<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; David Letterman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/david-letterman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Soon-To-Be-Ex-Governor Palin: Stick A Fork In Her Fellas&#8230;She&#8217;s Done</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Ed Rendell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Murkowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/modules/wordpress/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re back! After a week of vacation, and a week of playing catch-up at work, I am finally in a position to take some time to do a quick posting. The links have been stacking up&#8230;so I think I&#8217;ll just clear the slate, and choose one thing to focus on for the first day back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We&#8217;re back!</strong> After a week of vacation, and a week of playing catch-up at  work, I am finally in a position to take some time to do a quick posting.   The links have been stacking up&#8230;so I think I&#8217;ll just clear the slate, and  choose one thing to focus on for the first day back at it.</p>
<p>And that one subject&#8230;would have to be <strong>SARAH PALIN</strong>&#8230;</p>
<p>I have so much material, that I think it&#8217;s probably impossible to weave these  into any sort of cogent narrative.  So, I guess I&#8217;ll simply try to  categorize and summarize as best as I am able:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE BOMBSHELL RESIGNATION:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>On July 3rd, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin shocked <strong>EVERYBODY</strong> by  	announcing that she not only wouldn&#8217;t run for another term as governor&#8230;but  	she also <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>wouldn&#8217;t even be finishing her first term</strong></span>.  She plans to leave  	office on July 26 to pursue&#8230;<em>well</em>&#8230;keep reading.  The full video and  	written transcript of her announcement can be found 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/03/sarah-palin-resignation-s_n_225557.html"> here</a>.  The speech&#8230;was <em>classic</em> Palin.  It was badly written,  	rambling on-and-on without much in the way of an organized structure.  It  	was badly delivered&#8230;breathlessly spewed forth in a torrent of incomplete  	sentences and rambling tangents.  There was also an obvious  	disregard for atmosphere reminiscent of Sarah&#8217;s ill-fated Thanksgiving  	interview in front of a slaughtering table &#8211; She chose to deliver the  	announcement in an area populated by loudly (<em>and somewhat comically</em>)  	honking geese, and these surroundings lent a somewhat distracting and  	surreal feel to the whole event.</li>
<li>According to Sarah&#8230;she&#8217;s leaving because of the distraction presented  	by all of the  	ethics charges against her&#8230;and the cost of defending against those  	charges&#8230;and she&#8217;s not finishing her term, but she&#8217;s not quitting, because  	she&#8217;s going to keep on &#8220;<em>fighting</em>&#8220;&#8230;but she won&#8217;t say what she will be  	fighting, or how, just that she&#8217;s not really &#8220;<em>quitting</em>&#8221; because she&#8217;ll still  	be &#8220;<em>fighting</em>.&#8221;  She later responded that it has been considered  	&#8220;<strong>honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher  	calling.</strong>&#8221;  No word as to what this higher calling might be&#8230;McCain 	<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5624MB20090704">seems  	to think</a> she will serve as some sort of Republican leadership  	figure, however, most experts see her political future as bleak.  Governor Mike Huckabee 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/05/huckabee-palin-may-not-be_n_225863.html"> says those very ethics charges</a> and her decision to leave office mid-term  	nearly negate the chances of a future presidential run.  Even Karl Rove, who  	get get conservatives to vote for a dead cat, thinks her &#8220;<em>strategy</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31753561/ns/politics-more_politics/">is  	risky and that her options are few</a>.</li>
<li>And Sarah also wants us to know that she&#8217;s really not walking out on her  	responsibilities&#8230;because he &#8220;<em>lame-duck</em>&#8221; status prevents her from getting  	any real work done.  Unfortunately for Sarah, <strong>NOBODY</strong> considers halfway  	through one&#8217;s first term a &#8220;<em>lame-duck</em>&#8221; period&#8230;in fact, this is a period  	where a governor <strong>SHOULD</strong> be able to accomplish quite a bit.  The  	Alaskans who elected her are 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31756939/ns/politics-more_politics/"> more than a little disappointed</a>&#8230;since they elected her hoping she  	would perform some <span style="text-decoration: underline;">actual</span> work.   In fact, one legislator  	spoke of Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>surprising amount of disinterest in state government  	after November&#8230;This state has a lot of problems, and she showed a complete  	lack of interest in solving them.</strong>&#8221;  Alaska&#8217;s Republican Senator  	Lisa Murkowski 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/L_Murkowski_Deeply_disappointed_Palin_has_decided_to_abandon_the_state_.html?showall"> was even harsher</a> in her criticism of Palin&#8217;s move: &#8220;<strong>I am deeply  	disappointed that the Governor has decided to abandon the State and her  	constituents before her term has concluded.</strong>&#8221; Governor Ed Rendell,  	(D-Penn) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/rendell-lays-into-palin-c_n_226438.html"> took offense</a>&#8230;criticizing her characterization of lame-duck governors,  	her designation of herself as such, and her choice to leave office during a  	recession: &#8220;<strong>To resign after two-and-a-half years in office and somehow to  	say that she was going to be a lame duck and lame ducks can&#8217;t get anything  	done and governors just go on junkets during her lame-duck period is  	ridiculous.  First of all, she&#8217;s a first-term governor, not a  	term-limited, second-term governor, and if she hadn&#8217;t announced she was  	leaving, she wouldn&#8217;t have been a lame duck, she would have been in a pretty  	strong executive position, number one. Number two, this is not the time for  	governors to abandon their states&#8230;Everyone of us is facing severe  	financial challenges brought about by the international recession and this  	is not a time to leave. We pledged to our folks when we asked them to elect  	to us, we pledged that we were going to serve four years and we serve in the  	good years, but we also serve in the bad years as well. And for her to leave  	and turn the state over to a lieutenant governor with less than a month&#8217;s  	notice, in the midst of difficult financial times, I think it&#8217;s just dead  	wrong.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Oh, and  	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/Palin_hammers_media_hints_at_national_ambitions.html?showall">it&#8217;s the media&#8217;s fault</a>, too.   	According to Palin, the mainstream media has been completely unfair to her  	and her family, they would not have gone after any other candidate the way  	they have pursued her&#8230;and she would still like to be in front of the  	cameras and allowed to talk as much as possible and if all the members of  	the mainstream press wouldn&#8217;t mind coming to see her fishing at the  	shoreline, she&#8217;d like to talk to all of them.  She said this&#8230;as she  	alluded to her future political aspirations: &#8220;<strong>How sad that Washington and  	the media will never understand; it’s about country&#8230;And though it&#8217;s  	honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher calling  	and without finishing a term, of course we know by now, for some reason a  	different standard applies for the decisions I make.</strong>&#8221;  You know&#8230;I  	could quote from this wonderful article, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/the-myth-of-how-the-media_b_226136.html"> dispelling the myth</a> that the media has been somehow &#8220;<em>harder</em>&#8221; on  	Palin&#8230;or I could show 	<a href="http://wonkette.com/409665/sarah-palins-advice-for-lady-politicians-ignore-mean-old-media"> this clip</a> from August of last year where Sarah chastises Hillary Clinton  	for &#8220;<em>whining</em>&#8221; about the media, and says that it &#8220;<em>bothers her</em>&#8221;  	when female politicians proclaim themselves victims of the press.   	Instead&#8230;I&#8217;ll call it what it is: <strong>cry-baby bullshit</strong>.  No,  	Sarah, you don&#8217;t get to pop out of nowhere as a virtual unknown, and run for  	Vice President&#8230;with a radicalized, secessionist husband&#8230;and an unwed,  	pregnant daughter&#8230;and ties to extreme, evangelical religion&#8230;and a  	history of abuse of power and ethics complaints&#8230;and a history of taking  	huge amounts of public money to fund failed projects&#8230;and then proceed to  	go ill-prepared into debates and interviews where you <strong>CONTINUALLY</strong> reveal your general lack of education, lack of knowledge of government, and  	lack of reasoning skills&#8230;<strong>AND THEN COMPLAIN THAT THE MEDIA IS TREATING  	YOU DIFFERENTLY</strong>.  The media would treat any candidate in the same  	situation, with the same background, and who exercises the same poor  	judgment the <strong>SAME WAY</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES &#8211; WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND THIS?</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Unconfirmed gossip</strong>:  let&#8217;s get this out of the way&#8230;some  	have said that Sarah was trying to get ahead of the results of very damaging  	federal investigation&#8230;however the FBI says it is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">in no way</span> investigating Palin.  If there is some damning piece of gossip or some  	pending investigation&#8230;there&#8217;s no proof of it.  Others have said Palin  	wishes to continue to 	<a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/309/story/68034.html">pursue lucrative  	book deals</a>&#8230;maybe even a position on Fox News or some other  	conservative outlet as a contributor.  Again, even if this is the  	case&#8230;there&#8217;s no evidence to support it, other than the face that she has  	signed a memoir deal with HarperCollins Publishers, which is a pretty  	standard practice for politicians.</li>
<li><strong>Presidential Run</strong>:  As mentioned earlier&#8230;even Huckabee,  	Rove, and a wealth of other Republicans and GOP campaign advisors think  	Sarah&#8217;s chances of a 2012 presidential run are <strong>SLIM</strong>.  However&#8230;<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-07-07-palin-poll_N.htm">polls  	show</a> that a majority of self-identified Republican voters would still  	vote for her for president (<em>of course, with self-identified Democrats and  	Independents&#8230;not so much</em>).  I&#8217;ll just say this:  I have a  	good friend who I consider to be a very intelligent conservative.  Back  	during the last election, he defended Palin to me&#8230;saying that it is not so  	important that she is not very intelligent, because her &#8220;<em>charm</em>&#8221; is  	such a powerful tool.  This same friend&#8230;posted on Facebook recently  	that he believes Palin should step out of the spotlight, because her  	intelligence is obviously <strong>SO LOW</strong> as to not even meet the minimum  	requirements for the presidential office.  I&#8217;m glad to see he has come  	around and finally grasped what I hold to be an obvious truth.</li>
<li><strong>Maybe she&#8217;s just nuts</strong>:  no article did so much to damage  	Sarah Palin as Todd Purdom&#8217;s opus for <em>Vanity Fair</em> titled &#8220;<em>It Came  	From Wasilla.</em>&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/sarah-palin200908"> I highly recommend reading the entire piece</a>.  The article forced a 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24392.html">major  	division</a> in the GOP&#8230;between those who were willing to admit to the  	horrific strategic mistake that was choosing Sarah Palin as the VP  	candidate, and those still blinded by&#8230;well, <em>whatever</em>.  In  	short (<em>I mean <span style="text-decoration: underline;">really</span> short, given Purdom&#8217;s article is 10,000 words  	long</em>) Palin appears to be not very bright, not very experienced, not  	very savvy&#8230;and perhaps just a bit nuts: &#8220;<strong>Several told me, independently  	of one another, that they had consulted the definition of ‘narcissistic  	personality disorder’ in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental  	Disorders &#8211; ‘a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior),  	need for admiration, and lack of empathy’ &#8211; and thought it fit her  	perfectly.</strong>&#8221;  Or maybe Liz Trotta, a contributor for Fox News, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/fox-news-contributor-rips_n_226370.html"> put it best the other day</a> when she said, &#8220;<strong>the woman is inarticulate,  	undereducated&#8230;I think all the liberal stylists&#8230;really have a case. She  	just begs for adjectives like flaky and wacky&#8230;We&#8217;re talking about somebody  	who, right from the get-go, has been a flashy person who gets into a lot of  	trouble and really has no credentials for any job.</strong>&#8221;  Wow&#8230;well  	said, Liz.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE ENSUING LAUGHTER:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Seeing as Sarah&#8217;s announcement comes so close on the heels of her spat  	with David Letterman&#8230;one can hardly fault him for taking a parting  	shot&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">or twelve</span>.  Here&#8217;s his Top Ten list of messages on Palin&#8217;s  	answering machine.  <strong>Enjoy.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jcWf4__Fybs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jcWf4__Fybs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course, Keith Olbermann couldn&#8217;t resist a bit of tongue-in-cheek  	analysis of these developments&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/07/olbermann-tackles-palins_n_227471.html">here is his segment</a> titled appropriately &#8220;<em>Palin&#8217;s  	Paling Prospects.</em>&#8221;  It mostly revolves around Andrea Mitchell&#8217;s  	interview with Palin at the water&#8217;s edge (<em>Palin had just stepped out of a  	fishing boat&#8230;hip waders and all</em>)&#8230;where Palin continues to flounder (<em>no  	fishing pun intended</em>) while attempting to explain both her motives and her  	ambitions.  For me, the highlight is when Sarah refers to the federal  	government&#8217;s &#8220;<em>Department of Law,</em>&#8221; once again reminding me of how close we  	came to having this woman as Vice President&#8230;a person who has no knowledge  	of how our government or laws <span style="text-decoration: underline;">actually</span> work.  And here&#8230;is a  	brief Palin retrospective:</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mh1umqieC7w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mh1umqieC7w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that we will have no more need for my regular &#8220;<em>Palinwatch</em>&#8221; segments,  but the truth (<em>and you and I both know it</em>) is that she&#8217;s not going <strong>ANYWHERE</strong> and  we will certainly hear from her again&#8230;for better or worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

