<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; DOMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/doma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Rights &#8211; Minor Advances From Left, Same Bigotry From Right</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/gay-rights-minor-advances-from-left-same-bigotry-from-right/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/gay-rights-minor-advances-from-left-same-bigotry-from-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hate Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Vaughn Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can't blame the people marching for gay rights in D.C. for being skeptical about Obama's promises regarding DADT, repealing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), securing hate crimes protection for gays, and providing equal work benefits for gay employees and equal rights for their partners.  But there is one thing you have to admit...the other side of the aisle, isn't even trying.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing that thousands of citizens would be marching in Washington D.C. the  next day, President Obama said  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/equality-march-gay-rights_n_316850.html">about what one would expect him to  say</a> at a Human Rights Commission dinner  the previous evening: &#8220;<strong>I will end &#8216;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8217;&#8230;We should not be  punishing patriotic Americans who have stepped forward to serve the country.  We should be celebrating their willingness to step forward and show  such courage&#8230;especially when we are fighting two wars</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course&#8230;this is what he said during the campaign&#8230;<strong>AND</strong> he could  immediately call a moratorium on enforcement of the policy&#8230;<strong>AND</strong> <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-02-27-dont-ask-dont-tell_x.htm"> hundreds of highly trained soldiers, technicians, translators, and medical  personnel</a> have already been lost this year.  Since the policy&#8217;s  inception in 1993, over 12, 500 men and women have been discharged&#8230;men and  women that took millions of dollars to train, and who will take many <a href="http://www.digitalnewsreport.com/2009/03/dont-ask-dont-tell-statistics-for-2009/1024"> millions of dollars</a> to replace.  Men and women&#8230;<em>who are American heroes  AND citizens</em>.</p>
<p>So I guess we can&#8217;t blame the people <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/equality-march-gay-rights_n_316850.html"> marching the next day </a>for being skeptical about Obama&#8217;s promises regarding  DADT, repealing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), securing hate crimes  protection for gays, and providing equal work benefits for gay employees and  equal rights for their gay partners.</p>
<p><strong>But&#8230;he has taken some steps</strong>:  Obama has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/10/13/obama-picks-mn-woman-as-1_ws_319425.html"> just nominated</a> the first openly gay person to serve as a U.S. Marshall, and  there is word that <a href="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/10/White_House_Talks_DADT_Repeal_With_Lieberman/"> talks have been initiated</a> with Senator Joe Lieberman about repealing DADT,  since Lieberman sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee.</p>
<p>And there is one thing you have to admit&#8230;the other side of the aisle, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">isn&#8217;t  even trying.</span></p>
<p>For all the Republicans&#8217; talk of being the &#8220;<em>civil rights party</em>&#8221; and the  &#8220;<em>party of Lincoln</em>,&#8221; the GOP leadership has offered little in the way of hope to  the gay community.  <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/12/schwarzenegger-signs-two-gay-rights-bills/"> One notable exception</a>: California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger just signed  two bills, one honoring Harvey Milk, and the other recognizing gay marriages  performed in other states.</p>
<p><strong>But the GOP leadership?</strong> If Representative John Boehner <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/13/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5381671.shtml">is any  indication</a>&#8230;they are still engaged in the &#8220;<em>dark ages</em>&#8221; belief that homosexuality  is a &#8220;<em>choice</em>.&#8221;  When asked why he opposed the currently proposed  legislation to add sexual orientation to the list of things protected by hate  crime laws (<em>ie. race, religion, gender</em>), Boehner said that sexual orientation is  different from the currently protected classes, which he says are &#8220;<strong>based on  immutable characteristics.</strong>&#8220;  It&#8217;s hard to tell which of  Boehner&#8217;s positions makes <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>less</strong></span> sense:  that sexual orientation  is <strong>NOT</strong> based on permanent traits from birth&#8230;or that religious choice <strong> IS</strong>.  Seeing as <span style="text-decoration: underline;">this</span> argument doesn&#8217;t make any sense, allow me to  translate Boehner&#8217;s response on behalf of the GOP to the question of &#8220;<em>why  shouldn&#8217;t gays have equal legal protection:</em>&#8220;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong> They just don&#8217;t respect  gay Americans</strong></span>.  And it is, in part, because of this  viewpoint&#8230;homophobia-fueled beatings like the one endured by Jack Price (<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/jack-price-gay-beating-da_n_320454.html">disturbing  video here</a>) continue to occur with some frequency.</p>
<p><strong>And the Prop 8 Supporters?</strong> If their lawyer, Charles Cooper, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33319490/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/">is  any indication</a>&#8230;the pro-Prop 8 groups can&#8217;t even explain why Prop 8 (<em>a  California ban on gay marriage</em>) is necessary.  In a recent hearing U.S.  District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker asked Cooper to explain just how gay marriage  poses <span style="text-decoration: underline;">any</span> threat to heterosexual marriage, as alleged in Cooper&#8217;s  lawsuit.  Cooper&#8217;s response: &#8220;<strong>My answer is, I don&#8217;t know. I don&#8217;t know.</strong>&#8220;   Seeing as <span style="text-decoration: underline;">this</span> argument doesn&#8217;t make any sense, allow me to translate  Cooper&#8217;s response on behalf of Prop 8 supporters to the question of &#8220;<em>why  shouldn&#8217;t gays be allowed to marry:</em>&#8221; <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>They just don&#8217;t respect gay  Americans.</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>And the right-wing media?</strong> If FOX News <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/jon-stewart-takes-on-fox_n_320287.html"> is any indication</a>&#8230;they&#8217;ll cover Tea Party protests, no matter how small,  but barely give airtime to a protest of 75,000 protesters in Washington, D.C.,  marching for gay rights.  In fact, the recent Tea Party protest in D.C.  which netted about the same number of participants, seemed to warrant (<em>by  FOX&#8217;s standards</em>) almost endless coverage and ads that also served to <strong> PROMOTE</strong> the event.  FOX News even had the nerve to criticize the other  networks for covering the event too little, saying that the number of attendees  alone merited great attention&#8230;but somehow the same number of gay people, and  their heterosexual supporters, just don&#8217;t seem to count.  Seeing as <span style="text-decoration: underline;">this</span> argument doesn&#8217;t make any sense, allow me to translate FOX News&#8217; response to the  question of &#8220;<em>why shouldn&#8217;t gay civil rights protests get fair and equal  treatment on the news:</em>&#8221; <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>They just don&#8217;t respect gay Americans.</strong></span></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Jon Stewart of The Daily Show on FOX News&#8217; hypocrisy:</p>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252454" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252454" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p>What all these people forget, is that there are consequences to ignoring  segments of our own citizenry.  Republicans, and FOX&#8230;will increasingly  just have to do without the votes and viewership of gay Americans.   Democrats, and Obama&#8230;need to show gay Americans the respect the others won&#8217;t,  or they will similarly be penalized.  And they <strong>ALL</strong> should realize,  that a growing number of heterosexual Americans&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">ALSO support equal rights for gay Americans, and will vote/spend/watch  accordingly.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/gay-rights-minor-advances-from-left-same-bigotry-from-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Scorecard:  Numerous Bush Policies Intact&#8230;Some Expanded</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/obama-scorecard-numerous-bush-policies-intact-some-expanded/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/obama-scorecard-numerous-bush-policies-intact-some-expanded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signing statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrantless wiretaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans have attempted to paint President Obama as the "most liberal" president ever, who is rapidly making "drastic and rapid" changes that are somehow fundamentally changing the country we live in. Upon what information are these claims based?  What has changed so PROFOUNDLY as to make these people feel that "their America" is slipping away from them?  Truthfully...is Obama even THAT liberal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, Republicans along with much of the right-wing fringe have attempted  to paint President Obama as the &#8220;<em>most liberal</em>&#8221; president ever, who is  making &#8220;<em>drastic and rapid</em>&#8221; changes that are somehow fundamentally  changing the country we live in.</p>
<p>But&#8230;upon what information are these claims based?  What has changed so <strong>PROFOUNDLY</strong> as to make these people feel that &#8220;<em>their America</em>&#8221; is  slipping away from them?  Truthfully&#8230;is Obama really even <strong>THAT</strong> liberal?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Some points for your consideration:</strong></span></p>
<p>-  Obama kept Gates as Defense Secretary and Petraeus as commander of  U.S. Central Command&#8230;it was said that this was to preserve some sort of &#8220;<em>continuity</em>,&#8221;  but the truth is, with our military so politicized under Bush, and our efforts  in Iraq so badly planned and managed, is there really <strong>ANY</strong> justification  for the holdovers?</p>
<p>-  Obama kept Geithner (<em>elevating him to Treasury Secretary</em>) and <a href="http://www.newsday.com/ap-source-obama-keeps-bernanke-at-fed-1.1392257"> kept Bernanke</a> as head of the Fed&#8230;and recently re-upped Bernanke for a  second term.  Again, while many may credit Geithner/Bernanke with helping  to &#8220;<em>avert an economic collapse</em>&#8220;&#8230;don&#8217;t we at least have to blame them a  little for, well, <strong>WHAT LED US <span style="text-decoration: underline;">TO</span> THE COLLAPSE</strong>?</p>
<p>-  Obama has stopped our torture programs.  And recently, he put <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32552121/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/"> a very special man in charge</a> of making sure our interrogators don&#8217;t torture:  <em>John Brennan</em>, the same man who, under Bush, helped <strong>DEVELOP</strong> the  torture program.</p>
<p>- Obama, while closing Gitmo&#8230;has kept the military commission available for  use.</p>
<p>- The Obama Administration backed the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/20/obama-backs-bush-on-bagra_n_168766.html"> Bush policy</a> that Bagram detainees in Afghanistan&#8230;have no constitutional  rights.</p>
<p>-  The Obama Administration opted <strong>NOT</strong> to release the photos of  the mistreatment of detainees, despite their claim that such items <strong>CLEARLY</strong> fall under the Freedom of Information Act.</p>
<p>-  Obama has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/us/politics/04bar.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"> asserted the same</a>, controversial &#8220;<em>state secrets</em>&#8221; policy employed by  Bush to protect the government against multiple lawsuits&#8230;no matter how  well-founded the charges.</p>
<p>-  Obama continued the Bush policy of refusing to release the White  House visitors list.</p>
<p>-  Obama has repeatedly resisted calls to investigate torture committed  by U.S. personnel&#8230;despite mounting evidence.  When forced to initiate  investigations&#8230;he has called for inquiries to go no higher than the  interrogators themselves (that is, ignoring the individuals who <strong>ORDERED</strong> the torture)&#8230;and only those interrogators who exceeded the fundamentally  flawed DOJ memos which gave only the semblance of legality, not actual legality,  to the interrogators&#8217; actions.</p>
<p>-  Obama has continued the use of Bush&#8217;s infamous, and unconstitutional,  &#8220;<em>signing statements</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>-  The White House is required to save all emails&#8230;millions from the  Bush years are missing.  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/21/obama-administration-tryi_n_168843.html"> The lawsuit</a> from two advocacy groups calling for those emails to be  recovered?  The Obama White House opposed it and took steps to kill it.</p>
<p>-  The Obama Health Care Plan?  Not even half as &#8220;<em>nationalized</em>&#8221;  or &#8220;<em>socialized</em>&#8221; as the Clintons&#8217;.  It still allows for a system  dominated by private insurance, even <strong>IF</strong> the public option is included.</p>
<p>-  A challenge against the anti-gay marriage &#8220;<em>Defense of Marriage  Act?</em>&#8220;  The Obama White House <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/12/obama-defends-antigay-def_n_214764.html"> asked the court to dismiss it</a>.</p>
<p>-  A case that would have put the military&#8217;s &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221;  policy in front of the Supreme Court&#8230;the administration <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124268952606832391.html?mod=blog">let  the deadline to file a Supreme Court appeal pass quietly</a>.</p>
<p>-  The rendition/kidnapping program&#8230;kept alive.</p>
<p>-&#8221;<em>Targeted killings</em>&#8221; (<em>we call them assassinations</em>) in Pakistan  and Afghanistan&#8230;expanded.</p>
<p>-  In fact, almost all but two of the eleven key components of Bush&#8217;s  anti-terror tools <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/05/19/obama/">have been  kept</a> (<em>torture, and &#8220;black sites&#8221; are gone</em>), some of them have even  been expanded.</p>
<p>-  Warrantless Wiretapping&#8230;the Obama Administration actually fought to  keep it in place.</p>
<p>-  Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/276902">another</a> look&#8230;and <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/29575/aclu-lawsuit-tests-obama-openness-policies"> another</a>&#8230;and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/08/25/obama_finds_himself_between_bu.html?hpid=topnews"> another</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>In fact, it looks like the people who most bought the &#8220;<em>campaign rhetoric</em>&#8221;  of &#8220;<strong>CHANGE</strong>&#8220;&#8230;were Republicans.  Because despite the fact that Obama  has led as nothing, if not as a centrist&#8230;who has to date <strong>NOT</strong> called for  drastic nationalization of the banks or the health care industry&#8230;who has <strong> NOT</strong> drawn a firm line in the sand towards defending civil liberties and  equality&#8230;and who has <strong>NOT</strong> reversed more than a handful of the Bush  administration&#8217;s most odious and unconstitutional policies&#8230;<strong>the Republicans  are still seeing Obama as some sort of &#8220;<em>lefty crusader</em>.&#8221; </strong> New  flash guys&#8230;you should be thanking your lucky stars:  the majority of  Americans <strong>DID</strong> want real change, are ready for &#8220;<em>lefty policies</em>,&#8221;  and are ready to see a return to the Constitution and the Rule of Law&#8230;we are  the ones who should be most disappointed and scared thus far, <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>not you</em></span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/obama-scorecard-numerous-bush-policies-intact-some-expanded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

