<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; S. E. Cupp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/s-e-cupp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Look At The Great Conservative Women Calendar</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/a-look-at-the-great-conservative-women-calendar/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/a-look-at-the-great-conservative-women-calendar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clare Boothe Luce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Obenshain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellyanne Conway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marji Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Malkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. E. Cupp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Parker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often, when discussing the conservative movement, we are really only considering the opinions of a fairly specific demographic:  white men.  The movement's lack of diversity has often served as a topic of both conversation and concern, but it should be noted that conservatives do also have some prominent WOMEN among their ranks.  On Friday, the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute released its "Great American Conservative Women Calendar,"  featuring the eleven conservative women they found to be the most influential.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often, when discussing the conservative movement, we are really only  considering the opinions of a fairly specific demographic:  <strong>white men</strong>.   The movement&#8217;s lack of diversity has often served as a topic of both  conversation and concern, but it should be noted that conservatives do also have  some prominent <strong>WOMEN</strong> among their ranks.  On Friday, the Clare Boothe  Luce Policy Institute released its &#8220;<em>Great American Conservative Women  Calendar,</em>&#8220;  featuring the eleven conservative women they found to be  the most influential.  It is amusing to note that this has prompted <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/28/help-make-a-liberal-women_n_301885.html?slidenumber=1#slide_image"> the Huffington Post </a>to request reader submissions for a companion piece: The  &#8220;<em>Great American Liberal Women Calendar.</em>&#8220;  It will be interesting to  see which names are at the top of the list&#8230;especially seeing as Arianna  Huffington is quite likely to be one of them.</p>
<p>Anyway, I thought we&#8217;d take some time to look at each of these &#8220;<em>Great  Conservative Women</em>&#8220;&#8230;and to try to determine why each was chosen for  inclusion:</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 395px"><a href="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/greatconservativewomen.jpg"><img title="Great conservative women?" src="http://realityliberationfront.com/uploads/Resources/greatconservativewomen.jpg" alt="Great conservative women?" width="385" height="280" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Great conservative women?</p></div>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_Buchanan">Bay Buchanan</a>:   Having served as Treasurer of the United States under Reagan, and as Pat  Buchanan&#8217;s sister&#8230;she certainly has the pedigree and credentials.   And&#8230;she definitely shares her brother&#8217;s seething hatred towards illegal  immigrants, and is prone to the occasional, racially insensitive remark.   She came under fire when it was revealed that Marcus Epstein, an employee of  Buchanan&#8217;s and serving in both of her &#8220;<em>anti-immigrant</em>&#8221; organizations, had  been walking down the street spouting racist remarks&#8230;and decided to call a  passing African-American woman &#8220;<strong>ni**er</strong>&#8221; and karate chop her on the head.   Buchanan&#8217;s response to the media coverage&#8230;was to keep on employing Epstein and <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/06/bay-buchanan-after-assaulting-black-woman-calling-her-nigger-epstein-was-lynched.php"> to denounce the media attention</a> as &#8220;<strong>a modern day lynching by a faceless,  angry, ignorant mob who reveled in the collective assault on their victim.</strong>&#8220;   Buchanan also received a few confused looks <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/2008/02/20/bay-buchanan-on-gop-we-assume-our-candidates-have-been-loyal-to-their-family"> when she said</a> of media claims that McCain may have been unfaithful to his  wife: &#8220;<strong>This is not the Democratic Party, this is a party of values. We assume  our candidates have been loyal to their family</strong>.&#8221;  Seriously?  Has  she not been paying attention?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Parker">Star Parker</a>:   Syndicated columnist and author Star Parker is one of the best kept secrets of  the conservative movement.  This is surprising, given that she is an  African-American woman within a group that is often criticized for its lack of  diversity&#8230;you would think they would actively attempt to shine the spotlight  on her more often.  Star <a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/wingnut-welfare-queen-star-parkers-bizarro"> brings to the table</a> a rather odd and convenient (<em>for conservatives</em>)  definition of racism:  <strong>government programs&#8230;are racist</strong>.  Star  says that supporting public education&#8230;means you don&#8217;t think black kids can &#8220;<em>hack  it</em>&#8221; at private schools.  Support public assistance programs?  She  says that means you don&#8217;t think blacks are capable of getting jobs.  She is  even willing to throw African-Americans under the bus <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200906120019">in order to voice</a> her anti-Muslim views: &#8220;<strong>I think it&#8217;s underappreciated just how entrenched  hatred toward Jews are in the &#8212; in some parts of the black community. In fact,  radical Muslim influence has been growing in these communities for years through  leaders from Louis Farrakhan, Malcolm X, others. They have a huge economy in  most black communities and black neighborhoods. They&#8217;ve been recruited in our  prisons, these young men, for decades.  I don&#8217;t know how many even know  that we today have sitting congressional black caucus members, too, that are  Muslims, one from the state of Minnesota, where they&#8217;ve had deep problems with  extremism, everything from Muslim taxi drivers who refuse to carry passengers  that have liquor to Muslim grocery store clerks who refuse to let people buy  pork.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kate_Obenshain_Griffin">Kate Obenshain</a>:   This former chair of Virginia&#8217;s Republican Party, is rumored to be considering a  run for the Lieutenant Governor&#8217;s seat in Virginia next year.  Obenshain&#8230;is  a conservative&#8217;s dream:  hates Obama, hates big government, and  pro-feminist as long as &#8220;<em>feminism</em>&#8221; means &#8220;<em>supporting any woman running  for office</em>,&#8221; regardless of any other considerations.  Obenshein can turn  on a dime:  one minute <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200711050004">she is criticizing</a> Hillary Clinton for changing her positions on issues, making the incredible  sexist remark that Clinton &#8220;<strong>continued to obfuscate, and then she ran to  Wellesley and hid behind the skirts&#8230;and said, &#8216;Those big&#8230;mean boys were  picking on me&#8217;&#8230;instead of being able to state her positions</strong>&#8220;&#8230;the next  minute she <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/21/radical-feminisms-mighty-foe/"> is proclaiming</a> Hillary&#8217;s defeat by Obama the &#8220;<em>death of feminism.</em>&#8220;   She <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/peggy/kate-obenshain-defends-barack-the-magic-negro"> publicly defended</a> the &#8220;<em>Barack the Magic Negro</em>&#8221; song&#8230;and later drew  fire when she stated that Obama had the lowest approval rating of any president  at that point in their administration, when the polls under discussion&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200904290037">showed  just the opposite</a>.  If you want to get a sense of Obershain&#8217;s level of  understanding of complex issues&#8230;<a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2008/06/22/republican_strategist_kate_obenshain_twists_into_a_pretzel_trying_to_evade_colmes_question_whether_iran_has_become_more_of_a_threat_since_the_iraq_war.php">visit  here</a> for her virtual &#8220;<em>non-participation</em>&#8221; in a conversation about  Iran.  The other guests are making actual points while Obershain can, as  usual, only contribute snarky remarks.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Malkin">Michelle Malkin</a>:   Malkin, a blogger, commentator, and syndicated columnist represents &#8220;<em>one-stop-shopping</em>&#8221;  for anti-immigrant views and right-wing conspiracy theories.  Malkin drew  perhaps the most controversy when she wrote a book&#8230;<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=12&amp;url=http://mediamatters.org/research/200408110001&amp;ei=dhnBSvTDOtqB8Qawv7muAQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNGGMz8Co0TtEkmHvzw4Yi_i9UJgvQ">defending</a> the United States&#8217; use of internment camps for incarcerating the nation&#8217;s  Japanese-American citizens, and by extension, defending the use of &#8220;<em>racial  profiling</em>&#8221; today.  She has also attracted criticism <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=2&amp;url=http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/you-stay-classy-michelle-malkin-poses&amp;ei=PxnBStqcONKl8AbwlvChAQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNEvY40FJ9tmxpRo-J-lU5OaaKbnXg"> when she</a> posed for a picture with a man holding a sign with a swastika on  it&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200909280025">when she</a> recently  argued that Obama speaking to the nation&#8217;s schoolchildren represented &#8220;<strong>indoctrination</strong>&#8220;&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/clips/200907290007">when  she</a> called Obama a &#8220;<strong>racial opportunist</strong>&#8221; on the Today Show&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/clips/200905200045">when  she</a> said &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;ve lost plenty of liberties</strong>&#8221; under Obama and that almost  all of our rights have been compromised.  The list goes on&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">try this</span>:   go to the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/michelle_malkin"> MediaMatters website</a> results for Michelle Malkin and scroll down&#8230;and  down&#8230;and down&#8230;and that&#8217;s just page one of three.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clare_Boothe_Luce">Clare Boothe Luce</a>:   It&#8217;s almost sad that Luce&#8217;s name has become associated with the other women on  this list, as it is the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute that puts out the  calendar.  Luce was a highly intelligent, moderate woman, with a passion  for the fight for universal suffrage for women&#8230;and she was one of the first  women to serve in Congress.  While serving, she openly objected to the  Democratic administration&#8217;s foreign policy&#8230;but backed the administration on  several other policies, including aid to victims of WWII.  No real  controversies&#8230;other than strong anti-communism sentiments (<em>certainly not  unusual given the time period</em>), she held no extreme viewpoints.   Intelligent&#8230;fiscally conservative (<em>back when people actually knew what that  meant</em>)&#8230;compassionate&#8230;moderate.</p>
<p>Marji Ross:  You&#8217;ve probably never heard her name&#8230;but as head of <a href="http://www.regnery.com/index.html">Regnery Publishing</a>, a publisher  of right-wing materials, she is the answer to the question you have asked  whenever you&#8217;ve seen the latest Anne Coulter/Michelle Malkin/Bay Buchanan book  and wondered, &#8220;<em>who publishes this sh*t.</em>&#8220;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">She does.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllis_Schlafly">Phyllis Schlafly</a>:   Author, socialite, activist&#8230;in many ways Schlafly is the &#8220;<em>grand dame</em>&#8221;  of conservatism.  And&#8230;I suppose it is easier to be a woman in the  Republican Party if, like Schlafly, you have been a lifelong <strong>OPPONENT</strong> <a href="http://www.campusprogress.org/tools/209/">of feminism and equal rights</a> for women.  She went on record as saying she would cancel speeches if her  husband thought she were away from home too much and that she doesn&#8217;t believe  that a husband can rape his wife: &#8220;<strong>By getting married, the woman has  consented to sex, and I don&#8217;t think you can call it rape.</strong>&#8220;  That&#8217;s  Phyllis Schlafly, ladies and gentlemen:  leading the conservative  movement&#8230;into the eighteenth century.  Most recently, she chimed in on  the &#8220;<em>Obama wants to kill granny</em>&#8221; myth&#8230;<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200908100007">you  can guess on which side</a>.  We can safely say that if anything would cause Clare Boothe Luce to spin in her grave&#8230;it would be Schlafly&#8217;s inclusion on this list.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kellyanne_Conway">Kellyanne Conway</a>:   Conway is a regular &#8220;<em>talking head</em>&#8221; as well as a Republican strategist and  head of a conservative polling company.  A master of the fine, deceptive  art of hyperbole, Conway&#8217;s hits include <a href="http://clips.mediamatters.org/research/200711210001">suggesting</a> that political correctness will lead to non-English speaking air traffic  controllers, and planes crashing into each other&#8230;<a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2007/08/20/hannity_and_kellyanne_conway_fall_over_themselves_trying_to_defend_giulianis_badhusband_behavior.php">defending</a> Giuliani&#8217;s marital infidelity by bringing up Obama&#8217;s former pastor (<em>yeah, I  know&#8230;I don&#8217;t get it either</em>)&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200805210008">stating</a> that McCain had been completely consistent in his votes on war funding (<em><strong>WILDLY</strong> wrong</em>)&#8230;and on Larry King, making <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD113L3h1cQ">a flagrantly racist remark</a> about whether Hillary Clinton should &#8220;<strong>let [Obama] SIT ON THE BACK OF THE BUS  of her presidential ticket.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter">Anne Coulter</a>:   Commentator, author, syndicated columnist&#8230;if it&#8217;s offensive <strong>AND</strong> conservative, chances are that Coulter said it.  If you think MediaMatters  has a lot of material on Michelle Malkin, its <a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/ann_coulter">five pages of links</a> to Coulter-related items barely scratches the surface of a woman known for three  things:  talking over people&#8230;making offensive comments based on  race/gender/sexuality&#8230;and having <strong>ALL</strong> of her facts wrong.  Coulter is, perhaps, best known for making the rounds of the morning talk shows&#8230;while whining that she is denied coverage by the mainstream media.  There is  really too much to describe here, so I&#8217;ll give you <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200703030002">one Coulter quote</a> that exemplifies her generally depraved level of dialogue: &#8220;<strong>Oh, and I was  going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate,  John Edwards. But it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the  word &#8216;faggot,&#8217; so I&#8217;m&#8230;so I&#8217;m kind of at an impasse, can&#8217;t really talk about  Edwards. So I think I&#8217;ll just conclude here and take your questions.</strong>&#8221; <em> Classy</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=5&amp;url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Bachmann&amp;ei=BiPBStChLMyZ8AbX4OylAQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNFxCFnUjMjCk6IK27wWiZ-W7KkT4w"> Michele Bachmann</a>:  The Representative from Minnesota has both her  constituents walking away from her&#8230;as well as the rest of her party, for  comments she has made ranging from religious fanaticism (<em>like saying the  recession could be ended through &#8220;fasting and prayer&#8221;</em>) to advocating armed  insurrection (<em>like saying people might have to exercise their &#8220;Second  Amendment rights&#8221; to &#8220;take back&#8221; the country</em>).  During the presidential  campaign she got a lot of attention for saying that there were some &#8220;<em>un-American</em>&#8221;  members of Congress that needed to be ferreted out, and most recently, she has  been <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=2&amp;url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/01/michele-bachmanns-census_n_224175.html&amp;ei=xCPBSpaqAtLP8QbJ2YnBAQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNHmNbNXCb5s0rthhPaIXTkNKjvlVg"> publicly sponsoring</a> several conspiracy theories regarding the U.S.  Census&#8230;and has come under fire after a census worker was found murdered with  the word &#8220;<strong>Fed</strong>&#8221; written on his chest.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.E._Cupp">S. E. Cupp</a>:  A  relatively unknown writer and commentator, a contributor to Politico.com and a  frequent guest on Fox.  Pretty lame contributions to the political debate:  <em>Democrats are going to tax you</em>&#8230;yadda yadda&#8230;<em>Obama wants to  indoctrinate your children</em>&#8230;yadda yadda&#8230;<em>Obama is to blame for the  &#8216;unfair&#8217; treatment of poor Sarah Palin</em>&#8230;blah blah blah&#8230;</p>
<p>Of course, the GOP&#8217;s tendency to act from a predominantly chauvinist  perspective, no doubt, prevents some women from wishing to be associated with  the political party <strong>OR</strong> the ideological movement&#8230;for example, just  recently Senator Kyl of Arizona <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/25/kyl-i-dont-need-maternity_n_300367.html"> tried to remove</a> maternity coverage from Health Insurance requirements  because men don&#8217;t need it, and Texas Governor Rick Perry&#8217;s consultant said that  allowing Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson to run for governor, in order to attract  more women&#8217;s support, would be a bad idea because you don&#8217;t want to &#8220;<strong>take  your principles and throw them out the door and become a whorehouse and let  anybody in who wants to come in, regardless.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><em>An interesting exclusion</em>:  No Liz Cheney?  Despite the fact  that her entire platform seems to consist of stubbornly defending even the most  ridiculous of her father&#8217;s statements and policies&#8230;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/us/politics/28cheney.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">many  seem to think</a> she represents the future of the party.  Time will tell,  I suppose&#8230;</p>
<p>Either way, I have to say that it seems sad that this list is mostly comprised of commentators and columnists&#8230;many who are known more for being offensive and dogmatic than they are for making real contributions to either society or to intellectual debate.  It appears that the conservative movement&#8230;is STILL looking for a few good women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/a-look-at-the-great-conservative-women-calendar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

