<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Voodoo Economics Revisited &#8211; Republicans and the Tax Cut Fallacy</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/voodoo-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/voodoo-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H. W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Side Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voodoo Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The same group that spent the United States into deficit oblivion, and who ballooned our deficit with tax cuts which most certainly did not pay for themselves...now offer a new solution:  All expenses, like extending unemployment benefits, must be offset by spending cuts elsewhere in the budget...and there should be MORE tax cuts...which they swear will pay for themselves.  These people are called Republicans, and if you believe them, they'd also really like to have majority control of Congress again. They promise they won't spend as much as they did before, and that they'll cut taxes even MORE.  What's wrong with this picture?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think you know nothing about economics? Chances are you know more than you  think&#8230;perhaps even more than the politicians currently sitting in the U.S.Congress.</p>
<p><strong>YOU</strong> know that there are essentially two sides to the &#8220;<em>balance sheet.</em>&#8221; On one  side is your &#8220;<strong><em>Assets/Revenue/Income</em></strong>&#8220;&#8230;the money that is coming in. On the other  side is your &#8220;<strong><em>Liabilities/Debits/Expenses</em></strong>&#8220;&#8230;the money that is going out.</p>
<p><strong>YOU</strong> know that these two sides, in conjunction, determine your bottom  line&#8230;which is to say, whether or not you are making money (<em>in budgeting, we  call this a &#8220;<strong>surplus</strong>&#8220;</em>) or losing money (<em>in budget terms, a &#8220;<strong>deficit</strong>&#8220;</em>).</p>
<p>Republicans are currently trying to tell us (examples <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/12/jon-kyl-extend-bush-tax-c_n_642862.html"> here</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/18/mike-pence-explains-why-a_n_650374.html"> here</a>, and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/18/pete-sessions-nrcc-chair_n_650431.html"> here</a> from Huffington Post) that spending money, like extending  unemployment benefits, increases the deficit and is, therefore, <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BAD</strong></span>. They say  all measures to spend money <strong>MUST</strong> be offset by reduced spending in other areas.</p>
<p>In principle, this is <strong>TRUE</strong>. <em>Yes</em> -- adding expenses without either increasing  revenue or decreasing expenditures somewhere else&#8230;would increase the deficit.  File that little equation under &#8220;<em>D</em>&#8221; for &#8220;<em>Duh</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>They also tell us that reducing revenue, for example the Bush tax cuts for the  wealthy, does not increase the deficit and is, therefore, <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GOOD</strong></span>. They say these  tax cuts do not require that either more taxes be collected somewhere else, or  that spending be decreased to offset their effect.</p>
<p>That much, is <strong>FALSE</strong>&#8230;and is, perhaps, the most irresponsible rationale we&#8217;ve  heard used to justify what amounts to little more than partisan political hackery. Your average person with no financial education whatsoever can see that  decreasing the amount of tax revenue without increasing revenue somewhere else  or decreasing expenses <strong>WOULD</strong> increase the deficit.</p>
<p>See the attached graph&#8230;and you&#8217;ll see that tax cuts, in fact, have a bigger  impact on increasing the deficit than two foreign wars, stimulative spending,  and entitlement programs:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="CBPP - Deficit Breakdown" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/CBPPchart.jpg" alt="" width="301" height="366" /></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&amp;id=3036">Center on  Budget and Policy Priorities</a></p>
<p>This particular deception&#8230;is nothing new.  Once upon a time, in our  not-so-distant past, a man named George Herbert Walker Bush (a Republican) ran against another  man named Ronald Reagan (also a Republican) for President of the United States.  Reagan  espoused an idea that has come to be known as &#8220;<em>Supply Side Economics</em>.&#8221;  Essentially, this theory holds that reducing taxes on the private sector will  lead to significant economic growth&#8230;enough growth to offset the loss of tax revenue.   Bush, in challenging Reagan&#8217;s proposal, would famously call this &#8220;<strong><em>voodoo economics.</em></strong>&#8220;  Watch part of the debate  between the two men:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/edchtf9MS7g&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/edchtf9MS7g&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edchtf9MS7g">www.youtube.com/watch?v=edchtf9MS7g</a></p></p>
<p>Reagan would later go on to win the election, and today he is viewed by many in the  Republican Party to be a &#8220;<em>true conservative hero,</em>&#8220; a sort  of epitome of what Republicans are &#8220;supposed to be.&#8221; But the truth is that  his presidency, in many ways, represented an <strong>END</strong> to responsible, fiscal  conservatism, and it was during his presidency that America&#8217;s federal deficit,  and our national debt, <strong>SKYROCKETED</strong>.</p>
<p>In fact, if we look at the increase in the national debt while the last two  Democrats were in office, Carter and Clinton, we saw increases of 42% and 36%,  respectively.</p>
<p>While Reagan, following &#8220;<em>tax cut ideology</em>,&#8221; was President&#8230;the  National Debt <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>increased by 182%</strong></span>.</p>
<p>George H. W. Bush, who initially lambasted &#8220;<em>tax cut ideology</em>,&#8221; only to  later adopt it himself&#8230;.saw an increase of <strong>55%.</strong></p>
<p>George W. Bush, also added <strong>MORE</strong> tax cuts&#8230;and saw an increase of <strong>89%</strong>.</p>
<p><em>Wait a minute</em>.  Here are the Republicans, claiming <strong>STILL</strong> to be the party  of &#8220;<em>fiscal responsibility and conservatism</em>,&#8221; and they are spending us into  <strong>MORE</strong> debt than the Democrats, and are continuing to reduce our tax revenue through  tax cuts, creating a <strong>LARGER</strong> deficit than under Democrats.  How exactly is  this methodology either &#8220;<em>responsible</em>&#8221; <strong>OR</strong> &#8220;<em>conservative</em>?&#8221;</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s worse, they continue to spout the <strong>SAME</strong> lie as before.  Just  this month, Mike Pence (R-Ind.) said, &#8220;<strong>The reality is that as you study &#8212; when President  Kennedy cut marginal tax rates, when Ronald Reagan cut marginal tax rates, when President Bush  imposed those tax cuts, they actually generated economic growth, they expand the economy, they  expand tax revenue.</strong>&#8220;  Senator Kyl (R-Az.) has echoed this idea, as  have Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and many others in the GOP.  Unfortunately for  Pence, and for all of us, what he says is clearly <strong>NOT</strong> reality.   George W. <a href="http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy04/pdf/2003_erp.pdf"> Bush&#8217;s economic policy group</a> told him tax cuts would not generate enough  growth to make up for the lost revenue. Bush&#8217;s Chief Economist was even more  direct about this when he said, &#8220;<strong>You are smart people. You know that the tax  cuts have not fueled record revenues. You know what it takes to establish  causality. You know that the first order effect of cutting taxes is to lower tax  revenues. We all agree that the ultimate reduction in tax revenues can be less  than this first order effect, because lower tax rates encourage greater economic  activity and thus expand the tax base. No thoughtful person believes that this  possible offset more than compensated for the first effect for these tax cuts.  Not a single one.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>And yet so many Americans, seduced by the idea of tax cuts and ignoring their  own common sense, still accept and repeat the GOP&#8217;s fiscal mantra: &#8220;<em>Tax cuts  pay for themselves.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>I love a good ideological debate, and there are a great many that we can  have&#8230;but is it necessary for us to debate an issue where one side&#8217;s position  is <em>completely, demonstrably false</em>?  Must we continue to listen to  the same people who ballooned our debt and our deficit, by cutting tax revenues  while spending as if the money were on fire&#8230;tell us that they deserve to be  elected back into office because <em>they</em> have the solution to the problem: <strong><em>More tax cuts and responsible spending&#8230;the latter of which they proven  incapable of doing</em></strong>?  For how long, in the face of overwhelming  evidence to the contrary and amidst the screaming of expert economists, must  Americans still see the GOP as the party of &#8220;<em>foreign policy and fiscal  responsibility?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>An Analogy</strong>:  You are very sick.  You go to a doctor who says  he has a revolutionary, &#8220;<em>proven</em>&#8221; cure (<em>although he can&#8217;t produce any  proof of it actually working</em>) called &#8220;<em>slap therapy.</em>&#8220;  He slaps  you&#8230;nothing happens, you&#8217;re still sick.  He says, &#8220;<em>Well, you have to  do it more than once</em>,&#8221; and slaps you again&#8230;but you&#8217;re still sick.   You decide to try another doctor who has an actual, proven, documented therapy  which has helped millions of people&#8230;but it will take months of treatment, and  the treatment is uncomfortable.  You try it, but after a few weeks you are  tired of the discomfort and waiting so you go back to the first doctor.  He  says he has the answer to your problems: &#8220;<em>slap therapy</em>.&#8221;  And the  slapping begins anew&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>America&#8230;aren&#8217;t you tired of getting slapped?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/voodoo-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics In The American South &#8211; The 800 Pound Gorilla In The Room</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/politics-in-the-american-south-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/politics-in-the-american-south-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violent Rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Demographics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I were to tell you that I'm talking about a region of the United States...with the most poverty...the least education...the most intolerance...the most zealous religious beliefs...would you know exactly which region I was talking about?  If this region, and this voter demographic, were attempting to dominate the political dialogue...wouldn't you think there was a problem?  There is...and it's time everyone got a bit more honest in talking about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m continually amazed by one particular area of our national, political  dialogue, where it seems even angels fear to tread.  If you watch any of  the major news networks (<em>especially during the last presidential election</em>), you  probably saw this map:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="2008 Election Results" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/Election.png" alt="2008 Election Results" width="349" height="203" /></p>
<p>This is, of course, a map of the election results showing the states that  voted for Senator John McCain in <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>red</strong></span>.</p>
<p>I saw some networks, in their near obsession with voter demographics, show  this map:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="2008 Election - White Voters For Obama" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/WhiteVoters.gif" alt="2008 Election - White Voters For Obama" width="300" height="350" /></p>
<p>This map shows which states had the <strong><em>lowest</em></strong> percentage of white voters voting  for Barack Obama.  The states where the fewest white people voted for Obama  are in dark <strong><span style="color: #cc0000;">red</span></strong> and <strong> <span style="color: #800080;">purple</span></strong>.</p>
<p>Now stay with me&#8230;here is an interesting map, also shown during the  election&#8217;s demographic analysis, highlighting the states with the highest number  of voters who identify themselves as members of <em>evangelical, Protestant</em> religions:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="United States - Evangelicals" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/Evangelicals.png" alt="United States - Evangelicals" width="349" height="303" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="United States - Evangelicals Key" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/EvangelicalsKey.png" alt="United States - Evangelicals Key" width="450" height="53" /></p>
<p>The darker the shade of <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">blue</span></strong>&#8230;the more evangelical Christians.</p>
<p>Of course, analysts also covered the educational aspects of America&#8217;s voters.   Here&#8217;s a map showing which states have the <strong><em>fewest</em></strong> high school graduates:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="United States - HS Grads" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/HighSchool.gif" alt="United States - HS Grads" width="349" height="253" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="United States - HS Grads Key" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/HighSchoolKey.gif" alt="United States - HS Grads Key" width="100" height="200" /></p>
<p>The lighter the shade of <strong><span style="color: #66ff33;">green</span></strong>&#8230;the fewer people graduated from high school  in that region.</p>
<p>Another subject for analysis, was the income/poverty level of voters.   Here&#8217;s a map showing areas with the <em>highest</em> poverty levels:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="United States - Poverty" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/Poverty.gif" alt="United States - Poverty" width="349" height="253" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="United States - Poverty Key" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/PovertyKey.gif" alt="United States - Poverty Key" width="100" height="200" /></p>
<p>The darker the <strong><span style="color: #008000;">green</span></strong>&#8230;the more people living in poverty.</p>
<p>You <em>probably</em> know where I am headed with this.  But if that is the  case&#8230;then <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">why</span></em> did I not see a single network, a single media outlet, directly  address this &#8220;<em>800 pound gorilla</em>&#8221; which is dramatically affecting our nation&#8217;s  political conversation?  I saw experts on NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, MSNBC, and  CNN display these maps&#8230;then scratch their chins and shrug, saying things like,  &#8220;<em>I&#8217;m not sure what this tells us.</em>&#8220;  How about this:  I&#8217;ll say it&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>The poorest, most uneducated, most intolerant, most religiously extreme  portion of our country&#8230;limited mostly (<em>but not entirely</em>) to the southern  states&#8230;is the base of the conservative movement, and the Republican Party.</strong></p>
<p>Now&#8230;before we go any further&#8230;here are things that I am <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NOT</strong></span> saying:</p>
<p>- Not <span style="text-decoration: underline;">everyone</span> in the South is racist/intolerant, and yes, there are  <em><strong>lots</strong></em> of  intolerant people in other parts of the country.  The South simply has <strong>MORE</strong> racists and otherwise intolerant people.</p>
<p>- Not <span style="text-decoration: underline;">everyone</span> in the South is poor or uneducated, and yes, there are <strong><em>lots</em></strong> of  poor and uneducated people in other parts of the country.  The South simply  has <strong>MORE</strong> poor and uneducated people.</p>
<p>- Not <span style="text-decoration: underline;">everyone</span> in the South is an evangelical Protestant, and there are  evangelicals in other parts of the country.  The South simply has <strong>MORE</strong> evangelical Protestants.</p>
<p>- Not <span style="text-decoration: underline;">everyone</span> who is an evangelical is poor and/or uneducated.   Not everyone who is uneducated is poor and/or evangelical.  Not everyone  who is poor is uneducated and/or evangelical.  <strong>Some people are one, two,  or all three of these things.</strong></p>
<p>This population is more likely to be on unemployment, public assistance (<em>re:  welfare, food stamps</em>), or some other public program&#8230;and they are also more  likely to be <strong>AGAINST</strong> these same types of social programs, which they are  told to view  as &#8220;<em>big government</em>,&#8221; or &#8220;<em>socialism</em>,&#8221; or, &#8220;<em>handouts for lazy people.</em>&#8220;  They  are also more likely reject evolutionary theory, climate change theory,  health-related studies&#8230;and many other scientific ideas.  They are more  likely to believe that President Obama&#8217;s birth certificate is a fraudulent  document&#8230;and that he was instead born in Kenya.   They are more likely to believe that the newly-passed Health Care legislation is  going to &#8220;<em>kill grandma</em>,&#8221; or &#8220;<em>pay for abortions</em>,&#8221; or &#8220;<em>provide insurance to  illegal aliens.</em>&#8220;  They are more likely to want prayer in schools, the Ten  Commandments in courthouses, and to vote against political candidates for not  being &#8220;<em>Christian-enough</em>.&#8221;  They are more likely to be opposed to any  measures granting equal rights to gay and lesbian citizens, and to oppose any  laws to protect these citizens.  And they are <strong>MUCH</strong> more likely&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>to vote  Republican.</strong></span></p>
<p>Does this have an effect on our country?  <em><strong>Of course it does&#8230;</strong></em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Case in point:</strong></span> I live in a southern state.  Here are some  interesting examples of what has occurred in the last twenty years due (<em>in  part</em>) to public  officials being chosen by a largely poor, uneducated, and highly religious  population:</p>
<p>- Our state&#8217;s educational performance?  35th to 48th out of 50 states  (depending on the source of the study).  Our schools have frightening  numbers of &#8220;<em>portable classrooms</em>,&#8221; crumbling facilities, high teen  pregnancy rates, and many teachers forced to teach outside of their licensure  area.  We also have deceptive graduation rates&#8230;because failing students  are still promoted to the next grade and nearly <strong>EVERYONE</strong> is given a  diploma.  Proposals for  a three cent tax increase to improve the system, buy new materials, fix  buildings, or increase teacher pay&#8230;<em>rejected by the public</em>.   Proposal for a <span style="text-decoration: underline;">one cent</span> tax increase&#8230;<em>ALSO REJECTED</em>.</p>
<p>- In 1999, just after the city&#8217;s mayor publicly questioned why so many people deride  the South, the state legislature passed a bill&#8230;allowing people to legally  collect road kill off the street, take it home, <em>and eat it</em>.</p>
<p>- Members of our state&#8217;s GOP, Republican elected officials, and Republican  staffers&#8230;account for at least three of the nationally publicized, racism  scandals stemming from &#8220;<em>jokes</em>&#8221; directed at our current president. In fact, it  was a former Republican Party chair from our state who brought you the &#8220;<em>Barack  the Magic Negro</em>&#8221; song.</p>
<p>- It was a mayor in our state who went on Facebook and accused Obama of being  a Muslim&#8230;because a televised presidential speech <em>pre-empted a Charlie Brown  holiday special</em>.</p>
<p>- Our state&#8217;s GOP released statements attacking the President over his middle  name, and accused him of being an anti-Semite&#8230;which even prompted condemnation from  the national RNC.</p>
<p>- Our state&#8217;s Republicans said this year&#8230;that $2.13 an hour for &#8220;<em>tipped  workers</em>&#8221; like restaurant servers, is <strong>MORE</strong> than adequate, and objected to the  wage being raised to $3.28 an hour.</p>
<p>-  The metro council in our state&#8217;s capitol proposed an &#8220;<em>English-only</em>&#8221;  bill&#8230;that said that all government services and notices would only be  conducted/written in English, with no translation services offered.  They  also included a proposal that would allow private business to dictate that only  English could be spoken in their workplace.  This is the <strong>THIRD TIME</strong> in recent years that such a measure has been proposed.  This same council  recently debated (<em>at length</em>) as to whether or not to switch from pitchers  of water to bottled water at their meetings&#8230;out of fear that &#8220;<em>terrorists</em>&#8221;  would try to poison them.</p>
<p>-  The state legislature recently <strong>PASSED</strong> a bill, allowing people  <em>to start  carrying guns in bars</em>&#8230;as long as they promise not to drink while packing heat.</p>
<p>-  In late 2009, one state legislator proposed a bill&#8230;that would allow  our state to disregard or &#8220;<em>nullify</em>&#8221; any federal laws they hold to be  unconstitutional.</p>
<p>- In the <em>Firearms Freedom Act</em>, our state legislator proposed that federal gun  laws <em>don&#8217;t apply to guns made in our state</em>.</p>
<p>- When the state was engaged in a heated debate over whether or not to enact  an income tax&#8230;most of the anti-tax protesters circling the capitol, either  didn&#8217;t have jobs (<em>therefore, no income</em>) or made so little that an income tax  would not apply to them.  Many of the districts which most strongly opposed  the bill, were low-income districts that would have <em>benefitted from an income  tax and decreased taxes on sales and food</em>.  By the way, despite a <span style="text-decoration: underline;">soaring</span> state sales  tax&#8230;the income tax measure was defeated, and this year the legislature took  steps towards making a state income tax <span style="text-decoration: underline;">unconstitutional</span>.</p>
<p>- During our current, tough economic times&#8230;the state Senate found time to  pass a bill banning the late night, &#8220;<em>Girls Gone Wild</em>&#8221;  advertisements, almost certainly on the grounds that <em>Jesus</em> doesn&#8217;t want  you to see them.  Similarly, our state still has &#8220;<em>blue laws</em>&#8221;  detailing certain times when alcoholic products may not be purchased. You can  guess on which day of the week sales are prohibited&#8230;</p>
<p>- The legislature also found time for an important debate&#8230;on whether or not  an old law should be overturned, so that fish tanks could be allowed in  barbershops. <em>It passed</em>.</p>
<p>-  A resolution was proposed to reject federal stimulus money, and which  proclaimed that the state legislature should &#8220;<em><strong>strongly urge the federal government to reject  attempts to establish socialism as a form of government in America.</strong></em>&#8221;</p>
<p>- I couldn&#8217;t make something like this up:  A bill has been proposed this  year&#8230;to  prevent the federal government from putting a chip in our heads.  Its  sponsor told a local reporter, &#8220;<em><strong>In the Christian religion, and I&#8217;m a Christian,  in the book of Revelation, there was a reference to, you know, the Mark of the  Beast. Some people interpret that to be one of these microchips.</strong></em>&#8220;   No one is entirely certain what she is referring to when she says &#8220;<em>these  microchips</em>&#8221; (<em>said as if there is <strong>actually</strong> a plan to install  microchips in people</em>), but oh well&#8230;she probably saw it in a movie and just  got scared.</p>
<p>- Our governor recently signed into law the &#8220;<em>Religious Freedom Restoration  Act,</em>&#8221; which makes it easier for a person or group to claim that their religious  freedoms have been violated by the government.</p>
<p>- One of our Representatives to the United States House recently told reports that  the dialogue in Washington should definitely be more &#8220;<em><strong>civil</strong></em>&#8220;&#8230;but wouldn&#8217;t commit  personally to stop calling the president a &#8220;<em><strong>socialist</strong></em>&#8221; or a &#8220;<strong><em>tyrant</em></strong>.&#8221;   This same Representative, when research studies suggested that women should get  mammograms performed less often, said &#8220;<em><strong>this is how rationing begins.</strong></em>&#8220;   Ironically, she did not support requiring insurance companies to <strong>COVER</strong> mammograms.</p>
<p>- Another Representative (<em>who is also a gubernatorial hopeful</em>) recently  stated that health care is a &#8220;<strong><em>privilege</em></strong>&#8221; and not a &#8220;<strong><em>right</em></strong>,&#8221; and that the  health care  bill represented &#8220;<strong><em>socialism</em></strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong><em>class warfare.</em></strong>&#8221;  Our Senator said that the use of reconciliation to pass Health Care would be &#8220;<em><strong>the  end of the Senate.</strong></em>&#8221;</p>
<p>These are the kinds of people elected by an uneducated, religiously extreme  constituency&#8230;and these are the kinds of laws those elected officials focus on  to satisfy such a constituency.  A constituency who is willing to be told  something or someone in &#8220;<em>Un-Christian</em>&#8220;&#8230;even though the Bible holds no  such scripture, or at times even contradicts the claim.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to be told something is or isn&#8217;t in the Constitution&#8230;even though  cursory examination of the document would quickly prove the position false.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe that &#8220;<em>end-of-life counseling</em>&#8221; is the equivalent  of a &#8220;<em>death panel.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe that, if gay people are allowed to marry, that people  will also have to be allowed to marry children and animals&#8230;when even a  high-school-level of legal knowledge would prove this false.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe that &#8220;<em>their tax dollars</em>&#8221; are going to be given  to &#8220;<em>someone else</em>&#8220;&#8230;even when it&#8217;s not their tax dollars, and <strong>THEY</strong> will be the recipient of the benefits.</p>
<p>&#8230;easily led to believe that their tax burden should stay the same, and that  decreasing the tax burden of the wealthiest 2% of the country will help <strong>THEM</strong>.</p>
<p>&#8230;easily led to believe that certain people or laws are &#8220;<em>socialist</em>,&#8221;  or &#8220;<em>fascist</em>,&#8221; or &#8220;<em>tyrannical</em>,&#8221; or &#8220;<em>totalitarian</em>&#8220;&#8230;even  though they have no knowledge of what these terms mean.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe that one government-run or government-subsidized  program equates to &#8220;<em>conversion to socialism</em>&#8221; and the &#8220;<em>death of the  free market system</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe that &#8220;<em>regulating business</em>&#8221; will cause companies  to no longer be able to &#8220;<em>do business</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to dismiss scientific claims that they don&#8217;t understand&#8230;such as  believing that one blizzard invalidates Climate Change theory.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe it when their churches told them President Clinton was  the &#8220;<em>Antichrist</em>&#8220;&#8230;and are twice as willing to believe it when their  church now tells them it is President Obama.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to give up their freedoms under one president in the name of &#8220;<em>security</em>&#8220;&#8230;and  then willing to be outraged over imaginary threats that another president will  take their freedoms away.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to be told what the founding fathers of this nation thought, or  believed, or intended&#8230;lacking the sufficient historical knowledge to know  which claims are demonstrably false.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to accept that one president&#8217;s unprecedented expansion of  government and the power of the Executive Branch was &#8220;<em>necessary</em>&#8220;&#8230;and  that the use of those same powers by the next president constitutes a &#8220;<em>dictatorship</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to accept that the use of parliamentary procedures by one  congressional faction is &#8220;<em>necessary</em>&#8220;&#8230;the use of those same procedures  by the opposing faction is a &#8220;<em>subversion of our democracy</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe that waterboarding is not torture&#8230;as long as our  government promises to <em>only use it against terror suspects</em>.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe one year that a &#8220;<em>patriot</em>&#8221; supports everything  his or her government does&#8230;and that the next year a &#8220;<em>patriot</em>&#8221; rejects  everything his or her government does.</p>
<p>&#8230;willing to believe that everyone believes the same things that they, and  the people in their community, believe.  Or that everyone <strong>SHOULD</strong>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and lastly, willing to believe that smart, educated people should not be  listened to.  That these &#8220;<em>elites</em>&#8221; consider themselves to be &#8220;<em>better</em>&#8221;  than the uneducated&#8230;and that these educated people &#8220;<em>don&#8217;t know anything  about the real world.</em>&#8220;  They are told that those people with college  degrees may know about &#8220;<em>poetry</em>&#8221; and other &#8220;<em>esoteric subjects</em>&#8220;&#8230;but  don&#8217;t have any &#8220;<em>common sense.</em>&#8220;  That those people who have traveled  the nation and the world have been somehow &#8220;<em>tainted</em>&#8221; by their exposure to  other people, culture, and beliefs&#8230;and have come to &#8220;<em>hate America.</em>&#8220;   Well, as I know that conservatives are not fond of political correctness, allow  me for one moment to <strong>cut right to the point</strong>:</p>
<p>Educated, knowledgeable people&#8230;may not be better people&#8230;may not be more  principled people.  However, at the risk of damaging the fragile egos and  self-delusions of the uneducated, <strong>the educated do have clear advantages</strong>.   Education builds knowledge&#8230;in vital areas such as reading comprehension (<em>you  know, so you actually <strong>UNDERSTAND</strong> what you read</em>), history and civics (<em>so  you actually understand what America is about, and how its government is  supposed to function</em>), science (<em>so you can better evaluate scientific  claims and theories</em>), math and business (i<em>n order to better comprehend  matters of taxation, budgets, spending, and trade</em>).  Those who go on to  college further develop their research and reasoning skills, which aid them in  better accumulating information and in knowing how to analyze, and synthesize  that information into your own beliefs and theories&#8230;<strong>and to reevaluate and  modify those theories as new information is attained</strong>.  Those college  and university attendees often focus on developing deeper knowledge of business,  or law, or civics, or culture, or science.  While the uneducated base their  ideas on &#8220;<em>common sense</em>&#8221; which is often wrong, &#8220;<em>conventional wisdom</em>&#8221;  which is tied more to &#8220;<em>popular ideas</em>&#8221; than to facts, and to political and  church dogma or propaganda&#8230;the educated, if choosing to <strong>USE</strong> their  education, are gathering information, applying reason to the data, and forming  sound conclusions based on a wealth of experiences and information spanning  several subject areas.</p>
<p>So why am I focusing so much attention on the South?  Because it has  come to the time when we <strong>MUST</strong> do so.  It is time we acknowledged  that we have an &#8220;<em>at risk</em>&#8221; region of our country.  An &#8220;<em>at risk</em>&#8221;  region that must be dragged forcibly into the light&#8230;made to see that racism  has no place in America, that education should be every person&#8217;s priority (<em>particularly,  every <strong>PARENT&#8217;S</strong> priority</em>), that Southerners do not represent the &#8220;<em>majority</em>&#8221;  or the &#8220;<em>mainstream.</em>&#8220;  <strong>The captain and passengers of our great &#8220;<em>ship  of state</em>&#8221; are looking to the horizon, wondering why we are drawing no closer  to fuller equality, fuller happiness, fuller opportunity for all our citizens.   If they would just look down, they&#8217;d see that someone neglected to raise the  anchor&#8230;the southern states&#8230;and they now drag upon the ocean floor.</strong> This message is even more critical, given the current tone conservative leaders  are using when addressing this particular flock.  In just the last week, I  have heard this group addressed with terms like &#8220;<em>killing</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>destroying</em>,&#8221;  &#8220;<em>reloading</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>revolution</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>demons</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>tyrants</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>hanging</em>,&#8221;  and &#8220;<em>crosshairs</em>.&#8221;  This demographic has responded by spitting on  members of Congress, shouting racial and homophobic slurs at members of  Congress, hanging elected officials in effigy, throwing bricks, and firing guns.   The conservatives tell us that they aren&#8217;t encouraging violence, and then in the  same breath they defend it by saying that these people are &#8220;<em>angry</em>.&#8221;  <strong>The conservatives tell us that they are simply using violent &#8220;<em>metaphors</em>,&#8221;  without realizing the inherent threat: Their intended audience&#8230;does not know  what a &#8220;<em>metaphor</em>&#8221; is.</strong></p>
<p>In closing, believe it or not: <em>I love the South</em>.  I love that  people here are more conversational&#8230;I just wish there were more topics that  could be intelligently discussed.  I love that people here are more willing  to voice their opinions&#8230;I just wish fewer of those opinions were based on  their parents&#8217; prejudices, their church leaders&#8217; demagoguery, their political  leaders&#8217; propaganda, and their favorite media personalities&#8217; disinformation.   And most of all, I love their big hearts, and their willingness to help out  total strangers&#8230;I just wish they&#8217;d still be so willing to help those people if  they knew their ethnicity, their beliefs, their sexuality, their politics.</p>
<p><em>But</em>, I still love the South&#8230;and hope to see the day when its  residents can truly love and accept all the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/politics-in-the-american-south-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Politicizes All, Including Tragedy&#8230;And Other Topics</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-politicizes-all-including-tragedy-and-other-topics/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-politicizes-all-including-tragedy-and-other-topics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Hood Tragedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox and Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome Corsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back!  The RLF has been on hiatus this week, attending to other matters.  So, we thought we'd take some time today to focus on links related to three general categories of recent events and revelations:  The Health Care Carnival Of Despair, The Politicization of Everything, The Recent Elections.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back!  The RLF has been on hiatus this week, attending to other  matters.  So, we thought we&#8217;d take some time today to focus on links  related to three general categories of recent events and revelations:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>First, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and the Republicans <strong> DEMANDED</strong> that the current Democrats&#8217; health care bill be posted online  	for 72 hours prior to the vote.  Boehner quickly, and sheepishly, 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/29/boehner-gop-72-hours/">backed  	down</a> when asked if the GOP would do likewise with their bill.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> <strong>The problem:</strong></span> they had no bill.  They&#8217;d been claiming  	for over six months that they had their own plan&#8230;but had produced nothing.   	Zip.  <em>Bubkus</em>.  Even conservative economists 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/mccain-economist-gop-will_n_342324.html"> start voicing their concerns</a>: without a GOP alternative bill&#8230;they look 	<strong>REALLY</strong> bad, especially going into the 2010 and 2012 elections.   	On CNN, Boehner gets even more defensive&#8230;when cornered, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/01/boehner-on-lack-of-gop-he_n_341404.html"> the best he can offer</a> is that they have &#8220;<strong>eight or nine ideas about  	how to make our current health care system better.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Then&#8230;<em>a miracle</em>:  the GOP 	<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125711811707721639.html">announces</a> it will be releasing its own health care reform bill.  Now, remember  	the stimulus debate?  Remember how the Democrats had a plan and the  	Republicans didn&#8217;t?  Remember how the Republicans then made themselves  	look even <strong>WORSE</strong>, by claiming they had a plan&#8230;and it turned out to  	be just a flimsy political statement with no numbers, no data, no specifics?   	Well&#8230;they surely wouldn&#8217;t make that mistake again&#8230;oh wait, <em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/03/boehners-health-care-bill_n_343792.html"> I guess they did</a></em>.  Their &#8220;<em>triumphant</em>&#8221; alternative to the  	Democrats&#8217; health care bill?  It doesn&#8217;t force insurance companies to  	insure people with pre-existing conditions (<em>something the GOP has claimed  	to support</em>), it wouldn&#8217;t provide insurance to a <strong>SINGLE</strong> one of the 	<strong>FORTY MILLION</strong> uninsured people in this country, and&#8230;wait for  	it&#8230;it costs <strong>MORE</strong> than the Democrats&#8217; plan.  Wow&#8230;less  	benefit&#8230;more cost&#8230;way to show us all that you&#8217;ve really embraced the  	whole &#8220;<em>fiscal conservatism and responsibility</em>&#8221; thing.</li>
<li>Now, if you&#8217;re like me, you might well ask: With the soaring price of  	health care, the number of uninsured, and the number of people dying because  	they are uninsured&#8230;why would the GOP put out a plan that fails to address 	<strong>ANY</strong> of these problems?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The answer:</strong></span> They  	don&#8217;t admit to the problems&#8230;or they simply don&#8217;t care.   	Representative Steve King (R-IA) 	<a href="http://iowaindependent.com/21813/steve-kings-response-to-question-on-uninsured-americans-people-want-freedom"> was asked</a> how many people in his district were uninsured and could only  	mutter, &#8220;<strong>My district&#8230;The people in my district are calling for freedom.</strong>&#8220;   	House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) said that the recent, full  	endorsement of the Democrats&#8217; plan by the AARP and the AMA 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/cantor-scoffs-at-aarp-and_n_347430.html"> doesn&#8217;t mean anything</a> to him or the other Republicans.  <em>That&#8217;s  	right:</em> The largest groups representing seniors and doctors, groups that  	almost always lean heavily conservative and have usually opposed health  	reform in the past&#8230;they back the bill, and it&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: underline;">meaningless</span> to  	Cantor and the GOP.  Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) showed he didn&#8217;t care <strong> AT ALL</strong> when he said earlier this week that he doesn&#8217;t see what the  	problem is&#8230;because &#8220;<strong>everyone can show up at the hospital.</strong>&#8220;   	Jim&#8230;those emergency room visits by the uninsured are one of the number one  	financial drains on the system, and if you were paying <strong>ANY</strong> attention,  	you&#8217;d know that:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qZIr6w1_AVU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qZIr6w1_AVU&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZIr6w1_AVU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZIr6w1_AVU</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE POLITICIZATION OF&#8230;WELL&#8230;EVERYTHING:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Have you noticed?</em> It seems that the GOP/RNC/FOX are willing  	to politicize anything?  Shamelessly&#8230;and in a way that, if the  	Democrats did so, they would certainly be positively <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>livid</strong></span>?   	A few very current examples follow&#8230;</li>
<li>Yesterday, something truly awful happened.  At Fort Hood, Texas, a  	soldier went on a shooting spree. When the dust settled, thirteen people  	lost their lives&#8230;thirty-one people were wounded&#8230;many more would be  	emotionally scarred&#8230;and conservatives, well, they saw the usual  	opportunity to make political hay from the tragedy.  It started with  	cries of &#8220;<em>terrorism</em>,&#8221; even from 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/06/allen-west-gop-candidate_n_348248.html"> some GOP members</a>. Then when they found out the shooter was a soldier, a  	Muslim soldier, their cries changed to &#8220;<em>domestic terrorism!</em>&#8220;  <em> World Net Daily</em>&#8216;s Jerome Corsi, renowned for creating conspiracy  	theories out of thin air with no regard for reality, quickly 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/06/iwndis-jerome-corsi-claim_n_348461.html"> claimed</a> that the shooter, Nidal Malik Hasan, had <strong>ADVISED</strong> Barack  	Obama.  Turns out that Hasan only attended a seminar as an audience  	member, that was held by a task force that advises Obama&#8230;but that&#8217;s close  	enough for Corsi.  <em>Fox &amp; Friends</em> <a href="http://rawstory.com/2009/11/fox-host-suggests-special-screenings/"> explored</a> the idea of whether or not there should be &#8220;<strong>special  	screenings</strong>&#8221; for Muslims that serve in the military, and Gretchen Carlson  	floated the idea that if not for &#8220;<strong>political correctness</strong>&#8221; towards  	Muslims, Hasan might have been stopped.  This should sound  	familiar&#8230;conservatives often use &#8220;<em>anti-political correctness</em>&#8221;  	arguments to justify racial profiling and other discriminatory tactics used  	against &#8220;<em>non-white, non-Christian</em>&#8221; Americans.  Today, I already  	spotted conservative friends parroting this talking point on  	Facebook&#8230;condemning the supposed &#8220;<em>pc mentality</em>&#8221; that they hold  	truly responsible for the killings.  It was Geraldo Rivera that stepped  	in to point out that it was more likely &#8220;<strong>government bureaucracy</strong>&#8221; and  	not &#8220;<strong>political correctness</strong>.&#8221;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Comment:</strong></span> you  	know your talk show is more than a little flaky&#8230;when <strong>GERALDO RIVERA</strong> is serving as the &#8220;<em>voice of reason.</em>&#8220;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Interesting side  	note:</strong></span> the military also appears to have trouble keeping biker  	and street gang members out&#8230;not because of &#8220;<em>pc</em>&#8221; <strong>OR</strong> &#8220;<em>bureaucracy</em>&#8220;&#8230;but  	because they are so desperate for new recruits.</li>
<li>Want to know what happens when you&#8217;re enough of a jackass to politicize  	rape?  Senator David Vitter (R-LA) was one of the GOP senators to vote  	against Senator Al Franken&#8217;s recent bill, that would force government  	contractors to allow their employees to report rape or harassment.   	Here&#8217;s what happened when Vitter runs into a victim of rape:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/r6YZ1wP1978&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/r6YZ1wP1978&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6YZ1wP1978">www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6YZ1wP1978</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>How do you politicize the stimulus package?  Well first&#8230;you call  	it &#8220;<em>socialism</em>&#8221; and say you&#8217;ll refuse to accept it in your state.   	Then, of course, <strong><em>you accept it</em></strong>.  Then you travel amongst  	your constituents, taking credit for all the jobs and programs that it  	creates/saves.  Then&#8230;you pronounce the plan a &#8220;<em>failure</em>&#8221; and  	apply third-grade level math to the numbers to &#8220;<em>prove</em>&#8221; your point.   	For example, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/fact-check-gop-math-suspe_n_341930.html"> the latest GOP &#8220;<em>numbers</em>&#8220;</a>&#8230;subtract <em>some</em> of the  	benefits created by the stimulus from the total cost of the bill&#8230;and they  	claim the amount left over is the &#8220;<em>shortfall</em>.&#8221;  The problem with  	this, besides the obvious over-simplification&#8230;the cost of plan is divided  	over <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ten years,</strong></span> but they are only subtracting <strong>ONE</strong> year&#8217;s worth of benefits.  As one writer put it, &#8220;<strong>it&#8217;s as if the  	10-year cost of George W. Bush&#8217;s big tax cuts were compared with the  	benefits to the economy that only accrued during the first year.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Swine Flu?  Ready for &#8220;<em>politicization</em>,&#8221; if you ask the  	Republicans.  Representative Joe &#8220;<em>You Lie</em>&#8221; Wilson (R-SC) 	<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/joe-wilson-says-obama-has-put-the-lives-of-americans-at-risk-due-to-h1n1-vaccine-shortage.php"> recently attempted</a> to blame the shortage of H1N1 vaccines on President  	Obama (<em>all experts cite supply problems</em>).  <em><strong>Perhaps Joe  	forgot:</strong></em> He voted <span style="text-decoration: underline;">against</span> vaccine funding.  Why is he so  	upset now&#8230;when he obviously didn&#8217;t think it was too important back when  	they were voting for the funding?  Oh yeah&#8230;<strong>his wife has Swine Flu</strong>.  	It&#8217;s the two things you guys <strong>NEVER</strong> seem to understand, Joe:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> First</span>, it is always better to spend some money up front to <strong>PREVENT</strong> something from happening&#8230;than it is to pay a lot of money and tears <strong> AFTER</strong> it has already happened.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Second</span>, that thing you don&#8217;t  	want to help &#8220;<em>the other guy</em>&#8221; with, because it&#8217;ll never happen to you?   	Yes, it can happen to you.</li>
<li>Remember the census worker who was found hanged?  The conservative  	officials of that county, rather than admit that the violent, anti-census  	rhetoric of some GOP legislators and FOX News may have claimed an actual  	victim&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">are still treating the case as if it might be a suicide</span>.   	That&#8217;s right, instead of admitting that some goofball got swept up in the  	anti-government incitement of Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and  	Glenn Beck&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/bill-sparkman-kentucky-ce_n_347851.html">they&#8217;re  	saying</a> that this poor guy probably stripped naked, carved &#8220;<em>FED</em>&#8221;  	on his own chest, duct-taped his hands, and hanged himself in a public area.</li>
<li>She was the GOP&#8217;s darling.  When Carrie PreJean lost the Miss  	America pageant, after answering that she did not support gay marriage,  	conservatives shouted &#8220;<em>political correctness at work!</em>&#8220;  They  	invited her to speak at conservative fundraisers, Republican events, and  	other gatherings&#8230;and she would regale them with tears and nonsensical  	statements about her First Amendment rights being violated (<em>ummm&#8230;Carrie&#8230;the  	government never stopped you from saying <strong>ANYTHING</strong></em>).  But  	now&#8230;it&#8217;s amazing how 	<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/"> one little SEX TAPE</a>, and you&#8217;re just not the spokesperson they were  	looking for anymore.  It&#8217;s so hard to maintain the appearance of  	holding the high ground&#8230;well, especially with all the affairs&#8230;oh, and  	the hooker scandals&#8230;oh, yeah, and don&#8217;t forget the little boys, and the  	airport bathrooms&#8230;.oh, heh, and getting caught in the cemetery with a hooker <strong>AND</strong> sex toys.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>I&#8217;ll keep this brief:</strong></span> Want to know how best to  	politicize health care reform?  Ask Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT).   	He tried to put 	<a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-religion3-2009nov03,0,6879249,full.story"> an amendment</a> into the health care legislation, that would force  	insurance to treat medical treatment and &#8220;<strong>Christian Science prayer  	treatments</strong>&#8220;&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>EQUALLY</strong></span>.  Some have said that this  	would violate the &#8220;<em>Separation of Church and State.</em>&#8220;  Duh.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE RECENT ELECTION&#8230;EVERYBODY WANTS TO TELL YOU WHAT IT MEANT:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Did you even know there were elections this week?  If you did, it  	was because the media certainly wanted you to get into all the &#8220;<em>drama</em>&#8221;  	they generated about them.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>I&#8217;ll provide the short version:</strong></span> Two governors races&#8230;one with a wildly unpopular Democrat who is rich, tied  	to Wall Street, and who failed to make good on promises of tax cuts.   	The other governor race&#8230;Virginia: <em>Enough said</em>.  There were  	also two state legislative races, one in a New York district that has voted  	Republican for more than one hundred years, and the other race in  	California.  Now if you listened to conservative/liberal/moderate  	media&#8230;these races would tell <strong>EXACTLY</strong> how American feels about  	President Obama, Republicans, and Democrats.  Well&#8230;<em>not really</em>.  	<em>Read on.</em></li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE RESULTS</strong></span>:  The Republican candidate beat the  	unpopular/rich/Goldman Sachs Democrat for the New Jersey governorship.   	The Republican beat the Democrat for the governorship of Virginia, for  	obvious reasons involving, <em>well</em>, Virginia.  The Democratic  	candidate won the California legislative seat, and the Democratic candidate  	won the seat in the highly conservative New York district.   Oh  	yeah&#8230;and Mayor Michael Bloomberg managed to buy back his office as  	mayor&#8230;<em>but few people cared</em>.  In truth, only one of these  	races, the New York legislative race, even involves <strong>ANYTHING</strong> worth  	talking about.  So what did the &#8220;<em>liberal</em>&#8221; media report:   	headlines everywhere reported a &#8220;<em>Republican Sweep</em>,&#8221; and proclaimed  	this a sign of the &#8220;<em>disillusionment of voters</em>&#8221; with the president.   	Stop&#8230;<strong>roll back the tape</strong>&#8230;<em>what was that?</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/the-state-of-your-post-el_n_345377.html"> Is the media so desperate</a> to create sensationalism and conflict&#8230;that  	they would proclaim the GOP &#8220;<em>reborn, revitalized, and ready to rumble</em>,&#8221;  	based on <strong>THESE</strong> election results?  Jon Stewart of The Daily Show  	tackled the issue of the media&#8217;s coverage:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254850" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254850" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>As I said, the New York legislative race was the one that was at all &#8220;<em>revealing</em>.&#8221;  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The short and sweet:</strong></span> GOP offers up a candidate, endorsed  	by House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), and the Democrats do likewise  	(<em>but the Democrats know they have <strong>NO</strong> change of winning the seat</em>).   	Sarah Palin, and the &#8220;<em>wing-nut brigade,</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/palin-tea-partiers-focus_n_342219.html"> throw their support</a> behind an &#8220;<em>Conservative Party</em>&#8221; goofball who 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/03/doug-hoffman-calls-glenn_n_343676.html"> adores Glenn Beck</a> (<em>even calls him a &#8220;mentor&#8221;</em>), and who doesn&#8217;t  	even live in the district.  Rush Limbaugh 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/limbaugh-scozzafava-guilt_n_342535.html"> accuses the GOP candidate</a> of committing &#8220;<strong>widespread bestiality.</strong>&#8220;   	Boehner and other Republicans hedge on whether they now support <strong>THEIR</strong> candidate, or the conservative goofball.  The Republican  	candidate&#8230;she gets disgusted by her own party, and throws her support  	behind the Democratic candidate&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/03/bill-owens-leads-doug-hof_n_344776.html">who  	then wins the election</a>.  	<a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B287C056-18FE-70B2-A88C6D5F0E6061E5"> Some say</a> the current attempts by conservative purists to oust <strong>ANY</strong> Republican candidates who are 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/are-moderates-no-longer-w_n_342076.html"> at all moderate</a>, or even simply reasonable&#8230;is a mistake.  At  	least, looking at these results&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>they appear to be correct</strong></span>.</li>
<li>If there is one thing Republicans <strong>SHOULD</strong> know by now&#8230;it&#8217;s that  	they can&#8217;t look to RNC chairman Michael Steele for sound guidance.   	After the elections, Steele first 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/steele-reports-of-ideolog_n_345319.html"> proclaimed</a> that there are <strong>NO</strong> ideological divisions within the  	Republican Party (<em>which we clearly know now to be false</em>)&#8230;<strong>THEN</strong>,  	Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/steele-election-results-s_n_345069.html"> calls</a> the results of the elections evidence that the GOP is now &#8220;<strong>transcendent</strong>&#8220;&#8230;<strong>THEN</strong> Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/05/quick-reversal-steele-we_n_347647.html"> admits</a> that all the intra-party fighting (which he said did exist) was &#8220;<strong>stupid</strong>&#8221;  	and that it was causing them to &#8220;<strong>screw</strong>&#8221; themselves.  Steele  	would find out what it is like to be truly screwed, when he was interviewed  	on Morning Joe alongside Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell&#8230;who congratulated him on  	leading his &#8220;<strong>party to a disastrous loss:</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gcYuJX-hzQo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gcYuJX-hzQo&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcYuJX-hzQo">www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcYuJX-hzQo</a></p></p>
<p>Hopefully we&#8217;ll be back to more regular, consistent posting next week.   Have a great weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-politicizes-all-including-tragedy-and-other-topics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

