<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Senator Graham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/senator-graham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Waterboarding Grandkids, Possum Meat, Nazi Golfers</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Castellanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Values Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Ratigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keep American Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcia Greenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Otto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF's weekly "Chaos Theory Edition" where we wrap up the remaining strange news items from the week.  Only four categories this week, but lots of links and clips.  Let's get started...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long week, and what better way to end it than with the RLF&#8217;s  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory Edition</em>&#8221; where we wrap up the remaining strange news  items from the week.</p>
<p>Only four categories this week&#8230;but lots of links, so <em>let&#8217;s get started</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>We&#8217;ve all been witness to the GOP&#8217;s recent &#8220;<em>enlightenment</em>&#8221;  	regarding the nation&#8217;s debt.  For the last eight years, while they held  	the reins of Congress, the rampant government spending was &#8220;<em>absolutely  	necessary</em>.&#8221;  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now:</span></strong> It&#8217;s the equivalent of kicking our  	grandchildren in the teeth.  Or, as Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma)  	recently put it, it&#8217;s the equivalent of &#8220;<strong>waterboarding</strong>&#8221; them.  	<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/62973-its-coburn-vs-krugman-on-spending"> Coburn said</a>, &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;re going to waterboard them.  We&#8217;re going to  	flood them with debt.</strong>&#8220;  Senator Coburn was referring to a program  	funding the study of political science, which 	<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/08/coburn-political-science/"> Coburn claims is not necessary</a>&#8230;since people can learn all that  	they need to know about politics from <strong>CABLE NEWS</strong>.  It&#8217;s suddenly  	quite obvious where <strong>HE</strong> learned most of what <strong>HE</strong> knows  	about it&#8230;</li>
<li>It&#8217;s an established fact that Republicans have had some difficulty  	adjusting to the &#8220;<em>internet age</em>&#8220;&#8230;perhaps best displayed by the fact  	that most of them don&#8217;t seem to realize that if they say something that  	directly contradicts what they said one year ago, the clip of both  	statements will be on <em>YouTube</em> before the day is out.  Want to  	see a slideshow of the &#8220;<em>Top Nine Republican Internet Fails</em>?&#8221;  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/republican-internet-fails_n_319574.html"> Here you go</a>&#8230;</li>
<li>The number one problem with allying oneself with a minority of loud,  	activist, ignorant, and unreasonable people&#8230;is that you suddenly lose the  	support of the much larger body of normal, moderate, sane folks.  Want  	to see what happens if you try to win the moderate people back by behaving  	like a reasonable human being, open to compromise and the good ideas of  	others?  Watch here as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) finds out what  	happens when the lunatics figure out that you are not really one of them:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YP7nCyqMTsE&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP7nCyqMTsE</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Liz Cheney is not quite done fighting her father&#8217;s battles&#8230;no matter  	how many times she appears on discussion panels and is identified as having  	the foreign policy knowledge of a teenager.  Now 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28212.html">she has  	formed</a> the &#8220;<em>Keep America Safe</em>&#8221; organization, whose mission  	statement claims to support &#8220;<strong>an unapologetic approach to fighting  	terrorism around the world, for victory in the wars this country fights, for  	democracy and human rights, and for a strong American military that is  	needed in the dangerous world in which we live.</strong>&#8220;  Ms.  	Cheney&#8230;first of all, even if we look only at the fact that planes have not  	crashed into buildings this year, President Obama <strong>ALREADY</strong> has a  	better track record than your father had, in terms of keeping the country  	safe.  Secondly, Obama has succeeded in gaining international allies  	in the struggle against terrorists&#8230;allies that your father helped to  	alienate.  And third, well, I think the DNC put it best in their  	response: &#8220;<strong>Last fall, the American people overwhelmingly rejected a  	radical foreign policy authored by Dick Cheney that alienated our allies,  	emboldened our enemies, depleted our resources, distracted our focus and  	made the nation less secure. The Cheneys lost that debate and their approach  	was deemed a failure. The Cheneys can continue to focus on securing their  	sullied legacy if they want to. But, the President will continue to focus on  	securing the country.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Exactly</em>.</li>
<li>Retaining his crown as &#8220;<em>King of the Bizarre Analogy</em>,&#8221; RNC  	Chariman Michael Steele 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/michael-steele-cow-on-the_n_321121.html"> said in a recent FOX interview</a> that he feels like&#8230;well&#8230;health care  	reform is a &#8220;<strong>train</strong>,&#8221; and President Obama is the conductor, and Obama  	is trying to get all the Republicans to get on board, and Steele sees  	himself as a &#8220;<strong>cow on the tracks.</strong>&#8220;  <em>Ok, sure.</em></li>
<li>I mentioned in a previous post, one way that you know that the GOP is  	focused on simply <strong>OPPOSING EVERYTHING</strong> is when a number of GOP  	legislators vote against Senator Franken&#8217;s first bill:  a bill <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> protecting rape victims</span>, working for companies with government  	contracts.  Here&#8217;s Jon Stewart, who points out what should be an  	obvious truth: &#8220;<strong>If, to protect Halliburton, you have to side against rape  	victims, you might want to rethink your allegiances.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:252468" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>It recently came to light, in part because of the work done by the  	National Women&#8217;s Law Center, that in eight states, insurance companies can  	and do consider being the victim of spousal abuse a &#8220;<em>pre-existing  	condition</em>&#8221; that allows them to deny coverage.  State and  	Federal representatives from most of the eight states expressed immediate  	embarrassment and outrage over the situation, and most have already taken  	steps to remedy the matter. <strong>But not Senator Richard Burr (R-N.C.)</strong>.   	When the president of the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, Marcia Greenberger, 	<a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_10_15/2009_10_15.html"> appeared before a Senate committee</a> to discuss the issue, Burr thought it  	appropriate to repeatedly interrupt and otherwise disrespect her:</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>:  If I could  get back to your question about the specific examples: they manifest themselves  in many different ways. For example, if a woman ends up in an emergency room  with cuts, bruises, broken arms, black eyes, typical injuries that result from  domestic violence, we know of instances where women are being denied insurance  coverage and neither the insurance company&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: My question&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;doesn&#8217;t view  that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;is specifically about  North Carolina&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: &#8230;and I&#8217;m trying  to answer that&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;and the insurance  commissioner tells me we haven&#8217;t had a case. We haven&#8217;t had anybody&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: Well, I&#8217;m trying  to explain. First, I think it&#8217;s great that he is now explicitly having a rule,  which as our report pointed out, didn&#8217;t exist before. So that&#8217;s really  excellent, because of the way insurance companies deal with this issue in  particular. They will often deny the coverage of victims and survivors of  domestic violence without saying that that&#8217;s the reason&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: &#8230;I&#8217;m just going by  your report&#8230;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Greenberger</em>: You asked the  question about did we follow up and we did. </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong><em>Burr</em>: Well, I found more  information in my one call to North Carolina than I think your report did. </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Again?</em> Representative Bill Otto (R-Kansas) has obviously  	not been paying attention.  First he 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/redneck-rap-bill-otto-gop_n_323176.html"> puts a video</a> on YouTube titled &#8220;<em>Redneck Rap</em>&#8221; where he raps (<em>and  	badly</em>) his various criticisms of President Obama, and about eating  	opossum, which he calls &#8220;<strong>the other dark meat.</strong>&#8220;  This obviously  	drew allegations of racism (<em>at a minimum it is childish, insensitive, and  	inane</em>), and eventually the clip was removed from the site.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/bill-otto-says-he-will-re_n_323686.html"> And now</a>&#8230;Otto says he&#8217;s going to repost the video, because it was his  	adult daughters who took the video down, and also because he fears that &#8220;<strong>People  	are going to think that this was done by people to shut me up.  I&#8217;m  	getting hate e-mails from Maryland to California, but, hey, that&#8217;s part of  	the game.</strong>&#8220;  Mr. Otto:  It&#8217;s not a <em>game</em>, it&#8217;s civil  	service and <strong>YOU</strong> are an elected official, <em>jackass</em>.  Next  	time, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">listen to your daughters</span>&#8230;and try to learn from the lessons of  	other, like the <strong>OTHER</strong> Kansas legislator who just recently got in a  	heap of trouble 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0809/Kansas_Rep_GOP_needs_great_white_hope.html"> for saying</a> that the GOP is looking for a &#8220;<strong>great white hope</strong>&#8221; to  	defeat Obama.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA -- PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Want the &#8220;<em>short version</em>&#8221; of the merry war between the White House  	and <em>FOX News</em>?  Here goes&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>WHITE HOUSE:</strong></span> FOX News <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/11/anita-dunn-fox-news-an-ou_n_316691.html"> serves as the propaganda arm</a> of the Republican Party.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BILL O&#8217;REILLY:</strong></span> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bill-oreilly-glenn-beck-d_n_318085.html"> Nuh uh</a>&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA MATTERS:</strong></span> Umm&#8230;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/fox_news_channel?tab=all">it&#8217;s  pretty obvious</a>, guys&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GLENN BECK:</strong></span> The administration is like the Nazis&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/glenn-beck-compares-fox-n_n_318784.html">and  we&#8217;re the Jews</a>!</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NEW STUDY:</strong></span> Not only is it true, but we found something  interesting:  Most of the anti-Obama forces aren&#8217;t particularly  racist&#8230;the only thing they have in common is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/16/gop-base-driven-by-bizarr_n_323796.html"> they all watch FOX News</a>, and because of this&#8230;<em>they believe some pretty  outlandish sh-t.</em></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s fun picking on CNN&#8217;s inability to both perform research and report  	news.  It&#8217;s especially fun&#8230;if you&#8217;re Jon Stewart of <em>The Daily Show</em>:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:251763" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember the rather bizarre reactions from some members of the media  	when Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize?  Well, Rachel Maddow thinks it  	can all be explained by &#8220;<em>Obama Derangement Syndrome:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMJuEOaF84o&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o">www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>By now you&#8217;ve heard that the Senate Finance Committee managed to pass  	the &#8220;<em>Baucus Bill.</em>&#8220;  You also heard that Republican Olympia Snowe  	(R-Maine) voted along with the Democrats to send the bill on.  And  	recently, 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33308113/ns/politics-health_care_reform/"> it may have come to your attention</a> that another Maine Republican,  	Senator Susan Collins, may also lend her support for the bill.  Well, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/exclusive-moveon-whacks-f_n_318640.html"> MoveOn.org</a>, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal  	Employees, the AFL-CIO, and the Communications Workers of America would like  	to remind you:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/senate-health-bill-oppose_n_318920.html"> it&#8217;s a CRAPPY bill</a>, that would make a mountain of money for the  	insurance companies, would change little in the way they do business, and  	would <strong>NOT</strong> serve to get all of America&#8217;s uninsured the health care coverage  	that they need.  In fact&#8230;any <strong>OTHER</strong> House and Senate version  	might just be a better choice.</li>
<li><strong><em>Thank you, Captain Obvious:</em></strong> The most ridiculously  	unnecessary headline in health care reform news 	<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/13/AR2009101303472.html">comes courtesy</a> of <em>The Washington  	Post</em>:  &#8220;<strong>Health Insurers Emerge as Obama&#8217;s Top Foe in Reform  	Effort.</strong>&#8221; That&#8217;s right&#8230;.&#8221;<em>emerging</em>&#8220;&#8230;as if it weren&#8217;t  	always the case.</li>
<li>Think only our elected officials are in the pocket of the health  	insurance industry&#8230;but our stalwart media will be there to keep us  	informed of the truth regarding the health care debate.  <em>Maybe not.</em> CNN contributor, Alex Castellanos&#8230;has been 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140037">revealed</a> to be  	connected at the hip with America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (<em>AHIP</em>),  	the monolithic insurance lobby currently (<em>and ferociously</em>)  	campaigning to kill reform legislation.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t generally hear about &#8220;<em>progressive faith groups</em>,&#8221; but  	the <em>American Values Network</em> aims to change that.  They are 	<a href="http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/healthcare/faces-ad/">currently  	releasing ads</a>&#8230;emphasizing the moral and religious arguments supporting  	heath care reform.  It&#8217;s not a difficult argument to make, and  	represents one of the best examples of &#8220;<em>fighting fire with fire</em>&#8221; that  	we have seen in a long time.</li>
<li>Is it obvious that former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has a new  	book out?  Not only has he been making the usual talk show rounds, but  	he also managed to inject a little sanity into the health care debate.   	Of right-wing assertions that the Obama plan represents &#8220;<em>socialized  	medicine</em>&#8221; and warrants comparisons to Britain, Canada, and France, Frist 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3tLHqGz7uE&amp;feature=player_embedded"> said on C-SPAN</a>, &#8220;<strong>What the Obama administration is doing is not  	socialized medicine.  Socialized medicine is where the government owns  	the hospitals, owns the doctors, and decides how people get paid.</strong>&#8220;   	Yes&#8230;thank you&#8230;<em>finally</em>&#8230;is everybody listening?</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>In Lakeville, Massachusetts, someone 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/10/13/swastika-obama-carved-int_ws_319331.html"> carved a swastika</a> and the word &#8220;<strong>Obama</strong>&#8221; into a golf course green.   	The course manager believes that someone used either a cleated golf shoe  	or some other tool to perform the vandalism.  Strange&#8230;one would certainly think  	that America&#8217;s golfers have had some extra time to get used to the idea of  	having a very popular, half African-American leader.</li>
<li><em><strong>NEW HERO:</strong></em> Dylan Ratigan hosts the &#8220;<em>Morning Meeting</em>&#8221;  	show on MSNBC, and lately has shown to be a tough, bright host&#8230;who knows  	how to play hardball.  In 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/14/dylan-ratigan-to-chamber_n_320397.html"> a recent interview</a> with Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S.  	Chamber of Commerce, Ratigan responded to Donohue&#8217;s attempts to claim that  	free, unfettered enterprise has the solutions to all problems by saying, &#8220;<strong>unless  	the government and people like you that lobby to the exemptions that allow  	banks to [speculate with taxpayer money] get out of the way, we will never  	have fair play again in this country and we&#8217;ll have job creation by virtue  	of taxpayer theft, which is ultimately destructive, and I would argue,  	treasonous to this country.</strong>&#8220;  When Donohue complained that, in  	essence, it&#8217;s harder to spread economic propaganda when the host asks hard  	questions, Ratigan responded, &#8220;<strong>Yes, it is.  Especially when you talk  	nonsense.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li><em><strong>Oh no they didn&#8217;t:</strong></em> The White House decided to take a  	play out of the &#8220;<em>Sarah Palin Media Strategy</em>&#8221; book, when confronted  	with the mounting criticism in the blogosphere regarding the  	administration&#8217;s failure to achieve civil rights goals for gay citizens.   	NBC White House Correspondent John Harwood 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/bloggers-furious-at-white_n_317424.html"> reported</a>, &#8220;<strong>For a sign of how seriously the White House does or  	doesn&#8217;t take this opposition, one adviser told me today those bloggers need  	to take off their pajamas, get dressed and realize that governing a  	closely-divided country is complicated and difficult.</strong>&#8220;  <em> Caaaarefullll</em>.  Remember the role bloggers played getting Obama <em> into</em> the White House?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>UPDATE:</strong></span> The White House 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/white-house-disavows-claim-that-gay-critics-bloggers-are-part-of-internet-left-fringe/"> would like to disavow those comments</a>&#8230;never happened&#8230;nothing to see  	here.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now what could we possibly add to all that?  As CNN would say, we&#8217;ll &#8220;<em>leave  it there</em>&#8221; for now&#8230;and see you back here on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-waterboarding-possum-golfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory:  Grayson&#8217;s Charge, Sex Clinics, and the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Behar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shepard Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the weekly "Chaos Theory" edition of the RLF blog...where I quickly attempt to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been an eventful week in many arenas, and so it is now time for the  weekly &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition of the RLF blog&#8230;where I quickly attempt  to get caught up on all the other strange political news items, leftover for the  week.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s get started&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE HEALTH CARE CARNIVAL OF DESPAIR:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Most people hadn&#8217;t heard of Representative Alan Grayson (R-FL)  	before&#8230;but they have <span style="text-decoration: underline;">now</span>.  In a wonderful, congressional, &#8220;<em>oh,  	no you didn&#8217;t</em>&#8221; moment&#8230;Grayson laid out in simple terms the terrible  	truth about the Republicans on Health Care Reform:  tens of thousands  	of Americans are dying because they don&#8217;t have insurance&#8230;and the  	Republicans have offered <strong>NOTHING</strong> but opposition to changing  	this&#8230;therefore, they must just want people to just &#8220;<em>not get sick</em>&#8221;  	and if they do&#8230;they should &#8220;<em>die quickly:</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-usmvYOPfco&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco">www.youtube.com/watch?v=-usmvYOPfco</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course, the Republican backlash to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/alan-grayson-republicans_n_303996.html"> Grayson&#8217;s statements</a> was fast and furious, and they demanded an  	immediate apology, comparing what Grayson did to the actions of Senator Joe  	&#8220;<em>You Lie!</em>&#8221; Wilson&#8230;despite the fact that the two events have nothing  	in common, especially in terms of congressional procedures and policies  	regarding decorum.  Grayson&#8230;complied, <em>but not in the way the GOP  	expected</em>:  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/grayson-not-backing-down_n_305196.html"> he apologized</a>, not to the GOP, but to the dead and the dying and to  	their families&#8230;he apologized for Congress allowing this to happen.   	So far, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/pelosi-grayson-shouldnt-a_n_306338.html"> Pelosi has backed Grayson</a>, along with the rest of the Democrats&#8230;and  	now some 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/dems-taunt-gop-wheres-you_n_307560.html"> Democrats seem to be realizing</a>: &#8220;<em>Wait a minute&#8230;the GOP really <strong> HAVEN&#8217;T</strong> offered a plan&#8230;we should point that out!</em>&#8220;  No kidding  	guys&#8230;that one was a gimme.</li>
<li>Want the very definition of &#8220;<em>out of touch?</em>&#8220;  House Minority  	Leader John Boehner (R-OH)&#8230;<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1009/Boehner_searching_for_first_public_option_backer.html?showall">says  	nobody has ever approached him</a> supporting the public option and he  	therefore doesn&#8217;t think most people support it.  Ummm, John&#8230;the  	majority of people in <strong>YOUR STATE</strong> support it&#8230;the <strong>VAST</strong> majority of the 	<a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693"> people in the country</a> support it and 	<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-HealthcareReform/idUSTRE58T0MY20090930"> would be willing to pay higher taxes to pay for it</a>&#8230;and unless you,  	Snowe, and some of the Democratic Senators who voted against it in the  	Senate Finance Committee realize that the majority of your constituents want  	it&#8230;well, there will be obvious political consequences come reelection  	time.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator David Vitter (R-LA) 	<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/60699-prostitution-complaint-filed-against-vitter"> has some new problems</a>&#8230;stemming from his old problems.  It&#8217;s been  	very odd to watch a Senator, busted for soliciting prostitutes, question the  	morality of Democrats and claim that he and other southern Republicans are  	the ones representing &#8220;<strong>true values.</strong>&#8220;  Perhaps he mistakenly  	believed that the scandal was behind him&#8230;well, &#8220;<em>not so</em>&#8221; says the  	Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel.  Apparently (<em>who knew?</em>),  	soliciting prostitutes just might violate the State&#8217;s laws regarding  	professional misconduct for a lawyer.  The law states that lawyers may  	be charged with misconduct and subsequently disbarred if they &#8220;<strong>commit a  	criminal act especially one that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty,  	trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.</strong>&#8220;  Ooops.</li>
<li>The Health Care bill contains a provision for health clinics to be  	established in schools, since studies show that access to health services  	can greatly increase academic performance.  This gave Representative  	Michele Bachmann (R-MN) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/bachmann-sex-clinics-will_n_306292.html"> all that she needed</a> to formulate a new &#8220;<em>anti-reform</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theory.  Bachmann tells us&#8230;that these would actually be &#8220;<strong>sex  	clinics</strong>&#8221; where kids could go to get <strong>ABORTIONS</strong> without their  	parents knowing about it: &#8220;<strong>The bill goes on to say what&#8217;s going to go on  	-- comprehensive primary health services, physicals, treatment of minor  	acute medical conditions, referrals to follow-up for specialty care &#8212; is  	that abortion? Does that mean that someone&#8217;s 13 year-old daughter could walk  	into a sex clinic, have a pregnancy test done, be taken away to the local  	Planned Parenthood abortion clinic, have their abortion, be back and go home  	on the school bus that night? Mom and dad are never the wiser.</strong>&#8220;  Of  	course&#8230;Michelle only read item (II) under section 2511 of the bill&#8230;if  	she had bothered to read item (I) RIGHT BEFORE IT she would have known that  	the bills says: &#8220;<strong>SBHC services will be provides in accordance with  	Federal, State, and local laws governing-- (I) obtaining parental or  	guardian consent; and (II) patient privacy and student records, including  	section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of  	1996 and section 444 of the General Education Provision Act;</strong>&#8220;  Your  	choice: bad reader&#8230;or just a liar?</li>
<li>Governor Sanford of South Carolina&#8230;having been asked by both his  	fellow Republicans and his constituents to resign over his actions regarding  	the abandonment of his duties to pursue an illicit affair&#8230;<a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/965644.html">now  	asks that the state ethics panel doesn&#8217;t release its findings</a>.  <em> I wonder why</em>.  Hear that sound?  It&#8217;s the sound of Sanford&#8217;s  	fingernails dragging across the State of South Carolina&#8230;clinging on like  	grim death so that he can stay in office <em>for just a little bit longer</em>.</li>
<li>The &#8220;<em>Republican</em>&#8221; brand name?  	<a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/assessing_the_gop_brand.php">Not  	doing so hot</a>&#8230;and given the types of things I&#8217;m reading and posting  	each week, this should surprise <strong>NO ONE</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE MEDIA:  PUNDITS, HACKS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>FOX&#8217;s Sean Hannity is so consistently wrong in terms of his facts and  	historical data, that Jon Stewart was able to dedicate almost a third of one 	<em>Daily Show</em> episode&#8230;just to pointing out Hannity&#8217;s <strong>RECENT</strong> mistakes.  I submit this clip for your enjoyment and edification:</li>
</ul>
<p><object style="display:block" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="display:block" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:250791" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Bernard Goldberg, a media critic, usually appears on FOX shows&#8230;to <strong> DEFEND</strong> the network against the constant stream of accusations that they  	have an obvious, right-wing bias.  So&#8230;you can imagine that people  	were a bit shocked to see him appearing on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor, and  	saying&#8230;that in many ways, FOX is to be held responsible for creating this  	perception, especially when it does things like &#8220;<em>promoting</em>&#8221; Tea Party  	protests rather than simply &#8220;<em>reporting on</em>&#8221; Tea Party protests:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ztDUgCqXSc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztDUgCqXSc</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Once again, Shepard Smith, host of FOX&#8217;s &#8220;<em>The Fox Report</em>&#8221; has  	chosen to speak the truth rather than simply parrot the talking points.   	On a recent segment, a guest tried to levy criticisms at the current Health  	Care Reform proposals&#8230;by pointing out that Canada&#8217;s single-payer system is  	less than perfect.  Shepard is quick to point out that it seems like a  	false and deceptive comparison, since <strong>NONE</strong> of the bills in Congress  	propose a single-payer system.  When Shepard&#8217;s guest then tries to  	create a classic &#8220;<em>straw man</em>&#8220;/&#8221;<em>slippery slope</em>&#8221; argument&#8230;Shepard  	wasn&#8217;t going to allow that either.  <strong>Good for you Shep:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jzr7Nnxjlfs&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzr7Nnxjlfs</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/sen-graham-calls-beck-a-c_n_306434.html"> at a recent discussion</a> in front of powerful Washington &#8220;<em>movers and  	shakers,</em>&#8221; came right out and said that the &#8220;<em>birther</em>&#8221; conspiracy  	theorists are &#8220;<strong>crazy</strong>,&#8221; that Obama is certainly not a &#8220;<em>closet  	Muslim</em>,&#8221; and that Glenn Beck &#8220;<strong>is not aligned with any party. He is  	aligned with cynicism and there has always been a market for cynics. But we  	became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a  	great nation because we are a nation of believers.</strong>&#8220;  Wow&#8230;could  	there finally be a Republican who might realize that the votes you get from  	siding with the extremists&#8230;<strong>ARE NOT WORTH IT</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>THE OLYMPIC FLAME&#8230;FIZZLES:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Even after President Obama flew to Denmark to make the case for the 2016  	Summer Olympics to be held in Chicago&#8230;<a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/33138973/ns/sports-olympic_sports/">the  	prize went to someone else</a>.  In a shocking turn of events, Chicago  	didn&#8217;t even make it past the first round of voting&#8230;Tokyo would fall in the  	next round&#8230;and at the end Rio de Janeiro won over Madrid the right to host  	the games.</li>
<li>In a display that can only be described as exceedingly puerile,  	conservative commentators/columnists including RedState&#8217;s Erick Erickson,  	Michelle Malkin, and Rush Limbaugh have been, quite literally, <strong> CELEBRATING</strong> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/conservatives-revel-in-ob_n_307794.html"> the fact that America will not be hosting the 2016 games</a>&#8230;simply  	because it allows them to claim that &#8220;<em>Obama failed at something.</em>&#8220;  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">That&#8217;s right:</span> Conservatives are <strong>CELEBRATING</strong>, during an  	economic crisis, that America will <strong>NOT</strong> get the projected $22 billion  	in revenues, the 315,000 new jobs, and the $11 billion in new income that  	those jobs represent.  They&#8217;re willing to cheer against the best  	interests of the country&#8230;if it means a &#8220;<em>failure</em>&#8221; for the President.   	Remember this, when listening to these same people discuss Health Care  	Reform, or anything else:  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">these people would rather America suffers</span>&#8230;as  	long as it denies Obama check in the &#8220;<em>win</em>&#8221; column.</li>
<li>While the President was unable to convince the voting members of the IOC  	to permit the games to be held in America&#8230;top White House Advisor David  	Axlerod is correct at saying 	<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/02/axelrod-blames-chicago-loss-on-ioc-politics/"> there is more involved</a> than the President&#8217;s charm.  It&#8217;s a well  	established fact that the IOC is an extremely political body, and that its  	voting process often produces unexpected results.  In recent years, the  	IOC has come under increasing pressure to allow the games to be hosted in a  	country <strong>OTHER</strong> than the United States, the nations of Europe, and the  	countries comprising Asia&#8230;and preferably a South American country.   	Given this pressure, the decision to hand the honor over to Rio de Janeiro,  	Brazil&#8230;<em>starts to make more sense</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PALINWATCH -- HOW CAN WE MISS HER IF SHE WON&#8217;T GO AWAY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Politico&#8217;s recent polls suggest that ex-Governor Sarah Palin 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/palinmap/index.html">is not well regarded  	among her fellow Republicans</a>, Republican advisors 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/mccain-campaign-manager-p_n_307523.html"> consider her to be</a> &#8220;<em>electoral poison</em>,&#8221; and many of her former  	supporters either tired of her during the Levy/Bristol business, or don&#8217;t  	respect her resigning the governorship before completing her term&#8230;but 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26236.html">there is  	still a demographic</a> that absolutely <strong>LOVES</strong> her:  Evangelical  	Christians, and Republicans living in small, country towns&#8230;and of course, 	<strong>there&#8217;s some overlap between those two groups</strong>.  I don&#8217;t think I  	even need to say anything else on the subject&#8230;draw your own conclusions.</li>
<li>The New York Post reports that Palin&#8217;s new career as a &#8220;<em>highly paid  	speaker</em>&#8221; 	<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/sarah_lectures_tough_sell_Z6eKRnldUitBmiOfXCBjlI"> is not going so hot</a>&#8230;perhaps due to the limited number of people (<em>mentioned  	in the previous item</em>) who still think she&#8217;s &#8220;<em>bright</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>adorable</em>.&#8221;   	In fact, one industry expert told the Post: &#8220;<strong>The big lecture buyers in  	the US are paralyzed with fear about booking her, basically because they  	think she is a blithering idiot&#8230;Palin is so uninteresting to so many  	groups -- unless they are interested in moose hunting.  What does she  	have to say? She can&#8217;t even describe what she reads.</strong>&#8220;  And as with  	the previous item&#8230;I really can&#8217;t think of anything that I need to add to  	that.</li>
<li>In a surprise move&#8230;perhaps due to her inability to book speaking gigs  	at $100,000 a pop&#8230;it was announced that 	<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090928/ap_on_en_ot/us_books_palin"> Palin&#8217;s memoir would be released</a> November 17, which is four months ahead  	of schedule.  The announcement regarding the book&#8217;s title generated  	even more surprised looks: &#8220;<strong>Going Rogue -- An American Life.</strong>&#8220;  It  	seemed strange to some&#8230;that Palin would want to reference &#8220;<em>going rogue</em>,&#8221;  	as it was a comment that McCain campaign insiders made referring to how  	Palin&#8217;s off-book, off-message, inconsistent, and completely unprepared  	remarks were <strong>TANKING MCCAIN&#8217;S PRESIDENTIAL BID</strong>.  In other  	words&#8230;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">it wasn&#8217;t meant as a compliment</span>.  Pre-orders for the  	book 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/2009/09/30/palin-already-a-bestselle_0_ws_304937.html"> suggest very brisk sales</a>, causing some on the left to ascribe to a  	conspiracy theory that conservative groups and churches must be buying up  	the books in large numbers to increase the sales figures.  In  	reality&#8230;people just need to realize that not everybody who buys the book  	necessarily admires Sarah Palin&#8230;many will get it just for the likely  	entertainment value, the same way millions of people each day go out on  	YouTube and watch people ride bicycles into walls, fall off skateboards, and  	slip and fall while dancing.</li>
<li>Want a good laugh?  Here&#8217;s Ann Coulter, appearing on Joy Behar&#8217;s  	new show on CNN&#8230;asserting that the effect of Sarah Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>death panel</strong>&#8221;  	tweet shows that Palin is &#8220;<strong>a powerful woman</strong>&#8221; and that people listen  	to her because she is so &#8220;<strong>coherent</strong>.&#8221; Joy&#8230;took particular exception  	to the &#8220;<em>coherent</em>&#8221; part.  Many more excepts may be viewed 	<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxdq9PUQtTg">here</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mBoP08KPHUc&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc">www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBoP08KPHUc</a></p></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Remember Valerie Plame?  The undercover CIA agent whose identity  	was leaked to the press after her husband criticized the Bush  	administration?  Remember the Bush administration agreeing to &#8220;chat&#8221;  	with investigators, but not on the record or under oath&#8230;and how Scooter  	Libby was eventually &#8220;<em>volunteered</em>&#8221; to take the fall for leaking the  	information, despite the fact that conventional wisdom suggested it was Vice  	President Cheney&#8217;s idea?  Thursday, a federal judge, against the wishes  	of both the Bush and Obama administrations, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/cheney-fbi-interview-must_n_306329.html"> ruled that the FBI&#8217;s notes of their interview</a> with Cheney must be  	publicly released.  This could be embarrassing&#8230;on the upside, if  	Cheney&#8217;s statements are embarrassing/incriminating enough, maybe he&#8217;ll  	finally stop appearing on talk shows.  <em>Fingers crossed&#8230;</em></li>
<li>Just last week, I was criticizing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for  	not being assertive enough, in terms of getting Senate Democrats to do  	what&#8217;s right and not &#8220;<em>what&#8217;s best for insurance companies.</em>&#8220;   	Apparently, Reid <strong>HAS</strong> grown enough of a backbone to send letters to  	President Obama and Secretary of Defense Gates&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/01/reid-appeals-directly-to_n_305784.html">asking  	them to finally step up</a> and lend their support to the fight to repeal  	the military&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell</strong>&#8221; policy, which is causing  	highly trained interpreters, war heroes, technical experts, and other brave  	soldiers/sailors/airmen, to be discharged from the armed services&#8230;just for  	being gay.  Reid wrote, &#8220;<strong>As Congress considers future legislative  	action, we believe it would be helpful to hear your views on the policy,&#8221; he  	writes. &#8220;Your leadership in this matter is greatly appreciated and needed at  	this time</strong>,&#8221; and then goes on to include stories of highly valuable and  	distinguished soldiers being discharged under the policy.  Obama has  	voiced his opposition to both DADT and DOMA (<em>The Defense of Marriage Act</em>)&#8230;but  	so far his administration has done more to squelch challenges to the various  	anti-gay rights policies and laws, than it has done to repeal them.  At  	a minimum, they should be lending their support to Senator Kirsten  	Gillibrand (D-NY), who has been fighting the good fight in the Senate.</li>
<li>Turns out that the Secret Service&#8217;s 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33120229">investigation of the Facebook  	user</a> who created a poll asking if the President &#8220;<strong>should be killed</strong>,&#8221;  	has identified a juvenile as the perpetrator.  No charges will be  	filed&#8230;but many are missing the obvious topic for discussion:  while  	the poll may not have represented a viable threat to the President, doesn&#8217;t  	it say something when the tone of our national discourse has become <strong>SO</strong> irrational, <strong>SO</strong> violent, <strong>SO</strong> hateful&#8230;that a child asks such a  	terrible question?  Glenn, Michelle, Rush, Sean, Ann, Bill, and  	others&#8230;<em>won&#8217;t you please think of the children?</em></li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s all from the Reality Liberation Front for this week -- have a good  weekend, and we&#8217;ll see you on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-grayson-clinics-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Controversy Controversies: Sotomayor, Gates, and Birthers</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/non-controversy-controversies-sotomayor-gates-and-birthers/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/non-controversy-controversies-sotomayor-gates-and-birthers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Maher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Louis Gates Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative McCotter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricci Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergeant James Crowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that despite national crises ranging from the economy, to health care, and to numerous military fronts abroad...the GOP has little to offer us except "non-controversy controversies."  The saying in Washington seems to have always been, "If you can't beat their ideas, and you don't have the votes to stop their ideas...deflect, distract, and disrupt."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that despite national crises ranging from the economy, to health  care, and to numerous military fronts abroad&#8230;the GOP has little to offer us  except &#8220;<em>non-controversy controversies.</em>&#8220;  It&#8217;s part of an common  political practice and is not limited in its use to Republican interests.   In fact the Democrats have used this tactic many times in the past, when their  party was similarly devoid of practical ideas and sensible members.  The  saying in Washington seems to have always been, &#8220;<em>If you can&#8217;t beat their  ideas, and you don&#8217;t have the votes to stop their ideas&#8230;<strong>deflect, distract,  and disrupt.</strong></em>&#8220;  Oh yes, I have three matching examples:</p>
<p><strong>DEFLECT -- The Sonia Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>From the beginning, it was nearly a foregone conclusion&#8230;even the  	Republicans commented that Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s confirmation was going to  	happen.  And now it has: by a vote 13 to 6, Sotomayor 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/28/sotomayor-confirmed-by-se_n_246262.html"> has been confirmed</a> by the Senate Judiciary Committee as the first  	Hispanic Supreme Court Justice.  You only get one guess who the 6 &#8220;<em>no</em>&#8221;  	votes were.  Despite having the most extensive and impressive judicial  	record of any Supreme Court nominee in recent history, and despite having a  	record which shows little or no judicial activism, and despite a record that  	is as close to &#8220;<em>bias-free</em>&#8221; as we are likely to see, and despite  	having fewer cases reviewed and fewer cases overturned than almost every  	current Supreme Court Justice&#8230;Senate Republicans have tried to deflect  	attention away from other issues by turning the confirmation hearings into a 	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">circus</span> replete with accusations of activism, racism, and liberalism.</li>
<li>Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), ranking Republican senator on the  	committee&#8230;<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-07-27-sessions_N.htm">voted  	against Sotomayor</a>.  Why would a man, who failed his own  	confirmation hearing due to a history of racist statements and actions,  	condemn Sotomayor?  Sessions said, &#8220;<strong>I don&#8217;t believe that Judge  	Sotomayor has the deep-rooted convictions necessary to resist the siren call  	of judicial activism.  She has evoked its mantra too often</strong>.&#8221; In  	other words, despite a long record of faithfully upholding precedent, and  	her statements that she will continue to uphold precedent&#8230;Sessions just  	doesn&#8217;t believe her, despite there being <strong>NO</strong> evidence to support his  	conclusions.  All I can say is, Jeff&#8230;is a good thing Sotomayor  	doesn&#8217;t make decisions the way that you obviously do.</li>
<li>Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA)&#8230;also 	<a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090727/NEWS/90727043"> voted against Sotomayor</a>.  Grassley said, &#8220;<strong>It seems to me answers  	to the questions she gave us about that don&#8217;t comport with what she actually  	said or adequate explanation overcoming doubts about her statements,</strong>&#8221;  	and added that he is concerned about her understanding of the functions of  	Congress and the Supreme Court as well as the Separation of Powers.  In  	other words&#8230;he doesn&#8217;t really even <strong>HAVE</strong> a reason beyond vaguely &#8220;<em>not  	liking her answers&#8221;</em>&#8230;and he is willing to ignore Sotomayor&#8217;s  	established tendency to follow precedent and rule according to the standing  	law of the land.</li>
<li>Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ)&#8230;<a href="http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/07/22/kyl-will-vote-aginst-sotomayor/">voted  	against Sotomayor</a>.  Kyl&#8217;s reasoning was even more inane than  	Grassley&#8217;s: &#8220;<strong><span>I did not make my decision quickly.  	But when we finished the session in which she failed to answer my questions  	regarding the Ricci case, I knew then she had a very big burden to overcome,  	because she had just blown it as far as I was concerned.</span></strong>&#8220;   	So&#8230;because he didn&#8217;t like her answers on one topic, concerning one case,  	and arguably a very hard case (details regarding the complex issues involved  	in the case <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_v._DeStefano">can be  	found here</a>), and a case where she ruled in favor of following precedent  	(<em>the Supreme Court&#8217;s overturning of her verdict is a clear example of  	judicial activism</em>)&#8230;he&#8217;s going to vote against her.  Jon&#8230;it&#8217;s  	called &#8220;<em>looking for any excuse</em>&#8221; and it&#8217;s petty politics at its worst.</li>
<li>In fact, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/gop-sen-graham-to-support_n_242875.html"> the only Republican</a> to vote <strong>FOR</strong> Sotomayor&#8230;was Senator Lindsey  	Graham (R-SC).  Why?  He said she&#8217;s well-qualified&#8230;with a  	mainstream record&#8230;has shown she can avoid bias&#8230;and that &#8220;<strong>Her life  	story &#8230; is something that every American should be proud of, and if her  	selection to the Supreme Court will inspire young women, particularly Latino  	women, to seek a career in the law, then that is a good thing -- and I hope  	it will.</strong>&#8220;  That almost redeems him for some of the <strong>BIZARRE</strong> questions he asked her during the hearings&#8230;and of all the Republican  	senators mentioned, his comments&#8230;match up best with the <strong>ACTUAL RECORD</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>DISTRACT -- The Gates Arrest:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>In a classic example of &#8220;<em>distraction</em>,&#8221; Republicans have decided  	to vociferously condemn President Obama&#8217;s statement from his recent press  	conference, where he said the police officers who arrested Harvard Professor  	Henry Louis Gates Jr. behaved &#8220;<strong>stupidly</strong>.&#8221;  How much has the GOP  	chosen to overplay this hand?  Representative Thaddeus McCotter,  	(R-MI.) 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/gop-rep-will-offer-resolu_n_245287.html"> has put forth a House Resolution</a>, calling for President Obama to  	apologize to Cambridge Police Sergeant James Crowley, the officer who  	performed Gates&#8217; arrest.  <em>Really&#8230;</em>?  Michigan is currently  	suffering <span style="text-decoration: underline;">15% unemployment</span>, and McCotter thinks his time is best  	spent offering up resolutions calling for apologies?  This,  	Representative McCotter, is the number one reason why you guys don&#8217;t get  	re-elected.  The resolution reads:
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;">&#8220;<strong>Whereas on July 16, 2009,  	Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley responded to a 911  	call from a neighbor of Harvard University Professor Henry Louis (&#8220;Skip&#8221;)  	Gates, Jr. about a suspected break-in in progress at his residence, which  	had been broken into on a prior occasion; </strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Whereas on July 22, 2009,  	in responding to a question during a White House press conference President  	Barack Obama stated: &#8220;Skip Gates is a friend, so I may be a little biased  	here. I don&#8217;t know all of the facts involved in this local police response  	incident&#8221;; </strong></p>
<div><strong> <script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
    E.onAvailable('footer', 
function(e)
{
	ad_spec = {
	"zone_info": "huffpost.politics/longpost;daily-brief=1;featured-posts=1;politics=1;reporting=1;sam-stein=1;entry_id=245287;@huffpolitics=1;@ypolitics=1;@yus-news=1;obama-cops=1;obama-gates=1;obama-police-apology=1;thaddeus-mccotter=1;thaddeus-mccotter-apology=1;thaddeus-mccotter-obama=1;thaddeus-mccotter-resolution=1",
	"ord": 1248810337,
	"tile": 3,
	"width": 300,
	"height": 250,
	"el_id": "ad_300_250_inline",
	"class_name": "ad_block ad_wide",
	"type": "iframe"
	}
	HuffPoUtil.WEDGJE.write(ad_spec,"ad_advertisement");
});
// ]]&gt;</script> </strong></div>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Whereas President Obama  	proceeded to state Sergeant Crowley &#8220;acted stupidly&#8221; for arresting Professor  	Gates on charges of disorderly conduct;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Whereas, as a former  	Constitutional Law Professor, President Obama well understands that all  	Americans are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and their  	actions should not be prejudged prior to being fully and fairly judged by an  	appropriate and objective authority after due process;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Whereas, President Obama&#8217;s  	nationally televised remarks may likely detrimentally influence the full and  	fair judgment by an appropriate and objective authority after due process  	regarding this local police response incident and, thereby, impair Sergeant  	Crowley&#8217;s legal and professional standing in relation to said incident; and</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Whereas, President Obama  	appeared at a daily White House Press briefing on July 24, 2009 to address  	his denouncement of Sergeant Crowley and stated: &#8220;I could have calibrated  	those words differently&#8221; but &#8220;I continue to believe, based on what I have  	heard, that there was an overreaction in pulling Professor Gates out of his  	home to the station.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Whereas, President Obama&#8217;s  	refusal to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Sergeant  	Crowley and, instead, reiterate his accusation impugning Sergeant Crowley&#8217;s  	professional conduct in the performance of his duties;</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Now therefore be it</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Resolved, That the House  	of Representatives--</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;"><strong>Calls upon President Obama  	to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Cambridge,  	Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley for having unfairly impugned  	and prejudged his professional conduct in this local police response  	incident.</strong>&#8220;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 1in;">
</li>
<li>What makes this &#8220;<em>controversy</em>&#8221; even more unnecessary&#8230;is that  	President Obama was right.  First of all, we have to set aside the  	allegations that the police made their decision based on race, simply  	because there has been no evidence of any kind to substantiate this claim.   	So evaluating the arrest on its merits (<em>or lack thereof</em>), here&#8217;s the  	timeline of events, according to the Cambridge police and <strong>Sergeant  	Crowley&#8217;s own report</strong>:  a 911 call comes in, and the caller mentions  	that it appears people might be breaking into the Gates residence, or that  	it might be the home&#8217;s occupants&#8230;police respond&#8230;Crowley radios in that  	he is talking to &#8220;<strong>a gentleman, says he resides here</strong>&#8221; who is being &#8220;<strong>uncooperative</strong>&#8220;&#8230;Crowley  	views Gates&#8217; ID, confirms that Gates lives in the house&#8230;minutes later  	Gates is arrested for &#8220;<em>disorderly conduct</em>&#8221; for what Crowley writes in  	his report was &#8220;<strong>yelling</strong>.&#8221;  What makes Crowley&#8217;s decision go  	beyond simply being &#8220;<em>unnecessary</em>&#8221; and into the realm of &#8220;<em>stupid?</em>&#8220;   	In Massachusetts&#8230;there have been a number of court cases clearly  	establishing that simply &#8220;<em>yelling</em>&#8221; at police <strong>DOES NOT</strong> constitute disorderly conduct.   For example, <em>Commonwealth v.  	Lopiano</em>, a 2004 decision, and <em>Commonwealth v. Mallahan</em>, a  	decision from last year, both involved similar incidents.  As the  	author of 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/obama-was-right-about-the_b_244888.html"> this commentary</a> points out, &#8220;<strong>Arresting someone for doing something  	that isn&#8217;t illegal is pretty stupid.</strong>&#8220;  Yes, it is.</li>
<li>Bill Maher was asked on CNN what he thought of the situation.   	Here&#8217;s the clip (<em>they address the Gates &#8220;controversy&#8221; after the  	discussion about the general intelligence level in America</em>):</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/w-lLQHn5GZ0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/w-lLQHn5GZ0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-lLQHn5GZ0">www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-lLQHn5GZ0</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>On a happier note:</strong> President Obama, Professor Gates, and  	Sergeant Crowley are going to sit down, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/gates-crowley-to-join-oba_n_245383.html"> drink a beer</a>, and discuss the matter.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">I love this</span>.   	People&#8230;all people&#8230;even police, professors, and presidents, <strong>MAKE  	MISTAKES</strong>.  All people have disagreements and misunderstandings.  	<strong>BUT</strong>&#8230;if people can sit down at a table over a round of beers (<em>or  	tea, or coffee, or fruit smoothies&#8230;whatever your preference</em>) and  	discuss the issues&#8230;then there is continued hope for an improved level of  	human dialogue, with more compassion, more civility, and more decency.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>DISRUPT -- The &#8220;Birther&#8221; Theorists:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>You&#8217;ve all heard the ridiculous conspiracy theory by now.  Despite  	both the short form and long form Birth Certificates being made available,  	the birth announcement in the local paper, and the verification by the  	Hawaii governor and the Board of Health of said documents, as well as the  	doctors&#8217; records of the birth&#8230;there are still some people out there who  	are crying, &#8220;<em>Why doesn&#8217;t Obama just show us the documents?  He&#8217;s not  	an American citizen!</em>&#8220;  And because these people are generally  	right-wing, fringe conservatives&#8230;many Republican legislators want to keep  	this ridiculous idea alive.  Oh&#8230;but most of them don&#8217;t want to be  	interviewed about it, because they know just how ridiculous it makes them  	look.  <a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/">FireDogLake</a> managed to  	catch this on film:</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g1o1p_ly7Yw&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g1o1p_ly7Yw&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1o1p_ly7Yw">www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1o1p_ly7Yw</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Some other legislators&#8230;are much more shameless and don&#8217;t mind publicly  	stating their support of the conspiracy.  Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.) 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25444_Page2.html">said</a> of the birthers, &#8220;<strong>They have a point&#8230;I don&#8217;t discourage it.</strong>&#8221; 	<em>Sigh</em>&#8230;</li>
<li>However, a clearly disproven conspiracy is beneath even some of Obama&#8217;s  	most strident opponents.  Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) has been extremely  	outspoken in his opposition to the President&#8217;s health care reform plan&#8230;but 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/28/demint-defends-obama-agai_n_246138.html"> on the subject of the birthers</a>: &#8220;<strong>I may have disagreements with [the  	president] on issues, but he is my president, he deserves our respect, and  	we need forget that nonsense&#8230;He is not only a citizen, he is our  	president.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Even <strong>BILL O&#8217;REILLY</strong> admits the rumor is &#8220;<em>bogus</em>&#8220;&#8230;oh, but  	he defends Lou Dobbs of CNN for discussing the theory and giving it a sense  	of legitimacy.</li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x1zrcXCJzK0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x1zrcXCJzK0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1zrcXCJzK0">www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1zrcXCJzK0</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li>Of course&#8230;the GOP are not the only ones given to ridiculous  	grandstanding over petty squabbles:  In response to the GOP led  	resolution to require that all future presidential candidates provide proof  	of citizenship before running for the office&#8230;the Democrats have sponsored  	their <strong>OWN HOUSE RESOLUTION</strong> to 	<a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/07/27/hawaii_resolution/index.html"> declare Hawaii</a> as Obama&#8217;s &#8220;<em>official birthplace</em>.&#8221;  Ummm&#8230;Dems?   	Don&#8217;t stoop to their level -- just sit back and watch.</li>
</ul>
<p>Again, I fault Republicans for playing this game <strong>NOW</strong>, when there are  so many pressing issues that require immediate remedy.  Now, more than  ever, it would serve the American public best if they were contributing  practical and thoughtful solutions, or even if they would simply contribute  sound ideas to improve the Democrats&#8217; solutions.  But as I said&#8230;when the  necessary leadership, creativity, <em>and dare I say</em>, maturity just aren&#8217;t to  be found: sometimes the &#8220;<strong><em>Three D&#8217;s</em></strong>&#8221; are the only tools available  to keep people from realizing that your political party has lost its way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/non-controversy-controversies-sotomayor-gates-and-birthers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

