<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; General Paul Eaton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/general-paul-eaton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Tries, Fails To Distract Americans From Health Care Issue</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Paul Eaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic Heritage Month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Hensarling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the successful passage of a health care reform bill becoming increasingly optimistic, and public support for a government-run plan on the rise...what is a Republican to do? Wage a counter-offensive? No. Propose their own solutions to America's problems? No. Join in, and try to look like they're supporting health care reform? No. Quietly campaign for re-election back home? No. Of course...they'll do what they did for the last eight years, when America's attention was not where THEY wanted it to be: They'll try to DISTRACT US. Only this time...it's not working...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s bill&#8217;s passage, the health care reform  debate moves on to talks of reconciling that bill with the others produced by  the House and Senate.  Reports <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/public-option-within-eigh_n_328561.html"> have come out</a> that in the House, a robust public option may require only 8  more votes to pass&#8230;and many speculate that a somewhat less robust public  option could pass both House and Senate.  As each day passes, Democrats  appear to be speaking a bit more positively about their chances for  success&#8230;and each weekly poll shows an uptick in public support for some form  of government-run health insurance, which no doubt contributes to the Democrats&#8217;  optimism.</p>
<p><em>So</em>.  <strong>What is a Republican to do?</strong></p>
<p>Launch a fruitless counter-offensive, that will be hindered by the fact that,  over time, Americans are becoming more knowledgeable about the subject of health  care?</p>
<p>Launch their own campaign to pass an important bill in some other policy area  of their choosing?</p>
<p>Join in health care talks, so at least when the bill passes they can try to  claim they were involved, and not simply obstructing?</p>
<p>Keep quiet on policy issues, meanwhile starting their campaigns for  re-election back in their home states and districts?</p>
<p><strong>No. No. No. Definitely not.</strong></p>
<p>They&#8217;ll do what they have found so effective in the past&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">they&#8217;ll try to  distract.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>AFGHANISTAN:</strong></span> After a brief hiatus, former Vice President  Dick Cheney has again emerged&#8230;to question President Obama&#8217;s &#8220;<em>war credentials</em>&#8221;  and to claim that we are &#8220;<em>less safe</em>,&#8221; despite all reports and studies to the  contrary.  In <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33426929/ns/politics-white_house/">his  latest effort</a> to both criticize and distract, Cheney accused the president  of &#8220;<strong>dithering</strong>&#8221; and of hurting the troops while helping the enemy: &#8220;<strong>Make no  mistake. Signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden  our adversaries.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps the former veep is simply unfamiliar and  uncomfortable with gathering information from generals and experts, in an  attempt to make good decisions based on a thorough understanding of the  situation, instead of making quick decisions based only on gut feelings and prayer.  <a href="http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/1442">Who better to respond</a> to Cheney&#8217;s claims than National Security Network Senior  Adviser Gen. Paul Eaton (Ret.): &#8220;<strong>The record is clear: Dick Cheney and the Bush administration were  	incompetent war fighters. They ignored Afghanistan for 7 years with a crude  	approach to counter-insurgency warfare best illustrated by: 1. Deny it.  2.   	Ignore it. 3. Bomb it. While our intelligence agencies called the region the  	greatest threat to America, the Bush White House under-resourced our  	military efforts, shifted attention to Iraq, and failed to bring to justice  	the masterminds of September 11.  The only time Cheney and his cabal of foreign policy &#8216;experts&#8217; have  	anything to say is when they feel compelled to protect this failed legacy.  	While President Obama is tasked with cleaning up the considerable mess they  	left behind, they continue to defend torture or rewrite a legacy of  	indifference on Afghanistan. Simply put, Mr. Cheney sees history throughout  	extremely myopic and partisan eyes.</strong>&#8220;  Cheney&#8217;s statements also  resulted in a rather entertaining exchange between MSNBC&#8217;s Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell  and Joe Scarborough:</p>
<div><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/33429070#33429070" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 425px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">News about the Economy</a></p>
</div>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE ECONOMY:</strong></span> When they&#8217;re not claiming that the stimulus  has failed, while simultaneously taking credit for its successes (<em>latest  example in a growing trend <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/richard-burr-stimulus-hyp_n_327640.html"> here</a>, courtesy of Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</em>), Republicans are either  criticizing Obama for failing to impose strict new regulations on banks and Wall  Street&#8230;or they are criticizing Obama&#8217;s efforts to impose strict new  regulations on banks and Wall Street.  Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/10/20/hensarling-trumps-consumers/"> has proposed an amendment</a> to the House Financial Services Committee&#8217;s new  Consumer Protection bill&#8230;that would allow federal bank regulators (<em>who many  have claimed are a bit too friendly with the Wall Street institutions</em>) to &#8220;<em>veto</em>&#8221;  any of the protections in the bill if they thought the protections might  threaten the &#8220;<strong>safety and soundness</strong>&#8221; of the financial institutions.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Translated into normal people-speak:</span> Hensarling thinks that risky  schemes, if they provide a bank/institution&#8217;s a lot of money, should be  allowed&#8230;customer protection be damned.  Hensarling said: &#8220;<strong>The  safety and soundness of the system, taxpayer protection, ought to trump the  ability to ban financial products</strong>. <strong>And let’s face it, I understand  the chairman said that this new CFPA would not have the ability to set goals,  but if you control the product mix, if you can ban products, if you can modify  their terms, of what some have estimated could be as much as 10 to 15 percent of  our economy, then yes,</strong> <strong>I conclude you can adversely impact the  safety and soundness of these institutions</strong>.&#8221;  Again&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">this  distraction is not likely to be successful:</span> the American people are  less likely to support a legislator saying we ought to protect banks&#8217; ability to  make profit at our expense&#8230;and more likely to support a president who is about  to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/business/smallbusiness/22small.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business"> bail out small businesses</a>, and to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/obama-pay-cuts-white-hous_n_328928.html"> restrict the salaries and compensation</a> of bailed-out CEO&#8217;s.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>IMMIGRATION:</strong></span> When in doubt, the GOP loves to fall back on  an old standard: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">xenophobia</span>.  It&#8217;s perhaps odd that there are some  within the Republican Party (<em>hint: her name rhymes with Lishelle Mockman</em>)  claiming that the U.S. Census is some insidious attempt for President Obama to  gather all of your precious personal data&#8230;and there are other Republicans,  like Senator David Vitter (R-LA) and Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT), who now <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/77550.html">want the Census</a> to  ask <strong>EVEN MORE</strong> questions.  Specifically&#8230;they want to add questions  regarding <span style="text-decoration: underline;">citizenship and legal residency status</span>.  Opponents claim  that this would dramatically reduce participation in the Census&#8230;and that <strong> THAT</strong> is perhaps the true goal of the amendment&#8217;s proponents.  Perhaps  the GOP thinks that because Obama has taken few steps to address immigration  issues, that the issue is ripe for creating distraction and dissent&#8230;they are  neglecting, of course, that all polls show that &#8220;<em>immigration</em>&#8221; is pretty  low on a lot of Americans&#8217; lists of &#8220;<em>political priority</em>,&#8221; and that  current studies show that the recession has resulted in fewer and fewer people  even trying to come into our country.  It&#8217;s also ironic&#8230;that the GOP  would choose <strong>Hispanic Heritage Month</strong>, when the media is flooded with  positive stories about America&#8217;s Latino community and their contributions to our  country, as the right time to try to play off of some people&#8217;s bigotry towards  Hispanics.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>RANDOM WINGNUTTERY:</strong></span> Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN)  thought it wise to insert himself into the merry little war between the White  House and FOX News.  For those who&#8217;ve not been following this story, it  began with a statement from a White House advisor, insisting that FOX News  contained no actual &#8220;<em>news</em>&#8221; and was instead serving as a media outlet for GOP  talking points.  This was, of course, an unnecessary point to make, seeing  as most people <em>already know this</em> to be true about FOX&#8230;and those who  don&#8217;t, will never accept it as true because they never watch anything <strong>EXCEPT  FOX</strong>.  The gauntlet having been thrown, the debate has resulted in a series  of back-and-forth retorts amount to little more that &#8220;<em>Yuh-huh!</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>Nuh-uh!</em>&#8220;   Anyone with any political savvy or simple good sense would know not to become  embroiled in such a fray&#8230;.enter Senator Alexander.  From the Senate  floor, Alexander cautioned the President against forming some sort of &#8220;<strong>enemies  list</strong>&#8221; containing the names of political opponents, and organizations like FOX  News.  <em>Of course</em>&#8230;there is absolutely <strong>no</strong> evidence that the President has  any such list, <strong>nor</strong> that he is intending to formulate such a list&#8230;which is why  many, <a href="http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/pitw/2009/10/lamar_comes_unhinged_on_senate.php"> such as Nashville journalist and blogger Jeff Woods</a>, did not take long to  criticize Alexander&#8217;s &#8220;<em>advice</em>&#8221; to the President.  Instead of rushing to FOX&#8217;s defense, Lamar may want to do what the rest of his party is doing&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28589.html">distancing  themselves</a> from the network, and other rabidly conservative outlets.   Here&#8217;s Lamar&#8217;s speech, <em>just for laughs</em>:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0y1FU2WGDrM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0y1FU2WGDrM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0y1FU2WGDrM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0y1FU2WGDrM</a></p></p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to see why these tactics will prove less effective than in times  past:  America&#8217;s attention right now is squarely on health care&#8230;<strong>and the  GOP is partly responsible for that.</strong> In stirring up the right to believe  that the health care issue is a &#8220;<em>struggle to save America from communism/fascism/tyranny</em>&#8220;&#8230;in  scaring seniors into believing that &#8220;<em>the government is trying to kill you</em>&#8220;&#8230;in  telling recession-weary Americans that regulating/reforming insurance companies  will spell &#8220;<em>financial doom</em>&#8221; for small businesses and families&#8230;the Republican  Party has convinced the American people of something that Democrats <span style="text-decoration: underline;">also</span> wished  for our citizens to realize:  our nation&#8217;s health care system&#8217;s problems  are <strong>INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT</strong>.  By not listening to the American people, and not  realizing that the overwhelming majority of people think health care reform is  absolutely necessary and needs to happen <strong>RIGHT NOW</strong>, Republicans don&#8217;t seem to  realize that we are locked into this one, particular battle until it is  concluded&#8230;<em>and little else will draw our attention away</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

