<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Joe Scarborough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/joe-scarborough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Obama&#8217;s Prize, Mary&#8217;s Baby, And Rush&#8217;s Testicles</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIGNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nataline Sarkisyan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Lowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality Liberation Front blog post our weekly "Chaos Theory" edition...featuring the very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected officials and members of the media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality  Liberation Front blog post our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition&#8230;featuring the  very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected  officials and members of the media.</p>
<p>&#8230;and it has been a <strong>VERY</strong> busy couple of days, leaving us with a lot of  ground to cover, so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The request made a year ago for Sarah Palin&#8217;s emails&#8230;<a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/965388.html">still  	unfulfilled</a> by the Governor&#8217;s Office, that usually responds to such &#8220;<em>public  	record requests</em>&#8221; in <strong>TEN DAYS</strong>.  The department says that it  	sometimes takes longer for &#8220;<em>complicated</em>&#8221; requests&#8230;but since we all  	know that pulling up archived emails is not complicated, some are asking  	what the delay <strong>REALLY</strong> signifies.</li>
<li>Senator Kyl (R-AZ) may have really stepped in it when he mocked women&#8217;s  	need for Maternity Care to be covered by their insurance&#8230;saying it wasn&#8217;t  	fair to include it because, in his words: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t need maternity care</strong>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/kyl-hit-with-local-ads-sh_b_308405.html"> Not only have ads been run</a> in his state, to make women aware of Kyl&#8217;s  	statements&#8230;but now 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/arizona-mothers-storm-kyl_b_313458.html"> mothers are showing up</a> at his Senate Office in protest.  It certain  	doesn&#8217;t help Kyl and the GOP&#8217;s image with women voters, that they voted <strong> AGAINST</strong> an amendment that would bar companies from getting government  	contracts&#8230;if they pressure female employees not to file harassment claims.</li>
<li>In an increasingly disturbing trend involving Republicans attempting  	label Democrats as &#8220;<em>enemies</em>&#8221; of America, Representative Paul Broun  	(R-GA) 	<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/broun-pelosi-a-domestic-enemy-of-the-constitution.php?ref=fpblg"> referred to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi</a> as a &#8220;<strong>domestic enem[y] of the  	Constitution.</strong>&#8220;  Broun wasn&#8217;t finished: &#8220;<strong>When I was sworn into  	the Marine Corps, I was sworn to uphold the Constitution against every  	enemy, foreign and domestic.  We&#8217;ve got a lot of domestic enemies of  	the Constitution and one of those sits in the speaker&#8217;s chair of the United  	States Congress, Nancy Pelosi.</strong>&#8220;  Broun, when you were sworn into  	the Marine Corps, you were also sworn to obey and respect your Commander in  	Chief&#8230;but that didn&#8217;t stop you from calling Obama &#8220;<em>Hitler.</em>&#8220;   	Maybe you didn&#8217;t understand your oath?</li>
<li>Of course, Broun isn&#8217;t the only one lobbing insults at Pelosi&#8230;the  	National Republican Congressional Committee said Pelosi should &#8220;<strong>be put in  	her place</strong>&#8221; over her remarks about Afghanistan.  Number of  	Republican, female legislators and Republican women&#8217;s groups 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/female-republicans-fail-t_n_314265.html"> willing to declare</a> the statement sexist and inappropriate:  <strong>ZERO</strong>.   	Representative Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no</span>.  Representative  	Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nope</span>.  Representative Sue Myrick  	(R-N.C.)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nuh uh</span>.  Representative Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">not  	a word</span>.  Representative Mary Bono Mack&#8217;s (R-CA)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no way</span>.   	The list of shame goes on, and on&#8230;<strong>sad</strong>.</li>
<li>Robert Lowry, the Republican running against Representative Wasserman  	Schultz in her bid for re-election&#8230;well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/robert-lowry-shoots-targe_n_315229.html"> he thought it would fun</a> at a &#8220;<em>shooting event</em>&#8221; to shoot at a  	target, which showed the silhouette of a body, and upon which Wasserman  	Schultz&#8217;s initials had been written next to the head of the target.   	First he tried to call it a &#8220;<strong>joke</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and then later said it was a &#8220;<strong>mistake</strong>.&#8221;   	You were right the second time Lowry&#8230;<em>it&#8217;s a big mistake</em>.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/boehner-pence-vote-agains_n_314194.html"> That&#8217;s right</a>:  the latest defense bill&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">the Republicans are  	voting against it</span>&#8230;because it also has provisions that would protect  	gay people against violence.  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Message received:</span> </strong>The GOP  	believes in defending America&#8217;s citizens&#8230;<em>just not if they&#8217;re gay</em>.</li>
<li>Paul Krugman has written 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion"> an interesting column</a> about the GOP&#8217;s current &#8220;<em>politics of spite</em>:&#8221;   	that they will vote against anything, no matter how worthwhile, if it came  	from the President or other Democrats.  How else can you explain that 	<strong>THIRTY</strong> Republican Senators voted against Al Franken&#8217;s bill to punish  	government contractors who &#8220;<strong>restrict their employees from taking  	workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court?</strong>&#8220;   	The Senators who voted against the bill are:</li>
<p><strong>Alexander (R-TN)<br />
Barrasso (R-WY)<br />
Bond (R-MO)<br />
Brownback (R-KS)<br />
Bunning (R-KY)<br />
Burr (R-NC)<br />
Chambliss (R-GA)<br />
Coburn (R-OK)<br />
Cochran (R-MS)<br />
Corker (R-TN)<br />
Cornyn (R-TX)<br />
Crapo (R-ID)<br />
DeMint (R-SC)<br />
Ensign (R-NV)<br />
Enzi (R-WY)<br />
Graham (R-SC)<br />
Gregg (R-NH)<br />
Inhofe (R-OK)<br />
Isakson (R-GA)<br />
Johanns (R-NE)<br />
Kyl (R-AZ)<br />
McCain (R-AZ)<br />
McConnell (R-KY)<br />
Risch (R-ID)<br />
Roberts (R-KS)<br />
Sessions (R-AL)<br />
Shelby (R-AL)<br />
Thune (R-SD)<br />
Vitter (R-LA)<br />
Wicker (R-MS)</strong></ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>It was a hard week for FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity.  First&#8230;former comedian  	and now noticeably <strong>UNFUNNY</strong> political hack, Dennis Miller (<em>what  	happened to you, Dennis&#8230;seriously</em>) appeared on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor.   	After Miller was done poking fun at CNN and MSNBC&#8230;he went after Hannity  	and Beck.  Of course&#8230;after that, he kissed O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s behind&#8230;and  	Beck&#8217;s&#8230;and Roger Ailes&#8217;&#8230;and all the women on FOX&#8230;<em>yick</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA">www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Next up in Hannity&#8217;s &#8220;<em>not-so-hot</em>&#8221; week&#8230;his smear campaign  	against Kevin Jennings, who President Obama has appointed Assistant Deputy  	Secretary at the Department of Education for the Office of Safe and Drug  	Free Schools, was derailed by Hannity&#8217;s guest, George Stephanopoulos.   	Hannity was, as usual, attempting to misrepresent Jennings as some sort of &#8220;<em>lefty-gay-activist-who-is-going-to-turn-all-kids-gay</em>&#8220;&#8230;but  	George wasn&#8217;t having any of it, and points out that 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/03/kevin-jennings/">the facts just  	aren&#8217;t on Hannity&#8217;s side</a>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4">www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>The third &#8220;<em>Hannity Fail</em>&#8221; came when Hannity decided he had what it  	took to face off against filmaker Michael Moore&#8217;s facts&#8230;armed only with  	his usual assumptions and generalizations:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Saturday, we wrote about conservatives rejoicing over America&#8217;s loss (<em>regarding  	the Olympics</em>)&#8230;simply because it is also a loss for Obama.  We  	also mentioned that one conservative set aside partisanship and actually  	wrote a column thanking the President for trying to bring the Olympics (<em>and  	the resulting pride, revenues, and JOBS</em>) back to our country.  That  	conservative was talk show host, and former Republican legislator, Joe  	Scarborough.  So what can we expect when a conservative takes a &#8220;<em>time  	out</em>&#8221; to behave like a reasonable, patriotic American?  <strong>That&#8217;s  	right</strong>&#8230;Rush Limbaugh  has decided to pronounce Scarborough a &#8220;<strong>neutered  	chickified moderate.</strong>&#8220;  You have to appreciate that Scarborough,  	unlike so many other conservatives to face Rush&#8217;s wrath, did not back down:  	&#8220;<strong>I would be careful if I had put my testicles in a blind trust for George  	W. Bush for eight years.  So now, I guess what you do to prove that  	you&#8217;re a real conservative, because you weren&#8217;t a real conservative over the  	past eight years, you call the president names.</strong>&#8221; <em>Yowch</em>!</li>
<li>As one last item&#8230;let&#8217;s watch Stephen Colbert mock Glenn Beck&#8217;s  	breathless and weepy fearmongering, <em>as only Colbert can</em>&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OVAL OFFICE:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>President Obama&#8230;<a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html">has  	won the Nobel Peace Prize</a>.  For his work to advance nuclear  	disarmament, foster better relations with Muslim countries, and to encourage  	cooperation towards shared goals, Obama has been awarded the most  	prestigious peace award the international community can bestow.  The  	citation reads, in part, &#8220;<strong>Obama has as President created a new climate in  	international politics,&#8221; the citation read, in part. &#8220;Multilateral diplomacy  	has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United  	Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and  	negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most  	difficult international conflicts.</strong>&#8220;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obamas-nobel-prize-inspir_n_315167.html"> Two very interesting groups</a> have received this news with disgust and  	outrage: <em>American conservatives&#8230;and Taliban/Al Qaeda/Terrorist  	organizations</em>.  In fact&#8230;Rush Limbaugh went as far 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910090029">as to say</a>, &#8220;<strong>Our  	president is a worldwide joke. Folks, do you realize something has happened  	here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about and that is he  	doesn&#8217;t deserve the award. Now that&#8217;s hilarious, that I&#8217;m on the same side  	of something that the Taliban, and that we all are on the same side as the  	Taliban.</strong>&#8220;  Are you sure that&#8217;s what you really want to say,  	Rush&#8230;that you side with <strong>TERRORISTS</strong> against the <strong>PRESIDENT</strong>?   	Joe Scarborough and his guests 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obama-nobel-prize-a-disas_n_314997.html"> voiced a very different complaint</a>&#8230;that receiving an &#8220;<em>international  	award</em>&#8221; can <strong>ONLY</strong> be seen as a bad thing.  Scarborough said, &#8220;<strong>The  	upside is the Nobel Prize committee that has had suspect selections in the  	past has just befuddled a lot of people across the world</strong>,&#8221; and <em>Time</em>&#8216;s  	Mark Halperin added, &#8220;<strong>I predict right now that he will find a way to  	basically turn it down&#8230;I think he is going to say, I share this with the  	world or whatever. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll embrace this. Because there is no  	upside.</strong>&#8220;  Really?  The Nobel Peace Prize?  I  	mean&#8230;really?  You&#8217;re going to call receiving it a <strong>NEGATIVE</strong> event?</li>
<li><em>Saturday Night Live</em> chose to use its knack for scathing political  	satire to point out a more common complaint about President Obama&#8230;he just  	hasn&#8217;t done that much.  And given that we still have troops in Iraq and  	Afghanistan, Wall Street remains unregulated, 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091003/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_climate_bill_obama_7"> we&#8217;re told</a> not to expect Climate Change legislations, and they say that  	Obama 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/04/obama-to-take-on-dont-ask_n_309040.html"> will start to fight</a> for gay people&#8217;s civil liberties at the &#8220;<strong>right  	time</strong>&#8220;&#8230;it seems SNL may have a good point:</li>
</ul>
<p><object id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="384" height="283" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="384" height="283" src="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Health Care Reform has a new ally:  former Presidential candidate,  	and former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kansas).  Not only did  	Dole predict that the bill will be signed in 2010&#8230;<a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/20187">he  	explained exactly why</a> Republicans are opposing it: &#8220;<strong>Sometimes people  	fight you just to fight you.  They don&#8217;t want Reagan to get it, they  	don&#8217;t want Obama to get it, so we&#8217;ve got to kill it&#8230;Health care is one of  	those things.  Now we&#8217;ve got to do something.</strong>&#8220;  Dole warned,  	as other analysts have, that blind opposition to reform will, in the end,  	help the President politically and hurt the GOP.  As more distinguished  	GOP leaders from days past come forward and make these assertions&#8230;it seems  	to be having an impact, and there is some word that the GOP might be  	scrambling to find ways to both save face and vote for the bill.  	<a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/10/07/breaking-senate-gop-folding-over-health-care-reform/"> RedState.com&#8217;s Erick Erickson</a> reports,  &#8220;<strong>I am told quite reliably that in a meeting today on Capitol Hill,  		Republican Senators began to rapidly move toward concessions on health  		care because they are afraid they cannot hold their members. Some  		Republicans are now thinking of supporting a government program.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>There&#8217;s new life in the &#8220;<em>public option</em>&#8221; and some are calling it  	the &#8220;<em>opt-out public option</em>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/schumer-opt-out-public-op_n_313946.html"> Details are few</a>, but it appears that it would involve a government-run  	insurance plan&#8230;and states could choose not to allow it in their state.   	Democrats and several Republicans seem nominally on board with this, with  	two primary concerns:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>One</strong></span>&#8230;is it a &#8220;robust&#8221; version of  	the public option, or a watered down one.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Two</strong></span>&#8230;how many  	people will it truly help, if many states choose not to implement it?   	The first seems a valid concern, while the second does not.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Our  	prediction:</strong></span> If states choose <strong>NOT</strong> to allow their  	citizens the option to buy affordable public insurance in their state&#8230;it  	will be political suicide for those governors and legislators.  People  	will leave states that don&#8217;t offer it&#8230;and will vote out of office the  	people responsible for not allowing it to be purchased, particularly once  	word gets out that the people who <strong>DO</strong> purchase it in other states, are  	very pleased with it.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/cigna-employee-flips-off_n_314189.html"> Hilda and Krikor Sarkisyan</a> travelled with friends and supporters to the  	CIGNA headquarters in Philadelphia to speak to the CEO&#8230;and to complain  	that his company&#8217;s actions had <strong>KILLED THEIR DAUGHTER</strong>.  CIGNA had  	refused to pay for their daughter&#8217;s liver transplant because they said that  	the completely proven and established surgery was&#8230;wait for it&#8230;&#8221;<strong>too  	experimental</strong>.&#8221;  CIGNA eventually, following protests, changed its  	mind, but it was too late for Nataline Sarkisyan.  While there, several  	CIGNA employees on a balcony decided to show their support and sympathy for  	the Sarkisyans&#8230;by heckling them and making obscene gestures, and  	eventually the police were called to remove the Sarkisyans from the  	property.  CIGNA&#8217;s HR Director&#8217;s response: &#8220;<strong>I was very disappointed  	to learn of the behavior of one of our employees when you were at our  	company&#8217;s headquarters.  I sincerely regret this individual&#8217;s offensive  	and inappropriate action.  Please know that he did not represent the  	views of our company or the views of other employees who work here. We  	deeply empathize with you and wish you peace and comfort in your loss.</strong>&#8220;   	Sorry&#8230;I don&#8217;t think one smarmy letter from your company&#8217;s HR hack is going  	to smooth this one over.  To make matters worse, the Sarkisyan&#8217;s can&#8217;t  	take legal action:  A 1987 Supreme Court ruling <span style="text-decoration: underline;">shields CIGNA from  	lawsuit</span>.</li>
<li>Still haven&#8217;t seen Keith Olbermann&#8217;s special on Health Care Reform?  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/olbermanns-health-care-sp_n_313392.html"> See it here</a>.  <em>Seriously</em>, go watch it now&#8230;we&#8217;ll wait right  	here for you to come back.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Dick Cheney has been noticeably absent from the talk show circuit as of  	late&#8230;most likely because he is about to be under serious investigation  	regarding his part in the &#8220;Valerie Plame Scandal&#8221; and his part in  	authorizing torture, or perhaps because President Obama has now made 	<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/10/cheney-and-co-all-quiet-counterterrorism-front"> substantial gains in the area of counter-terrorism</a>.  Liz Cheney,  	after a few public debacles where defending her father&#8217;s ideology served  	only to make her appear insufficiently informed on all topics, has similarly  	been off the radar.  But that&#8217;s all ok&#8230;because there is still <strong>ANOTHER</strong> Cheney:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mary Cheney</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;The latest of the family to  	grab headlines is Dick Cheney&#8217;s lesbian daughter&#8230;who is now pregnant, and  	on the way towards having her second child with her partner, Heather Poe.   	Well, since Dick Cheney has come out supporting his daughter fully, and has  	switched to a &#8220;<em>pro-gay marriage</em>&#8221; stance, I&#8217;m sure that the rest of the  	conservative community will be totally fine with this.  What&#8217;s that?   	Oh&#8230;maybe not.  Here is just a sampling of the nauseating reactions 	<a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/mary_cheney_and_heather_poe_to_have_second_child_in_november_freepers_react/"> gathered from</a> the conservative site, the Free Republic, by Pam  	Spaulding:</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;<strong>I respect Dick Cheney, but I don&#8217;t understand why he is allowing his  daughter to take innocent children into her lesbianic home. Can anyone claim  that these kids won&#8217;t be scarred for life? So sad. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Also repugnant, IMNSHO, is the use of &#8216;they are expecting a child&#8217; when,  for obvious reasons &#8216;they&#8217; could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight  [sic] of hand that the left does with rediculous [sic] name reversals (like  &#8216;FAMILY PLANNING&#8217;) that implies something that in fact does just not happen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><strong>As much as I don&#8217;t like it, God will have to sort this out in the end.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Who is the father? Yes, you selfish lesbians, there is ALWAYS a father.  Not that the baby will benefit from one. sick.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this occasion? Yathink?  Congratulations on your baster bastard?</strong>&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>75 years ago, the Veterans of Foreign Wars erected a cross in the Mohave  	Desert, to commemorate soldiers who lost their lives in WWI.  The  	problem:  it&#8217;s federal land, and a former National Parks employee (<em>who,  	it should be noted, is a devout Catholic</em>) says that he has no problems with  	crosses&#8230;he just has a problem with a cross on public land.  Citing  	the Separation Of Church and State, this employee also points out that the  	memorial is clearly unfair to soldiers who were Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, or  	who practiced any faith (<em>or no faith</em>) other than Christianity.  It&#8217;s a  	good thing we have nine clear-headed Supreme Court Justices who can settle  	this easy dispute.  <strong>Or</strong>&#8230;.maybe there are only eight clear-headed  	Justices&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/scalia-defends-cross-on-p_n_313625.html">here&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia</a>: &#8220;<strong>It&#8217;s erected as a war memorial. I assume it is  	erected in honor of all of the war dead.  What would you have them  	erect?&#8230;Some conglomerate of a cross, a Star of David, and you know, a  	Muslim half moon and star?&#8230;I don&#8217;t think you can leap from that to the  	conclusion that the only war dead that that cross honors are the Christian  	war dead. I think that&#8217;s an outrageous conclusion.</strong>&#8220;  Yes&#8230;that&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia, who holds one of the highest positions in the land&#8230;saying  	that a cross <strong>REPRESENTS EVERYBODY</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope for a quiet weekend&#8230;some of these folks could use a little  &#8220;<em>quiet reflection time</em>.&#8221;  Until Monday&#8230;have a great one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow-up: Cheering Against Obama, The Olympics, And America</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/cheering-against-obama-and-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/cheering-against-obama-and-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Summer Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Prosperity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is rare that we do a Saturday post on the Reality Liberation Front...but there is something worthy of everyone's attention, and simply letting it fade into the next news cycle would be irresponsible.  Why would Americans be CHEERING for the Olympics NOT being held in America?  Why would a group called "Americans For Prosperity" be CHEERING for the loss of hundreds of thousands of new jobs, and BILLIONS of dollars in projected revenue?  And the BIG question:  Why would Americans CHEER for a president to fail...if it means America fails as well?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is rare that we do a Saturday post on the Reality Liberation Front&#8230;but  there is something worthy of everyone&#8217;s attention&#8230;and simply letting it fade  into the next news cycle would be irresponsible.</p>
<p>On Thursday, <a href="../bringing-home-the-2016-olympics-debunking-the-outrage/"> we wrote</a> of the outrage from conservatives and the right-wing media over  President Obama&#8217;s 18 hour trip to Copenhagen, Denmark&#8230;so that he could lobby  for the 2016 Summer Olympics to be held in Chicago, Illinois&#8230;</p>
<p>On Friday, <a href="../chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/"> we mentioned</a> in our regular &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition that Chicago lost  out in the first round of the IOC (International Olympic Committee) voting, and  that the Olympics would instead be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  We also  wrote that conservative commentators and bloggers were rejoicing that Obama had  failed in his attempt to bring the event to America&#8230;</p>
<p>And then&#8230;this clip was released on the internet:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="486" height="412" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="flashObj" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=43158474001&amp;playerId=1460906593&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1460906593" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="486" height="412" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1460906593" flashvars="videoId=43158474001&amp;playerId=1460906593&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" name="flashObj"></embed></object></p>
<p>First reaction to seeing this&#8230;<em>disgust</em>.  This is a gathering of  the so-called &#8220;<em>Americans For Prosperity</em>,&#8221; cheering at the announcement  that the Olympic games would not be held in America.  They obviously  believe that they are cheering because &#8220;<em>Obama failed</em>&#8220;&#8230;but without  realizing it, they are also cheering that:</p>
<p><strong>-  America&#8230;during a time of financial crisis&#8230;will NOT receive the  projected $22 billion dollars in revenue.</strong></p>
<p><strong>-  The 300,000 new jobs the Olympics would have created over the next  seven years, starting immediately&#8230;gone.</strong></p>
<p><strong>-  The $11 billion dollars in new income the jobs would have injected  into our system&#8230;gone.</strong></p>
<p>For them, as long as Obama &#8220;<em>fails</em>&#8220;&#8230;it is acceptable that people stay  unemployed&#8230;it is acceptable that those hundreds of thousands of people  continue to struggle and suffer, it is acceptable that the economy still  struggles&#8230;it is acceptable that another country&#8217;s prestige and economy  benefits, instead of <strong>OUR</strong> country.</p>
<p>Now expand this deeply calloused, and fundamentally flawed thinking to other  items on the national agenda&#8230;why is it that they are hoping that Obama fails  to reform health care&#8230;why is it that they are praying that he fails in  addressing problems in the Middle East&#8230;why is it that some of them seem to <em> hope</em> for a terrorist attack, in order to somehow prove Obama has made us &#8220;<em>less  safe</em>&#8220;&#8230;why is it that they openly admit that they hope Obama stumbles in  attempting to resurrect the economy?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s simple:</span> as long as  Obama fails, for these people, they are indifferent to the loss of American  life, American jobs, and American safety and security.</p>
<p>And then, as if to say &#8220;<em>we are not all like that</em>,&#8221; morning show host  and former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough wrote the following <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-scarborough/thank-you-mr-president_b_308022.html"> in his column</a> on <em>The Huffington Post</em> titled &#8220;<em>Thank You, Mr. President,</em>&#8221; which I offer here  in its entirety:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;">&#8220;<strong>Count me as one conservative  who is disappointed that President Obama&#8217;s hometown will not be hosting the 2016  Olympic Games. </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Chicago is a beautiful city  that would have made a perfect backdrop for the Olympics. The President was  right to fly to Copenhagen to try to land the games, not for the sake of his  city, but for the good of his country. The fact President Obama failed makes me  respect him more for taking the chance, and the fact many right-wing figures  opposed the President&#8217;s mission shows just how narrow-minded partisanship makes  us all.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>For the better part of 20  years, a bitterness has infected our politics that has weakened our country.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>We Republicans spent eight  years trying to delegitimize Bill Clinton.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Democrats spent the next eight  years doing the same to George W. Bush.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Now that a Democrat is in the  Oval Office again, it is the GOP who is trying to delegitimize a sitting  president.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>When I try to talk to  Republicans about the need to break this cycle of viciousness, some cite the  chapter and verse of every hateful left wing attack against George W. Bush.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Whenever I attempt to have a  conversation with some Democrats about the need for us respect our president&#8211;  whether he be an Obama or a Bush&#8211; I am told that Bush deserved whatever he got  because he was a lying war criminal who hated the Constitution and loved  torturing people.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Fortunately, there are a  growing number of Americans who believe we cannot continue going on this way.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>You and I may disagree on how  the CIA handled terror suspects. But that does not mean that you are soft on  terrorism anymore than it means that I hate the Constitution.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>You and I may have a different  approach to Afghanistan. But just because you want to stay there another five  years doesn&#8217;t mean you are an imperialist. And if I believe a decade in that  forsaken land is more than enough, that doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m soft on al Qaeda or the  Taliban.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>It just means that we view the  world differently.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>That creative tension&#8211;that  intense give and take&#8211;has been what has kept America strong since Thomas  Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton fought like hell in George Washington&#8217;s White  House.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Hamilton wanted a strong  centralized government while Jefferson believed that the government that  governed least governed best.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Both men were frustrated by  the checks and balances that stood in the way of their agendas, but that debate  shaped America for years to come.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>But something has gone  terribly wrong.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Today on Morning Joe, NBC News  Legend Tom Brokaw remarked to Pat Buchanan about how the level of partisanship  is even more intense today than during the depths of the Watergate crisis.  Brokaw was commenting on Congressman Grayson&#8217;s comments, but he could have  easily been talking about Joe Wilson or death panels or the bizarre claim that  the President &#8220;hates all white people.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Some of the rhetoric is  dangerous. But what we saw from some conservative corners regarding the  President&#8217;s failed Olympics bid was just plain stupid.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>I&#8217;m happy for Rio and think it  is past time that South America got a chance to host the Olympic Games. But put  me down as one conservative who is glad my president flew across the ocean to  try to bring the 2016 Games to America.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Nice try, President Obama. And  thanks for taking time away from your young girls for the sake of your hometown  and your country, Michelle. I know that&#8217;s never an easy thing to do.</strong>&#8220;</p>
<p>Good for you, Joe.  And he&#8217;s right:  I, myself, am at times guilty  of ascribing the most depraved qualities to those I disagree with&#8230;when really  all that exists is a difference of opinion and/or perspective.  But  Joe&#8230;when people cheer for America&#8217;s loss, simply because it is also Obama&#8217;s  loss&#8230;what attributes am I supposed to ascribe to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/cheering-against-obama-and-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition:  Kung-fu, Glenn Beck, And A $10 Fee</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-kung-fu-glenn-beck-and-a-10-fee/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-kung-fu-glenn-beck-and-a-10-fee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honor roll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rise To The Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value Voters Summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we are, back on track, having successfully caught up in the last few days, whittling down our mountain of bookmarked news items.  So...as per the usual RLF tradition, it is time for our "Chaos Theory Edition" where we wrap up all of the remaining interesting and bizarre developments in American news, policy, and culture...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we are, back on track, having successfully caught up in the last few  days, whittling down our mountain of bookmarked news items.  So&#8230;as per  the usual RLF tradition, it is time for our &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; where  we wrap up all of the remaining interesting and bizarre developments in American  news, policy, and culture&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>During the Bush administration, both the press and public frequently  	complained about the lack of transparency in the White House, the lack of  	availability of the president to meet with the press, and refusal of the  	president or the press secretary to provide answers to questions.  Now  	that we have a president who is willing to FULLY answer questions, and who  	has made the actions of our government more transparent&#8230;these same people  	gripe that he is &#8220;<strong>over-exposed.</strong>&#8220;  This hypocrisy was not lost on  	Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:248969" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:248969" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>It is nice to see that even conservative pundits and politicians are  	starting to denounce false and inflammatory rhetoric, such as is regular  	seen on Glenn Beck&#8217;s show on any given day.  <em>Morning Jo</em>e host  	and former Republican Congressman, Joe Scarborough not only publicly  	reprimanded Beck for his &#8220;<strong>hateful</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>racist</strong>&#8221; words&#8230;but  	also says he is creating an &#8220;<strong>honor roll</strong>&#8221; of like-minded conservatives  	who want to call an end to violent and incendiary tactics.  <strong>THAT</strong>&#8230;would  	indeed be very honorable.  Here&#8217;s a clip from <em>Morning Joe</em> on the  	subject:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5woLGnwN2I4&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5woLGnwN2I4&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5woLGnwN2I4">www.youtube.com/watch?v=5woLGnwN2I4</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Speaking of Beck&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200909230042">in  	an except from his book</a>, where he is attempting to explain to the rest  	of us what the founding fathers intended, he refers to a little-known  	passage in the Constitution:  &#8220;<em>Section 9. The Migration or  	Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think  	proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year  	one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on  	such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.&#8221; </em> Beck  	responds, &#8220;<strong>That&#8217;s right, the Founders actually put a price tag on coming  	to this country: $10 per person. Apparently they felt like there was a value  	to being able to live here. Not anymore. These days we can&#8217;t ask <em> anything</em> of immigrants.</strong>&#8220;  Of course, what Beck fails to  	realize is the the &#8220;<em>$10</em>&#8221; wasn&#8217;t some fee that immigrants paid to  	enter the country because they saw the &#8220;<strong>value to being able to live here</strong>&#8220;&#8230;this  	passage refers to the $10 tax that could be levied on <strong>EACH SLAVE</strong> forcibly brought into this country, who weren&#8217;t so freaking thrilled to be  	here at all.  This section was designed&#8230;to prevent slavery from being  	outlawed, and to simultaneously allow the government to collect a tax on  	slaves.  So much for Glenn &#8220;<em>Constitutional Expert</em>&#8221; Beck&#8230;</li>
<li>Using his own, unique brand of satire&#8230;Stephen Colbert presented his  	suggestion for conservative firebrands who want to make racially-insinuative  	attacks against Obama, but don&#8217;t want to be identified as racists:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250386" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250386" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Rush Limbaugh must be feeling a little unloved, what with Glenn Beck  	surpassing him in the ratings game.  So, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/24/rush-limbaugh-jay-leno-sh_n_299190.html"> in a recent interview with Jay Leno</a>, Rush reminded all of us why he  	should still be the preferred choice among people without functioning  	brainstems.  First&#8230;he said that because everybody who listens to his  	show agrees with him&#8230;he is &#8220;<strong>not controversial at all,</strong>&#8221; and that, <strong> THEREFORE</strong>, it is Obama who is &#8220;<strong>polarizing</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>dividing this  	country right now.</strong>&#8220;  Then showing the power of faulty logic when  	used <strong>WITH</strong> a disregard for real-world data, Limbaugh said regarding  	the economy and the gigantic profits Wall Street CEOs make by defrauding  	investors, &#8220;<strong>The market will fix itself.  It&#8217;s none of my business  	what they make, Jay, it&#8217;s certainly none of yours, and it&#8217;s certainly not  	Barack Obama&#8217;s what anybody makes&#8230;If you believe in the capitalist system,  	you have to erase from your whole worldview what somebody needs</strong>.&#8221;   	Thus, simply stated, we are presented with the far right&#8217;s philosophy:   	the free market will always take care of itself, and this is good as long as  	we don&#8217;t care about what anybody needs.</li>
<li>Bill O&#8217;Reilly recently claimed on his show the standard right-wing  	position regarding racism:  it&#8217;s only a few of the protesters&#8230;the  	left has racists, too&#8230;only 10% of Americans are racists.  To no one&#8217;s  	surprise, Dr. Jeremy Levitt, law professor at Florida A&amp;M and an  	African-American&#8230;had a small problem with this.  Ok, conservatives  	here&#8217;s the simplest I can say it:  you don&#8217;t have to run around calling  	everyone the &#8220;<em>n-word</em>&#8221; to be a racist.  If you lock the car door  	when you see a black person walking by&#8230;if you wouldn&#8217;t want a member of  	another race dating your son or daughter&#8230;if you would resent having to  	answer to a superior at work who is the member of another race&#8230;if instead  	of attacking the president&#8217;s policies, you resort to calling him a &#8220;<em>Nazi</em>,&#8221;  	a &#8220;<em>Kenyan</em>,&#8221; or make a monkey joke&#8230;then you <strong>TOO</strong> suffer from  	very common, racial prejudice.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m6sOkGZtc6Y&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m6sOkGZtc6Y&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6sOkGZtc6Y">www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6sOkGZtc6Y</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PRESIDENT OBAMA -- GHOSTS OF OUR PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The Obama administration has decided not to pursue a new law to change  	our policies regarding detainees.  No&#8230;they will keep using the 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/23/AR2009092304427.html?hpid=topnews"> 2001 congressional resolution</a> allowing for the indefinite detention of  	prisoners.  If you start by acknowledging that, <em>by law</em>, American  	military bases, prisons, and ships are considered &#8220;<em>American soil</em>,&#8221;  	then the equation is very simple:  American soil <strong>PLUS</strong> prisoners 	<strong>MINUS</strong> habeas corpus <strong>MINUS</strong> due process <strong>EQUALS</strong> unconstitutional.  President Obama&#8230;that, sir, is neither change nor  	progress.</li>
<li>Obama has a &#8220;<em>new</em>&#8221; educational policy complete with a fancy new  	name: &#8220;<strong>Race To The Top</strong>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/24/AR2009092403197.html"> It&#8217;s too bad</a> that it is nearly identical to the dismal &#8220;<strong>No Child Left  	Behind</strong>&#8221; policy of his predecessor&#8230;so close, in fact, that both  	Democrats and Teachers&#8217; Unions are calling it &#8220;<strong>BUSH III</strong>.&#8221;  More  	standardized tests&#8230;yadda yadda yadda&#8230;teacher accountability&#8230;yadda  	yadda&#8230;performance pay&#8230;.blah blah blah&#8230;charter schools.  I&#8217;ve said  	this before:  standardized tests do little to improve or accurately  	gauge learning, teachers are plenty accountable, performance pay is the  	impractical, impossible to implement equivalent of an &#8220;educational unicorn,&#8221;  	and charter schools only serve to placate &#8220;<em>free market</em>&#8221; zealots.   	The problems&#8230;in all schools&#8230;are centered squarely in one place: <strong>the  	administration</strong>.  Principals with no business experience, no  	leadership skills, no interest in promoting learning, and no backbones&#8230;<strong>THAT&#8217;S</strong> the heart of the problem.</li>
<li>I have stated before that conservatives should be less concerned with  	what Obama is &#8220;<em>changing</em>&#8220;&#8230;and more concerned with the Bush policies  	and practices that he is &#8220;<em>retaining</em>.&#8221;  Garry Willis&#8217; piece,  	Entangled Giant, <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/23110?email"> describes aptly</a> the history of accumulation of power within the  	Executive Branch&#8230;and just how hard it is to reverse the trend.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>AMERICAN CONSPIRACIES -- OUTRAGE WITHOUT PURPOSE:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Just for fun:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/21/the-funniest-protest-sign_n_292342.html?slidenumber=8#slide_image"> here is a collection</a> of some of the funniest protest signs spotted  	recently&#8230;misspelled words , flagrant ignorance, wild theories&#8230;it&#8217;s all  	there.</li>
<li>Thomas Quigley Jr. 	<a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/09/23/Kung_Fu_Black_Belt_Sues_Democrats.htm"> is suing the Democratic National Committee</a>&#8230;for throwing him out of a  	town hall.  During the meeting held by Representative Steve Driehaus  	(D-Ohio), Quigley repeatedly interrupted the panel of speakers, and when  	approached by the security guards about his disruptions&#8230;he told them he  	was &#8220;<strong>a black belt in kung-fu and would respond if attacked.</strong>&#8220;   	Apparently, his kung-fu training was no match for the guards, and he was  	bodily removed from the meeting.  Oh, and Quigley&#8230;is a licensed  	insurance agent.</li>
<li>I wrote earlier in the week of how the &#8220;<em>Values Voters Summit</em>&#8221;  	appeared to be devoid of both actual values <span style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> reason.  But  	once again, Jon Stewart said it better:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:248971" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:248971" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Former teen heartthrob, later drug addict, later born-again Christian  	Kirk Cameron 	<a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20307814,00.html">would  	like to share</a> with you (<em>in an interview with People Magazine</em>)  	some fairly interesting views on evolution: &#8220;<strong>Atheism has been on the rise  	for years now, and the Bible of the atheists is <em>The Origin of Species</em>.   	We have a situation in our country where young people are entering college  	with a belief in God and exiting with that faith being stripped and  	shredded. What we want to do is have student make an informed, educated  	decision before they chuck their faith.</strong>&#8220;  He and his group are  	currently disseminating edited versions of Darwin&#8217;s theory&#8230;complete with  	their own criticisms in which they compare it Hitler&#8217;s eugenics program, and  	declare the theory misogynistic because of sexist statements attributed to  	Darwin.  For the record&#8230;in science the word &#8220;<em>theory</em>&#8221; does not  	mean the same thing as it does in common parlance.  When we say &#8220;<em>theory</em>,&#8221;  	we are referring to an idea that has not been proven.  When scientists  	refer to a &#8220;<em>theory</em>&#8221; they are referring to a scientific position  	supported by a wealth of studies and research that holds up to the very  	strongest scientific scrutiny.  Now, it is true that evolution is not a  	scientific &#8220;<em>law</em>&#8221; (<em>meaning that in it&#8217;s entirety it is deemed  	impossible to disprove</em>)&#8230;but it is far closer to a &#8220;<em>law</em>&#8221; than it  	is to a simple &#8220;<em>hypothesis</em>&#8221; which is a premise lacking  	substantiation.  It is a continued embarrassment, that fewer Americans  	accept evolution than the people of <strong>ANY OTHER</strong> civilized country&#8230;and  	that the new movie on Darwin&#8217;s life can&#8217;t even find an American distributer  	because most distribution companies worry that &#8220;<em>Americans just aren&#8217;t  	ready for it.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>Recently, Bill O&#8217;Reilly, in a conversation with Barney Frank on the  	subject of the undercover investigation of ACORN offices, said that nobody  	cares if the documentarians broke the Maryland laws regarding illegal  	wiretapping.  Barney Frank&#8230;disagreed: &#8220;<strong>I&#8217;m sorry, what an  	outrageous statement. What an outrageous statement for you to make: nobody  	cares about the Maryland wiretap law. I do care about the law. I&#8217;m an  	elected official.</strong>&#8220;  In response&#8230;O&#8217;Reilly called Frank, &#8220;<strong>eccentric</strong>.&#8221;   	Really, Bill?  Is it now eccentric to believe that the law of land  	should be obeyed?  This represents the all-too-common position among  	conservatives that the end justifies the means, that violating the law is  	acceptable as long as it was done for a good reason.  It&#8217;s a concept <strong> MOST</strong> un-American.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cUHCtnpTVpg&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cUHCtnpTVpg&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUHCtnpTVpg">www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUHCtnpTVpg</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Above, we talked some of Glenn Beck&#8217;s conspiracy-based ranting&#8230;it  	takes a group like the SNL cast to really do it justice:</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="320" height="260" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=200909240036" /><param name="src" value="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" height="260" src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=200909240036"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>By now you&#8217;ve heard of the census taker&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/25/census-worker-killed-by-a_n_299725.html">senselessly  	murdered</a>, found hanged with the word &#8220;<em>Fed</em>&#8221; written on his chest.   	It seems to validate House Speaker Pelosi&#8217;s fears that the violent  	anti-government rhetoric might lead to actual violence&#8230;as history has  	shown that it often does.  Now&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27566.html">experts  	seem to be agreeing</a> with her.  If you want to understand how this  	situation is created&#8230;visit 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/25/crazy-census-conspiracies_n_299830.html"> this list</a> of the top census conspiracy theories.  Internment  	camps&#8230;taking your property&#8230;brainwashing children.  Now imagine a  	right wing extremist&#8230;hearing a member of Congress, or a &#8220;<em>news</em>&#8221;  	personality, or some other figure they respect and trust&#8230;telling them  	these things&#8230;telling them they have to &#8220;<em>act now</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>preserve  	their country</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>be a patriot</em>.&#8221;  And <strong>THAT&#8217;S</strong> how it  	happens&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HEALTH CARE -- CARNIVAL OF DELAY AND DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Two words are being most commonly associated with the current state of  	the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s Health Care Reform legislation:  &#8220;<strong>delay</strong>&#8221;  	and &#8220;<strong>fight</strong>.&#8221;  Sometimes&#8230;the words are appearing in the same  	sentence, as is the case with the recent confrontation between Senator Kyl  	of Arizona, and committee chairman Senator Baucus of Montana.  <em>The  	short version:</em> Kyl insisted on repeating himself, restating  	examples he&#8217;d previously given, and remaking arguments he&#8217;d already  	made&#8230;Baucus, grew tired of the obvious stalling tactic:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4y80G63ARBM&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4y80G63ARBM&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y80G63ARBM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y80G63ARBM</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Another fight:</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/23/dog-fight-dueling-whip-co_n_297207.html"> whip counts</a>.  Liberal Democrats in the House are busy trying to  	wrangle every possible vote, while Blue Dog Democrats do the same exact  	thing.  Current trend&#8230;Blue Dogs beginning to sway in favor of voting  	&#8220;<em>yea</em>&#8221; on the House bill.  Perhaps they&#8217;ve been actually paying  	attention to the polls&#8230;the latest shows that 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2009/09/25/us/politics/25pollgrx.html"> 65% of Americans</a> still support the inclusion of the public option&#8230;even  	more support it when it has been explained to them.  <em>Again,  	conservatives:</em> this is a democracy&#8230;you may not support it&#8230;.the  	people in your conservative-leaning community may not support it&#8230;the  	people in your conservative-leaning workplace may also not support it&#8230;and  	all of these people may scream their objections loud as hell.  <strong>BUT</strong>&#8230;the  	majority of Americans <strong>DO</strong> support it&#8230;and in a democracy&#8230;majority  	rules.</li>
<li>The Humana Fracas:  Medicare laws say that providers of Medicare  	Advantage plans (<em>like Humana</em>) <strong>MAY NOT</strong> use taxpayer-subsidized  	mailings to push their political agendas.  Humana&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">did just that</span>.   	The board that oversees Medicare/Medicaid is investigating.   	Republicans&#8230;you guessed it: are calling this &#8220;<em>stifling the free speech</em>&#8221;  	of their good friends, the insurance industry.  And now, the GOP 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/24/gop-to-block-obama-health_n_298663.html"> is threatening to block</a> Obama&#8217;s nominations to key Health and Human  	Services posts&#8230;unless Obama and Sibelius allow Humana and other insurance  	companies <strong>TO BREAK THE LAW</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>That brings this week to a close&#8230;enjoy the weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you back  here on Monday for more of the latest developments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-kung-fu-glenn-beck-and-a-10-fee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
