<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Representative Broun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/representative-broun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Obama&#8217;s Prize, Mary&#8217;s Baby, And Rush&#8217;s Testicles</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIGNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nataline Sarkisyan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Lowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality Liberation Front blog post our weekly "Chaos Theory" edition...featuring the very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected officials and members of the media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is that time again:  Friday is when we here at the Reality  Liberation Front blog post our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition&#8230;featuring the  very latest strange and unexplainable behavior committed by our elected  officials and members of the media.</p>
<p>&#8230;and it has been a <strong>VERY</strong> busy couple of days, leaving us with a lot of  ground to cover, so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The request made a year ago for Sarah Palin&#8217;s emails&#8230;<a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/965388.html">still  	unfulfilled</a> by the Governor&#8217;s Office, that usually responds to such &#8220;<em>public  	record requests</em>&#8221; in <strong>TEN DAYS</strong>.  The department says that it  	sometimes takes longer for &#8220;<em>complicated</em>&#8221; requests&#8230;but since we all  	know that pulling up archived emails is not complicated, some are asking  	what the delay <strong>REALLY</strong> signifies.</li>
<li>Senator Kyl (R-AZ) may have really stepped in it when he mocked women&#8217;s  	need for Maternity Care to be covered by their insurance&#8230;saying it wasn&#8217;t  	fair to include it because, in his words: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t need maternity care</strong>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/kyl-hit-with-local-ads-sh_b_308405.html"> Not only have ads been run</a> in his state, to make women aware of Kyl&#8217;s  	statements&#8230;but now 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/arizona-mothers-storm-kyl_b_313458.html"> mothers are showing up</a> at his Senate Office in protest.  It certain  	doesn&#8217;t help Kyl and the GOP&#8217;s image with women voters, that they voted <strong> AGAINST</strong> an amendment that would bar companies from getting government  	contracts&#8230;if they pressure female employees not to file harassment claims.</li>
<li>In an increasingly disturbing trend involving Republicans attempting  	label Democrats as &#8220;<em>enemies</em>&#8221; of America, Representative Paul Broun  	(R-GA) 	<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/broun-pelosi-a-domestic-enemy-of-the-constitution.php?ref=fpblg"> referred to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi</a> as a &#8220;<strong>domestic enem[y] of the  	Constitution.</strong>&#8220;  Broun wasn&#8217;t finished: &#8220;<strong>When I was sworn into  	the Marine Corps, I was sworn to uphold the Constitution against every  	enemy, foreign and domestic.  We&#8217;ve got a lot of domestic enemies of  	the Constitution and one of those sits in the speaker&#8217;s chair of the United  	States Congress, Nancy Pelosi.</strong>&#8220;  Broun, when you were sworn into  	the Marine Corps, you were also sworn to obey and respect your Commander in  	Chief&#8230;but that didn&#8217;t stop you from calling Obama &#8220;<em>Hitler.</em>&#8220;   	Maybe you didn&#8217;t understand your oath?</li>
<li>Of course, Broun isn&#8217;t the only one lobbing insults at Pelosi&#8230;the  	National Republican Congressional Committee said Pelosi should &#8220;<strong>be put in  	her place</strong>&#8221; over her remarks about Afghanistan.  Number of  	Republican, female legislators and Republican women&#8217;s groups 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/female-republicans-fail-t_n_314265.html"> willing to declare</a> the statement sexist and inappropriate:  <strong>ZERO</strong>.   	Representative Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no</span>.  Representative  	Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nope</span>.  Representative Sue Myrick  	(R-N.C.)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">nuh uh</span>.  Representative Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">not  	a word</span>.  Representative Mary Bono Mack&#8217;s (R-CA)&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no way</span>.   	The list of shame goes on, and on&#8230;<strong>sad</strong>.</li>
<li>Robert Lowry, the Republican running against Representative Wasserman  	Schultz in her bid for re-election&#8230;well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/robert-lowry-shoots-targe_n_315229.html"> he thought it would fun</a> at a &#8220;<em>shooting event</em>&#8221; to shoot at a  	target, which showed the silhouette of a body, and upon which Wasserman  	Schultz&#8217;s initials had been written next to the head of the target.   	First he tried to call it a &#8220;<strong>joke</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and then later said it was a &#8220;<strong>mistake</strong>.&#8221;   	You were right the second time Lowry&#8230;<em>it&#8217;s a big mistake</em>.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/boehner-pence-vote-agains_n_314194.html"> That&#8217;s right</a>:  the latest defense bill&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">the Republicans are  	voting against it</span>&#8230;because it also has provisions that would protect  	gay people against violence.  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Message received:</span> </strong>The GOP  	believes in defending America&#8217;s citizens&#8230;<em>just not if they&#8217;re gay</em>.</li>
<li>Paul Krugman has written 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion"> an interesting column</a> about the GOP&#8217;s current &#8220;<em>politics of spite</em>:&#8221;   	that they will vote against anything, no matter how worthwhile, if it came  	from the President or other Democrats.  How else can you explain that 	<strong>THIRTY</strong> Republican Senators voted against Al Franken&#8217;s bill to punish  	government contractors who &#8220;<strong>restrict their employees from taking  	workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court?</strong>&#8220;   	The Senators who voted against the bill are:</li>
<p><strong>Alexander (R-TN)<br />
Barrasso (R-WY)<br />
Bond (R-MO)<br />
Brownback (R-KS)<br />
Bunning (R-KY)<br />
Burr (R-NC)<br />
Chambliss (R-GA)<br />
Coburn (R-OK)<br />
Cochran (R-MS)<br />
Corker (R-TN)<br />
Cornyn (R-TX)<br />
Crapo (R-ID)<br />
DeMint (R-SC)<br />
Ensign (R-NV)<br />
Enzi (R-WY)<br />
Graham (R-SC)<br />
Gregg (R-NH)<br />
Inhofe (R-OK)<br />
Isakson (R-GA)<br />
Johanns (R-NE)<br />
Kyl (R-AZ)<br />
McCain (R-AZ)<br />
McConnell (R-KY)<br />
Risch (R-ID)<br />
Roberts (R-KS)<br />
Sessions (R-AL)<br />
Shelby (R-AL)<br />
Thune (R-SD)<br />
Vitter (R-LA)<br />
Wicker (R-MS)</strong></ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>It was a hard week for FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity.  First&#8230;former comedian  	and now noticeably <strong>UNFUNNY</strong> political hack, Dennis Miller (<em>what  	happened to you, Dennis&#8230;seriously</em>) appeared on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor.   	After Miller was done poking fun at CNN and MSNBC&#8230;he went after Hannity  	and Beck.  Of course&#8230;after that, he kissed O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s behind&#8230;and  	Beck&#8217;s&#8230;and Roger Ailes&#8217;&#8230;and all the women on FOX&#8230;<em>yick</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XM3FZtTnQhA&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA">www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM3FZtTnQhA</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Next up in Hannity&#8217;s &#8220;<em>not-so-hot</em>&#8221; week&#8230;his smear campaign  	against Kevin Jennings, who President Obama has appointed Assistant Deputy  	Secretary at the Department of Education for the Office of Safe and Drug  	Free Schools, was derailed by Hannity&#8217;s guest, George Stephanopoulos.   	Hannity was, as usual, attempting to misrepresent Jennings as some sort of &#8220;<em>lefty-gay-activist-who-is-going-to-turn-all-kids-gay</em>&#8220;&#8230;but  	George wasn&#8217;t having any of it, and points out that 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/03/kevin-jennings/">the facts just  	aren&#8217;t on Hannity&#8217;s side</a>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NYaZVZKBhW4&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4">www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaZVZKBhW4</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>The third &#8220;<em>Hannity Fail</em>&#8221; came when Hannity decided he had what it  	took to face off against filmaker Michael Moore&#8217;s facts&#8230;armed only with  	his usual assumptions and generalizations:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dptz3PnOPJ8&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dptz3PnOPJ8</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Saturday, we wrote about conservatives rejoicing over America&#8217;s loss (<em>regarding  	the Olympics</em>)&#8230;simply because it is also a loss for Obama.  We  	also mentioned that one conservative set aside partisanship and actually  	wrote a column thanking the President for trying to bring the Olympics (<em>and  	the resulting pride, revenues, and JOBS</em>) back to our country.  That  	conservative was talk show host, and former Republican legislator, Joe  	Scarborough.  So what can we expect when a conservative takes a &#8220;<em>time  	out</em>&#8221; to behave like a reasonable, patriotic American?  <strong>That&#8217;s  	right</strong>&#8230;Rush Limbaugh  has decided to pronounce Scarborough a &#8220;<strong>neutered  	chickified moderate.</strong>&#8220;  You have to appreciate that Scarborough,  	unlike so many other conservatives to face Rush&#8217;s wrath, did not back down:  	&#8220;<strong>I would be careful if I had put my testicles in a blind trust for George  	W. Bush for eight years.  So now, I guess what you do to prove that  	you&#8217;re a real conservative, because you weren&#8217;t a real conservative over the  	past eight years, you call the president names.</strong>&#8221; <em>Yowch</em>!</li>
<li>As one last item&#8230;let&#8217;s watch Stephen Colbert mock Glenn Beck&#8217;s  	breathless and weepy fearmongering, <em>as only Colbert can</em>&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252013" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OVAL OFFICE:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>President Obama&#8230;<a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html">has  	won the Nobel Peace Prize</a>.  For his work to advance nuclear  	disarmament, foster better relations with Muslim countries, and to encourage  	cooperation towards shared goals, Obama has been awarded the most  	prestigious peace award the international community can bestow.  The  	citation reads, in part, &#8220;<strong>Obama has as President created a new climate in  	international politics,&#8221; the citation read, in part. &#8220;Multilateral diplomacy  	has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United  	Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and  	negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most  	difficult international conflicts.</strong>&#8220;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obamas-nobel-prize-inspir_n_315167.html"> Two very interesting groups</a> have received this news with disgust and  	outrage: <em>American conservatives&#8230;and Taliban/Al Qaeda/Terrorist  	organizations</em>.  In fact&#8230;Rush Limbaugh went as far 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910090029">as to say</a>, &#8220;<strong>Our  	president is a worldwide joke. Folks, do you realize something has happened  	here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about and that is he  	doesn&#8217;t deserve the award. Now that&#8217;s hilarious, that I&#8217;m on the same side  	of something that the Taliban, and that we all are on the same side as the  	Taliban.</strong>&#8220;  Are you sure that&#8217;s what you really want to say,  	Rush&#8230;that you side with <strong>TERRORISTS</strong> against the <strong>PRESIDENT</strong>?   	Joe Scarborough and his guests 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obama-nobel-prize-a-disas_n_314997.html"> voiced a very different complaint</a>&#8230;that receiving an &#8220;<em>international  	award</em>&#8221; can <strong>ONLY</strong> be seen as a bad thing.  Scarborough said, &#8220;<strong>The  	upside is the Nobel Prize committee that has had suspect selections in the  	past has just befuddled a lot of people across the world</strong>,&#8221; and <em>Time</em>&#8216;s  	Mark Halperin added, &#8220;<strong>I predict right now that he will find a way to  	basically turn it down&#8230;I think he is going to say, I share this with the  	world or whatever. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll embrace this. Because there is no  	upside.</strong>&#8220;  Really?  The Nobel Peace Prize?  I  	mean&#8230;really?  You&#8217;re going to call receiving it a <strong>NEGATIVE</strong> event?</li>
<li><em>Saturday Night Live</em> chose to use its knack for scathing political  	satire to point out a more common complaint about President Obama&#8230;he just  	hasn&#8217;t done that much.  And given that we still have troops in Iraq and  	Afghanistan, Wall Street remains unregulated, 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091003/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_climate_bill_obama_7"> we&#8217;re told</a> not to expect Climate Change legislations, and they say that  	Obama 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/04/obama-to-take-on-dont-ask_n_309040.html"> will start to fight</a> for gay people&#8217;s civil liberties at the &#8220;<strong>right  	time</strong>&#8220;&#8230;it seems SNL may have a good point:</li>
</ul>
<p><object id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="384" height="283" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="W4727a250e66f97234acf96ca26d389c6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="384" height="283" src="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4acf96ca26d389c6/4ac89525fd239f22/d7dbc5d3/-cpid/51218ae881aed8bf" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Health Care Reform has a new ally:  former Presidential candidate,  	and former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kansas).  Not only did  	Dole predict that the bill will be signed in 2010&#8230;<a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/20187">he  	explained exactly why</a> Republicans are opposing it: &#8220;<strong>Sometimes people  	fight you just to fight you.  They don&#8217;t want Reagan to get it, they  	don&#8217;t want Obama to get it, so we&#8217;ve got to kill it&#8230;Health care is one of  	those things.  Now we&#8217;ve got to do something.</strong>&#8220;  Dole warned,  	as other analysts have, that blind opposition to reform will, in the end,  	help the President politically and hurt the GOP.  As more distinguished  	GOP leaders from days past come forward and make these assertions&#8230;it seems  	to be having an impact, and there is some word that the GOP might be  	scrambling to find ways to both save face and vote for the bill.  	<a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/10/07/breaking-senate-gop-folding-over-health-care-reform/"> RedState.com&#8217;s Erick Erickson</a> reports,  &#8220;<strong>I am told quite reliably that in a meeting today on Capitol Hill,  		Republican Senators began to rapidly move toward concessions on health  		care because they are afraid they cannot hold their members. Some  		Republicans are now thinking of supporting a government program.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>There&#8217;s new life in the &#8220;<em>public option</em>&#8221; and some are calling it  	the &#8220;<em>opt-out public option</em>.&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/schumer-opt-out-public-op_n_313946.html"> Details are few</a>, but it appears that it would involve a government-run  	insurance plan&#8230;and states could choose not to allow it in their state.   	Democrats and several Republicans seem nominally on board with this, with  	two primary concerns:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>One</strong></span>&#8230;is it a &#8220;robust&#8221; version of  	the public option, or a watered down one.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Two</strong></span>&#8230;how many  	people will it truly help, if many states choose not to implement it?   	The first seems a valid concern, while the second does not.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Our  	prediction:</strong></span> If states choose <strong>NOT</strong> to allow their  	citizens the option to buy affordable public insurance in their state&#8230;it  	will be political suicide for those governors and legislators.  People  	will leave states that don&#8217;t offer it&#8230;and will vote out of office the  	people responsible for not allowing it to be purchased, particularly once  	word gets out that the people who <strong>DO</strong> purchase it in other states, are  	very pleased with it.</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/cigna-employee-flips-off_n_314189.html"> Hilda and Krikor Sarkisyan</a> travelled with friends and supporters to the  	CIGNA headquarters in Philadelphia to speak to the CEO&#8230;and to complain  	that his company&#8217;s actions had <strong>KILLED THEIR DAUGHTER</strong>.  CIGNA had  	refused to pay for their daughter&#8217;s liver transplant because they said that  	the completely proven and established surgery was&#8230;wait for it&#8230;&#8221;<strong>too  	experimental</strong>.&#8221;  CIGNA eventually, following protests, changed its  	mind, but it was too late for Nataline Sarkisyan.  While there, several  	CIGNA employees on a balcony decided to show their support and sympathy for  	the Sarkisyans&#8230;by heckling them and making obscene gestures, and  	eventually the police were called to remove the Sarkisyans from the  	property.  CIGNA&#8217;s HR Director&#8217;s response: &#8220;<strong>I was very disappointed  	to learn of the behavior of one of our employees when you were at our  	company&#8217;s headquarters.  I sincerely regret this individual&#8217;s offensive  	and inappropriate action.  Please know that he did not represent the  	views of our company or the views of other employees who work here. We  	deeply empathize with you and wish you peace and comfort in your loss.</strong>&#8220;   	Sorry&#8230;I don&#8217;t think one smarmy letter from your company&#8217;s HR hack is going  	to smooth this one over.  To make matters worse, the Sarkisyan&#8217;s can&#8217;t  	take legal action:  A 1987 Supreme Court ruling <span style="text-decoration: underline;">shields CIGNA from  	lawsuit</span>.</li>
<li>Still haven&#8217;t seen Keith Olbermann&#8217;s special on Health Care Reform?  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/olbermanns-health-care-sp_n_313392.html"> See it here</a>.  <em>Seriously</em>, go watch it now&#8230;we&#8217;ll wait right  	here for you to come back.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Dick Cheney has been noticeably absent from the talk show circuit as of  	late&#8230;most likely because he is about to be under serious investigation  	regarding his part in the &#8220;Valerie Plame Scandal&#8221; and his part in  	authorizing torture, or perhaps because President Obama has now made 	<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/10/cheney-and-co-all-quiet-counterterrorism-front"> substantial gains in the area of counter-terrorism</a>.  Liz Cheney,  	after a few public debacles where defending her father&#8217;s ideology served  	only to make her appear insufficiently informed on all topics, has similarly  	been off the radar.  But that&#8217;s all ok&#8230;because there is still <strong>ANOTHER</strong> Cheney:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mary Cheney</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;The latest of the family to  	grab headlines is Dick Cheney&#8217;s lesbian daughter&#8230;who is now pregnant, and  	on the way towards having her second child with her partner, Heather Poe.   	Well, since Dick Cheney has come out supporting his daughter fully, and has  	switched to a &#8220;<em>pro-gay marriage</em>&#8221; stance, I&#8217;m sure that the rest of the  	conservative community will be totally fine with this.  What&#8217;s that?   	Oh&#8230;maybe not.  Here is just a sampling of the nauseating reactions 	<a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/mary_cheney_and_heather_poe_to_have_second_child_in_november_freepers_react/"> gathered from</a> the conservative site, the Free Republic, by Pam  	Spaulding:</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;<strong>I respect Dick Cheney, but I don&#8217;t understand why he is allowing his  daughter to take innocent children into her lesbianic home. Can anyone claim  that these kids won&#8217;t be scarred for life? So sad. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Also repugnant, IMNSHO, is the use of &#8216;they are expecting a child&#8217; when,  for obvious reasons &#8216;they&#8217; could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight  [sic] of hand that the left does with rediculous [sic] name reversals (like  &#8216;FAMILY PLANNING&#8217;) that implies something that in fact does just not happen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><strong>As much as I don&#8217;t like it, God will have to sort this out in the end.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Who is the father? Yes, you selfish lesbians, there is ALWAYS a father.  Not that the baby will benefit from one. sick.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this occasion? Yathink?  Congratulations on your baster bastard?</strong>&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>75 years ago, the Veterans of Foreign Wars erected a cross in the Mohave  	Desert, to commemorate soldiers who lost their lives in WWI.  The  	problem:  it&#8217;s federal land, and a former National Parks employee (<em>who,  	it should be noted, is a devout Catholic</em>) says that he has no problems with  	crosses&#8230;he just has a problem with a cross on public land.  Citing  	the Separation Of Church and State, this employee also points out that the  	memorial is clearly unfair to soldiers who were Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, or  	who practiced any faith (<em>or no faith</em>) other than Christianity.  It&#8217;s a  	good thing we have nine clear-headed Supreme Court Justices who can settle  	this easy dispute.  <strong>Or</strong>&#8230;.maybe there are only eight clear-headed  	Justices&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/scalia-defends-cross-on-p_n_313625.html">here&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia</a>: &#8220;<strong>It&#8217;s erected as a war memorial. I assume it is  	erected in honor of all of the war dead.  What would you have them  	erect?&#8230;Some conglomerate of a cross, a Star of David, and you know, a  	Muslim half moon and star?&#8230;I don&#8217;t think you can leap from that to the  	conclusion that the only war dead that that cross honors are the Christian  	war dead. I think that&#8217;s an outrageous conclusion.</strong>&#8220;  Yes&#8230;that&#8217;s  	Antonin Scalia, who holds one of the highest positions in the land&#8230;saying  	that a cross <strong>REPRESENTS EVERYBODY</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope for a quiet weekend&#8230;some of these folks could use a little  &#8220;<em>quiet reflection time</em>.&#8221;  Until Monday&#8230;have a great one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-obamas-prize-marys-baby-and-rushs-testicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Whores, Hags, Dog Mess, and the Year of the Bible</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-whores-hags-dog-mess-and-the-year-of-the-bible/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-whores-hags-dog-mess-and-the-year-of-the-bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Zubaydah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ali Soufan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Ventura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Secretary Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruch Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Hutchison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/modules/wordpress/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Friday, everybody&#8230;that means, of course, it is time for the weekly installment of &#8220;Chaos Theory:&#8221; a round-up of all the week&#8217;s news that I was unable to cover during the rest of the week. POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY: I love a good sparring match as much as the next guy&#8230;and how could you do much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Friday, everybody&#8230;that means, of course, it is time for the weekly  installment of &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>:&#8221; a round-up of all the week&#8217;s news that I was  unable to cover during the rest of the week.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>I love a good sparring match as much as the next guy&#8230;and how could you  	do much better than Michele Bachmann (R) debating with Barney Frank (D),  	moderated by CNN&#8217;s Lou Dobbs.  Frank is <em>crazy-smart</em>, Dobbs is  	<em>crazy-angry</em>, and Bachmann is just <strong><em>crazy-crazy</em></strong>.  	<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/05/barney-frank-faces-down-bachmann-on-acorn-funding.php?ref=fpb"> The subject</a>:  Bachmann has proposed that federal funding should be  	withdrawn from any group that has any of its members indicted.  Her  	primary goal, is to see the funding for ACORN taken away&#8230;but it didn&#8217;t  	take long for Frank to point out how ridiculous the idea really is.  I  	once heard &#8220;<em>you can indict a ham sandwich</em>,&#8221; and it&#8217;s true&#8230;and because it  	is true, it means that anyone who wanted to hurt a group for political  	reasons would only have to get one of its members indicted, which is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">easy</span> to  	do.  Frank also pointed out that funding ACORN and groups like it&#8230;was  	an idea that came from Republicans during the <strong>BUSH ADMINISTRATION</strong>, as an  	effort to contract out community outreach instead of growing government  	agencies.  He also mentioned that her measure could hurt groups she  	doesn&#8217;t intend it to, citing when AIPAC members got indicted, only to have  	all charges dropped&#8230;and also, that when Tom DeLay was indicted, under  	Bachmann&#8217;s plan, all the House Republicans would have lost their funding.   	<strong>Way to really think it through, Michelle.</strong></li>
<li>Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) has a new argument against Global Warming  	theories: CO2 emissions <strong>CAN&#8217;T</strong> be harmful&#8230;because there is CO2 in  	carbonated soft drinks.  It&#8217;s arguments like this that have led The  	Economist 	<a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2009/05/profiles_in_stupidity.cfm"> to include Barton</a> in their series, &#8220;<em>Profiles in Stupidity</em>.&#8221;  An  	excerpt: &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;ve chronicled Mr. Barton&#8217;s stupidity (there really is no other  	word for it) before. Anyone looking for exhibit A in what&#8217;s wrong with the  	Republican Party should start with the good congressman&#8230;Please don&#8217;t get  	me wrong, it&#8217;s not simply that Mr. Barton is a climate-change skeptic. There  	are plenty of those and some make decent arguments against moving ahead with  	measures to control emissions. The problem with Mr. Barton is that he is  	wholly uninterested in the science and statistics of the global warming  	debate. He is about as curious as a dead cat, as is his colleague in the  	Senate, James Inhofe.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>I continue to be shocked to see the RNC trot out attacks on Obama that  	were used during the presidential campaign, were debunked/explained at that  	time, and in the long run, proved ineffective.  	<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/factcheck/200905210003">Their latest</a>:   	they want to remind you, that during the campaign Obama said there was a  	&#8220;<strong>fundamental flaw</strong>&#8221; in the Constitution&#8230;and that means he doesn&#8217;t respect  	the document&#8230;or America.  Of course, the flaw that Obama was  	referring to&#8230;<strong>WAS SLAVERY</strong>.  Even the founding fathers expressed  	disappointment in themselves for failing to resolve the issue at that time,  	and for leaving the door to slavery open.  So, unless you just happen  	to be a &#8220;big fan&#8221; of slavery&#8230;I think we can all agree with Obama on this one.</li>
<li><em><strong>AND</strong></em> in <strong>ANOTHER</strong> classic example of failing to learn from past  	mistakes&#8230;you&#8217;ve probably heard people speak of LBJ&#8217;s &#8220;<em>Daisy</em>&#8221; ad&#8230;the ad  	which showed a little girl playing, and then the image of a mushroom cloud.   	When people talk of this ad, they use it an example of the lowest, most  	shameful form of blatant fearmongering ever perpetrated on the American  	public in the form of a public TV spot.  It is the one, disgusting act, by which all other attempts to  	manipulate voters by scaring them to death, are judged by.  <em>Want to see  	it?</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/22/rnc-remixes-1964-daisy-ad_n_206672.html"> Look no further</a> than the <strong>NEW</strong> RNC ad.  <strong>Here it is:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/H7qkEholuT8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/H7qkEholuT8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Texas Governor Rick Perry (R) recently took some heat for his suggestion  	that Texas should secede from the United States&#8230;some people seemed to  	think that was kind of &#8220;<em>un-American</em>.&#8221;  And now, engaged in the  	political fight of his life against fellow Republican Sen. Kay Bailey  	Hutchison, his advisor, David Carney has come up with 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/rick-perry-aide-dont-open_n_206042.html"> a provocative reason</a> why Hutchison should not be considered.   	Carney said that drawing in new voters, like the women that support  	Hutchison, would be good for the GOP, but &#8220;<strong>that doesn&#8217;t mean you take your  	principles and throw them out the door and become a whorehouse and let  	anybody in who wants to come in, regardless.</strong>&#8221;  Nice&#8230;if there&#8217;s one  	thing women voters like to hear, it&#8217;s female politicians inferred to be  	&#8220;<em>whores</em>.&#8221;</li>
<li>A <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/20/steele-liberalism-kill/">Public Service Announcement</a> from RNC Chairman Michael Steele:  	<strong>Being a  	liberal&#8230;can KILL YOU</strong>.  Steele says, &#8220;<strong>The Republican Party’s  	credibility as the reliably conservative choice has been damaged, and it’s  	up to us to fix it. Faith, freedom, personal responsibility, respect for  	life and prosperity&#8230;Like a bad diet, liberalism will kill you.  	It’s a drug we don’t need to be hooked on. We are what stand  	between an America of prosperity or dependency. Which one do you want?</strong>&#8221;   	Now you know&#8230;and knowing is half the battle.</li>
<li>Georgia Republican Representative Paul Broun 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22832.html">has a dream</a>&#8230;he  	wants 2010 to be officially declared the <em>Year of the Bible</em>.   	Broun also wants to make sure that nobody thinks this has <strong>ANYTHING</strong> to  	do with Christianity&#8230;because, of course, some people might call the  	government endorsing religion &#8220;<em>unconstitutional</em>.&#8221;  No&#8230;Broun  	says it&#8217;s just because the book has been really, really important in the  	creation of America.  <em>And people say the Republicans don&#8217;t have any  	new ideas&#8230;</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Under allegations that she knew our government was using torture and she  	did nothing, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has claimed that the CIA never briefed her  	that that torture was being utilized.  So&#8230;how does the conservative  	media question the veracity of Pelosi&#8217;s claims?  By attacking her  	looks, of course.  Media Matters put together 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200905180006">this list</a>, which  	includes comparisons between Pelosi and a &#8220;<strong>hag</strong>,&#8221; assertions that she  	uses Botox, and a claim that she is unable to perform &#8220;<strong>human facial  	expression.</strong>&#8221;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Very</span> highbrow.  <strong>Here&#8217;s a clip:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vhd9_sqjHsI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vhd9_sqjHsI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>I feel like I&#8217;m taking crazy pills:</strong> recently, right-wing radio  	host Michael Savage 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/19/michael-savage-tees-off-o_n_205392.html"> attacked</a>&#8230;Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh?  Savage said: &#8220;.<strong>..here  	in America, I&#8217;ve had some people come to my aid. They see the bigger  	picture. They&#8217;re not like [Bill] O&#8217;Reilly; they&#8217;re not like Limbaugh, who&#8217;s  	the biggest disappointment of all. Limbaugh has turned out to be the biggest  	phony of all of them, all of them. Amongst all of them, he is the biggest  	fraud. Rush Limbaugh is a fraud. When he was accused of the drug usage, I  	supported him. But that man is a one-way street. It&#8217;s all about him. He&#8217;s in  	it for nobody but himself.</strong>&#8221;  This seems to stem from the fact that  	neither O&#8217;Reilly nor Limbaugh defended Savage when the United Kingdom  	announced that Savage was not welcome in their country because he is a  	person who &#8220;<em>stirs up hate</em>.&#8221;  Ooops&#8230;I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll all be  	BFF&#8217;s again in no time.</li>
<li>Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura is on a <strong>MEDIA RAMPAGE</strong>.   	First&#8230;he proves that he is clearly &#8220;<em>crazy, not stupid</em>&#8221; on Sean  	Hannity&#8217;s show, where he proceeds to make Hannity <span style="text-decoration: underline;">very</span> uncomfortable&#8230;leading Hannity to make several inane assertions, like  	saying that Bush &#8220;<strong>inherited</strong>&#8221; 9/11 (<em>Sean&#8230;it&#8217;s hard for a  	president to inherit something that happens nine months <strong>AFTER</strong> he  	takes office</em>), and that &#8220;<strong>loving Reagan</strong>&#8221; counts as a notable  	accomplishment.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/19/jesse-ventura-gets-in-the_n_205146.html"> That clip</a>, is worth viewing.  Ventura was upset that Hannity cut  	the interview short, as he wanted to discuss waterboarding&#8230;as a Navy SEAL,  	Ventura experienced waterboarding during his training, and 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/22/jesse-ventura-challenges_n_206694.html"> he claims</a> that he could waterboard Hannity and get him to admit that &#8220;<strong>Barack  	Obama is the greatest president.</strong>&#8221;  He says the reason Hannity cut  	things short: &#8220;<strong>He&#8217;s scared to death of me.  It was over in a few  	minutes and that was it.</strong>&#8221; Ventura recently took on Elisabeth Hasselbeck  	of The View, and 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/18/ventura-and-hasselbeck-de_n_204774.html"> to a similar result</a>.  He told her: &#8220;<strong>If waterboarding is OK, why  	don&#8217;t we let our police do it to suspects so they can learn what they know?   	If waterboarding is OK, why didn&#8217;t we waterboard [Timothy] McVeigh and  	Nichols, the Oklahoma City bombers, to find out if there were more people  	involved?&#8230;We only seem to waterboard Muslims&#8230;Have we waterboarded anyone  	else? Name me someone else who has been waterboarded.</strong>&#8221;  Hasselbeck  	could only respond by trying to make the debate about Pelosi&#8230;at which  	point Ventura points out the obvious fact that ordering and performing  	torture is certainly a worse crime than &#8220;<em>knowing about it,</em>&#8221; and  	therefore is more deserving of our attention.  Lastly, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/jesse-ventura-lays-waste_n_205962.html"> Ventura visits</a> FOX and Friends, where he reminds the hosts that we are a  	nation of <strong>LAWS</strong>&#8230;to which Brian Kilmeade responds than laws aren&#8217;t so  	important when &#8220;<strong>people are on fire</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>buildings are blowing up</strong>.&#8221;   	Kilmeade goes the ridiculous step further of saying that he will stop  	supporting torture when &#8220;<strong>they&#8217;re dead.</strong>&#8221;  Ventura&#8230;again, a Navy  	SEAL, was not impressed with Kilmeade&#8217;s tough talk: &#8220;<strong>Really? Have you  	enlisted? Have you enlisted or are you just talking?&#8230;Go walk the walk,  	don&#8217;t talk the talk.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>I&#8217;ll just treat this item with a brief summary of events:  FOX&#8217;s  	Glenn Beck is invited to appear on <em>The View</em>.  Glenn Beck bumps  	into Whoopi Goldberg and Barbara Walters on the train and they have a  	pleasant discussion.  Glenn Beck goes on the radio, lies about what  	happened on the train, and portrays Goldberg and Walters as bitchy divas.   	Glenn Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/whoopi-goldberg-calls-gle_n_205845.html"> goes on</a> <em>The View</em>, the clip from his radio show is played, and it  	is pointed out that he is a fraud and a liar.  Glenn Beck sheepishly  	smiles, reminds his hosts that he is not a journalist, and is therefore not  	required to research, use facts, or make true statements on his show.   	Goldberg responds that he is a &#8220;<strong>lying sack of dog mess.</strong>&#8221;  Glenn  	Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/21/glenn-beck-demands-a-damn_n_206366.html"> on his next radio show</a>&#8230;demands &#8220;<strong>a damn apology</strong>.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s  	the clip from <em>The View</em>&#8230;it&#8217;s really amazing:</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/W2FK2vchoEo&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/W2FK2vchoEo&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GAY RIGHTS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Yesterday, I was very critical of President Obama, for not taking steps  	to end the military&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell</strong>&#8221; policy, under which valuable,  	veteran soldiers are being discharged from the service because they are gay.   	In part, I was reacting to statements from Pentagon officials, which  	indicated that the president was taking no significant steps towards  	changing or repealing the policy.  However, yesterday, White House  	Press Secretary Gibbs 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/21/gibbs-breaks-from-pentago_n_206534.html"> painted a very different picture</a>, saying that &#8220;<strong>active discussions</strong>&#8221; were  	taking place and that &#8220;t<strong>he President is involved in these discussions. It  	was the President&#8217;s commitment to overturn the policy that&#8217;s not in our  	national interest that is the reason for these discussions and for the  	effort to overturn this. So I think the notion somehow &#8211; the reason Congress  	is involved is the only durable and lasting way with which to overturn the  	policy is to do it by law.</strong>&#8221;  Let&#8217;s hope this is the case.</li>
<li>The National Organization for Marriage is at it again.  You may  	remember they put out a TV spot recently that was <span style="text-decoration: underline;">so</span> overly dramatic, and  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">so</span> overtly pandering to fear and ignorance, that it was openly mocked from  	almost every side.  So, <em>of course</em>, in their second ad they&#8217;ve learned  	from their mistakes and present a more reasonable, intelligent argument&#8230;<strong>oh  	no, wait</strong>&#8230;they put out 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/national-organization-for_n_206003.html"> this nonsense</a> about terribly sad and confused children, psychically  	damaged by the very thought of same-sex marriage.  I don&#8217;t know about  	you&#8230;but most children I have seen dealing with gay relationships of  	parents or parents&#8217; friends, do better at grasping the important concepts  	than most adults do.  Children&#8230;understand what it means to be with  	someone because you love them.  <strong>Here&#8217;s the clip:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/haVqcPfeqKI&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/haVqcPfeqKI&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GHOSTS OF THE PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Members of the Bush Administration have been attempting for months now  	to hide behind the Justice Department memos, taking the position that while  	the use of &#8220;<em>enhanced interrogation techniques</em>&#8221; (<em>read as &#8220;torture&#8221;</em>) may have  	been illegal&#8230;.because they had memos say &#8220;<em>it&#8217;s ok</em>&#8221; they are in the clear.   	But, what if they ordered/condoned/implemented the techniques <strong>BEFORE</strong> the  	memos?  Well, that may be the case, since the White House&#8217;s own  	statements place the capture and interrogation of  Abu Zubaydah as  	starting in March 2002&#8230;and the memos were not issued until August.   	Ali Soufan, a former FBI interrogator, has been testifying in Congress about  	Zubaydah&#8217;s interrogation, and has made it clear that the detainee was  	cooperative and gave good information&#8230;until the CIA and its contractors  	took over and instantly began torturing him. 	<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104350361">One  	source</a> indicates that the CIA interrogator would send a &#8220;<strong>top-secret  	cable</strong>&#8221; to the CIA each day, requesting permission to torture Zubaydah&#8230;the  	CIA would forward the memo to the White House, and White House counsel  	Alberto Gonzales would approve the measures.  <em>Oh Alberto</em>&#8230;you may have  	really stepped in it this time: your appearances before Congress told us you  	were incompetent and had <span style="text-decoration: underline;">no</span> knowledge of Constitutional Law, but this seems  	to indicate that you were foolish <em><strong>beyond even our worst imagining</strong></em>.</li>
<li>Oh&#8230;I pointed out Wednesday that some GOP leaders think that Pelosi did  	the <strong>UNTHINKABLE</strong> in accusing the CIA of deceiving Congress&#8230;despite the fact  	that they have <strong>OFTEN</strong> been found to be deceiving Congress, and there are  	several other legislators (<em>including Republicans</em>) <strong>ALSO</strong> accusing the agency  	of similar behavior.  In light of these accusations, the CIA has  	produced documentation regarding who gave briefings, on what dates, and  	which subjects were covered.  Some initial discrepancies were  	immediately detected (<em>wrong dates, wrong attendees, falsified entries</em>)&#8230;and  	now&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/cia-interrogation-briefin_n_206090.html">more  	mistakes</a>.  CIA&#8230;after the whole &#8220;<em>weapons of mass destruction</em>&#8221;  	thing and now this &#8220;<em>we swear we told Congress we were using torture</em>&#8221;  	thing&#8230;it&#8217;s looking like they&#8217;re either <strong>incompetent or deceptive</strong>&#8230;there&#8217;s  	no third option.</li>
<li>A lot has been made of the &#8220;<em>showdown</em>&#8221; between Obama&#8217;s speech on  	the subject of closing Gitmo, and former VP Cheney&#8217;s speech in defense of  	Gitmo and torture tactics.  Obama&#8217;s speech has been met with mostly  	favorable review&#8230;Cheney&#8217;s speech&#8230; <em>not so much</em>.  It appears some  	people are a bit put off by the obvious omissions, errors, and hyperbole, in  	Cheney&#8217;s argument.  For example, he cited the Director of National Intelligence, Adm. 	Dennis Blair as supporting the techniques&#8230;when what Blair really said was,  	&#8220;<strong>there is no way of knowing whether the same information could have been  	obtained through other means. The bottom line is that these techniques hurt  	our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far  	outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our  	national security.</strong>&#8221;  Cheney said that torture had &#8220;<strong>prevented the  	violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent  	people</strong>,&#8221; despite the top-secret 2004 CIA inspector general&#8217;s investigation  	which found that these techniques had not provided <strong>ANY</strong> significantly helpful  	information, nor had they prevented <strong>ANY</strong> attacks.  He said that Obama&#8217;s  	release of the &#8220;<em>torture memos</em>&#8221; has &#8220;<strong>flatly</strong>&#8221; contrary to U.S. National  	Security&#8230;when, in fact, Admiral Blair had recommended it.  Cheney  	patted himself on the back for pursuing Al Qaeda&#8230;even though 	<span id="lw_1242962158_11" class="yshortcuts">Osama bin Laden</span> and  	his chief lieutenant, Ayman al Zawahri still remain at large.  For a  	thorough examination of how Cheney played fast and loose with the facts  	(<em>which should surprise <strong>NO ONE</strong></em>)&#8230;<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20090521/pl_mcclatchy/3237981">here&#8217;s  	a good read</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PALINWATCH:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Most Misguided Campaign Idea:</strong> John Coale, husband to FOX News&#8217;  	Greta Van Susteren and one-time Palin advisor, approached Palin during her  	husband&#8217;s Iron Dog &#8220;<em>snow machine</em>&#8221; race with a <strong>DOOZY</strong> of an idea:   	<strong>pay  	off Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign debt</strong>.  	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22681.html">Coale&#8217;s idea</a> consisted of using money from Palin&#8217;s PAC to help Clinton pay down her  	debt&#8230;in hopes that this &#8220;<em>friendship</em>&#8221; would help Palin among moderates and  	liberals.  Even Palin realized instantly that this idea was a  	non-starter.  <strong>One:</strong> conservatives who donated the money to her PAC would  	be furious.  <strong>Two:</strong> the geniuses who would vote for Palin just  	because she is a woman already support her.  <strong>Three:</strong> the rest  	of the moderates and liberals&#8230;will <span style="text-decoration: underline;">never</span> support someone with Palin&#8217;s  	agenda (<em>or her loopy behavior</em>), no matter who she befriends.</li>
<li>Sarah Palin, after RNC Chairman Steele&#8217;s recent speech where he  	attempted to revitalize the Republican Party, declared Steele to be &#8220;<strong>bold  	and courageous.</strong>&#8221;  <em>Really?</em> This guy is trying to rebrand the GOP  	as the &#8220;<em>party with lots of ideas</em>&#8220;&#8230;but can&#8217;t think of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">one</span> to mention.   	He is consistently mocked for his use of &#8220;<em>hip-hop</em>&#8221; language which comes  	across as forced, juvenile, and unprofessional.  His own party wants  	him replaced as chairman, and until that can happen they are trying to take  	away all of his control over the party finances.  <em>This</em>&#8230;this is the  	guy you&#8217;re going to support, Sarah? She said: &#8220;<strong>Today, we have a friend in  	RNC Chairman Michael Steele, and his bold and courageous speech defines his  	leadership goals that will guide us all through this most difficult time for  	our nation.</strong>&#8221;  His speech can also be seen 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22750.html">here</a>,  	along with Palin&#8217;s comments&#8230;I think when the majority of the GOP thinks  	the guy is an embarrassment and a media whore, it would be best not to label  	him as the &#8220;<em>great hope</em>&#8221; of the party&#8217;s future.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Ok&#8230;I know it&#8217;s the worst kind of gossip, but if it is true, it is  	<strong>HYSTERICAL</strong>.  By now everyone has heard the name &#8220;<em>Carrie Prejean</em>.&#8221;   	<strong>Quick Summary: </strong> Prejean is Miss California&#8230;she entered the Miss USA  	pageant&#8230;when asked about gay marriage, she voiced her opposition to  	it&#8230;when she lost the competition she blamed the judges for being  	prejudiced against prejudiced people&#8230;it came out that the Miss California  	pageant committee paid for her breast implants&#8230;several partly-nude  	pictures of her surfaced&#8230;Trump did not take her crown, even though the  	photos clearly showed she violated her contract&#8230;now she serves as a  	spokesperson against gay marriage.  <strong>AND NOW</strong>&#8230;a woman 	<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/CelebrityCafe/story?id=7640920&amp;page=1"> has come forward</a> claiming that she had a lesbian relationship with  	Prejean&#8217;s mother&#8230;a recent relationship that ended only weeks before the  	Miss USA competition. <em>AWK-Waaaard!</em></li>
</ul>
<p>Another interesting week&#8230;as long as Obama stays busy, Fox News stays on the  air, Palin still thinks she can be president, and Republicans keep struggling to  make sense to somebody (<strong><em>anybody!</em></strong>)&#8230;I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll have plenty to talk about.</p>
<p>Have a great weekend, my friends&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-whores-hags-dog-mess-and-the-year-of-the-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

