<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Representative King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/representative-king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Politicizes All, Including Tragedy&#8230;And Other Topics</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-politicizes-all-including-tragedy-and-other-topics/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-politicizes-all-including-tragedy-and-other-topics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Hood Tragedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox and Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome Corsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back!  The RLF has been on hiatus this week, attending to other matters.  So, we thought we'd take some time today to focus on links related to three general categories of recent events and revelations:  The Health Care Carnival Of Despair, The Politicization of Everything, The Recent Elections.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back!  The RLF has been on hiatus this week, attending to other  matters.  So, we thought we&#8217;d take some time today to focus on links  related to three general categories of recent events and revelations:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>First, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and the Republicans <strong> DEMANDED</strong> that the current Democrats&#8217; health care bill be posted online  	for 72 hours prior to the vote.  Boehner quickly, and sheepishly, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/29/boehner-gop-72-hours/">backed  	down</a> when asked if the GOP would do likewise with their bill.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> <strong>The problem:</strong></span> they had no bill.  They&#8217;d been claiming  	for over six months that they had their own plan&#8230;but had produced nothing.   	Zip.  <em>Bubkus</em>.  Even conservative economists 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/mccain-economist-gop-will_n_342324.html"> start voicing their concerns</a>: without a GOP alternative bill&#8230;they look 	<strong>REALLY</strong> bad, especially going into the 2010 and 2012 elections.   	On CNN, Boehner gets even more defensive&#8230;when cornered, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/01/boehner-on-lack-of-gop-he_n_341404.html"> the best he can offer</a> is that they have &#8220;<strong>eight or nine ideas about  	how to make our current health care system better.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Then&#8230;<em>a miracle</em>:  the GOP 	<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125711811707721639.html">announces</a> it will be releasing its own health care reform bill.  Now, remember  	the stimulus debate?  Remember how the Democrats had a plan and the  	Republicans didn&#8217;t?  Remember how the Republicans then made themselves  	look even <strong>WORSE</strong>, by claiming they had a plan&#8230;and it turned out to  	be just a flimsy political statement with no numbers, no data, no specifics?   	Well&#8230;they surely wouldn&#8217;t make that mistake again&#8230;oh wait, <em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/03/boehners-health-care-bill_n_343792.html"> I guess they did</a></em>.  Their &#8220;<em>triumphant</em>&#8221; alternative to the  	Democrats&#8217; health care bill?  It doesn&#8217;t force insurance companies to  	insure people with pre-existing conditions (<em>something the GOP has claimed  	to support</em>), it wouldn&#8217;t provide insurance to a <strong>SINGLE</strong> one of the 	<strong>FORTY MILLION</strong> uninsured people in this country, and&#8230;wait for  	it&#8230;it costs <strong>MORE</strong> than the Democrats&#8217; plan.  Wow&#8230;less  	benefit&#8230;more cost&#8230;way to show us all that you&#8217;ve really embraced the  	whole &#8220;<em>fiscal conservatism and responsibility</em>&#8221; thing.</li>
<li>Now, if you&#8217;re like me, you might well ask: With the soaring price of  	health care, the number of uninsured, and the number of people dying because  	they are uninsured&#8230;why would the GOP put out a plan that fails to address 	<strong>ANY</strong> of these problems?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The answer:</strong></span> They  	don&#8217;t admit to the problems&#8230;or they simply don&#8217;t care.   	Representative Steve King (R-IA) 	<a href="http://iowaindependent.com/21813/steve-kings-response-to-question-on-uninsured-americans-people-want-freedom"> was asked</a> how many people in his district were uninsured and could only  	mutter, &#8220;<strong>My district&#8230;The people in my district are calling for freedom.</strong>&#8220;   	House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) said that the recent, full  	endorsement of the Democrats&#8217; plan by the AARP and the AMA 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/cantor-scoffs-at-aarp-and_n_347430.html"> doesn&#8217;t mean anything</a> to him or the other Republicans.  <em>That&#8217;s  	right:</em> The largest groups representing seniors and doctors, groups that  	almost always lean heavily conservative and have usually opposed health  	reform in the past&#8230;they back the bill, and it&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: underline;">meaningless</span> to  	Cantor and the GOP.  Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) showed he didn&#8217;t care <strong> AT ALL</strong> when he said earlier this week that he doesn&#8217;t see what the  	problem is&#8230;because &#8220;<strong>everyone can show up at the hospital.</strong>&#8220;   	Jim&#8230;those emergency room visits by the uninsured are one of the number one  	financial drains on the system, and if you were paying <strong>ANY</strong> attention,  	you&#8217;d know that:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qZIr6w1_AVU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qZIr6w1_AVU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZIr6w1_AVU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZIr6w1_AVU</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE POLITICIZATION OF&#8230;WELL&#8230;EVERYTHING:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Have you noticed?</em> It seems that the GOP/RNC/FOX are willing  	to politicize anything?  Shamelessly&#8230;and in a way that, if the  	Democrats did so, they would certainly be positively <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>livid</strong></span>?   	A few very current examples follow&#8230;</li>
<li>Yesterday, something truly awful happened.  At Fort Hood, Texas, a  	soldier went on a shooting spree. When the dust settled, thirteen people  	lost their lives&#8230;thirty-one people were wounded&#8230;many more would be  	emotionally scarred&#8230;and conservatives, well, they saw the usual  	opportunity to make political hay from the tragedy.  It started with  	cries of &#8220;<em>terrorism</em>,&#8221; even from 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/06/allen-west-gop-candidate_n_348248.html"> some GOP members</a>. Then when they found out the shooter was a soldier, a  	Muslim soldier, their cries changed to &#8220;<em>domestic terrorism!</em>&#8220;  <em> World Net Daily</em>&#8216;s Jerome Corsi, renowned for creating conspiracy  	theories out of thin air with no regard for reality, quickly 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/06/iwndis-jerome-corsi-claim_n_348461.html"> claimed</a> that the shooter, Nidal Malik Hasan, had <strong>ADVISED</strong> Barack  	Obama.  Turns out that Hasan only attended a seminar as an audience  	member, that was held by a task force that advises Obama&#8230;but that&#8217;s close  	enough for Corsi.  <em>Fox &amp; Friends</em> <a href="http://rawstory.com/2009/11/fox-host-suggests-special-screenings/"> explored</a> the idea of whether or not there should be &#8220;<strong>special  	screenings</strong>&#8221; for Muslims that serve in the military, and Gretchen Carlson  	floated the idea that if not for &#8220;<strong>political correctness</strong>&#8221; towards  	Muslims, Hasan might have been stopped.  This should sound  	familiar&#8230;conservatives often use &#8220;<em>anti-political correctness</em>&#8221;  	arguments to justify racial profiling and other discriminatory tactics used  	against &#8220;<em>non-white, non-Christian</em>&#8221; Americans.  Today, I already  	spotted conservative friends parroting this talking point on  	Facebook&#8230;condemning the supposed &#8220;<em>pc mentality</em>&#8221; that they hold  	truly responsible for the killings.  It was Geraldo Rivera that stepped  	in to point out that it was more likely &#8220;<strong>government bureaucracy</strong>&#8221; and  	not &#8220;<strong>political correctness</strong>.&#8221;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Comment:</strong></span> you  	know your talk show is more than a little flaky&#8230;when <strong>GERALDO RIVERA</strong> is serving as the &#8220;<em>voice of reason.</em>&#8220;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Interesting side  	note:</strong></span> the military also appears to have trouble keeping biker  	and street gang members out&#8230;not because of &#8220;<em>pc</em>&#8221; <strong>OR</strong> &#8220;<em>bureaucracy</em>&#8220;&#8230;but  	because they are so desperate for new recruits.</li>
<li>Want to know what happens when you&#8217;re enough of a jackass to politicize  	rape?  Senator David Vitter (R-LA) was one of the GOP senators to vote  	against Senator Al Franken&#8217;s recent bill, that would force government  	contractors to allow their employees to report rape or harassment.   	Here&#8217;s what happened when Vitter runs into a victim of rape:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/r6YZ1wP1978&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/r6YZ1wP1978&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6YZ1wP1978">www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6YZ1wP1978</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>How do you politicize the stimulus package?  Well first&#8230;you call  	it &#8220;<em>socialism</em>&#8221; and say you&#8217;ll refuse to accept it in your state.   	Then, of course, <strong><em>you accept it</em></strong>.  Then you travel amongst  	your constituents, taking credit for all the jobs and programs that it  	creates/saves.  Then&#8230;you pronounce the plan a &#8220;<em>failure</em>&#8221; and  	apply third-grade level math to the numbers to &#8220;<em>prove</em>&#8221; your point.   	For example, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/fact-check-gop-math-suspe_n_341930.html"> the latest GOP &#8220;<em>numbers</em>&#8220;</a>&#8230;subtract <em>some</em> of the  	benefits created by the stimulus from the total cost of the bill&#8230;and they  	claim the amount left over is the &#8220;<em>shortfall</em>.&#8221;  The problem with  	this, besides the obvious over-simplification&#8230;the cost of plan is divided  	over <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ten years,</strong></span> but they are only subtracting <strong>ONE</strong> year&#8217;s worth of benefits.  As one writer put it, &#8220;<strong>it&#8217;s as if the  	10-year cost of George W. Bush&#8217;s big tax cuts were compared with the  	benefits to the economy that only accrued during the first year.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Swine Flu?  Ready for &#8220;<em>politicization</em>,&#8221; if you ask the  	Republicans.  Representative Joe &#8220;<em>You Lie</em>&#8221; Wilson (R-SC) 	<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/joe-wilson-says-obama-has-put-the-lives-of-americans-at-risk-due-to-h1n1-vaccine-shortage.php"> recently attempted</a> to blame the shortage of H1N1 vaccines on President  	Obama (<em>all experts cite supply problems</em>).  <em><strong>Perhaps Joe  	forgot:</strong></em> He voted <span style="text-decoration: underline;">against</span> vaccine funding.  Why is he so  	upset now&#8230;when he obviously didn&#8217;t think it was too important back when  	they were voting for the funding?  Oh yeah&#8230;<strong>his wife has Swine Flu</strong>.  	It&#8217;s the two things you guys <strong>NEVER</strong> seem to understand, Joe:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> First</span>, it is always better to spend some money up front to <strong>PREVENT</strong> something from happening&#8230;than it is to pay a lot of money and tears <strong> AFTER</strong> it has already happened.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Second</span>, that thing you don&#8217;t  	want to help &#8220;<em>the other guy</em>&#8221; with, because it&#8217;ll never happen to you?   	Yes, it can happen to you.</li>
<li>Remember the census worker who was found hanged?  The conservative  	officials of that county, rather than admit that the violent, anti-census  	rhetoric of some GOP legislators and FOX News may have claimed an actual  	victim&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">are still treating the case as if it might be a suicide</span>.   	That&#8217;s right, instead of admitting that some goofball got swept up in the  	anti-government incitement of Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and  	Glenn Beck&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/bill-sparkman-kentucky-ce_n_347851.html">they&#8217;re  	saying</a> that this poor guy probably stripped naked, carved &#8220;<em>FED</em>&#8221;  	on his own chest, duct-taped his hands, and hanged himself in a public area.</li>
<li>She was the GOP&#8217;s darling.  When Carrie PreJean lost the Miss  	America pageant, after answering that she did not support gay marriage,  	conservatives shouted &#8220;<em>political correctness at work!</em>&#8220;  They  	invited her to speak at conservative fundraisers, Republican events, and  	other gatherings&#8230;and she would regale them with tears and nonsensical  	statements about her First Amendment rights being violated (<em>ummm&#8230;Carrie&#8230;the  	government never stopped you from saying <strong>ANYTHING</strong></em>).  But  	now&#8230;it&#8217;s amazing how 	<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/"> one little SEX TAPE</a>, and you&#8217;re just not the spokesperson they were  	looking for anymore.  It&#8217;s so hard to maintain the appearance of  	holding the high ground&#8230;well, especially with all the affairs&#8230;oh, and  	the hooker scandals&#8230;oh, yeah, and don&#8217;t forget the little boys, and the  	airport bathrooms&#8230;.oh, heh, and getting caught in the cemetery with a hooker <strong>AND</strong> sex toys.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>I&#8217;ll keep this brief:</strong></span> Want to know how best to  	politicize health care reform?  Ask Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT).   	He tried to put 	<a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-religion3-2009nov03,0,6879249,full.story"> an amendment</a> into the health care legislation, that would force  	insurance to treat medical treatment and &#8220;<strong>Christian Science prayer  	treatments</strong>&#8220;&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>EQUALLY</strong></span>.  Some have said that this  	would violate the &#8220;<em>Separation of Church and State.</em>&#8220;  Duh.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE RECENT ELECTION&#8230;EVERYBODY WANTS TO TELL YOU WHAT IT MEANT:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Did you even know there were elections this week?  If you did, it  	was because the media certainly wanted you to get into all the &#8220;<em>drama</em>&#8221;  	they generated about them.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>I&#8217;ll provide the short version:</strong></span> Two governors races&#8230;one with a wildly unpopular Democrat who is rich, tied  	to Wall Street, and who failed to make good on promises of tax cuts.   	The other governor race&#8230;Virginia: <em>Enough said</em>.  There were  	also two state legislative races, one in a New York district that has voted  	Republican for more than one hundred years, and the other race in  	California.  Now if you listened to conservative/liberal/moderate  	media&#8230;these races would tell <strong>EXACTLY</strong> how American feels about  	President Obama, Republicans, and Democrats.  Well&#8230;<em>not really</em>.  	<em>Read on.</em></li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE RESULTS</strong></span>:  The Republican candidate beat the  	unpopular/rich/Goldman Sachs Democrat for the New Jersey governorship.   	The Republican beat the Democrat for the governorship of Virginia, for  	obvious reasons involving, <em>well</em>, Virginia.  The Democratic  	candidate won the California legislative seat, and the Democratic candidate  	won the seat in the highly conservative New York district.   Oh  	yeah&#8230;and Mayor Michael Bloomberg managed to buy back his office as  	mayor&#8230;<em>but few people cared</em>.  In truth, only one of these  	races, the New York legislative race, even involves <strong>ANYTHING</strong> worth  	talking about.  So what did the &#8220;<em>liberal</em>&#8221; media report:   	headlines everywhere reported a &#8220;<em>Republican Sweep</em>,&#8221; and proclaimed  	this a sign of the &#8220;<em>disillusionment of voters</em>&#8221; with the president.   	Stop&#8230;<strong>roll back the tape</strong>&#8230;<em>what was that?</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/the-state-of-your-post-el_n_345377.html"> Is the media so desperate</a> to create sensationalism and conflict&#8230;that  	they would proclaim the GOP &#8220;<em>reborn, revitalized, and ready to rumble</em>,&#8221;  	based on <strong>THESE</strong> election results?  Jon Stewart of The Daily Show  	tackled the issue of the media&#8217;s coverage:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254850" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254850" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>As I said, the New York legislative race was the one that was at all &#8220;<em>revealing</em>.&#8221;  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The short and sweet:</strong></span> GOP offers up a candidate, endorsed  	by House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), and the Democrats do likewise  	(<em>but the Democrats know they have <strong>NO</strong> change of winning the seat</em>).   	Sarah Palin, and the &#8220;<em>wing-nut brigade,</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/palin-tea-partiers-focus_n_342219.html"> throw their support</a> behind an &#8220;<em>Conservative Party</em>&#8221; goofball who 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/03/doug-hoffman-calls-glenn_n_343676.html"> adores Glenn Beck</a> (<em>even calls him a &#8220;mentor&#8221;</em>), and who doesn&#8217;t  	even live in the district.  Rush Limbaugh 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/limbaugh-scozzafava-guilt_n_342535.html"> accuses the GOP candidate</a> of committing &#8220;<strong>widespread bestiality.</strong>&#8220;   	Boehner and other Republicans hedge on whether they now support <strong>THEIR</strong> candidate, or the conservative goofball.  The Republican  	candidate&#8230;she gets disgusted by her own party, and throws her support  	behind the Democratic candidate&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/03/bill-owens-leads-doug-hof_n_344776.html">who  	then wins the election</a>.  	<a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B287C056-18FE-70B2-A88C6D5F0E6061E5"> Some say</a> the current attempts by conservative purists to oust <strong>ANY</strong> Republican candidates who are 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/are-moderates-no-longer-w_n_342076.html"> at all moderate</a>, or even simply reasonable&#8230;is a mistake.  At  	least, looking at these results&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>they appear to be correct</strong></span>.</li>
<li>If there is one thing Republicans <strong>SHOULD</strong> know by now&#8230;it&#8217;s that  	they can&#8217;t look to RNC chairman Michael Steele for sound guidance.   	After the elections, Steele first 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/steele-reports-of-ideolog_n_345319.html"> proclaimed</a> that there are <strong>NO</strong> ideological divisions within the  	Republican Party (<em>which we clearly know now to be false</em>)&#8230;<strong>THEN</strong>,  	Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/steele-election-results-s_n_345069.html"> calls</a> the results of the elections evidence that the GOP is now &#8220;<strong>transcendent</strong>&#8220;&#8230;<strong>THEN</strong> Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/quick-reversal-steele-we_n_347647.html"> admits</a> that all the intra-party fighting (which he said did exist) was &#8220;<strong>stupid</strong>&#8221;  	and that it was causing them to &#8220;<strong>screw</strong>&#8221; themselves.  Steele  	would find out what it is like to be truly screwed, when he was interviewed  	on Morning Joe alongside Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell&#8230;who congratulated him on  	leading his &#8220;<strong>party to a disastrous loss:</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gcYuJX-hzQo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gcYuJX-hzQo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcYuJX-hzQo">www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcYuJX-hzQo</a></p></p>
<p>Hopefully we&#8217;ll be back to more regular, consistent posting next week.   Have a great weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-politicizes-all-including-tragedy-and-other-topics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Hunting Liberals, President King, and Going Rouge</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Sportsmens Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Gaffney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rouge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Spooner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's Friday...and that means it is time for our weekly "Chaos Theory" installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of political topics ranging from the sublime to the sublimely absurd...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Friday&#8230;and that means it is time for our weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221;  installment of the RLF blog, where we gather together links on a variety of  political topics ranging from the sublime to the <em>sublimely absurd</em>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and there are always plenty of links, <em>so let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Representative Gregg Harper&#8217;s (R-MS) organization, the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus, has been recently called &#8220;<strong>bipartisan</strong>&#8221; by Senator Ben  	Nelson (D-NE).  When 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0910/get_to_know_a_congressman4.html"> asked by Polico&#8217;s reporter</a>, &#8220;<strong>What in the world does the Congressional  	Sportsmen&#8217;s Caucus do</strong>,&#8221; one might reasonably expect would be an answer along  	the lines of, &#8220;<em>we support the rights and interests of sportsmen, fishermen,  	and hunters, in Congress.</em>&#8220;  What one might <strong>NOT</strong> expect, was Harper&#8217;s  	response: &#8220;<strong>We hunt liberal, tree-hugging Democrats, although it does  	seem like a waste of good ammunition.</strong>&#8220;  Very nice&#8230;very  	responsible&#8230;<em>very</em> bipartisan.</li>
<li>Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN), known most for conspiracy  	theories verging on the truly bizarre, has declared that she will not run  	for the presidency in 2012.  Which makes sense&#8230;since she may not even  	be able to win re-election for the seat she currently holds, as the  	residents of her district have grown more than a bit weary of her  	embarrassing statements, and the negative attention they attract.   	However, Bachmann 	<a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/47697/bachmann-says-no-to-white-house-run-want-rep-steve-king-instead"> did provide an interesting recommendation</a> for who she thinks <strong>SHOULD</strong> run:   	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Representative Steve King (R-IA)</span>.  That&#8217;s right&#8230;she&#8217;s recommending  	the man who brought us such hits as being 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/08/rep-steve-king-lone-vote_n_227866.html"> the only vote</a> against a resolution stating that it was wrong to use  	slaves to build our Capitol,  sponsoring his own resolution &#8220;<strong>recognizing  	the importance of Christians and the Christian faith</strong>,&#8221; and very recently  	stating that gay rights are a &#8220;<strong>purely socialist concept</strong>.&#8221;  Way to  	really think it through, Michele&#8230;he is a <em>winner</em>.</li>
<li>I guess Republicans just <strong>LOVE</strong> Twitter.  	<a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/blogtalk-twitter-and-the-gop/"> It&#8217;s also being reported</a>&#8230;that they love setting up fake Twitter  	accounts and webpages, where they pretend to be particular Democratic  	legislators and candidates.  They then use these fraudulent accounts to  	misinform and offend voters.  Twitter has caught on and is trying to  	close all the accounts being used by Republicans in this way.  I think  	I may know why they like Twitter more than actual blogs:  on Twitter  	nobody expects you to actually use <em>facts</em> and defend your position&#8230;you  	can get  	away with just blurting out a few words of nonsense.</li>
<li>The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee 	<a href="http://dscc.org/gopplan">has put out an ad</a>, claiming that  	Republicans have wasted over 1,000 hours in the Senate, through exploitation  	of parliamentary rules and procedures.  The DSCC does little to show  	how they arrived at this figure&#8230;but I would guess that much of what the  	GOP has fought for in Congress also qualifies as a waste of time.  <em>Need  	examples?</em> This clip, a spoof on the iPhone commercials, has been  	making the internet rounds, and I think it nicely sums up the kinds of  	platforms and positions the GOP is using to distract our attention, delay  	progress, and otherwise hinder real issues from being addressed:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e_IAN081P8I&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I">www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_IAN081P8I</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>A Telling List:</strong> Want to see clips of the &#8220;<em>Top Ten Distortions  	Perpetrated By FOX News?</em>&#8220;  Well look no further than 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/the-ten-most-egregious-fo_n_327140.html"> this link</a>.  It includes such highlights as accusing an Obama czar  	of condoning statutory rape, editing a clip of Joe Biden quoting John  	McCain&#8230;so that it appeared as if Biden said the quote, editing a clip of  	Barack Obama so it appeared that he supported a European-style health care  	system&#8230;when he was actually opposing the idea, <strong>AND</strong> directly repeating,  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">verbatim</span>, GOP talking points as if they were news.  <em>Enjoy</em>&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 1:</strong> A Hollywood charity is mounting a push to  	encourage more Americans to volunteer.  Since Obama has also supported  	volunteerism as important, Glenn Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/glenn-beck-slams-obama-en_n_326632.html"> could only imagine one thing</a>:  That Obama is using Hollywood&#8230;<em>to  	turn us into Communist China</em>.  No, I&#8217;m serious&#8230;here&#8217;s what he said: &#8220;<strong>Celebrities  	are coming together to make it cool to volunteer. Disney gives you a free  	day at the park. This is all fine, but doesn&#8217;t it seem a little bit  	convenient that all of this comes out now at the same time the Obama  	administration is calling for it? Obama controls the message through the  	media he holds in his pocket. Or in his little hand. And soon if you  	disobey, he&#8217;ll just go [Beck slaps his hand]. Now the message will be  	embedded in television shows. Isn&#8217;t this great? Aren&#8217;t you proud of what  	we&#8217;re doing? Oh, this certainly is change.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><strong>Glenn Beck, Part 2:</strong> Why is it that every time I write about  	something Glenn Beck said, I feel the need to also say, &#8220;<em>No really&#8230;that&#8217;s  	what he said?</em>&#8220;  Well, Beck was busy this week providing more ammunition  	for whomever is filling out the civil commitment papers on him, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/glenn-beck-smears-progres_n_327860.html"> claiming</a> that progressives/liberals&#8230;<em>wait for it</em>&#8230;have historically  	tried to take away everyone&#8217;s individual liberties, and could also be called  	&#8220;<strong>tyrants</strong>&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>slave holders</strong>.&#8221;  &lt;&lt;Sigh&gt;&gt;&#8230;</li>
<li>Neocon Frank Gaffney has claimed in the past that Obama was some sort of  	&#8220;s<em>ecret Muslim</em>,&#8221; that there is evidence connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and  	the Oklahoma City bombing (<em>there isn&#8217;t, of course, and shame on you if you  	didn&#8217;t know that</em>), that Sarah Palin learned foreign policy just by <em>living</em> in  	Alaska, that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (<em>but that the  	media hid this &#8220;fact&#8221; from us</em>), and that Democratic officials who criticized  	former President George W. Bush&#8230;should be hanged.  I tell you all  	this&#8230;so it will be of no surprise that Gaffney has no more decency than he  	has sense.  In a recent appearance on Hardball with Chris Matthews, he  	told Ron Reagan&#8230;<strong>that his father would be ashamed of him:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rMOBQZwDMAE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMOBQZwDMAE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>John Stossel of the FOX Business Channel recently condemned Lou Dobbs&#8217;,  	of CNN, for Dobb&#8217;s ongoing &#8220;<strong>rants about immigrants wrecking America.</strong>&#8220;   	Dobbs has now responded, and rather unkindly: &#8220;<strong>Fox Business News  	- their new hire John Stossel -- weighing in  		with his own brand of myopic idiocy and no information whatsoever sat  		down with self-described rodeo clown Glenn Beck…what a self-important  		ass</strong><strong>…He doesn’t understand basic economics…He’s just a silly  	little trick waiting to do some sort of Libertarian flip&#8230;Immigrants wrecking America  	-  I’ve never said anything close to that.  		As a matter of fact, I embrace immigrants to this country, I welcome  		them, I want more -- and as a matter of public policy, we need them. </strong> <strong>In no way am I restrictionist, and to hear this ass continue his  		act over at Fox News. I just can’t wait until he starts blowing bubbles  		in the air -- that’s about all he’s equipped to do.</strong>&#8220;   	That&#8217;s right Lou, you never said the &#8220;<em>immigrants are wrecking America</em>&#8220;&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">except  	the time</a> you accused them of bringing leprosy here&#8230;oh, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/">or the  	time</a> you claimed they were forming a conspiracy to take back their old  	national territory&#8230;oh, and 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/23/lou-dobbs-john-stossel/"> remember the time</a> you said they were a threat to the entire middle  	class, and working people everywhere?  Dobbs&#8230;before you start trying  	to play &#8220;<em>friend to the immigrant</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>holier than thou</em>&#8221; with John Stossel&#8230;you  	might want to watch some your own clips on YouTube.</li>
<li>How better to wrap up the &#8220;<em>Media Gone Wild</em>&#8221; segment of the post, than  	with an Ann Coulter item.  During her appearance on Joy Behar&#8217;s talk  	show, she stated that all Presidential assassins have been liberals: &#8220;<strong>As  	I have not only witnessed in my own life but described in &#8216;Guilty&#8217;, every  	presidential assassination or attempted presidential assassination was  	committed by some kind of left-wing loon, communist, anarchist,  	communitarian, or they had no politics at all.</strong>&#8220;  Behar attempts to  	point out that this statement is indefensible and patently false&#8230;but Ms.  	Coulter has never been the one to stop talking so that someone else can  	point out <strong>HOW WRONG SHE IS</strong>:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LHBR8GYwtiM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBR8GYwtiM</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>COURTESY OF THE PENTAGON AND THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Apparently, there are at least 220 detainees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval  	Prison&#8230;which have been found to have had no ties to terrorism, 9/11, or to  	pose any other kind of threat to the United States&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>but we&#8217;re still keeping  	them in prison</strong></span>.  The Supreme Court 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/guantanamo-uighurs-rights_n_327027.html"> is preparing to look at this problem</a>&#8230;yet another in a list of how  	Bush&#8217;s use of the military prison conflicts with seemingly <strong>EVERY</strong> aspect of  	Due Process listed in our Constitution.  <em>A reminder:</em> the  	base/prison is technically &#8220;<em>American soil</em>&#8221; and the Constitution does not say  	that it applies only to &#8220;<em>citizens</em>&#8221; but rather to all &#8220;<strong>persons</strong>.&#8221;  On a  	related note, a group called <em>New Security Action</em>, with the support of a  	number of retired generals and other veterans, 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYN6yeRWYbI&amp;feature=player_embedded"> has released a series of ads</a> pointing out that Congress should step  	aside and allow Gitmo, which has come to represent nearly everything wrong  	about the Bush-Cheney way of thinking, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">to be closed</span>.</li>
<li><strong>No surprise:</strong> Turns out the Pentagon was engaged in a highly  	organized program to sell the American people on the Iraq War and other Bush  	security policies.  <strong>Big surprise:</strong> Well&#8230;it wasn&#8217;t so much an &#8220;<em>ad  	campaign</em>&#8221; or a &#8220;<em>public relations program</em>&#8220;&#8230;as it was 	<a href="http://rawstory.com/2009/10/bryan-whitman-2/">a series of  	psychological experiments</a> being performed on the American citizenry.   	<strong>Bonus surprise:</strong> One of the chief architects of this program?  He  	still works at the Pentagon in the same position.  Scully&#8230;Mulder&#8230;<em>where  	are you when we need you?</em></li>
<li>Most people were a bit surprised at the unmitigated gall of the 30  	Senate Republicans who voted against Senator Franken&#8217;s (D-MN) bill, which  	would punish government contractors if they tried to keep employees from  	reporting rape.  Turns out, <em>they&#8217;ve got company</em> -- the Defense  	Department 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/defense-department-oppose_n_326569.html"> also doesn&#8217;t like the bill</a>&#8230;because they would hate to have to do  	without KBR, Blackwater, and other companies that threaten/coerce/bribe  	victims of rape to be silent.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Amidst all the talk about a &#8220;<em>public option</em>,&#8221; few are paying  	attention to a development almost as big.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/senate-dems-aim-to-strip_n_328362.html"> Democrats are very close</a> to being able to strip away the anti-trust  	exemption given long ago to the health insurance companies, which has  	allowed them to behave as a monopoly.  Want to know why this is so  	important?  We know how the free market is <strong>SUPPOSED</strong> to  	work&#8230;but when a company is allowed to monopolize an industry or a region,  	then there is no competition to force the company to have fair pricing and  	offer good service&#8230;which leads to our situation today where the health  	insurance companies have high rates, giant profits, deny service, and  	mistreat customers.  Also&#8230;<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/health_competition_map.html">check  	out this map</a>.  <strong>Yes, it&#8217;s disgusting:</strong> most states&#8217; residents, 	<strong>RIGHT NOW</strong>, only have <strong>ONE</strong> or <strong>TWO</strong> insurers that they are 	<strong>ALLOWED</strong> to choose from.  &#8220;<em>Free Market Capitalists</em>&#8220;&#8230;are  	you listening?</li>
<li>First it was &#8220;<em>fat babies</em>.&#8221;  Then it was &#8220;<em>thin babies</em>.&#8221;   	Then it was &#8220;<em>spousal abuse</em>.&#8221;  What new excuse for denying  	coverage did we find out about now?  Yup&#8230;insurance companies, almost  	all of them, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/insurance-companies-rape-_n_328708.html"> will not allow you to purchase a policy</a> with them if you have been  	treated for <strong>RAPE</strong>.  To them&#8230;it&#8217;s just another &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>The push for the public option is in full swing, and polls show it is  	working.  More of the public supports it each day, the House is within  	about <strong>EIGHT</strong> votes of being able to pass it, and we heard the 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/23/reid-is-only-one-or-two-v_n_331652.html"> surprising news</a> today that the Senate may be within <strong>TWO</strong> votes.  	<em>Seriously</em>: <strong>TWO VOTES</strong>.  Here&#8217;s a new ad, featuring Heather  	Graham, explaining why the option is necessary:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bvaJYYeXf70&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70">www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Interesting fact courtesy of Representative Anthony Weiner (D-NY):</span> <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/10/23/weiner-calls-gop-opponents-public-option-give-up-their-medicare"> 55 of the Republicans</a> opposing the public option because it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>government-run</em>&#8221;  	or &#8220;<em>socialism</em>&#8220;&#8230;they&#8217;re currently <strong>ON</strong> <strong>MEDICARE</strong>.   	Weiner says, &#8220;<strong>Even in a town known for hypocrisy, this list of 55 Members  	of Congress deserve some sort of prize. They apparently think the public  	option is ok for them, but not anyone else.</strong>&#8220;  Yes, indeed.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GAY RIGHTS&#8230;OR THE LACK THEREOF:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wow</strong>:  It&#8217;s rare that someone actually <strong>ADMITS</strong> that their argument  	against gay rights and/or gay marriage is hollow and baseless.  Ross Douthat,  	conservative columnist for the New York Times, was asked while sitting on a  	panel for &#8220;<em>young, bright, neo-cons</em>&#8221; what he thought about gay marriage.  	<a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/media/n1-panel-cat-got-douthats-tongue-topic-gay-marriage"> His response</a>:  &#8220;<strong>I am someone opposed to gay marriage who is  	deeply uncomfortable arguing the issue in public.</strong>&#8220;  He explained  	that his reason for feeling &#8220;<strong>uncomfortable</strong>&#8221; discussing the subject,  	was because his argument against it is purely religious, and that it  	therefore represents &#8220;<strong>a losing argument.</strong>&#8220;  He even went so far  	as to recognize that because he is embarrassed that he has no real, factual  	objection to gay marriage&#8230;and because he is embarrassed to say what his  	objection really is&#8230;perhaps that means he needs to change his position and  	support gay marriage.  <em>Wow.  Again&#8230;wow.</em></li>
<li>Related to the previous item, a mailing sent out in Maine is attempting  	to persuade residents of the state to vote &#8220;<em>Yes</em>&#8221; in the upcoming ballot item  	to prohibit gay marriage.  The reasons that it proposes? I happen to  	have FiveThirtyEight.com&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/10/arguments-against-gay-marriage.html"> summations of the reasons</a>&#8230;first, the mailing claims that the new law  	permitting gay marriage &#8220;<strong>won&#8217;t make gay marriage equal to straight  	marriage. Instead, it will create a new kind of marriage in which gay people  	and straight people are equal.</strong>&#8220;  Well, besides not making much  	sense&#8230;that&#8217;s certainly not going to &#8220;<em>stir up</em>&#8221; too many people.   	The second reason it offers: &#8220;<strong>&#8230;we may not have proven any connection  	between gay marriage and public education, our opponents haven&#8217;t disproven  	the connection, and it&#8217;s their fault that the subject came up.</strong>&#8220;   	Impressive&#8230;that doesn&#8217;t really say anything, does it.  I mean, it  	sounds like it&#8217;s saying something&#8230;but then it just&#8230;doesn&#8217;t.  And  	third, the mailing offers that, &#8220;<strong>if gay marriage is upheld, then marriage  	will exist solely to make people happy.</strong>&#8220;  Well,  	it&#8217;s hard to see how that&#8217;s true&#8230;would gay people marrying suddenly make  	heterosexual marriages &#8220;<em>meaningless</em>&#8221; and about nothing more than &#8220;<em>happiness</em>?&#8221;   	And hell, I know some people who will tell you that marriage has nothing to  	do with happiness at all&#8230;I&#8217;m sure they were just kidding&#8230;</li>
<li><em>Meet Philip Spooner:</em> Want to hear a86-year-old  	man&#8230;lifelong Republican&#8230;and WWII veteran who fought on D-Day&#8230;defend  	gay marriage with all his heart?  <em>Yeah, me too:</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrEbJBFWIPk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Despite the calls from Republicans that protecting gay Americans was the  	equivalent of protecting practitioners of  <em>pedophilia, bestiality,  	and necrophilia</em>&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/22/hate-crimes-bill-approved_n_330702.html">the  	new Hate Crimes Bill has passed</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The Nation, a well-known progressive magazine, 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28609.html">is publishing</a> a &#8220;<em>companion piece</em>&#8221; to Sarah Palin&#8217;s new book, &#8220;<em>Going Rogue</em>.&#8221;  It&#8217;s  	titled &#8220;<em>Going Rouge</em>&#8221; and features an almost identical cover, to match the  	almost identical title.  Some conservatives have complained that this  	might lead to some people purchasing The Nation&#8217;s book by mistake.   	Perhaps they&#8217;re right&#8230;seeing as both books will likely be placed next to  	each other on a shelve in the &#8220;<em>Humor</em>&#8221; section&#8230;and due to the fact that  	many of the people seeking Palin&#8217;s book might not know how &#8220;<em>rogue</em>&#8221; is  	properly spelled.</li>
</ul>
<p>That about wraps it up for this week in Reality Liberation.  Have a  wonderful weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-hunting-liberals-president-king-and-going-rouge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shrinking GOP &#8211; More Exclusion, More Insensitivity</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-shrinking-gop-more-exclusion-more-insensitivity/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-shrinking-gop-more-exclusion-more-insensitivity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audra Shay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diann Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Blunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Myrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusty DePass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Tancredo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent ABC/Washington Post Poll, only 20% of respondents said they would identify themselves as Republicans. While we have certainly examined this trend before, it seems we must keep revisiting it in hopes that everyone will understand the very simple reason behind the GOP's downward spiral: EXCLUSION.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/19/AR2009101902451.html?hpid=topnews"> ABC/Washington Post Poll</a>&#8230;<strong>only 20%</strong> of respondents said they would  identify themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>While we have certainly examined this trend before, it seems we must keep  revisiting it in hopes that, sooner or later, everyone will understand the very  simple reason behind the GOP&#8217;s downward spiral.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>It&#8217;s simple:</strong></span></p>
<p>- <strong>All since January of this year:</strong> A staffer for Tennessee State  Rep. Diane Black (R-Gallatin) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/16/tennessee-gop-staffer-ema_n_216085.html"> sends out a racially insensitive email</a>&#8230;she doesn&#8217;t apologize, and isn&#8217;t  terminated.    Representative Roy Blunt (R-MO) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/roy-blunt-r-mo-tells-raci_b_292260.html"> tells a monkey joke</a> at a the <em>2009 Values Voters Summit</em>&#8230;and then  makes it clear that he&#8217;s talking about President Obama.  Kansas Republican  legislator Bill Otto <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a clip on YouTube</a> called &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he criticizes the  President and then refers to opossum as the &#8220;<strong>other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;   Diann Jones, a Texas GOP official, <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/local/stories/060309dnmetgopemail.4568316.html"> criticized a tax</a> on guns as &#8220;<span><strong>Another terrific  idea from the black house and its minions.</strong>&#8220;  Audra Shay, at the time  running to be head of the Young Republicans, encouraged and laughed along with <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-10/the-gops-young-hatemonger/"> racist jokes on her Facebook page</a> and made her own joke about Obama &#8220;<strong>in a  noose</strong>&#8220;&#8230;even after these comments went public, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">she won the position</span>.   GOP activist Rusty DePass <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/16/michelle-obama-gorilla-co_n_216178.html"> responds to a news story</a> about an escaped gorilla&#8230;joking that it is &#8220;</span><strong>just  one of Michelle&#8217;s ancestors &#8211; probably harmless,</strong>&#8220; and the Republican  Party does not apologize.  The chairman of the RNC, Michael Steele, says  that he is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bil-browning/steele-gop-woos-blacks-wi_b_231534.html"> going to lure African-Americans to the Republican Party</a> with &#8220;<strong>fried  chicken.</strong>&#8221;  When asked why he is the only senior official from Louisiana <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/david-vitter-ducks-questi_n_328478.html"> not to rebuke a judge</a> for refusing to marry an interracial couple, Senator  David Vitter (R-LA) would only respond, &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the case</strong>,&#8221;  then got on an elevator, declining to make further comment.  Don&#8217;t wonder very long why many  of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>40.9 million</strong></span> black people in the United States are not  identifying themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>- <strong>All since January of this year:</strong> Senator Kyl (R-AZ) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/arizona-mothers-storm-kyl_b_313458.html"> says that maternity shouldn&#8217;t be covered</a> by health insurance, because he and  other men &#8220;<em>don&#8217;t need it.</em>&#8220;  Senator Al Franken (D-MN) sponsors his  first bill, which states that government contractors that attempt to force female employees not  to report harassment and rape, should be penalized&#8230;and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/meet-the-senators-who-vot_n_312976.html"> 30 Republican senators</a> vote <strong>AGAINST</strong> it.  Republican Robert F.  McDonnell, the man running to become the governor of Virginia&#8230;wrote a thesis  claiming that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/31/AR2009083103855.html"> women should not work</a>, and should stay in the home, and that government  credits for child care expenses are part of the &#8220;<em>problem</em>.&#8221;  The  National Republican Congressional Committee said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi  (D-CA) should be &#8220;<strong>put in her place</strong>&#8220;&#8230;and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/female-republicans-fail-t_n_314265.html"> not a single female Republican legislator</a> (<em>or male Republican  legislator, for that matter</em>) was willing to denounce the statement.  No  fewer than three high ranking Republican &#8220;<em>leaders</em>&#8221; are discovered to be  cheating on their wives, brazenly, and are all connected to the bizarre, &#8220;<em>weirdly-Christian</em>,&#8221; <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/jeff-sharlet-reveals-dist_n_241857.html"> C Street house</a>, where it appears infidelity was not only encouraged (<em>using  the justification that as &#8216;men of power,&#8217; they <strong>DESERVED</strong> to do it</em>), but  it was also allowed to occur in the building and was covered up by other members.   Don&#8217;t wonder very long why many of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>150.6 million</strong></span> women in the  United States are not identifying themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>- <strong>All since January of this year:</strong> Former Republican House  Speaker Newt Gingrich <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/03/gingrich-takes-back-sotom_n_210713.html"> called Justice Sonia Sotomayor a racist</a> during the confirmation  hearings&#8230;and another Republican made the &#8220;<em>Ricky Ricardo</em>&#8221; reference that  she&#8217;d have &#8220;<strong>some &#8216;splainin&#8217; to do.</strong>&#8220;  Former GOP congressman Tom  Tancredo <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/29/gop-hispanic-strategists_n_209240.html"> called Sotomayor</a> a member of the &#8220;<strong>Latino KKK</strong>.&#8221;  The RNC <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/09/29/rncs-spanish-translation-of-hispanic-heritage-month-press-release-riddled-with-errors/"> put out a press release</a> for Hispanic Heritage Month that had obviously just  been run through a translator program and was rife with translation,  grammatical, and spelling errors&#8230;and the ad they put out featuring prominent  Hispanics, didn&#8217;t include Justice Sotomayor.  Two RNC officials defended Senator  Jim DeMint&#8217;s failure to &#8220;<em>bring home</em>&#8221; funds to South Carolina&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/gopers-demint-like-a-jew_n_326295.html">by  saying he was just acting</a> like &#8220;<strong>a jew</strong>&#8221; with our country&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>pennies</strong>.&#8221;   Representative Sue Myrick (R-N.C.) <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/63571-rep-myrick-reiterates-call-to-cut-ties-with-cair"> wrote the forward for a new book</a> which claims there is a &#8220;<em>Muslim  conspiracy</em>&#8221; to take over our government, and Myrick and other Republicans  held a press conference to ask the Sergeant Of Arms of the Congress to  investigate any Muslim interns.  <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/08/tea-party-express-roars-to-dc-tour-anticipates-500/"> Republican Representatives and Senators</a> cheered on a Tea Party gathering in  Washington, D.C&#8230;despite the fact that many protesters held sign bearing  anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim, and anti-foreigner slogans and images.  RNC Chair Michael Steele claimed,  ridiculously, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/16/michael-steele-gay-marria_n_204263.html"> that gay marriage would hurt small businesses</a>.  Representative Steve  King (R-IA) said gay marriage <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/24/steve-king-gay-marriage-i_n_298372.html"> is socialism</a>&#8230;and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/06/democrats-accused-of-usin_n_198167.html"> later claimed</a> that the Hate Crimes legislation to protect homosexuals would  protect other, what he called, &#8220;<em>perversions</em>&#8220;&#8230;and then he compared  homosexuality to bestiality, necrophilia, and pedophilia.  Senator Tom  Coburn (R-OK) is now <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/tom-coburn-attempts-to-ge_n_327712.html"> trying to get gays to support him</a> in the fight against health care  reform&#8230;despite the fact that he has called the &#8220;<strong>gay agenda</strong>&#8221; the &#8220;<strong>greatest  threat to our freedom that we face today,</strong>&#8221; and also once said, &#8220;<strong>Lesbianism  is so rampant in some of the schools in southeast Oklahoma that they&#8217;ll only let  one girl go to the bathroom. Now think about it. Think about that issue. How is  it that that&#8217;s happened to us?</strong>&#8220;  Don&#8217;t wonder  very long why many of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>44.3 million</strong></span> Hispanics&#8230;and the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong> 5.5 million</strong></span> Jews&#8230;and the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>8.8 million</strong></span> gay/bisexual/transgendered people&#8230;and the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>6.5 million</strong></span> Muslims in  the United States are not identifying themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>And these incidents&#8230;are just the <strong>SOME</strong> of the <strong>RECENT</strong> ones  involving politicians and other political officials.  I&#8217;m not even  including the race-baiting and fearmongering from the presidential campaign, nor  any of the numerous incidents involving the right-wing media.</p>
<p>In the end&#8230;<em>it&#8217;s simple mathematics</em>.  Each of us was taught in  grade school that America is a &#8220;<strong>melting pot.</strong>&#8220;  The problem is&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">it&#8217;s  not stirred very well</span>.  There are clumps: enclaves of single-race,  single-religion, single-creed people all across this country.  Within those  caches of homogeneity, people often fall into the simple trap of forgetting  that, while within their clique all may share very similar profiles and  opinions&#8230;<em><strong>the rest of the nation varies considerably</strong></em>.  For  example, when you have lived most of your life in a small town or suburb where  everyone is white, goes to the same evangelical church, votes Republican,  watches FOX News, and opposes homosexuality&#8230;it may be hard to imagine that  there are a <strong>VAST</strong> number of American who are not white, go to some other  church (<em>or don&#8217;t attend at all</em>), vote Democrat (<em>or Independent, or not  at all</em>), think only fools watch FOX News, and support (<em>or simply show  tolerance towards</em>) gays.</p>
<p>Those people also live in America, and millions of others representing every possible  race, ethnicity, sexuality, creed, and lifestyle&#8230;and they are full citizens  with full lives, equal rights, and one vote apiece.  And forgetting that  they vote, not just in the polling place but with their wallets, will lead to  the continued withering of the Republican Party.  It&#8217;s <em>simple</em> math&#8230;and <em>simple</em> politics&#8230;and there&#8217;s no excuse for the GOP not  knowing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-shrinking-gop-more-exclusion-more-insensitivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

