<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Dick Cheney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/dick-cheney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Tries, Fails To Distract Americans From Health Care Issue</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Paul Eaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic Heritage Month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Hensarling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the successful passage of a health care reform bill becoming increasingly optimistic, and public support for a government-run plan on the rise...what is a Republican to do? Wage a counter-offensive? No. Propose their own solutions to America's problems? No. Join in, and try to look like they're supporting health care reform? No. Quietly campaign for re-election back home? No. Of course...they'll do what they did for the last eight years, when America's attention was not where THEY wanted it to be: They'll try to DISTRACT US. Only this time...it's not working...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s bill&#8217;s passage, the health care reform  debate moves on to talks of reconciling that bill with the others produced by  the House and Senate.  Reports <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/public-option-within-eigh_n_328561.html"> have come out</a> that in the House, a robust public option may require only 8  more votes to pass&#8230;and many speculate that a somewhat less robust public  option could pass both House and Senate.  As each day passes, Democrats  appear to be speaking a bit more positively about their chances for  success&#8230;and each weekly poll shows an uptick in public support for some form  of government-run health insurance, which no doubt contributes to the Democrats&#8217;  optimism.</p>
<p><em>So</em>.  <strong>What is a Republican to do?</strong></p>
<p>Launch a fruitless counter-offensive, that will be hindered by the fact that,  over time, Americans are becoming more knowledgeable about the subject of health  care?</p>
<p>Launch their own campaign to pass an important bill in some other policy area  of their choosing?</p>
<p>Join in health care talks, so at least when the bill passes they can try to  claim they were involved, and not simply obstructing?</p>
<p>Keep quiet on policy issues, meanwhile starting their campaigns for  re-election back in their home states and districts?</p>
<p><strong>No. No. No. Definitely not.</strong></p>
<p>They&#8217;ll do what they have found so effective in the past&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">they&#8217;ll try to  distract.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>AFGHANISTAN:</strong></span> After a brief hiatus, former Vice President  Dick Cheney has again emerged&#8230;to question President Obama&#8217;s &#8220;<em>war credentials</em>&#8221;  and to claim that we are &#8220;<em>less safe</em>,&#8221; despite all reports and studies to the  contrary.  In <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33426929/ns/politics-white_house/">his  latest effort</a> to both criticize and distract, Cheney accused the president  of &#8220;<strong>dithering</strong>&#8221; and of hurting the troops while helping the enemy: &#8220;<strong>Make no  mistake. Signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden  our adversaries.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps the former veep is simply unfamiliar and  uncomfortable with gathering information from generals and experts, in an  attempt to make good decisions based on a thorough understanding of the  situation, instead of making quick decisions based only on gut feelings and prayer.  <a href="http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/1442">Who better to respond</a> to Cheney&#8217;s claims than National Security Network Senior  Adviser Gen. Paul Eaton (Ret.): &#8220;<strong>The record is clear: Dick Cheney and the Bush administration were  	incompetent war fighters. They ignored Afghanistan for 7 years with a crude  	approach to counter-insurgency warfare best illustrated by: 1. Deny it.  2.   	Ignore it. 3. Bomb it. While our intelligence agencies called the region the  	greatest threat to America, the Bush White House under-resourced our  	military efforts, shifted attention to Iraq, and failed to bring to justice  	the masterminds of September 11.  The only time Cheney and his cabal of foreign policy &#8216;experts&#8217; have  	anything to say is when they feel compelled to protect this failed legacy.  	While President Obama is tasked with cleaning up the considerable mess they  	left behind, they continue to defend torture or rewrite a legacy of  	indifference on Afghanistan. Simply put, Mr. Cheney sees history throughout  	extremely myopic and partisan eyes.</strong>&#8220;  Cheney&#8217;s statements also  resulted in a rather entertaining exchange between MSNBC&#8217;s Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell  and Joe Scarborough:</p>
<div><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/33429070#33429070" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 425px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">News about the Economy</a></p>
</div>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE ECONOMY:</strong></span> When they&#8217;re not claiming that the stimulus  has failed, while simultaneously taking credit for its successes (<em>latest  example in a growing trend <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/richard-burr-stimulus-hyp_n_327640.html"> here</a>, courtesy of Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</em>), Republicans are either  criticizing Obama for failing to impose strict new regulations on banks and Wall  Street&#8230;or they are criticizing Obama&#8217;s efforts to impose strict new  regulations on banks and Wall Street.  Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/10/20/hensarling-trumps-consumers/"> has proposed an amendment</a> to the House Financial Services Committee&#8217;s new  Consumer Protection bill&#8230;that would allow federal bank regulators (<em>who many  have claimed are a bit too friendly with the Wall Street institutions</em>) to &#8220;<em>veto</em>&#8221;  any of the protections in the bill if they thought the protections might  threaten the &#8220;<strong>safety and soundness</strong>&#8221; of the financial institutions.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Translated into normal people-speak:</span> Hensarling thinks that risky  schemes, if they provide a bank/institution&#8217;s a lot of money, should be  allowed&#8230;customer protection be damned.  Hensarling said: &#8220;<strong>The  safety and soundness of the system, taxpayer protection, ought to trump the  ability to ban financial products</strong>. <strong>And let’s face it, I understand  the chairman said that this new CFPA would not have the ability to set goals,  but if you control the product mix, if you can ban products, if you can modify  their terms, of what some have estimated could be as much as 10 to 15 percent of  our economy, then yes,</strong> <strong>I conclude you can adversely impact the  safety and soundness of these institutions</strong>.&#8221;  Again&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">this  distraction is not likely to be successful:</span> the American people are  less likely to support a legislator saying we ought to protect banks&#8217; ability to  make profit at our expense&#8230;and more likely to support a president who is about  to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/business/smallbusiness/22small.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business"> bail out small businesses</a>, and to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/obama-pay-cuts-white-hous_n_328928.html"> restrict the salaries and compensation</a> of bailed-out CEO&#8217;s.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>IMMIGRATION:</strong></span> When in doubt, the GOP loves to fall back on  an old standard: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">xenophobia</span>.  It&#8217;s perhaps odd that there are some  within the Republican Party (<em>hint: her name rhymes with Lishelle Mockman</em>)  claiming that the U.S. Census is some insidious attempt for President Obama to  gather all of your precious personal data&#8230;and there are other Republicans,  like Senator David Vitter (R-LA) and Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT), who now <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/77550.html">want the Census</a> to  ask <strong>EVEN MORE</strong> questions.  Specifically&#8230;they want to add questions  regarding <span style="text-decoration: underline;">citizenship and legal residency status</span>.  Opponents claim  that this would dramatically reduce participation in the Census&#8230;and that <strong> THAT</strong> is perhaps the true goal of the amendment&#8217;s proponents.  Perhaps  the GOP thinks that because Obama has taken few steps to address immigration  issues, that the issue is ripe for creating distraction and dissent&#8230;they are  neglecting, of course, that all polls show that &#8220;<em>immigration</em>&#8221; is pretty  low on a lot of Americans&#8217; lists of &#8220;<em>political priority</em>,&#8221; and that  current studies show that the recession has resulted in fewer and fewer people  even trying to come into our country.  It&#8217;s also ironic&#8230;that the GOP  would choose <strong>Hispanic Heritage Month</strong>, when the media is flooded with  positive stories about America&#8217;s Latino community and their contributions to our  country, as the right time to try to play off of some people&#8217;s bigotry towards  Hispanics.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>RANDOM WINGNUTTERY:</strong></span> Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN)  thought it wise to insert himself into the merry little war between the White  House and FOX News.  For those who&#8217;ve not been following this story, it  began with a statement from a White House advisor, insisting that FOX News  contained no actual &#8220;<em>news</em>&#8221; and was instead serving as a media outlet for GOP  talking points.  This was, of course, an unnecessary point to make, seeing  as most people <em>already know this</em> to be true about FOX&#8230;and those who  don&#8217;t, will never accept it as true because they never watch anything <strong>EXCEPT  FOX</strong>.  The gauntlet having been thrown, the debate has resulted in a series  of back-and-forth retorts amount to little more that &#8220;<em>Yuh-huh!</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>Nuh-uh!</em>&#8220;   Anyone with any political savvy or simple good sense would know not to become  embroiled in such a fray&#8230;.enter Senator Alexander.  From the Senate  floor, Alexander cautioned the President against forming some sort of &#8220;<strong>enemies  list</strong>&#8221; containing the names of political opponents, and organizations like FOX  News.  <em>Of course</em>&#8230;there is absolutely <strong>no</strong> evidence that the President has  any such list, <strong>nor</strong> that he is intending to formulate such a list&#8230;which is why  many, <a href="http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/pitw/2009/10/lamar_comes_unhinged_on_senate.php"> such as Nashville journalist and blogger Jeff Woods</a>, did not take long to  criticize Alexander&#8217;s &#8220;<em>advice</em>&#8221; to the President.  Instead of rushing to FOX&#8217;s defense, Lamar may want to do what the rest of his party is doing&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28589.html">distancing  themselves</a> from the network, and other rabidly conservative outlets.   Here&#8217;s Lamar&#8217;s speech, <em>just for laughs</em>:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0y1FU2WGDrM&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0y1FU2WGDrM&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0y1FU2WGDrM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0y1FU2WGDrM</a></p></p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to see why these tactics will prove less effective than in times  past:  America&#8217;s attention right now is squarely on health care&#8230;<strong>and the  GOP is partly responsible for that.</strong> In stirring up the right to believe  that the health care issue is a &#8220;<em>struggle to save America from communism/fascism/tyranny</em>&#8220;&#8230;in  scaring seniors into believing that &#8220;<em>the government is trying to kill you</em>&#8220;&#8230;in  telling recession-weary Americans that regulating/reforming insurance companies  will spell &#8220;<em>financial doom</em>&#8221; for small businesses and families&#8230;the Republican  Party has convinced the American people of something that Democrats <span style="text-decoration: underline;">also</span> wished  for our citizens to realize:  our nation&#8217;s health care system&#8217;s problems  are <strong>INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT</strong>.  By not listening to the American people, and not  realizing that the overwhelming majority of people think health care reform is  absolutely necessary and needs to happen <strong>RIGHT NOW</strong>, Republicans don&#8217;t seem to  realize that we are locked into this one, particular battle until it is  concluded&#8230;<em>and little else will draw our attention away</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Grayson&#8217;s Charge, Sex Clinics, and the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Behar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shepard Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the weekly "Chaos Theory" edition of the RLF blog...where I quickly attempt to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition of the RLF blog&#8230;where I quickly attempt  to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the  week.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Most people hadn&#8217;t heard of Representative Alan Grayson (R-FL)  	before&#8230;but they have <span style="text-decoration: underline;">now</span>.  In a wonderful, congressional, &#8220;<em>oh,  	no you didn&#8217;t</em>&#8221; moment&#8230;Grayson laid out in simple terms the terrible  	truth about the Republicans on Health Care Reform:  tens of thousands  	of Americans are dying because they don&#8217;t have insurance&#8230;and the  	Republicans have offered <strong>NOTHING</strong> but opposition to changing  	this&#8230;therefore, they must just want people to just &#8220;<em>not get sick</em>&#8221;  	and if they do&#8230;they should &#8220;<em>die quickly:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco">www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course, the Republican backlash to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/alan-grayson-republicans_n_303996.html"> Grayson&#8217;s statements</a> was fast and furious, and they demanded an  	immediate apology, comparing what Grayson did to the actions of Senator Joe  	&#8220;<em>You Lie!</em>&#8221; Wilson&#8230;despite the fact that the two events have nothing  	in common, especially in terms of congressional procedures and policies  	regarding decorum.  Grayson&#8230;complied, <em>but not in the way the GOP  	expected</em>:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/grayson-not-backing-down_n_305196.html"> he apologized</a>, not to the GOP, but to the dead and the dying and to  	their families&#8230;he apologized for Congress allowing this to happen.   	So far, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/pelosi-grayson-shouldnt-a_n_306338.html"> Pelosi has backed Grayson</a>, along with the rest of the Democrats&#8230;and  	now some 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/dems-taunt-gop-wheres-you_n_307560.html"> Democrats seem to be realizing</a>: &#8220;<em>Wait a minute&#8230;the GOP really <strong> HAVEN&#8217;T</strong> offered a plan&#8230;we should point that out!</em>&#8220;  No kidding  	guys&#8230;that one was a gimme.</li>
<li>Want the very definition of &#8220;<em>out of touch?</em>&#8220;  House Minority  	Leader John Boehner (R-OH)&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1009/Boehner_searching_for_first_public_option_backer.html?showall">says  	nobody has ever approached him</a> supporting the public option and he  	therefore doesn&#8217;t think most people support it.  Ummm, John&#8230;the  	majority of people in <strong>YOUR STATE</strong> support it&#8230;the <strong>VAST</strong> majority of the 	<a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693"> people in the country</a> support it and 	<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-HealthcareReform/idUSTRE58T0MY20090930"> would be willing to pay higher taxes to pay for it</a>&#8230;and unless you,  	Snowe, and some of the Democratic Senators who voted against it in the  	Senate Finance Committee realize that the majority of your constituents want  	it&#8230;well, there will be obvious political consequences come reelection  	time.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator David Vitter (R-LA) 	<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/60699-prostitution-complaint-filed-against-vitter"> has some new problems</a>&#8230;stemming from his old problems.  It&#8217;s been  	very odd to watch a Senator, busted for soliciting prostitutes, question the  	morality of Democrats and claim that he and other southern Republicans are  	the ones representing &#8220;<strong>true values.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps he mistakenly  	believed that the scandal was behind him&#8230;well, &#8220;<em>not so</em>&#8221; says the  	Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel.  Apparently (<em>who knew?</em>),  	soliciting prostitutes just might violate the State&#8217;s laws regarding  	professional misconduct for a lawyer.  The law states that lawyers may  	be charged with misconduct and subsequently disbarred if they &#8220;<strong>commit a  	criminal act especially one that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty,  	trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.</strong>&#8220;  Ooops.</li>
<li>The Health Care bill contains a provision for health clinics to be  	established in schools, since studies show that access to health services  	can greatly increase academic performance.  This gave Representative  	Michele Bachmann (R-MN) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/bachmann-sex-clinics-will_n_306292.html"> all that she needed</a> to formulate a new &#8220;<em>anti-reform</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theory.  Bachmann tells us&#8230;that these would actually be &#8220;<strong>sex  	clinics</strong>&#8221; where kids could go to get <strong>ABORTIONS</strong> without their  	parents knowing about it: &#8220;<strong>The bill goes on to say what&#8217;s going to go on  	-- comprehensive primary health services, physicals, treatment of minor  	acute medical conditions, referrals to follow-up for specialty care &#8212; is  	that abortion? Does that mean that someone&#8217;s 13 year-old daughter could walk  	into a sex clinic, have a pregnancy test done, be taken away to the local  	Planned Parenthood abortion clinic, have their abortion, be back and go home  	on the school bus that night? Mom and dad are never the wiser.</strong>&#8220;  Of  	course&#8230;Michelle only read item (II) under section 2511 of the bill&#8230;if  	she had bothered to read item (I) RIGHT BEFORE IT she would have known that  	the bills says: &#8220;<strong>SBHC services will be provides in accordance with  	Federal, State, and local laws governing-- (I) obtaining parental or  	guardian consent; and (II) patient privacy and student records, including  	section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of  	1996 and section 444 of the General Education Provision Act;</strong>&#8220;  Your  	choice: bad reader&#8230;or just a liar?</li>
<li>Governor Sanford of South Carolina&#8230;having been asked by both his  	fellow Republicans and his constituents to resign over his actions regarding  	the abandonment of his duties to pursue an illicit affair&#8230;<a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/965644.html">now  	asks that the state ethics panel doesn&#8217;t release its findings</a>.  <em> I wonder why</em>.  Hear that sound?  It&#8217;s the sound of Sanford&#8217;s  	fingernails dragging across the State of South Carolina&#8230;clinging on like  	grim death so that he can stay in office <em>for just a little bit longer</em>.</li>
<li>The &#8220;<em>Republican</em>&#8221; brand name?  	<a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/assessing_the_gop_brand.php">Not  	doing so hot</a>&#8230;and given the types of things I&#8217;m reading and posting  	each week, this should surprise <strong>NO ONE</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA:  PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity is so consistently wrong in terms of his facts and  	historical data, that Jon Stewart was able to dedicate almost a third of one 	<em>Daily Show</em> episode&#8230;just to pointing out Hannity&#8217;s <strong>RECENT</strong> mistakes.  I submit this clip for your enjoyment and edification:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Bernard Goldberg, a media critic, usually appears on FOX shows&#8230;to <strong> DEFEND</strong> the network against the constant stream of accusations that they  	have an obvious, right-wing bias.  So&#8230;you can imagine that people  	were a bit shocked to see him appearing on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor, and  	saying&#8230;that in many ways, FOX is to be held responsible for creating this  	perception, especially when it does things like &#8220;<em>promoting</em>&#8221; Tea Party  	protests rather than simply &#8220;<em>reporting on</em>&#8221; Tea Party protests:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Once again, Shepard Smith, host of FOX&#8217;s &#8220;<em>The Fox Report</em>&#8221; has  	chosen to speak the truth rather than simply parrot the talking points.   	On a recent segment, a guest tried to levy criticisms at the current Health  	Care Reform proposals&#8230;by pointing out that Canada&#8217;s single-payer system is  	less than perfect.  Shepard is quick to point out that it seems like a  	false and deceptive comparison, since <strong>NONE</strong> of the bills in Congress  	propose a single-payer system.  When Shepard&#8217;s guest then tries to  	create a classic &#8220;<em>straw man</em>&#8220;/&#8221;<em>slippery slope</em>&#8221; argument&#8230;Shepard  	wasn&#8217;t going to allow that either.  <strong>Good for you Shep:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/sen-graham-calls-beck-a-c_n_306434.html"> at a recent discussion</a> in front of powerful Washington &#8220;<em>movers and  	shakers,</em>&#8221; came right out and said that the &#8220;<em>birther</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theorists are &#8220;<strong>crazy</strong>,&#8221; that Obama is certainly not a &#8220;<em>closet  	Muslim</em>,&#8221; and that Glenn Beck &#8220;<strong>is not aligned with any party. He is  	aligned with cynicism and there has always been a market for cynics. But we  	became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a  	great nation because we are a nation of believers.</strong>&#8220;  Wow&#8230;could  	there finally be a Republican who might realize that the votes you get from  	siding with the extremists&#8230;<strong>ARE NOT WORTH IT</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OLYMPIC FLAME&#8230;FIZZLES:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Even after President Obama flew to Denmark to make the case for the 2016  	Summer Olympics to be held in Chicago&#8230;<a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/33138973/ns/sports-olympic_sports/">the  	prize went to someone else</a>.  In a shocking turn of events, Chicago  	didn&#8217;t even make it past the first round of voting&#8230;Tokyo would fall in the  	next round&#8230;and at the end Rio de Janeiro won over Madrid the right to host  	the games.</li>
<li>In a display that can only be described as exceedingly puerile,  	conservative commentators/columnists including RedState&#8217;s Erick Erickson,  	Michelle Malkin, and Rush Limbaugh have been, quite literally, <strong> CELEBRATING</strong> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/conservatives-revel-in-ob_n_307794.html"> the fact that America will not be hosting the 2016 games</a>&#8230;simply  	because it allows them to claim that &#8220;<em>Obama failed at something.</em>&#8220;  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">That&#8217;s right:</span> Conservatives are <strong>CELEBRATING</strong>, during an  	economic crisis, that America will <strong>NOT</strong> get the projected $22 billion  	in revenues, the 315,000 new jobs, and the $11 billion in new income that  	those jobs represent.  They&#8217;re willing to cheer against the best  	interests of the country&#8230;if it means a &#8220;<em>failure</em>&#8221; for the President.   	Remember this, when listening to these same people discuss Health Care  	Reform, or anything else:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">these people would rather America suffers</span>&#8230;as  	long as it denies Obama check in the &#8220;<em>win</em>&#8221; column.</li>
<li>While the President was unable to convince the voting members of the IOC  	to permit the games to be held in America&#8230;top White House Advisor David  	Axlerod is correct at saying 	<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/02/axelrod-blames-chicago-loss-on-ioc-politics/"> there is more involved</a> than the President&#8217;s charm.  It&#8217;s a well  	established fact that the IOC is an extremely political body, and that its  	voting process often produces unexpected results.  In recent years, the  	IOC has come under increasing pressure to allow the games to be hosted in a  	country <strong>OTHER</strong> than the United States, the nations of Europe, and the  	countries comprising Asia&#8230;and preferably a South American country.   	Given this pressure, the decision to hand the honor over to Rio de Janeiro,  	Brazil&#8230;<em>starts to make more sense</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PALINWATCH -- HOW CAN WE MISS HER IF SHE WON&#8217;T GO AWAY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Politico&#8217;s recent polls suggest that ex-Governor Sarah Palin 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/palinmap/index.html">is not well regarded  	among her fellow Republicans</a>, Republican advisors 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/mccain-campaign-manager-p_n_307523.html"> consider her to be</a> &#8220;<em>electoral poison</em>,&#8221; and many of her former  	supporters either tired of her during the Levy/Bristol business, or don&#8217;t  	respect her resigning the governorship before completing her term&#8230;but 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26236.html">there is  	still a demographic</a> that absolutely <strong>LOVES</strong> her:  Evangelical  	Christians, and Republicans living in small, country towns&#8230;and of course, 	<strong>there&#8217;s some overlap between those two groups</strong>.  I don&#8217;t think I  	even need to say anything else on the subject&#8230;draw your own conclusions.</li>
<li>The New York Post reports that Palin&#8217;s new career as a &#8220;<em>highly paid  	speaker</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/sarah_lectures_tough_sell_Z6eKRnldUitBmiOfXCBjlI"> is not going so hot</a>&#8230;perhaps due to the limited number of people (<em>mentioned  	in the previous item</em>) who still think she&#8217;s &#8220;<em>bright</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>adorable</em>.&#8221;   	In fact, one industry expert told the Post: &#8220;<strong>The big lecture buyers in  	the US are paralyzed with fear about booking her, basically because they  	think she is a blithering idiot&#8230;Palin is so uninteresting to so many  	groups -- unless they are interested in moose hunting.  What does she  	have to say? She can&#8217;t even describe what she reads.</strong>&#8220;  And as with  	the previous item&#8230;I really can&#8217;t think of anything that I need to add to  	that.</li>
<li>In a surprise move&#8230;perhaps due to her inability to book speaking gigs  	at $100,000 a pop&#8230;it was announced that 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090928/ap_on_en_ot/us_books_palin"> Palin&#8217;s memoir would be released</a> November 17, which is four months ahead  	of schedule.  The announcement regarding the book&#8217;s title generated  	even more surprised looks: &#8220;<strong>Going Rogue -- An American Life.</strong>&#8220;  It  	seemed strange to some&#8230;that Palin would want to reference &#8220;<em>going rogue</em>,&#8221;  	as it was a comment that McCain campaign insiders made referring to how  	Palin&#8217;s off-book, off-message, inconsistent, and completely unprepared  	remarks were <strong>TANKING MCCAIN&#8217;S PRESIDENTIAL BID</strong>.  In other  	words&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">it wasn&#8217;t meant as a compliment</span>.  Pre-orders for the  	book 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/09/30/palin-already-a-bestselle_0_ws_304937.html"> suggest very brisk sales</a>, causing some on the left to ascribe to a  	conspiracy theory that conservative groups and churches must be buying up  	the books in large numbers to increase the sales figures.  In  	reality&#8230;people just need to realize that not everybody who buys the book  	necessarily admires Sarah Palin&#8230;many will get it just for the likely  	entertainment value, the same way millions of people each day go out on  	YouTube and watch people ride bicycles into walls, fall off skateboards, and  	slip and fall while dancing.</li>
<li>Want a good laugh?  Here&#8217;s Ann Coulter, appearing on Joy Behar&#8217;s  	new show on CNN&#8230;asserting that the effect of Sarah Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>death panel</strong>&#8221;  	tweet shows that Palin is &#8220;<strong>a powerful woman</strong>&#8221; and that people listen  	to her because she is so &#8220;<strong>coherent</strong>.&#8221; Joy&#8230;took particular exception  	to the &#8220;<em>coherent</em>&#8221; part.  Many more excepts may be viewed 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxdq9PUQtTg">here</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember Valerie Plame?  The undercover CIA agent whose identity  	was leaked to the press after her husband criticized the Bush  	administration?  Remember the Bush administration agreeing to &#8220;chat&#8221;  	with investigators, but not on the record or under oath&#8230;and how Scooter  	Libby was eventually &#8220;<em>volunteered</em>&#8221; to take the fall for leaking the  	information, despite the fact that conventional wisdom suggested it was Vice  	President Cheney&#8217;s idea?  Thursday, a federal judge, against the wishes  	of both the Bush and Obama administrations, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/cheney-fbi-interview-must_n_306329.html"> ruled that the FBI&#8217;s notes of their interview</a> with Cheney must be  	publicly released.  This could be embarrassing&#8230;on the upside, if  	Cheney&#8217;s statements are embarrassing/incriminating enough, maybe he&#8217;ll  	finally stop appearing on talk shows.  <em>Fingers crossed&#8230;</em></li>
<li>Just last week, I was criticizing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for  	not being assertive enough, in terms of getting Senate Democrats to do  	what&#8217;s right and not &#8220;<em>what&#8217;s best for insurance companies.</em>&#8220;   	Apparently, Reid <strong>HAS</strong> grown enough of a backbone to send letters to  	President Obama and Secretary of Defense Gates&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/reid-appeals-directly-to_n_305784.html">asking  	them to finally step up</a> and lend their support to the fight to repeal  	the military&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell</strong>&#8221; policy, which is causing  	highly trained interpreters, war heroes, technical experts, and other brave  	soldiers/sailors/airmen, to be discharged from the armed services&#8230;just for  	being gay.  Reid wrote, &#8220;<strong>As Congress considers future legislative  	action, we believe it would be helpful to hear your views on the policy,&#8221; he  	writes. &#8220;Your leadership in this matter is greatly appreciated and needed at  	this time</strong>,&#8221; and then goes on to include stories of highly valuable and  	distinguished soldiers being discharged under the policy.  Obama has  	voiced his opposition to both DADT and DOMA (<em>The Defense of Marriage Act</em>)&#8230;but  	so far his administration has done more to squelch challenges to the various  	anti-gay rights policies and laws, than it has done to repeal them.  At  	a minimum, they should be lending their support to Senator Kirsten  	Gillibrand (D-NY), who has been fighting the good fight in the Senate.</li>
<li>Turns out that the Secret Service&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33120229">investigation of the Facebook  	user</a> who created a poll asking if the President &#8220;<strong>should be killed</strong>,&#8221;  	has identified a juvenile as the perpetrator.  No charges will be  	filed&#8230;but many are missing the obvious topic for discussion:  while  	the poll may not have represented a viable threat to the President, doesn&#8217;t  	it say something when the tone of our national discourse has become <strong>SO</strong> irrational, <strong>SO</strong> violent, <strong>SO</strong> hateful&#8230;that a child asks such a  	terrible question?  Glenn, Michelle, Rush, Sean, Ann, Bill, and  	others&#8230;<em>won&#8217;t you please think of the children?</em></li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s all from the Reality Liberation Front for this week -- have a good  weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Of Disgrace &#8211; Will The Volatile Rhetoric STOP?</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/state-of-disgrace-will-the-volatile-rhetoric-stop/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/state-of-disgrace-will-the-volatile-rhetoric-stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census Worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enemy of Humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic Heritage Month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indoctrination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsmax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Increasingly, I am hearing grumbles from both liberal and conservative camps, regarding the DISMAL state of the American "conversation."  It appears, at least from my utterly, and admittedly, unscientific eavesdropping...people are actually, FINALLY growing weary of the heightened rhetoric, loaded with violent innuendo, and discernibly lacking in facts.  The problem is: they just aren't tired enough yet to really reject it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increasingly, I am hearing grumbles from both liberal and conservative camps&#8230;regarding the <strong>DISMAL</strong> state of the American &#8220;<em>conversation</em>.&#8221;  It appears, at least from my utterly, and admittedly, unscientific eavesdropping&#8230;people are actually, <strong>FINALLY</strong> growing weary of the heightened rhetoric, loaded with violent innuendo&#8230;and discernibly lacking in facts.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The problem is:</span> they just aren&#8217;t tired enough yet to <em>really</em> reject it.  They are still entertained by Glenn Beck&#8217;s disingenuous ranting&#8230;they are still charmed by Sarah Palin&#8217;s vacuous speeches&#8230;they are still believing what their elected officials are telling them, even when it contradicts all logic and common sense.</p>
<p>Well&#8230;if you are one of those people who is just <em>not quite disgusted enough</em> by the current state of affairs, here are some very recent news items to help you along:</p>
<p><strong>1 -- ENOUGH HYPOCRISY TO GO AROUND:</strong> Yesterday, the Senate Finance Committee <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/first-public-option-amend_n_303228.html">discussed Senator Rockefeller&#8217;s amendment</a> to add a public option to the bill.  While it was nearly a foregone conclusion that the amendment would not pass (<em>in fact, four Democrats voted against it</em>)&#8230;the discussion leading up to the vote was shameful.  Senator Grassley (R-IA) showed his usual disdain for factual information, citing studies from the conservatively biased Heritage Foundation, as well as a study by the Lewin Group&#8230;which is <strong>WHOLLY</strong> owned by a large health insurance company (<em>it is worth note that he disregards all of the credible studies, including the one done by the Congressional Budget Office</em>).  He joined the chorus of GOP lawmakers who openly admitted that their argument, that the public option would lead to a government takeover of health insurance&#8230;<strong>was a &#8220;slippery slope</strong>.&#8221;  Of course, this shows (<em>once again</em>) that these politicians don&#8217;t know that a &#8220;<em>slippery slope</em>&#8221; is a type of <strong>LOGICAL FALLACY</strong>&#8230;an indefensible argument, not supported by reason.  And they are <span style="text-decoration: underline;">openly</span> admitting this.  The second part of their argument is that &#8220;<em>government run programs are bad</em>&#8220;&#8230;.but then when confronted with their hypocrisy regarding the government-run Medicare program, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092703277.html">they don&#8217;t want any of its costs cut</a>, and they say that Medicare is <em>different</em> because Medicare is <strong>POPULAR</strong>.  Then, they have the nerve <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/despite-outrage-many-hous_n_304175.html">to boisterously object</a> to Representative Alan Grayson&#8217;s statement on  Tuesday that the GOP health care plan suggests &#8220;<strong>don&#8217;t get sick</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and if you do, &#8220;<strong>die quickly.</strong>&#8220;  This, while just last week, Representative Eric Cantor (R-VA) suggested to a constituent that her sick family member (w<em>ho had no insurance and needed surgery</em>) sell everything she own, so she will be poor enough to get on a government program&#8230;and then seek charity.  So why are the GOP making such empty and ridiculous arguments?  Why are the Democrats even <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/michael-moore-mocks-whiny_n_304033.html">too spineless</a> to conform to their own principles?  Simple&#8230;<em>they are all bought and paid for</em>:</p>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250602" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250602" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>2 -- THE &#8220;OBAMA YOUTH&#8221; FAUX CONSPIRACY:</strong> The latest fake outrage?  A group of school children are on tape singing a song about helping their country and President Obama&#8230;for African-American History Month&#8230;and the lyrics were sent home to parents ahead of time and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">nobody</span> objected.  So how does FOX News and the rest of the right-wing media respond?  Of course&#8230;they decry it as the worst kind of indoctrination, and go as far as to vehemently claim that this never happened (<em>and never would have happened</em>) under the Bush administration.  Except&#8230;<strong>it did</strong>.  There is a clip circulating of Bush with children&#8230;praising him for his handling of the Katrina disaster.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">That&#8217;s right:</span> it&#8217;s kids praising Bush&#8230;and over one of his biggest, most thorough <strong>SCREW-UPS</strong> of his presidency.  Here&#8217;s the coverage from <em>Countdown with Keith Olbermann</em> (<em>contains all the clips</em>):</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2LkE8AuIPkY&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2LkE8AuIPkY&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LkE8AuIPkY">www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LkE8AuIPkY</a></p></p>
<p><strong>3 -- DEMONIZING YOUR ENEMY 101: </strong>Representative Trent Franks (R-AZ) <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090929/ap_on_go_co/us_franks_obama">speaking to a right-wing conference</a> at the inanely titled &#8220;<em>How To Take Back America</em>&#8221; conference, told the assembled crowd: &#8220;<strong>Obama&#8217;s first act as president of any consequence, in the middle of a financial meltdown, was to send taxpayers&#8217; money overseas to pay for the killing of unborn children in other countries.  Now, I got to tell you, if a president will do that, there&#8217;s almost nothing that you should be surprised at after that. We shouldn&#8217;t be shocked that he does all these other insane things. A president that has lost his way that badly, that has no ability to see the image of God in these little fellow human beings, if he can&#8217;t do that right, then he has no place in any station of government and we need to realize that he is an enemy of humanity.</strong>&#8220;  Frank says that <strong>OBAMA</strong> does insane things?  What about a sitting congressman referring to the President and Commander in Chief of his country as &#8220;<em>an enemy of humanity?</em>&#8220;  How is <strong>THAT</strong> reasonable or sane?  At the same conference, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/61121/fear-of-fascism-gay-agenda-dominate-conservative-kickoff-for-midterm-elections">considerable time</a> was also given to the threat of the &#8220;<em>gay agenda</em>,&#8221; the &#8220;<em>fascist agenda,</em>&#8221; and the &#8220;<em>communist agenda</em>,&#8221; making it a veritable cornucopia of issues best categorized as &#8220;<em>things to scare uneducated rubes, entrenched bigots, and homophobes.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>4 -- SCAREMONGERING FOR DUMMIES:</strong> Meanwhile, the sick comedy team of Liz and Dick Cheney, would still like to tell you that Obama is making you less safe, that he is going to put terrorists in your neighborhood, and that he is going to let the terrorists kill you.  <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27705.html">Even the generals</a> are calling this &#8220;<strong>nonsense</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>scaremongering</strong>.&#8221;  Retired General David Maddox, former Army commander-in-chief for Europe, said:  &#8220;<strong>Some of the fear issues that are being raised in this are really unfortunate. It gets people excited about things they shouldn’t be excited about and impedes doing what is critical to this country. Get that damn symbol off the table.  We take a setback every time somebody, whether it’s the vice president or his daughter comes out and says the things that they say&#8230;We have to get out there again and just keep pounding.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>5 -- POLITICS MINUS ETHICS:</strong> Remember hearing about the census worker found dead in Kentucky?  Hanging from a tree, bound and gagged, with the word &#8220;<strong>FED</strong>&#8221; written on his chest?  No doubt murdered as the result of the litany of &#8220;<em>Census Conspiracy Theories</em>&#8221; being peddled by Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and others of the right-wing fringe?  Well the local authorities&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/census-workers-son-im-sur_n_303081.html">still haven&#8217;t ruled out suicide or accidental death</a>.  Now, Kentucky officials may not be the brightest on the planet&#8230;but I&#8217;m certain that even they don&#8217;t think this happened &#8220;<em>accidentally</em>,&#8221; or that the substitute teacher/cancer survivor/census worker did it to <strong>HIMSELF</strong>.  No&#8230;they are mere petty politicians&#8230;who don&#8217;t want to admit that the chickens are coming home to roost&#8230;that the violent, inflammatory hate speech emitting out of the GOP and the right-wing media has finally claimed its first, and most obvious victim.  The man&#8217;s son calls it &#8220;<strong>shameful</strong>&#8220;&#8230;but it is even worse than that.</p>
<p><strong>6 -- MORE CHICKENS COMING HOME TO ROOST:</strong> What is all the outrage and incendiary language producing?  Besides dead census workers?  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/28/kill-obama-facebook-poll-_n_302090.html">Incidents like this</a>:  Facebook, the social networking site, has had to disable the &#8220;<em>polling</em>&#8221; function because someone posted a poll asking if the president &#8220;<strong>should be killed.</strong>&#8220;  It&#8217;s a simple-to-understand social phenomenon, that has occurred at other times in history (for those willing to learn from history):  violent language, talk of killing political enemies, proclaiming the end of America, labeling opponents as the enemies of humanity, calling for armed insurrection&#8230;it invariably leads to public, violent ideation, threats, and eventually&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">actions</span>.  The Secret Service is investigating because, once again, threats against the president (<em>even if made in jest</em>) are <strong>ILLEGAL</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>7 -- YES, SADLY, MORE CHICKENS:</strong> Need other examples of where this is headed?  <em>Newsmax&#8217;s</em> columnist John Perry wrote a piece this week&#8230;<strong>OPENLY</strong> <strong>CALLING</strong> for an armed uprising against the government.  Perry wrote: &#8220;<strong>Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Newsmax</em> <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/newsmax-distances-itself-from-columnist-says-we-believe-in-constitutional-govt.php?ref=fpblg">would later pull the article</a>&#8230;and at the same time attempted to lamely justify the piece saying that the author was only &#8220;<strong>describing</strong>&#8221; the scenario&#8230;not &#8220;<strong>advocating</strong>&#8221; it.  This semantic word-play should only serve as further cause for our disgust&#8230;and I would, as I did in the previous item, remind readers that &#8220;<em>free speech</em>&#8221; is not without constraints, and inciting armed insurrection against the government is <strong>CLEARLY</strong> illegal.</p>
<p><strong>8 -- PRIORITIES, SHMIORITIES:</strong> What does Michael Steele, chairmen of the Republican National Committee, think of the rhetoric, and the threats and violence it&#8217;s spawning?  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/michael-steele-calls-thom_n_304402.html">Steele says</a> in response to calls to tone down the level of discourse: &#8220;<strong>Where do these nut jobs come from? Come on, stop this&#8230;To make those equations, examples and put that out there that way, to me is just crazy and yeah, I&#8217;m sorry, but if you&#8217;re going to approach this discussion, approach it from a rational position.  [They're] saying, because you disagree with the president on policy, that all of the sudden we&#8217;re going to make this leap into, you know, assassinations and all this other stuff. I mean, at the height of all this stuff on Bush and people complaining and protesting, and jumping up and down, you didn&#8217;t have this kind of conversation.</strong>&#8220;  See what he did there?  It&#8217;s how the conservatives are responding to <strong>ALL</strong> criticism.  When it was suggested that <strong>SOME</strong> of the people adamantly protesting the president MIGHT be harboring racist sentiments, the right-wing responded, &#8220;<em>They&#8217;re saying that <strong>ALL</strong> people who criticize the president are racists!</em>&#8220;  And now, that many are saying that the current level of unreasonable, inciting language by <strong>SOME</strong> could <strong>POSSIBLY</strong> lead to violence, the right-wing responds, &#8220;<em>They&#8217;re saying all people who criticize the president are going to cause an assassination!</em>&#8220;  It&#8217;s a childish, pat response to an argument&#8230;that they are going to lose.  It&#8217;s worth noting that the cause that Steele <strong>DOES</strong> think is worth fighting&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/steele-rips-obama-for-mak_n_302903.html">is denouncing Obama</a> for taking <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ONE DAY</strong></span> to travel to Copenhagen to try to get the Olympics to be held in Chicago.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;Steele, thinks it&#8217;s important to attack the president for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/gibbs-is-steele-rooting-f_n_303305.html">trying to bring the Olympics</a> (<em>with all the business and prestige that accompanies the event</em>) to an American city.  Not health care&#8230;not the increasingly violent tone of American political discourse&#8230;not Afghanistan&#8230;the <strong>OLYMPICS</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>9 -- JUST ASK BRISTOL:</strong> Teens know that &#8220;<em>abstinence programs</em>&#8221; are a joke.  Studies show that the government, under the Bush administration, spent <strong>MOUNTAINS</strong> of our money funding these programs&#8230;to <strong>NO EFFECT</strong>.  <a href="http://www.statesman.com/services/content/news/stories/local/2009/09/27/0927abstinence.html?cxtype=ynews_rss">Even Texas</a>&#8230;the number one recipient of &#8220;<em>abstinence program</em>&#8221; funds, is now changing their program to a more comprehensive sex education program&#8230;because under &#8220;<em>abstinence</em>&#8221; their teen birth rate stayed the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">third highest in the nation</span> and they have the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">highest percentage</span> of teen mothers giving birth more than once. So&#8230;it makes <strong>ZERO</strong> sense that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/panel-votes-to-restore-ab_n_303812.html">the Senate just approved</a> restoring the $50 million a year of federal funding to &#8220;<em>abstinence-only programs.</em>&#8220;  That is&#8230;it makes zero sense until I tell you it was the Senate Finance Committee led by Max Baucus, the same committee to produce the only health care reform bill out of five currently in Congress that has neither a public option, nor true reform&#8230;and that would net billions more in profits for the health care industry.  Suddenly, it all becomes clear how this happened&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>10 -</strong> <strong>AY, DIOS MIO! </strong>The Republican Party has failed miserably despite its attempts since the election to attract minority voters.  Its latest efforts related to Hispanic Heritage Month, <strong>won&#8217;t help very much</strong>.  It&#8217;s bad enough that the party&#8217;s leaders regularly spout anti-immigrant, xenophobic, anti-Hispanic propaganda&#8230;but <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/09/29/rncs-spanish-translation-of-hispanic-heritage-month-press-release-riddled-with-errors/">when their press release</a> (<em>in Spanish</em>) to the Hispanic community is literally <strong>FILLED</strong> with spelling, grammatical, and translation errors, well, it certainly doesn&#8217;t make them look very &#8220;<em>in touch</em>&#8221; with the Hispanic people.  I mean <span style="text-decoration: underline;">seriously</span>&#8230;if they had even had <strong>ONE</strong> Spanish-speaking person <strong>JUST LOOK AT</strong> the release&#8230;they could have avoided this.  The ad they put out&#8230;was in some ways even more insulting, since they failed to deem any prominent non-conservative Hispanics worthy of mention.  You would think they would at least have give some time to Sonia Sotomayor&#8230;<em>yeesh</em>.</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pQzTuJdJNlQ&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pQzTuJdJNlQ&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQzTuJdJNlQ">www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQzTuJdJNlQ</a></p></p>
<p>I read pieces like these and my first thought is, &#8220;<em>I wonder if they are ashamed&#8230;I wonder if they are embarrassed,</em>&#8221; and then I realize that since the behavior of our elected officials, our media, and our fellow citizens reflects on me&#8230;<strong>that I am embarrassed</strong>.  We all should be, because it is only by our permission that people such as these are given power, are given a voice.  And until we revoke the power and the pulpit from those who we do not wish to represent us&#8230;it is we who are equally at fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/state-of-disgrace-will-the-volatile-rhetoric-stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
