<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Health Care Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/health-care-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Political Carnival &#8211; Five Craziest Things I Saw This Week</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/political-carnival-five-craziest-things-i-saw-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/political-carnival-five-craziest-things-i-saw-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Family Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim-Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overcriminalized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to "catch up" on our nation's political carnival, I present simply the five craziest things I read/saw this week:  Health Care antics, Heritage Foundation hates laws against sex offenders, AFA says no muslims in the military, Carrie Prejean falls from her pedestal, and Lou Dobbs finally quits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to &#8220;<em>catch up</em>&#8221; on our nation&#8217;s political carnival, I  present simply the <strong>five craziest things</strong> I read/saw this week:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HEALTH CARE: RETURN OF THE BUNGLED TEA PARTY PROTESTS -</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Congressional Republicans have been holding a series of protests on the  	hill regarding health care reform legislation&#8230;of course they&#8217;re not  	calling them &#8220;<em>protests</em>,&#8221; but are rather using the term &#8220;<em>press  	conferences.</em>&#8220;  It&#8217;s what we have come to expect:  buses  	sponsored by &#8220;<em>astroturf</em>&#8221; groups dumping groups of disgruntled  	citizens at the Capitol steps&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.  Wildly inaccurate,  	misspelled, racist, and occasionally simply bizarre 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/the-12-most-offensive-sig_n_347398.html?slidenumber=YQKSlGc5xDU="> hand-held signs</a> (<em>including one featuring pictures of holocaust  	victims, comparing health reform to Nazi genocide</em>)&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.   	A Republican legislator (<em>Rep. Todd Akin, R-MO</em>) 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/05/akin-pledge/">botching</a> the  	Pledge of Allegiance right after extolling the importance of the pledge&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.   	Another Republican representative (<em>John Boehner, R-OH</em>) holding up a  	copy of the Constitution, claiming that it is the most important guide to  	his actions and that he&#8217;d like to read a little excerpt from it&#8230;then 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/bungled-pledge-of-allegia_n_347278.html"> proceeding to read</a> from the Declaration of Independence&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.   	Fox News, using an outdated photograph to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/12/hannity-jon-stewart-was-r_n_354887.html"> misrepresent the attendance</a> at the gathering (<em>not the first time  	they&#8217;ve done this</em>), only to get busted by Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily  	Show</em>&#8230;<strong>check</strong>.  For your viewing pleasure, here&#8217;s the <em> Daily Show</em> clip:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:255662" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:255662" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>The protests weren&#8217;t the only &#8220;<em>health-care related</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/11/the-craziest-examples-of_n_354333.html"> spectacle</a>.  Here again is Jon Stewart&#8230;to address the <strong>OTHER</strong> antics of our elected officials:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254903" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254903" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: Pro-Sex Offender?</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>If you&#8217;ve heard about the conservative Heritage Foundation, it is  	probably due to the health care debate&#8230;where they have been quick to  	provide reform opponents with a variety of unfathomably unscientific and  	skewed &#8220;<em>studies</em>&#8221; with which to do battle.  They also have some 	<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200911090001">rather interesting  	legal opinions</a>, which they present on their sister website, 	<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/rd?to=http://www.overcriminalized.com/default.aspx"> Overcriminalized.com</a>.  The Heritage Foundation claims that the site  	&#8220;.<strong>..describes the trend in America -- and particularly in Congress -- to  	use the criminal law to &#8220;solve&#8221; every problem, punish every mistake (instead  	of making proper use of civil penalties), and coerce Americans into  	conforming their behavior to satisfy social engineering objectives</strong>.&#8221;   	What examples do they give of unnecessary laws, to address minor &#8220;<em>mistakes</em>&#8221;  	that they&#8217;d rather see handled in civil proceedings?  How about HR5652,  	the Child Slavery Prevention Act of 2008&#8230;which provides strict sentences  	to people who engage in human trafficking and sex slavery.  And they&#8217;re  	not too fond of HR1632, the International Megan&#8217;s Law of 2009, which  	requires that sex offenders report any intention of travelling abroad, and  	prevents foreign sex offenders who committed their crimes against children  	from coming into our country.  And there&#8217;s HR3513, Prevention and  	Deterrence Of Crimes Against Children Act of 2009 (<em>strongly penalizes  	those involved in child pornography</em>), HR288, Save Our Children: Stop The  	Violent Predators Against Children DNA Act of 2009 (<em>created the DNA  	database for use in identifying and prosecuting sex predators</em>), and  	S431, Keeping the Internet Devoid of Sex Predators (KIDS) Act of 2007 (<em>sex  	offenders have to register all online identifiers, IP address, email  	accounts, usernames, chat names</em>).   Besides being an  	absolutely inane position to take, claiming that these bills are anything  	except a <strong>GOOD</strong> thing&#8230;it certainly seems an odd stance for a group  	that likes to portray themselves as the &#8220;<em>law and order</em>&#8221; crowd.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CONSERVATIVES: NO MUSLIMS IN THE MILITARY -</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>You didn&#8217;t need to have a crystal ball to know that the right-wing  	response to the recent, tragic shooting at Fort Hood in Texas 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091107/ap_on_re_us/us_fort_hood_muslims_in_the_military"> would focus on the fact</a> that the shooter was a Muslim.  First there  	were calls for &#8220;<em>screening Muslims</em>&#8221; who want to serve in the military.   	Besides the obviously xenophobic and discriminatory aspects of this  	suggestion,  it is clear that effecting such a policy would be  	difficult, given our military has been repeatedly and desperately lowering  	its recruiting standards, and currently fails to &#8220;<em>screen out</em>&#8221; members  	of biker gangs, street gangs, assorted violent felons, and individuals with  	terrifying mental histories.  Now, the American Family Association (<em>you  	guessed it&#8230;with a name like that, it has to be a conservative activism  	group</em>) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/09/conservative-group-time-t_n_350945.html"> wants</a> to take things a step further: they call for a ban on Muslims in  	the military.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Quick little bit of history:</strong></span> In  	WWII&#8230;some of our greatest heroes were German-American soldiers who were  	very much in touch with their ancestry, but they put America first.   	Also during WWII, Japanese-American soldiers, despite the internment of so  	many Japanese-Americans in camps&#8230;they put America first, served this  	country, and were recognized for their bravery and sacrifice.  If we  	were fighting in a Christian nation&#8230;would Christians not be allowed to  	serve, for fear of divided loyalty?  <strong>No</strong>&#8230;and Muslim-Americans  	who choose to bravely serve and protect our nation should continue to be  	afforded not only the opportunity&#8230;<em>but also our full gratitude and  	respect</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CARRIE PREJEAN: FALL OF A POORLY CONCEIVED CONSERVATIVE ROLE MODEL -</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Quick Version:</strong></span> Carrie Prejean, Miss California,  	loses the Miss America pageant after saying that she opposes gay marriage.   	Conservatives immediately hail Prejean as a hero, a wholesome Christian  	girl, and a victim of &#8220;<em>political correctness.</em>&#8220;  Prejean makes  	the rounds, speaking at conservative symposiums, tearfully recalling how she  	believes her First Amendment rights were violated (<em>for the hundredth  	time&#8230;no, Carrie: the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">government</span> never prevented you from exercising  	your free speech</em>).  The Miss California Pageant fires Prejean, and  	wants the money for her boob job back (<em>they paid for it</em>) because  	despite being a &#8220;<em>wholesome Christian girl</em>&#8221; Prejean apparently never  	learned the whole &#8220;<em>Christian-work-ethic-thing,</em>&#8221; and has been ditching  	on her contractual commitments.  Prejean cries &#8220;<em>religious  	discrimination</em>&#8221; and sues the pageant for millions.  	<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/"> A sex tape appears</a>&#8230;when the pageant&#8217;s lawyers bring it to a hearing (<em>ouch</em>).   	Prejean drops her lawsuit&#8230;conservative groups drop her as a guest speaker.   	Prejean tries to get her ex-boyfriend (<em>the source of the tape</em>) to say  	it was from a <strong>LONG</strong> time ago&#8230;he refuses and 	<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/12/carrie-prejeans-ex-boyfriend-sex-tape-lie-age/"> tells TMZ</a> it was from 2007.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Now&#8230;here&#8217;s my favorite part:</strong></span> despite all this, Prejean is <strong>STILL</strong> plugging her new book on the talk  	show rounds, and I guess she just didn&#8217;t figure anybody would ask her about  	the lawsuit, and the reason she had to drop it.  Enjoy this bit from <em> Larry King Live</em>, where Prejean regresses to the level of an  	eight-year-old:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GVwwZ1ZJrkE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GVwwZ1ZJrkE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVwwZ1ZJrkE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVwwZ1ZJrkE</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>LOU DOBBS: DON&#8217;T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU&#8230;</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Lou Dobbs&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/11/lou-dobbs-to-depart-cnn_n_354623.html">has  	quit CNN</a>.   When one examines even just his most awful, most  	racist, most insane moments (<em>much less his consistent stream of  	unresearched, patently false, and journalistically irresponsible claims</em>),  	you are left asking: <strong>Why was he allowed to continue for so long?</strong> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/11/lou-dobbs-most-scandalous_n_354803.html"> Here&#8217;s a compilation</a> of some of Lou&#8217;s worst moments&#8230;CNN is planning to  	replace him with 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/12/john-king-to-replace-lou_n_355199.html"> John King</a>, which can only be an improvement.</li>
</ul>
<p>Tomorrow&#8230;it&#8217;s time for our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition, where  we&#8217;ll try to wrap up all remaining items from the week.  Until then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/political-carnival-five-craziest-things-i-saw-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Insurance Industry&#8217;s Eleventh Hour Threat&#8230;Misfires</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Ignagni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark McClellan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PricewaterhouseCoopers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Snowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Senate Finance Committee's version of the Health Care Reform Bill comes up for a vote today (as I'm writing this, it passed), we should have expected that there might be some "Eleventh Hour Drama."  It should also be a surprise to NO ONE that the sources of this drama...are the Republicans and the Health Insurance Industry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s version of the Health Care Reform Bill  comes up for a vote today (<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33290417/ns/politics-health_care_reform/">as  I&#8217;m writing this, it passed</a>), we should have expected that there might be  some &#8220;<em>Eleventh Hour Drama</em>.&#8221;  It should also be a surprise to <strong>NO  ONE</strong> that the sources of this drama&#8230;are the Republicans and the Health Insurance  Industry.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s take a quick look at the recent activities within each camp:</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Democrats:</strong></span> Working under the assumption that the bill  will survive the committee, Democrats are already heavily engaged in internal  negotiations.  It is important to remember that the so-called &#8220;<em>Baucus  Bill</em>&#8221; will have to be merged/reconciled with the Health Care Reform bills  coming out of the other Senate and House committees.  While most of these  bills carry a large number of common elements, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/12/AR2009101203165_pf.html"> Democrats are working to resolve</a> within their own ranks the support for  things such as the &#8220;<em>public option</em>,&#8221; and whether the bill will be &#8220;<em>paid  for</em>&#8221; with income-based taxes (<em>preferred in the House</em>) or taxes on the  so-called &#8220;<em>cadillac policies</em>&#8221; (<em>favored in the Senate</em>).</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Republicans:</strong></span> The GOP is having internal disputes as  well&#8230;<em>but of a very different nature</em>.  The current leadership has  drawn a hard line in pushing a &#8220;<strong>kill the bill, and defeat Obama</strong>&#8221; policy.   This policy was dealt its first blow, as Republican strategists pointed out that  &#8220;<strong>Yay, We Killed Health Care Reform</strong>&#8221; is not a slogan they&#8217;ll want to use  in the 2010 and 2012 elections&#8230;defeating Obama might look good on paper, but  if it means publicly destroying the reform of a dismal health care system, then  it will likely cost them more votes than it gains.  Then, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-10-07-gop-healthcare_N.htm"> another shock to the system</a>: respected, GOP, elder statesmen started coming  forward in support of Health Care Reform&#8230;some of them experts on Health Care.   These figures included former Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy  Thompson, former Senate Majority Leader and presidential candidate Bob Dole,  former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (<em>a surgeon</em>),  former  administrator of Medicare and Medicaid Mark McClellan.  These men would  soon be joined by some very high profile members of the current leadership,  California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal,  the latter of which is considered a health care policy expert.</p>
<p>While these announcements of support of Health Care Reform may have swayed  some critical, moderate members of the GOP&#8230;their party leadership was unfazed,  and they promptly let it be known that there would be consequences for GOP  members who supported reform.  Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), who holds a  key vote on the Senate Finance Committee, <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62727-sens-snowe-risks-perch">would  likely not be given the chairmanship</a> of the Commerce, Science and  Transportation Committee, a post for which she is next in line. <em>Snowe&#8217;s  answer</em>?  She&#8217;s <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/snowe-voting-yes-on-senat_n_318745.html"> voting for the bill</a>: &#8220;<strong>Is this bill all that I would want? Far from it.   Is it all that it can be? No. But when history calls, history calls, and I  happen to think that the consequences of inaction dictate the urgency of  Congress to take every opportunity to demonstrate its capacity to solve the  monumental issues of our time.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Health Insurance Industry:</strong></span> Up until yesterday, the industry  was thought to be &#8220;<em>on board</em>&#8221; with the Baucus Bill.  Why <strong>WOULDN&#8217;T</strong> they be?  It has everything they could hope for:  No public option&#8230;.<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.   Everyone forced to buy their policies&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Fines for people who  refuse to buy their policies&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Huge government subsidies so  they&#8217;ll cover poorer people&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Few reforms forcing them to  offer better policies and service&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  No significant price  controls&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  So why, on the eve of the vote, would the  industry&#8217;s top lobbying group, America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), suddenly  declare war on the bill?  <strong>Two reasons&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><strong>1 -</strong> While it requires people to buy their lousy and overpriced  policies, and fines people if they don&#8217;t&#8230;the industry doesn&#8217;t <strong>THINK THE  FINES ARE HIGH ENOUGH</strong>.  So&#8230;they worry that they&#8217;ll only get 20  million new customers, not all 40 million uninsured.</p>
<p><strong>2 -</strong> The new requirement that they have to cover sick people and people  with pre-existing conditions&#8230;will just plain eat into their profits too much.</p>
<p>So, AHIP and it&#8217;s president Karen Ignagni, have released a study, a day  before the vote, that constitutes a simple <strong>THREAT</strong>:  &#8220;<em>If you pass  this bill&#8230;we&#8217;ll just have to raise everybody&#8217;s premiums by 111%.</em>&#8220;   Then, just for good measure&#8230;they <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/ahip-ad-campaign-targets_n_318690.html"> started running ads</a> trying to scare seniors that their Medicare Benefits  would be cut.</p>
<p>The reaction of the White House and Congress&#8230;<strong>NOT WHAT AHIP EXPECTED</strong>.   The White House <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/white-house-office-of-hea_n_317973.html"> pointed out that the timing of the report</a> is clearly political in nature (<em>thank  you, Captain Obvious</em>)&#8230;members of Congress, including members of the Senate  Finance Committee, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/senate-finance-committee-slams-ahip-report.php"> condemned the report</a> as &#8220;<strong>untrue, disingenuous</strong>&#8220;&#8230;health care experts  and critics point out that the assumptions of the study are quite extreme, and  that the company responsible for the study, <em>PricewaterhouseCoopers</em>, is  the same company that produced a study on behalf of &#8220;<em>Big Tobacco</em>&#8221; years  ago, and that study showed that taxes on cigarettes would lead to <strong>economic  armageddon</strong>.</p>
<p>But the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/weiner-ahip-report-makes_n_317561.html"> best reaction</a> came from some rather astute legislators like Representative  Anthony Weiner (D-NY):  This outlandish study&#8230;shows <strong>EXACTLY WHY</strong> we  need the public option.  This study, ironically produced by the Health  Insurance lobby, serves to illustrate clearly:</p>
<p>- The only thing to keep the insurance companies from passing on increased  taxes on their business straight onto the premiums of their policyholders&#8230;<strong>is  the public option.</strong></p>
<p>-  The only thing to keep the insurance companies from passing on the  cost of covering sick people and people with pre-existing conditions onto their  other customers&#8230;<strong>is the public option.</strong></p>
<p>-  The only thing to keep the insurance companies from punitively  punishing the American citizenry for supporting health reform&#8230;<strong>is the public  option.</strong></p>
<p>In short, we know that these companies will not allow <strong>ANYTHING</strong> to cut  into their enormous profit margins&#8230;not taxes, not sick people, not  expectations of quality&#8230;not unless they are <strong>PRESSURED</strong> through  competition in the marketplace to do so.  As Representative Weiner points  out, the only way to subject these companies to the pressures of competition, <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> would be through the implementation of a low cost, government-run alternative.</span></p>
<p><em>Otherwise</em>&#8230;for the industry it will just be business as usual.   And we are all very familiar with what <strong>that</strong> looks like.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Parting note:</strong></span> Interesting article on &#8220;<a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/13/five-things-you-dont-know-about-the-senate-health-care-bill/">Five  Things You Don&#8217;t Know About The Senate Health Care Bill.</a>&#8220;  Check it  out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alan Grayson &#8211; Example For Both Parties To Follow</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/alan-grayson-example-for-both-parties-to-follow/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/alan-grayson-example-for-both-parties-to-follow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Grayson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's hard to find someone who doesn't like the film, "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington."  Besides the fact that Americans seem to love an underdog...we also seem to agree that our elected officials should do the following:Tell us the truth, listen to what we do/don't want, realize what we do/don't need, and fight for us.  Meet one representative who seems to be attempting to fulfill all these expectations...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to find someone who doesn&#8217;t like the film, &#8220;<em>Mr. Smith Goes To  Washington.</em>&#8220;  Besides the fact that Americans seem to love an  underdog&#8230;we also seem to agree that our elected officials should do the  following:</p>
<p><strong>1 -- <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Tell us the truth.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>2 -- <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Listen to what we do/don&#8217;t want.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>3 -- <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Realize what we do/don&#8217;t need.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>4 -- <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fight for us.</span></strong></p>
<p>When presented with exactly that kind of legislator, on the silver screen, we  cheer&#8230;our eyes tear up&#8230;and part of us says, &#8220;<strong><em>That&#8217;s</em> what we want.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>Then&#8230;<em>we give up on it.</em></p>
<p>We have grown all too accustomed to our elected officials taking money,  playing politics, lying to us, and otherwise distorting the truth for either  partisan interests or special interests.  We abandon our idealistic hopes  for honest, principled leaders&#8230;and try our best to judge simply &#8220;<em>the lesser  of evils.</em>&#8220;  We barely flinch at a new headline about a senator (<em>who  preached &#8220;character&#8221; and &#8220;morality&#8221;</em>) propositioning men in an airport  bathroom&#8230;we calmly listen as we are told that the senator holding the fate of  health care reform in his hands, has received millions from the health care  industry.  <em>Do we clamor for their removal?  Do we vote them out of  office?</em> <strong>No</strong>&#8230;in fact, we are more likely to re-elect them <em> again, and again, and again.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s why, it should be refreshing to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">all</span> to see a freshman  congressman stand on the floor of the House, and say this:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YxNpyGg_Sgo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YxNpyGg_Sgo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxNpyGg_Sgo">www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxNpyGg_Sgo</a></p></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re like me, you watched this whole clip, including the interview&#8230;<em>and  then you went back and watched the speech <span style="text-decoration: underline;">again</span>.</em></p>
<p>His name is Alan Grayson, freshman representative from the state of Florida.   And yes, he&#8217;s wearing a bad suit&#8230;and yes, he&#8217;s obviously got a quirky sense of  humor&#8230;and yes, he&#8217;s a Democrat.  <strong>And <span style="text-decoration: underline;">none</span> of that should  matter&#8230;because he&#8217;s reminding us what truly DOES matter</strong>.  If we&#8217;ve  forgotten&#8230;and have been lulled into thinking it&#8217;s about who looks  prettier&#8230;or who gives folksier sounding soundbytes for the camera&#8230;or who can  instill the most fear in us&#8230;then <strong>THIS</strong> shall serve as our wake up call.   This is the kind of representative we should expect in <strong>BOTH</strong> parties,  Republican <strong>AND</strong> Democrat.  This is the kind of representative we  should be electing in <strong>ALL</strong> fifty states.  This&#8230;is the kind of voice  that appears to be completely absent from the top leadership of both parties in  Congress.  Most of us would trade away Reid, Pelosi, Boehner, and  McConnell&#8230;for just <strong>ONE</strong> Alan Grayson.</p>
<p>Apparently&#8230;<em>many agree</em>.  Grayson&#8217;s first speech to catch  national attention, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/alan-grayson-republicans_n_303996.html"> can be seen here</a>&#8230;and afterwards his website was flooded with visits, <strong> AND</strong> donations.  People who don&#8217;t even live in Florida are now closely  following, and supporting, Grayson&#8217;s bid for re-election.  People who don&#8217;t  even know the names of their <strong>OWN</strong> senators and representatives, know <strong> HIS</strong> name.</p>
<p><em>Why?</em> Because what he said in the speech&#8230;<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">is true</span>:</strong> when appealing to the better angels of our nature, we really <em>don&#8217;t</em> care  about policies, or procedures, or personalities, or even our representatives&#8217;  itty bitty feelings.  And as jaded as we have become, all it takes is one  elected official behaving as we would hope they all would&#8230;and we start  cheering for the underdog again.</p>
<p><strong>Thank you, Alan Grayson.</strong> Thank you, for being honest, and  cutting through all the semantics, and procedural nonsense, and political  hackery&#8230;to remind us that health care is, in fact, <em>a simple issue</em>.   Thank you for reminding us that people are dying, and the health insurance is  failing us, and that some politicians&#8230;<em>don&#8217;t care</em>.</p>
<p>Because, while it certainly stings to realize how little some of our  representatives care&#8230;it is always inspiring to find one who <strong>REALLY</strong> does.</p>
<p>If you, like so many others, wish to support Grayson&#8230;perhaps to send the message to other politicians that this kind of honesty, real representation, and passion IS what we want&#8230;<a href="http://www.graysonforcongress.com/">here&#8217;s Grayson&#8217;s website.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/alan-grayson-example-for-both-parties-to-follow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

