<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Michael Moore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/michael-moore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Obama&#8217;s Prize, Mary&#8217;s Baby, And Rush&#8217;s Testicles</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIGNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nataline Sarkisyan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Lowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality Liberation Front blog post our weekly "Chaos Theory" edition...featuring the very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected officials and members of the media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality  Liberation Front blog post our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition&#8230;featuring the  very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected  officials and members of the media.</p>
<p>&#8230;and it has been a <strong>VERY</strong> busy couple of days, leaving us with a lot of  ground to cover, so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The request made a year ago for Sarah Palin&#8217;s emails&#8230;<a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/965388.html">still  	unfulfilled</a> by the Governor&#8217;s Office, that usually responds to such &#8220;<em>public  	record requests</em>&#8221; in <strong>TEN DAYS</strong>.  The department says that it  	sometimes takes longer for &#8220;<em>complicated</em>&#8221; requests&#8230;but since we all  	know that pulling up archived emails is not complicated, some are asking  	what the delay <strong>REALLY</strong> signifies.</li>
<li>Senator Kyl (R-AZ) may have really stepped in it when he mocked women&#8217;s  	need for Maternity Care to be covered by their insurance&#8230;saying it wasn&#8217;t  	fair to include it because, in his words: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t need maternity care</strong>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/kyl-hit-with-local-ads-sh_b_308405.html"> Not only have ads been run</a> in his state, to make women aware of Kyl&#8217;s  	statements&#8230;but now 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/arizona-mothers-storm-kyl_b_313458.html"> mothers are showing up</a> at his Senate Office in protest.  It certain  	doesn&#8217;t help Kyl and the GOP&#8217;s image with women voters, that they voted <strong> AGAINST</strong> an amendment that would bar companies from getting government  	contracts&#8230;if they pressure female employees not to file harassment claims.</li>
<li>In an increasingly disturbing trend involving Republicans attempting  	label Democrats as &#8220;<em>enemies</em>&#8221; of America, Representative Paul Broun  	(R-GA) 	<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/broun-pelosi-a-domestic-enemy-of-the-constitution.php?ref=fpblg"> referred to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi</a> as a &#8220;<strong>domestic enem[y] of the  	Constitution.</strong>&#8220;  Broun wasn&#8217;t finished: &#8220;<strong>When I was sworn into  	the Marine Corps, I was sworn to uphold the Constitution against every  	enemy, foreign and domestic.  We&#8217;ve got a lot of domestic enemies of  	the Constitution and one of those sits in the speaker&#8217;s chair of the United  	States Congress, Nancy Pelosi.</strong>&#8220;  Broun, when you were sworn into  	the Marine Corps, you were also sworn to obey and respect your Commander in  	Chief&#8230;but that didn&#8217;t stop you from calling Obama &#8220;<em>Hitler.</em>&#8220;   	Maybe you didn&#8217;t understand your oath?</li>
<li>Of course, Broun isn&#8217;t the only one lobbing insults at Pelosi&#8230;the  	National Republican Congressional Committee said Pelosi should &#8220;<strong>be put in  	her place</strong>&#8221; over her remarks about Afghanistan.  Number of  	Republican, female legislators and Republican women&#8217;s groups 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/female-republicans-fail-t_n_314265.html"> willing to declare</a> the statement sexist and inappropriate:  <strong>ZERO</strong>.   	Representative Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no</span>.  Representative  	Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nope</span>.  Representative Sue Myrick  	(R-N.C.)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nuh uh</span>.  Representative Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">not  	a word</span>.  Representative Mary Bono Mack&#8217;s (R-CA)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no way</span>.   	The list of shame goes on, and on&#8230;<strong>sad</strong>.</li>
<li>Robert Lowry, the Republican running against Representative Wasserman  	Schultz in her bid for re-election&#8230;well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/robert-lowry-shoots-targe_n_315229.html"> he thought it would fun</a> at a &#8220;<em>shooting event</em>&#8221; to shoot at a  	target, which showed the silhouette of a body, and upon which Wasserman  	Schultz&#8217;s initials had been written next to the head of the target.   	First he tried to call it a &#8220;<strong>joke</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and then later said it was a &#8220;<strong>mistake</strong>.&#8221;   	You were right the second time Lowry&#8230;<em>it&#8217;s a big mistake</em>.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/boehner-pence-vote-agains_n_314194.html"> That&#8217;s right</a>:  the latest defense bill&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">the Republicans are  	voting against it</span>&#8230;because it also has provisions that would protect  	gay people against violence.  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Message received:</span> </strong>The GOP  	believes in defending America&#8217;s citizens&#8230;<em>just not if they&#8217;re gay</em>.</li>
<li>Paul Krugman has written 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion"> an interesting column</a> about the GOP&#8217;s current &#8220;<em>politics of spite</em>:&#8221;   	that they will vote against anything, no matter how worthwhile, if it came  	from the President or other Democrats.  How else can you explain that 	<strong>THIRTY</strong> Republican Senators voted against Al Franken&#8217;s bill to punish  	government contractors who &#8220;<strong>restrict their employees from taking  	workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court?</strong>&#8220;   	The Senators who voted against the bill are:</li>
<p><strong>Alexander (R-TN)<br />
Barrasso (R-WY)<br />
Bond (R-MO)<br />
Brownback (R-KS)<br />
Bunning (R-KY)<br />
Burr (R-NC)<br />
Chambliss (R-GA)<br />
Coburn (R-OK)<br />
Cochran (R-MS)<br />
Corker (R-TN)<br />
Cornyn (R-TX)<br />
Crapo (R-ID)<br />
DeMint (R-SC)<br />
Ensign (R-NV)<br />
Enzi (R-WY)<br />
Graham (R-SC)<br />
Gregg (R-NH)<br />
Inhofe (R-OK)<br />
Isakson (R-GA)<br />
Johanns (R-NE)<br />
Kyl (R-AZ)<br />
McCain (R-AZ)<br />
McConnell (R-KY)<br />
Risch (R-ID)<br />
Roberts (R-KS)<br />
Sessions (R-AL)<br />
Shelby (R-AL)<br />
Thune (R-SD)<br />
Vitter (R-LA)<br />
Wicker (R-MS)</strong></ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>It was a hard week for FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity.  First&#8230;former comedian  	and now noticeably <strong>UNFUNNY</strong> political hack, Dennis Miller (<em>what  	happened to you, Dennis&#8230;seriously</em>) appeared on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor.   	After Miller was done poking fun at CNN and MSNBC&#8230;he went after Hannity  	and Beck.  Of course&#8230;after that, he kissed O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s behind&#8230;and  	Beck&#8217;s&#8230;and Roger Ailes&#8217;&#8230;and all the women on FOX&#8230;<em>yick</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA">www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Next up in Hannity&#8217;s &#8220;<em>not-so-hot</em>&#8221; week&#8230;his smear campaign  	against Kevin Jennings, who President Obama has appointed Assistant Deputy  	Secretary at the Department of Education for the Office of Safe and Drug  	Free Schools, was derailed by Hannity&#8217;s guest, George Stephanopoulos.   	Hannity was, as usual, attempting to misrepresent Jennings as some sort of &#8220;<em>lefty-gay-activist-who-is-going-to-turn-all-kids-gay</em>&#8220;&#8230;but  	George wasn&#8217;t having any of it, and points out that 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/03/kevin-jennings/">the facts just  	aren&#8217;t on Hannity&#8217;s side</a>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4">www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>The third &#8220;<em>Hannity Fail</em>&#8221; came when Hannity decided he had what it  	took to face off against filmaker Michael Moore&#8217;s facts&#8230;armed only with  	his usual assumptions and generalizations:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Saturday, we wrote about conservatives rejoicing over America&#8217;s loss (<em>regarding  	the Olympics</em>)&#8230;simply because it is also a loss for Obama.  We  	also mentioned that one conservative set aside partisanship and actually  	wrote a column thanking the President for trying to bring the Olympics (<em>and  	the resulting pride, revenues, and JOBS</em>) back to our country.  That  	conservative was talk show host, and former Republican legislator, Joe  	Scarborough.  So what can we expect when a conservative takes a &#8220;<em>time  	out</em>&#8221; to behave like a reasonable, patriotic American?  <strong>That&#8217;s  	right</strong>&#8230;Rush Limbaugh  has decided to pronounce Scarborough a &#8220;<strong>neutered  	chickified moderate.</strong>&#8220;  You have to appreciate that Scarborough,  	unlike so many other conservatives to face Rush&#8217;s wrath, did not back down:  	&#8220;<strong>I would be careful if I had put my testicles in a blind trust for George  	W. Bush for eight years.  So now, I guess what you do to prove that  	you&#8217;re a real conservative, because you weren&#8217;t a real conservative over the  	past eight years, you call the president names.</strong>&#8221; <em>Yowch</em>!</li>
<li>As one last item&#8230;let&#8217;s watch Stephen Colbert mock Glenn Beck&#8217;s  	breathless and weepy fearmongering, <em>as only Colbert can</em>&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OVAL OFFICE:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>President Obama&#8230;<a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html">has  	won the Nobel Peace Prize</a>.  For his work to advance nuclear  	disarmament, foster better relations with Muslim countries, and to encourage  	cooperation towards shared goals, Obama has been awarded the most  	prestigious peace award the international community can bestow.  The  	citation reads, in part, &#8220;<strong>Obama has as President created a new climate in  	international politics,&#8221; the citation read, in part. &#8220;Multilateral diplomacy  	has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United  	Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and  	negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most  	difficult international conflicts.</strong>&#8220;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obamas-nobel-prize-inspir_n_315167.html"> Two very interesting groups</a> have received this news with disgust and  	outrage: <em>American conservatives&#8230;and Taliban/Al Qaeda/Terrorist  	organizations</em>.  In fact&#8230;Rush Limbaugh went as far 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910090029">as to say</a>, &#8220;<strong>Our  	president is a worldwide joke. Folks, do you realize something has happened  	here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about and that is he  	doesn&#8217;t deserve the award. Now that&#8217;s hilarious, that I&#8217;m on the same side  	of something that the Taliban, and that we all are on the same side as the  	Taliban.</strong>&#8220;  Are you sure that&#8217;s what you really want to say,  	Rush&#8230;that you side with <strong>TERRORISTS</strong> against the <strong>PRESIDENT</strong>?   	Joe Scarborough and his guests 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obama-nobel-prize-a-disas_n_314997.html"> voiced a very different complaint</a>&#8230;that receiving an &#8220;<em>international  	award</em>&#8221; can <strong>ONLY</strong> be seen as a bad thing.  Scarborough said, &#8220;<strong>The  	upside is the Nobel Prize committee that has had suspect selections in the  	past has just befuddled a lot of people across the world</strong>,&#8221; and <em>Time</em>&#8216;s  	Mark Halperin added, &#8220;<strong>I predict right now that he will find a way to  	basically turn it down&#8230;I think he is going to say, I share this with the  	world or whatever. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll embrace this. Because there is no  	upside.</strong>&#8220;  Really?  The Nobel Peace Prize?  I  	mean&#8230;really?  You&#8217;re going to call receiving it a <strong>NEGATIVE</strong> event?</li>
<li><em>Saturday Night Live</em> chose to use its knack for scathing political  	satire to point out a more common complaint about President Obama&#8230;he just  	hasn&#8217;t done that much.  And given that we still have troops in Iraq and  	Afghanistan, Wall Street remains unregulated, 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091003/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_climate_bill_obama_7"> we&#8217;re told</a> not to expect Climate Change legislations, and they say that  	Obama 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/04/obama-to-take-on-dont-ask_n_309040.html"> will start to fight</a> for gay people&#8217;s civil liberties at the &#8220;<strong>right  	time</strong>&#8220;&#8230;it seems SNL may have a good point:</li>
</ul>
<p><object id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="384" height="283" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="384" height="283" src="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Health Care Reform has a new ally:  former Presidential candidate,  	and former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kansas).  Not only did  	Dole predict that the bill will be signed in 2010&#8230;<a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/20187">he  	explained exactly why</a> Republicans are opposing it: &#8220;<strong>Sometimes people  	fight you just to fight you.  They don&#8217;t want Reagan to get it, they  	don&#8217;t want Obama to get it, so we&#8217;ve got to kill it&#8230;Health care is one of  	those things.  Now we&#8217;ve got to do something.</strong>&#8220;  Dole warned,  	as other analysts have, that blind opposition to reform will, in the end,  	help the President politically and hurt the GOP.  As more distinguished  	GOP leaders from days past come forward and make these assertions&#8230;it seems  	to be having an impact, and there is some word that the GOP might be  	scrambling to find ways to both save face and vote for the bill.  	<a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/10/07/breaking-senate-gop-folding-over-health-care-reform/"> RedState.com&#8217;s Erick Erickson</a> reports,  &#8220;<strong>I am told quite reliably that in a meeting today on Capitol Hill,  		Republican Senators began to rapidly move toward concessions on health  		care because they are afraid they cannot hold their members. Some  		Republicans are now thinking of supporting a government program.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>There&#8217;s new life in the &#8220;<em>public option</em>&#8221; and some are calling it  	the &#8220;<em>opt-out public option</em>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/schumer-opt-out-public-op_n_313946.html"> Details are few</a>, but it appears that it would involve a government-run  	insurance plan&#8230;and states could choose not to allow it in their state.   	Democrats and several Republicans seem nominally on board with this, with  	two primary concerns:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>One</strong></span>&#8230;is it a &#8220;robust&#8221; version of  	the public option, or a watered down one.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Two</strong></span>&#8230;how many  	people will it truly help, if many states choose not to implement it?   	The first seems a valid concern, while the second does not.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Our  	prediction:</strong></span> If states choose <strong>NOT</strong> to allow their  	citizens the option to buy affordable public insurance in their state&#8230;it  	will be political suicide for those governors and legislators.  People  	will leave states that don&#8217;t offer it&#8230;and will vote out of office the  	people responsible for not allowing it to be purchased, particularly once  	word gets out that the people who <strong>DO</strong> purchase it in other states, are  	very pleased with it.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/cigna-employee-flips-off_n_314189.html"> Hilda and Krikor Sarkisyan</a> travelled with friends and supporters to the  	CIGNA headquarters in Philadelphia to speak to the CEO&#8230;and to complain  	that his company&#8217;s actions had <strong>KILLED THEIR DAUGHTER</strong>.  CIGNA had  	refused to pay for their daughter&#8217;s liver transplant because they said that  	the completely proven and established surgery was&#8230;wait for it&#8230;&#8221;<strong>too  	experimental</strong>.&#8221;  CIGNA eventually, following protests, changed its  	mind, but it was too late for Nataline Sarkisyan.  While there, several  	CIGNA employees on a balcony decided to show their support and sympathy for  	the Sarkisyans&#8230;by heckling them and making obscene gestures, and  	eventually the police were called to remove the Sarkisyans from the  	property.  CIGNA&#8217;s HR Director&#8217;s response: &#8220;<strong>I was very disappointed  	to learn of the behavior of one of our employees when you were at our  	company&#8217;s headquarters.  I sincerely regret this individual&#8217;s offensive  	and inappropriate action.  Please know that he did not represent the  	views of our company or the views of other employees who work here. We  	deeply empathize with you and wish you peace and comfort in your loss.</strong>&#8220;   	Sorry&#8230;I don&#8217;t think one smarmy letter from your company&#8217;s HR hack is going  	to smooth this one over.  To make matters worse, the Sarkisyan&#8217;s can&#8217;t  	take legal action:  A 1987 Supreme Court ruling <span style="text-decoration: underline;">shields CIGNA from  	lawsuit</span>.</li>
<li>Still haven&#8217;t seen Keith Olbermann&#8217;s special on Health Care Reform?  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/olbermanns-health-care-sp_n_313392.html"> See it here</a>.  <em>Seriously</em>, go watch it now&#8230;we&#8217;ll wait right  	here for you to come back.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Dick Cheney has been noticeably absent from the talk show circuit as of  	late&#8230;most likely because he is about to be under serious investigation  	regarding his part in the &#8220;Valerie Plame Scandal&#8221; and his part in  	authorizing torture, or perhaps because President Obama has now made 	<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/10/cheney-and-co-all-quiet-counterterrorism-front"> substantial gains in the area of counter-terrorism</a>.  Liz Cheney,  	after a few public debacles where defending her father&#8217;s ideology served  	only to make her appear insufficiently informed on all topics, has similarly  	been off the radar.  But that&#8217;s all ok&#8230;because there is still <strong>ANOTHER</strong> Cheney:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mary Cheney</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;The latest of the family to  	grab headlines is Dick Cheney&#8217;s lesbian daughter&#8230;who is now pregnant, and  	on the way towards having her second child with her partner, Heather Poe.   	Well, since Dick Cheney has come out supporting his daughter fully, and has  	switched to a &#8220;<em>pro-gay marriage</em>&#8221; stance, I&#8217;m sure that the rest of the  	conservative community will be totally fine with this.  What&#8217;s that?   	Oh&#8230;maybe not.  Here is just a sampling of the nauseating reactions 	<a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/mary_cheney_and_heather_poe_to_have_second_child_in_november_freepers_react/"> gathered from</a> the conservative site, the Free Republic, by Pam  	Spaulding:</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;<strong>I respect Dick Cheney, but I don&#8217;t understand why he is allowing his  daughter to take innocent children into her lesbianic home. Can anyone claim  that these kids won&#8217;t be scarred for life? So sad. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Also repugnant, IMNSHO, is the use of &#8216;they are expecting a child&#8217; when,  for obvious reasons &#8216;they&#8217; could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight  [sic] of hand that the left does with rediculous [sic] name reversals (like  &#8216;FAMILY PLANNING&#8217;) that implies something that in fact does just not happen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><strong>As much as I don&#8217;t like it, God will have to sort this out in the end.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Who is the father? Yes, you selfish lesbians, there is ALWAYS a father.  Not that the baby will benefit from one. sick.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this occasion? Yathink?  Congratulations on your baster bastard?</strong>&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>75 years ago, the Veterans of Foreign Wars erected a cross in the Mohave  	Desert, to commemorate soldiers who lost their lives in WWI.  The  	problem:  it&#8217;s federal land, and a former National Parks employee (<em>who,  	it should be noted, is a devout Catholic</em>) says that he has no problems with  	crosses&#8230;he just has a problem with a cross on public land.  Citing  	the Separation Of Church and State, this employee also points out that the  	memorial is clearly unfair to soldiers who were Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, or  	who practiced any faith (<em>or no faith</em>) other than Christianity.  It&#8217;s a  	good thing we have nine clear-headed Supreme Court Justices who can settle  	this easy dispute.  <strong>Or</strong>&#8230;.maybe there are only eight clear-headed  	Justices&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/scalia-defends-cross-on-p_n_313625.html">here&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia</a>: &#8220;<strong>It&#8217;s erected as a war memorial. I assume it is  	erected in honor of all of the war dead.  What would you have them  	erect?&#8230;Some conglomerate of a cross, a Star of David, and you know, a  	Muslim half moon and star?&#8230;I don&#8217;t think you can leap from that to the  	conclusion that the only war dead that that cross honors are the Christian  	war dead. I think that&#8217;s an outrageous conclusion.</strong>&#8220;  Yes&#8230;that&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia, who holds one of the highest positions in the land&#8230;saying  	that a cross <strong>REPRESENTS EVERYBODY</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope for a quiet weekend&#8230;some of these folks could use a little  &#8220;<em>quiet reflection time</em>.&#8221;  Until Monday&#8230;have a great one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s First 100 Days: Victories, Failures, and What&#8217;s Next</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/obamas-first-100-days-victories-failures-and-whats-next/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/obamas-first-100-days-victories-failures-and-whats-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scorecard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for a rare "Saturday Post" on the Reality Liberation Front...I couldn't resist, given the fascinating article in this month's Rolling Stone titled, "Obama So Far," where David Gergen, Paul Krugman, and Michael Moore weigh in (with others) on the accomplishments, failures, and other points of interest regarding President Obama's first 100 days in office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for a rare &#8220;<em>Saturday Post</em>&#8221; on the Reality Liberation Front&#8230;I  couldn&#8217;t resist, given the fascinating article in this month&#8217;s <em>Rolling Stone</em> titled, &#8220;<em>Obama So Far</em>,&#8221; where David Gergen, Paul Krugman, and Michael  Moore weigh in (<em>with others</em>) on the accomplishments, failures, and other  points of interest regarding President Obama&#8217;s first 100 days in office.</p>
<p>I wanted to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>briefly</em></span> summarize the points from the article, but  highly recommend the entire piece which may be read <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/29551986/barack_obama_so_far"> here</a>.  All items below come straight from the article with minimal  paraphrasing/editorial on my part&#8230;I want to make sure to provide due  recognition to the authors.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE ECONOMY:</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Accomplishments:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG WIN: </strong>The economic collapse, and subsequent massive  	depression&#8230;averted.  All major economic indicators from banking, to  	stocks, to housing, and unemployment&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">improving</span>.</li>
<li>Largest middle-class tax cut <em>in history</em> passed.</li>
<li>Negotiated massive bailout of developing economies at the G-20&#8230;it&#8217;s a  	world economy, and their salvation <em>is linked to ours</em>.</li>
<li>Managed to quickly get GM and Chrysler through bankruptcy, and on the  	mend.</li>
<li>Credit card reform&#8230;new rules to prevent exorbitant, unwarranted rate  	hikes.</li>
<li>New hedge fund regulations.</li>
<li>New consumer protection agency.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Struggles:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG CONCERN: </strong>Despite the backlash from the &#8220;<em>socialism  	tinfoil hat-wearers</em>,&#8221; the banks should have been temporarily  	nationalized, instead of just being given piles of money.</li>
<li>Stimulus money being spent in some areas&#8230;but not quickly enough in  	others.  Weatherization money has been particularly slow to be  	implemented, as well as the funds to prevent foreclosures.</li>
<li>Much-hyped plan to deal with banks&#8217; &#8220;<em>toxic assets</em>&#8220;&#8230;still in a  	holding pattern.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>To Do:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Wall Street may be seeing better days&#8230;but they still haven&#8217;t learned  	the lessons they should.  <strong>Regulations and a firmer hand are  	definitely in order</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HEALTH CARE REFORM:</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Accomplishments:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG WIN: </strong>Four million more children, mostly from the  	middle-class, now have health insurance.  That is&#8230;if the GOP efforts  	to steal it back from them during health care reform &#8220;<em>compromises</em>&#8221;  	don&#8217;t succeed.  Honestly, only Republicans would be trying to <strong>TAKE  	AWAY</strong> peoples&#8217; insurance right now.</li>
<li>Medication costs for seniors&#8230;reduced to the tune of a whopping $80  	billion.</li>
<li>Hospital costs&#8230;deals resulted in a $100 billion reduction.</li>
<li>FDA will, <strong>FINALLY</strong>, regulate the tobacco industry.</li>
<li>Stem cell research, with ethical restrictions, can now proceed&#8230;undoing  	part of Bush&#8217;s war on &#8220;<em>all scientificky things</em>.&#8221;</li>
<li>Extended the health insurance benefits to the unemployed.</li>
<li>$19 billion given to computerize medical/hospital records.  Should  	have been done a <strong>LONG</strong> time ago.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Struggles:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG CONCERN: </strong>Initial attempts to promote health care reform  	met with unfavorable Congressional Budget Office price tags.  Even when  	these costs were addressed&#8230;the damage was, <em>in a way</em>, already done:  	the initial reports had cast a shadow of lingering doubt over what the final  	tally would be.</li>
<li>Deals to cut drug costs&#8230;don&#8217;t include generics.</li>
<li>Gave a little ground on the importance of the &#8220;<em>public option</em>&#8221; for  	insurance.  Loss of the option would change the &#8220;<em>health care reform</em>&#8221;  	bill, to a &#8220;<em>health care tweak bill.</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>To Do:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The AFSCME union is attempting to kill the taxing of the health benefits  	of America&#8217;s &#8220;<em>millionaire club</em>.&#8221;  This tax could provide as much  	as $500 billion dollars per year&#8230;no small thing.  <strong>Obama has to  	take the gloves off with them&#8230;</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ENVIRONMENT:</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Accomplishments:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG WIN: </strong>The Environmental Protection Agency now has the  	authority to regulate climate-warming pollution.</li>
<li>2 million acres of public land is now protected&#8230;more than Bush did the 	<strong>ENTIRE</strong> time he was in office.</li>
<li>Allocated stimulus money to developing and implementing green tech.</li>
<li>Enhanced the enforcement of environmental regulations.</li>
<li>Joined international treaty to phase out &#8220;<em>toxic mercury</em>.&#8221;</li>
<li>Bush&#8217;s ill-conceived drilling permits near our national parks&#8230;<strong>REVOKED</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Struggles:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG CONCERN: </strong>Supported expensive, and impractical, research  	into &#8220;<em>carbon capture and sequestration.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>Couldn&#8217;t get China and India on board with commitment to reduce global  	greenhouse emissions&#8230;and they are two of the world&#8217;s <strong>WORST</strong> offenders.</li>
<li>Allowed logging in the Tongass National Forest.</li>
<li>Endorsed a House bill, that would &#8220;<em>give away carbon-pollution permits</em>&#8220;&#8230;this  	breaks one of his campaign promises.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>To Do:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Coal.  &#8220;<em>Clean coal</em>&#8221; is a non-starter&#8230;most don&#8217;t even  	believe it is possible.  Meanwhile, extremely destructive coal mining  	projects and practices continue unabated.  Obama should abandon the &#8220;<em>clean  	coal</em>&#8221; concept, <strong>and move quickly to some practical regulations and  	controls.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>EDUCATION:</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Accomplishments:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG WIN: </strong>$115 billion will be spent to provide the nation&#8217;s  	schools with long overdue modernization, save teaching jobs, and perform  	massive improvements in our higher education system to ensure our grads stay  	competitive.  I write &#8220;<em>stay competitive</em>&#8220;&#8230;realistically, I  	should write &#8220;<em>become competitive.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>More low income student are now able to attend college&#8230;thanks to  	enhanced grants and tax credits.</li>
<li>Private lenders&#8230;no longer able to profit unfairly from student loans.</li>
<li>$4 billion in grants so states can implement merit pay for teachers.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Struggles:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>BIG CONCERN: </strong>The stimulus boost may me significant&#8230;but  	some teacher layoffs will still occur, making already excessive class sizes  	continue to be a problem, new programs difficult to implement, and also&#8230;I  	see a lot of attention paid to teaching and classrooms, but not enough  	reform where it is needed: administration.</li>
<li>An emphasis on &#8220;<em>tougher exams</em>&#8220;&#8230;when will politicians learn that  	this has never been the answer and leads to unwanted classroom strategies  	and administrative &#8220;<em>data massaging</em>.&#8221;</li>
<li>Schools &#8220;<em>bailed out</em>&#8221; like the banks&#8230;like the banks, not enough  	strings attached.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>To Do:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Obama is pushing &#8220;<em>more tests</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>charter schools</em>&#8220;&#8230;sounds  	like Bush.  <strong>Like with Bush&#8230;not the answers.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, there are signs of progress, points of contention, and &#8220;<em>to do</em>&#8221;  items in other areas (<em>foreign policy, military actions, justice, gay rights,  national security, miscellaneous</em>), but the article seems to focus mostly on  the topics receiving the most press and publicity in recent months.  Any  chance I get to highlight the main points on these other topics&#8230;<strong>I will will  surely do so.</strong></p>
<p>Enjoy the rest of the weekend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/obamas-first-100-days-victories-failures-and-whats-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
