<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Samurai Palin, Livers for Alcoholics, and a Witch Doctor</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-samurai-palin-livers-for-alcoholics-and-a-witch-doctor/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-samurai-palin-livers-for-alcoholics-and-a-witch-doctor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. David Milhap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Blackburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Blount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Kline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Scalise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with most Fridays I've got the problem that I have TOO MANY LINKS...but I shouldn't complain, as it is much worse to have too little to talk about.  As it is, I have gathered the most interesting (by my reckoning) and will present them here, categorized as best I can manage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most Fridays I&#8217;ve got the problem that I have <strong>TOO MANY LINKS</strong>&#8230;but  I shouldn&#8217;t complain, as it is much worse to have too little to talk about.   As it is, I have gathered the most interesting (<em>by my reckoning</em>) and will  present them here, categorized as best I can manage.  The rest&#8230;will have  to go to the &#8220;<em>recycling bin of history</em>,&#8221; because if I don&#8217;t tell you  about them now&#8230;by next week they will be &#8220;<em>old news.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>So&#8230;here&#8217;s the Friday &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition, containing all the  leftover news items for the week of July 19th through the 25th:</p>
<p><strong>PALINWATCH:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>In 2008, Sarah found another interesting use of Alaska taxpayer  	money&#8230;she used it to travel to the Mat-Su Valley so she could attend two  	religious events with the Wasilla Assembly of God folks.   	Events&#8230;which included the odd use of <strong>SAMURAI SWORDS</strong>.  A  	minister quotes from scripture: &#8220;<strong>May the praise of God be in their mouths  	and a double edged sword in their hands to inflict vengeance on the nations,  	and punishment on the peoples, and to bind their kings with fetters, their  	nobles with shackles of iron, and to carry out the sentence written against  	them.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps someone should tell them that if they kept reading,  	this guy named Jesus had more of a &#8220;<em>peace-sort-of-thing</em>&#8221; going on  	instead of a &#8220;<em>stabby-sort-of-thing</em>.&#8221;  But, who can blame them, I  	mean c&#8217;mon&#8230;<strong>SAMURAI SWORDS</strong>!  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/palin-attended-church-eve_b_237740.html"> Here&#8217;s a clip</a>.</li>
<li>Ok&#8230;this is one of the funniest political items I&#8217;ve seen all year:  	<em>Vanity Fair</em> ran a piece where Sarah&#8217;s resignation speech was marked  	up by an editor, a research editor, and a style editor.  It can be seen 	<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/07/palin-speech-edit-200907?currentPage=1"> here</a>&#8230;really, take a minute and look through it.</li>
<li><strong>Woo hoo!</strong> Sarah Palin has been slapped 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/palin-implicated-in-ethic_n_242281.html"> with her 19th ethics complaint</a>.  One more punch on her card, and  	she gets a free six-inch sandwich.  The Alaska Fund Trust, was created  	and group of lawyers from around the country who are &#8220;e<em>xperts in state  	and federal law</em>.&#8221;  The fund&#8217;s purpose was to assist Palin with the  	costs of her various legal defense efforts.  These attorneys have  	pointed to similar funds (<em>like Hillary Clinton&#8217;s</em>) and asked why the  	fund that they created is any different. <strong> The Answer:</strong> those other funds are held to federal law, which they comply with.   	Sarah&#8217;s fund complies with federal law&#8230;but may not comply with ALASKA law.   	The state investigator thinks the charge has substance; predictably, Sarah  	and her attorneys 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/palin-ethics-violation-st_n_242579.html"> do not</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HEALTH CARE:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>GOP Rep. Steve Scalise from Louisiana 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/louisiana-republican-warn_n_242111.html"> would like to warn us</a> all about the organ rationing that will occur  	under the Obama plan:&#8221;<strong>When you look at the bill, you start to realize  	what they&#8217;re doing and proposing is the very government takeover where  	rationing of care would exist where a government bureaucrat can get in  	between the relationship of you and your doctor. It&#8217;s the same thing that&#8217;s  	happened in Canada, the same thing that&#8217;s happened in England, where  	unfortunately just yesterday, we saw the story of a 22-year-old, who was  	denied life-saving care, denied a transplant by this government bureaucracy  	that exists in England that rations care.</strong>&#8220;  First of all&#8230;all  	health care systems, including <strong>OUR CURRENT ONE</strong>, exercise organ  	rationing because&#8230;there are only so many organs available!  Oh, and  	the 22-year-old he mentions that didn&#8217;t get a transplant in Australia&#8230;<a href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25816364-401,00.html">it  	was a liver transplant</a>, and it was denied because he&#8217;s an <strong>ALCOHOLIC</strong> and he wouldn&#8217;t have received it in our country, either.</li>
<li>Remember how Republicans promised that they would offer their own health  	care plan?  Well, GOP Rep. Roy Blunt, chair of  the “<em>House GOP  	Health Care Solutions Group</em>&#8221; now says they won&#8217;t.  Why?  	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/leader-of-gop-health-care-solutions-group-says-gop-wont-offer-health-care-bill/"> They claim it is because</a> they don&#8217;t want to &#8220;<em>confuse the focus.</em>&#8220;   	I&#8217;m only &#8220;<em>confused</em>&#8221; as to how they get away with opposing every  	administration plan without ever proposing a reasonable alternative&#8230;</li>
<li>Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House Republican whip, called it &#8220;<em>the  	nonpartisan Lewin Group</em>.&#8221;  The House Ways and Means Committee  	Republicans called it an &#8220;<em>independent research firm.</em>&#8220;  No matter  	what you call it&#8230;this group is the primary source of the Republican&#8217;s  	statistical data when they are arguing against the health care reform plan.  	<strong>AND</strong> no matter what you call it&#8230;it is <strong>COMPLETELY</strong> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/22/AR2009072202216.html?hpid=topnews"> owned by UnitedHealth Group</a>.  That&#8217;s right:  one of the  	nation&#8217;s <strong>LARGEST</strong> health insurance providers.  Oh&#8230;but I&#8217;m  	certain the data is completely accurate and not at all &#8220;<em>massaged</em>&#8221;  	towards the company&#8217;s own interests.</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve seen an number of blogs and emails which clearly aver that the  	president said things, at times they even attribute the claim as a direct  	quote, that <strong>HE DID NOT SAY <span style="text-decoration: underline;">AT ALL</span></strong>.  So, for the record&#8230;<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/07/22/transcript_of_obama_prime-time.html">here&#8217;s  	the transcript</a>.  And no&#8230;he did not say that the government will  	make decisions for doctors&#8230;and no&#8230;he did not say that you grandmother  	won&#8217;t get her pain meds&#8230;and no&#8230;he didn&#8217;t say that it is going to be paid  	for by taxing your health benefits.  Read or listen to the speech&#8230;and  	then comment on the speech.  <em>That&#8217;s</em> the procedure.</li>
<li>The GOP 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/23/house-gop-leader-dont-exp_n_243374.html"> keeps playing</a> this cute game of &#8220;i<em>f we can delay this past  	August&#8230;we can say we defeated Obama!</em>&#8220;  What makes this needless,  	political stalling &#8220;<em>not cute</em>&#8221; is that nearly <strong>FIVE MILLION</strong> people 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/crisis-nearly-five-millio_n_242953.html"> have lost their health insurance</a> since September, 2008.  The number  	of uninsured is 36.5 million, which means that 4.8 million adults have lost  	their insurance&#8230;<strong>IN LESS THAN A YEAR.</strong></li>
<li>The Health Insurance Industry 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/21/AR2009072101677.html?hpid=topnews"> would like to share</a> their own &#8220;<em>data</em>&#8221; with us.  They <strong>TRIED</strong> to say that 77% of people are satisfied with their private insurance&#8230;but  	it turns out that those are just the people <strong>WHO NEVER USE IT</strong>.   	Here&#8217;s a shocker:  healthy people who never have to deal with their  	insurance company&#8230;they think their service is <strong>AWESOME</strong>.  Oh,  	and in terms of customer satisfaction&#8230;turns out that people are just as  	satisfied with Medicare as they are with private insurance; so much for the  	whole &#8220;<em>government can&#8217;t do anything right</em>&#8221; claim.</li>
<li>U.S. Reps. Michele Bachmann and John Kline (<em>both Republican</em>s) say 	<a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/39874/bachmann-kline-oppose-public-option-because-its-cheaper"> they oppose the formation of a public option</a> because it would be&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>cheaper</strong></span>.   	That is, it will be cheaper&#8230;than the insurance that is currently  	bankrupting businesses and families while providing little in the way of  	service.  Um, Michelle&#8230;John&#8230;<em>that&#8217;s the whole point</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>SEX SCANDALS:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>First it came out that Governor Mark Sanford had been cheating on his  	wife&#8230;and that he abandoned his state without notice so that he could meet  	with his mistress and &#8220;<em>soul mate</em>&#8221; one last time.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/17/mark-sanford-frugal-gov-f_n_237336.html"> Now we know</a>&#8230;he flew <strong>FIRST CLASS</strong> and on the taxpayers&#8217; dime.   	His office&#8217;s response?  They say that he &#8220;<strong>compares very favorably  	with previous administrations on use of the state plane, and we believe he  	would compare favorably on his use of other state travel as well</strong>.&#8221;   	In other words, he may be corrupt, but at least he doesn&#8217;t abuse taxpayer  	money <strong>AS BAD</strong> as those past governors did.  This clearly seems to  	contradict his own claims that he is very concerned with &#8220;<em>frugality</em>&#8220;&#8230;and  	why not&#8230;he already contradicted himself on how &#8220;<em>morally upright</em>&#8221; he  	is and regarding those pesky marriage vows.</li>
<li>And&#8230;more and 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25139.html">more creepy  	details</a> come out about the C-Street house, where Sanford, Ensign, and  	Pickering stayed, prayed, confessed to each other, and then ran around on  	their respective spouses.</li>
<li> On the Subject of C-Street, Rachel Maddow interviewed Jeff Sharlet,  	the author of a book he wrote about his experiences while undercover within  	the C-Street residence:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2qsEu5UKA0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2qsEu5UKA0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2qsEu5UKA0">www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2qsEu5UKA0</a></p></p>
<p><strong>SOTOMAYOR CONFIRMATION:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Quick Catch-Up:</em> The confirmation has been 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/sotomayor-vote-delayed-on_n_241976.html"> delayed for a week</a>&#8230;for no reason whatsoever, because everyone freely  	admits that she will definitely be confirmed.  Senator Graham (R-SC)  	says he 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/gop-sen-graham-to-support_n_242875.html"> will vote for her</a>&#8230;and added: &#8220;<strong>Her life story &#8230; is something that  	every American should be proud of, and if her selection to the Supreme Court  	will inspire young women, particularly Latino women, to seek a career in the  	law, then that is a good thing -- and I hope it will.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Personal  	Comment</em>:  Regarding Graham&#8217;s statement&#8230;seriously, only a  	politician can call you a &#8220;<em>motherf--ker</em>&#8221; all week and then praise you  	at the end for being an &#8220;<em>inspirational person.</em>&#8221; Senator Kyl (R-AZ), 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/kyl-to-oppose-sotomayor_n_242747.html"> will not</a>&#8230;a specific reason wasn&#8217;t given&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>More GOP racism</em>:  Dr. David McKalip, a Republican activist  	with a strong anti-health-care-reform stance, 	<a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/conservative_activist_forwards_racist_pic_showing.php"> sent an email around</a> with the words &#8220;<strong>funny stuff</strong>&#8221; and a picture  	of President Obama as a witch doctor with a bone through his nose.   	Let&#8217;s see&#8230;we have a foolish email&#8230;with a racist picture&#8230;all that&#8217;s  	missing is a ridiculous claim of &#8220;<em>communism</em>.&#8221;  Oh wait&#8230;scroll  	down to see the hammer and sickle.  That&#8217;s it -- <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>he got the  	jackassery trifecta</strong></span>.</li>
<li>Rep. Marsha Blackburn&#8217;s (R-TN) 	<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200907220004">words</a>: &#8220;<strong>Let&#8217;s  	agree that we&#8217;re going to have PAYGO enforcement. </strong><strong>That we&#8217;re  	not going to cry &#8216;emergency&#8217; every time we have a Katrina, every time we  	have a Tsunami</strong><strong>, every time we have a need for extra spending,  	that we don&#8217;t go call for a special appropriation that allows us to  	circumvent the PAYGO rules.</strong>&#8221; While we can all appreciate fiscal  	responsibility&#8230;Blackburn&#8217;s claim that events like Katrina shouldn&#8217;t be  	treated as special circumstances where what must be done gets done with a  	minimum of bureaucracy and a maximum of speed and efficiency&#8230;is a bit  	sick.</li>
<li><em>Maybe it&#8217;s a Republican thing</em>:  Watch Rep. Virginia Foxx  	(R-NC) stumble over a classic adage:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pm8a3fFM1kw&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pm8a3fFM1kw&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm8a3fFM1kw">www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm8a3fFM1kw</a></p></p>
<p>You&#8217;ll remember that someone else  in the GOP had similar difficulties:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eKgPY1adc0A&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eKgPY1adc0A&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A">www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A</a></p></p>
<p><strong>THE MEDIA: HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>FOX&#8217;s Glenn Beck has reacted to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/07/22/senate-democrats-defeat-t_ws_242907.html"> the death in the Senate</a> of a ridiculous gun law that would have  	invalidated each state&#8217;s specific gun laws, and allowed individuals from any  	state where they have a permit, to go to any other state and carry their  	weapon.  He said in defense of the bill: &#8220;<strong>I went to the movie this  	weekend with a gun. And surprise, surprise, I didn&#8217;t kill anybody!</strong>&#8220;   	Here he is&#8230;in all his lunacy:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CVUQM5XmCIg&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CVUQM5XmCIg&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVUQM5XmCIg">www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVUQM5XmCIg</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><em>It&#8217;s official</em>: Jon Stewart of the <em>Daily Show</em> <a href="http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/archive/poll_results_417.html">is  	America&#8217;s most trusted newsman</a>.  Jon would be the first to say that  	this is a strange, sad day&#8230;a day when news journalism is so vapid and, at  	times, so biased that a man who runs a <strong>COMEDY NEWS SHOW</strong> is more  	trusted than any of the rest.</li>
<li><em>Good For You, Joe</em>:  On <em>Morning Joe</em>, Joe Scarborough 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/morning-joe-mocks-fox-net_n_242697.html"> laid into FOX</a> for being the only major network to refuse to air the  	president&#8217;s news conference.  What show was so important that it just  	couldn&#8217;t be preempted?  <em>So you Think You Can Dance</em>&#8230;sigh.</li>
</ul>
<p>And that&#8217;s it for this week&#8230;tune in Monday for all new tales of whimsy,  debauchery, political espionage, and the American condition&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>&#8230;have a great weekend.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-samurai-palin-livers-for-alcoholics-and-a-witch-doctor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: GOP Infidelity Trifecta, Senator Graham&#8217;s Interest In Crack Cocaine, and &#8220;Birthers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-gop-infidelity-trifecta-senator-grahams-interest-in-crack-cocaine-and-birthers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-gop-infidelity-trifecta-senator-grahams-interest-in-crack-cocaine-and-birthers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catherine Crabhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox and Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Pickering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Ensign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Feingold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's Friday, and time for our weekly "Chaos Theory" post...where I post all of the the OTHER stories from the week, so they don't completely fall through the cracks...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s long overdue -- time for another installment of <em>Chaos Theory</em>: my  attempt to empty out my bookmarks folder by briefly addressing all of the items  of interest that I have accumulated over the week, but did not have the chance  to address in other posts.</p>
<p><em>Without further ado</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>PALINWATCH -- BECAUSE SHE JUST WON&#8217;T GO AWAY:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>In &#8220;<em>News That Should Surprise Nobody:</em>&#8220;  Sarah Palin&#8217;s  	reasons for leaving the Governor&#8217;s office early&#8230;don&#8217;t stand up to much  	scrutiny.  Aside from her perpetual grousing over &#8220;<em>media unfairness</em>,&#8221;  	the primary reason that Palin gave for resigning involved the ethics charges  	against her, the time it was taking her to address those charges, and the  	money it was costing the Alaska taxpayers.  Do you know the actual,  	additional dollar amount it was costing those taxpayers?  	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/republican-party/key-reason-palin-gave-for-quitting-appears-to-be-false/"> Zero</a>.  Alaska, like all states, has its own legal department and  	its own attorneys on permanent staff&#8230;those attorneys get paid every year  	even if there aren&#8217;t <strong>ANY</strong> ethics charges against the governor.   	True, if they weren&#8217;t having to spend so much of their time getting Sarah  	out of jams, they could focus on other things&#8230;but the budgetary bottom  	line stays the same.</li>
<li>Oh, and all that time she was having to spend defending herself&#8230;that  	was cutting into her regular duties to the extent that it was &#8220;<em>paralyzing?</em>&#8220;   	Well, it couldn&#8217;t have been <strong>THAT</strong> much time&#8230;<a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/only_three_palin_ethics_complaint_were_still_pendi.php">there  	are only three outstanding charges</a> out of the <strong>EIGHTEEN</strong> that have  	been filed against Palin while she has been governor.  According to the 	<a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/838912.html">Anchorage Daily News</a>,  	they are as follows:  &#8220;<strong>Jan. 26: Two complaints filed by McLeod  	alleged two of Palin&#8217;s top aides misused their official positions for  	Palin&#8217;s personal and political gain. The complaints said then-press  	secretary Bill McAllister and Kris Perry &#8212; director of the governor&#8217;s  	Anchorage office &#8212; worked on state time to benefit Palin&#8217;s interests during  	and after her vice presidential quest.  April 27: Contends Palin is  	misusing the governor&#8217;s office for personal gain by securing unwarranted  	benefits and receiving improper gifts through the Alaska Fund Trust. The  	fund was recently established by supporters to help Palin pay off more than  	$500,000 in legal debts stemming from other ethics complaints, including  	troopergate. Complaint filed by Eagle River resident, Kim Chatman.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em>Ooops</em>&#8230;spoke too soon.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/15/another-ethics-complaint-_0_n_233001.html"> There&#8217;s a new complaint</a>.  The new complaint alleges that Palin  	still received her salary and utilized resources from her office towards the  	purpose of campaigning for Vice-President.  Jack Coghill, an Alaska  	Republican and an author of the state&#8217;s constitution, responded to the new  	charges by voicing his assertion that the constitution required that Palin  	officially place the lieutenant governor in charge while she was out of the  	state.</li>
<li>Liberal activist group, <em>MoveOn</em>, 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/climate-change/moveon-fundraising-email-invoking-sarah-palins-lies-brings-in-100000-in-one-day/"> has found a way</a> to capitalize on Palin&#8217;s move&#8230;their fundraising drive  	focused on Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<em>lies</em>&#8221; netted them $100,000 in just 24 hours.  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">This begs the question</span>:  besides the fact that Palin does not  	have the popular support for a Presidential run&#8230;shouldn&#8217;t Republicans also  	be concerned that even <strong>ATTEMPTING</strong> to rally around her would likely  	cause massive campaign fundraising success <strong>FOR THE DEMOCRATS</strong>?</li>
<li><strong>Just for fun</strong>:  Here&#8217;s the Daily Show&#8217;s treatment of the  	Palin resignation (<em>I just love Samantha Bee</em>)&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:232276" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:232276" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Under &#8220;<em>What is with these guys?:</em>&#8221; I&#8217;ve proposed earlier that the  	real issue with Governor Mark Sanford is <strong>NOT</strong> that he had an  	affair&#8230;it&#8217;s that he abandoned his post.  The 	<a href="http://www.thestate.com/154/story/862957.html?storylink=omni_popular"> release of emails</a> during the relevant period brings this idea front and  	center; people were really trying to contact the governor&#8230;but he was  	completely <strong>AWOL</strong>.  But now&#8230;I&#8217;m starting to look at the &#8220;<em>affair</em>&#8221;  	issue.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Bear with me</strong></span>:  First there was Sanford, then  	there was the news of Senator Ensign&#8217;s affair (<em>who also, interestingly,  	has now been tied to what 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/john-ensign-linked-to-do_b_231272.html"> some are calling</a> a &#8220;do-it-yourself-exorcism&#8221; movement&#8230;<strong>okaaaay</strong></em>)&#8230;and  	now, we are hearing about the affair of Representative Chip Pickering.   	Why is this interesting, beyond the sordid details and the fact that they  	are all Republicans?  It&#8217;s because they are all affiliated with the  	same C Street building&#8230;they all lived there at one point&#8230;it is the &#8220;<em>HQ</em>&#8221;  	of 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/25/AR2009062504480.html"> a Christian group called &#8220;The Family&#8221;</a> that has described itself in the  	past as being a sort of &#8220;<em>Christian Mafia</em>&#8220;&#8230;and 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25067.html">there are  	some claims</a> that seem to indicate that some of the &#8220;<em>indiscretions</em>&#8221;  	actually occurred <strong>INSIDE</strong> the C Street building. A group named Youth  	With a Mission actually owns the C Street building&#8230;here&#8217;s their &#8220;<em>plan</em>&#8221;  	for Christian world control:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wQtB-AF41p8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wQtB-AF41p8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQtB-AF41p8">www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQtB-AF41p8</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator Russ Feingold 	<a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/8461899/feingoldholder">has written to  	Attorney General Holder</a>, asking him to investigate Bush-era CIA  	practices.  <strong>My reaction:</strong> if not now&#8230;what would it take?   	Seriously&#8230;let&#8217;s examine the claims we have so far:  torture (<em>both  	within and outside the bounds of the DOJ memos</em>), warrantless domestic  	wiretapping (<em>both within and outside the approved bounds</em>), failure to  	inform Congress (<em>read the law&#8230;it says Congress shall be informed of <strong> ALL</strong> activities, even planned activities, even minor activities</em>),  	rogue assassination squads, extraordinary rendition.  <strong>I&#8217;ll leave it  	at this:</strong> if Holder doesn&#8217;t investigate when faced with <strong>THIS LEVEL</strong> of potentially criminal, treaty-violating, unconstitutional activity&#8230;then  	he <strong>IS NO</strong> Attorney General and we <strong>HAVE NO</strong> Justice Department.</li>
<li><span>Representative Michele Bachmann believes the  	census asks too much personal information.  She has even gone so far as  	to suggest that people should refuse to take the census.  	<a href="http://www.rollcall.com/news/36404-1.html">Even her GOP colleagues</a> were quick to point out that what she was asking people to do&#8230;<strong>IS  	AGAINST THE LAW</strong>.  Even FOX&#8217;s Glenn Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/26/michele-bachmanns-census_n_221427.html"> found her stance a bit confusing</a> (<em>of course, adding to a very long  	list of things that confuse Glenn Beck</em>). Others pointed out that failure  	of Bachmann&#8217;s constituents to fill out the census would likely cause a  	redistricting&#8230;that would <strong>ELIMINATE HER SEAT IN THE HOUSE</strong>.   	Bachmann&#8230;not one to be burdened by the laws and logic of our world, 	<a href="http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/07/13/bachmann-poe-introduce-bill-to-curb-yearly-census-survey/"> is pressing ahead with her anti-census campaign</a>.</span></li>
<li>Catherine Crabill, the Republican Party&#8217;s nominee for Virginia&#8217;s 99th  	District in the House of Delegates chose a recent Tea Party event 	<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/virginiapolitics/2009/07/delegate_candidate_fight_dems.html"> to voice her suggestion</a> that the &#8220;<em>war against taxes</em>&#8221; might be  	fought with conventional weapons: &#8220;<strong>We have the chance to fight this  	battle at the ballot box before we have to resort to the bullet box.   	That&#8217;s the beauty of our Second Amendment rights&#8230;Our Second Amendment  	rights were to guard against tyranny.</strong>&#8220;  Since Crabill seems  	interested in the Constitution and the laws of our country, I would like to  	suggest that she research another concept: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">treason, and/or fomenting  	armed insurrection</span>.  You see&#8230;there are certain things that don&#8217;t  	fall under the protections of Free Speech.  You are <strong>NOT</strong> allowed  	to shout &#8220;<em>fire</em>&#8221; in a crowded movie theater&#8230;you are <strong>NOT</strong> allowed to threaten the president&#8230;and you <strong>ARE NOT ALLOWED</strong> to call  	for the violet overthrow of the government.  Ms. Crabhill&#8230;it is a  	crime for which you may be prosecuted.  <em>A serious one</em>.</li>
<li>Just yesterday, I wrote on the topic of the new Health Care bill.   	One of the points I made was that we are not looking at the final  	bill&#8230;revisions will be made.  Well, as expected, revisions <strong>ARE  	INDEED</strong> being made&#8230;revisions that the Republicans want&#8230;and also as  	expect, just like during the Stimulus bill debate, the Republicans are  	saying that they are being given <strong>NO INPUT WHATSOEVER</strong>.  <em>That&#8217;s  	funny</em>&#8230;out of 788 amendments filed, 67 came from Democrats, 721 came  	from Republicans&#8230;and of the Republican amendments, 161 have been approved.   	Right&#8230;no input at all.  <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2223023/"> Here are the details</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>THE SOTOMAYOR SENATE CIRCUS:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator Jeff Sessions had to squeeze in 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/16/sotomayor-hearings-video_n_235154.html"> just one more embarrassing comment</a> before the Confirmation Hearings for  	Sotomayor closed.  To Wade Henderson, the president and CEO of the  	Leadership Conference on Civil Rights: &#8220;<strong>Mr. Henderson, It&#8217;s good to work  	with you. Senator Leahy and I are talking during these hearings, we&#8217;re going  	to do that crack cocaine thing that you and I have talked about before.</strong>&#8220;   	Huh?</li>
<li>Not to be outdone by Sessions, Senator Lindsey Graham 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/16/sotomayor-hearings-video_n_235154.html"> managed to make several sets of ridiculous remarks</a>.  First, instead  	of adhering to the <strong>LAW</strong> when dealing with detainees in the &#8220;<em>War on  	Terror</em>,&#8221; he suggested that he&#8217;d like to suggest that some &#8220;<strong>deserve to  	stay in jail until they die</strong>&#8220;&#8230;regardless of the actual crime the  	committed, but due instead to the &#8220;<em>nature</em>&#8221; of the conflict.   	Then, he admitted that he would have lacked the courage to support school  	desegregation if he had been in office back in 1955.  <strong>AND</strong> lastly&#8230;he added that Sotomayor: &#8220;<strong>said some things that just bug the  	hell out of me.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em> thought Senator Graham&#8217;s comments  	were worth a mention:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:233155" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:233155" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>David Arquette paid a visit to Fox and Friends and 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/16/david-arquette-analyzes-l_n_235388.html"> made some comments</a> guaranteed to garner him another invitation.   	Discussing Sotomayor, he said: &#8220;<strong>I think Latina women are, I mean, it  	depends on the woman, but I think they are very, they have great judgment,  	but there are some that are just nuts. I&#8217;m just saying.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Filed under &#8220;<em>Things That Disgust Me</em>:&#8221;  I won&#8217;t say much  	about this clip, except that it features Pat Buchanan as a guest on the <em> Rachel Maddow Show</em>, discussing Sotomayor and Affirmative Action.   	If Buchanan did not expose himself as an unqualified racist during his bid  	for the presidency&#8230;he did in this interview.  When asked why 108 of  	110 Supreme Court Justices have been white, and 108 of 110 have been  	men&#8230;Buchanan asserts that all the founding fathers, most of the soldiers  	at D-Day, and most of the soldiers at Gettysburg were white men&#8230;and so  	maybe most of the people on the Supreme Court should be, too.  <em>It&#8217;s  	disgusting, unmitigated racism</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xrtqE4WyUdY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xrtqE4WyUdY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrtqE4WyUdY">www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrtqE4WyUdY</a></p></p>
<p><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>If you&#8217;ve been paying <strong>ANY</strong> attention, you&#8217;ve heard that California  	is on the edge of complete financial collapse.  Obama has rejected most  	of their cries for help&#8230;and major banks are refusing to accept their &#8220;<em>IOU&#8217;s</em>.&#8221;   	I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;m certain I&#8217;ll say it again:  Why are the  	President and other dismissing the idea of legalizing marijuana so  	cavalierly?  It&#8217;s already the number one cash crop in the state&#8230;but  	the state economy benefits little.  Imagine the possible tax  	revenues&#8230;imagine the business opportunities&#8230;imagine the money that would  	be saved in law enforcement&#8230;imagine all the money saved in the Corrections  	system (<em>no longer having to jail people for years for minor marijuana  	offenses</em>).  Apparently&#8230;<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31796985/ns/business-us_business/">I&#8217;m  	not alone in thinking this way</a>.</li>
<li>Have you heard about this guy: U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook 	<a href="http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/breaking_news/story/776335.html"> argued that he doesn&#8217;t accept Obama as president</a>&#8230;because of the whole,  	well-debunked &#8220;<em>birth certificate</em>&#8221; nonsense&#8230;so he says he shouldn&#8217;t  	have to deploy to Afghanistan.  	<a href="http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/story/777472.html">The Army  	responded</a>:  because Cook was a reservist who <strong>VOLUNTEERED</strong> to  	go back on active duty (<em>but hadn&#8217;t started active duty yet</em>)&#8230;he can  	be <strong>UNVOLUNTEERED</strong>, which is exactly what they did.  It&#8217;s a bit  	like if I went and interviewed to work for a company, and then the day  	before I started work I called them and said &#8220;<em>You know what&#8230;I really  	don&#8217;t want to work for you, and you can&#8217;t make me.</em>&#8220;  Their response  	would be the same as the Army&#8217;s: &#8220;<em>Fine&#8230;don&#8217;t show up</em>.&#8221;   	Apparently, these fringe conspiracy theorists have come to be known as &#8220;<em>birthers</em>&#8221;  	and, of course, FOX News 	<a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2009/07/14/fox_news_legitimizes_birthers.php"> is doing all it can</a> to support their fact-free-fanaticism&#8230;and some GOP  	members in Congress 	<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-movement-picks-up-steam"> would like to help them</a>, too.  They may be nuts (<em>if you don&#8217;t  	know why&#8230;<a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html">here&#8217;s  	a resource</a></em>)&#8230;but they vote Republican.</li>
</ul>
<p>With that out of the way&#8230;we&#8217;ll start fresh on Monday.  <strong>Have a  wonderful weekend</strong>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-gop-infidelity-trifecta-senator-grahams-interest-in-crack-cocaine-and-birthers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soon-To-Be-Ex-Governor Palin: Stick A Fork In Her Fellas&#8230;She&#8217;s Done</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Ed Rendell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Murkowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/modules/wordpress/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re back! After a week of vacation, and a week of playing catch-up at work, I am finally in a position to take some time to do a quick posting. The links have been stacking up&#8230;so I think I&#8217;ll just clear the slate, and choose one thing to focus on for the first day back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We&#8217;re back!</strong> After a week of vacation, and a week of playing catch-up at  work, I am finally in a position to take some time to do a quick posting.   The links have been stacking up&#8230;so I think I&#8217;ll just clear the slate, and  choose one thing to focus on for the first day back at it.</p>
<p>And that one subject&#8230;would have to be <strong>SARAH PALIN</strong>&#8230;</p>
<p>I have so much material, that I think it&#8217;s probably impossible to weave these  into any sort of cogent narrative.  So, I guess I&#8217;ll simply try to  categorize and summarize as best as I am able:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE BOMBSHELL RESIGNATION:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>On July 3rd, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin shocked <strong>EVERYBODY</strong> by  	announcing that she not only wouldn&#8217;t run for another term as governor&#8230;but  	she also <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>wouldn&#8217;t even be finishing her first term</strong></span>.  She plans to leave  	office on July 26 to pursue&#8230;<em>well</em>&#8230;keep reading.  The full video and  	written transcript of her announcement can be found 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/03/sarah-palin-resignation-s_n_225557.html"> here</a>.  The speech&#8230;was <em>classic</em> Palin.  It was badly written,  	rambling on-and-on without much in the way of an organized structure.  It  	was badly delivered&#8230;breathlessly spewed forth in a torrent of incomplete  	sentences and rambling tangents.  There was also an obvious  	disregard for atmosphere reminiscent of Sarah&#8217;s ill-fated Thanksgiving  	interview in front of a slaughtering table &#8211; She chose to deliver the  	announcement in an area populated by loudly (<em>and somewhat comically</em>)  	honking geese, and these surroundings lent a somewhat distracting and  	surreal feel to the whole event.</li>
<li>According to Sarah&#8230;she&#8217;s leaving because of the distraction presented  	by all of the  	ethics charges against her&#8230;and the cost of defending against those  	charges&#8230;and she&#8217;s not finishing her term, but she&#8217;s not quitting, because  	she&#8217;s going to keep on &#8220;<em>fighting</em>&#8220;&#8230;but she won&#8217;t say what she will be  	fighting, or how, just that she&#8217;s not really &#8220;<em>quitting</em>&#8221; because she&#8217;ll still  	be &#8220;<em>fighting</em>.&#8221;  She later responded that it has been considered  	&#8220;<strong>honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher  	calling.</strong>&#8221;  No word as to what this higher calling might be&#8230;McCain 	<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5624MB20090704">seems  	to think</a> she will serve as some sort of Republican leadership  	figure, however, most experts see her political future as bleak.  Governor Mike Huckabee 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/05/huckabee-palin-may-not-be_n_225863.html"> says those very ethics charges</a> and her decision to leave office mid-term  	nearly negate the chances of a future presidential run.  Even Karl Rove, who  	get get conservatives to vote for a dead cat, thinks her &#8220;<em>strategy</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31753561/ns/politics-more_politics/">is  	risky and that her options are few</a>.</li>
<li>And Sarah also wants us to know that she&#8217;s really not walking out on her  	responsibilities&#8230;because he &#8220;<em>lame-duck</em>&#8221; status prevents her from getting  	any real work done.  Unfortunately for Sarah, <strong>NOBODY</strong> considers halfway  	through one&#8217;s first term a &#8220;<em>lame-duck</em>&#8221; period&#8230;in fact, this is a period  	where a governor <strong>SHOULD</strong> be able to accomplish quite a bit.  The  	Alaskans who elected her are 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31756939/ns/politics-more_politics/"> more than a little disappointed</a>&#8230;since they elected her hoping she  	would perform some <span style="text-decoration: underline;">actual</span> work.   In fact, one legislator  	spoke of Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>surprising amount of disinterest in state government  	after November&#8230;This state has a lot of problems, and she showed a complete  	lack of interest in solving them.</strong>&#8221;  Alaska&#8217;s Republican Senator  	Lisa Murkowski 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/L_Murkowski_Deeply_disappointed_Palin_has_decided_to_abandon_the_state_.html?showall"> was even harsher</a> in her criticism of Palin&#8217;s move: &#8220;<strong>I am deeply  	disappointed that the Governor has decided to abandon the State and her  	constituents before her term has concluded.</strong>&#8221; Governor Ed Rendell,  	(D-Penn) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/rendell-lays-into-palin-c_n_226438.html"> took offense</a>&#8230;criticizing her characterization of lame-duck governors,  	her designation of herself as such, and her choice to leave office during a  	recession: &#8220;<strong>To resign after two-and-a-half years in office and somehow to  	say that she was going to be a lame duck and lame ducks can&#8217;t get anything  	done and governors just go on junkets during her lame-duck period is  	ridiculous.  First of all, she&#8217;s a first-term governor, not a  	term-limited, second-term governor, and if she hadn&#8217;t announced she was  	leaving, she wouldn&#8217;t have been a lame duck, she would have been in a pretty  	strong executive position, number one. Number two, this is not the time for  	governors to abandon their states&#8230;Everyone of us is facing severe  	financial challenges brought about by the international recession and this  	is not a time to leave. We pledged to our folks when we asked them to elect  	to us, we pledged that we were going to serve four years and we serve in the  	good years, but we also serve in the bad years as well. And for her to leave  	and turn the state over to a lieutenant governor with less than a month&#8217;s  	notice, in the midst of difficult financial times, I think it&#8217;s just dead  	wrong.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Oh, and  	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/Palin_hammers_media_hints_at_national_ambitions.html?showall">it&#8217;s the media&#8217;s fault</a>, too.   	According to Palin, the mainstream media has been completely unfair to her  	and her family, they would not have gone after any other candidate the way  	they have pursued her&#8230;and she would still like to be in front of the  	cameras and allowed to talk as much as possible and if all the members of  	the mainstream press wouldn&#8217;t mind coming to see her fishing at the  	shoreline, she&#8217;d like to talk to all of them.  She said this&#8230;as she  	alluded to her future political aspirations: &#8220;<strong>How sad that Washington and  	the media will never understand; it’s about country&#8230;And though it&#8217;s  	honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher calling  	and without finishing a term, of course we know by now, for some reason a  	different standard applies for the decisions I make.</strong>&#8221;  You know&#8230;I  	could quote from this wonderful article, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/the-myth-of-how-the-media_b_226136.html"> dispelling the myth</a> that the media has been somehow &#8220;<em>harder</em>&#8221; on  	Palin&#8230;or I could show 	<a href="http://wonkette.com/409665/sarah-palins-advice-for-lady-politicians-ignore-mean-old-media"> this clip</a> from August of last year where Sarah chastises Hillary Clinton  	for &#8220;<em>whining</em>&#8221; about the media, and says that it &#8220;<em>bothers her</em>&#8221;  	when female politicians proclaim themselves victims of the press.   	Instead&#8230;I&#8217;ll call it what it is: <strong>cry-baby bullshit</strong>.  No,  	Sarah, you don&#8217;t get to pop out of nowhere as a virtual unknown, and run for  	Vice President&#8230;with a radicalized, secessionist husband&#8230;and an unwed,  	pregnant daughter&#8230;and ties to extreme, evangelical religion&#8230;and a  	history of abuse of power and ethics complaints&#8230;and a history of taking  	huge amounts of public money to fund failed projects&#8230;and then proceed to  	go ill-prepared into debates and interviews where you <strong>CONTINUALLY</strong> reveal your general lack of education, lack of knowledge of government, and  	lack of reasoning skills&#8230;<strong>AND THEN COMPLAIN THAT THE MEDIA IS TREATING  	YOU DIFFERENTLY</strong>.  The media would treat any candidate in the same  	situation, with the same background, and who exercises the same poor  	judgment the <strong>SAME WAY</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES &#8211; WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND THIS?</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Unconfirmed gossip</strong>:  let&#8217;s get this out of the way&#8230;some  	have said that Sarah was trying to get ahead of the results of very damaging  	federal investigation&#8230;however the FBI says it is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">in no way</span> investigating Palin.  If there is some damning piece of gossip or some  	pending investigation&#8230;there&#8217;s no proof of it.  Others have said Palin  	wishes to continue to 	<a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/309/story/68034.html">pursue lucrative  	book deals</a>&#8230;maybe even a position on Fox News or some other  	conservative outlet as a contributor.  Again, even if this is the  	case&#8230;there&#8217;s no evidence to support it, other than the face that she has  	signed a memoir deal with HarperCollins Publishers, which is a pretty  	standard practice for politicians.</li>
<li><strong>Presidential Run</strong>:  As mentioned earlier&#8230;even Huckabee,  	Rove, and a wealth of other Republicans and GOP campaign advisors think  	Sarah&#8217;s chances of a 2012 presidential run are <strong>SLIM</strong>.  However&#8230;<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-07-07-palin-poll_N.htm">polls  	show</a> that a majority of self-identified Republican voters would still  	vote for her for president (<em>of course, with self-identified Democrats and  	Independents&#8230;not so much</em>).  I&#8217;ll just say this:  I have a  	good friend who I consider to be a very intelligent conservative.  Back  	during the last election, he defended Palin to me&#8230;saying that it is not so  	important that she is not very intelligent, because her &#8220;<em>charm</em>&#8221; is  	such a powerful tool.  This same friend&#8230;posted on Facebook recently  	that he believes Palin should step out of the spotlight, because her  	intelligence is obviously <strong>SO LOW</strong> as to not even meet the minimum  	requirements for the presidential office.  I&#8217;m glad to see he has come  	around and finally grasped what I hold to be an obvious truth.</li>
<li><strong>Maybe she&#8217;s just nuts</strong>:  no article did so much to damage  	Sarah Palin as Todd Purdom&#8217;s opus for <em>Vanity Fair</em> titled &#8220;<em>It Came  	From Wasilla.</em>&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/sarah-palin200908"> I highly recommend reading the entire piece</a>.  The article forced a 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24392.html">major  	division</a> in the GOP&#8230;between those who were willing to admit to the  	horrific strategic mistake that was choosing Sarah Palin as the VP  	candidate, and those still blinded by&#8230;well, <em>whatever</em>.  In  	short (<em>I mean <span style="text-decoration: underline;">really</span> short, given Purdom&#8217;s article is 10,000 words  	long</em>) Palin appears to be not very bright, not very experienced, not  	very savvy&#8230;and perhaps just a bit nuts: &#8220;<strong>Several told me, independently  	of one another, that they had consulted the definition of ‘narcissistic  	personality disorder’ in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental  	Disorders &#8211; ‘a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior),  	need for admiration, and lack of empathy’ &#8211; and thought it fit her  	perfectly.</strong>&#8221;  Or maybe Liz Trotta, a contributor for Fox News, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/fox-news-contributor-rips_n_226370.html"> put it best the other day</a> when she said, &#8220;<strong>the woman is inarticulate,  	undereducated&#8230;I think all the liberal stylists&#8230;really have a case. She  	just begs for adjectives like flaky and wacky&#8230;We&#8217;re talking about somebody  	who, right from the get-go, has been a flashy person who gets into a lot of  	trouble and really has no credentials for any job.</strong>&#8221;  Wow&#8230;well  	said, Liz.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE ENSUING LAUGHTER:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Seeing as Sarah&#8217;s announcement comes so close on the heels of her spat  	with David Letterman&#8230;one can hardly fault him for taking a parting  	shot&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">or twelve</span>.  Here&#8217;s his Top Ten list of messages on Palin&#8217;s  	answering machine.  <strong>Enjoy.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jcWf4__Fybs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jcWf4__Fybs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course, Keith Olbermann couldn&#8217;t resist a bit of tongue-in-cheek  	analysis of these developments&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/07/olbermann-tackles-palins_n_227471.html">here is his segment</a> titled appropriately &#8220;<em>Palin&#8217;s  	Paling Prospects.</em>&#8221;  It mostly revolves around Andrea Mitchell&#8217;s  	interview with Palin at the water&#8217;s edge (<em>Palin had just stepped out of a  	fishing boat&#8230;hip waders and all</em>)&#8230;where Palin continues to flounder (<em>no  	fishing pun intended</em>) while attempting to explain both her motives and her  	ambitions.  For me, the highlight is when Sarah refers to the federal  	government&#8217;s &#8220;<em>Department of Law,</em>&#8221; once again reminding me of how close we  	came to having this woman as Vice President&#8230;a person who has no knowledge  	of how our government or laws <span style="text-decoration: underline;">actually</span> work.  And here&#8230;is a  	brief Palin retrospective:</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mh1umqieC7w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mh1umqieC7w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that we will have no more need for my regular &#8220;<em>Palinwatch</em>&#8221; segments,  but the truth (<em>and you and I both know it</em>) is that she&#8217;s not going <strong>ANYWHERE</strong> and  we will certainly hear from her again&#8230;for better or worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

