<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Governor Mike Huckabee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/governor-mike-huckabee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition:  More Death, Heckling the Disabled, and Indoctrination</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Pallone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenna Hager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Batiromo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, yours truly has been down for the count all week with the nasty head cold making the rounds in Nashville...so let's try to wrap things up with our weekly edition of Chaos Theory...here's what I've collected over the last five days.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yours truly has been down for the count all week with the nasty head  cold making the rounds in Nashville&#8230;so let&#8217;s try to wrap things up with our  weekly edition of <em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8230;here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve collected over the last five days</em>:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HEALTHCARE -- THE DEBATE THAT&#8217;S KILLING US SLOWLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Despite the thorough, public debunking of the ridiculous &#8220;<em>death panel</em>&#8221;  	claims, and the fact that even the right-wing press outlets aren&#8217;t  	mentioning the conspiracy theory anymore, some politicians <strong>may not have  	received the memo</strong>.  Representative Pete Olson (R-TX) was holding a  	recent town hall meeting, and he told the crowd about a girl named &#8220;<em>Britney</em>.&#8221;   	The girl&#8217;s unborn child was found to have a heart defect&#8230;and despite her  	best efforts she couldn&#8217;t find a doctor to treat her baby until she located  	a remote, out-of-state specialist.  Olson goes on to claim&#8230;that in  	any proposed &#8220;<em>government-run</em>&#8221; system, the baby would have died for  	lack of treatment.  The crowd, who apparently <strong>HAD</strong> received the  	memo&#8230;and who knew that these types of claims are false and intended only  	to scare them&#8230;proceeded to boo Representative Olson, and shouted, &#8220;<strong>Oh  	Jesus Christ, that&#8217;s terrible</strong>,&#8221; and, &#8220;<strong>That&#8217;s not true!</strong>&#8220;  To  	these people, Olson nonsensically responded, &#8220;<strong>For those of you who say  	it&#8217;s not true, don&#8217;t talk to me, talk to Britney</strong>.&#8221;  Wait&#8230;<em>what</em>?</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_MvNF2GUE0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1&amp;feature=player_embedded" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_MvNF2GUE0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1&amp;feature=player_embedded" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_MvNF2GUE0">www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_MvNF2GUE0</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee&#8230;not only didn&#8217;t get the &#8220;<em>mentioning-death-panels-now-makes-you-look-like-an-idiot</em>&#8221;  	memo, but he also decided that merely repeating a claim that has been proven  	false&#8230;<em>wasn&#8217;t quite tacky enough</em>.  So Huckabee 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/28/huckabee-kennedy-would-ha_n_271605.html"> went on his radio show</a> and suggested that the recently departed Senator  	Kennedy&#8230;would have been urged to &#8220;<strong>go home to take pain pills and die</strong>&#8221;  	under Obama&#8217;s reform plan.  And we&#8217;ll add some more &#8220;<em>tackiness  	points</em>&#8221; since Huckabee, just last week, chided Democrats for what he  	perceived as them using Ted Kennedy&#8217;s death to advance the cause of reform.  	<strong>Oh Mike: </strong> it&#8217;s just as sick to use his name <strong>AGAINST</strong> reform&#8230;especially when you consider health care reform was his <strong>LIFELONG</strong> goal.</li>
<li>Generally, I don&#8217;t pass on &#8220;<em>moving stories that explain the need for  	Health Care Reform.</em>&#8220;  Except, in this case, the story is a lot more  	&#8220;<em>illuminating</em>&#8221; than it is &#8220;<em>moving</em>,&#8221; and it represents yet  	another deficiency of our current system that most people are not aware of.   	You probably <span style="text-decoration: underline;">did</span> know, that nearly 68% of all bankruptcies in America  	result from medical costs.  What you may not know&#8230;is that many  	divorces are also caused by a mixture of financial and medical necessity.   	Case in point, 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/opinion/30kristof.html?_r=1">read  	this story</a>&#8230;<strong>it&#8217;s actually quite common:</strong> husband develops  	debilitating disease, doctors shock wife by suggesting she immediately get a  	divorce or she will lose everything, wife consults lawyers who confirm what  	the doctors are saying, wife has a terrible choice to make&#8230;leave her  	husband or lose all their savings, retirement, and property.</li>
<li><strong>Interesting:</strong> I&#8217;m first to admit that I am no expert on  	taxes.  But it is interesting to note, 	<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/214267?from=rss">as this columnist does</a>,  	that while Republicans have been heavily utilizing the &#8220;<em>health care  	reform will urge grandma to die sooner</em>&#8221; attack&#8230;many past tax bills (<em>sponsored  	by Republicans, and notably one Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA)</em>) have done  	just that:  <strong>urged grandma to die sooner</strong>.  In addition to  	initiating tax changes that penalize seniors for living longer, Republicans  	have supported companies that swindled seniors out of their retirement money  	(<em>they dismiss it as &#8220;that&#8217;s the way the free market cookie crumbles!&#8221;</em>),  	and they refuse to let more money go into Alzheimer&#8217;s and Parkinson&#8217;s  	research.</li>
<li><strong>And Jesus Shakes His Head, Woefully:</strong> At Congressman Frank  	Pallone&#8217;s (D-NJ) town hall, a woman was attempting to describe her  	situation&#8230;from her wheelchair, she told the congressman that she had &#8220;<strong>two  	incurable auto-immune diseases.</strong>&#8220;  As the woman continued,  	anti-reform members of the crowd&#8230;started heckling her.  I&#8217;m just  	guessing that most of these hecklers would call themselves &#8220;<em>Christians</em>&#8220;&#8230;I&#8217;m  	also guessing that Jesus might have a problem with that.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QkrW22u7SwU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QkrW22u7SwU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkrW22u7SwU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkrW22u7SwU</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Most Lopsided Interview This Week:</strong> On MSNBC, Representative  	Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and CNBC&#8217;s anchor Maria Bartiromo were on as guests,  	to discuss Health Care Reform.  From early in the interview, it is  	apparent that Weiner appeared more than a bit better versed on the  	subject&#8230;but the best moment occurred when Bartiromo mocks Weiner&#8217;s support  	of Medicare, snapping, &#8220;<strong>How come you don&#8217;t use it [Medicare]? You don&#8217;t  	have it. How come you don&#8217;t have it?</strong>&#8220;  Representative  	Weiner&#8230;points out that he is only 45, to which Bartiromo lamely retorts, &#8220;<strong>Yeah,  	c&#8217;mon&#8230;</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfv_KeKRsBo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfv_KeKRsBo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfv_KeKRsBo">www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfv_KeKRsBo</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Word is now coming out of the White House, via correspondence with  	Health Care Advocacy groups, that the administration may be abandoning its  	fight for the public option and several other <strong>KEY</strong> elements of the  	reform bill.  While some White House insiders seem to support the idea  	that &#8220;<em>some bill, even a bad bill, is better than no bill</em>&#8220;&#8230;too many  	people disagree.  House Speaker Pelosi 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26742.html">has chosen to  	side</a> with the caucus of Democratic Progressives who are saying that they 	<strong>WILL NOT</strong> support a bill that does not include the public option.   	Representative Weiner 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/04/anthony-weiner-obama-hasn_n_277640.html"> has made his own claims</a>, that these compromises represent a failure of  	leadership on the part of the President&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/olbermann-obama-could-fac_n_277075.html">and  	as some point out</a>, if &#8220;<strong>change we can believe in</strong>&#8221; becomes &#8220;<strong>change  	we can barely stomach</strong>,&#8221; Obama could face challenges in the next  	primaries from Democrats claiming that they would show a bit more backbone  	if given the majority in both houses of Congress.  <strong>I think the votes  	are in: </strong> if the majority of the public wants reform and the public  	option to be a part of that reform, and you control all of Congress, and all  	the Republican minority promises is dissent&#8230;then you really have no excuse  	for not going to the mat, fighting for the best reform possible.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Stand Back, Genius At Work:</strong> Robert F. McDonnell is a  	candidate for Virginia Governor, and in a recent speech, he proudly  	mentioned his Master&#8217;s thesis, which he wrote while attending an evangelical  	college in Virginia Beach.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Apparently</span>&#8230;McDonnell didn&#8217;t think  	anyone 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/29/AR2009082902434_pf.html"> would bother to look up the thesis</a> in question&#8230;<strong>but they did</strong>.   	The thesis, which outlines the steps McDonnell suggested the Republican  	Party should take to &#8220;<em>protect</em>&#8221; families&#8230;says that feminists and  	working women are &#8220;<strong>detrimental</strong>&#8221; to families, contraception for  	unmarried people is &#8220;<strong>illogical</strong>,&#8221; and that government should show  	clear preference for married people and not &#8220;<strong>cohabitators, homosexuals or  	fornicators.</strong>&#8220;  Hear that <strong>WHOOSHING</strong> sound? Enjoy your trip  	down the political whirlpool, Mr. McDonnell.</li>
<li>First Representative Lynn Jenkins (R-KS) made the mistake of referring  	to Republican&#8217;s search for a viable presidential candidate as the quest to  	find &#8220;<strong>The Great White Hope.</strong>&#8220;  Jenkins then responded to the  	resulting outcry, by stating that she had no idea that this was a racist  	sentiment referring back to the search for a white boxer who could defeat  	black boxing champion, Jack Johnson.  <strong>THEN</strong>&#8230;we find out that  	back in <strong>JULY</strong> (<em>that&#8217;s right, just a few months ago</em>), Jenkins  	supported a resolution that explicitly <strong>STATED</strong> the history of the  	phrase: &#8220;<strong>Whereas the victory by Jack Johnson over Tommy Burns prompted a  	search for a White boxer who could beat Jack Johnson, a recruitment effort  	that was dubbed the search for the &#8216;great white hope.&#8217;</strong>&#8220;  Jenkins  	new position?  She 	<a href="http://www.ottawaherald.com/story/082809jenkinsvote">says she never  	read the resolution</a>, choosing to look like an incompetent legislator,  	rather than a racist.</li>
<li>Minnesota Republican Representative Michele Bachmann is now well known  	for making odd and inflammatory statements (<em>most recently she proposed  	that health care legislation should be defeated with &#8220;fasting and prayer&#8221;</em>).   	But now, <a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200909040004">she has  	her own theory</a> why Democrats, and apparently most of her constituents,  	want her out of office: &#8220;<strong>Also with women politicians, </strong><strong>they  	want to make sure no women, no woman becomes president before a Democrat  	woman, and so they&#8217;re doing everything they can to, I think, sabotage women  	like Sarah Palin, perhaps women like myself,</strong><strong> or similarly  	situated women, to make sure that we don&#8217;t have a prominent national voice.   	But the thing is, the people in our country, they don&#8217;t care who the voice  	is, they just want someone, they want to know that someone is speaking out  	for them against what will certainly bring about the destruction of our  	great country if we continue to go down the Obama path.</strong>&#8220;   	Yeah&#8230;it&#8217;s the <strong>DEMOCRATS</strong> who have such a pronounced diversity  	problem&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GHOSTS OF OUR PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number One:</strong> President Obama has now reversed his  	initial position, and has said that the White House visitor records 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/04/white-house-visitor-logs_n_277227.html"> will be released</a> to the public, in a clear reversal of Bush policy.   	That&#8217;s great&#8230;one down, eleven to go.  Next we&#8217;d like to see an end to  	renditions, warrantless wiretaps, signing statements, excessive use of the &#8220;<em>State  	Secrets</em>&#8221; defense, and refusal of Due Process to detainees&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number Two:</strong> Former Secretary of Homeland Defense  	Tom Ridge stunned many when his book was released and clearly indicated that  	he had been suspiciously pressured to raise the Terror Alert Level.  He  	surprised everyone 	<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/ridge-dont-believe-everything-you-read----especially-on-my-book-jacket.php?ref=fpb"> even more</a> when he went on Rachel Maddow&#8217;s show, denied that the claim  	was true, said that any suspicions he had in the past he now knew were false  	(<em>but not for any particular reason&#8230;he just &#8220;knows&#8221;</em>),  he  	criticizes the government response to Katrina&#8230;then defends it, and he says  	that even though every reason the government gave us for going into Iraq has  	been proven false, it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>ok</em>&#8221; because it was really always about  	bringing democracy to the country.  Rachel&#8230;<strong>seemed to take issue&#8230;</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qIzsZ3g7dTU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qIzsZ3g7dTU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIzsZ3g7dTU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIzsZ3g7dTU</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number Three:</strong> Former Attorney General Alberto  	Gonzales&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/alberto-gonzales-flip-flo_n_276899.html">raised  	a few eyebrows</a> when he stated that he approved of Attorney General  	Holder&#8217;s investigation into interrogators who exceeded the bounds of the  	controversial DOJ memos justifying torture: &#8220;.<strong>..if people go beyond that,  	I think it is legitimate to question and examine that conduct to ensure  	people are held accountable for their actions, even if it&#8217;s action in  	prosecuting the war on terror.</strong>&#8220;  It took about a day for Alberto to  	change his mind: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t support the investigation by the department  	because this is a matter that has already been reviewed thoroughly and  	because I believe that another investigation is going to harm our  	intelligence gathering capabilities and that&#8217;s a concern that&#8217;s shared by  	career intelligence officials and so for those reasons I respectfully  	disagree with the decision.</strong>&#8220;  I don&#8217;t know how he keeps from  	getting whiplash&#8230;my neck hurts just reading this.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The <em>Today Show</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/30/today-show-hires-jenna-bu_n_272220.html"> has a new hire</a>:  Jenna Hager, formerly Jenna Bush, daughter of  	former President George Bush.  Ok&#8230;yes, she has knowledge of &#8220;<em>living  	in the White House</em>,&#8221; but that does not equal &#8220;<em>White House insider  	knowledge.</em>&#8220;  She is a fledgling school teacher&#8230;but that does not  	make her an &#8220;<em>expert on education.</em>&#8220;  Lastly, besides her apparent  	expertise in <strong>NOTHING</strong>, I&#8217;m just not certain that hiring the daughter  	of one of the most partisan presidents in recent history will result in  	anything resembling unbiased, non-partisan journalism.  <em>Just my  	prediction&#8230;</em></li>
<li><strong>How Does This Guy Stay On Television:</strong> Pat Buchanan&#8230;it&#8217;s  	not bad enough that he was part of Nixon&#8217;s cabal&#8230;or that when running for  	president he revealed a deep-seated anger towards immigrants&#8230;and later as  	a columnist and MSNBC commentator, he voiced racist and anti-Semitic  	sentiments&#8230;but now, his recent column &#8220;<em>Did Hitler Want War</em>,&#8221;  	Buchanan seems to defend the worst genocidal dictator in world history.  	<a href="http://buchanan.org/blog/did-hitler-want-war-2068">You be the judge</a>.   	When a man has an 	<a href="http://www.adl.org/special_reports/buchanan_own_words/buchanan_intro.asp"> entire page</a> dedicated to him on the Anti-Defamation League&#8217;s (ADL)  	website, maybe he should not be featured so prominently in the mainstream  	media&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY</strong></span>:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Has everybody lost their minds? </em> When I heard that the  	President was going to address the nation&#8217;s schoolchildren, I thought &#8220;<em>big  	deal.</em>&#8220;  Presidents do this.  All presidents&#8230;both parties.   	They say &#8220;<em>hey, stay in school&#8230;don&#8217;t do drugs&#8230;you could be presidents  	someday&#8230;wink.</em>&#8220;  Well, the conservative media, and the GOP,  	specifically the Florida Republican Party, have decided that the message is  	an attempt to&#8230;wait for it&#8230;<strong>INDOCTRINATE OUR CHILDREN</strong>.  They  	say kids, &#8220;<strong>will be forced to watch the president justify his plans for  	government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies, increasing  	taxes on those who create jobs, and racking up more debt than any other  	president.</strong>&#8220;  Of course&#8230;this is <strong>BEYOND</strong> ridiculous, and  	Politifact.com 	<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/sep/02/republican-party-florida/republican-party-florida-says-obama-will-indoctrin/"> has chosen</a> to give the myth the much coveted &#8220;<em>Pants On Fire</em>&#8221;  	designation.</li>
</ul>
<p>That brings this week to a much-needed close.  Have a wonderful Labor  Day weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soon-To-Be-Ex-Governor Palin: Stick A Fork In Her Fellas&#8230;She&#8217;s Done</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Ed Rendell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Murkowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/modules/wordpress/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re back! After a week of vacation, and a week of playing catch-up at work, I am finally in a position to take some time to do a quick posting. The links have been stacking up&#8230;so I think I&#8217;ll just clear the slate, and choose one thing to focus on for the first day back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We&#8217;re back!</strong> After a week of vacation, and a week of playing catch-up at  work, I am finally in a position to take some time to do a quick posting.   The links have been stacking up&#8230;so I think I&#8217;ll just clear the slate, and  choose one thing to focus on for the first day back at it.</p>
<p>And that one subject&#8230;would have to be <strong>SARAH PALIN</strong>&#8230;</p>
<p>I have so much material, that I think it&#8217;s probably impossible to weave these  into any sort of cogent narrative.  So, I guess I&#8217;ll simply try to  categorize and summarize as best as I am able:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE BOMBSHELL RESIGNATION:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>On July 3rd, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin shocked <strong>EVERYBODY</strong> by  	announcing that she not only wouldn&#8217;t run for another term as governor&#8230;but  	she also <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>wouldn&#8217;t even be finishing her first term</strong></span>.  She plans to leave  	office on July 26 to pursue&#8230;<em>well</em>&#8230;keep reading.  The full video and  	written transcript of her announcement can be found 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/03/sarah-palin-resignation-s_n_225557.html"> here</a>.  The speech&#8230;was <em>classic</em> Palin.  It was badly written,  	rambling on-and-on without much in the way of an organized structure.  It  	was badly delivered&#8230;breathlessly spewed forth in a torrent of incomplete  	sentences and rambling tangents.  There was also an obvious  	disregard for atmosphere reminiscent of Sarah&#8217;s ill-fated Thanksgiving  	interview in front of a slaughtering table &#8211; She chose to deliver the  	announcement in an area populated by loudly (<em>and somewhat comically</em>)  	honking geese, and these surroundings lent a somewhat distracting and  	surreal feel to the whole event.</li>
<li>According to Sarah&#8230;she&#8217;s leaving because of the distraction presented  	by all of the  	ethics charges against her&#8230;and the cost of defending against those  	charges&#8230;and she&#8217;s not finishing her term, but she&#8217;s not quitting, because  	she&#8217;s going to keep on &#8220;<em>fighting</em>&#8220;&#8230;but she won&#8217;t say what she will be  	fighting, or how, just that she&#8217;s not really &#8220;<em>quitting</em>&#8221; because she&#8217;ll still  	be &#8220;<em>fighting</em>.&#8221;  She later responded that it has been considered  	&#8220;<strong>honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher  	calling.</strong>&#8221;  No word as to what this higher calling might be&#8230;McCain 	<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5624MB20090704">seems  	to think</a> she will serve as some sort of Republican leadership  	figure, however, most experts see her political future as bleak.  Governor Mike Huckabee 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/05/huckabee-palin-may-not-be_n_225863.html"> says those very ethics charges</a> and her decision to leave office mid-term  	nearly negate the chances of a future presidential run.  Even Karl Rove, who  	get get conservatives to vote for a dead cat, thinks her &#8220;<em>strategy</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31753561/ns/politics-more_politics/">is  	risky and that her options are few</a>.</li>
<li>And Sarah also wants us to know that she&#8217;s really not walking out on her  	responsibilities&#8230;because he &#8220;<em>lame-duck</em>&#8221; status prevents her from getting  	any real work done.  Unfortunately for Sarah, <strong>NOBODY</strong> considers halfway  	through one&#8217;s first term a &#8220;<em>lame-duck</em>&#8221; period&#8230;in fact, this is a period  	where a governor <strong>SHOULD</strong> be able to accomplish quite a bit.  The  	Alaskans who elected her are 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31756939/ns/politics-more_politics/"> more than a little disappointed</a>&#8230;since they elected her hoping she  	would perform some <span style="text-decoration: underline;">actual</span> work.   In fact, one legislator  	spoke of Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>surprising amount of disinterest in state government  	after November&#8230;This state has a lot of problems, and she showed a complete  	lack of interest in solving them.</strong>&#8221;  Alaska&#8217;s Republican Senator  	Lisa Murkowski 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/L_Murkowski_Deeply_disappointed_Palin_has_decided_to_abandon_the_state_.html?showall"> was even harsher</a> in her criticism of Palin&#8217;s move: &#8220;<strong>I am deeply  	disappointed that the Governor has decided to abandon the State and her  	constituents before her term has concluded.</strong>&#8221; Governor Ed Rendell,  	(D-Penn) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/rendell-lays-into-palin-c_n_226438.html"> took offense</a>&#8230;criticizing her characterization of lame-duck governors,  	her designation of herself as such, and her choice to leave office during a  	recession: &#8220;<strong>To resign after two-and-a-half years in office and somehow to  	say that she was going to be a lame duck and lame ducks can&#8217;t get anything  	done and governors just go on junkets during her lame-duck period is  	ridiculous.  First of all, she&#8217;s a first-term governor, not a  	term-limited, second-term governor, and if she hadn&#8217;t announced she was  	leaving, she wouldn&#8217;t have been a lame duck, she would have been in a pretty  	strong executive position, number one. Number two, this is not the time for  	governors to abandon their states&#8230;Everyone of us is facing severe  	financial challenges brought about by the international recession and this  	is not a time to leave. We pledged to our folks when we asked them to elect  	to us, we pledged that we were going to serve four years and we serve in the  	good years, but we also serve in the bad years as well. And for her to leave  	and turn the state over to a lieutenant governor with less than a month&#8217;s  	notice, in the midst of difficult financial times, I think it&#8217;s just dead  	wrong.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Oh, and  	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/Palin_hammers_media_hints_at_national_ambitions.html?showall">it&#8217;s the media&#8217;s fault</a>, too.   	According to Palin, the mainstream media has been completely unfair to her  	and her family, they would not have gone after any other candidate the way  	they have pursued her&#8230;and she would still like to be in front of the  	cameras and allowed to talk as much as possible and if all the members of  	the mainstream press wouldn&#8217;t mind coming to see her fishing at the  	shoreline, she&#8217;d like to talk to all of them.  She said this&#8230;as she  	alluded to her future political aspirations: &#8220;<strong>How sad that Washington and  	the media will never understand; it’s about country&#8230;And though it&#8217;s  	honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher calling  	and without finishing a term, of course we know by now, for some reason a  	different standard applies for the decisions I make.</strong>&#8221;  You know&#8230;I  	could quote from this wonderful article, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/the-myth-of-how-the-media_b_226136.html"> dispelling the myth</a> that the media has been somehow &#8220;<em>harder</em>&#8221; on  	Palin&#8230;or I could show 	<a href="http://wonkette.com/409665/sarah-palins-advice-for-lady-politicians-ignore-mean-old-media"> this clip</a> from August of last year where Sarah chastises Hillary Clinton  	for &#8220;<em>whining</em>&#8221; about the media, and says that it &#8220;<em>bothers her</em>&#8221;  	when female politicians proclaim themselves victims of the press.   	Instead&#8230;I&#8217;ll call it what it is: <strong>cry-baby bullshit</strong>.  No,  	Sarah, you don&#8217;t get to pop out of nowhere as a virtual unknown, and run for  	Vice President&#8230;with a radicalized, secessionist husband&#8230;and an unwed,  	pregnant daughter&#8230;and ties to extreme, evangelical religion&#8230;and a  	history of abuse of power and ethics complaints&#8230;and a history of taking  	huge amounts of public money to fund failed projects&#8230;and then proceed to  	go ill-prepared into debates and interviews where you <strong>CONTINUALLY</strong> reveal your general lack of education, lack of knowledge of government, and  	lack of reasoning skills&#8230;<strong>AND THEN COMPLAIN THAT THE MEDIA IS TREATING  	YOU DIFFERENTLY</strong>.  The media would treat any candidate in the same  	situation, with the same background, and who exercises the same poor  	judgment the <strong>SAME WAY</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES &#8211; WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND THIS?</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Unconfirmed gossip</strong>:  let&#8217;s get this out of the way&#8230;some  	have said that Sarah was trying to get ahead of the results of very damaging  	federal investigation&#8230;however the FBI says it is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">in no way</span> investigating Palin.  If there is some damning piece of gossip or some  	pending investigation&#8230;there&#8217;s no proof of it.  Others have said Palin  	wishes to continue to 	<a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/309/story/68034.html">pursue lucrative  	book deals</a>&#8230;maybe even a position on Fox News or some other  	conservative outlet as a contributor.  Again, even if this is the  	case&#8230;there&#8217;s no evidence to support it, other than the face that she has  	signed a memoir deal with HarperCollins Publishers, which is a pretty  	standard practice for politicians.</li>
<li><strong>Presidential Run</strong>:  As mentioned earlier&#8230;even Huckabee,  	Rove, and a wealth of other Republicans and GOP campaign advisors think  	Sarah&#8217;s chances of a 2012 presidential run are <strong>SLIM</strong>.  However&#8230;<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-07-07-palin-poll_N.htm">polls  	show</a> that a majority of self-identified Republican voters would still  	vote for her for president (<em>of course, with self-identified Democrats and  	Independents&#8230;not so much</em>).  I&#8217;ll just say this:  I have a  	good friend who I consider to be a very intelligent conservative.  Back  	during the last election, he defended Palin to me&#8230;saying that it is not so  	important that she is not very intelligent, because her &#8220;<em>charm</em>&#8221; is  	such a powerful tool.  This same friend&#8230;posted on Facebook recently  	that he believes Palin should step out of the spotlight, because her  	intelligence is obviously <strong>SO LOW</strong> as to not even meet the minimum  	requirements for the presidential office.  I&#8217;m glad to see he has come  	around and finally grasped what I hold to be an obvious truth.</li>
<li><strong>Maybe she&#8217;s just nuts</strong>:  no article did so much to damage  	Sarah Palin as Todd Purdom&#8217;s opus for <em>Vanity Fair</em> titled &#8220;<em>It Came  	From Wasilla.</em>&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/sarah-palin200908"> I highly recommend reading the entire piece</a>.  The article forced a 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24392.html">major  	division</a> in the GOP&#8230;between those who were willing to admit to the  	horrific strategic mistake that was choosing Sarah Palin as the VP  	candidate, and those still blinded by&#8230;well, <em>whatever</em>.  In  	short (<em>I mean <span style="text-decoration: underline;">really</span> short, given Purdom&#8217;s article is 10,000 words  	long</em>) Palin appears to be not very bright, not very experienced, not  	very savvy&#8230;and perhaps just a bit nuts: &#8220;<strong>Several told me, independently  	of one another, that they had consulted the definition of ‘narcissistic  	personality disorder’ in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental  	Disorders &#8211; ‘a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior),  	need for admiration, and lack of empathy’ &#8211; and thought it fit her  	perfectly.</strong>&#8221;  Or maybe Liz Trotta, a contributor for Fox News, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/fox-news-contributor-rips_n_226370.html"> put it best the other day</a> when she said, &#8220;<strong>the woman is inarticulate,  	undereducated&#8230;I think all the liberal stylists&#8230;really have a case. She  	just begs for adjectives like flaky and wacky&#8230;We&#8217;re talking about somebody  	who, right from the get-go, has been a flashy person who gets into a lot of  	trouble and really has no credentials for any job.</strong>&#8221;  Wow&#8230;well  	said, Liz.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE ENSUING LAUGHTER:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Seeing as Sarah&#8217;s announcement comes so close on the heels of her spat  	with David Letterman&#8230;one can hardly fault him for taking a parting  	shot&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">or twelve</span>.  Here&#8217;s his Top Ten list of messages on Palin&#8217;s  	answering machine.  <strong>Enjoy.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jcWf4__Fybs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jcWf4__Fybs&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course, Keith Olbermann couldn&#8217;t resist a bit of tongue-in-cheek  	analysis of these developments&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/07/olbermann-tackles-palins_n_227471.html">here is his segment</a> titled appropriately &#8220;<em>Palin&#8217;s  	Paling Prospects.</em>&#8221;  It mostly revolves around Andrea Mitchell&#8217;s  	interview with Palin at the water&#8217;s edge (<em>Palin had just stepped out of a  	fishing boat&#8230;hip waders and all</em>)&#8230;where Palin continues to flounder (<em>no  	fishing pun intended</em>) while attempting to explain both her motives and her  	ambitions.  For me, the highlight is when Sarah refers to the federal  	government&#8217;s &#8220;<em>Department of Law,</em>&#8221; once again reminding me of how close we  	came to having this woman as Vice President&#8230;a person who has no knowledge  	of how our government or laws <span style="text-decoration: underline;">actually</span> work.  And here&#8230;is a  	brief Palin retrospective:</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mh1umqieC7w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mh1umqieC7w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that we will have no more need for my regular &#8220;<em>Palinwatch</em>&#8221; segments,  but the truth (<em>and you and I both know it</em>) is that she&#8217;s not going <strong>ANYWHERE</strong> and  we will certainly hear from her again&#8230;for better or worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/soon-to-be-ex-governor-palin-stick-a-fork-in-her-fellasshes-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

