<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; straw man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/straw-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Fear Machine:  Conservatives Inventing Their Own Demons</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-fear-machine-conservatives-inventing-their-own-demons/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-fear-machine-conservatives-inventing-their-own-demons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straw man]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its inception, the RLF acted primarily as a "fact-checking blog," serving to combat the vast number of emails and blog posts that surfaced during the 2008 campaign.  Well, the fearmongers are at it again.  We'll evaluate the story of an "economics professor" that has been circulating.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for the RLF to go back to its roots.  In its inception, the RLF acted primarily as a &#8220;<em>fact-checking blog</em>,&#8221; serving to combat the vast  number of emails and blog posts that surfaced during the 2008 campaign.   Most often, these emails/blogs sought to capitalize on the fears and prejudices  of the American citizenry through the use of fear and race based tactics, often  cleverly enveloped in entertaining stories, allegories, jokes, and gossip.</p>
<p>Well&#8230;it appears that &#8220;<em>they</em>&#8221; are at it again.</p>
<p>Here is an example to serve as food for thought.  A friend recently  posted the following &#8220;<em>story</em>&#8221; on a social networking site&#8230;I will post it  here in its entirety:</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had  never failed a single student before,<br />
but had once failed an entire class.</strong></p>
<p><strong>That class had insisted that Obama&#8217;s socialism worked and that no one would be  poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The professor then said, &#8220;OK,<br />
we will have an experiment in this class on Obama&#8217;s plan&#8221;.</strong></p>
<p><strong>All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so  no one would fail and no one would receive an A.</strong></p>
<p><strong>After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B.<br />
The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied  little were happy.?</strong></p>
<p><strong>As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had  studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride  too so they studied little.?<br />
The second test average was a D!<br />
No one was happy.</strong></p>
<p><strong>When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The scores never increased as bickering,<br />
blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would  study for the benefit of anyone else.?</strong></p>
<p><strong>All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that  socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the  effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one  will try or want to succeed.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Could not be any simpler than that.</strong></p>
<p><strong>As the late Adrian Rogers said, &#8216;you cannot multiply wealth by dividing  it..&#8217;</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>The allure of such stories is obvious.  The oversimplified nature of the  argument and the &#8220;<em>entertainment</em>&#8221; quality will garner assent from many who  don&#8217;t actually wish to understand the full argument any better, or to perform  any research or analysis.  This was reflected in many of the comments to my  friend&#8217;s post:</p>
<ul>
<li>One person wrote, &#8220;<strong>very nice&#8230;now if we could only get the rest of  	America to see and understand this&#8230;but every one is so caught up in the  	peace and love bullsh-t&#8230;and the lets help the world while our our country  	has problems crap&#8230;anyways dont get me started &#8230;nice post</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>Another had this to say: &#8220;<strong>I&#8217;ve seen this before. I love it. I&#8217;m tired  	of the sense of entitlement SO many have. I fear where we are headed.</strong>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p>My response: &#8220;<strong>Interesting story&#8230;too bad it is a classic &#8220;straw man.&#8221; It  represents the fallacious debate tactic where your opponent&#8217;s position is  misrepresented so it is easier to defeat. Obama is represented as proposing full  socialism, and a system where &#8216;no one is rich and no one is poor.&#8217;</strong></p>
<p><strong>This is NOT the position Obama has proposed.</strong></p>
<p><strong>For example, on health care he has proposed adding ONE single socialized plan to  compete against a multitude of private plans. No one pickets with &#8220;down with  socialism&#8221; signs outside of the post office, because it is somehow unfair to  UPS, FedEx, DHL, etc. No one pickets outside public schools, because they  represent unfair competition to private schools.</strong></p>
<p><strong><strong>To follow this example: Too poor to send your letter FedEX&#8230;go to the Post  Office. Too poor to send your kids to private school&#8230;send them to public. Too  poor to afford health insurance&#8230;we&#8217;ll see you in the emergency room&#8230;and the  cost of your visit will be added to EVERYONE ELSE&#8217;S premium.</strong>&#8220;</strong></p>
<p><span>While I attempted to address the issue at  hand&#8230;I neglected to address the <strong>LARGER </strong>issue.  <strong><em>Didn&#8217;t I</em>?</strong></span></p>
<p><span>When, during the Bush administration, our  country&#8230;the country they claim to want &#8220;<em>back</em>&#8220;&#8230;was taking clear steps  towards totalitarianism and fascism&#8230;where was their outrage?   Americans&#8230;jailed indefinitely without access to habeas corpus, an attorney, or  any other element of due process.  Citizens&#8217; phones&#8230;tapped without legal  warrant.  Citizens&#8217; phone records and emails&#8230;illegally gathered.   Unprecedented violations of the separations of Church and State.   Unprecedented trespasses of the Executive Branch into the powers of the  Legislative Branch.  Billions of dollars channeled, often outside  established, legal bidding practices, to the private military industrial  complex.  Big pharma, big insurance, big lending, big investing  industries&#8230;acting outside the law, making record profits, defrauding  consumers, and without regulation.  The Justice Department and the  Intelligence Community&#8230;politicized and lying to Congress, and by extension,  the American people.  The White House, cherry-picking intelligence, even  using disproven intelligence, to goad Congress and the American people to war.</span></p>
<p><span>All dissent&#8230;labeled unpatriotic&#8230;even  traitorous.  <strong>Where was their frightened outrage then?</strong></span></p>
<p><span>Now, they shadowbox at nonexistent demons.   They use words like &#8220;<em>socialism</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>fascism</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>communism</em>,&#8221;  and even &#8220;<em>nazism</em>&#8221; without knowledge of their meaning or their proper  application.  They accept the wild hyperbole that they hear as fact:  one  &#8220;<em>new socialized insurance plan</em>&#8221; equals a &#8220;<em>government takeover</em>.&#8221;  A &#8220;<em>new  tax for the wealthiest 1% of Americans</em>&#8221; equals &#8220;<em>nobody gets to be rich  anymore.</em>&#8220;  Optional &#8220;<em>hospice and medical rights counseling</em>&#8221; for seniors equals &#8220;<em>forced euthanasia</em>.&#8221; Affordable, subsidized health insurance for the lower and middle classes equals &#8220;<em>free handouts for entitled, lazy people.</em>&#8220;  Without a single fact to support it, they believe that  government is taking over all industries, the economy will collapse, their taxes  will become so high that they can&#8217;t pay them, we will lose all of our rights, we  will lose all choice, and that Obama&#8230;<em>is the bogeyman</em>.</span></p>
<p><span>It reminds me of a child, running across his  darkened bedroom at night.  Leaping into bed, because his big brother told  him, &#8220;<em>there are monsters under there</em>.&#8221;  The child won&#8217;t look under  the bed, because he is afraid of what he might see.  But if he would listen  to his own reason, and summon up the courage to do so&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span>&#8230;he&#8217;d see there&#8217;s nothing there.  No  monster.  No bogeyman. <strong>Just stark reality. </strong></span></p>
<p><span>To those people I say:  Your &#8220;<em>big brother</em>&#8221; has lied to you.  He told you that your President, your teachers, your friends and coworkers, and many other of your fellow citizens are &#8220;<em>monsters</em>.&#8221;  Some, he said, are &#8220;<em>monsters</em>&#8221; called &#8220;<em>socialists</em>&#8220;&#8230;others are what he called &#8220;<em>entitled people</em>&#8220;&#8230;others he mentioned were &#8220;<em>liberals</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>elites</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>foreigners</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>non-Christians</em>.&#8221;  If you would just consult reality for a moment (<em>&#8220;look under the bed,&#8221; so to speak</em>)&#8230;you&#8217;d see the people labeled in this way are no bogeymen.  Even the people who told you these tall tales aren&#8217;t &#8220;<em>evil</em>&#8221; or &#8220;<em>monsters</em>&#8220;&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span><strong>&#8230;they&#8217;re just liars.</strong><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-fear-machine-conservatives-inventing-their-own-demons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

