<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Representative Bachmann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/representative-bachmann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Hunting Liberals, President King, and Going Rouge</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Sportsmens Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Gaffney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rouge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Spooner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's Friday...and that means it is time for our weekly "Chaos Theory" installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of political topics ranging from the sublime to the sublimely absurd...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Friday&#8230;and that means it is time for our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221;  installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of  political topics ranging from the sublime to the <em>sublimely absurd</em>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and there are always plenty of links, <em>so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Representative Gregg Harper&#8217;s (R-MS) organization, the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus, has been recently called &#8220;<strong>bipartisan</strong>&#8221; by Senator Ben  	Nelson (D-NE).  When 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0910/get_to_know_a_congressman4.html"> asked by Polico&#8217;s reporter</a>, &#8220;<strong>What in the world does the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus do</strong>,&#8221; one might reasonably expect would be an answer along  	the lines of, &#8220;<em>we support the rights and interests of sportsmen, fishermen,  	and hunters, in Congress.</em>&#8220;  What one might <strong>NOT</strong> expect, was Harper&#8217;s  	response: &#8220;<strong>We hunt liberal, tree-hugging Democrats, although it does  	seem like a waste of good ammunition.</strong>&#8220;  Very nice&#8230;very  	responsible&#8230;<em>very</em> bipartisan.</li>
<li>Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN), known most for conspiracy  	theories verging on the truly bizarre, has declared that she will not run  	for the presidency in 2012.  Which makes sense&#8230;since she may not even  	be able to win re-election for the seat she currently holds, as the  	residents of her district have grown more than a bit weary of her  	embarrassing statements, and the negative attention they attract.   	However, Bachmann 	<a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/47697/bachmann-says-no-to-white-house-run-want-rep-steve-king-instead"> did provide an interesting recommendation</a> for who she thinks <strong>SHOULD</strong> run:   	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Representative Steve King (R-IA)</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;she&#8217;s recommending  	the man who brought us such hits as being 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/08/rep-steve-king-lone-vote_n_227866.html"> the only vote</a> against a resolution stating that it was wrong to use  	slaves to build our Capitol,  sponsoring his own resolution &#8220;<strong>recognizing  	the importance of Christians and the Christian faith</strong>,&#8221; and very recently  	stating that gay rights are a &#8220;<strong>purely socialist concept</strong>.&#8221;  Way to  	really think it through, Michele&#8230;he is a <em>winner</em>.</li>
<li>I guess Republicans just <strong>LOVE</strong> Twitter.  	<a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/blogtalk-twitter-and-the-gop/"> It&#8217;s also being reported</a>&#8230;that they love setting up fake Twitter  	accounts and webpages, where they pretend to be particular Democratic  	legislators and candidates.  They then use these fraudulent accounts to  	misinform and offend voters.  Twitter has caught on and is trying to  	close all the accounts being used by Republicans in this way.  I think  	I may know why they like Twitter more than actual blogs:  on Twitter  	nobody expects you to actually use <em>facts</em> and defend your position&#8230;you  	can get  	away with just blurting out a few words of nonsense.</li>
<li>The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee 	<a href="http://dscc.org/gopplan">has put out an ad</a>, claiming that  	Republicans have wasted over 1,000 hours in the Senate, through exploitation  	of parliamentary rules and procedures.  The DSCC does little to show  	how they arrived at this figure&#8230;but I would guess that much of what the  	GOP has fought for in Congress also qualifies as a waste of time.  <em>Need  	examples?</em> This clip, a spoof on the iPhone commercials, has been  	making the internet rounds, and I think it nicely sums up the kinds of  	platforms and positions the GOP is using to distract our attention, delay  	progress, and otherwise hinder real issues from being addressed:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I">www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>A Telling List:</strong> Want to see clips of the &#8220;<em>Top Ten Distortions  	Perpetrated By FOX News?</em>&#8220;  Well look no further than 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/the-ten-most-egregious-fo_n_327140.html"> this link</a>.  It includes such highlights as accusing an Obama czar  	of condoning statutory rape, editing a clip of Joe Biden quoting John  	McCain&#8230;so that it appeared as if Biden said the quote, editing a clip of  	Barack Obama so it appeared that he supported a European-style health care  	system&#8230;when he was actually opposing the idea, <strong>AND</strong> directly repeating,  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">verbatim</span>, GOP talking points as if they were news.  <em>Enjoy</em>&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 1:</strong> A Hollywood charity is mounting a push to  	encourage more Americans to volunteer.  Since Obama has also supported  	volunteerism as important, Glenn Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/glenn-beck-slams-obama-en_n_326632.html"> could only imagine one thing</a>:  That Obama is using Hollywood&#8230;<em>to  	turn us into Communist China</em>.  No, I&#8217;m serious&#8230;here&#8217;s what he said: &#8220;<strong>Celebrities  	are coming together to make it cool to volunteer. Disney gives you a free  	day at the park. This is all fine, but doesn&#8217;t it seem a little bit  	convenient that all of this comes out now at the same time the Obama  	administration is calling for it? Obama controls the message through the  	media he holds in his pocket. Or in his little hand. And soon if you  	disobey, he&#8217;ll just go [Beck slaps his hand]. Now the message will be  	embedded in television shows. Isn&#8217;t this great? Aren&#8217;t you proud of what  	we&#8217;re doing? Oh, this certainly is change.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 2:</strong> Why is it that every time I write about  	something Glenn Beck said, I feel the need to also say, &#8220;<em>No really&#8230;that&#8217;s  	what he said?</em>&#8220;  Well, Beck was busy this week providing more ammunition  	for whomever is filling out the civil commitment papers on him, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/glenn-beck-smears-progres_n_327860.html"> claiming</a> that progressives/liberals&#8230;<em>wait for it</em>&#8230;have historically  	tried to take away everyone&#8217;s individual liberties, and could also be called  	&#8220;<strong>tyrants</strong>&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>slave holders</strong>.&#8221;  &lt;&lt;Sigh&gt;&gt;&#8230;</li>
<li>Neocon Frank Gaffney has claimed in the past that Obama was some sort of  	&#8220;s<em>ecret Muslim</em>,&#8221; that there is evidence connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and  	the Oklahoma City bombing (<em>there isn&#8217;t, of course, and shame on you if you  	didn&#8217;t know that</em>), that Sarah Palin learned foreign policy just by <em>living</em> in  	Alaska, that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (<em>but that the  	media hid this &#8220;fact&#8221; from us</em>), and that Democratic officials who criticized  	former President George W. Bush&#8230;should be hanged.  I tell you all  	this&#8230;so it will be of no surprise that Gaffney has no more decency than he  	has sense.  In a recent appearance on Hardball with Chris Matthews, he  	told Ron Reagan&#8230;<strong>that his father would be ashamed of him:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>John Stossel of the FOX Business Channel recently condemned Lou Dobbs&#8217;,  	of CNN, for Dobb&#8217;s ongoing &#8220;<strong>rants about immigrants wrecking America.</strong>&#8220;   	Dobbs has now responded, and rather unkindly: &#8220;<strong>Fox Business News  	- their new hire John Stossel -- weighing in  		with his own brand of myopic idiocy and no information whatsoever sat  		down with self-described rodeo clown Glenn Beck…what a self-important  		ass</strong><strong>…He doesn’t understand basic economics…He’s just a silly  	little trick waiting to do some sort of Libertarian flip&#8230;Immigrants wrecking America  	-  I’ve never said anything close to that.  		As a matter of fact, I embrace immigrants to this country, I welcome  		them, I want more -- and as a matter of public policy, we need them. </strong> <strong>In no way am I restrictionist, and to hear this ass continue his  		act over at Fox News. I just can’t wait until he starts blowing bubbles  		in the air -- that’s about all he’s equipped to do.</strong>&#8220;   	That&#8217;s right Lou, you never said the &#8220;<em>immigrants are wrecking America</em>&#8220;&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">except  	the time</a> you accused them of bringing leprosy here&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">or the  	time</a> you claimed they were forming a conspiracy to take back their old  	national territory&#8230;oh, and 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/"> remember the time</a> you said they were a threat to the entire middle  	class, and working people everywhere?  Dobbs&#8230;before you start trying  	to play &#8220;<em>friend to the immigrant</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>holier than thou</em>&#8221; with John Stossel&#8230;you  	might want to watch some your own clips on YouTube.</li>
<li>How better to wrap up the &#8220;<em>Media Gone Wild</em>&#8221; segment of the post, than  	with an Ann Coulter item.  During her appearance on Joy Behar&#8217;s talk  	show, she stated that all Presidential assassins have been liberals: &#8220;<strong>As  	I have not only witnessed in my own life but described in &#8216;Guilty&#8217;, every  	presidential assassination or attempted presidential assassination was  	committed by some kind of left-wing loon, communist, anarchist,  	communitarian, or they had no politics at all.</strong>&#8220;  Behar attempts to  	point out that this statement is indefensible and patently false&#8230;but Ms.  	Coulter has never been the one to stop talking so that someone else can  	point out <strong>HOW WRONG SHE IS</strong>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>COURTESY OF THE PENTAGON AND THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Apparently, there are at least 220 detainees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval  	Prison&#8230;which have been found to have had no ties to terrorism, 9/11, or to  	pose any other kind of threat to the United States&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>but we&#8217;re still keeping  	them in prison</strong></span>.  The Supreme Court 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/guantanamo-uighurs-rights_n_327027.html"> is preparing to look at this problem</a>&#8230;yet another in a list of how  	Bush&#8217;s use of the military prison conflicts with seemingly <strong>EVERY</strong> aspect of  	Due Process listed in our Constitution.  <em>A reminder:</em> the  	base/prison is technically &#8220;<em>American soil</em>&#8221; and the Constitution does not say  	that it applies only to &#8220;<em>citizens</em>&#8221; but rather to all &#8220;<strong>persons</strong>.&#8221;  On a  	related note, a group called <em>New Security Action</em>, with the support of a  	number of retired generals and other veterans, 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYN6yeRWYbI&amp;feature=player_embedded"> has released a series of ads</a> pointing out that Congress should step  	aside and allow Gitmo, which has come to represent nearly everything wrong  	about the Bush-Cheney way of thinking, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">to be closed</span>.</li>
<li><strong>No surprise:</strong> Turns out the Pentagon was engaged in a highly  	organized program to sell the American people on the Iraq War and other Bush  	security policies.  <strong>Big surprise:</strong> Well&#8230;it wasn&#8217;t so much an &#8220;<em>ad  	campaign</em>&#8221; or a &#8220;<em>public relations program</em>&#8220;&#8230;as it was 	<a href="http://rawstory.com/2009/10/bryan-whitman-2/">a series of  	psychological experiments</a> being performed on the American citizenry.   	<strong>Bonus surprise:</strong> One of the chief architects of this program?  He  	still works at the Pentagon in the same position.  Scully&#8230;Mulder&#8230;<em>where  	are you when we need you?</em></li>
<li>Most people were a bit surprised at the unmitigated gall of the 30  	Senate Republicans who voted against Senator Franken&#8217;s (D-MN) bill, which  	would punish government contractors if they tried to keep employees from  	reporting rape.  Turns out, <em>they&#8217;ve got company</em> -- the Defense  	Department 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/defense-department-oppose_n_326569.html"> also doesn&#8217;t like the bill</a>&#8230;because they would hate to have to do  	without KBR, Blackwater, and other companies that threaten/coerce/bribe  	victims of rape to be silent.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Amidst all the talk about a &#8220;<em>public option</em>,&#8221; few are paying  	attention to a development almost as big.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/senate-dems-aim-to-strip_n_328362.html"> Democrats are very close</a> to being able to strip away the anti-trust  	exemption given long ago to the health insurance companies, which has  	allowed them to behave as a monopoly.  Want to know why this is so  	important?  We know how the free market is <strong>SUPPOSED</strong> to  	work&#8230;but when a company is allowed to monopolize an industry or a region,  	then there is no competition to force the company to have fair pricing and  	offer good service&#8230;which leads to our situation today where the health  	insurance companies have high rates, giant profits, deny service, and  	mistreat customers.  Also&#8230;<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/health_competition_map.html">check  	out this map</a>.  <strong>Yes, it&#8217;s disgusting:</strong> most states&#8217; residents, 	<strong>RIGHT NOW</strong>, only have <strong>ONE</strong> or <strong>TWO</strong> insurers that they are 	<strong>ALLOWED</strong> to choose from.  &#8220;<em>Free Market Capitalists</em>&#8220;&#8230;are  	you listening?</li>
<li>First it was &#8220;<em>fat babies</em>.&#8221;  Then it was &#8220;<em>thin babies</em>.&#8221;   	Then it was &#8220;<em>spousal abuse</em>.&#8221;  What new excuse for denying  	coverage did we find out about now?  Yup&#8230;insurance companies, almost  	all of them, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/insurance-companies-rape-_n_328708.html"> will not allow you to purchase a policy</a> with them if you have been  	treated for <strong>RAPE</strong>.  To them&#8230;it&#8217;s just another &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>The push for the public option is in full swing, and polls show it is  	working.  More of the public supports it each day, the House is within  	about <strong>EIGHT</strong> votes of being able to pass it, and we heard the 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/23/reid-is-only-one-or-two-v_n_331652.html"> surprising news</a> today that the Senate may be within <strong>TWO</strong> votes.  	<em>Seriously</em>: <strong>TWO VOTES</strong>.  Here&#8217;s a new ad, featuring Heather  	Graham, explaining why the option is necessary:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70">www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Interesting fact courtesy of Representative Anthony Weiner (D-NY):</span> <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/10/23/weiner-calls-gop-opponents-public-option-give-up-their-medicare"> 55 of the Republicans</a> opposing the public option because it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>government-run</em>&#8221;  	or &#8220;<em>socialism</em>&#8220;&#8230;they&#8217;re currently <strong>ON</strong> <strong>MEDICARE</strong>.   	Weiner says, &#8220;<strong>Even in a town known for hypocrisy, this list of 55 Members  	of Congress deserve some sort of prize. They apparently think the public  	option is ok for them, but not anyone else.</strong>&#8220;  Yes, indeed.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GAY RIGHTS&#8230;OR THE LACK THEREOF:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wow</strong>:  It&#8217;s rare that someone actually <strong>ADMITS</strong> that their argument  	against gay rights and/or gay marriage is hollow and baseless.  Ross Douthat,  	conservative columnist for the New York Times, was asked while sitting on a  	panel for &#8220;<em>young, bright, neo-cons</em>&#8221; what he thought about gay marriage.  	<a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/media/n1-panel-cat-got-douthats-tongue-topic-gay-marriage"> His response</a>:  &#8220;<strong>I am someone opposed to gay marriage who is  	deeply uncomfortable arguing the issue in public.</strong>&#8220;  He explained  	that his reason for feeling &#8220;<strong>uncomfortable</strong>&#8221; discussing the subject,  	was because his argument against it is purely religious, and that it  	therefore represents &#8220;<strong>a losing argument.</strong>&#8220;  He even went so far  	as to recognize that because he is embarrassed that he has no real, factual  	objection to gay marriage&#8230;and because he is embarrassed to say what his  	objection really is&#8230;perhaps that means he needs to change his position and  	support gay marriage.  <em>Wow.  Again&#8230;wow.</em></li>
<li>Related to the previous item, a mailing sent out in Maine is attempting  	to persuade residents of the state to vote &#8220;<em>Yes</em>&#8221; in the upcoming ballot item  	to prohibit gay marriage.  The reasons that it proposes? I happen to  	have FiveThirtyEight.com&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/10/arguments-against-gay-marriage.html"> summations of the reasons</a>&#8230;first, the mailing claims that the new law  	permitting gay marriage &#8220;<strong>won&#8217;t make gay marriage equal to straight  	marriage. Instead, it will create a new kind of marriage in which gay people  	and straight people are equal.</strong>&#8220;  Well, besides not making much  	sense&#8230;that&#8217;s certainly not going to &#8220;<em>stir up</em>&#8221; too many people.   	The second reason it offers: &#8220;<strong>&#8230;we may not have proven any connection  	between gay marriage and public education, our opponents haven&#8217;t disproven  	the connection, and it&#8217;s their fault that the subject came up.</strong>&#8220;   	Impressive&#8230;that doesn&#8217;t really say anything, does it.  I mean, it  	sounds like it&#8217;s saying something&#8230;but then it just&#8230;doesn&#8217;t.  And  	third, the mailing offers that, &#8220;<strong>if gay marriage is upheld, then marriage  	will exist solely to make people happy.</strong>&#8220;  Well,  	it&#8217;s hard to see how that&#8217;s true&#8230;would gay people marrying suddenly make  	heterosexual marriages &#8220;<em>meaningless</em>&#8221; and about nothing more than &#8220;<em>happiness</em>?&#8221;   	And hell, I know some people who will tell you that marriage has nothing to  	do with happiness at all&#8230;I&#8217;m sure they were just kidding&#8230;</li>
<li><em>Meet Philip Spooner:</em> Want to hear a86-year-old  	man&#8230;lifelong Republican&#8230;and WWII veteran who fought on D-Day&#8230;defend  	gay marriage with all his heart?  <em>Yeah, me too:</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Despite the calls from Republicans that protecting gay Americans was the  	equivalent of protecting practitioners of  <em>pedophilia, bestiality,  	and necrophilia</em>&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/22/hate-crimes-bill-approved_n_330702.html">the  	new Hate Crimes Bill has passed</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The Nation, a well-known progressive magazine, 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28609.html">is publishing</a> a &#8220;<em>companion piece</em>&#8221; to Sarah Palin&#8217;s new book, &#8220;<em>Going Rogue</em>.&#8221;  It&#8217;s  	titled &#8220;<em>Going Rouge</em>&#8221; and features an almost identical cover, to match the  	almost identical title.  Some conservatives have complained that this  	might lead to some people purchasing The Nation&#8217;s book by mistake.   	Perhaps they&#8217;re right&#8230;seeing as both books will likely be placed next to  	each other on a shelve in the &#8220;<em>Humor</em>&#8221; section&#8230;and due to the fact that  	many of the people seeking Palin&#8217;s book might not know how &#8220;<em>rogue</em>&#8221; is  	properly spelled.</li>
</ul>
<p>That about wraps it up for this week in Reality Liberation.  Have a  wonderful weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Grayson&#8217;s Charge, Sex Clinics, and the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Behar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shepard Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the weekly "Chaos Theory" edition of the RLF blog...where I quickly attempt to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition of the RLF blog&#8230;where I quickly attempt  to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the  week.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Most people hadn&#8217;t heard of Representative Alan Grayson (R-FL)  	before&#8230;but they have <span style="text-decoration: underline;">now</span>.  In a wonderful, congressional, &#8220;<em>oh,  	no you didn&#8217;t</em>&#8221; moment&#8230;Grayson laid out in simple terms the terrible  	truth about the Republicans on Health Care Reform:  tens of thousands  	of Americans are dying because they don&#8217;t have insurance&#8230;and the  	Republicans have offered <strong>NOTHING</strong> but opposition to changing  	this&#8230;therefore, they must just want people to just &#8220;<em>not get sick</em>&#8221;  	and if they do&#8230;they should &#8220;<em>die quickly:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco">www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course, the Republican backlash to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/alan-grayson-republicans_n_303996.html"> Grayson&#8217;s statements</a> was fast and furious, and they demanded an  	immediate apology, comparing what Grayson did to the actions of Senator Joe  	&#8220;<em>You Lie!</em>&#8221; Wilson&#8230;despite the fact that the two events have nothing  	in common, especially in terms of congressional procedures and policies  	regarding decorum.  Grayson&#8230;complied, <em>but not in the way the GOP  	expected</em>:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/grayson-not-backing-down_n_305196.html"> he apologized</a>, not to the GOP, but to the dead and the dying and to  	their families&#8230;he apologized for Congress allowing this to happen.   	So far, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/pelosi-grayson-shouldnt-a_n_306338.html"> Pelosi has backed Grayson</a>, along with the rest of the Democrats&#8230;and  	now some 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/dems-taunt-gop-wheres-you_n_307560.html"> Democrats seem to be realizing</a>: &#8220;<em>Wait a minute&#8230;the GOP really <strong> HAVEN&#8217;T</strong> offered a plan&#8230;we should point that out!</em>&#8220;  No kidding  	guys&#8230;that one was a gimme.</li>
<li>Want the very definition of &#8220;<em>out of touch?</em>&#8220;  House Minority  	Leader John Boehner (R-OH)&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1009/Boehner_searching_for_first_public_option_backer.html?showall">says  	nobody has ever approached him</a> supporting the public option and he  	therefore doesn&#8217;t think most people support it.  Ummm, John&#8230;the  	majority of people in <strong>YOUR STATE</strong> support it&#8230;the <strong>VAST</strong> majority of the 	<a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693"> people in the country</a> support it and 	<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-HealthcareReform/idUSTRE58T0MY20090930"> would be willing to pay higher taxes to pay for it</a>&#8230;and unless you,  	Snowe, and some of the Democratic Senators who voted against it in the  	Senate Finance Committee realize that the majority of your constituents want  	it&#8230;well, there will be obvious political consequences come reelection  	time.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator David Vitter (R-LA) 	<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/60699-prostitution-complaint-filed-against-vitter"> has some new problems</a>&#8230;stemming from his old problems.  It&#8217;s been  	very odd to watch a Senator, busted for soliciting prostitutes, question the  	morality of Democrats and claim that he and other southern Republicans are  	the ones representing &#8220;<strong>true values.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps he mistakenly  	believed that the scandal was behind him&#8230;well, &#8220;<em>not so</em>&#8221; says the  	Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel.  Apparently (<em>who knew?</em>),  	soliciting prostitutes just might violate the State&#8217;s laws regarding  	professional misconduct for a lawyer.  The law states that lawyers may  	be charged with misconduct and subsequently disbarred if they &#8220;<strong>commit a  	criminal act especially one that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty,  	trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.</strong>&#8220;  Ooops.</li>
<li>The Health Care bill contains a provision for health clinics to be  	established in schools, since studies show that access to health services  	can greatly increase academic performance.  This gave Representative  	Michele Bachmann (R-MN) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/bachmann-sex-clinics-will_n_306292.html"> all that she needed</a> to formulate a new &#8220;<em>anti-reform</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theory.  Bachmann tells us&#8230;that these would actually be &#8220;<strong>sex  	clinics</strong>&#8221; where kids could go to get <strong>ABORTIONS</strong> without their  	parents knowing about it: &#8220;<strong>The bill goes on to say what&#8217;s going to go on  	-- comprehensive primary health services, physicals, treatment of minor  	acute medical conditions, referrals to follow-up for specialty care &#8212; is  	that abortion? Does that mean that someone&#8217;s 13 year-old daughter could walk  	into a sex clinic, have a pregnancy test done, be taken away to the local  	Planned Parenthood abortion clinic, have their abortion, be back and go home  	on the school bus that night? Mom and dad are never the wiser.</strong>&#8220;  Of  	course&#8230;Michelle only read item (II) under section 2511 of the bill&#8230;if  	she had bothered to read item (I) RIGHT BEFORE IT she would have known that  	the bills says: &#8220;<strong>SBHC services will be provides in accordance with  	Federal, State, and local laws governing-- (I) obtaining parental or  	guardian consent; and (II) patient privacy and student records, including  	section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of  	1996 and section 444 of the General Education Provision Act;</strong>&#8220;  Your  	choice: bad reader&#8230;or just a liar?</li>
<li>Governor Sanford of South Carolina&#8230;having been asked by both his  	fellow Republicans and his constituents to resign over his actions regarding  	the abandonment of his duties to pursue an illicit affair&#8230;<a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/965644.html">now  	asks that the state ethics panel doesn&#8217;t release its findings</a>.  <em> I wonder why</em>.  Hear that sound?  It&#8217;s the sound of Sanford&#8217;s  	fingernails dragging across the State of South Carolina&#8230;clinging on like  	grim death so that he can stay in office <em>for just a little bit longer</em>.</li>
<li>The &#8220;<em>Republican</em>&#8221; brand name?  	<a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/assessing_the_gop_brand.php">Not  	doing so hot</a>&#8230;and given the types of things I&#8217;m reading and posting  	each week, this should surprise <strong>NO ONE</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA:  PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity is so consistently wrong in terms of his facts and  	historical data, that Jon Stewart was able to dedicate almost a third of one 	<em>Daily Show</em> episode&#8230;just to pointing out Hannity&#8217;s <strong>RECENT</strong> mistakes.  I submit this clip for your enjoyment and edification:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Bernard Goldberg, a media critic, usually appears on FOX shows&#8230;to <strong> DEFEND</strong> the network against the constant stream of accusations that they  	have an obvious, right-wing bias.  So&#8230;you can imagine that people  	were a bit shocked to see him appearing on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor, and  	saying&#8230;that in many ways, FOX is to be held responsible for creating this  	perception, especially when it does things like &#8220;<em>promoting</em>&#8221; Tea Party  	protests rather than simply &#8220;<em>reporting on</em>&#8221; Tea Party protests:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Once again, Shepard Smith, host of FOX&#8217;s &#8220;<em>The Fox Report</em>&#8221; has  	chosen to speak the truth rather than simply parrot the talking points.   	On a recent segment, a guest tried to levy criticisms at the current Health  	Care Reform proposals&#8230;by pointing out that Canada&#8217;s single-payer system is  	less than perfect.  Shepard is quick to point out that it seems like a  	false and deceptive comparison, since <strong>NONE</strong> of the bills in Congress  	propose a single-payer system.  When Shepard&#8217;s guest then tries to  	create a classic &#8220;<em>straw man</em>&#8220;/&#8221;<em>slippery slope</em>&#8221; argument&#8230;Shepard  	wasn&#8217;t going to allow that either.  <strong>Good for you Shep:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/sen-graham-calls-beck-a-c_n_306434.html"> at a recent discussion</a> in front of powerful Washington &#8220;<em>movers and  	shakers,</em>&#8221; came right out and said that the &#8220;<em>birther</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theorists are &#8220;<strong>crazy</strong>,&#8221; that Obama is certainly not a &#8220;<em>closet  	Muslim</em>,&#8221; and that Glenn Beck &#8220;<strong>is not aligned with any party. He is  	aligned with cynicism and there has always been a market for cynics. But we  	became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a  	great nation because we are a nation of believers.</strong>&#8220;  Wow&#8230;could  	there finally be a Republican who might realize that the votes you get from  	siding with the extremists&#8230;<strong>ARE NOT WORTH IT</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OLYMPIC FLAME&#8230;FIZZLES:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Even after President Obama flew to Denmark to make the case for the 2016  	Summer Olympics to be held in Chicago&#8230;<a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/33138973/ns/sports-olympic_sports/">the  	prize went to someone else</a>.  In a shocking turn of events, Chicago  	didn&#8217;t even make it past the first round of voting&#8230;Tokyo would fall in the  	next round&#8230;and at the end Rio de Janeiro won over Madrid the right to host  	the games.</li>
<li>In a display that can only be described as exceedingly puerile,  	conservative commentators/columnists including RedState&#8217;s Erick Erickson,  	Michelle Malkin, and Rush Limbaugh have been, quite literally, <strong> CELEBRATING</strong> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/conservatives-revel-in-ob_n_307794.html"> the fact that America will not be hosting the 2016 games</a>&#8230;simply  	because it allows them to claim that &#8220;<em>Obama failed at something.</em>&#8220;  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">That&#8217;s right:</span> Conservatives are <strong>CELEBRATING</strong>, during an  	economic crisis, that America will <strong>NOT</strong> get the projected $22 billion  	in revenues, the 315,000 new jobs, and the $11 billion in new income that  	those jobs represent.  They&#8217;re willing to cheer against the best  	interests of the country&#8230;if it means a &#8220;<em>failure</em>&#8221; for the President.   	Remember this, when listening to these same people discuss Health Care  	Reform, or anything else:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">these people would rather America suffers</span>&#8230;as  	long as it denies Obama check in the &#8220;<em>win</em>&#8221; column.</li>
<li>While the President was unable to convince the voting members of the IOC  	to permit the games to be held in America&#8230;top White House Advisor David  	Axlerod is correct at saying 	<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/02/axelrod-blames-chicago-loss-on-ioc-politics/"> there is more involved</a> than the President&#8217;s charm.  It&#8217;s a well  	established fact that the IOC is an extremely political body, and that its  	voting process often produces unexpected results.  In recent years, the  	IOC has come under increasing pressure to allow the games to be hosted in a  	country <strong>OTHER</strong> than the United States, the nations of Europe, and the  	countries comprising Asia&#8230;and preferably a South American country.   	Given this pressure, the decision to hand the honor over to Rio de Janeiro,  	Brazil&#8230;<em>starts to make more sense</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PALINWATCH -- HOW CAN WE MISS HER IF SHE WON&#8217;T GO AWAY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Politico&#8217;s recent polls suggest that ex-Governor Sarah Palin 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/palinmap/index.html">is not well regarded  	among her fellow Republicans</a>, Republican advisors 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/mccain-campaign-manager-p_n_307523.html"> consider her to be</a> &#8220;<em>electoral poison</em>,&#8221; and many of her former  	supporters either tired of her during the Levy/Bristol business, or don&#8217;t  	respect her resigning the governorship before completing her term&#8230;but 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26236.html">there is  	still a demographic</a> that absolutely <strong>LOVES</strong> her:  Evangelical  	Christians, and Republicans living in small, country towns&#8230;and of course, 	<strong>there&#8217;s some overlap between those two groups</strong>.  I don&#8217;t think I  	even need to say anything else on the subject&#8230;draw your own conclusions.</li>
<li>The New York Post reports that Palin&#8217;s new career as a &#8220;<em>highly paid  	speaker</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/sarah_lectures_tough_sell_Z6eKRnldUitBmiOfXCBjlI"> is not going so hot</a>&#8230;perhaps due to the limited number of people (<em>mentioned  	in the previous item</em>) who still think she&#8217;s &#8220;<em>bright</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>adorable</em>.&#8221;   	In fact, one industry expert told the Post: &#8220;<strong>The big lecture buyers in  	the US are paralyzed with fear about booking her, basically because they  	think she is a blithering idiot&#8230;Palin is so uninteresting to so many  	groups -- unless they are interested in moose hunting.  What does she  	have to say? She can&#8217;t even describe what she reads.</strong>&#8220;  And as with  	the previous item&#8230;I really can&#8217;t think of anything that I need to add to  	that.</li>
<li>In a surprise move&#8230;perhaps due to her inability to book speaking gigs  	at $100,000 a pop&#8230;it was announced that 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090928/ap_on_en_ot/us_books_palin"> Palin&#8217;s memoir would be released</a> November 17, which is four months ahead  	of schedule.  The announcement regarding the book&#8217;s title generated  	even more surprised looks: &#8220;<strong>Going Rogue -- An American Life.</strong>&#8220;  It  	seemed strange to some&#8230;that Palin would want to reference &#8220;<em>going rogue</em>,&#8221;  	as it was a comment that McCain campaign insiders made referring to how  	Palin&#8217;s off-book, off-message, inconsistent, and completely unprepared  	remarks were <strong>TANKING MCCAIN&#8217;S PRESIDENTIAL BID</strong>.  In other  	words&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">it wasn&#8217;t meant as a compliment</span>.  Pre-orders for the  	book 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/09/30/palin-already-a-bestselle_0_ws_304937.html"> suggest very brisk sales</a>, causing some on the left to ascribe to a  	conspiracy theory that conservative groups and churches must be buying up  	the books in large numbers to increase the sales figures.  In  	reality&#8230;people just need to realize that not everybody who buys the book  	necessarily admires Sarah Palin&#8230;many will get it just for the likely  	entertainment value, the same way millions of people each day go out on  	YouTube and watch people ride bicycles into walls, fall off skateboards, and  	slip and fall while dancing.</li>
<li>Want a good laugh?  Here&#8217;s Ann Coulter, appearing on Joy Behar&#8217;s  	new show on CNN&#8230;asserting that the effect of Sarah Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>death panel</strong>&#8221;  	tweet shows that Palin is &#8220;<strong>a powerful woman</strong>&#8221; and that people listen  	to her because she is so &#8220;<strong>coherent</strong>.&#8221; Joy&#8230;took particular exception  	to the &#8220;<em>coherent</em>&#8221; part.  Many more excepts may be viewed 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxdq9PUQtTg">here</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember Valerie Plame?  The undercover CIA agent whose identity  	was leaked to the press after her husband criticized the Bush  	administration?  Remember the Bush administration agreeing to &#8220;chat&#8221;  	with investigators, but not on the record or under oath&#8230;and how Scooter  	Libby was eventually &#8220;<em>volunteered</em>&#8221; to take the fall for leaking the  	information, despite the fact that conventional wisdom suggested it was Vice  	President Cheney&#8217;s idea?  Thursday, a federal judge, against the wishes  	of both the Bush and Obama administrations, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/cheney-fbi-interview-must_n_306329.html"> ruled that the FBI&#8217;s notes of their interview</a> with Cheney must be  	publicly released.  This could be embarrassing&#8230;on the upside, if  	Cheney&#8217;s statements are embarrassing/incriminating enough, maybe he&#8217;ll  	finally stop appearing on talk shows.  <em>Fingers crossed&#8230;</em></li>
<li>Just last week, I was criticizing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for  	not being assertive enough, in terms of getting Senate Democrats to do  	what&#8217;s right and not &#8220;<em>what&#8217;s best for insurance companies.</em>&#8220;   	Apparently, Reid <strong>HAS</strong> grown enough of a backbone to send letters to  	President Obama and Secretary of Defense Gates&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/reid-appeals-directly-to_n_305784.html">asking  	them to finally step up</a> and lend their support to the fight to repeal  	the military&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell</strong>&#8221; policy, which is causing  	highly trained interpreters, war heroes, technical experts, and other brave  	soldiers/sailors/airmen, to be discharged from the armed services&#8230;just for  	being gay.  Reid wrote, &#8220;<strong>As Congress considers future legislative  	action, we believe it would be helpful to hear your views on the policy,&#8221; he  	writes. &#8220;Your leadership in this matter is greatly appreciated and needed at  	this time</strong>,&#8221; and then goes on to include stories of highly valuable and  	distinguished soldiers being discharged under the policy.  Obama has  	voiced his opposition to both DADT and DOMA (<em>The Defense of Marriage Act</em>)&#8230;but  	so far his administration has done more to squelch challenges to the various  	anti-gay rights policies and laws, than it has done to repeal them.  At  	a minimum, they should be lending their support to Senator Kirsten  	Gillibrand (D-NY), who has been fighting the good fight in the Senate.</li>
<li>Turns out that the Secret Service&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33120229">investigation of the Facebook  	user</a> who created a poll asking if the President &#8220;<strong>should be killed</strong>,&#8221;  	has identified a juvenile as the perpetrator.  No charges will be  	filed&#8230;but many are missing the obvious topic for discussion:  while  	the poll may not have represented a viable threat to the President, doesn&#8217;t  	it say something when the tone of our national discourse has become <strong>SO</strong> irrational, <strong>SO</strong> violent, <strong>SO</strong> hateful&#8230;that a child asks such a  	terrible question?  Glenn, Michelle, Rush, Sean, Ann, Bill, and  	others&#8230;<em>won&#8217;t you please think of the children?</em></li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s all from the Reality Liberation Front for this week -- have a good  weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten: Most Ridiculous Things I Read Today</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/top-ten-most-ridiculous-things-i-read-today/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/top-ten-most-ridiculous-things-i-read-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Ferro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Sparkman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census worker hanged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbysists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roving wiretaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes...it's overwhelming.  I go out to the various news outlets looking for interesting items to present here, and I just can't believe how many stories simply defy belief.  Things our elected officials say...things our fellow citizens do...things that the media tells us...things the American people believe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes&#8230;it&#8217;s overwhelming.  I go out to the various news outlets  looking for interesting items to present here, and I just can&#8217;t believe how many  stories <em>simply defy belief</em>.  Things our elected officials  say&#8230;things our fellow citizens do&#8230;things that the media tells us&#8230;things  the American people believe.</p>
<p>To give you an idea of what often makes me so incredulous&#8230;here&#8217;s just a  simple list of the top ten ridiculous and disconcerting things I read about <strong> JUST TODAY</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>1 &#8211; Economics with Caribou Barbie:</strong> Wednesday, former Alaska governor  and former VP candidate Sarah Palin performed her first paid speaking appearance  since resigning as governor, in Hong Kong, for an investment firm.  While  the press was not allowed at the gathering, smuggled-in recording devices  quickly allowed the contents of her speech to be analyzed.  It is not  surprising that she spoke for 90 minutes (<em>although it is arguably surprising  that anyone would listen for that long</em>).  It is not surprising that she  made repeated references to &#8220;<strong>Main Street, U.S.A.</strong>&#8221; and tried to play up  her &#8220;<em>down-homey-ness</em>.&#8221;  It&#8217;s not even surprising that, despite  claims during the Bush administration by her and other Republicans that it is  unacceptable to criticize the president while on foreign soil&#8230;she did <strong>JUST</strong> that.  What is surprising&#8230;is her claim that the current financial  crisis&#8230;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125368057547633229.html">is  the result of &#8220;government intervention&#8221;</a> and that <strong>THAT</strong> is the reason  why it cannot be solved by government intervention.  When economists  stopped laughing they were quick to point out&#8230;that the crisis was caused by  the systematic removal of government controls and regulation that has been  taking place since the Reagan administration, and by necessity&#8230;those controls  (as well as new ones) must be put back into place.</p>
<p><strong>2 &#8211; It&#8217;s Not News&#8230;It&#8217;s FOX News:</strong> Ratings are out&#8230;despite  repeatedly being caught directly parroting RNC talking points&#8230;being caught  inciting and sponsoring so-called &#8220;<em>grass roots</em>&#8221; protests&#8230;besides being  clearly identified as allowing their pundits to use their network as a platform  for conspiracy theories, racist sentiments, and wildly false claims&#8230;besides  brazenly presenting right-wing biased &#8220;<em>news</em>&#8220;&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/22/fox-news-ratings-remain-s_n_295255.html">FOX  News placed ahead of all other cable news outlets</a> with an average of  1,405,000 daily viewers.  By comparison, CNN was 21st on the list with  552,000 viewers.  FOX News was 4th, after Nickelodeon, ESPN, and  USA&#8230;revealing the priorities of Americans to be <strong>cartoons, sports, bad tv  dramas, and pandering to base instincts&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">in that order</span></strong>.</p>
<p><strong>3 &#8211; This Just In From Bizarro-land:</strong> Orly Taitz, the &#8220;<em>attorney</em>&#8221;  filing numerous claims (<em>including two forged Kenyan birth certificates</em>)  questioning Obama&#8217;s citizenship&#8230;has had her latest case thrown out of court by  the judge <a href="http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/breaking_news/story/841419.html"> who threatened Taitz with sanctions</a> if there are further &#8220;<strong>frivolous</strong>&#8221;  claims and said that she &#8220;<strong>&#8230;has presented no credible evidence and has made  no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory  allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as  president of the United States.  Instead, she uses her complaint as a  platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the president  is &#8216;an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.</strong>&#8220;   Turns out&#8230;Taitz was representing a client&#8230;<em>without the client&#8217;s permission</em>.   The supposed client, Connie Rhodes, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/60122/orly-taitzs-client-files-a-complaint-against-her"> says in a formal letter of complaint</a> that she was never asked for permission  by Taitz to file the legal suit&#8230;and never gave it.  Rhodes also writes in  the same letter that she plans to file a complaint with the bar association.   Taitz&#8230;<em>wait for it</em>&#8230;<a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/taitz_client_letter_renouncing_me_may_be_forgery.php?ref=fpb">thinks  the Rhodes letter is a forgery</a>.</p>
<p><strong>4 -</strong> <strong>They Want To Believe: </strong>I don&#8217;t know what is more  disappointing:  the above piece&#8230;or <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_9231210.pdf"> the recent study</a> by Public Policy Polling that shows that 42% of  Republicans&#8230;believe that Obama wasn&#8217;t born in the United States.</p>
<p><strong>5 &#8211; Delay&#8230;Delay&#8230;Oh Good, More Delay:</strong> By now, you may have hear  that the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s version of the Health Care bill is bogged  down as they go through the &#8220;<em>mark up</em>&#8221; process, where the approximately  500 amendments to the bill (<em>which are often times ridiculous to the point of  being bad comedy</em>) have to be individually examined and voted upon.   While the clear intention of Republicans on the committee appears to be to &#8220;<em>stall  the bill to death</em>,&#8221; <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/23/roberts-72-hours-insurance/"> Senator Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) was more obvious than most in his tactics</a>.   He has called for a &#8220;<em>three day delay</em>&#8220;&#8230;so that <strong>LOBBYISTS</strong> can read  the bill.  This is amusing for two reasons:  one&#8230;he is brazenly  stating both his intention to cause delay <strong>AND</strong> to serve the lobbyists&#8217;  interests.  And two&#8230;it is obvious in reading the Finance Committee&#8217;s  version of the bill, that the <strong>LOBBYISTS WROTE IT</strong>, and are therefore  already quite knowledgeable regarding its contents.  Jay Rockefeller (D-W.VA) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/24/rockefeller-the-insurance_n_298555.html"> pointed out</a> that these delays, and the inexplicable content of many of the  amendments, show that &#8220;<strong>If there&#8217;s anything which is clear, it&#8217;s that the  insurance industry is not running this markup, but is running certain people in  this markup.</strong>&#8220;  Thank you Captain Obvious&#8230;and by the way, at their  current pace, the mark-up will be completed&#8230;in seven months&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>6 &#8211; He Was Someone&#8217;s Son&#8230;Someone&#8217;s Friend:</strong> A Census worker <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/23/census-worker-hanged-with_n_297114.html"> was found in Clay County, Kentucky</a>&#8230;hanged and with the word &#8220;<em>FED</em>&#8221;  written upon his chest.  Local police think it <strong>MAY</strong> be a  homicide&#8230;but aren&#8217;t ruling anything out.  Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/24/census-worker-death-very_n_298433.html"> sane people</a> are calling for a more &#8220;<em>civilized dialogue</em>&#8221; before  heated, oft violent, anti-government talk leads to violence&#8230;and the &#8220;<em>wing-nut  panderers</em>&#8221; on the right, denounce anyone making such a &#8220;<em>call to reason</em>&#8221;  as a &#8220;<em>crybaby</em>.&#8221;  It is important to realize in the midst of all the  &#8220;<em>anti-government</em>&#8221; venom&#8230;that government workers, like this poor  individual, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/23/bill-sparkman-census-work_n_297220.html"> have their own stories</a>:  Bill Sparkman was a cancer survivor, and while  working for the Boy Scouts of America, he discovered a love of teaching.   While undergoing cancer treatments&#8230;he enrolled to get his degree in teaching  and eventually became a substitute teacher.  Not some &#8220;<em>evil government  bureaucrat</em>&#8220;&#8230;not some &#8220;<em>vile socialist</em>&#8220;&#8230;just a good civil servant  and teacher, who wanted to help his fellow citizens.</p>
<p><strong>7 &#8211; Tortured Logic:</strong> Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) has formulated an  interesting concept.  Perhaps sensing that Americans are losing their  vitriol towards gay marriage issues&#8230;but still have strong reactions to &#8220;<em>socialism</em>,&#8221; <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/23/king-gay-marriage-socialist/">King  proposes that</a> : <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Gay Marriage&#8230;is socialism</span>.  King says, &#8220;<strong>So  in the end this is something that has to come with a, if there&#8217;s a push for a  socialist society, a society where the foundations of individual rights and  liberties are undermined and everybody is thrown together, living collectively  off of one pot of resources earned by everyone. That is, this is one of the  goals they have to go to is same-sex marriage because it has to plow through  marriage in order to get to their goal. They want public affirmation. They want  access to public funds and resources. Eventually all those resources will be  pooled because that&#8217;s the direction we&#8217;re going. And not only is it a radical  social idea, it is a purely socialist concept in the final analysis.</strong>&#8220;   I&#8217;m not usual in favor of news laws regulating behavior or speech&#8230;but there  certainly ought to be <strong>SOME</strong> penalty for abusing logic in this way.</p>
<p><strong>8 &#8211; We Don&#8217;t Need No Steenking Warrants:</strong> Today, the Department of  Justice&#8217;s assistant attorney general <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/23/watch-doj-official-blows_n_296209.html"> revealed that some of the powers</a> that President Bush (<em>and previous DOJ  officials</em>) asserted were given by the Patriot Act&#8230;<em>really weren&#8217;t</em>.   In addition, during the same Congressional Hearing&#8230;the assistant AG revealed  that most of the powers granted (<em>and assumed</em>) weren&#8217;t even used to fight  terrorism, but were instead used in drug cases and other criminal matters.   At one point, while the DOJ official attempted to justify the use of &#8220;<strong>roving  wiretaps</strong>&#8221; which do not explicitly state who or what is to be searched,   Senator Al Franken <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/60611/al-franken-reads-the-4th-amendment-to-justice-department-official"> had to point out</a> that what the official was saying&#8230;<strong>CLEARLY VIOLATES</strong> the Fourth Amendment: &#8220;<strong>&#8230;&#8217;no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause,  supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be  searched, and the persons or things to be seized&#8217;&#8230;That’s pretty explicit  language.</strong>&#8220;  The assistant attorney general muttered, &#8220;<strong>this is  surreal,</strong>&#8221; and then replied, &#8220;<strong>I would refer to the other branch of  government,</strong>&#8221; by which he obviously meant the courts.  If there is one  person who shouldn&#8217;t have to be read the Fourth Amendment, and shouldn&#8217;t be  irritated at having to obey the Constitution&#8230;you would think it would be one  of the country&#8217;s <strong>TOP LAWYERS</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>9 &#8211; Isn&#8217;t She Delightful:</strong> Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and  Representative Eric Cantor (R-VA) <a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200909230004">posted in a  conservative blog</a> that they are &#8220;<strong>proud to serve</strong>&#8221; with Representative  Michelle Bachmann (R-MN).  Any smart, sane politician would be working to  distance themselves <strong>GREATLY</strong> from the increasingly unpopular,  idiocy-spewing, <a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/rd?to=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27254_Page2.html#ixzz0RrmvVRd8"> electorally poisonous</a> Representative from Minnesota.  That&#8217;s your GOP  leadership, ladies and gentlemen&#8230;it should be said that later, perhaps after  coming to their senses, <em>the post was removed</em>.</p>
<p><strong>10 &#8211; Asking For Trouble:</strong> President Obama&#8217;s nominee <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jC3T-8SMSamUKD8D-j8atTCcoFYgD9ATDUT04"> to head the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration</a>, which is in charge  of highway safety&#8230;is Anne Ferro.  Ferro&#8230;was a lobbyist for the &#8220;<em>Big  Trucking</em>,&#8221; and has been called &#8220;a<strong>n apologist for the trucking industry</strong>.&#8221;   Really?  You picked a trucking lobbyist?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Three words:</span> <strong> easily-avoidable-mistake</strong>.  No excuse for it&#8230;</p>
<p>It certainly is a strange, turbulent, and maddeningly misinformed nation that  we live in&#8230;it says a lot about us that so many still have hope for a more  reasonable and better time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/top-ten-most-ridiculous-things-i-read-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

