<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Senator Burr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/senator-burr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Tries, Fails To Distract Americans From Health Care Issue</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Paul Eaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic Heritage Month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Hensarling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the successful passage of a health care reform bill becoming increasingly optimistic, and public support for a government-run plan on the rise...what is a Republican to do? Wage a counter-offensive? No. Propose their own solutions to America's problems? No. Join in, and try to look like they're supporting health care reform? No. Quietly campaign for re-election back home? No. Of course...they'll do what they did for the last eight years, when America's attention was not where THEY wanted it to be: They'll try to DISTRACT US. Only this time...it's not working...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Senate Finance Committee&#8217;s bill&#8217;s passage, the health care reform  debate moves on to talks of reconciling that bill with the others produced by  the House and Senate.  Reports <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/public-option-within-eigh_n_328561.html"> have come out</a> that in the House, a robust public option may require only 8  more votes to pass&#8230;and many speculate that a somewhat less robust public  option could pass both House and Senate.  As each day passes, Democrats  appear to be speaking a bit more positively about their chances for  success&#8230;and each weekly poll shows an uptick in public support for some form  of government-run health insurance, which no doubt contributes to the Democrats&#8217;  optimism.</p>
<p><em>So</em>.  <strong>What is a Republican to do?</strong></p>
<p>Launch a fruitless counter-offensive, that will be hindered by the fact that,  over time, Americans are becoming more knowledgeable about the subject of health  care?</p>
<p>Launch their own campaign to pass an important bill in some other policy area  of their choosing?</p>
<p>Join in health care talks, so at least when the bill passes they can try to  claim they were involved, and not simply obstructing?</p>
<p>Keep quiet on policy issues, meanwhile starting their campaigns for  re-election back in their home states and districts?</p>
<p><strong>No. No. No. Definitely not.</strong></p>
<p>They&#8217;ll do what they have found so effective in the past&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">they&#8217;ll try to  distract.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>AFGHANISTAN:</strong></span> After a brief hiatus, former Vice President  Dick Cheney has again emerged&#8230;to question President Obama&#8217;s &#8220;<em>war credentials</em>&#8221;  and to claim that we are &#8220;<em>less safe</em>,&#8221; despite all reports and studies to the  contrary.  In <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33426929/ns/politics-white_house/">his  latest effort</a> to both criticize and distract, Cheney accused the president  of &#8220;<strong>dithering</strong>&#8221; and of hurting the troops while helping the enemy: &#8220;<strong>Make no  mistake. Signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden  our adversaries.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps the former veep is simply unfamiliar and  uncomfortable with gathering information from generals and experts, in an  attempt to make good decisions based on a thorough understanding of the  situation, instead of making quick decisions based only on gut feelings and prayer.  <a href="http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/1442">Who better to respond</a> to Cheney&#8217;s claims than National Security Network Senior  Adviser Gen. Paul Eaton (Ret.): &#8220;<strong>The record is clear: Dick Cheney and the Bush administration were  	incompetent war fighters. They ignored Afghanistan for 7 years with a crude  	approach to counter-insurgency warfare best illustrated by: 1. Deny it.  2.   	Ignore it. 3. Bomb it. While our intelligence agencies called the region the  	greatest threat to America, the Bush White House under-resourced our  	military efforts, shifted attention to Iraq, and failed to bring to justice  	the masterminds of September 11.  The only time Cheney and his cabal of foreign policy &#8216;experts&#8217; have  	anything to say is when they feel compelled to protect this failed legacy.  	While President Obama is tasked with cleaning up the considerable mess they  	left behind, they continue to defend torture or rewrite a legacy of  	indifference on Afghanistan. Simply put, Mr. Cheney sees history throughout  	extremely myopic and partisan eyes.</strong>&#8220;  Cheney&#8217;s statements also  resulted in a rather entertaining exchange between MSNBC&#8217;s Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell  and Joe Scarborough:</p>
<div><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/33429070#33429070" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 425px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">News about the Economy</a></p>
</div>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE ECONOMY:</strong></span> When they&#8217;re not claiming that the stimulus  has failed, while simultaneously taking credit for its successes (<em>latest  example in a growing trend <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/richard-burr-stimulus-hyp_n_327640.html"> here</a>, courtesy of Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</em>), Republicans are either  criticizing Obama for failing to impose strict new regulations on banks and Wall  Street&#8230;or they are criticizing Obama&#8217;s efforts to impose strict new  regulations on banks and Wall Street.  Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/10/20/hensarling-trumps-consumers/"> has proposed an amendment</a> to the House Financial Services Committee&#8217;s new  Consumer Protection bill&#8230;that would allow federal bank regulators (<em>who many  have claimed are a bit too friendly with the Wall Street institutions</em>) to &#8220;<em>veto</em>&#8221;  any of the protections in the bill if they thought the protections might  threaten the &#8220;<strong>safety and soundness</strong>&#8221; of the financial institutions.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Translated into normal people-speak:</span> Hensarling thinks that risky  schemes, if they provide a bank/institution&#8217;s a lot of money, should be  allowed&#8230;customer protection be damned.  Hensarling said: &#8220;<strong>The  safety and soundness of the system, taxpayer protection, ought to trump the  ability to ban financial products</strong>. <strong>And let’s face it, I understand  the chairman said that this new CFPA would not have the ability to set goals,  but if you control the product mix, if you can ban products, if you can modify  their terms, of what some have estimated could be as much as 10 to 15 percent of  our economy, then yes,</strong> <strong>I conclude you can adversely impact the  safety and soundness of these institutions</strong>.&#8221;  Again&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">this  distraction is not likely to be successful:</span> the American people are  less likely to support a legislator saying we ought to protect banks&#8217; ability to  make profit at our expense&#8230;and more likely to support a president who is about  to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/business/smallbusiness/22small.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business"> bail out small businesses</a>, and to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/obama-pay-cuts-white-hous_n_328928.html"> restrict the salaries and compensation</a> of bailed-out CEO&#8217;s.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>IMMIGRATION:</strong></span> When in doubt, the GOP loves to fall back on  an old standard: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">xenophobia</span>.  It&#8217;s perhaps odd that there are some  within the Republican Party (<em>hint: her name rhymes with Lishelle Mockman</em>)  claiming that the U.S. Census is some insidious attempt for President Obama to  gather all of your precious personal data&#8230;and there are other Republicans,  like Senator David Vitter (R-LA) and Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT), who now <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/77550.html">want the Census</a> to  ask <strong>EVEN MORE</strong> questions.  Specifically&#8230;they want to add questions  regarding <span style="text-decoration: underline;">citizenship and legal residency status</span>.  Opponents claim  that this would dramatically reduce participation in the Census&#8230;and that <strong> THAT</strong> is perhaps the true goal of the amendment&#8217;s proponents.  Perhaps  the GOP thinks that because Obama has taken few steps to address immigration  issues, that the issue is ripe for creating distraction and dissent&#8230;they are  neglecting, of course, that all polls show that &#8220;<em>immigration</em>&#8221; is pretty  low on a lot of Americans&#8217; lists of &#8220;<em>political priority</em>,&#8221; and that  current studies show that the recession has resulted in fewer and fewer people  even trying to come into our country.  It&#8217;s also ironic&#8230;that the GOP  would choose <strong>Hispanic Heritage Month</strong>, when the media is flooded with  positive stories about America&#8217;s Latino community and their contributions to our  country, as the right time to try to play off of some people&#8217;s bigotry towards  Hispanics.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>RANDOM WINGNUTTERY:</strong></span> Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN)  thought it wise to insert himself into the merry little war between the White  House and FOX News.  For those who&#8217;ve not been following this story, it  began with a statement from a White House advisor, insisting that FOX News  contained no actual &#8220;<em>news</em>&#8221; and was instead serving as a media outlet for GOP  talking points.  This was, of course, an unnecessary point to make, seeing  as most people <em>already know this</em> to be true about FOX&#8230;and those who  don&#8217;t, will never accept it as true because they never watch anything <strong>EXCEPT  FOX</strong>.  The gauntlet having been thrown, the debate has resulted in a series  of back-and-forth retorts amount to little more that &#8220;<em>Yuh-huh!</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>Nuh-uh!</em>&#8220;   Anyone with any political savvy or simple good sense would know not to become  embroiled in such a fray&#8230;.enter Senator Alexander.  From the Senate  floor, Alexander cautioned the President against forming some sort of &#8220;<strong>enemies  list</strong>&#8221; containing the names of political opponents, and organizations like FOX  News.  <em>Of course</em>&#8230;there is absolutely <strong>no</strong> evidence that the President has  any such list, <strong>nor</strong> that he is intending to formulate such a list&#8230;which is why  many, <a href="http://blogs.nashvillescene.com/pitw/2009/10/lamar_comes_unhinged_on_senate.php"> such as Nashville journalist and blogger Jeff Woods</a>, did not take long to  criticize Alexander&#8217;s &#8220;<em>advice</em>&#8221; to the President.  Instead of rushing to FOX&#8217;s defense, Lamar may want to do what the rest of his party is doing&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28589.html">distancing  themselves</a> from the network, and other rabidly conservative outlets.   Here&#8217;s Lamar&#8217;s speech, <em>just for laughs</em>:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0y1FU2WGDrM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0y1FU2WGDrM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0y1FU2WGDrM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0y1FU2WGDrM</a></p></p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to see why these tactics will prove less effective than in times  past:  America&#8217;s attention right now is squarely on health care&#8230;<strong>and the  GOP is partly responsible for that.</strong> In stirring up the right to believe  that the health care issue is a &#8220;<em>struggle to save America from communism/fascism/tyranny</em>&#8220;&#8230;in  scaring seniors into believing that &#8220;<em>the government is trying to kill you</em>&#8220;&#8230;in  telling recession-weary Americans that regulating/reforming insurance companies  will spell &#8220;<em>financial doom</em>&#8221; for small businesses and families&#8230;the Republican  Party has convinced the American people of something that Democrats <span style="text-decoration: underline;">also</span> wished  for our citizens to realize:  our nation&#8217;s health care system&#8217;s problems  are <strong>INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT</strong>.  By not listening to the American people, and not  realizing that the overwhelming majority of people think health care reform is  absolutely necessary and needs to happen <strong>RIGHT NOW</strong>, Republicans don&#8217;t seem to  realize that we are locked into this one, particular battle until it is  concluded&#8230;<em>and little else will draw our attention away</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/gop-tries-fails-to-distract-americans-from-health-care-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Waterboarding Grandkids, Possum Meat, Nazi Golfers</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Castellanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Values Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Ratigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keep American Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcia Greenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF's weekly "Chaos Theory Edition" where we wrap up the remaining strange news items from the week.  Only four categories this week, but lots of links and clips.  Let's get started...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF&#8217;s  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; where we wrap up the remaining strange news  items from the week.</p>
<p>Only four categories this week&#8230;but lots of links, so <em>let&#8217;s get started</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>We&#8217;ve all been witness to the GOP&#8217;s recent &#8220;<em>enlightenment</em>&#8221;  	regarding the nation&#8217;s debt.  For the last eight years, while they held  	the reins of Congress, the rampant government spending was &#8220;<em>absolutely  	necessary</em>.&#8221;  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now:</span></strong> It&#8217;s the equivalent of kicking our  	grandchildren in the teeth.  Or, as Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma)  	recently put it, it&#8217;s the equivalent of &#8220;<strong>waterboarding</strong>&#8221; them.  	<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62973-its-coburn-vs-krugman-on-spending"> Coburn said</a>, &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;re going to waterboard them.  We&#8217;re going to  	flood them with debt.</strong>&#8220;  Senator Coburn was referring to a program  	funding the study of political science, which 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/08/coburn-political-science/"> Coburn claims is not necessary</a>&#8230;since people can learn all that  	they need to know about politics from <strong>CABLE NEWS</strong>.  It&#8217;s suddenly  	quite obvious where <strong>HE</strong> learned most of what <strong>HE</strong> knows  	about it&#8230;</li>
<li>It&#8217;s an established fact that Republicans have had some difficulty  	adjusting to the &#8220;<em>internet age</em>&#8220;&#8230;perhaps best displayed by the fact  	that most of them don&#8217;t seem to realize that if they say something that  	directly contradicts what they said one year ago, the clip of both  	statements will be on <em>YouTube</em> before the day is out.  Want to  	see a slideshow of the &#8220;<em>Top Nine Republican Internet Fails</em>?&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/republican-internet-fails_n_319574.html"> Here you go</a>&#8230;</li>
<li>The number one problem with allying oneself with a minority of loud,  	activist, ignorant, and unreasonable people&#8230;is that you suddenly lose the  	support of the much larger body of normal, moderate, sane folks.  Want  	to see what happens if you try to win the moderate people back by behaving  	like a reasonable human being, open to compromise and the good ideas of  	others?  Watch here as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) finds out what  	happens when the lunatics figure out that you are not really one of them:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Liz Cheney is not quite done fighting her father&#8217;s battles&#8230;no matter  	how many times she appears on discussion panels and is identified as having  	the foreign policy knowledge of a teenager.  Now 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28212.html">she has  	formed</a> the &#8220;<em>Keep America Safe</em>&#8221; organization, whose mission  	statement claims to support &#8220;<strong>an unapologetic approach to fighting  	terrorism around the world, for victory in the wars this country fights, for  	democracy and human rights, and for a strong American military that is  	needed in the dangerous world in which we live.</strong>&#8220;  Ms.  	Cheney&#8230;first of all, even if we look only at the fact that planes have not  	crashed into buildings this year, President Obama <strong>ALREADY</strong> has a  	better track record than your father had, in terms of keeping the country  	safe.  Secondly, Obama has succeeded in gaining international allies  	in the struggle against terrorists&#8230;allies that your father helped to  	alienate.  And third, well, I think the DNC put it best in their  	response: &#8220;<strong>Last fall, the American people overwhelmingly rejected a  	radical foreign policy authored by Dick Cheney that alienated our allies,  	emboldened our enemies, depleted our resources, distracted our focus and  	made the nation less secure. The Cheneys lost that debate and their approach  	was deemed a failure. The Cheneys can continue to focus on securing their  	sullied legacy if they want to. But, the President will continue to focus on  	securing the country.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Exactly</em>.</li>
<li>Retaining his crown as &#8220;<em>King of the Bizarre Analogy</em>,&#8221; RNC  	Chariman Michael Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/michael-steele-cow-on-the_n_321121.html"> said in a recent FOX interview</a> that he feels like&#8230;well&#8230;health care  	reform is a &#8220;<strong>train</strong>,&#8221; and President Obama is the conductor, and Obama  	is trying to get all the Republicans to get on board, and Steele sees  	himself as a &#8220;<strong>cow on the tracks.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Ok, sure.</em></li>
<li>I mentioned in a previous post, one way that you know that the GOP is  	focused on simply <strong>OPPOSING EVERYTHING</strong> is when a number of GOP  	legislators vote against Senator Franken&#8217;s first bill:  a bill <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> protecting rape victims</span>, working for companies with government  	contracts.  Here&#8217;s Jon Stewart, who points out what should be an  	obvious truth: &#8220;<strong>If, to protect Halliburton, you have to side against rape  	victims, you might want to rethink your allegiances.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>It recently came to light, in part because of the work done by the  	National Women&#8217;s Law Center, that in eight states, insurance companies can  	and do consider being the victim of spousal abuse a &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition</em>&#8221; that allows them to deny coverage.  State and  	Federal representatives from most of the eight states expressed immediate  	embarrassment and outrage over the situation, and most have already taken  	steps to remedy the matter. <strong>But not Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</strong>.   	When the president of the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, Marcia Greenberger, 	<a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_10_15/2009_10_15.html"> appeared before a Senate committee</a> to discuss the issue, Burr thought it  	appropriate to repeatedly interrupt and otherwise disrespect her:</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>:  If I could  get back to your question about the specific examples: they manifest themselves  in many different ways. For example, if a woman ends up in an emergency room  with cuts, bruises, broken arms, black eyes, typical injuries that result from  domestic violence, we know of instances where women are being denied insurance  coverage and neither the insurance company&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: My question&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;doesn&#8217;t view  that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;is specifically about  North Carolina&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;and I&#8217;m trying  to answer that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;and the insurance  commissioner tells me we haven&#8217;t had a case. We haven&#8217;t had anybody&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: Well, I&#8217;m trying  to explain. First, I think it&#8217;s great that he is now explicitly having a rule,  which as our report pointed out, didn&#8217;t exist before. So that&#8217;s really  excellent, because of the way insurance companies deal with this issue in  particular. They will often deny the coverage of victims and survivors of  domestic violence without saying that that&#8217;s the reason&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;I&#8217;m just going by  your report&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: You asked the  question about did we follow up and we did. </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: Well, I found more  information in my one call to North Carolina than I think your report did. </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Again?</em> Representative Bill Otto (R-Kansas) has obviously  	not been paying attention.  First he 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a video</a> on YouTube titled &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he raps (<em>and  	badly</em>) his various criticisms of President Obama, and about eating  	opossum, which he calls &#8220;<strong>the other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;  This obviously  	drew allegations of racism (<em>at a minimum it is childish, insensitive, and  	inane</em>), and eventually the clip was removed from the site.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/bill-otto-says-he-will-re_n_323686.html"> And now</a>&#8230;Otto says he&#8217;s going to repost the video, because it was his  	adult daughters who took the video down, and also because he fears that &#8220;<strong>People  	are going to think that this was done by people to shut me up.  I&#8217;m  	getting hate e-mails from Maryland to California, but, hey, that&#8217;s part of  	the game.</strong>&#8220;  Mr. Otto:  It&#8217;s not a <em>game</em>, it&#8217;s civil  	service and <strong>YOU</strong> are an elected official, <em>jackass</em>.  Next  	time, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">listen to your daughters</span>&#8230;and try to learn from the lessons of  	other, like the <strong>OTHER</strong> Kansas legislator who just recently got in a  	heap of trouble 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Kansas_Rep_GOP_needs_great_white_hope.html"> for saying</a> that the GOP is looking for a &#8220;<strong>great white hope</strong>&#8221; to  	defeat Obama.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Want the &#8220;<em>short version</em>&#8221; of the merry war between the White House  	and <em>FOX News</em>?  Here goes&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>WHITE HOUSE:</strong></span> FOX News <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/anita-dunn-fox-news-an-ou_n_316691.html"> serves as the propaganda arm</a> of the Republican Party.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BILL O&#8217;REILLY:</strong></span> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bill-oreilly-glenn-beck-d_n_318085.html"> Nuh uh</a>&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA MATTERS:</strong></span> Umm&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/fox_news_channel?tab=all">it&#8217;s  pretty obvious</a>, guys&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GLENN BECK:</strong></span> The administration is like the Nazis&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/glenn-beck-compares-fox-n_n_318784.html">and  we&#8217;re the Jews</a>!</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NEW STUDY:</strong></span> Not only is it true, but we found something  interesting:  Most of the anti-Obama forces aren&#8217;t particularly  racist&#8230;the only thing they have in common is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/gop-base-driven-by-bizarr_n_323796.html"> they all watch FOX News</a>, and because of this&#8230;<em>they believe some pretty  outlandish sh-t.</em></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s fun picking on CNN&#8217;s inability to both perform research and report  	news.  It&#8217;s especially fun&#8230;if you&#8217;re Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember the rather bizarre reactions from some members of the media  	when Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize?  Well, Rachel Maddow thinks it  	can all be explained by &#8220;<em>Obama Derangement Syndrome:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>By now you&#8217;ve heard that the Senate Finance Committee managed to pass  	the &#8220;<em>Baucus Bill.</em>&#8220;  You also heard that Republican Olympia Snowe  	(R-Maine) voted along with the Democrats to send the bill on.  And  	recently, 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33308113/ns/politics-health_care_reform/"> it may have come to your attention</a> that another Maine Republican,  	Senator Susan Collins, may also lend her support for the bill.  Well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/exclusive-moveon-whacks-f_n_318640.html"> MoveOn.org</a>, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal  	Employees, the AFL-CIO, and the Communications Workers of America would like  	to remind you:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/senate-health-bill-oppose_n_318920.html"> it&#8217;s a CRAPPY bill</a>, that would make a mountain of money for the  	insurance companies, would change little in the way they do business, and  	would <strong>NOT</strong> serve to get all of America&#8217;s uninsured the health care coverage  	that they need.  In fact&#8230;any <strong>OTHER</strong> House and Senate version  	might just be a better choice.</li>
<li><strong><em>Thank you, Captain Obvious:</em></strong> The most ridiculously  	unnecessary headline in health care reform news 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/13/AR2009101303472.html">comes courtesy</a> of <em>The Washington  	Post</em>:  &#8220;<strong>Health Insurers Emerge as Obama&#8217;s Top Foe in Reform  	Effort.</strong>&#8221; That&#8217;s right&#8230;.&#8221;<em>emerging</em>&#8220;&#8230;as if it weren&#8217;t  	always the case.</li>
<li>Think only our elected officials are in the pocket of the health  	insurance industry&#8230;but our stalwart media will be there to keep us  	informed of the truth regarding the health care debate.  <em>Maybe not.</em> CNN contributor, Alex Castellanos&#8230;has been 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140037">revealed</a> to be  	connected at the hip with America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (<em>AHIP</em>),  	the monolithic insurance lobby currently (<em>and ferociously</em>)  	campaigning to kill reform legislation.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t generally hear about &#8220;<em>progressive faith groups</em>,&#8221; but  	the <em>American Values Network</em> aims to change that.  They are 	<a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/healthcare/faces-ad/">currently  	releasing ads</a>&#8230;emphasizing the moral and religious arguments supporting  	heath care reform.  It&#8217;s not a difficult argument to make, and  	represents one of the best examples of &#8220;<em>fighting fire with fire</em>&#8221; that  	we have seen in a long time.</li>
<li>Is it obvious that former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has a new  	book out?  Not only has he been making the usual talk show rounds, but  	he also managed to inject a little sanity into the health care debate.   	Of right-wing assertions that the Obama plan represents &#8220;<em>socialized  	medicine</em>&#8221; and warrants comparisons to Britain, Canada, and France, Frist 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3tLHqGz7uE&amp;feature=player_embedded"> said on C-SPAN</a>, &#8220;<strong>What the Obama administration is doing is not  	socialized medicine.  Socialized medicine is where the government owns  	the hospitals, owns the doctors, and decides how people get paid.</strong>&#8220;   	Yes&#8230;thank you&#8230;<em>finally</em>&#8230;is everybody listening?</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>In Lakeville, Massachusetts, someone 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/10/13/swastika-obama-carved-int_ws_319331.html"> carved a swastika</a> and the word &#8220;<strong>Obama</strong>&#8221; into a golf course green.   	The course manager believes that someone used either a cleated golf shoe  	or some other tool to perform the vandalism.  Strange&#8230;one would certainly think  	that America&#8217;s golfers have had some extra time to get used to the idea of  	having a very popular, half African-American leader.</li>
<li><em><strong>NEW HERO:</strong></em> Dylan Ratigan hosts the &#8220;<em>Morning Meeting</em>&#8221;  	show on MSNBC, and lately has shown to be a tough, bright host&#8230;who knows  	how to play hardball.  In 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/dylan-ratigan-to-chamber_n_320397.html"> a recent interview</a> with Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S.  	Chamber of Commerce, Ratigan responded to Donohue&#8217;s attempts to claim that  	free, unfettered enterprise has the solutions to all problems by saying, &#8220;<strong>unless  	the government and people like you that lobby to the exemptions that allow  	banks to [speculate with taxpayer money] get out of the way, we will never  	have fair play again in this country and we&#8217;ll have job creation by virtue  	of taxpayer theft, which is ultimately destructive, and I would argue,  	treasonous to this country.</strong>&#8220;  When Donohue complained that, in  	essence, it&#8217;s harder to spread economic propaganda when the host asks hard  	questions, Ratigan responded, &#8220;<strong>Yes, it is.  Especially when you talk  	nonsense.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em><strong>Oh no they didn&#8217;t:</strong></em> The White House decided to take a  	play out of the &#8220;<em>Sarah Palin Media Strategy</em>&#8221; book, when confronted  	with the mounting criticism in the blogosphere regarding the  	administration&#8217;s failure to achieve civil rights goals for gay citizens.   	NBC White House Correspondent John Harwood 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-furious-at-white_n_317424.html"> reported</a>, &#8220;<strong>For a sign of how seriously the White House does or  	doesn&#8217;t take this opposition, one adviser told me today those bloggers need  	to take off their pajamas, get dressed and realize that governing a  	closely-divided country is complicated and difficult.</strong>&#8220;  <em> Caaaarefullll</em>.  Remember the role bloggers played getting Obama <em> into</em> the White House?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>UPDATE:</strong></span> The White House 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/white-house-disavows-claim-that-gay-critics-bloggers-are-part-of-internet-left-fringe/"> would like to disavow those comments</a>&#8230;never happened&#8230;nothing to see  	here.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now what could we possibly add to all that?  As CNN would say, we&#8217;ll &#8220;<em>leave  it there</em>&#8221; for now&#8230;and see you back here on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

