<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; death panels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/death-panels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition:  More Death, Heckling the Disabled, and Indoctrination</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Pallone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenna Hager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Batiromo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, yours truly has been down for the count all week with the nasty head cold making the rounds in Nashville...so let's try to wrap things up with our weekly edition of Chaos Theory...here's what I've collected over the last five days.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yours truly has been down for the count all week with the nasty head  cold making the rounds in Nashville&#8230;so let&#8217;s try to wrap things up with our  weekly edition of <em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8230;here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve collected over the last five days</em>:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HEALTHCARE -- THE DEBATE THAT&#8217;S KILLING US SLOWLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Despite the thorough, public debunking of the ridiculous &#8220;<em>death panel</em>&#8221;  	claims, and the fact that even the right-wing press outlets aren&#8217;t  	mentioning the conspiracy theory anymore, some politicians <strong>may not have  	received the memo</strong>.  Representative Pete Olson (R-TX) was holding a  	recent town hall meeting, and he told the crowd about a girl named &#8220;<em>Britney</em>.&#8221;   	The girl&#8217;s unborn child was found to have a heart defect&#8230;and despite her  	best efforts she couldn&#8217;t find a doctor to treat her baby until she located  	a remote, out-of-state specialist.  Olson goes on to claim&#8230;that in  	any proposed &#8220;<em>government-run</em>&#8221; system, the baby would have died for  	lack of treatment.  The crowd, who apparently <strong>HAD</strong> received the  	memo&#8230;and who knew that these types of claims are false and intended only  	to scare them&#8230;proceeded to boo Representative Olson, and shouted, &#8220;<strong>Oh  	Jesus Christ, that&#8217;s terrible</strong>,&#8221; and, &#8220;<strong>That&#8217;s not true!</strong>&#8220;  To  	these people, Olson nonsensically responded, &#8220;<strong>For those of you who say  	it&#8217;s not true, don&#8217;t talk to me, talk to Britney</strong>.&#8221;  Wait&#8230;<em>what</em>?</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_MvNF2GUE0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1&amp;feature=player_embedded" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_MvNF2GUE0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1&amp;feature=player_embedded" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_MvNF2GUE0">www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_MvNF2GUE0</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee&#8230;not only didn&#8217;t get the &#8220;<em>mentioning-death-panels-now-makes-you-look-like-an-idiot</em>&#8221;  	memo, but he also decided that merely repeating a claim that has been proven  	false&#8230;<em>wasn&#8217;t quite tacky enough</em>.  So Huckabee 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/28/huckabee-kennedy-would-ha_n_271605.html"> went on his radio show</a> and suggested that the recently departed Senator  	Kennedy&#8230;would have been urged to &#8220;<strong>go home to take pain pills and die</strong>&#8221;  	under Obama&#8217;s reform plan.  And we&#8217;ll add some more &#8220;<em>tackiness  	points</em>&#8221; since Huckabee, just last week, chided Democrats for what he  	perceived as them using Ted Kennedy&#8217;s death to advance the cause of reform.  	<strong>Oh Mike: </strong> it&#8217;s just as sick to use his name <strong>AGAINST</strong> reform&#8230;especially when you consider health care reform was his <strong>LIFELONG</strong> goal.</li>
<li>Generally, I don&#8217;t pass on &#8220;<em>moving stories that explain the need for  	Health Care Reform.</em>&#8220;  Except, in this case, the story is a lot more  	&#8220;<em>illuminating</em>&#8221; than it is &#8220;<em>moving</em>,&#8221; and it represents yet  	another deficiency of our current system that most people are not aware of.   	You probably <span style="text-decoration: underline;">did</span> know, that nearly 68% of all bankruptcies in America  	result from medical costs.  What you may not know&#8230;is that many  	divorces are also caused by a mixture of financial and medical necessity.   	Case in point, 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/opinion/30kristof.html?_r=1">read  	this story</a>&#8230;<strong>it&#8217;s actually quite common:</strong> husband develops  	debilitating disease, doctors shock wife by suggesting she immediately get a  	divorce or she will lose everything, wife consults lawyers who confirm what  	the doctors are saying, wife has a terrible choice to make&#8230;leave her  	husband or lose all their savings, retirement, and property.</li>
<li><strong>Interesting:</strong> I&#8217;m first to admit that I am no expert on  	taxes.  But it is interesting to note, 	<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/214267?from=rss">as this columnist does</a>,  	that while Republicans have been heavily utilizing the &#8220;<em>health care  	reform will urge grandma to die sooner</em>&#8221; attack&#8230;many past tax bills (<em>sponsored  	by Republicans, and notably one Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA)</em>) have done  	just that:  <strong>urged grandma to die sooner</strong>.  In addition to  	initiating tax changes that penalize seniors for living longer, Republicans  	have supported companies that swindled seniors out of their retirement money  	(<em>they dismiss it as &#8220;that&#8217;s the way the free market cookie crumbles!&#8221;</em>),  	and they refuse to let more money go into Alzheimer&#8217;s and Parkinson&#8217;s  	research.</li>
<li><strong>And Jesus Shakes His Head, Woefully:</strong> At Congressman Frank  	Pallone&#8217;s (D-NJ) town hall, a woman was attempting to describe her  	situation&#8230;from her wheelchair, she told the congressman that she had &#8220;<strong>two  	incurable auto-immune diseases.</strong>&#8220;  As the woman continued,  	anti-reform members of the crowd&#8230;started heckling her.  I&#8217;m just  	guessing that most of these hecklers would call themselves &#8220;<em>Christians</em>&#8220;&#8230;I&#8217;m  	also guessing that Jesus might have a problem with that.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QkrW22u7SwU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QkrW22u7SwU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkrW22u7SwU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkrW22u7SwU</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Most Lopsided Interview This Week:</strong> On MSNBC, Representative  	Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and CNBC&#8217;s anchor Maria Bartiromo were on as guests,  	to discuss Health Care Reform.  From early in the interview, it is  	apparent that Weiner appeared more than a bit better versed on the  	subject&#8230;but the best moment occurred when Bartiromo mocks Weiner&#8217;s support  	of Medicare, snapping, &#8220;<strong>How come you don&#8217;t use it [Medicare]? You don&#8217;t  	have it. How come you don&#8217;t have it?</strong>&#8220;  Representative  	Weiner&#8230;points out that he is only 45, to which Bartiromo lamely retorts, &#8220;<strong>Yeah,  	c&#8217;mon&#8230;</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfv_KeKRsBo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfv_KeKRsBo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfv_KeKRsBo">www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfv_KeKRsBo</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Word is now coming out of the White House, via correspondence with  	Health Care Advocacy groups, that the administration may be abandoning its  	fight for the public option and several other <strong>KEY</strong> elements of the  	reform bill.  While some White House insiders seem to support the idea  	that &#8220;<em>some bill, even a bad bill, is better than no bill</em>&#8220;&#8230;too many  	people disagree.  House Speaker Pelosi 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26742.html">has chosen to  	side</a> with the caucus of Democratic Progressives who are saying that they 	<strong>WILL NOT</strong> support a bill that does not include the public option.   	Representative Weiner 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/04/anthony-weiner-obama-hasn_n_277640.html"> has made his own claims</a>, that these compromises represent a failure of  	leadership on the part of the President&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/olbermann-obama-could-fac_n_277075.html">and  	as some point out</a>, if &#8220;<strong>change we can believe in</strong>&#8221; becomes &#8220;<strong>change  	we can barely stomach</strong>,&#8221; Obama could face challenges in the next  	primaries from Democrats claiming that they would show a bit more backbone  	if given the majority in both houses of Congress.  <strong>I think the votes  	are in: </strong> if the majority of the public wants reform and the public  	option to be a part of that reform, and you control all of Congress, and all  	the Republican minority promises is dissent&#8230;then you really have no excuse  	for not going to the mat, fighting for the best reform possible.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Stand Back, Genius At Work:</strong> Robert F. McDonnell is a  	candidate for Virginia Governor, and in a recent speech, he proudly  	mentioned his Master&#8217;s thesis, which he wrote while attending an evangelical  	college in Virginia Beach.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Apparently</span>&#8230;McDonnell didn&#8217;t think  	anyone 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/29/AR2009082902434_pf.html"> would bother to look up the thesis</a> in question&#8230;<strong>but they did</strong>.   	The thesis, which outlines the steps McDonnell suggested the Republican  	Party should take to &#8220;<em>protect</em>&#8221; families&#8230;says that feminists and  	working women are &#8220;<strong>detrimental</strong>&#8221; to families, contraception for  	unmarried people is &#8220;<strong>illogical</strong>,&#8221; and that government should show  	clear preference for married people and not &#8220;<strong>cohabitators, homosexuals or  	fornicators.</strong>&#8220;  Hear that <strong>WHOOSHING</strong> sound? Enjoy your trip  	down the political whirlpool, Mr. McDonnell.</li>
<li>First Representative Lynn Jenkins (R-KS) made the mistake of referring  	to Republican&#8217;s search for a viable presidential candidate as the quest to  	find &#8220;<strong>The Great White Hope.</strong>&#8220;  Jenkins then responded to the  	resulting outcry, by stating that she had no idea that this was a racist  	sentiment referring back to the search for a white boxer who could defeat  	black boxing champion, Jack Johnson.  <strong>THEN</strong>&#8230;we find out that  	back in <strong>JULY</strong> (<em>that&#8217;s right, just a few months ago</em>), Jenkins  	supported a resolution that explicitly <strong>STATED</strong> the history of the  	phrase: &#8220;<strong>Whereas the victory by Jack Johnson over Tommy Burns prompted a  	search for a White boxer who could beat Jack Johnson, a recruitment effort  	that was dubbed the search for the &#8216;great white hope.&#8217;</strong>&#8220;  Jenkins  	new position?  She 	<a href="http://www.ottawaherald.com/story/082809jenkinsvote">says she never  	read the resolution</a>, choosing to look like an incompetent legislator,  	rather than a racist.</li>
<li>Minnesota Republican Representative Michele Bachmann is now well known  	for making odd and inflammatory statements (<em>most recently she proposed  	that health care legislation should be defeated with &#8220;fasting and prayer&#8221;</em>).   	But now, <a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200909040004">she has  	her own theory</a> why Democrats, and apparently most of her constituents,  	want her out of office: &#8220;<strong>Also with women politicians, </strong><strong>they  	want to make sure no women, no woman becomes president before a Democrat  	woman, and so they&#8217;re doing everything they can to, I think, sabotage women  	like Sarah Palin, perhaps women like myself,</strong><strong> or similarly  	situated women, to make sure that we don&#8217;t have a prominent national voice.   	But the thing is, the people in our country, they don&#8217;t care who the voice  	is, they just want someone, they want to know that someone is speaking out  	for them against what will certainly bring about the destruction of our  	great country if we continue to go down the Obama path.</strong>&#8220;   	Yeah&#8230;it&#8217;s the <strong>DEMOCRATS</strong> who have such a pronounced diversity  	problem&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GHOSTS OF OUR PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number One:</strong> President Obama has now reversed his  	initial position, and has said that the White House visitor records 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/04/white-house-visitor-logs_n_277227.html"> will be released</a> to the public, in a clear reversal of Bush policy.   	That&#8217;s great&#8230;one down, eleven to go.  Next we&#8217;d like to see an end to  	renditions, warrantless wiretaps, signing statements, excessive use of the &#8220;<em>State  	Secrets</em>&#8221; defense, and refusal of Due Process to detainees&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number Two:</strong> Former Secretary of Homeland Defense  	Tom Ridge stunned many when his book was released and clearly indicated that  	he had been suspiciously pressured to raise the Terror Alert Level.  He  	surprised everyone 	<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/ridge-dont-believe-everything-you-read----especially-on-my-book-jacket.php?ref=fpb"> even more</a> when he went on Rachel Maddow&#8217;s show, denied that the claim  	was true, said that any suspicions he had in the past he now knew were false  	(<em>but not for any particular reason&#8230;he just &#8220;knows&#8221;</em>),  he  	criticizes the government response to Katrina&#8230;then defends it, and he says  	that even though every reason the government gave us for going into Iraq has  	been proven false, it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>ok</em>&#8221; because it was really always about  	bringing democracy to the country.  Rachel&#8230;<strong>seemed to take issue&#8230;</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qIzsZ3g7dTU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qIzsZ3g7dTU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIzsZ3g7dTU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIzsZ3g7dTU</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number Three:</strong> Former Attorney General Alberto  	Gonzales&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/alberto-gonzales-flip-flo_n_276899.html">raised  	a few eyebrows</a> when he stated that he approved of Attorney General  	Holder&#8217;s investigation into interrogators who exceeded the bounds of the  	controversial DOJ memos justifying torture: &#8220;.<strong>..if people go beyond that,  	I think it is legitimate to question and examine that conduct to ensure  	people are held accountable for their actions, even if it&#8217;s action in  	prosecuting the war on terror.</strong>&#8220;  It took about a day for Alberto to  	change his mind: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t support the investigation by the department  	because this is a matter that has already been reviewed thoroughly and  	because I believe that another investigation is going to harm our  	intelligence gathering capabilities and that&#8217;s a concern that&#8217;s shared by  	career intelligence officials and so for those reasons I respectfully  	disagree with the decision.</strong>&#8220;  I don&#8217;t know how he keeps from  	getting whiplash&#8230;my neck hurts just reading this.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The <em>Today Show</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/30/today-show-hires-jenna-bu_n_272220.html"> has a new hire</a>:  Jenna Hager, formerly Jenna Bush, daughter of  	former President George Bush.  Ok&#8230;yes, she has knowledge of &#8220;<em>living  	in the White House</em>,&#8221; but that does not equal &#8220;<em>White House insider  	knowledge.</em>&#8220;  She is a fledgling school teacher&#8230;but that does not  	make her an &#8220;<em>expert on education.</em>&#8220;  Lastly, besides her apparent  	expertise in <strong>NOTHING</strong>, I&#8217;m just not certain that hiring the daughter  	of one of the most partisan presidents in recent history will result in  	anything resembling unbiased, non-partisan journalism.  <em>Just my  	prediction&#8230;</em></li>
<li><strong>How Does This Guy Stay On Television:</strong> Pat Buchanan&#8230;it&#8217;s  	not bad enough that he was part of Nixon&#8217;s cabal&#8230;or that when running for  	president he revealed a deep-seated anger towards immigrants&#8230;and later as  	a columnist and MSNBC commentator, he voiced racist and anti-Semitic  	sentiments&#8230;but now, his recent column &#8220;<em>Did Hitler Want War</em>,&#8221;  	Buchanan seems to defend the worst genocidal dictator in world history.  	<a href="http://buchanan.org/blog/did-hitler-want-war-2068">You be the judge</a>.   	When a man has an 	<a href="http://www.adl.org/special_reports/buchanan_own_words/buchanan_intro.asp"> entire page</a> dedicated to him on the Anti-Defamation League&#8217;s (ADL)  	website, maybe he should not be featured so prominently in the mainstream  	media&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY</strong></span>:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Has everybody lost their minds? </em> When I heard that the  	President was going to address the nation&#8217;s schoolchildren, I thought &#8220;<em>big  	deal.</em>&#8220;  Presidents do this.  All presidents&#8230;both parties.   	They say &#8220;<em>hey, stay in school&#8230;don&#8217;t do drugs&#8230;you could be presidents  	someday&#8230;wink.</em>&#8220;  Well, the conservative media, and the GOP,  	specifically the Florida Republican Party, have decided that the message is  	an attempt to&#8230;wait for it&#8230;<strong>INDOCTRINATE OUR CHILDREN</strong>.  They  	say kids, &#8220;<strong>will be forced to watch the president justify his plans for  	government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies, increasing  	taxes on those who create jobs, and racking up more debt than any other  	president.</strong>&#8220;  Of course&#8230;this is <strong>BEYOND</strong> ridiculous, and  	Politifact.com 	<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/sep/02/republican-party-florida/republican-party-florida-says-obama-will-indoctrin/"> has chosen</a> to give the myth the much coveted &#8220;<em>Pants On Fire</em>&#8221;  	designation.</li>
</ul>
<p>That brings this week to a much-needed close.  Have a wonderful Labor  Day weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fresh Health Care Insanity: Death Book, Prayer, and Unicorns</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/fresh-health-care-insanity-death-book-prayer-and-unicorns/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/fresh-health-care-insanity-death-book-prayer-and-unicorns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byrd Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Herger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Stark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Byrd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Enzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendell Potter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to a vacation, and other temporary diversions, I have not been able to keep everyone up to date on Health Care Reform news...and there is plenty of fresh insanity to cover.  So...I'll skip my usual narrative and get right into a summary of recent developments...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to a vacation, and other temporary diversions, I have not been able to  keep everyone up to date on Health Care Reform news&#8230;and there is plenty of  fresh insanity to cover.</p>
<p><em>So</em>&#8230;I&#8217;ll skip my usual narrative and get right into a summary of  recent developments:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>DEATH, DEATH, AND HOW ABOUT A LITTLE MORE DEATH:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Death Panels:</strong> It started out as a simple provision, to  	require insurance companies to reimburse you for having a conversation with  	you doctor about living wills, hospice, requesting treatment, and refusing  	treatment.  Republicans inaccurately labeled this provision as &#8220;<em>euthanasia</em>&#8221;  	and said it was the equivalent of &#8220;<em>the government pulling the plug on  	Grandma</em>.&#8221;  We discovered&#8230;a co-sponsor of the provision&#8230;<em>yup</em>,  	a Republican.  Then we find out&#8230;there&#8217;s an identical provision in the  	Medicare bill from recent years, and most of the Republicans&#8230;<strong>SUPPORTED  	IT</strong>.  And now it is revealed&#8230;that even some private insurers 	<a href="http://www.uhc.com/about_us/member_rights_and_responsibilities.htm"> have such a policy provision</a> (<em>look where it says </em>&#8220;<strong>Choose an  	Advance Directive to designate the kind of care you wish to receive should  	you become unable to express your wishes.</strong>&#8220;).  That&#8217;s right --  	insurance companies have &#8220;<em>death panels!</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>Have you heard about the &#8220;<em>new</em>&#8221; thing to be afraid of?  The &#8220;<strong>DEATH  	BOOK.</strong>&#8220;  	<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/steele-protect-medicare----and-medicare-doesnt-work.php"> Michael Steele</a> and other Republicans have been charging that the Obama  	administration has published a book for our soldiers and  	veterans&#8230;encouraging them to commit suicide.  Steele has said, &#8220;<strong>I  	mean, this is crazy coming from the government, and this is exactly what  	concerns people and puts them in fear of what the government control of  	health care will look like.</strong>&#8220;  There are just a few problems with  	this claim:  First&#8230;the book was actually instituted <span style="text-decoration: underline;">during the  	Bush administration</span>.  And secondly, the book, titled &#8220;<em>Your Life,  	Your Choices: Planning for Future Medical Decisions</em>&#8221; does absolutely  	nothing to prompt veterans to end their lives.  The book merely informs  	vets how to set up living wills and advance directives, should they become  	incapacitated and therefore unable to communicate their medical wishes.   	The White House has responded with a 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/fact_sheet.doc"> fact sheet</a> and a 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/timeline.doc"> timeline</a> to refute these claims&#8230;apparently still unaware that  	opponents are not interested in facts <strong>OR</strong> timelines.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE REPUBLICAN PLAN:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember when the Republicans put out their own &#8220;<em>Economic Stimulus  	Plan</em>&#8220;&#8230;the one that had no actual figures, no specific programs or  	plans?  Remember how the media, even the conservative media, pounced on  	them for releasing such an embarrassingly deficient document?  Well, as  	proof that some people never learn, the GOP 	<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125112553661853921.html">has now  	released</a> it&#8217;s own &#8220;<em>health care plan</em>&#8221; in the form of a &#8220;<strong>seniors&#8217;  	health care bill of rights.</strong>&#8220;  It opposes any cutting of costs to  	Medicare (<em>despite the fact that it is a huge, socialized, government-run  	health care program with quite a bit of waste that <strong>COULD</strong> and <strong> SHOULD</strong> be cut</em>).  It also says that the government should not &#8220;<em>ration</em>&#8221;  	seniors&#8217; care&#8230;despite the fact that no one is <strong>TRYING</strong> to ration  	seniors&#8217; care.  Lastly, it opposes government getting in between  	seniors and their doctors&#8230;which, <strong>AGAIN</strong>, nobody is proposing.  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Wow</em></span>.  A plan that protects Medicare against two threats  	that don&#8217;t exist, and prevents making the program more cost  	efficient&#8230;while at the same time the plan offers no suggestions on how to 	<strong>IMPROVE</strong> anything?  Nice work&#8230;</li>
<li>When asked, on Fox News, why the Republicans didn&#8217;t do anything to  	improve Health Care in this country over the years that they held a solid  	congressional majority, Michael Steele offered: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t have an idea&#8230;  	That&#8217;s one of the flaws of the past, that we tripped ourselves up . We had a  	perfect opportunity even when we didn&#8217;t have control of the House and Senate  	during the early days of Bush first term to at least put in place our  	imprimatur on the health care debate But that&#8217;s the past.</strong>&#8220;  Senator  	Tom Coburn (R-OK) had a similar excuse: &#8220;<strong>Now, I don&#8217;t know why the  	leadership &#8212; I came to the Senate in 2005. I can&#8217;t account for the five  	years before that. But the fact is, is they didn&#8217;t take advantage of any of  	the opportunities they had to make big changes, and they could have done  	this and they should have, but they didn&#8217;t.</strong>&#8220;  The truth is, of  	course, it&#8217;s not that Republicans somehow just &#8220;<em>forgot</em>&#8221; to do health  	reform legislation&#8230;it&#8217;s that they <strong>DON&#8217;T WANT</strong> health reform  	legislation (<em>and don&#8217;t want us to realize it</em>).  Senator Mike  	Enzi (R-WY) was 	<a href="http://www.billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming/article_db4d1146-91f9-11de-bf23-001cc4c002e0.html"> a bit more forthright on the subject</a> when he just came out and said that  	the GOP&#8217;s plan is to oppose the reforms, slow the process as much as  	possible, weaken the bill as much as possible, and they will compromise  	nothing.  Enzi&#8217;s constituents have pointed out the other cause for the  	Republicans&#8217; universal disregard for health care reform&#8230;they are  	protesting the sizeable contributions Enzi has received from insurance  	companies to make sure that these companies don&#8217;t have to compete against a  	Public Option.</li>
<li><strong>I Rest My Case:</strong> With regard to the claims I made in the  	previous item&#8230;Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), like Senate Minority Leader  	Mitch McConnell, 	<a href="http://www.chickashanews.com/local/local_story_239102559.html"> admits</a> that he has not even read the health reform bill, does not know  	what is in the bill, but will still <strong>VOTE AGAINST IT</strong>.</li>
<li>Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN), as always, has presented 	<a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/42612/bachmann-prayer-and-fasting-will-help-defeat-health-care-reform"> a most realistic and effective means</a> towards achieving the GOP goal of  	defeating health care reform:  <em>fasting and prayer</em>.   	Bachmann urged, &#8220;<strong>That’s really where this battle will be won -- on our  	knees in prayer and fasting.  Remember: faith without works is dead. So  	we’re asking you to do all of it: pray, fast, believe, trust the Lord, but  	also act.</strong>&#8220;  She also dredged up the &#8220;<em>Death Panel</em>&#8221; nonsense,  	saying, &#8220;<strong>Thank God that Sarah Palin said that&#8230;These are true.</strong>&#8221; <em> Ohhh-kayyyy</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>A MAN NAMED BAUCUS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>When it came to the Medicare Bill&#8230;Senator Max Baucus (D-MT), the Chair  	of the Senate Finance Committee, said he gave up one negotiating with  	Senator Grassley (R-IA) when it was clear that too many concessions were  	being made in exchange for too little Republican support.  At the time,  	Baucus said, &#8220;<strong>I walked away from Senator Grassley. I tend to work with  	Senator Grassley. But there comes a time when you just gotta say, &#8216;Sorry.&#8217;  	These things get watered down too much, it&#8217;s just not right, so I just broke  	with him on that and pushed through a Medicare bill that finally got 60  	votes. We had to work hard to get those 60, because Grassley didn&#8217;t agree,  	but that was the right thing to do. So when Ted Kennedy walked on the floor  	to cast the 60th vote, that&#8217;s a moment I&#8217;ll always treasure.</strong>&#8220;  	<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/08/why_is_max_baucus_sticking_by.html"> So why now</a>, on the Health Care Reform Bill, does Baucus seem willing to  	give away the entire candy store to satisfy Grassley&#8230;when Grassley is  	publicly making wildly false claims about the bill, and can promise NO  	Republican support&#8230;not even his own?</li>
<li>Maybe the fact that Democrats are considering a measure to vote Baucus  	out of his chairmanship has caused him to change his tune.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/24/baucus-declares-that-he-w_n_267307.html"> Now, Baucus says</a>&#8230;he&#8217;s in favor of the Public Option (which he had  	previously given up as a concession to Grassley), that the Public Option is  	still on the table, and&#8230;no, he DOES NOT trust the private insurance  	companies to police themselves.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE NEW DEMOCRATIC STRATEGY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Let me see if I follow this:</strong> there&#8217;s a new Democratic  	strategy afoot.  The House and Senate Bills could go through the  	reconciliation process, thereby requiring only 51 votes to pass, not the 60  	vote &#8220;<em>filibuster-proof</em>&#8221; majority in the Senate.  However, in the  	application of what is called the &#8220;<em>Byrd Rule</em>,&#8221; any portions of the  	bill that would substantially change funding would have to be separated out  	into smaller bills (<em>this would include the Medicare items in the bill and  	the Public Option</em>).  <strong>BUT</strong>&#8230;a totally distinct vote requiring  	60 votes could be held to <em>waive</em> the Byrd Rule&#8230;allowing the <strong>WHOLE</strong> Health Care Reform package to pass with only 51 votes.  And why would  	some Republicans who would not vote for the Health Care Reform Bill, vote in  	favor of waiving the Byrd Rule?  Well&#8230;they say it&#8217;s just smart  	politics, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/24/democrats-ponder-one-bill_n_267166.html"> in this article</a>.</li>
<li>Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/26/sen-byrd-wants-health-bil_n_269332.html"> has called for</a> the health care reform legislation to be named after the  	recently-deceased Senator Ted Kennedy&#8230;seeing as it had been Kennedy&#8217;s  	passion throughout his career.  	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/us/politics/27health.html?ref=todayspaper"> Some think</a> doing so&#8230;might &#8220;<em>stiffen Democrats&#8217; spines</em>&#8221; or even &#8220;<em>win  	over some Republicans.</em>&#8220;  We will see&#8230;I remain skeptical on <strong> BOTH</strong> ideas.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HOW NOT TO HANDLE A TOWN HALL MEETING:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>How <span style="text-decoration: underline;">NOT</span> To Handle A Town Hall Meeting:</strong> Representative Wally Herger, (R-CA) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/26/gop-rep-smiles-nods-as-ma_n_269964.html"> was holding a town hall</a>, when one of the attendees proudly proclaimed  	that he was a, &#8220;<strong>proud right-wing terrorist.</strong>&#8220;  Instead of  	responding appropriately and responsibly, Herger replied: &#8220;<strong>Amen, God  	bless you.  There is a great American.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3yw060QwkUE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3yw060QwkUE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yw060QwkUE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yw060QwkUE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>How To Handle A Town Hall Meeting:</strong> Senator John McCain  	(R-AZ) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/mccain-evicts-angry-woman_n_270194.html"> held his town hall</a>, and when one participant would not stop yelling and  	disrupting, the senator warned her, &#8220;<strong>You&#8217;re going to have to stop or  	you&#8217;re going to have to leave.</strong>&#8220;  When the woman failed to comply  	and security guards began escorting her from the meeting, the Senator McCain  	quipped, &#8220;<strong>Goodbye, see ya.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5BIlVGzziQk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5BIlVGzziQk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BIlVGzziQk">www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BIlVGzziQk</a></p></p>
<p>MISCELLANEOUS:</p>
<ul>
<li>Representative Pete Stark, (D-CA) seemed to hit the nail on the head  	when he referred to the newly-introduced and poorly-defined health care  	co-op suggestions as a &#8220;<em>medical unicorn.</em>&#8220;  He elaborated: &#8220;<strong>There  	aren&#8217;t many of you listening who remember the co-ops in the &#8217;30s, which was  	kind of a Roosevelt outfit, rural electric co-ops, phone co-ops.  But,  	as I say, there is no real example of either the regulation, or how you  	would establish them, or where they would get enough people to have a  	purchasing base. So you might as well talk about unicorns. You know, what is  	a medical unicorn? My kids all know what a unicorn is. But you don&#8217;t. You  	have never seen one. So I think this co-op is just a way of ducking the  	issue of having the public plan.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em><strong>Meet Wendell Potter:</strong></em> Former head of corporate  	communications for Humana and then for Cigna&#8230;now ashamed when he hears the  	lies and scare tactics that he once helped to set in motion.  The man 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/opinion/27kristof.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion"> has a lot to say</a> that is well worth hearing.</li>
<li><strong>Interesting:</strong> I have certainly made &#8220;<em>Post Office -- Health  	Care</em>&#8221; analogies before&#8230;but this writer 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/the-us-postal-service-a-w_n_270366.html"> goes the extra mile</a>.  <strong>In short:</strong> The Postal Service is  	an inexpensive, valuable, reliable, socialized program&#8230;and when anyone  	even talks about closing someone&#8217;s local post office, everyone in the  	community goes absolutely ape.  Why can&#8217;t more people see the  	comparison between what the Postal System &#8220;<strong>IS</strong>&#8221; and what the Health  	Care System &#8220;<strong>COULD BE.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p>Stay tuned tomorrow for our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition, where I  round up all the news that&#8217;s fit to print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/fresh-health-care-insanity-death-book-prayer-and-unicorns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Health Care Madness:  An Assault Rifle, Chuck Grassley, and the Best Protest Sign</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/more-health-care-madness-an-assault-rifle-chuck-grassley-and-the-best-protest-sign/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/more-health-care-madness-an-assault-rifle-chuck-grassley-and-the-best-protest-sign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives for Patients' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLA Piper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreedomWorks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Blunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[town halls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's not as much time available today for "creative exposition," so I thought I'd quickly aggregate some of the more bizarre health care developments of the last three days...and trust me, things continue to devolve into even more bizarre "conversations" and developments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not as much time available today for &#8220;<em>creative exposition</em>,&#8221; so  I thought I&#8217;d quickly aggregate some of the more bizarre health care  developments of the last three days&#8230;and <em>trust me</em>, things continue to  devolve into even more bizarre &#8220;<em>conversations</em>&#8221; and developments.</p>
<p><strong>Hope you&#8217;re sitting down:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Last week, we reported that a man attended the Obama Town Hall in New  	Hampshire with a loaded gun strapped to his thigh, and a sign referencing  	Thomas Jefferson&#8217;s quote that the &#8220;<em>Tree of Liberty</em>&#8221; must occasionally  	be refreshed with &#8220;<em>the blood of patriots and tyrants.</em>&#8220;  Chris  	Matthews would later interview the man on Hardball&#8230;<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32386303/ns/msnbc_tv-hardball_with_chris_matthews/">revealing  	this protester</a> to be an unbalanced man with no reasonable justification  	for his actions, nor a working knowledge of the Constitution.  This  	time 	<a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoenix/articles/2009/08/17/20090817obama-scene.html"> in Arizona</a>, another man had a gun strapped to his thigh&#8230;and was  	carrying an AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle.  As with the previous  	incident, this man claimed to be simply exercising his &#8220;<em>freedoms</em>&#8221;  	proving <strong>ONCE AGAIN</strong> that many Americans don&#8217;t realize that just  	because you have the &#8220;<em>right to do something</em>&#8221; does not make it the &#8220;<strong><em>right  	thing to do.</em></strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is the Republican senator who is leading  	the bipartisan effort to draft the health care reform bill&#8230;which is a  	little frightening since he has been making 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/12/grassley-endorses-death-p_n_257677.html"> public, partisan attacks</a> which contain lies about what is in the bill: &#8220;<strong>you  	have every right to fear. You shouldn&#8217;t have counseling at the end of life.  	You ought to have counseling 20 years before you&#8217;re going to die. You ought  	to plan these things out. And I don&#8217;t have any problem with things like  	living wills. But they ought to be done within the family. We should not  	have a government program that determines if you&#8217;re going to pull the plug  	on grandma.&#8221; </strong>After catching quite a bit of criticism over these  	remarks, Grassley has decided to employ a novel defense:  blame the  	negative reactions on the Democrats.  When asked in an interview why he  	was perpetuating the false notion of &#8220;death panels,&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/17/chuck-grassley-blames-the_n_261118.html"> Grassley responded</a>, &#8220;<strong>Well, listen. I see that as nothing more than a  	distortion from the far left bringing up these end-of-life concerns, which  	are not the issues we ought to be talking about. We ought to be talking  	about government takeover of the health care system.</strong>&#8220;  Yeah,  	Chuck&#8230;it&#8217;s obviously the <strong>DEMOCRATS</strong> who don&#8217;t want to have a  	substantive, reality-based discussion about health care.</li>
<li>Oh, but Chuck Grassley&#8217;s not finished yet.  As said previously,  	Grassley&#8217;s <strong>SUPPOSED</strong> to be working with Democrats to forge a  	bill&#8230;and 	<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/2009/08/sen-grassley-on-health-care-the-government-is-a-predator.php"> according to Grassley</a>, the most important thing about the bill, even  	more important than what&#8217;s actually in it:  <em>Republican support</em>.   	And he goes on to imply that even if some Republicans support the bill (<em>again,  	that&#8217;s what&#8217;s <strong>REALLY</strong> important to Chuck</em>)&#8230;he won&#8217;t vote for it,  	unless the &#8220;<strong>overwhelming</strong>&#8221; majority of them do.  Here on planet  	Earth, we fully realize that in all likelihood none of them will, which begs  	the question:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">why is their support important, again?</span></li>
<li><strong>Fun new poll:</strong> <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/republican-party/exclusive-new-poll-finds-majority-of-republicans-either-believes-or-isnt-sure-about-death-panel-claim/"> a new poll shows</a> that the majority of Republicans either believe that &#8220;<em>death  	panels</em>&#8221; are in the reform bill, or aren&#8217;t sure.  Combined with the  	&#8220;<em>birther</em>&#8221; poll which showed nearly the same percentage of Republicans  	don&#8217;t think President Obama is an American citizen, or aren&#8217;t sure, I think  	we have clearly established that Republicans will believe just about  	anything, no matter how outrageous the claim&#8230;and they will hold onto those  	believes no matter how available the hard facts are that disprove those  	beliefs.  It&#8217;s a lovely quality, folks&#8230;<strong>don&#8217;t go changin&#8217;!</strong></li>
<li>Last weekend&#8217;s <em>Meet the Press</em> panel included both <em>MSNBC&#8217;s</em> Rachel Maddow, and Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Texas).   	Armey, is now with a group called FreedomWorks, which is essentially a  	fake-grassroots, lobbying and conservative PR/Rabble-rousing firm.  On  	the show, Armey was cornered and forced to condemn the use of swastikas and  	other Nazi references by protesters&#8230;but when he said that Freedomworks  	didn&#8217;t support violence and disruption, Rachel was quick to point out that  	FreedomWorks and its associated entities, have used violence and disruption  	as a &#8220;<em>rallying cry</em>&#8221; for the mobs they have engineered.  Here&#8217;s  	the clip&#8230;watch also for when Armey falsely claims that MoveOn.org compared  	George Bush to Hitler in an ad, and Rachel 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/columns/200908110005">points out</a> that  	it <strong>NEVER HAPPENED </strong>(<em>it was a false claim initiated by none other  	than Rush Limbaugh</em>):</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lX5RqupDB9s&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lX5RqupDB9s&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX5RqupDB9s">www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX5RqupDB9s</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>WHOOPS!</strong> Speaking of Dick Armey&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26128.html#ixzz0OC1DF9LE">guess  	who just had to resign</a> from his law firm of DLA Piper, because the  	actions of FreedomWorks are drawing so much negative attention?  Yup.   	Armey released a statement saying: &#8220;<strong>It is painful and frustrating to see  	a good, decent, able and effective partnership of honorable men and women  	and their clients attacked for things in which they are not involved simply  	because of their association with me. One would expect a higher degree of  	competence and professionalism from members of the media than spurious  	attacks on innocent bystanders.</strong>&#8220;  Let me see if I&#8217;m following this:   	Dick Armey&#8217;s FreedomWorks organizes protests that are filled with shouting,  	threatening, disruptive people&#8230;these people are told by a  	FreedomWorks-sponsored organization, in writing, how to be disruptive and  	threatening&#8230;and the media, by covering this insanity and his relationship  	to it, is somehow attacking his honorable and upstanding coworkers at the  	law firm.  <em>Uh huh</em>. Well, look at it this way, Dick&#8230;now you can  	devote <strong>ALL</strong> your time to lying to the American people in order to  	generate civil unrest.  It doesn&#8217;t look as good on a resume, but you  	gotta do what you love&#8230;</li>
<li>Conservatives for Patients Rights, the group led by 	<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2000/12/15/1215disaster.html">controversial  	and disgraced</a> former HCA CEO Rick Scott, filmed a new &#8220;<em>anti-health  	care reform ad</em>&#8221; featuring several British citizens making complaints  	about their national health care system.  Only a few problems&#8230;<strong>first</strong>&#8230;<strong>NOBODY</strong> is even talking about nationalizing our health care system, so to be blunt,  	who cares if some British people have complaints.  <strong>Second</strong>&#8230;the  	Brits were told by Conservatives for Patients Rights organization that the  	ads were part of a British ad campaign to reform the British system, so they  	just wanted to give some suggestions&#8230;the truth is, all of the citizens  	they interviewed <strong>LOVE</strong> the British system.  The women <strong>WERE NOT  	TOLD</strong> that their comments 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/15/cpr-tricked-women/">were really  	going to be used</a> to defeat health care reform <span style="text-decoration: underline;">in America</span>.  	<strong>Third</strong>&#8230;conservative legislators in Great Britain&#8230;<strong>EVEN THEY</strong> love the British system, and by a sizable margin.  Here&#8217;s the ad:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aHer9bKn438&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aHer9bKn438&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHer9bKn438">www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHer9bKn438</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>House GOP leader Roy Blunt (R-MO) was busted spreading falsehoods by a  	local paper, <em>St. Louis Post-Dispatch. </em>They blasted Blunt in an  	editorial for making the following claim in an interview with the  	newspaper&#8217;s reporters: &#8220;<strong>I’m 59.  In either Canada or Great Britain,  	if I broke my hip, I couldn’t get it replaced.</strong>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-platform/published-editorials/2009/08/truth-and-not-quite-truth-in-the-health-reform-debate/"> As the Post-Dispatch pointed out</a>&#8230;this is <strong>COMPLETELY</strong> false, and  	Blunt responded by apologizing and promising to stop making that assertion.   	This is even more embarrassing because Roy Blunt&#8230;is the head of the 	<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.blunt.house.gov');" href="http://www.blunt.house.gov/Read.aspx?ID=1059"> House GOP Health Care Solutions Group</a>, so there is <strong>NO EXCUSE</strong> for  	him getting the facts wrong.</li>
<li>Hey, at least somebody is loving all this:  On increasing doubts  	that the public option will not be included in the reform  	package&#8230;Insurance companies stocks 	<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/prospects-fade-for-public-health-insurance-option-2009-08-17"> are on the rise</a>.  Our loss -- is <strong>OFFICIALLY</strong> their gain.</li>
<li><strong>Sometimes you just have to laugh about it:</strong> visit 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/17/the-funniest-signs-from-t_n_260838.html"> here</a> for some of the funnier signs seen at town hall protests.   	This one is my favorite:</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/ProtestSigns.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="Best Protest Sign" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/ProtestSigns.jpg" alt="" width="570" height="464" /></a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s all for now&#8230;<em>more tomorrow</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/more-health-care-madness-an-assault-rifle-chuck-grassley-and-the-best-protest-sign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

