<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; PricewaterhouseCoopers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/pricewaterhousecoopers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Health Insurance Industry&#8217;s Eleventh Hour Threat&#8230;Misfires</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Ignagni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark McClellan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PricewaterhouseCoopers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Snowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Senate Finance Committee's version of the Health Care Reform Bill comes up for a vote today (as I'm writing this, it passed), we should have expected that there might be some "Eleventh Hour Drama."  It should also be a surprise to NO ONE that the sources of this drama...are the Republicans and the Health Insurance Industry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s version of the Health Care Reform Bill  comes up for a vote today (<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33290417/ns/politics-health_care_reform/">as  I&#8217;m writing this, it passed</a>), we should have expected that there might be  some &#8220;<em>Eleventh Hour Drama</em>.&#8221;  It should also be a surprise to <strong>NO  ONE</strong> that the sources of this drama&#8230;are the Republicans and the Health Insurance  Industry.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s take a quick look at the recent activities within each camp:</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Democrats:</strong></span> Working under the assumption that the bill  will survive the committee, Democrats are already heavily engaged in internal  negotiations.  It is important to remember that the so-called &#8220;<em>Baucus  Bill</em>&#8221; will have to be merged/reconciled with the Health Care Reform bills  coming out of the other Senate and House committees.  While most of these  bills carry a large number of common elements, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/12/AR2009101203165_pf.html"> Democrats are working to resolve</a> within their own ranks the support for  things such as the &#8220;<em>public option</em>,&#8221; and whether the bill will be &#8220;<em>paid  for</em>&#8221; with income-based taxes (<em>preferred in the House</em>) or taxes on the  so-called &#8220;<em>cadillac policies</em>&#8221; (<em>favored in the Senate</em>).</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Republicans:</strong></span> The GOP is having internal disputes as  well&#8230;<em>but of a very different nature</em>.  The current leadership has  drawn a hard line in pushing a &#8220;<strong>kill the bill, and defeat Obama</strong>&#8221; policy.   This policy was dealt its first blow, as Republican strategists pointed out that  &#8220;<strong>Yay, We Killed Health Care Reform</strong>&#8221; is not a slogan they&#8217;ll want to use  in the 2010 and 2012 elections&#8230;defeating Obama might look good on paper, but  if it means publicly destroying the reform of a dismal health care system, then  it will likely cost them more votes than it gains.  Then, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-10-07-gop-healthcare_N.htm"> another shock to the system</a>: respected, GOP, elder statesmen started coming  forward in support of Health Care Reform&#8230;some of them experts on Health Care.   These figures included former Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy  Thompson, former Senate Majority Leader and presidential candidate Bob Dole,  former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (<em>a surgeon</em>),  former  administrator of Medicare and Medicaid Mark McClellan.  These men would  soon be joined by some very high profile members of the current leadership,  California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal,  the latter of which is considered a health care policy expert.</p>
<p>While these announcements of support of Health Care Reform may have swayed  some critical, moderate members of the GOP&#8230;their party leadership was unfazed,  and they promptly let it be known that there would be consequences for GOP  members who supported reform.  Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), who holds a  key vote on the Senate Finance Committee, <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62727-sens-snowe-risks-perch">would  likely not be given the chairmanship</a> of the Commerce, Science and  Transportation Committee, a post for which she is next in line. <em>Snowe&#8217;s  answer</em>?  She&#8217;s <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/snowe-voting-yes-on-senat_n_318745.html"> voting for the bill</a>: &#8220;<strong>Is this bill all that I would want? Far from it.   Is it all that it can be? No. But when history calls, history calls, and I  happen to think that the consequences of inaction dictate the urgency of  Congress to take every opportunity to demonstrate its capacity to solve the  monumental issues of our time.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Health Insurance Industry:</strong></span> Up until yesterday, the industry  was thought to be &#8220;<em>on board</em>&#8221; with the Baucus Bill.  Why <strong>WOULDN&#8217;T</strong> they be?  It has everything they could hope for:  No public option&#8230;.<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.   Everyone forced to buy their policies&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Fines for people who  refuse to buy their policies&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Huge government subsidies so  they&#8217;ll cover poorer people&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  Few reforms forcing them to  offer better policies and service&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  No significant price  controls&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">check</span>.  So why, on the eve of the vote, would the  industry&#8217;s top lobbying group, America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), suddenly  declare war on the bill?  <strong>Two reasons&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><strong>1 -</strong> While it requires people to buy their lousy and overpriced  policies, and fines people if they don&#8217;t&#8230;the industry doesn&#8217;t <strong>THINK THE  FINES ARE HIGH ENOUGH</strong>.  So&#8230;they worry that they&#8217;ll only get 20  million new customers, not all 40 million uninsured.</p>
<p><strong>2 -</strong> The new requirement that they have to cover sick people and people  with pre-existing conditions&#8230;will just plain eat into their profits too much.</p>
<p>So, AHIP and it&#8217;s president Karen Ignagni, have released a study, a day  before the vote, that constitutes a simple <strong>THREAT</strong>:  &#8220;<em>If you pass  this bill&#8230;we&#8217;ll just have to raise everybody&#8217;s premiums by 111%.</em>&#8220;   Then, just for good measure&#8230;they <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/ahip-ad-campaign-targets_n_318690.html"> started running ads</a> trying to scare seniors that their Medicare Benefits  would be cut.</p>
<p>The reaction of the White House and Congress&#8230;<strong>NOT WHAT AHIP EXPECTED</strong>.   The White House <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/white-house-office-of-hea_n_317973.html"> pointed out that the timing of the report</a> is clearly political in nature (<em>thank  you, Captain Obvious</em>)&#8230;members of Congress, including members of the Senate  Finance Committee, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/senate-finance-committee-slams-ahip-report.php"> condemned the report</a> as &#8220;<strong>untrue, disingenuous</strong>&#8220;&#8230;health care experts  and critics point out that the assumptions of the study are quite extreme, and  that the company responsible for the study, <em>PricewaterhouseCoopers</em>, is  the same company that produced a study on behalf of &#8220;<em>Big Tobacco</em>&#8221; years  ago, and that study showed that taxes on cigarettes would lead to <strong>economic  armageddon</strong>.</p>
<p>But the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/weiner-ahip-report-makes_n_317561.html"> best reaction</a> came from some rather astute legislators like Representative  Anthony Weiner (D-NY):  This outlandish study&#8230;shows <strong>EXACTLY WHY</strong> we  need the public option.  This study, ironically produced by the Health  Insurance lobby, serves to illustrate clearly:</p>
<p>- The only thing to keep the insurance companies from passing on increased  taxes on their business straight onto the premiums of their policyholders&#8230;<strong>is  the public option.</strong></p>
<p>-  The only thing to keep the insurance companies from passing on the  cost of covering sick people and people with pre-existing conditions onto their  other customers&#8230;<strong>is the public option.</strong></p>
<p>-  The only thing to keep the insurance companies from punitively  punishing the American citizenry for supporting health reform&#8230;<strong>is the public  option.</strong></p>
<p>In short, we know that these companies will not allow <strong>ANYTHING</strong> to cut  into their enormous profit margins&#8230;not taxes, not sick people, not  expectations of quality&#8230;not unless they are <strong>PRESSURED</strong> through  competition in the marketplace to do so.  As Representative Weiner points  out, the only way to subject these companies to the pressures of competition, <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> would be through the implementation of a low cost, government-run alternative.</span></p>
<p><em>Otherwise</em>&#8230;for the industry it will just be business as usual.   And we are all very familiar with what <strong>that</strong> looks like.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Parting note:</strong></span> Interesting article on &#8220;<a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/13/five-things-you-dont-know-about-the-senate-health-care-bill/">Five  Things You Don&#8217;t Know About The Senate Health Care Bill.</a>&#8220;  Check it  out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/health-insurance-industrys-eleventh-hour-threat-misfires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

