<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; racism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/racism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans and Fox News: The New, Improved Southern Strategy</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/republicans-and-fox-news-the-new-improved-southern-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/republicans-and-fox-news-the-new-improved-southern-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chai Feldblum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fearmongering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part of Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Hoover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race baiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirley Sherrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not a new strategy.  The Democrats used it pre-civil rights...and Nixon used it, very successfully, post-civil rights to steal southern voters from the Democrats.  It's called the "Southern Strategy," and its cornerstone is a tactic known as "race-baiting."  Race-baiting is a way to allow racists to express themselves in a way that protects them from criticism, as well as a way for politicians to gain the votes of Americans harboring racist sentiments in a way that won't harm their standing among moderate voters.

Again...it's not a new strategy.  It's just never been employed as effectively as with the Republicans, conservative ideologues, and Fox News pundits who are using it today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the era of the civil rights struggle in America.  As is the case  today, there were two reigning political parties in America: <strong>The Republican  Party and the Democratic Party</strong>.  However, all was not the same <strong> WITHIN</strong> these parties.  In fact, on many policy positions, the parties  were &#8220;<em>flipped,</em>&#8221; compared to their modern equivalents.  Up until the  1960&#8242;s, the Republicans had been called the &#8220;<em>Party of Lincoln.</em>&#8220;   They were known, as was President Abraham Lincoln, for their support of civil  rights and equality, and a strong federal government which takes full precedence  over decisions made at the state level.  It is important to note that they  had already changed in one, significant way from the days of Lincoln: while  Lincoln had (<em>following what is known as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_%28economics%29">American  School</a> of economics</em>) shown a marked distaste for corporations,  instituted the Federal income tax, raised taxes, raised tariffs, funded large  public infrastructure projects, and created a series of national banks&#8230;the  Republican party had abandoned these ideas following the presidency of Herbert  Hoover, and now clearly supported &#8220;<em>big business</em>&#8221; and corporations,  lowered taxes and tariffs, and opposed federal banks and public works projects.</p>
<p>The Democrats of the civil rights era didn&#8217;t have too much in common with the  Democrats of today, either.  They were not the diverse party they are now,  nor did they place a strong emphasis on civil rights.  In fact, during the  civil rights struggles&#8230;they tended to stick with their platform of states&#8217;  rights, and to assert that each individual state could decide on how to handle  matters of discrimination, workplace inequality, and segregation.  They did  have one, big advantage in the South:  As the party representing workers  and unions over management and &#8220;<em>big business</em>,&#8221; they held dominant sway  over the southern states, which were more heavily populated by working class and  impoverished citizens than the other regions of the country.</p>
<p>Looking back at the two parties surely has a sort of &#8220;<em>looking glass</em>&#8221;  feel to it.  Each party was &#8220;<em>halfway</em>&#8221; towards the policies it holds  today&#8230;with only one major ideological flip needed to set things as they are  now.  This change would come courtesy of the Republican Party and its new  president in the early 1970&#8242;s: <strong>Richard Milhous Nixon</strong>.  Nixon, who  had come from a very poor background himself, knew of one sure way to lure  southern voters away from the Democratic Party&#8217;s grasp.  One subject that  would outweigh the voters&#8217; interest in jobs, income, and all other areas of  economic self-interest.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Race</strong></span>.  Nixon&#8217;s use of race to  influence voting, often accompanied with &#8220;<em>social conservatism</em>&#8221; issues,  would form the heart of what has come to be known in politics as the &#8220;<em>Southern  Strategy</em>&#8221; of the GOP.  This was not a completely <em>new</em> strategy.   In fact, during the civil rights struggles, Democrats had widely employed  race-baiting, a cornerstone of the &#8220;<em>Southern Strategy</em>,&#8221; as a defense  against the coming wave of changes, and with some success&#8230;they had won some  battles, while losing the overall war.  Republicans, like Nixon, <em>would  perfect its usage as a political tactic</em>.</p>
<p>You see, &#8220;<em>race-baiting</em>&#8221; is the politically-safer, passive-aggressive  version of &#8220;<em>overt racism.</em>&#8220;  The time had come in America when  overtly racist statements would cause the speaker to lose support among  liberals, moderates, and even many conservatives.  While many people at the  time still held racist beliefs, there was a growing common understanding that it  was not acceptable to utter them aloud.  Race-baiting allowed politicians  and other public figures to address racist voters, to play upon their  prejudice-based fears&#8230;while still being able to deny that they had said  anything &#8220;<em>racist</em>.&#8221;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Examples include:</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>- Showing photos, statistics, or simply retelling events in such a way as  to make people of a particular race look <em>menacing or dangerous</em>.</strong></p>
<p><strong>- Making claims of people of a particular race &#8220;<em>taking over</em>&#8221; in  terms of a locale, an industry, government power.</strong></p>
<p><strong>- Making claims that measures intended to help a disadvantaged group  overcome institutionalized prejudice are giving them an &#8220;<em>unfair advantage.</em>&#8220;</strong></p>
<p><strong>- Offering racists &#8220;<em>substitution terms.</em>&#8221; For example, instead of  calling a person a racist term, substituting terms like &#8220;<em>foreign</em>,&#8221; or &#8220;<em>socialist/communist/fascist,</em>&#8221;  or simply inferring that they are &#8220;<em>arrogant</em>,&#8221; or that they otherwise &#8220;<em>don&#8217;t  know their place.</em>&#8220;</strong></p>
<p><strong>- Intimating that the previously dominant race or culture is &#8220;<em>under  attack</em>&#8221; by the other race.  This attack may come in terms of social  norms, dress, music, religion&#8230;or even accusations inferring that interracial  reproduction some sort of &#8220;<em>danger</em>.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Suffice it to say, the strategy worked for the Republicans, and southern  voters have strongly supported them to this day.  The transformation was  now complete.  Democrats had become the party for minorities, civil rights,  centralized government power, labor and unions, higher taxes, and public works.   Republicans had become the party of big business, lower taxes, smaller  government, states&#8217; rights&#8230;<em>and prejudice</em>.</p>
<p>Then for nearly forty years&#8230;the Republicans didn&#8217;t need the &#8220;<em>Southern  Strategy</em>&#8221; as much.  The public trusted their assurances that they were  the party of &#8220;<em>fiscal responsibility</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>foreign policy experience</em>&#8221;  and so from the Reagan years to the end of the presidency of George W.  Bush&#8230;the tactics were rarely employed.  That is, until Barack Obama was  elected.  That is, until the people of this country found out that they  were anything but &#8220;<em>responsible</em>&#8221; with the country&#8217;s finances and anything  but &#8220;<em>skilled</em>&#8221; in terms of dealing with either friends <strong>OR</strong> enemies  abroad.</p>
<p>With no accomplishments to brag about, and their economic and diplomatic  skills under fire, Republicans, the Tea Party, and the rest of the nation&#8217;s  conservatives would resort to using the &#8220;<em>Southern Strategy</em>&#8221; once again.   Only this time, they had new tools to aid with its implementation: <strong>the  internet and Fox News.</strong> This time, the would not only target black  Americans&#8230;but also foreigners (<em>particularly Hispanics</em>), gays, and  Muslims.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Rachel Maddow, giving clear examples of Fox News&#8217; ongoing attempts to  play on the fears of white Americans:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_qAQ3XXxKAY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_qAQ3XXxKAY&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qAQ3XXxKAY">www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qAQ3XXxKAY</a></p></p>
<p>Fox News and the conservative blogosphere <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/23/naacp-honor-van-jones-national-treasure/"> went after</a> Obama&#8217;s advisor on Environmental Equality, Van Jones, with nearly  incessant coverage portraying him as someone with &#8220;<em>dangerously radical</em>&#8221;  views on race, and as a &#8220;<em>Marxist</em>&#8221; or &#8220;<em>Leninist</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>They also went after Kevin Jennings, Obama&#8217;s pick for &#8220;<em>Safe and Drug-Free  Schools</em>&#8221; czar&#8230;by <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/23/critics-assail-obamas-safe-schools-czar-say-hes-wrong-man-job/"> attacking him</a> for being gay, insinuating that he was somehow pro-pedophilia,  and stirring fears that he would allow gay teachers to &#8220;<em>turn students gay.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>They <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/31/obamas-pick-join-eeoc-blasted-conservative-groups/"> attacked</a> Chai Feldblum, Obama&#8217;s appointment to serve on the Equal Employment  Opportunity Commission&#8230;by stoking fears that she would &#8220;<em>promote gay sex,</em>&#8221;  and would give gays a hiring advantage over heterosexuals.</p>
<p>They have repeatedly covered items related to an ongoing theme: the supposed  &#8220;<em>war</em>&#8221; on Christianity.  Any other religious group enjoying the  freedom to practice their religioun&#8230;is portrayed as a &#8220;<em>threat</em>&#8221; to  Christians being able to practice theirs.  Sound ridiculous?  That&#8217;s  because it <strong>IS</strong>, and this was not lost on Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</p>
<p><object style="display: block;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:340607" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display: block;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:340607" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p>They gave a lot of time, and tacit support, to the new Arizona law, which  unconstitutionally requires Arizona&#8217;s police to ask anyone &#8220;<em>suspected</em>&#8221; of  being an illegal alien to prove his or her citizenship.  They allowed the  bill&#8217;s supporters to tell their viewing audience about the murders, kidnappings,  and beheadings occurring in their state due to lax border enforcement.  Of  course, what Fox did not do&#8230;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/09/AR2010070902342.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">is  to point out</a> that there have been no such beheadings, and that violent  crimes in these states have actually <strong>DECREASED</strong> over recent years.</p>
<p>Recently they <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2010/07/22/newsweeks-alter-furthers-lie-fox-news-led-sherrods-forced-resignation"> went after</a> the Department of Agriculture&#8217;s Shirley Sherrod, citing that a  film clip of her speaking at an event was just &#8220;<em>another example</em>&#8221; of  blacks in the Obama administration who are racially discriminatory against  whites.  The clip was quickly revealed to be deceptively edited&#8230;Sherrod  was actually telling a morality tale about <em><strong>overcoming racism</strong></em>, and  the speech took place many years before she was even a federal employee.</p>
<p>For the last week, they have been allowing <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/megyn-kellys-minstrel-show.html"> a single story</a> to dominate their headlines.  They show a picture of two  &#8220;<em>menacing</em>&#8221; black men from the New Black Panthers standing outside a  polling place, stoking fears of black radicals taking over the political  process.  Of course, they don&#8217;t focus on the fact that the men were removed  by police, banned from serving as poll-watchers, and that the Justice Department  justifiably decided not to press charges against the men because the case was so  weak.  They also don&#8217;t point out that while there are an abundance of case  examples of voter intimidation being perpetrated against blacks in this  country&#8230;there is just this one, ridiculous example of the reverse ever  occurring.</p>
<p>And countless times&#8230;Fox went after Obama himself.  They gave &#8220;<em>birthers</em>,&#8221;  those that claim Obama is not an American citizen, lots of air time.   They&#8217;ve attempted to paint him as &#8220;<em>arrogant</em>,&#8221; or &#8220;<em>socialist</em>,&#8221; or  as &#8220;<em>pushing a black agenda</em>,&#8221; at every available opportunity.   They&#8217;ve even gone so far as to directly call Obama&#8230;a &#8220;<em>racist</em>.&#8221;  In  fact, that&#8217;s the real hidden &#8220;<em>trick</em>&#8221; behind race-baiting: Since you&#8217;re  not making <span style="text-decoration: underline;">overtly</span> racist statements, if anyone accuses you of  racism&#8230;just deny it, blast them for &#8220;<em>playing the race card</em>,&#8221; and if  they are a minority member, you accuse <strong>THEM</strong> of being racist/prejudiced  against <strong>YOU</strong>.  This was recently the case when the NAACP called for  the Tea Party to condemn the racist positions of some of their supporters, due  to the <strong>PROVEN</strong> fact that a number of white-supremacy groups openly support  the Tea Party.  So how did the Tea Party respond?  They feigned  outrage at the suggestion that <strong>ALL</strong> of them are racists, even though no  such allegation had been made, and&#8230;wait for it&#8230;accused the NAACP of being  racist <em>against white people</em>.  It was only when the Tea Party&#8217;s  spokesperson made obviously racist comments on his blog, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/23/tea-party-groups-chief-sp_n_657518.html"> that he was forced to resign</a>.</p>
<p>I hear the effects of this strategy every day, living in the South.  I  hear men and women I work with whisper things about how &#8220;<em>hard it is to be  white, and Christian</em>&#8221; these days.  They moan about how they are &#8220;<em>under  attack.</em>&#8220;  They fear the &#8220;<em>effect</em>&#8221; that society&#8217;s growing  acceptance of homosexuality will have on their children.  They swear,  incorrectly, that ours was founded as a &#8220;<em>Christian nation,</em>&#8221; and that  people of other faiths should build their churches elsewhere.  They  complain about &#8220;<em>Mexicans</em>,&#8221; who according to them cause crime to rise (<em>incorrect</em>),  and who steal &#8220;<em>their</em>&#8221; jobs (<em>also incorrect</em>), and who soak up  massive amounts of tax dollars by receiving free services (<em>yup&#8230;also  incorrect</em>).  They complain that their lives would be &#8220;<em>so much easier</em>&#8221;  if they were black, Hispanic, or some other minority, and had everything &#8220;<em>given  to them</em>.&#8221;  These are the fruits of the &#8220;<em>Southern Strategy</em>&#8221; of  race-baiting: Large numbers of semi-literate, white people feeling victimized  and threatened by the very idea that someone else&#8230;.someone <strong>DIFFERENT</strong>&#8230;might  now live, work, worship alongside them.  Told that the racism they have  held, quietly in their hearts&#8230;can now be expressed as long as they do it using  certain careful terms, certain substitutions, certain &#8220;<em>code</em>.&#8221;  Told  that even in expressing their racism, <strong>THEY</strong> are not racists&#8230;because they  are the victims of the racism of the minorities.</p>
<p><strong>Lo! How the mighty &#8220;Party of Lincoln&#8221; has fallen.</strong></p>
<p>I only see one cure: We must rediscover our passion for the American ideals  that were set forth in the Declaration of Independence.  <a href="http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/">Read it here</a>.   I know, it&#8217;s been some time since you read it&#8230;so really let it sink in.   Now study the Founding Fathers and their passions&#8230;and let those passions  become yours.  For it will only be when we all accept the universality of  life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness&#8230;that our nation will experience  true growth, true unity, true national greatness.  It will only be when all  Americans embrace the idea that this nation was created as a haven of racial,  religious, ideological, and political tolerance&#8230;that we will be able to focus  our true and full attentions on the very real problems that face our country,  and that keep us from thriving.  It will only be when we all accept that  one group&#8217;s religious doctrine was never meant to dominate our government, our  schools, our workplaces, or our laws&#8230;that we will see that it is not about  what you or I believe, but instead, it is about what all of us agree on  together.</p>
<p><strong>And most of all: We must abandon our fears&#8230;especially our fears of each  other.</strong> Then&#8230;we must condemn those who play upon our fears for little  more than petty, partisan purposes.  Shame on you, Republicans&#8230;.shame on  you, Fox News&#8230;.shame on you Tea Party&#8230;.shame on you Breitbart, Michelle  Malkin, Ann Coulter, WorldNetDaily, Rush Limbaugh, and all you other ideologues.   And shame on us&#8230;for ever having listened to them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave you with Keith Olbermann&#8217;s spirited call to reject  race-baiting&#8230;if we all had such passion, it would already be a thing of the  past:</p>
<p>Part 1:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lcI8nWyugQs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lcI8nWyugQs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcI8nWyugQs">www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcI8nWyugQs</a></p></p>
<p>Part 2:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/34cynRWkPMs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/34cynRWkPMs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34cynRWkPMs">www.youtube.com/watch?v=34cynRWkPMs</a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/republicans-and-fox-news-the-new-improved-southern-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Immigrant Issue &#8211; Time To Look At Causes Not Symptoms</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/immigration_issue_look_at_causes/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/immigration_issue_look_at_causes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 23:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights of citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’ve been watching the news, the talk shows, or even just checking into your social network of choice…then it’s likely you’ve noticed a trend.  You’re hearing a number of outbursts and debates revolving around a central theme:  “Illegal immigrants go home.”  Those who espouse this view tend to focus solely on SYMPTOMS...those who genuinely care about the issue must start looking at CAUSES.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’ve been watching the news, the talk shows, or even just checking into your social network of choice…then it’s likely you’ve noticed a trend.  You’re hearing a number of outbursts and debates revolving around a central theme:  “<em>Illegal immigrants go home.</em>”</p>
<p>If a discussion ensues on the talk show or webpage in question, the individuals participating tend to make the following assertions:</p>
<p><strong>1 –</strong> They state that illegal immigration leads to increased crime, particularly drug-related crime</p>
<p><strong>2 –</strong> They state that illegal immigrants take jobs away from American citizens</p>
<p><strong>3 –</strong> They state that illegal immigrants are an economic drain, by not paying taxes, and by benefiting from services such as education and health care without paying for these services</p>
<p>4 – They state that their complaints regarding immigrants are not at all racially motivated</p>
<p>One could debate these points item by item, pointing out that there is no proven statistical relationship between immigrants and increased crime (<a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/3097078">here</a> and <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/04/29/arizona.immigration.crime/index.html?eref=rss_topstories&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_topstories+%28RSS%3A+Top+Stories%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher">here</a>),  or  that illegal workers beating out non-skilled citizens because they are willing to work harder and for less is actually a perfect example of the “<em>free market</em>” in action …and illegal immigrants actually represent a very necessary part of the American economy (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/01/news/economy/immigration_economy/index.htm">here</a> and <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=FJoXbhBivAwC&amp;dq=statistics+illegal+immigrants+and+jobs&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;source=in&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=SRfvS_mKJYT58AbZtuX9Cg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=11&amp;ved=0CEkQ6AEwCg#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">here</a>),  or that the Congressional Budget Office did a study showing that the impact of illegal immigrants on taxes and public services is negligible (<a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8711/12-6-Immigration.pdf">here</a>).</p>
<p>However, such a debate would only further a national conversation which continues to focus on the possible <span style="text-decoration: underline;">symptoms</span> of an issue…while avoiding <strong>ANY</strong> dialogue on the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">causes</span> of the issue.  A person calling for the immediate deportation of all illegal aliens for the reasons listed above<strong>, is much like a doctor who informs you are bleeding internally…that he’s going to stop the bleeding…that he’s not going to figure out what is causing it…and that it will definitely start bleeding again soon</strong>.  I doubt such a conversation with your doctor would bring you much comfort, and neither should such a superficial and naïve treatment of the immigration issue.</p>
<p>The causes I’m referring to?  Everyone knows what they are, but deliberately avoids discussing them:</p>
<p><strong>1 –</strong> Companies, most owned <span style="text-decoration: underline;">by American citizens</span>, hire illegal immigrants because they will work for much less, they don’t have to be given benefits, and if they complain about long hours, unsafe conditions, or unfair treatment…they can simply be turned over to immigration officials.  These businesses aren’t just lettuce-picking operations and factories; illegal workers are part of the budgets and bottom lines of many of the biggest corporations and industries in America.</p>
<p><strong>2 –</strong> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">American citizens</span>…lots of them…do illegal drugs.  This creates a booming, well-armed industry south of our border, which works day and night bringing the drugs that we do want, along with violence that we don’t want, across the border.</p>
<p>Let that sink in for a minute, and you’ll realize why these two points are rarely addressed.  If these are the causes, then illegal immigrants aren’t <em>really</em> the problem.  <strong>We are</strong>.  Us: American citizens with a vast need for recreational drugs and cheap products.</p>
<p>And when I think more about “<em>us</em>” and less about “<em>them</em>,” I am faced with a shameful realization.  At one point our families were “<em>them</em>”…and our immigrant ancestors would likely be ashamed of most of us.  Even more ashamed to know that most natural-born citizens in this country do not even know the names of their ancestors, or the countries they emigrated from.  <strong><em>I do</em></strong>.  In researching my family’s genealogy with my uncle, I learned many things.  Some of my family came across on the Mayflower…others were Irish farmers escaping the famine…others, French Huguenots escaping the religious persecution of the Reign of Terror…and there were German shipbuilders…and Dutch farmers.  My ancestors, like yours (<em>exempting friends of 100% Native American ancestry</em>), came here and were given a gift.  <strong>A big gift – the gift of opportunity</strong>.  They did nothing to earn it, other than landing on our shore…there was nothing about them that “<em>deserved</em>” it any more or less than anyone else.  This was clearly the intention of the constitutional framers; even a cursory reading of the Constitution will reveal that it does not bestow inalienable rights simply to “<em>citizens</em>.”  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">No</span></strong>.  The document specifically and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">intentionally</span> guarantees that the rights and freedoms listed belong to “<em>people</em>.”  What you probably didn’t know is that, the Constitution only refers to “<em>citizens</em>” in the areas of voting and eligibility for public office; the rest of it…applies to all people, even illegal immigrants.  <a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html">Read it for yourself</a>.</p>
<p>Like the immigrants of today, some of my ancestors (<em>and likely some of yours</em>) were called “<em>dirty</em>,” or “<em>criminally pre-disposed</em>,” and “<em>unwelcome</em>.”  But thanks to the opportunities our country gives to all people, and through their efforts, and the efforts of generations of their offspring, my existence was made possible.  Without our immigrant ancestors,  and the gift this country gave them, I would not be here…you would not be here.  And many of you repay them by calling a new generation of immigrants, someone else’s future ancestors, “<em>dirty</em>,” or “<em>criminal</em>,” or “<em>unwelcome</em>,” or otherwise “<em>less than</em>.”</p>
<p>I was born a natural-born citizen, like most of you reading this, and I did absolutely nothing to “<em>earn</em>” or “<em>deserve</em>” it.  That being said, and referring back to my remarks about the Constitution, it guaranteed me the right to vote upon reaching the age of 18, and the right to run for public office…and guaranteed no other “<em>special privileges</em>” or “<em>advantages</em>.”  It does not guarantee that all the jobs in this country only go to citizens.  It does not guarantee that only citizens like me will receive an education or health care.  So it seems the very height of irresponsibility for some to assert that simply because they were born here, an event for which they can take zero credit, they are somehow entitled to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">more</span> opportunity, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">more</span> advantages, or <span style="text-decoration: underline;">better</span> treatment.  Yes, that is the very definition of the “<em>entitlement</em>,” a trait that many of the “<em>critics of immigrants</em>” deride in others.   Our ancestors would scoff at such a ridiculous notion.  You have exactly the same “<em>gift</em>” that they received and no more:  same opportunity and rights as all people are provided in this great nation.</p>
<p>As a person who taught in a public school, I found that most of our students from immigrant families spoke better English, knew more about this country’s history, and had more of an appreciation for being here…than most of the students born to citizens.  So…allow me to ask a very hard question:</p>
<p>If you have forgotten the courage and labors of your immigrant ancestors…</p>
<p>If you have forgotten the derision your immigrant ancestors faced at the hands of bigots and xenophobes who told them to “<em>just go home</em>,” and now heap similar treatment on others…</p>
<p>If, like so many natural-born citizens, you can’t answer the questions on the Naturalization Examination about your own country’s history, government and laws (here is a <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21019797/">small sample</a>)…</p>
<p>If you think you are somehow entitled to be here, to be given a job, to be treated better…</p>
<p>Then, <strong>what kind of American citizen are you?</strong></p>
<p><em>And,</em> isn’t it possible that a Mexican man, who faced great peril to come here…</p>
<p>… so he could provide for his family, and perhaps obtain a better life for his family…</p>
<p>…so he could secure better opportunities for his children…</p>
<p>…isn’t it possible he understands and appreciates more about what America <em>really</em> is…<strong>than you do?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/immigration_issue_look_at_causes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shrinking GOP &#8211; More Exclusion, More Insensitivity</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-shrinking-gop-more-exclusion-more-insensitivity/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-shrinking-gop-more-exclusion-more-insensitivity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audra Shay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diann Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Blunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Myrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusty DePass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Tancredo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent ABC/Washington Post Poll, only 20% of respondents said they would identify themselves as Republicans. While we have certainly examined this trend before, it seems we must keep revisiting it in hopes that everyone will understand the very simple reason behind the GOP's downward spiral: EXCLUSION.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/19/AR2009101902451.html?hpid=topnews"> ABC/Washington Post Poll</a>&#8230;<strong>only 20%</strong> of respondents said they would  identify themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>While we have certainly examined this trend before, it seems we must keep  revisiting it in hopes that, sooner or later, everyone will understand the very  simple reason behind the GOP&#8217;s downward spiral.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>It&#8217;s simple:</strong></span></p>
<p>- <strong>All since January of this year:</strong> A staffer for Tennessee State  Rep. Diane Black (R-Gallatin) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/16/tennessee-gop-staffer-ema_n_216085.html"> sends out a racially insensitive email</a>&#8230;she doesn&#8217;t apologize, and isn&#8217;t  terminated.    Representative Roy Blunt (R-MO) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/roy-blunt-r-mo-tells-raci_b_292260.html"> tells a monkey joke</a> at a the <em>2009 Values Voters Summit</em>&#8230;and then  makes it clear that he&#8217;s talking about President Obama.  Kansas Republican  legislator Bill Otto <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a clip on YouTube</a> called &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he criticizes the  President and then refers to opossum as the &#8220;<strong>other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;   Diann Jones, a Texas GOP official, <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/local/stories/060309dnmetgopemail.4568316.html"> criticized a tax</a> on guns as &#8220;<span><strong>Another terrific  idea from the black house and its minions.</strong>&#8220;  Audra Shay, at the time  running to be head of the Young Republicans, encouraged and laughed along with <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-10/the-gops-young-hatemonger/"> racist jokes on her Facebook page</a> and made her own joke about Obama &#8220;<strong>in a  noose</strong>&#8220;&#8230;even after these comments went public, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">she won the position</span>.   GOP activist Rusty DePass <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/16/michelle-obama-gorilla-co_n_216178.html"> responds to a news story</a> about an escaped gorilla&#8230;joking that it is &#8220;</span><strong>just  one of Michelle&#8217;s ancestors &#8211; probably harmless,</strong>&#8220; and the Republican  Party does not apologize.  The chairman of the RNC, Michael Steele, says  that he is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bil-browning/steele-gop-woos-blacks-wi_b_231534.html"> going to lure African-Americans to the Republican Party</a> with &#8220;<strong>fried  chicken.</strong>&#8221;  When asked why he is the only senior official from Louisiana <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/david-vitter-ducks-questi_n_328478.html"> not to rebuke a judge</a> for refusing to marry an interracial couple, Senator  David Vitter (R-LA) would only respond, &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the case</strong>,&#8221;  then got on an elevator, declining to make further comment.  Don&#8217;t wonder very long why many  of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>40.9 million</strong></span> black people in the United States are not  identifying themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>- <strong>All since January of this year:</strong> Senator Kyl (R-AZ) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/arizona-mothers-storm-kyl_b_313458.html"> says that maternity shouldn&#8217;t be covered</a> by health insurance, because he and  other men &#8220;<em>don&#8217;t need it.</em>&#8220;  Senator Al Franken (D-MN) sponsors his  first bill, which states that government contractors that attempt to force female employees not  to report harassment and rape, should be penalized&#8230;and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/meet-the-senators-who-vot_n_312976.html"> 30 Republican senators</a> vote <strong>AGAINST</strong> it.  Republican Robert F.  McDonnell, the man running to become the governor of Virginia&#8230;wrote a thesis  claiming that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/31/AR2009083103855.html"> women should not work</a>, and should stay in the home, and that government  credits for child care expenses are part of the &#8220;<em>problem</em>.&#8221;  The  National Republican Congressional Committee said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi  (D-CA) should be &#8220;<strong>put in her place</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/female-republicans-fail-t_n_314265.html"> not a single female Republican legislator</a> (<em>or male Republican  legislator, for that matter</em>) was willing to denounce the statement.  No  fewer than three high ranking Republican &#8220;<em>leaders</em>&#8221; are discovered to be  cheating on their wives, brazenly, and are all connected to the bizarre, &#8220;<em>weirdly-Christian</em>,&#8221; <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/jeff-sharlet-reveals-dist_n_241857.html"> C Street house</a>, where it appears infidelity was not only encouraged (<em>using  the justification that as &#8216;men of power,&#8217; they <strong>DESERVED</strong> to do it</em>), but  it was also allowed to occur in the building and was covered up by other members.   Don&#8217;t wonder very long why many of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>150.6 million</strong></span> women in the  United States are not identifying themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>- <strong>All since January of this year:</strong> Former Republican House  Speaker Newt Gingrich <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/03/gingrich-takes-back-sotom_n_210713.html"> called Justice Sonia Sotomayor a racist</a> during the confirmation  hearings&#8230;and another Republican made the &#8220;<em>Ricky Ricardo</em>&#8221; reference that  she&#8217;d have &#8220;<strong>some &#8216;splainin&#8217; to do.</strong>&#8220;  Former GOP congressman Tom  Tancredo <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/29/gop-hispanic-strategists_n_209240.html"> called Sotomayor</a> a member of the &#8220;<strong>Latino KKK</strong>.&#8221;  The RNC <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/09/29/rncs-spanish-translation-of-hispanic-heritage-month-press-release-riddled-with-errors/"> put out a press release</a> for Hispanic Heritage Month that had obviously just  been run through a translator program and was rife with translation,  grammatical, and spelling errors&#8230;and the ad they put out featuring prominent  Hispanics, didn&#8217;t include Justice Sotomayor.  Two RNC officials defended Senator  Jim DeMint&#8217;s failure to &#8220;<em>bring home</em>&#8221; funds to South Carolina&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/gopers-demint-like-a-jew_n_326295.html">by  saying he was just acting</a> like &#8220;<strong>a jew</strong>&#8221; with our country&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>pennies</strong>.&#8221;   Representative Sue Myrick (R-N.C.) <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/63571-rep-myrick-reiterates-call-to-cut-ties-with-cair"> wrote the forward for a new book</a> which claims there is a &#8220;<em>Muslim  conspiracy</em>&#8221; to take over our government, and Myrick and other Republicans  held a press conference to ask the Sergeant Of Arms of the Congress to  investigate any Muslim interns.  <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/08/tea-party-express-roars-to-dc-tour-anticipates-500/"> Republican Representatives and Senators</a> cheered on a Tea Party gathering in  Washington, D.C&#8230;despite the fact that many protesters held sign bearing  anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim, and anti-foreigner slogans and images.  RNC Chair Michael Steele claimed,  ridiculously, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/16/michael-steele-gay-marria_n_204263.html"> that gay marriage would hurt small businesses</a>.  Representative Steve  King (R-IA) said gay marriage <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/24/steve-king-gay-marriage-i_n_298372.html"> is socialism</a>&#8230;and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/06/democrats-accused-of-usin_n_198167.html"> later claimed</a> that the Hate Crimes legislation to protect homosexuals would  protect other, what he called, &#8220;<em>perversions</em>&#8220;&#8230;and then he compared  homosexuality to bestiality, necrophilia, and pedophilia.  Senator Tom  Coburn (R-OK) is now <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/tom-coburn-attempts-to-ge_n_327712.html"> trying to get gays to support him</a> in the fight against health care  reform&#8230;despite the fact that he has called the &#8220;<strong>gay agenda</strong>&#8221; the &#8220;<strong>greatest  threat to our freedom that we face today,</strong>&#8221; and also once said, &#8220;<strong>Lesbianism  is so rampant in some of the schools in southeast Oklahoma that they&#8217;ll only let  one girl go to the bathroom. Now think about it. Think about that issue. How is  it that that&#8217;s happened to us?</strong>&#8220;  Don&#8217;t wonder  very long why many of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>44.3 million</strong></span> Hispanics&#8230;and the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong> 5.5 million</strong></span> Jews&#8230;and the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>8.8 million</strong></span> gay/bisexual/transgendered people&#8230;and the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>6.5 million</strong></span> Muslims in  the United States are not identifying themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>And these incidents&#8230;are just the <strong>SOME</strong> of the <strong>RECENT</strong> ones  involving politicians and other political officials.  I&#8217;m not even  including the race-baiting and fearmongering from the presidential campaign, nor  any of the numerous incidents involving the right-wing media.</p>
<p>In the end&#8230;<em>it&#8217;s simple mathematics</em>.  Each of us was taught in  grade school that America is a &#8220;<strong>melting pot.</strong>&#8220;  The problem is&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">it&#8217;s  not stirred very well</span>.  There are clumps: enclaves of single-race,  single-religion, single-creed people all across this country.  Within those  caches of homogeneity, people often fall into the simple trap of forgetting  that, while within their clique all may share very similar profiles and  opinions&#8230;<em><strong>the rest of the nation varies considerably</strong></em>.  For  example, when you have lived most of your life in a small town or suburb where  everyone is white, goes to the same evangelical church, votes Republican,  watches FOX News, and opposes homosexuality&#8230;it may be hard to imagine that  there are a <strong>VAST</strong> number of American who are not white, go to some other  church (<em>or don&#8217;t attend at all</em>), vote Democrat (<em>or Independent, or not  at all</em>), think only fools watch FOX News, and support (<em>or simply show  tolerance towards</em>) gays.</p>
<p>Those people also live in America, and millions of others representing every possible  race, ethnicity, sexuality, creed, and lifestyle&#8230;and they are full citizens  with full lives, equal rights, and one vote apiece.  And forgetting that  they vote, not just in the polling place but with their wallets, will lead to  the continued withering of the Republican Party.  It&#8217;s <em>simple</em> math&#8230;and <em>simple</em> politics&#8230;and there&#8217;s no excuse for the GOP not  knowing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-shrinking-gop-more-exclusion-more-insensitivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

