<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Liz Cheney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/liz-cheney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Terror Suspects To NY Trial, IL Prison &#8211; GOP Fails To Generate Fear</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/terror-suspects-to-ny-trial-il-prison-gop-fearmongering/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/terror-suspects-to-ny-trial-il-prison-gop-fearmongering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fearmongering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Representative Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Representative Manzullo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Representative Sacia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ashcroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khalid Sheikh Mohammed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson Prison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people have been asking the same question over the last year:  "Is there a point where Americans will no longer accept terrorism-based scaremongering tactics?"  The answer has arrived: "Yes...and that time is now." We take a look at two current news items:  AG Holder's announcement that 9/11 plotters will go to trial in New York...and Gitmo prisoners might be coming to Thompson, Illinois.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have been asking the same question over the last year:  &#8220;<strong>Is  there a point where Americans will no longer accept terrorism-based  scaremongering tactics?</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>The answer has arrived: &#8220;<strong>Yes&#8230;and that time is <em>now</em>.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>Recently, there has been considerable news coverage of two stories.  Two  stories, that actually represent the very same issue:</p>
<p><strong>1 -</strong> Attorney General Holder&#8217;s announcement that the masterminds behind  the 9/11 attacks would be tried in a federal court in New York.</p>
<p><strong>2 -</strong> The announcement that a prison in Thompson, Illinois might be used  to house Guantanamo Bay&#8217;s detainees.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start by taking a look at each of these issues independently:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>New York Terror Trial:</strong></span></p>
<p>One can easily predict the response to <strong>BOTH</strong> these items from the  conservative camp.  Conservative pundits and politicians have made the  standard &#8220;<em>not-in-my-backyard</em>&#8221; argument, asking their viewers and  supporters, &#8220;<em>Do you really want these terrorists brought to the U.S.?</em>&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>Former New York Mayor Giuliani 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-collins/giuliani-the-brave_b_360408.html"> proclaimed</a> that the wounds in New York are still too fresh for the city  	to withstand the &#8220;<em>psychic pain</em>&#8221; of a locally held trial.  News  	flash, Mr. Giuliani&#8230;you can&#8217;t one minute tell us how strong New Yorkers  	are, and then tell us the next minute that they are &#8220;<em>too fragile</em>&#8221; to  	endure trials of the terrorists who attacked them.  <strong>The <em>former</em> is true:</strong> New Yorkers have shown themselves to be remarkably  	resilient, and there are few psychologists who <strong>WOULDN&#8217;T</strong> agree that a  	trial would be a further step in the healing process.  When people are  	attacked, it is of fundamental benefit to be able to &#8220;<em>face</em>&#8221; their  	assailants, and to see the assailants brought to justice.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Side  	note:</strong></span> Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) also opposes the trial,  	calling it &#8220;<strong>unprecedented</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>indefensible</strong>&#8220;&#8230;strangely,  	both Sessions and Guiliani had 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/18/sessions-giuliani-backed_n_362479.html"> no problem</a> eight years ago with Zacarias Moussaoui (<em>the so-called  	20th hijacker</em>) being tried in the U.S.</li>
<li>Former Attorney General Ashcroft says that a trial in a civilian court,  	rather than a military commission, would be too &#8220;<em>transparent</em>.&#8221;   	Too transparent?  Is there such a thing when it comes to the American  	government and our national ideals?  <strong>No</strong>.  The absence of  	transparency brought us unjust investigation methods, unjust arrests, unjust  	detentions, and unjust treatment of prisoners.  There is only one way  	to get that particular train back on the tracks, and that is to apply the  	two hundred year-old, Constitutionally mandated, Due Process of Law.   	That means courts&#8230;it means evidence&#8230;and it means a jury gets to weigh  	that evidence and determine guilt or innocence.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Period</span>.</li>
<li>Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/18/grassley-to-holder-rememb_n_362125.html"> said that all we need to do</a>&#8230;is to remember what happened in the O.J.  	Simpson trial and ask ourselves, &#8220;<em>Do we really want that to happen again.</em>&#8221;  	Really?  Is this perhaps the most inane thing we have ever heard from  	Chuck Grassley?  If anything hindered the O.J. trial&#8230;it was the fact  	that he is, to some, a beloved football/movie celebrity.  But Khalid  	Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9/11 plotters?  Does Grassley really  	think that a jury is going to wrongly acquit them because they are &#8220;<em>esteemed  	celebrities?</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) told Holder that since Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has  	asked to confess his guilt to a military commission and be executed&#8230;that  	is what we should do.  AG Holder rightly pointed out to Kyl: we aren&#8217;t  	going to do what the <strong>TERRORIST</strong> wants to do&#8230;we are going to follow  	the American legal process.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nOVN3iWu9vM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nOVN3iWu9vM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOVN3iWu9vM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOVN3iWu9vM</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Karl Rove, Liz Cheney, Newt Gingrich, and Bill Kristol tried desperately  	to mobilize an angry mob to appear the day of the hearings, where Eric  	Holder would be explaining his decision to a Senate committee.  The  	effect of their scare tactics, utilizing the full force of the airwaves and  	the internet?  	<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/11/rove-cheney-gingrich-and-kristol-fail-rally-911-trial-foes"> Crickets</a>&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s really quite simple:  These men participated in murdering thousands  of people in New York.  We have an established process for handling this.   We are very proud of our process for handling this.  The absolute  dedication to the application of the Due Process of Law is one thing that is  truly American, and encompasses all aspects in our belief in fairness,  justice&#8230;and the necessity for fairness and justice being decided <strong>BY THE  PEOPLE</strong>.  In the New York federal court&#8230;the defendants will appear,  and be represented by counsel.  The prosecutor, will represent the <strong> PEOPLE</strong>.  The jury, will represent the <strong>JUDGMENT OF THE PEOPLE</strong>.   What&#8217;s more&#8230;the process itself validates and establishes <strong>WHO WE ARE</strong> as  a people each time it is successfully conducted, and also serves as a point of  closure and healing for victims.  Much more so than some shadowy, closed,  military tribunal down in Cuba.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Relocation of Gitmo Prisoners to Thompson, Illinois:</strong></span></p>
<p>Thompson, Illinois has a prison.  An expensive, new&#8230;and <strong>EMPTY</strong> supermax facility.  Built during the boom times&#8230;when bust times came, it  was not practical to staff the prison, so only the minimum security section is  used, and for only a small number of prisoners.  The governor of Illinois  loves the idea of the prison&#8217;s super-maximum section being used to house  detainees from Guantanamo Bay.  The state&#8217;s two senators also strongly  support the idea.  The citizens of Thompson, a city experiencing very hard  economic times, love the 3000 jobs and over a billion dollars that the opening  of the super-maximum prison would create.  So what could possibly <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/14/thomson-prison-in-illinoi_n_358069.html"> be the problem</a>?</p>
<ul>
<li>Illinois Republican Representative Mark Kirk has been holding press  	conferences and circulating calls for support&#8230;saying that bringing the  	detainees to Illinois would make Illinois and its landmarks the new number  	one target for terrorists, specifically the Sears Tower, as it is America&#8217;s  	tallest building.  Kirk also warns that, if the Board of Corrections  	has authority over these prisoners, they will receive visitors&#8230;and he says  	that people would then have to be afraid of terrorists flying through O&#8217;Hare  	airport to come see their incarcerated friends.  <em>Ummm&#8230;Kirk</em>?   	The Defense Department would be buying the prison <strong>FROM</strong> the Board of  	Corrections&#8230;and has already said it would not allow the detainees any  	visitors.  Try doing a little bit of research first, before diving  	headlong into scare tactics&#8230;</li>
<li>Illinois Republican Don Manzullo, who is actually <strong>SUPPOSED</strong> to be  	representing the good people of Thompson (<em>who, again, want the prison to  	open</em>), warns that the terrorists will be brought here and then released  	into the Illinois community.</li>
</ul>
<p>Editorial boards across the country immediately <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/18/editorial-boards-slam-gop_n_362085.html"> criticized</a> this use of fearmongering, and set about stating the easy  counter-arguments to the GOP representatives&#8217; claims.  One of the best  columns, by <em>Sun-Times</em> columnist Neil Steinberg, makes some of the  clearest points:  <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/steinberg/1889631,CST-NWS-stein18.article"> Here&#8217;s his column</a>.  I&#8217;ll summarize, thusly: First of all, there are  already Al Qaeda terrorists being held in Illinois&#8230;27 of them&#8230;it hasn&#8217;t  caused Al Qaeda to &#8220;<em>zero in</em>&#8221; on Illinois yet, so what&#8217;s 200 more?   Secondly, history proves that trying to avoid doing anything to provoke &#8220;agents  of evil&#8221;&#8230;doesn&#8217;t really work (<em>it&#8217;s called &#8220;appeasement&#8221; and you Republicans  claim to be against it</em>).  Third, being home to the tallest building in  the U.S., doesn&#8217;t really mean anything&#8230;when terrorists have shown interest in  military bases, trains and subways, shopping malls, government buildings, and a  multitude of other targets.  But it turns out, the columnists were not the  only people who thought the senseless fearmongering had gone too far;  Some  Republicans and conservatives are fed up with it as well:</p>
<ul>
<li>A statement was released by the Constitution Project, David Keene,  	founder of American Conservative Union, Grover Norquist, president of  	Americans for Tax Reform, and former representative and presidential  	candidate Bob Barr&#8230;saying that the housing of Gitmo detainees in Thompson,  	Illinois&#8230;&#8221;<strong>makes good sense.</strong>&#8220;  They didn&#8217;t stop there, and went  	as far as to say, &#8220;<strong>The scaremongering about these issues should  	stop&#8230;[there is] absolutely no reason to fear that prisoners will escape or  	be released into their communities.</strong>&#8220;  You can read the rest of the  	statement 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/16/conservative-trio-support_n_358928.html"> here</a>.</li>
<li>Illinois Republican Representative Jim Sacia 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/17/illinois-republican-we-wo_n_361114.html"> was even more direct</a>, saying that legislators (<em>including his GOP  	brethren</em>) who oppose the measure to move the detainees to Thompson&#8230;are  	&#8220;<strong>idiots</strong>.&#8221;  Sacia said, &#8220;<strong>My thinking on this is extremely  	positive.  If we lose this opportunity. All I can think of is we  	literally are idiots. I mean that sincerely&#8230;I understand I&#8217;m on different  	pages of music with others in my party. First of all this should not be a  	partisan issue in any way. If President Obama brings the detainees on U.S.  	soil and we sit here with a brand new state-of-the-art, max security prison,  	sitting vacant for the last eight years, and pass on an opportunity to sell  	it to the federal government, which we would fill it with 1,500 regular  	prisoners and 800 detainees, what is the problem? The building was designed  	to do that.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p>So, perhaps that&#8217;s &#8220;<em>it</em>.&#8221;  Perhaps Americans, even conservative  Americans, are not willing to accept arguments the consist of nothing more than  &#8220;<em>If we do [insert action here] the terrorists will kill you.</em>&#8220;   Perhaps Americans are no longer willing to set aside Constitutional rights and  the guarantee of Due Process&#8230;just in the sake of &#8220;<em>perceived safety</em>.&#8221;   Perhaps Americans think jobs and revenue are more important right now than  slippery slope arguments regarding what the terrorists &#8220;<em>might</em>&#8221; do.   And perhaps&#8230;just maybe&#8230;because Americans are no longer willing to be scared  into supporting GOP positions&#8230;the GOP is realizing that they have to make a  better argument.  <em>Just perhaps&#8230; </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/terror-suspects-to-ny-trial-il-prison-gop-fearmongering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Waterboarding Grandkids, Possum Meat, Nazi Golfers</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Castellanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Values Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Ratigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keep American Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcia Greenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF's weekly "Chaos Theory Edition" where we wrap up the remaining strange news items from the week.  Only four categories this week, but lots of links and clips.  Let's get started...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF&#8217;s  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; where we wrap up the remaining strange news  items from the week.</p>
<p>Only four categories this week&#8230;but lots of links, so <em>let&#8217;s get started</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>We&#8217;ve all been witness to the GOP&#8217;s recent &#8220;<em>enlightenment</em>&#8221;  	regarding the nation&#8217;s debt.  For the last eight years, while they held  	the reins of Congress, the rampant government spending was &#8220;<em>absolutely  	necessary</em>.&#8221;  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now:</span></strong> It&#8217;s the equivalent of kicking our  	grandchildren in the teeth.  Or, as Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma)  	recently put it, it&#8217;s the equivalent of &#8220;<strong>waterboarding</strong>&#8221; them.  	<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62973-its-coburn-vs-krugman-on-spending"> Coburn said</a>, &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;re going to waterboard them.  We&#8217;re going to  	flood them with debt.</strong>&#8220;  Senator Coburn was referring to a program  	funding the study of political science, which 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/08/coburn-political-science/"> Coburn claims is not necessary</a>&#8230;since people can learn all that  	they need to know about politics from <strong>CABLE NEWS</strong>.  It&#8217;s suddenly  	quite obvious where <strong>HE</strong> learned most of what <strong>HE</strong> knows  	about it&#8230;</li>
<li>It&#8217;s an established fact that Republicans have had some difficulty  	adjusting to the &#8220;<em>internet age</em>&#8220;&#8230;perhaps best displayed by the fact  	that most of them don&#8217;t seem to realize that if they say something that  	directly contradicts what they said one year ago, the clip of both  	statements will be on <em>YouTube</em> before the day is out.  Want to  	see a slideshow of the &#8220;<em>Top Nine Republican Internet Fails</em>?&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/republican-internet-fails_n_319574.html"> Here you go</a>&#8230;</li>
<li>The number one problem with allying oneself with a minority of loud,  	activist, ignorant, and unreasonable people&#8230;is that you suddenly lose the  	support of the much larger body of normal, moderate, sane folks.  Want  	to see what happens if you try to win the moderate people back by behaving  	like a reasonable human being, open to compromise and the good ideas of  	others?  Watch here as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) finds out what  	happens when the lunatics figure out that you are not really one of them:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Liz Cheney is not quite done fighting her father&#8217;s battles&#8230;no matter  	how many times she appears on discussion panels and is identified as having  	the foreign policy knowledge of a teenager.  Now 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28212.html">she has  	formed</a> the &#8220;<em>Keep America Safe</em>&#8221; organization, whose mission  	statement claims to support &#8220;<strong>an unapologetic approach to fighting  	terrorism around the world, for victory in the wars this country fights, for  	democracy and human rights, and for a strong American military that is  	needed in the dangerous world in which we live.</strong>&#8220;  Ms.  	Cheney&#8230;first of all, even if we look only at the fact that planes have not  	crashed into buildings this year, President Obama <strong>ALREADY</strong> has a  	better track record than your father had, in terms of keeping the country  	safe.  Secondly, Obama has succeeded in gaining international allies  	in the struggle against terrorists&#8230;allies that your father helped to  	alienate.  And third, well, I think the DNC put it best in their  	response: &#8220;<strong>Last fall, the American people overwhelmingly rejected a  	radical foreign policy authored by Dick Cheney that alienated our allies,  	emboldened our enemies, depleted our resources, distracted our focus and  	made the nation less secure. The Cheneys lost that debate and their approach  	was deemed a failure. The Cheneys can continue to focus on securing their  	sullied legacy if they want to. But, the President will continue to focus on  	securing the country.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Exactly</em>.</li>
<li>Retaining his crown as &#8220;<em>King of the Bizarre Analogy</em>,&#8221; RNC  	Chariman Michael Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/michael-steele-cow-on-the_n_321121.html"> said in a recent FOX interview</a> that he feels like&#8230;well&#8230;health care  	reform is a &#8220;<strong>train</strong>,&#8221; and President Obama is the conductor, and Obama  	is trying to get all the Republicans to get on board, and Steele sees  	himself as a &#8220;<strong>cow on the tracks.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Ok, sure.</em></li>
<li>I mentioned in a previous post, one way that you know that the GOP is  	focused on simply <strong>OPPOSING EVERYTHING</strong> is when a number of GOP  	legislators vote against Senator Franken&#8217;s first bill:  a bill <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> protecting rape victims</span>, working for companies with government  	contracts.  Here&#8217;s Jon Stewart, who points out what should be an  	obvious truth: &#8220;<strong>If, to protect Halliburton, you have to side against rape  	victims, you might want to rethink your allegiances.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>It recently came to light, in part because of the work done by the  	National Women&#8217;s Law Center, that in eight states, insurance companies can  	and do consider being the victim of spousal abuse a &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition</em>&#8221; that allows them to deny coverage.  State and  	Federal representatives from most of the eight states expressed immediate  	embarrassment and outrage over the situation, and most have already taken  	steps to remedy the matter. <strong>But not Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</strong>.   	When the president of the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, Marcia Greenberger, 	<a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_10_15/2009_10_15.html"> appeared before a Senate committee</a> to discuss the issue, Burr thought it  	appropriate to repeatedly interrupt and otherwise disrespect her:</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>:  If I could  get back to your question about the specific examples: they manifest themselves  in many different ways. For example, if a woman ends up in an emergency room  with cuts, bruises, broken arms, black eyes, typical injuries that result from  domestic violence, we know of instances where women are being denied insurance  coverage and neither the insurance company&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: My question&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;doesn&#8217;t view  that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;is specifically about  North Carolina&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;and I&#8217;m trying  to answer that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;and the insurance  commissioner tells me we haven&#8217;t had a case. We haven&#8217;t had anybody&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: Well, I&#8217;m trying  to explain. First, I think it&#8217;s great that he is now explicitly having a rule,  which as our report pointed out, didn&#8217;t exist before. So that&#8217;s really  excellent, because of the way insurance companies deal with this issue in  particular. They will often deny the coverage of victims and survivors of  domestic violence without saying that that&#8217;s the reason&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;I&#8217;m just going by  your report&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: You asked the  question about did we follow up and we did. </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: Well, I found more  information in my one call to North Carolina than I think your report did. </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Again?</em> Representative Bill Otto (R-Kansas) has obviously  	not been paying attention.  First he 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a video</a> on YouTube titled &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he raps (<em>and  	badly</em>) his various criticisms of President Obama, and about eating  	opossum, which he calls &#8220;<strong>the other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;  This obviously  	drew allegations of racism (<em>at a minimum it is childish, insensitive, and  	inane</em>), and eventually the clip was removed from the site.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/bill-otto-says-he-will-re_n_323686.html"> And now</a>&#8230;Otto says he&#8217;s going to repost the video, because it was his  	adult daughters who took the video down, and also because he fears that &#8220;<strong>People  	are going to think that this was done by people to shut me up.  I&#8217;m  	getting hate e-mails from Maryland to California, but, hey, that&#8217;s part of  	the game.</strong>&#8220;  Mr. Otto:  It&#8217;s not a <em>game</em>, it&#8217;s civil  	service and <strong>YOU</strong> are an elected official, <em>jackass</em>.  Next  	time, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">listen to your daughters</span>&#8230;and try to learn from the lessons of  	other, like the <strong>OTHER</strong> Kansas legislator who just recently got in a  	heap of trouble 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Kansas_Rep_GOP_needs_great_white_hope.html"> for saying</a> that the GOP is looking for a &#8220;<strong>great white hope</strong>&#8221; to  	defeat Obama.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Want the &#8220;<em>short version</em>&#8221; of the merry war between the White House  	and <em>FOX News</em>?  Here goes&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>WHITE HOUSE:</strong></span> FOX News <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/anita-dunn-fox-news-an-ou_n_316691.html"> serves as the propaganda arm</a> of the Republican Party.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BILL O&#8217;REILLY:</strong></span> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bill-oreilly-glenn-beck-d_n_318085.html"> Nuh uh</a>&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA MATTERS:</strong></span> Umm&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/fox_news_channel?tab=all">it&#8217;s  pretty obvious</a>, guys&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GLENN BECK:</strong></span> The administration is like the Nazis&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/glenn-beck-compares-fox-n_n_318784.html">and  we&#8217;re the Jews</a>!</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NEW STUDY:</strong></span> Not only is it true, but we found something  interesting:  Most of the anti-Obama forces aren&#8217;t particularly  racist&#8230;the only thing they have in common is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/gop-base-driven-by-bizarr_n_323796.html"> they all watch FOX News</a>, and because of this&#8230;<em>they believe some pretty  outlandish sh-t.</em></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s fun picking on CNN&#8217;s inability to both perform research and report  	news.  It&#8217;s especially fun&#8230;if you&#8217;re Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember the rather bizarre reactions from some members of the media  	when Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize?  Well, Rachel Maddow thinks it  	can all be explained by &#8220;<em>Obama Derangement Syndrome:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>By now you&#8217;ve heard that the Senate Finance Committee managed to pass  	the &#8220;<em>Baucus Bill.</em>&#8220;  You also heard that Republican Olympia Snowe  	(R-Maine) voted along with the Democrats to send the bill on.  And  	recently, 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33308113/ns/politics-health_care_reform/"> it may have come to your attention</a> that another Maine Republican,  	Senator Susan Collins, may also lend her support for the bill.  Well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/exclusive-moveon-whacks-f_n_318640.html"> MoveOn.org</a>, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal  	Employees, the AFL-CIO, and the Communications Workers of America would like  	to remind you:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/senate-health-bill-oppose_n_318920.html"> it&#8217;s a CRAPPY bill</a>, that would make a mountain of money for the  	insurance companies, would change little in the way they do business, and  	would <strong>NOT</strong> serve to get all of America&#8217;s uninsured the health care coverage  	that they need.  In fact&#8230;any <strong>OTHER</strong> House and Senate version  	might just be a better choice.</li>
<li><strong><em>Thank you, Captain Obvious:</em></strong> The most ridiculously  	unnecessary headline in health care reform news 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/13/AR2009101303472.html">comes courtesy</a> of <em>The Washington  	Post</em>:  &#8220;<strong>Health Insurers Emerge as Obama&#8217;s Top Foe in Reform  	Effort.</strong>&#8221; That&#8217;s right&#8230;.&#8221;<em>emerging</em>&#8220;&#8230;as if it weren&#8217;t  	always the case.</li>
<li>Think only our elected officials are in the pocket of the health  	insurance industry&#8230;but our stalwart media will be there to keep us  	informed of the truth regarding the health care debate.  <em>Maybe not.</em> CNN contributor, Alex Castellanos&#8230;has been 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140037">revealed</a> to be  	connected at the hip with America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (<em>AHIP</em>),  	the monolithic insurance lobby currently (<em>and ferociously</em>)  	campaigning to kill reform legislation.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t generally hear about &#8220;<em>progressive faith groups</em>,&#8221; but  	the <em>American Values Network</em> aims to change that.  They are 	<a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/healthcare/faces-ad/">currently  	releasing ads</a>&#8230;emphasizing the moral and religious arguments supporting  	heath care reform.  It&#8217;s not a difficult argument to make, and  	represents one of the best examples of &#8220;<em>fighting fire with fire</em>&#8221; that  	we have seen in a long time.</li>
<li>Is it obvious that former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has a new  	book out?  Not only has he been making the usual talk show rounds, but  	he also managed to inject a little sanity into the health care debate.   	Of right-wing assertions that the Obama plan represents &#8220;<em>socialized  	medicine</em>&#8221; and warrants comparisons to Britain, Canada, and France, Frist 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3tLHqGz7uE&amp;feature=player_embedded"> said on C-SPAN</a>, &#8220;<strong>What the Obama administration is doing is not  	socialized medicine.  Socialized medicine is where the government owns  	the hospitals, owns the doctors, and decides how people get paid.</strong>&#8220;   	Yes&#8230;thank you&#8230;<em>finally</em>&#8230;is everybody listening?</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>In Lakeville, Massachusetts, someone 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/10/13/swastika-obama-carved-int_ws_319331.html"> carved a swastika</a> and the word &#8220;<strong>Obama</strong>&#8221; into a golf course green.   	The course manager believes that someone used either a cleated golf shoe  	or some other tool to perform the vandalism.  Strange&#8230;one would certainly think  	that America&#8217;s golfers have had some extra time to get used to the idea of  	having a very popular, half African-American leader.</li>
<li><em><strong>NEW HERO:</strong></em> Dylan Ratigan hosts the &#8220;<em>Morning Meeting</em>&#8221;  	show on MSNBC, and lately has shown to be a tough, bright host&#8230;who knows  	how to play hardball.  In 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/dylan-ratigan-to-chamber_n_320397.html"> a recent interview</a> with Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S.  	Chamber of Commerce, Ratigan responded to Donohue&#8217;s attempts to claim that  	free, unfettered enterprise has the solutions to all problems by saying, &#8220;<strong>unless  	the government and people like you that lobby to the exemptions that allow  	banks to [speculate with taxpayer money] get out of the way, we will never  	have fair play again in this country and we&#8217;ll have job creation by virtue  	of taxpayer theft, which is ultimately destructive, and I would argue,  	treasonous to this country.</strong>&#8220;  When Donohue complained that, in  	essence, it&#8217;s harder to spread economic propaganda when the host asks hard  	questions, Ratigan responded, &#8220;<strong>Yes, it is.  Especially when you talk  	nonsense.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em><strong>Oh no they didn&#8217;t:</strong></em> The White House decided to take a  	play out of the &#8220;<em>Sarah Palin Media Strategy</em>&#8221; book, when confronted  	with the mounting criticism in the blogosphere regarding the  	administration&#8217;s failure to achieve civil rights goals for gay citizens.   	NBC White House Correspondent John Harwood 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-furious-at-white_n_317424.html"> reported</a>, &#8220;<strong>For a sign of how seriously the White House does or  	doesn&#8217;t take this opposition, one adviser told me today those bloggers need  	to take off their pajamas, get dressed and realize that governing a  	closely-divided country is complicated and difficult.</strong>&#8220;  <em> Caaaarefullll</em>.  Remember the role bloggers played getting Obama <em> into</em> the White House?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>UPDATE:</strong></span> The White House 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/white-house-disavows-claim-that-gay-critics-bloggers-are-part-of-internet-left-fringe/"> would like to disavow those comments</a>&#8230;never happened&#8230;nothing to see  	here.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now what could we possibly add to all that?  As CNN would say, we&#8217;ll &#8220;<em>leave  it there</em>&#8221; for now&#8230;and see you back here on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Of Disgrace &#8211; Will The Volatile Rhetoric STOP?</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/state-of-disgrace-will-the-volatile-rhetoric-stop/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/state-of-disgrace-will-the-volatile-rhetoric-stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census Worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enemy of Humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic Heritage Month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indoctrination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsmax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Increasingly, I am hearing grumbles from both liberal and conservative camps, regarding the DISMAL state of the American "conversation."  It appears, at least from my utterly, and admittedly, unscientific eavesdropping...people are actually, FINALLY growing weary of the heightened rhetoric, loaded with violent innuendo, and discernibly lacking in facts.  The problem is: they just aren't tired enough yet to really reject it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increasingly, I am hearing grumbles from both liberal and conservative camps&#8230;regarding the <strong>DISMAL</strong> state of the American &#8220;<em>conversation</em>.&#8221;  It appears, at least from my utterly, and admittedly, unscientific eavesdropping&#8230;people are actually, <strong>FINALLY</strong> growing weary of the heightened rhetoric, loaded with violent innuendo&#8230;and discernibly lacking in facts.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The problem is:</span> they just aren&#8217;t tired enough yet to <em>really</em> reject it.  They are still entertained by Glenn Beck&#8217;s disingenuous ranting&#8230;they are still charmed by Sarah Palin&#8217;s vacuous speeches&#8230;they are still believing what their elected officials are telling them, even when it contradicts all logic and common sense.</p>
<p>Well&#8230;if you are one of those people who is just <em>not quite disgusted enough</em> by the current state of affairs, here are some very recent news items to help you along:</p>
<p><strong>1 -- ENOUGH HYPOCRISY TO GO AROUND:</strong> Yesterday, the Senate Finance Committee <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/first-public-option-amend_n_303228.html">discussed Senator Rockefeller&#8217;s amendment</a> to add a public option to the bill.  While it was nearly a foregone conclusion that the amendment would not pass (<em>in fact, four Democrats voted against it</em>)&#8230;the discussion leading up to the vote was shameful.  Senator Grassley (R-IA) showed his usual disdain for factual information, citing studies from the conservatively biased Heritage Foundation, as well as a study by the Lewin Group&#8230;which is <strong>WHOLLY</strong> owned by a large health insurance company (<em>it is worth note that he disregards all of the credible studies, including the one done by the Congressional Budget Office</em>).  He joined the chorus of GOP lawmakers who openly admitted that their argument, that the public option would lead to a government takeover of health insurance&#8230;<strong>was a &#8220;slippery slope</strong>.&#8221;  Of course, this shows (<em>once again</em>) that these politicians don&#8217;t know that a &#8220;<em>slippery slope</em>&#8221; is a type of <strong>LOGICAL FALLACY</strong>&#8230;an indefensible argument, not supported by reason.  And they are <span style="text-decoration: underline;">openly</span> admitting this.  The second part of their argument is that &#8220;<em>government run programs are bad</em>&#8220;&#8230;.but then when confronted with their hypocrisy regarding the government-run Medicare program, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092703277.html">they don&#8217;t want any of its costs cut</a>, and they say that Medicare is <em>different</em> because Medicare is <strong>POPULAR</strong>.  Then, they have the nerve <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/despite-outrage-many-hous_n_304175.html">to boisterously object</a> to Representative Alan Grayson&#8217;s statement on  Tuesday that the GOP health care plan suggests &#8220;<strong>don&#8217;t get sick</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and if you do, &#8220;<strong>die quickly.</strong>&#8220;  This, while just last week, Representative Eric Cantor (R-VA) suggested to a constituent that her sick family member (w<em>ho had no insurance and needed surgery</em>) sell everything she own, so she will be poor enough to get on a government program&#8230;and then seek charity.  So why are the GOP making such empty and ridiculous arguments?  Why are the Democrats even <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/michael-moore-mocks-whiny_n_304033.html">too spineless</a> to conform to their own principles?  Simple&#8230;<em>they are all bought and paid for</em>:</p>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250602" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250602" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>2 -- THE &#8220;OBAMA YOUTH&#8221; FAUX CONSPIRACY:</strong> The latest fake outrage?  A group of school children are on tape singing a song about helping their country and President Obama&#8230;for African-American History Month&#8230;and the lyrics were sent home to parents ahead of time and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">nobody</span> objected.  So how does FOX News and the rest of the right-wing media respond?  Of course&#8230;they decry it as the worst kind of indoctrination, and go as far as to vehemently claim that this never happened (<em>and never would have happened</em>) under the Bush administration.  Except&#8230;<strong>it did</strong>.  There is a clip circulating of Bush with children&#8230;praising him for his handling of the Katrina disaster.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">That&#8217;s right:</span> it&#8217;s kids praising Bush&#8230;and over one of his biggest, most thorough <strong>SCREW-UPS</strong> of his presidency.  Here&#8217;s the coverage from <em>Countdown with Keith Olbermann</em> (<em>contains all the clips</em>):</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2LkE8AuIPkY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2LkE8AuIPkY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LkE8AuIPkY">www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LkE8AuIPkY</a></p></p>
<p><strong>3 -- DEMONIZING YOUR ENEMY 101: </strong>Representative Trent Franks (R-AZ) <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090929/ap_on_go_co/us_franks_obama">speaking to a right-wing conference</a> at the inanely titled &#8220;<em>How To Take Back America</em>&#8221; conference, told the assembled crowd: &#8220;<strong>Obama&#8217;s first act as president of any consequence, in the middle of a financial meltdown, was to send taxpayers&#8217; money overseas to pay for the killing of unborn children in other countries.  Now, I got to tell you, if a president will do that, there&#8217;s almost nothing that you should be surprised at after that. We shouldn&#8217;t be shocked that he does all these other insane things. A president that has lost his way that badly, that has no ability to see the image of God in these little fellow human beings, if he can&#8217;t do that right, then he has no place in any station of government and we need to realize that he is an enemy of humanity.</strong>&#8220;  Frank says that <strong>OBAMA</strong> does insane things?  What about a sitting congressman referring to the President and Commander in Chief of his country as &#8220;<em>an enemy of humanity?</em>&#8220;  How is <strong>THAT</strong> reasonable or sane?  At the same conference, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/61121/fear-of-fascism-gay-agenda-dominate-conservative-kickoff-for-midterm-elections">considerable time</a> was also given to the threat of the &#8220;<em>gay agenda</em>,&#8221; the &#8220;<em>fascist agenda,</em>&#8221; and the &#8220;<em>communist agenda</em>,&#8221; making it a veritable cornucopia of issues best categorized as &#8220;<em>things to scare uneducated rubes, entrenched bigots, and homophobes.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>4 -- SCAREMONGERING FOR DUMMIES:</strong> Meanwhile, the sick comedy team of Liz and Dick Cheney, would still like to tell you that Obama is making you less safe, that he is going to put terrorists in your neighborhood, and that he is going to let the terrorists kill you.  <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27705.html">Even the generals</a> are calling this &#8220;<strong>nonsense</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>scaremongering</strong>.&#8221;  Retired General David Maddox, former Army commander-in-chief for Europe, said:  &#8220;<strong>Some of the fear issues that are being raised in this are really unfortunate. It gets people excited about things they shouldn’t be excited about and impedes doing what is critical to this country. Get that damn symbol off the table.  We take a setback every time somebody, whether it’s the vice president or his daughter comes out and says the things that they say&#8230;We have to get out there again and just keep pounding.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>5 -- POLITICS MINUS ETHICS:</strong> Remember hearing about the census worker found dead in Kentucky?  Hanging from a tree, bound and gagged, with the word &#8220;<strong>FED</strong>&#8221; written on his chest?  No doubt murdered as the result of the litany of &#8220;<em>Census Conspiracy Theories</em>&#8221; being peddled by Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and others of the right-wing fringe?  Well the local authorities&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/census-workers-son-im-sur_n_303081.html">still haven&#8217;t ruled out suicide or accidental death</a>.  Now, Kentucky officials may not be the brightest on the planet&#8230;but I&#8217;m certain that even they don&#8217;t think this happened &#8220;<em>accidentally</em>,&#8221; or that the substitute teacher/cancer survivor/census worker did it to <strong>HIMSELF</strong>.  No&#8230;they are mere petty politicians&#8230;who don&#8217;t want to admit that the chickens are coming home to roost&#8230;that the violent, inflammatory hate speech emitting out of the GOP and the right-wing media has finally claimed its first, and most obvious victim.  The man&#8217;s son calls it &#8220;<strong>shameful</strong>&#8220;&#8230;but it is even worse than that.</p>
<p><strong>6 -- MORE CHICKENS COMING HOME TO ROOST:</strong> What is all the outrage and incendiary language producing?  Besides dead census workers?  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/28/kill-obama-facebook-poll-_n_302090.html">Incidents like this</a>:  Facebook, the social networking site, has had to disable the &#8220;<em>polling</em>&#8221; function because someone posted a poll asking if the president &#8220;<strong>should be killed.</strong>&#8220;  It&#8217;s a simple-to-understand social phenomenon, that has occurred at other times in history (for those willing to learn from history):  violent language, talk of killing political enemies, proclaiming the end of America, labeling opponents as the enemies of humanity, calling for armed insurrection&#8230;it invariably leads to public, violent ideation, threats, and eventually&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">actions</span>.  The Secret Service is investigating because, once again, threats against the president (<em>even if made in jest</em>) are <strong>ILLEGAL</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>7 -- YES, SADLY, MORE CHICKENS:</strong> Need other examples of where this is headed?  <em>Newsmax&#8217;s</em> columnist John Perry wrote a piece this week&#8230;<strong>OPENLY</strong> <strong>CALLING</strong> for an armed uprising against the government.  Perry wrote: &#8220;<strong>Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Newsmax</em> <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/newsmax-distances-itself-from-columnist-says-we-believe-in-constitutional-govt.php?ref=fpblg">would later pull the article</a>&#8230;and at the same time attempted to lamely justify the piece saying that the author was only &#8220;<strong>describing</strong>&#8221; the scenario&#8230;not &#8220;<strong>advocating</strong>&#8221; it.  This semantic word-play should only serve as further cause for our disgust&#8230;and I would, as I did in the previous item, remind readers that &#8220;<em>free speech</em>&#8221; is not without constraints, and inciting armed insurrection against the government is <strong>CLEARLY</strong> illegal.</p>
<p><strong>8 -- PRIORITIES, SHMIORITIES:</strong> What does Michael Steele, chairmen of the Republican National Committee, think of the rhetoric, and the threats and violence it&#8217;s spawning?  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/michael-steele-calls-thom_n_304402.html">Steele says</a> in response to calls to tone down the level of discourse: &#8220;<strong>Where do these nut jobs come from? Come on, stop this&#8230;To make those equations, examples and put that out there that way, to me is just crazy and yeah, I&#8217;m sorry, but if you&#8217;re going to approach this discussion, approach it from a rational position.  [They're] saying, because you disagree with the president on policy, that all of the sudden we&#8217;re going to make this leap into, you know, assassinations and all this other stuff. I mean, at the height of all this stuff on Bush and people complaining and protesting, and jumping up and down, you didn&#8217;t have this kind of conversation.</strong>&#8220;  See what he did there?  It&#8217;s how the conservatives are responding to <strong>ALL</strong> criticism.  When it was suggested that <strong>SOME</strong> of the people adamantly protesting the president MIGHT be harboring racist sentiments, the right-wing responded, &#8220;<em>They&#8217;re saying that <strong>ALL</strong> people who criticize the president are racists!</em>&#8220;  And now, that many are saying that the current level of unreasonable, inciting language by <strong>SOME</strong> could <strong>POSSIBLY</strong> lead to violence, the right-wing responds, &#8220;<em>They&#8217;re saying all people who criticize the president are going to cause an assassination!</em>&#8220;  It&#8217;s a childish, pat response to an argument&#8230;that they are going to lose.  It&#8217;s worth noting that the cause that Steele <strong>DOES</strong> think is worth fighting&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/steele-rips-obama-for-mak_n_302903.html">is denouncing Obama</a> for taking <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ONE DAY</strong></span> to travel to Copenhagen to try to get the Olympics to be held in Chicago.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;Steele, thinks it&#8217;s important to attack the president for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/gibbs-is-steele-rooting-f_n_303305.html">trying to bring the Olympics</a> (<em>with all the business and prestige that accompanies the event</em>) to an American city.  Not health care&#8230;not the increasingly violent tone of American political discourse&#8230;not Afghanistan&#8230;the <strong>OLYMPICS</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>9 -- JUST ASK BRISTOL:</strong> Teens know that &#8220;<em>abstinence programs</em>&#8221; are a joke.  Studies show that the government, under the Bush administration, spent <strong>MOUNTAINS</strong> of our money funding these programs&#8230;to <strong>NO EFFECT</strong>.  <a href="http://www.statesman.com/services/content/news/stories/local/2009/09/27/0927abstinence.html?cxtype=ynews_rss">Even Texas</a>&#8230;the number one recipient of &#8220;<em>abstinence program</em>&#8221; funds, is now changing their program to a more comprehensive sex education program&#8230;because under &#8220;<em>abstinence</em>&#8221; their teen birth rate stayed the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">third highest in the nation</span> and they have the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">highest percentage</span> of teen mothers giving birth more than once. So&#8230;it makes <strong>ZERO</strong> sense that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/panel-votes-to-restore-ab_n_303812.html">the Senate just approved</a> restoring the $50 million a year of federal funding to &#8220;<em>abstinence-only programs.</em>&#8220;  That is&#8230;it makes zero sense until I tell you it was the Senate Finance Committee led by Max Baucus, the same committee to produce the only health care reform bill out of five currently in Congress that has neither a public option, nor true reform&#8230;and that would net billions more in profits for the health care industry.  Suddenly, it all becomes clear how this happened&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>10 -</strong> <strong>AY, DIOS MIO! </strong>The Republican Party has failed miserably despite its attempts since the election to attract minority voters.  Its latest efforts related to Hispanic Heritage Month, <strong>won&#8217;t help very much</strong>.  It&#8217;s bad enough that the party&#8217;s leaders regularly spout anti-immigrant, xenophobic, anti-Hispanic propaganda&#8230;but <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/09/29/rncs-spanish-translation-of-hispanic-heritage-month-press-release-riddled-with-errors/">when their press release</a> (<em>in Spanish</em>) to the Hispanic community is literally <strong>FILLED</strong> with spelling, grammatical, and translation errors, well, it certainly doesn&#8217;t make them look very &#8220;<em>in touch</em>&#8221; with the Hispanic people.  I mean <span style="text-decoration: underline;">seriously</span>&#8230;if they had even had <strong>ONE</strong> Spanish-speaking person <strong>JUST LOOK AT</strong> the release&#8230;they could have avoided this.  The ad they put out&#8230;was in some ways even more insulting, since they failed to deem any prominent non-conservative Hispanics worthy of mention.  You would think they would at least have give some time to Sonia Sotomayor&#8230;<em>yeesh</em>.</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pQzTuJdJNlQ&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pQzTuJdJNlQ&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQzTuJdJNlQ">www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQzTuJdJNlQ</a></p></p>
<p>I read pieces like these and my first thought is, &#8220;<em>I wonder if they are ashamed&#8230;I wonder if they are embarrassed,</em>&#8221; and then I realize that since the behavior of our elected officials, our media, and our fellow citizens reflects on me&#8230;<strong>that I am embarrassed</strong>.  We all should be, because it is only by our permission that people such as these are given power, are given a voice.  And until we revoke the power and the pulpit from those who we do not wish to represent us&#8230;it is we who are equally at fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/state-of-disgrace-will-the-volatile-rhetoric-stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

