislation&#8230;of course they&#8217;re not  	calling them &#8220;<em>protests</em>,&#8221; but are rather using the term &#8220;<em>press  	conferences.</em>&#8220;  It&#8217;s what we have come to expect:  buses  	sponsored by &#8220;<em>astroturf</em>&#8221; groups dumping groups of disgruntled  	citizens at the Capitol steps&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.  Wildly inaccurate,  	misspelled, racist, and occasionally simply bizarre 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/the-12-most-offensive-sig_n_347398.html?slidenumber=YQKSlGc5xDU="> hand-held signs</a> (<em>including one featuring pictures of holocaust  	victims, comparing health reform to Nazi genocide</em>)&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.   	A Republican legislator (<em>Rep. Todd Akin, R-MO</em>) 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/05/akin-pledge/">botching</a> the  	Pledge of Allegiance right after extolling the importance of the pledge&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.   	Another Republican representative (<em>John Boehner, R-OH</em>) holding up a  	copy of the Constitution, claiming that it is the most important guide to  	his actions and that he&#8217;d like to read a little excerpt from it&#8230;then 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/bungled-pledge-of-allegia_n_347278.html"> proceeding to read</a> from the Declaration of Independence&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.   	Fox News, using an outdated photograph to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/12/hannity-jon-stewart-was-r_n_354887.html"> misrepresent the attendance</a> at the gathering (<em>not the first time  	they&#8217;ve done this</em>), only to get busted by Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily  	Show</em>&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.  For your viewing pleasure, here&#8217;s the <em> Daily Show</em> clip:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:255662" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:255662" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>The protests weren&#8217;t the only &#8220;<em>health-care related</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/11/the-craziest-examples-of_n_354333.html"> spectacle</a>.  Here again is Jon Stewart&#8230;to address the <strong>OTHER</strong> antics of our elected officials:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254903" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254903" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: Pro-Sex Offender?</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>If you&#8217;ve heard about the conservative Heritage Foundation, it is  	probably due to the health care debate&#8230;where they have been quick to  	provide reform opponents with a variety of unfathomably unscientific and  	skewed &#8220;<em>studies</em>&#8221; with which to do battle.  They also have some 	<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200911090001">rather interesting  	legal opinions</a>, which they present on their sister website, 	<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/rd?to=http://www.overcriminalized.com/default.aspx"> Overcriminalized.com</a>.  The Heritage Foundation claims that the site  	&#8220;.<strong>..describes the trend in America -- and particularly in Congress -- to  	use the criminal law to &#8220;solve&#8221; every problem, punish every mistake (instead  	of making proper use of civil penalties), and coerce Americans into  	conforming their behavior to satisfy social engineering objectives</strong>.&#8221;   	What examples do they give of unnecessary laws, to address minor &#8220;<em>mistakes</em>&#8221;  	that they&#8217;d rather see handled in civil proceedings?  How about HR5652,  	the Child Slavery Prevention Act of 2008&#8230;which provides strict sentences  	to people who engage in human trafficking and sex slavery.  And they&#8217;re  	not too fond of HR1632, the International Megan&#8217;s Law of 2009, which  	requires that sex offenders report any intention of travelling abroad, and  	prevents foreign sex offenders who committed their crimes against children  	from coming into our country.  And there&#8217;s HR3513, Prevention and  	Deterrence Of Crimes Against Children Act of 2009 (<em>strongly penalizes  	those involved in child pornography</em>), HR288, Save Our Children: Stop The  	Violent Predators Against Children DNA Act of 2009 (<em>created the DNA  	database for use in identifying and prosecuting sex predators</em>), and  	S431, Keeping the Internet Devoid of Sex Predators (KIDS) Act of 2007 (<em>sex  	offenders have to register all online identifiers, IP address, email  	accounts, usernames, chat names</em>).   Besides being an  	absolutely inane position to take, claiming that these bills are anything  	except a <strong>GOOD</strong> thing&#8230;it certainly seems an odd stance for a group  	that likes to portray themselves as the &#8220;<em>law and order</em>&#8221; crowd.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CONSERVATIVES: NO MUSLIMS IN THE MILITARY -</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>You didn&#8217;t need to have a crystal ball to know that the right-wing  	response to the recent, tragic shooting at Fort Hood in Texas 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091107/ap_on_re_us/us_fort_hood_muslims_in_the_military"> would focus on the fact</a> that the shooter was a Muslim.  First there  	were calls for &#8220;<em>screening Muslims</em>&#8221; who want to serve in the military.   	Besides the obviously xenophobic and discriminatory aspects of this  	suggestion,  it is clear that effecting such a policy would be  	difficult, given our military has been repeatedly and desperately lowering  	its recruiting standards, and currently fails to &#8220;<em>screen out</em>&#8221; members  	of biker gangs, street gangs, assorted violent felons, and individuals with  	terrifying mental histories.  Now, the American Family Association (<em>you  	guessed it&#8230;with a name like that, it has to be a conservative activism  	group</em>) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/09/conservative-group-time-t_n_350945.html"> wants</a> to take things a step further: they call for a ban on Muslims in  	the military.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Quick little bit of history:</strong></span> In  	WWII&#8230;some of our greatest heroes were German-American soldiers who were  	very much in touch with their ancestry, but they put America first.   	Also during WWII, Japanese-American soldiers, despite the internment of so  	many Japanese-Americans in camps&#8230;they put America first, served this  	country, and were recognized for their bravery and sacrifice.  If we  	were fighting in a Christian nation&#8230;would Christians not be allowed to  	serve, for fear of divided loyalty?  <strong>No</strong>&#8230;and Muslim-Americans  	who choose to bravely serve and protect our nation should continue to be  	afforded not only the opportunity&#8230;<em>but also our full gratitude and  	respect</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CARRIE PREJEAN: FALL OF A POORLY CONCEIVED CONSERVATIVE ROLE MODEL -</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Quick Version:</strong></span> Carrie Prejean, Miss California,  	loses the Miss America pageant after saying that she opposes gay marriage.   	Conservatives immediately hail Prejean as a hero, a wholesome Christian  	girl, and a victim of &#8220;<em>political correctness.</em>&#8220;  Prejean makes  	the rounds, speaking at conservative symposiums, tearfully recalling how she  	believes her First Amendment rights were violated (<em>for the hundredth  	time&#8230;no, Carrie: the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">government</span> never prevented you from exercising  	your free speech</em>).  The Miss California Pageant fires Prejean, and  	wants the money for her boob job back (<em>they paid for it</em>) because  	despite being a &#8220;<em>wholesome Christian girl</em>&#8221; Prejean apparently never  	learned the whole &#8220;<em>Christian-work-ethic-thing,</em>&#8221; and has been ditching  	on her contractual commitments.  Prejean cries &#8220;<em>religious  	discrimination</em>&#8221; and sues the pageant for millions.  	<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/"> A sex tape appears</a>&#8230;when the pageant&#8217;s lawyers bring it to a hearing (<em>ouch</em>).   	Prejean drops her lawsuit&#8230;conservative groups drop her as a guest speaker.   	Prejean tries to get her ex-boyfriend (<em>the source of the tape</em>) to say  	it was from a <strong>LONG</strong> time ago&#8230;he refuses and 	<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/12/carrie-prejeans-ex-boyfriend-sex-tape-lie-age/"> tells TMZ</a> it was from 2007.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Now&#8230;here&#8217;s my favorite part:</strong></span> despite all this, Prejean is <strong>STILL</strong> plugging her new book on the talk  	show rounds, and I guess she just didn&#8217;t figure anybody would ask her about  	the lawsuit, and the reason she had to drop it.  Enjoy this bit from <em> Larry King Live</em>, where Prejean regresses to the level of an  	eight-year-old:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GVwwZ1ZJrkE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GVwwZ1ZJrkE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVwwZ1ZJrkE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVwwZ1ZJrkE</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>LOU DOBBS: DON&#8217;T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU&#8230;</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Lou Dobbs&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/11/lou-dobbs-to-depart-cnn_n_354623.html">has  	quit CNN</a>.   When one examines even just his most awful, most  	racist, most insane moments (<em>much less his consistent stream of  	unresearched, patently false, and journalistically irresponsible claims</em>),  	you are left asking: <strong>Why was he allowed to continue for so long?</strong> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/11/lou-dobbs-most-scandalous_n_354803.html"> Here&#8217;s a compilation</a> of some of Lou&#8217;s worst moments&#8230;CNN is planning to  	replace him with 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/12/john-king-to-replace-lou_n_355199.html"> John King</a>, which can only be an improvement.</li>
</ul>
<p>Tomorrow&#8230;it&#8217;s time for our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition, where  we&#8217;ll try to wrap up all remaining items from the week.  Until then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/political-carnival-five-craziest-things-i-saw-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House v. Fox News &#8211; Unnecessary And Missing The Point</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/white-house-v-fox-news-unnecessary-and-missing-the-point/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/white-house-v-fox-news-unnecessary-and-missing-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbell Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shepard Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valerie Jarrett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally, we'd be running our usual "Chaos Theory Edition," in which we wrap up all of the strange and wonderful political news that we were unable to mention earlier in the week.  But seeing as we were unable to post for the last three days, the list of "things we didn't get to" is, well, everything.  Therefore, we'll focus on a single topic for the day:  New, disheartening, and unnecessary developments in the so-called "War between the White House and FOX News."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally, seeing as it&#8217;s Friday, we&#8217;d be running our usual &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory  Edition</em>,&#8221; in which we wrap up all of the strange and wonderful political  news that we were unable to mention earlier in the week.  But seeing as we  were unable to post for the last three days, the list of &#8220;<em>things we didn&#8217;t  get to</em>&#8221; is&#8230;well&#8230;<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">everything</span></strong>.  Therefore, in the hopes  of doing <strong>ONE</strong> thing well instead of <strong>MANY</strong> things badly, we&#8217;ll focus  on a single topic for the day:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">New, disheartening, and unnecessary  developments in the so-called &#8220;<em>War between the White House and FOX News.&#8221;</em></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start by saying, <strong>THE WHITE HOUSE MADE A MISTAKE</strong>.  First, a  White House aide came forward and said that&#8230;<em>yes</em>&#8230;FOX News is biased,  and often serves as the propaganda wing of the Republican Party.  A brief  summary of the events following this statement may be found <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/white-house-feud-with-fox_n_327314.html"> here</a>.  Recently, another White House advisor, Valerie Jarrett,  performed another disservice to the Office of the President, by reaffirming that  &#8220;<strong>of course</strong>&#8221; FOX News is biased, by hedging on whether or not MSNBC is  biased, and by saying that this was part of the White House&#8217;s ideology of &#8220;<strong>speaking  truth to power:</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ULYycgU8zY4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ULYycgU8zY4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULYycgU8zY4">www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULYycgU8zY4</a></p></p>
<p>Why is all of this behavior, on the part of White House staff, inappropriate?   Is it because they are somehow curtailing the First Amendment?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>No</strong></span>&#8230;they  have prevented no one from speaking.  Is it because this is somehow, <em>as  talking heads on FOX suggest</em>, tyrannical behavior typical of fascist and  communist regimes?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>No</strong></span>&#8230;George W. Bush and the presidents  before him have always been critical of one or more news outlets, and it&#8217;s not  like the government is shutting FOX down and arresting its people.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong> No</strong></span>&#8230;the reason that this is a mistake, is because it is <em>unnecessary</em>.</p>
<p><strong>1)</strong> &#8220;<em>Speaking truth to power?</em>&#8220;  You are the White  House.  You <strong>ARE</strong> &#8220;<em>the power.</em>&#8220;  By stooping to engage a  lesser entity in a verbal sparring match, you miss the obvious opportunity to &#8220;<em>rise  above them</em>&#8221; instead.  Ignoring them, much as one would ignore the  attention-seeking behavior of a screaming child, would serve the image of the  POTUS better.</p>
<p><strong>2)</strong> What you&#8217;ve said is true <em>and obviously so</em>&#8230;but is  pointless, and if anything, will only serve to boost FOX&#8217;s ratings.  <em> Why?</em> Because the people who watch FOX either do so because they <strong> LIKE</strong> that it is biased in such a way as to agree with them, or because they  don&#8217;t watch anything else, in which case they do not know that it is biased, nor  will they ever accept that it is&#8230;because it is the source of <strong>ALL</strong> their  information and it provides the interpretation of said information.</p>
<p>If FOX weren&#8217;t biased&#8230;why would Shepard Smith being receiving so mach hate  mail, and so many threats?  For those who do not recognize the name, Shep  Smith is perhaps the <strong>LEAST</strong> biased anchor on FOX News.  Earlier this  year, Smith grew tired of listening to his guests attempt to justify the  unjustifiable.  He listened to them try to rationalize our country&#8217;s use of  torture, while clumsily dodging the fact that it is not simply immoral&#8230;but  also 100%, clearly, illegal.  When Smith <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/22/shepard-smith-torture_n_190350.html"> had had enough</a>, he erupted: &#8220;<strong>We are America, we don&#8217;t torture! And the  moment that is not the case, I want off the train! This government is of, by,  and for the people&#8230;.I&#8217;m saying, whatever it is, you don&#8217;t do it for me</strong>.&#8221;   This is the same Shepard Smith, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/02/shepard-smith-calls-chene_n_210498.html"> accurately identified</a> former Vice President Cheney&#8217;s stance on gay rights,  especially given the fact that his daughter is gay, as a &#8220;<strong>cop out.</strong>&#8220;   Smith also questioned the fairness of a story which criticized the Canadian  health care system while attempting to discredit the current plans in our  country to reform health care&#8230;and he rightly <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/28/shep-smith-was-that-canad_n_302399.html"> pointed out</a> that the proposed reforms in the U.S., have absolutely <strong> NOTHING</strong> in common with the Canadian system.  Quite recently, Smith <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/27/shep-smith-apologizes-for_n_336231.html"> apologized</a> after a segment where a Republican candidate was interviewed, but  the Democratic candidate was not: &#8220;<strong>Wow. I didn&#8217;t know that was about to  happen. My apologies for the lack of balance there. If I&#8217;d had control it  wouldn&#8217;t have happened.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>Want to know something about FOX News&#8217; viewers?  Want to know how one  anchor&#8217;s attempts to remain objective and squelch bias on that network were  rewarded?  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/business/media/22smith.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"> He is attacked</a>&#8230;threatened by viewers of the network, told by viewers, &#8220;<strong>You  don&#8217;t belong here,</strong>&#8221; and harassed in public.  Do these sound like the  kind of people who will respond to the White House&#8217;s criticism by changing  channels?  Do they sound like people who will come to say, &#8220;<em>Wow.   We had no idea that FOX was so unbalanced.  We are upset that they are  distorting the news in order to communicate conservative dogma and ideology.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>No.</strong></span> They&#8217;ll keep watching FOX News.  They&#8217;ll watch  it because it agrees with them&#8230;because it tells them what they want to  hear&#8230;and because it plays into their psychological defense mechanisms.   That&#8217;s right.  There <strong>IS</strong> actually a psychological explanation for  much of the unreasonable &#8220;<em>outrage</em>&#8221; and the inexplicable &#8220;<em>conspiracy  theorizing</em>&#8221; that we are all observing.  <a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200909/field-guide-the-conspiracy-theorist-dark-minds"> A brief article</a> in <em>Psychology Today,</em> sums up this all-too-human  phenomenon quite clearly.  In short&#8230;the human brain <strong>WANTS</strong> to make  connections between events and other things in our environment.  It is part  of the way that our minds detect threats, and so the brain rewards this behavior  with the release of dopamine.  In other words, it feels good to <em>&#8220;connect  the dots.</em>&#8220;  In times of high uncertainty and stress&#8230;like say, a  recession characterized by financial instability, high foreclosure rates, and  rampant unemployment&#8230;or perhaps the election of a president who some view as &#8220;<em>strange</em>&#8221;  and/or &#8220;<em>different</em>&#8220;&#8230;our brains may tend to go into overdrive, drawing  connections between as many things in our world as possible, in hopes of  identifying threats to our lives, our security, our comfort.  Here&#8217;s a fun  example from Glenn Beck, who has provided us <span style="text-decoration: underline;">many</span> such examples:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xWL-pfCao-U&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xWL-pfCao-U&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWL-pfCao-U">www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWL-pfCao-U</a></p></p>
<p>What should be obvious, is that such theorizing is not created through sound  reasoning&#8230;and it is, therefore, impervious to facts and reasoning.  For  example, if I take the unreasonable position that I was abducted by aliens and  replaced by an identical pod person&#8230;you are going to have more than a little  difficultly &#8220;<em>disproving</em>&#8221; this, simply because there is nothing factual or  logical in it for you to address.  &#8220;Conspiracy thinking&#8221; is this way <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> because</span> is not the product of logical thinking&#8230;<strong>but is instead produced  through a powerful defense mechanism</strong>.  This should be apparent to  anyone who has attempted to &#8220;<em>talk down</em>&#8221; such a theorist through the  communication of facts, or by pointing out that some of their &#8220;<em>relationships</em>&#8221;  or &#8220;<em>lines of causation</em>&#8221; don&#8217;t make any sense.  The scholar&#8217;s  reaction to such questioning would be <em>engagement, and excitement</em>.   The conspiracy theorists reaction&#8230;<em>is heightened defensivenes</em>s<em>, or  even combativeness</em>.  Your attempt to reason with them is a threat to  the delicate and implausible &#8220;<em>early warning system</em>&#8221; they have  meticulously built for themselves.  As crazy as it sounds&#8230;they feel safer  thinking that the threat to their existence is a &#8220;<em>president who is a secret  Muslim trying to form a communist shadow government</em>&#8220;&#8230;then for this <strong>NOT</strong> to be the case, and for them <strong>NOT</strong> to have any idea where actual threats  might exist, which would make them feel blind and vulnerable.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, all this introspection into &#8220;<em>why people think what they  think</em>&#8221; is lost in the media circus engaged in covering this minor and  unnecessary dispute.  CNN, its ratings in the basement, decides <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/28/campbell-brown-hits-white_n_337889.html"> to get in on the action</a> by crying out (<em>I&#8217;m paraphrasing</em>), &#8220;<em>MSNBC  is as bad as FOX.</em>&#8220;  A little transparent, even for you, Miss Campbell  Brown.  Of course, Keith Olbermann can&#8217;t resist responding back to CNN&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/28/olbermann-compares-cnn-to_n_337346.html">pointing  out</a> that &#8220;<strong>CNN seems to still think it is the primary source for its  viewers, that they know nothing until they tune in.  This is, ever  increasingly, nonsensical. People now watch news on TV for elucidation and  context and analysis. They have brought the facts with them, the way we used to  bring TV dinners</strong>.&#8221;  Meanwhile, no one is examining why people watch FOX  News at all&#8230;and why so many are willing to believe some of the obvious  falsehoods and patently inane conspiracy theories espoused on the network.   Maybe&#8230;it&#8217;s as simple as the psychology of a scared human being reacting to  change and uncertain times.  Whatever it is&#8230;nobody is better than FOX  News at exploiting it, as Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em> explains:</p>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:253738" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:253738" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/white-house-v-fox-news-unnecessary-and-missing-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Waterboarding Grandkids, Possum Meat, Nazi Golfers</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Castellanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Values Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Ratigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keep American Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcia Greenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF's weekly "Chaos Theory Edition" where we wrap up the remaining strange news items from the week.  Only four categories this week, but lots of links and clips.  Let's get started...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF&#8217;s  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; where we wrap up the remaining strange news  items from the week.</p>
<p>Only four categories this week&#8230;but lots of links, so <em>let&#8217;s get started</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>We&#8217;ve all been witness to the GOP&#8217;s recent &#8220;<em>enlightenment</em>&#8221;  	regarding the nation&#8217;s debt.  For the last eight years, while they held  	the reins of Congress, the rampant government spending was &#8220;<em>absolutely  	necessary</em>.&#8221;  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now:</span></strong> It&#8217;s the equivalent of kicking our  	grandchildren in the teeth.  Or, as Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma)  	recently put it, it&#8217;s the equivalent of &#8220;<strong>waterboarding</strong>&#8221; them.  	<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62973-its-coburn-vs-krugman-on-spending"> Coburn said</a>, &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;re going to waterboard them.  We&#8217;re going to  	flood them with debt.</strong>&#8220;  Senator Coburn was referring to a program  	funding the study of political science, which 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/08/coburn-political-science/"> Coburn claims is not necessary</a>&#8230;since people can learn all that  	they need to know about politics from <strong>CABLE NEWS</strong>.  It&#8217;s suddenly  	quite obvious where <strong>HE</strong> learned most of what <strong>HE</strong> knows  	about it&#8230;</li>
<li>It&#8217;s an established fact that Republicans have had some difficulty  	adjusting to the &#8220;<em>internet age</em>&#8220;&#8230;perhaps best displayed by the fact  	that most of them don&#8217;t seem to realize that if they say something that  	directly contradicts what they said one year ago, the clip of both  	statements will be on <em>YouTube</em> before the day is out.  Want to  	see a slideshow of the &#8220;<em>Top Nine Republican Internet Fails</em>?&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/republican-internet-fails_n_319574.html"> Here you go</a>&#8230;</li>
<li>The number one problem with allying oneself with a minority of loud,  	activist, ignorant, and unreasonable people&#8230;is that you suddenly lose the  	support of the much larger body of normal, moderate, sane folks.  Want  	to see what happens if you try to win the moderate people back by behaving  	like a reasonable human being, open to compromise and the good ideas of  	others?  Watch here as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) finds out what  	happens when the lunatics figure out that you are not really one of them:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Liz Cheney is not quite done fighting her father&#8217;s battles&#8230;no matter  	how many times she appears on discussion panels and is identified as having  	the foreign policy knowledge of a teenager.  Now 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28212.html">she has  	formed</a> the &#8220;<em>Keep America Safe</em>&#8221; organization, whose mission  	statement claims to support &#8220;<strong>an unapologetic approach to fighting  	terrorism around the world, for victory in the wars this country fights, for  	democracy and human rights, and for a strong American military that is  	needed in the dangerous world in which we live.</strong>&#8220;  Ms.  	Cheney&#8230;first of all, even if we look only at the fact that planes have not  	crashed into buildings this year, President Obama <strong>ALREADY</strong> has a  	better track record than your father had, in terms of keeping the country  	safe.  Secondly, Obama has succeeded in gaining international allies  	in the struggle against terrorists&#8230;allies that your father helped to  	alienate.  And third, well, I think the DNC put it best in their  	response: &#8220;<strong>Last fall, the American people overwhelmingly rejected a  	radical foreign policy authored by Dick Cheney that alienated our allies,  	emboldened our enemies, depleted our resources, distracted our focus and  	made the nation less secure. The Cheneys lost that debate and their approach  	was deemed a failure. The Cheneys can continue to focus on securing their  	sullied legacy if they want to. But, the President will continue to focus on  	securing the country.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Exactly</em>.</li>
<li>Retaining his crown as &#8220;<em>King of the Bizarre Analogy</em>,&#8221; RNC  	Chariman Michael Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/michael-steele-cow-on-the_n_321121.html"> said in a recent FOX interview</a> that he feels like&#8230;well&#8230;health care  	reform is a &#8220;<strong>train</strong>,&#8221; and President Obama is the conductor, and Obama  	is trying to get all the Republicans to get on board, and Steele sees  	himself as a &#8220;<strong>cow on the tracks.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Ok, sure.</em></li>
<li>I mentioned in a previous post, one way that you know that the GOP is  	focused on simply <strong>OPPOSING EVERYTHING</strong> is when a number of GOP  	legislators vote against Senator Franken&#8217;s first bill:  a bill <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> protecting rape victims</span>, working for companies with government  	contracts.  Here&#8217;s Jon Stewart, who points out what should be an  	obvious truth: &#8220;<strong>If, to protect Halliburton, you have to side against rape  	victims, you might want to rethink your allegiances.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>It recently came to light, in part because of the work done by the  	National Women&#8217;s Law Center, that in eight states, insurance companies can  	and do consider being the victim of spousal abuse a &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition</em>&#8221; that allows them to deny coverage.  State and  	Federal representatives from most of the eight states expressed immediate  	embarrassment and outrage over the situation, and most have already taken  	steps to remedy the matter. <strong>But not Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</strong>.   	When the president of the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, Marcia Greenberger, 	<a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_10_15/2009_10_15.html"> appeared before a Senate committee</a> to discuss the issue, Burr thought it  	appropriate to repeatedly interrupt and otherwise disrespect her:</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>:  If I could  get back to your question about the specific examples: they manifest themselves  in many different ways. For example, if a woman ends up in an emergency room  with cuts, bruises, broken arms, black eyes, typical injuries that result from  domestic violence, we know of instances where women are being denied insurance  coverage and neither the insurance company&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: My question&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;doesn&#8217;t view  that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;is specifically about  North Carolina&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;and I&#8217;m trying  to answer that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;and the insurance  commissioner tells me we haven&#8217;t had a case. We haven&#8217;t had anybody&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: Well, I&#8217;m trying  to explain. First, I think it&#8217;s great that he is now explicitly having a rule,  which as our report pointed out, didn&#8217;t exist before. So that&#8217;s really  excellent, because of the way insurance companies deal with this issue in  particular. They will often deny the coverage of victims and survivors of  domestic violence without saying that that&#8217;s the reason&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;I&#8217;m just going by  your report&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: You asked the  question about did we follow up and we did. </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: Well, I found more  information in my one call to North Carolina than I think your report did. </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Again?</em> Representative Bill Otto (R-Kansas) has obviously  	not been paying attention.  First he 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a video</a> on YouTube titled &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he raps (<em>and  	badly</em>) his various criticisms of President Obama, and about eating  	opossum, which he calls &#8220;<strong>the other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;  This obviously  	drew allegations of racism (<em>at a minimum it is childish, insensitive, and  	inane</em>), and eventually the clip was removed from the site.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/bill-otto-says-he-will-re_n_323686.html"> And now</a>&#8230;Otto says he&#8217;s going to repost the video, because it was his  	adult daughters who took the video down, and also because he fears that &#8220;<strong>People  	are going to think that this was done by people to shut me up.  I&#8217;m  	getting hate e-mails from Maryland to California, but, hey, that&#8217;s part of  	the game.</strong>&#8220;  Mr. Otto:  It&#8217;s not a <em>game</em>, it&#8217;s civil  	service and <strong>YOU</strong> are an elected official, <em>jackass</em>.  Next  	time, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">listen to your daughters</span>&#8230;and try to learn from the lessons of  	other, like the <strong>OTHER</strong> Kansas legislator who just recently got in a  	heap of trouble 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Kansas_Rep_GOP_needs_great_white_hope.html"> for saying</a> that the GOP is looking for a &#8220;<strong>great white hope</strong>&#8221; to  	defeat Obama.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Want the &#8220;<em>short version</em>&#8221; of the merry war between the White House  	and <em>FOX News</em>?  Here goes&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>WHITE HOUSE:</strong></span> FOX News <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/anita-dunn-fox-news-an-ou_n_316691.html"> serves as the propaganda arm</a> of the Republican Party.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BILL O&#8217;REILLY:</strong></span> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bill-oreilly-glenn-beck-d_n_318085.html"> Nuh uh</a>&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA MATTERS:</strong></span> Umm&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/fox_news_channel?tab=all">it&#8217;s  pretty obvious</a>, guys&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GLENN BECK:</strong></span> The administration is like the Nazis&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/glenn-beck-compares-fox-n_n_318784.html">and  we&#8217;re the Jews</a>!</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NEW STUDY:</strong></span> Not only is it true, but we found something  interesting:  Most of the anti-Obama forces aren&#8217;t particularly  racist&#8230;the only thing they have in common is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/gop-base-driven-by-bizarr_n_323796.html"> they all watch FOX News</a>, and because of this&#8230;<em>they believe some pretty  outlandish sh-t.</em></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s fun picking on CNN&#8217;s inability to both perform research and report  	news.  It&#8217;s especially fun&#8230;if you&#8217;re Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember the rather bizarre reactions from some members of the media  	when Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize?  Well, Rachel Maddow thinks it  	can all be explained by &#8220;<em>Obama Derangement Syndrome:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>By now you&#8217;ve heard that the Senate Finance Committee managed to pass  	the &#8220;<em>Baucus Bill.</em>&#8220;  You also heard that Republican Olympia Snowe  	(R-Maine) voted along with the Democrats to send the bill on.  And  	recently, 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33308113/ns/politics-health_care_reform/"> it may have come to your attention</a> that another Maine Republican,  	Senator Susan Collins, may also lend her support for the bill.  Well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/exclusive-moveon-whacks-f_n_318640.html"> MoveOn.org</a>, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal  	Employees, the AFL-CIO, and the Communications Workers of America would like  	to remind you:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/senate-health-bill-oppose_n_318920.html"> it&#8217;s a CRAPPY bill</a>, that would make a mountain of money for the  	insurance companies, would change little in the way they do business, and  	would <strong>NOT</strong> serve to get all of America&#8217;s uninsured the health care coverage  	that they need.  In fact&#8230;any <strong>OTHER</strong> House and Senate version  	might just be a better choice.</li>
<li><strong><em>Thank you, Captain Obvious:</em></strong> The most ridiculously  	unnecessary headline in health care reform news 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/13/AR2009101303472.html">comes courtesy</a> of <em>The Washington  	Post</em>:  &#8220;<strong>Health Insurers Emerge as Obama&#8217;s Top Foe in Reform  	Effort.</strong>&#8221; That&#8217;s right&#8230;.&#8221;<em>emerging</em>&#8220;&#8230;as if it weren&#8217;t  	always the case.</li>
<li>Think only our elected officials are in the pocket of the health  	insurance industry&#8230;but our stalwart media will be there to keep us  	informed of the truth regarding the health care debate.  <em>Maybe not.</em> CNN contributor, Alex Castellanos&#8230;has been 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140037">revealed</a> to be  	connected at the hip with America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (<em>AHIP</em>),  	the monolithic insurance lobby currently (<em>and ferociously</em>)  	campaigning to kill reform legislation.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t generally hear about &#8220;<em>progressive faith groups</em>,&#8221; but  	the <em>American Values Network</em> aims to change that.  They are 	<a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/healthcare/faces-ad/">currently  	releasing ads</a>&#8230;emphasizing the moral and religious arguments supporting  	heath care reform.  It&#8217;s not a difficult argument to make, and  	represents one of the best examples of &#8220;<em>fighting fire with fire</em>&#8221; that  	we have seen in a long time.</li>
<li>Is it obvious that former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has a new  	book out?  Not only has he been making the usual talk show rounds, but  	he also managed to inject a little sanity into the health care debate.   	Of right-wing assertions that the Obama plan represents &#8220;<em>socialized  	medicine</em>&#8221; and warrants comparisons to Britain, Canada, and France, Frist 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3tLHqGz7uE&amp;feature=player_embedded"> said on C-SPAN</a>, &#8220;<strong>What the Obama administration is doing is not  	socialized medicine.  Socialized medicine is where the government owns  	the hospitals, owns the doctors, and decides how people get paid.</strong>&#8220;   	Yes&#8230;thank you&#8230;<em>finally</em>&#8230;is everybody listening?</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>In Lakeville, Massachusetts, someone 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/10/13/swastika-obama-carved-int_ws_319331.html"> carved a swastika</a> and the word &#8220;<strong>Obama</strong>&#8221; into a golf course green.   	The course manager believes that someone used either a cleated golf shoe  	or some other tool to perform the vandalism.  Strange&#8230;one would certainly think  	that America&#8217;s golfers have had some extra time to get used to the idea of  	having a very popular, half African-American leader.</li>
<li><em><strong>NEW HERO:</strong></em> Dylan Ratigan hosts the &#8220;<em>Morning Meeting</em>&#8221;  	show on MSNBC, and lately has shown to be a tough, bright host&#8230;who knows  	how to play hardball.  In 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/dylan-ratigan-to-chamber_n_320397.html"> a recent interview</a> with Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S.  	Chamber of Commerce, Ratigan responded to Donohue&#8217;s attempts to claim that  	free, unfettered enterprise has the solutions to all problems by saying, &#8220;<strong>unless  	the government and people like you that lobby to the exemptions that allow  	banks to [speculate with taxpayer money] get out of the way, we will never  	have fair play again in this country and we&#8217;ll have job creation by virtue  	of taxpayer theft, which is ultimately destructive, and I would argue,  	treasonous to this country.</strong>&#8220;  When Donohue complained that, in  	essence, it&#8217;s harder to spread economic propaganda when the host asks hard  	questions, Ratigan responded, &#8220;<strong>Yes, it is.  Especially when you talk  	nonsense.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em><strong>Oh no they didn&#8217;t:</strong></em> The White House decided to take a  	play out of the &#8220;<em>Sarah Palin Media Strategy</em>&#8221; book, when confronted  	with the mounting criticism in the blogosphere regarding the  	administration&#8217;s failure to achieve civil rights goals for gay citizens.   	NBC White House Correspondent John Harwood 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-furious-at-white_n_317424.html"> reported</a>, &#8220;<strong>For a sign of how seriously the White House does or  	doesn&#8217;t take this opposition, one adviser told me today those bloggers need  	to take off their pajamas, get dressed and realize that governing a  	closely-divided country is complicated and difficult.</strong>&#8220;  <em> Caaaarefullll</em>.  Remember the role bloggers played getting Obama <em> into</em> the White House?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>UPDATE:</strong></span> The White House 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/white-house-disavows-claim-that-gay-critics-bloggers-are-part-of-internet-left-fringe/"> would like to disavow those comments</a>&#8230;never happened&#8230;nothing to see  	here.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now what could we possibly add to all that?  As CNN would say, we&#8217;ll &#8220;<em>leave  it there</em>&#8221; for now&#8230;and see you back here on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

