<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Representative Jenkins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/representative-jenkins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition:  More Death, Heckling the Disabled, and Indoctrination</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Pallone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenna Hager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Batiromo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, yours truly has been down for the count all week with the nasty head cold making the rounds in Nashville...so let's try to wrap things up with our weekly edition of Chaos Theory...here's what I've collected over the last five days.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yours truly has been down for the count all week with the nasty head  cold making the rounds in Nashville&#8230;so let&#8217;s try to wrap things up with our  weekly edition of <em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8230;here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve collected over the last five days</em>:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>HEALTHCARE -- THE DEBATE THAT&#8217;S KILLING US SLOWLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Despite the thorough, public debunking of the ridiculous &#8220;<em>death panel</em>&#8221;  	claims, and the fact that even the right-wing press outlets aren&#8217;t  	mentioning the conspiracy theory anymore, some politicians <strong>may not have  	received the memo</strong>.  Representative Pete Olson (R-TX) was holding a  	recent town hall meeting, and he told the crowd about a girl named &#8220;<em>Britney</em>.&#8221;   	The girl&#8217;s unborn child was found to have a heart defect&#8230;and despite her  	best efforts she couldn&#8217;t find a doctor to treat her baby until she located  	a remote, out-of-state specialist.  Olson goes on to claim&#8230;that in  	any proposed &#8220;<em>government-run</em>&#8221; system, the baby would have died for  	lack of treatment.  The crowd, who apparently <strong>HAD</strong> received the  	memo&#8230;and who knew that these types of claims are false and intended only  	to scare them&#8230;proceeded to boo Representative Olson, and shouted, &#8220;<strong>Oh  	Jesus Christ, that&#8217;s terrible</strong>,&#8221; and, &#8220;<strong>That&#8217;s not true!</strong>&#8220;  To  	these people, Olson nonsensically responded, &#8220;<strong>For those of you who say  	it&#8217;s not true, don&#8217;t talk to me, talk to Britney</strong>.&#8221;  Wait&#8230;<em>what</em>?</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_MvNF2GUE0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1&amp;feature=player_embedded" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x_MvNF2GUE0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1&amp;feature=player_embedded" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_MvNF2GUE0">www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_MvNF2GUE0</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee&#8230;not only didn&#8217;t get the &#8220;<em>mentioning-death-panels-now-makes-you-look-like-an-idiot</em>&#8221;  	memo, but he also decided that merely repeating a claim that has been proven  	false&#8230;<em>wasn&#8217;t quite tacky enough</em>.  So Huckabee 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/28/huckabee-kennedy-would-ha_n_271605.html"> went on his radio show</a> and suggested that the recently departed Senator  	Kennedy&#8230;would have been urged to &#8220;<strong>go home to take pain pills and die</strong>&#8221;  	under Obama&#8217;s reform plan.  And we&#8217;ll add some more &#8220;<em>tackiness  	points</em>&#8221; since Huckabee, just last week, chided Democrats for what he  	perceived as them using Ted Kennedy&#8217;s death to advance the cause of reform.  	<strong>Oh Mike: </strong> it&#8217;s just as sick to use his name <strong>AGAINST</strong> reform&#8230;especially when you consider health care reform was his <strong>LIFELONG</strong> goal.</li>
<li>Generally, I don&#8217;t pass on &#8220;<em>moving stories that explain the need for  	Health Care Reform.</em>&#8220;  Except, in this case, the story is a lot more  	&#8220;<em>illuminating</em>&#8221; than it is &#8220;<em>moving</em>,&#8221; and it represents yet  	another deficiency of our current system that most people are not aware of.   	You probably <span style="text-decoration: underline;">did</span> know, that nearly 68% of all bankruptcies in America  	result from medical costs.  What you may not know&#8230;is that many  	divorces are also caused by a mixture of financial and medical necessity.   	Case in point, 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/opinion/30kristof.html?_r=1">read  	this story</a>&#8230;<strong>it&#8217;s actually quite common:</strong> husband develops  	debilitating disease, doctors shock wife by suggesting she immediately get a  	divorce or she will lose everything, wife consults lawyers who confirm what  	the doctors are saying, wife has a terrible choice to make&#8230;leave her  	husband or lose all their savings, retirement, and property.</li>
<li><strong>Interesting:</strong> I&#8217;m first to admit that I am no expert on  	taxes.  But it is interesting to note, 	<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/214267?from=rss">as this columnist does</a>,  	that while Republicans have been heavily utilizing the &#8220;<em>health care  	reform will urge grandma to die sooner</em>&#8221; attack&#8230;many past tax bills (<em>sponsored  	by Republicans, and notably one Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA)</em>) have done  	just that:  <strong>urged grandma to die sooner</strong>.  In addition to  	initiating tax changes that penalize seniors for living longer, Republicans  	have supported companies that swindled seniors out of their retirement money  	(<em>they dismiss it as &#8220;that&#8217;s the way the free market cookie crumbles!&#8221;</em>),  	and they refuse to let more money go into Alzheimer&#8217;s and Parkinson&#8217;s  	research.</li>
<li><strong>And Jesus Shakes His Head, Woefully:</strong> At Congressman Frank  	Pallone&#8217;s (D-NJ) town hall, a woman was attempting to describe her  	situation&#8230;from her wheelchair, she told the congressman that she had &#8220;<strong>two  	incurable auto-immune diseases.</strong>&#8220;  As the woman continued,  	anti-reform members of the crowd&#8230;started heckling her.  I&#8217;m just  	guessing that most of these hecklers would call themselves &#8220;<em>Christians</em>&#8220;&#8230;I&#8217;m  	also guessing that Jesus might have a problem with that.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QkrW22u7SwU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QkrW22u7SwU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkrW22u7SwU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkrW22u7SwU</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Most Lopsided Interview This Week:</strong> On MSNBC, Representative  	Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and CNBC&#8217;s anchor Maria Bartiromo were on as guests,  	to discuss Health Care Reform.  From early in the interview, it is  	apparent that Weiner appeared more than a bit better versed on the  	subject&#8230;but the best moment occurred when Bartiromo mocks Weiner&#8217;s support  	of Medicare, snapping, &#8220;<strong>How come you don&#8217;t use it [Medicare]? You don&#8217;t  	have it. How come you don&#8217;t have it?</strong>&#8220;  Representative  	Weiner&#8230;points out that he is only 45, to which Bartiromo lamely retorts, &#8220;<strong>Yeah,  	c&#8217;mon&#8230;</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfv_KeKRsBo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfv_KeKRsBo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfv_KeKRsBo">www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfv_KeKRsBo</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Word is now coming out of the White House, via correspondence with  	Health Care Advocacy groups, that the administration may be abandoning its  	fight for the public option and several other <strong>KEY</strong> elements of the  	reform bill.  While some White House insiders seem to support the idea  	that &#8220;<em>some bill, even a bad bill, is better than no bill</em>&#8220;&#8230;too many  	people disagree.  House Speaker Pelosi 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26742.html">has chosen to  	side</a> with the caucus of Democratic Progressives who are saying that they 	<strong>WILL NOT</strong> support a bill that does not include the public option.   	Representative Weiner 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/04/anthony-weiner-obama-hasn_n_277640.html"> has made his own claims</a>, that these compromises represent a failure of  	leadership on the part of the President&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/olbermann-obama-could-fac_n_277075.html">and  	as some point out</a>, if &#8220;<strong>change we can believe in</strong>&#8221; becomes &#8220;<strong>change  	we can barely stomach</strong>,&#8221; Obama could face challenges in the next  	primaries from Democrats claiming that they would show a bit more backbone  	if given the majority in both houses of Congress.  <strong>I think the votes  	are in: </strong> if the majority of the public wants reform and the public  	option to be a part of that reform, and you control all of Congress, and all  	the Republican minority promises is dissent&#8230;then you really have no excuse  	for not going to the mat, fighting for the best reform possible.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Stand Back, Genius At Work:</strong> Robert F. McDonnell is a  	candidate for Virginia Governor, and in a recent speech, he proudly  	mentioned his Master&#8217;s thesis, which he wrote while attending an evangelical  	college in Virginia Beach.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Apparently</span>&#8230;McDonnell didn&#8217;t think  	anyone 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/29/AR2009082902434_pf.html"> would bother to look up the thesis</a> in question&#8230;<strong>but they did</strong>.   	The thesis, which outlines the steps McDonnell suggested the Republican  	Party should take to &#8220;<em>protect</em>&#8221; families&#8230;says that feminists and  	working women are &#8220;<strong>detrimental</strong>&#8221; to families, contraception for  	unmarried people is &#8220;<strong>illogical</strong>,&#8221; and that government should show  	clear preference for married people and not &#8220;<strong>cohabitators, homosexuals or  	fornicators.</strong>&#8220;  Hear that <strong>WHOOSHING</strong> sound? Enjoy your trip  	down the political whirlpool, Mr. McDonnell.</li>
<li>First Representative Lynn Jenkins (R-KS) made the mistake of referring  	to Republican&#8217;s search for a viable presidential candidate as the quest to  	find &#8220;<strong>The Great White Hope.</strong>&#8220;  Jenkins then responded to the  	resulting outcry, by stating that she had no idea that this was a racist  	sentiment referring back to the search for a white boxer who could defeat  	black boxing champion, Jack Johnson.  <strong>THEN</strong>&#8230;we find out that  	back in <strong>JULY</strong> (<em>that&#8217;s right, just a few months ago</em>), Jenkins  	supported a resolution that explicitly <strong>STATED</strong> the history of the  	phrase: &#8220;<strong>Whereas the victory by Jack Johnson over Tommy Burns prompted a  	search for a White boxer who could beat Jack Johnson, a recruitment effort  	that was dubbed the search for the &#8216;great white hope.&#8217;</strong>&#8220;  Jenkins  	new position?  She 	<a href="http://www.ottawaherald.com/story/082809jenkinsvote">says she never  	read the resolution</a>, choosing to look like an incompetent legislator,  	rather than a racist.</li>
<li>Minnesota Republican Representative Michele Bachmann is now well known  	for making odd and inflammatory statements (<em>most recently she proposed  	that health care legislation should be defeated with &#8220;fasting and prayer&#8221;</em>).   	But now, <a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200909040004">she has  	her own theory</a> why Democrats, and apparently most of her constituents,  	want her out of office: &#8220;<strong>Also with women politicians, </strong><strong>they  	want to make sure no women, no woman becomes president before a Democrat  	woman, and so they&#8217;re doing everything they can to, I think, sabotage women  	like Sarah Palin, perhaps women like myself,</strong><strong> or similarly  	situated women, to make sure that we don&#8217;t have a prominent national voice.   	But the thing is, the people in our country, they don&#8217;t care who the voice  	is, they just want someone, they want to know that someone is speaking out  	for them against what will certainly bring about the destruction of our  	great country if we continue to go down the Obama path.</strong>&#8220;   	Yeah&#8230;it&#8217;s the <strong>DEMOCRATS</strong> who have such a pronounced diversity  	problem&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GHOSTS OF OUR PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number One:</strong> President Obama has now reversed his  	initial position, and has said that the White House visitor records 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/04/white-house-visitor-logs_n_277227.html"> will be released</a> to the public, in a clear reversal of Bush policy.   	That&#8217;s great&#8230;one down, eleven to go.  Next we&#8217;d like to see an end to  	renditions, warrantless wiretaps, signing statements, excessive use of the &#8220;<em>State  	Secrets</em>&#8221; defense, and refusal of Due Process to detainees&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number Two:</strong> Former Secretary of Homeland Defense  	Tom Ridge stunned many when his book was released and clearly indicated that  	he had been suspiciously pressured to raise the Terror Alert Level.  He  	surprised everyone 	<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/ridge-dont-believe-everything-you-read----especially-on-my-book-jacket.php?ref=fpb"> even more</a> when he went on Rachel Maddow&#8217;s show, denied that the claim  	was true, said that any suspicions he had in the past he now knew were false  	(<em>but not for any particular reason&#8230;he just &#8220;knows&#8221;</em>),  he  	criticizes the government response to Katrina&#8230;then defends it, and he says  	that even though every reason the government gave us for going into Iraq has  	been proven false, it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>ok</em>&#8221; because it was really always about  	bringing democracy to the country.  Rachel&#8230;<strong>seemed to take issue&#8230;</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qIzsZ3g7dTU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qIzsZ3g7dTU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIzsZ3g7dTU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIzsZ3g7dTU</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Flip-Flop Number Three:</strong> Former Attorney General Alberto  	Gonzales&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/alberto-gonzales-flip-flo_n_276899.html">raised  	a few eyebrows</a> when he stated that he approved of Attorney General  	Holder&#8217;s investigation into interrogators who exceeded the bounds of the  	controversial DOJ memos justifying torture: &#8220;.<strong>..if people go beyond that,  	I think it is legitimate to question and examine that conduct to ensure  	people are held accountable for their actions, even if it&#8217;s action in  	prosecuting the war on terror.</strong>&#8220;  It took about a day for Alberto to  	change his mind: &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t support the investigation by the department  	because this is a matter that has already been reviewed thoroughly and  	because I believe that another investigation is going to harm our  	intelligence gathering capabilities and that&#8217;s a concern that&#8217;s shared by  	career intelligence officials and so for those reasons I respectfully  	disagree with the decision.</strong>&#8220;  I don&#8217;t know how he keeps from  	getting whiplash&#8230;my neck hurts just reading this.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The <em>Today Show</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/30/today-show-hires-jenna-bu_n_272220.html"> has a new hire</a>:  Jenna Hager, formerly Jenna Bush, daughter of  	former President George Bush.  Ok&#8230;yes, she has knowledge of &#8220;<em>living  	in the White House</em>,&#8221; but that does not equal &#8220;<em>White House insider  	knowledge.</em>&#8220;  She is a fledgling school teacher&#8230;but that does not  	make her an &#8220;<em>expert on education.</em>&#8220;  Lastly, besides her apparent  	expertise in <strong>NOTHING</strong>, I&#8217;m just not certain that hiring the daughter  	of one of the most partisan presidents in recent history will result in  	anything resembling unbiased, non-partisan journalism.  <em>Just my  	prediction&#8230;</em></li>
<li><strong>How Does This Guy Stay On Television:</strong> Pat Buchanan&#8230;it&#8217;s  	not bad enough that he was part of Nixon&#8217;s cabal&#8230;or that when running for  	president he revealed a deep-seated anger towards immigrants&#8230;and later as  	a columnist and MSNBC commentator, he voiced racist and anti-Semitic  	sentiments&#8230;but now, his recent column &#8220;<em>Did Hitler Want War</em>,&#8221;  	Buchanan seems to defend the worst genocidal dictator in world history.  	<a href="http://buchanan.org/blog/did-hitler-want-war-2068">You be the judge</a>.   	When a man has an 	<a href="http://www.adl.org/special_reports/buchanan_own_words/buchanan_intro.asp"> entire page</a> dedicated to him on the Anti-Defamation League&#8217;s (ADL)  	website, maybe he should not be featured so prominently in the mainstream  	media&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY</strong></span>:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Has everybody lost their minds? </em> When I heard that the  	President was going to address the nation&#8217;s schoolchildren, I thought &#8220;<em>big  	deal.</em>&#8220;  Presidents do this.  All presidents&#8230;both parties.   	They say &#8220;<em>hey, stay in school&#8230;don&#8217;t do drugs&#8230;you could be presidents  	someday&#8230;wink.</em>&#8220;  Well, the conservative media, and the GOP,  	specifically the Florida Republican Party, have decided that the message is  	an attempt to&#8230;wait for it&#8230;<strong>INDOCTRINATE OUR CHILDREN</strong>.  They  	say kids, &#8220;<strong>will be forced to watch the president justify his plans for  	government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies, increasing  	taxes on those who create jobs, and racking up more debt than any other  	president.</strong>&#8220;  Of course&#8230;this is <strong>BEYOND</strong> ridiculous, and  	Politifact.com 	<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/sep/02/republican-party-florida/republican-party-florida-says-obama-will-indoctrin/"> has chosen</a> to give the myth the much coveted &#8220;<em>Pants On Fire</em>&#8221;  	designation.</li>
</ul>
<p>That brings this week to a much-needed close.  Have a wonderful Labor  Day weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-more-death-heckling-the-disabled-and-indoctrination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition:  Goodbye Teddy, Pentagon Profiling, and a Bad Joke</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-goodbye-teddy-pentagon-profiling-and-a-bad-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-goodbye-teddy-pentagon-profiling-and-a-bad-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives for Patients' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frances Fragos Townsend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Rammell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it's Friday and time for our weekly, "Chaos Theory Edition" round-up of all the week's strange and disturbing news items that we were unable to cover in previous posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s Friday and time for our weekly, &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; round-up of  all the week&#8217;s strange and disturbing news items that we were unable to cover in  previous posts.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GOODBYE, TEDDY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s the end of an era&#8230;with the passing of Senator Edward Kennedy, the  	last of the four Kennedy brothers leaves our world and immediately enters  	the pages of the history books.  <strong>He was many things:</strong> a staunch  	liberal, a man well liked by legislators on both sides of the aisle, a  	skilled negotiator, a survivor of numerous personal tragedies and scandals,  	and a man who generally favored the pursuit of equality and the betterment  	of the lives of less-fortunate Americans.  Want to know more of Ted  	Kennedy&#8217;s accomplishments?  Here&#8217;s 	<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TedKennedy/story?id=7787098">a good  	write-up</a> of the man often called the &#8220;<em>Liberal Lion of the Senate.</em>&#8220;   	You&#8217;ve been affected by his work&#8230;and may not have even known it:   	The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the State  	Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), the Family Opportunity Act of  	2006&#8230;all of which are related to his lifelong goal of providing better  	health care opportunities to more Americans, especially children.</li>
<li>Both Democrats and Republicans have been quick to praise the late  	senator and his life&#8217;s work.  If you want to hear some remarkable  	praise from men and women of <strong>ALL</strong> political leanings&#8230;<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090826/ap_on_go_co/us_kennedy_reaction;_ylt=ArPV.UqeV7DBox8vwWzOQHis0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTFlaG5jcWFlBHBvcwM4NwRzZWMDYWNjb3JkaW9uX3BvbGl0aWNzBHNsawNyZXB1YmxpY2Fuc2o-">this  	is a good source</a>.  <strong>Some examples:</strong> President George W. Bush  	said, &#8220;<strong>In a life filled with trials, Ted Kennedy never gave in to self-pity or despair.</strong>&#8220;  President 	<span id="lw_1251324597_5" style="cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> George H.W. Bush</span><span id="lw_1251324597_5" style="cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> said, </span>&#8220;<strong>While we didn&#8217;t see eye to eye on many political issues  	through the years, I always respected his steadfast public service.</strong>&#8220;   	Nancy Reagan had this to say: &#8220;<strong>Ronnie and Ted could always find common  	ground, and they had great respect for one another. In recent years, Ted and  	I found our common ground in stem cell research.</strong>&#8220;  President Obama praised Kennedy thusly:  	&#8220;<strong>His ideas and ideals are stamped on scores of laws and reflected in  	millions of lives &#8211; in seniors who know new dignity, in families that know  	new opportunity, in children who know education&#8217;s promise, and in all who  	can pursue their dream in an America that is more equal and more just &#8211;  	including myself.</strong>&#8220;  And Hillary Clinton said Kennedy was, &#8220;<strong>a legislator  	without peer</strong>&#8221; who &#8220;<strong>inspired generation after generation of young Americans  	to enter public service, to stand up for justice and to fight for progress,</strong>&#8221; while President Bill Clinton described Kennedy as having a &#8220;<strong>big heart, sharp mind and boundless  	energy&#8230;gifts he gave to make our democracy a more perfect union.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>For other Republicans&#8230;<a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/rachel-maddow-show-revisionist-history">the  	praise was much more disingenuous and often, opportunistically inaccurate</a>.   	Senators McCain, Hatch, and Gregg&#8230;used Kennedy&#8217;s passing as an excuse to  	attempt to drive a stake through health care reform, by intimating that  	compromise could not be reached without Kennedy&#8217;s help.  The three  	Republican senators have tried to paint the current failure to arrive at a  	bipartisan solution as the result of Kennedy&#8217;s lack of involvement, falling  	just short of saying that Kennedy&#8230;<em>would have given up all the parts of the  	bill they wanted him to, in order to reach agreement</em>.  Rachel Maddow does a  	good examination of this desire to make one of the most liberal members of  	the Senate look more &#8220;<em>centrist</em>.&#8221;  <strong>One</strong>&#8230;they are trying to shift the  	blame from the GOP and its unreasonable demands for concessions from the  	bill.  The truth is, if there is no bipartisanship on this bill, it has  	everything to do with them&#8230;and nothing to do with Kennedy.   	<strong>Two</strong>&#8230;they are afraid.  Afraid that people will admire Kennedy.   	Afraid that they will hear about his attempts to secure more equality for  	women, minorities, and gay citizens&#8230;that they will hear about his attempts  	to garner security and opportunity for America&#8217;s least powerful  	citizens&#8230;that the people will realize that these things are what  	liberalism is all about, and will come to the conclusion that it must,  	therefore, be a good thing.  And if there is one thing the GOP does not  	want&#8230;<strong>it is liberalism being seen as a good thing</strong>.</li>
<li>Ok&#8230;this is a little bit more bizarre than usual.  	<a href="http://vetocorleone.com/2009/08/27/ted-kennedys-death/">Here&#8217;s a  	list</a> of the &#8220;<em>8 Strangest Reactions to Kennedy&#8217;s Death.</em>&#8220;  Some are  	real doozies&#8230;and Rush made the list.  Showing his usual lack of taste  	<strong>AND</strong> sense, Rush 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/26/limbaugh-congratulates-hi_n_269711.html"> praised himself</a> for predicting Senator Kennedy&#8217;s death.  <em>Really</em>?   	Wow&#8230;who could have guessed that a 77-year-old man with a brain tumor, and  	who keeps having seizures, would die so soon&#8230;?</li>
<li><strong>I Feel Like I&#8217;m Taking Crazy Pills:</strong> With the news of Edward  	Kennedy&#8217;s passing&#8230;the <em>Conservatives for Patients Rights</em> organization 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/26/anti-health-care-reform-g_n_269920.html"> has declared</a> that it will temporarily suspend its vicious, and often  	false, attacks on the health care reform bills, out of respect for the  	senator.  Of course&#8230;it has been pointed out that this &#8220;<em>polite  	suspension of hostilities</em>&#8221; will save the group millions of dollars in ad  	money, but&#8230;<em>I&#8217;m sure that has nothing to do with it</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE GREAT HEALTH CARE DEBATE:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>We shouldn&#8217;t be surprised at reports that some doctors&#8230;are using their  	offices as &#8220;<em>bully pulpits</em>&#8221; to promote their own political agendas.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/politics-in-the-doctors-o_n_270513.html"> Here is a story</a> of a woman who went to see a specialist, only to have  	him say, &#8220;<strong>Well, we&#8217;re in a box, because I can&#8217;t give you a cortisone  	shot, because of the valley fever [an illness the patient had recently  	suffered]&#8230;Your valley fever doctor would not be happy with me. But we&#8217;re  	lucky we&#8217;re not in the Obama box, because if we were, I couldn&#8217;t treat you  	because you&#8217;re over 70.</strong>&#8220;  This is, of course, a variation on the  	wildly inaccurate &#8220;<em>death panel</em>&#8221; theme espoused by opponents of reform, and  	it does not bear any resemblance to the truth&#8230;and it goes without saying  	that the patient was none to pleased to be confronted with partisan politics  	while seeking treatment for her ills.</li>
<li><strong>You heard it here first:</strong> in a note similar to the item above, in  	both its nature and its inherent unprofessionalism&#8230;a Dean of the Vanderbilt  	School of Nursing, Colleen Conway Welch, saw fit to email <strong>ALL THE SCHOOL&#8217;S  	STUDENTS</strong> and faculty a copy of an extremely partisan, anti-reform  	document.   	The document may be viewed 	<a href="../uploads/Resources/Healthcare.pdf"> here</a>.  If you skip past the non-factual bullet items to the section  	containing the &#8220;<em>sources</em>&#8221; of the information, you will find that two bullet  	points came from the now-discredited Lewin Group (<em>a research group exposed  	as being wholly owned by United Health Care</em>), one point is attributed to the  	Heritage Foundation (<em>a partisan, right-wing &#8220;think tank&#8221;</em>), and another point  	is directly sourced to Representative John Boehner and Governor Tim Pawlenty  	(<em>who are, of course, motivated by partisan politics</em>).  Fortunately,  	another Dean saw fit to respond,  telling the students that health care  	is an important topic that they should research themselves (<em>especially for  	the sake of the 45 million Americans without proper access to care</em>)&#8230;and  	that they should certainly not be swayed <strong>by partisan, chain letter  	propaganda</strong>.</li>
<li>Representative Michele Bachmann thought it a good idea to start her town  	hall meeting with a long, pointless joke about President Obama playing golf  	with Tiger Woods&#8230;many attendees disagreed and heckled the legislator with  	chants of &#8220;<strong>Health care! Health care!</strong>&#8220;  	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Bachmann_Sometimes_we_can_sometimes_get_confused.html"> Clips here</a>.  She would later enchant the crowd with this particular  	piece of wisdom: &#8220;<strong>Sometimes we can sometimes get confused when we hear  	the terms &#8211; millions , billions, trillions.  What does that mean? Let&#8217;s  	just take an example: A million seconds is eleven and a half days. A second  	is 32 years. A trillion seconds is 32,000 years &#8211; there&#8217;s a big difference  	between billions and trillions.</strong>&#8220;   And thousands of miles  	away, Stephen Hawking threw up in his mouth a little bit, and didn&#8217;t know  	why&#8230;</li>
<li>Just yesterday, Senator Inhofe joined Senator McConnell in the  	&#8220;<strong>I-haven&#8217;t-read-the-bill-but-will-vote-against-it</strong>&#8221; club&#8230;today they 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/dem-rep-marshall-i-havent_n_270779.html"> are joined by</a> Representative Jim Marshall (D-GA), who said that we have  	to do something or health care will bankrupt the economy&#8230;and even though  	he hasn&#8217;t read either of the bills, he <strong>JUST KNOWS</strong> that they don&#8217;t contain the right  	measures, so he will oppose them.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Freshman Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins has now apologized:  at a  	recent press conference 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/26/gop-rep-republicans-strug_n_270078.html"> she stated</a> that Republicans are looking for the &#8220;<strong>great white hope</strong>&#8221;  	to come and revitalize the party.  The choice of this phrase is, of  	course, exceedingly unwise, given it entered usage during the civil rights  	era, when white Americans were looking for the &#8220;<em>great white hope</em>&#8220;&#8230;a  	white boxer that could defeat the boxing champion, Jack Johnson, who was  	black.</li>
<li>In a recent interview with NPR, RNC Chairman Michael Steele showed us  	that it is not hard to for a man who has not thought through any of his  	positions to get forced into a corner. <strong> The short version: </strong> Steele  	says insurance should be regulated&#8230;the interviewer says &#8220;<strong>wait a minute  	you would trust the government to look into that?</strong>&#8220;&#8230;to which a  	flustered Steele says, &#8220;<strong>No, I&#8217;m talking about private. I&#8217;m talking about  	citizens..,</strong>&#8221; at which point the interviewer points out the government  	regulates insurance, not private citizens&#8230;Steele says, &#8220;<strong>And so what.  	Wait a minute. Hold up. You&#8217;re doing a wonderful little dance here and  	trying to be cute.</strong>&#8220;  You can hear the entire, highly entertaining  	clip 	<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112281170"> here</a>.</li>
<li>Sarah Palin&#8230;now doing most of her communications, <em>rather bizarrely</em>,  	through Facebook, 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0809/Palin_tells_friends_Watch_Beck.html?showall"> recently posted the following</a>: &#8220;<strong>FOX News&#8217; Glenn Beck is doing an  	extraordinary job this week walking America behind the scenes of 1600  	Pennsylvania Avenue and outlining who is actually running the White House.   	Monday night he asked us to invite one friend to watch; tonight I invite all  	my friends to watch.</strong>&#8220;  That&#8217;s right&#8230;Beck is doing such an  	extraordinary job that over forty of his advertisers have left his show  	after he called the President a &#8220;<strong>racist</strong>&#8221; who has &#8220;<strong>a deep-seated  	hatred of white people.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Rex Rammell, an Idaho gubernatorial candidate, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/rex-rammell-idaho-goper-j_n_270751.html"> says he was only joking</a> when he said he&#8217;d buy a license to hunt  	President Obama.  Not funny&#8230;and arguably not legal, Mr. Rammell.   	Democratic Party Chairman Keith Roark was overly kind in saying: &#8220;<strong>Rex  	Rammell is pretty shrill, and I don&#8217;t think he represents the mainstream of  	the Republican Party by any means.</strong>&#8220;  Mr. Roark&#8230;I&#8217;m no longer  	certain that&#8217;s true.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA &#8211; HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember Mark J. Penn&#8230;the devious mastermind behind most of the more  	vicious attacks to emanate from Hillary Rodham Clinton&#8217;s presidential  	campaign?  Well, Penn is now president and chief executive of  	Burson-Marsteller, one of the world’s largest public relations firms.   	Penn <strong>ALSO</strong> writes as a columnist for the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>.  	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/business/media/28penn.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"> The problem arose</a> with Penn recently wrote a column for WSJ, about &#8220;<em>luxury  	camping</em>&#8221; and the impact it could have on the hotel/sporting good/travel  	industries.  After posting this column&#8230;Penn&#8217;s company sends an  	internal email&#8230;suggesting they should use Penn&#8217;s article as an excuse to  	contact hotel/sporting good/travel industries for their business.   	While to you and I this appears to be a fairly clear example of a legal  	conflict of interest, but &#8220;<em>not so</em>&#8221; says the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>:  	&#8220;<strong>the reality is that freelancers do use their columns as ways of  	marketing themselves.</strong>&#8220;  Ummm&#8230;&#8221;<em>marketing themselves</em>&#8221; is  	perfectly fine&#8230;marketing their companies&#8217; products and/or services&#8230;not  	so much.</li>
<li>A guest on Sean Hannity&#8217;s Fox News show, 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teI634Ugs-U&amp;feature=player_embedded"> compares the Obama administration to the Nazis</a>: &#8220;<strong>National Socialism  	is very much what we see today in this administration, it&#8217;s a policy almost  	line for line. It&#8217;s the same economic policy, it&#8217;s the same political  	policy. And so if they want to talk about Nazis, they better be careful  	about that conversation because they might find that the swastika is on  	their own arm.</strong>&#8220;  Hannity&#8217;s response to this:  &#8220;<strong>Ok</strong>.&#8221;   	Sean Hannity, folks&#8230;continuing to lower the bar of &#8220;<em>responsible  	journalism,</em>&#8221; one notch at a time.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GHOSTS OF OUR PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The Pentagon&#8230;is profiling journalists.  	<a href="http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;article=64401">Newly  	released files</a> prove that, despite the Pentagon&#8217;s claims that reporters  	were not &#8220;<em>graded</em>&#8221; on their coverage of military events, the Pentagon has  	been assessing members of the media as &#8220;<strong>positive</strong>,&#8221; &#8220;<strong>neutral</strong>,&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>negative</strong>.&#8221;   	So-called &#8220;<strong>neutral</strong>&#8221; reporters were seen as malleable:  a potentially  	negative story could be &#8220;<strong>softened</strong>&#8221; just by spoonfeeding them some positive  	quotes.  Meanwhile, if an action occurred that was a success and the  	Pentagon wanted to get maximum &#8220;<em>mileage</em>&#8221; out of it&#8230;they just had to  	present it to one of the reporters they knew to be &#8220;<strong>positive</strong>&#8221; and  	&#8220;<strong>subjective</strong>.&#8221;</li>
<li>Earlier this week, we covered the disturbing number of Bush-era policies  	that President Obama has kept in place&#8230;or even expanded.  Well, 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/27/AR2009082704065.html"> add another</a> to the list:  the Obama administration has chosen to  	preserve the controversial policy that allows the government to search your  	laptop computer, cellphone, or any other electronic media&#8230;<em>without probable  	cause or warrant</em> while you are travelling.  Elizabeth Goitein, of the  	nonprofit Brennan Center for Justice says, &#8220;<strong>Under the policy begun by  	Bush and now continued by Obama, the government can open your laptop and  	read your medical records, financial records, e-mails, work product and  	personal correspondence &#8211; all without any suspicion of illegal activity.</strong>&#8220;   	The ACLU and other civil liberties groups have responded as would be  	expected.</li>
<li>The release of the Inspector General&#8217;s report on American interrogation  	practices during the Bush administration, has caused many conservatives and  	conservative media outlets to proclaim that &#8220;<em>torture works</em>,&#8221; simply because  	the report shows that the torture produced &#8220;<em>information</em>.&#8221;  Well,  	Frances Fragos Townsend, Homeland Security adviser and close, personal  	adviser to President Bush  	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/torture/top-bush-terrorism-adviser-admits-cia-docs-didnt-prove-torture-worked/">states otherwise</a>.  Townsend responds, &#8220;<strong>It’s very difficult to draw a cause and effect, because it’s not  		clear when techniques were applied vs. when that information was  		received.</strong> <strong>It’s implicit. It seems, when you read the report, that we  		got the &#8211; the &#8211; the most critical information after techniques had been  		applied. But the report doesn’t say that.</strong>&#8220;  Oh yeah&#8230;and lest  	we forget:  it wouldn&#8217;t even matter if it <strong>DID</strong> work&#8230;it would  	still be <strong>ILLEGAL</strong> according to federal and international law.</li>
<li>Remember months ago, when former Vice President Cheney said that  	releasing the CIA documents would show that torture had been very effective?   	Well, they did not show that to be true at all&#8230;and they also showed him to  	be a liar when he said, &#8220;<strong>The professionals involved in that program were  	very, very cautious, very careful &#8211; wouldn’t do anything without making  	certain it was authorized and that it was legal&#8230;and any suggestion to the  	contrary is just wrong. Did it produce the desired results? I think it did.</strong>&#8220;   	The 	<a href="http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/08/26/report-reveals-cheney-misled/"> report clearly shows</a> just the opposite:  these &#8220;<em>professionals</em>&#8221;  	were not cautious, not careful, and did quite a bit that was  	unauthorized&#8230;and it <strong>DID NOT</strong> produce the desired results.   	You&#8217;re batting .000, Dick.</li>
</ul>
<p>That wraps up another week.  A special thanks to <a href="http://libraryatheist.wordpress.com/">The Library Atheist</a> blog, who  linked to yesterday&#8217;s post&#8230;be sure to check them out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-goodbye-teddy-pentagon-profiling-and-a-bad-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

