<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; The View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/the-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos Theory Edition: Whores, Hags, Dog Mess, and the Year of the Bible</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-whores-hags-dog-mess-and-the-year-of-the-bible/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-whores-hags-dog-mess-and-the-year-of-the-bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Zubaydah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ali Soufan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Ventura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Secretary Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruch Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Hutchison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/modules/wordpress/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Friday, everybody&#8230;that means, of course, it is time for the weekly installment of &#8220;Chaos Theory:&#8221; a round-up of all the week&#8217;s news that I was unable to cover during the rest of the week. POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY: I love a good sparring match as much as the next guy&#8230;and how could you do much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Friday, everybody&#8230;that means, of course, it is time for the weekly  installment of &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>:&#8221; a round-up of all the week&#8217;s news that I was  unable to cover during the rest of the week.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLITICIANS BEHAVING BADLY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>I love a good sparring match as much as the next guy&#8230;and how could you  	do much better than Michele Bachmann (R) debating with Barney Frank (D),  	moderated by CNN&#8217;s Lou Dobbs.  Frank is <em>crazy-smart</em>, Dobbs is  	<em>crazy-angry</em>, and Bachmann is just <strong><em>crazy-crazy</em></strong>.  	<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/05/barney-frank-faces-down-bachmann-on-acorn-funding.php?ref=fpb"> The subject</a>:  Bachmann has proposed that federal funding should be  	withdrawn from any group that has any of its members indicted.  Her  	primary goal, is to see the funding for ACORN taken away&#8230;but it didn&#8217;t  	take long for Frank to point out how ridiculous the idea really is.  I  	once heard &#8220;<em>you can indict a ham sandwich</em>,&#8221; and it&#8217;s true&#8230;and because it  	is true, it means that anyone who wanted to hurt a group for political  	reasons would only have to get one of its members indicted, which is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">easy</span> to  	do.  Frank also pointed out that funding ACORN and groups like it&#8230;was  	an idea that came from Republicans during the <strong>BUSH ADMINISTRATION</strong>, as an  	effort to contract out community outreach instead of growing government  	agencies.  He also mentioned that her measure could hurt groups she  	doesn&#8217;t intend it to, citing when AIPAC members got indicted, only to have  	all charges dropped&#8230;and also, that when Tom DeLay was indicted, under  	Bachmann&#8217;s plan, all the House Republicans would have lost their funding.   	<strong>Way to really think it through, Michelle.</strong></li>
<li>Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) has a new argument against Global Warming  	theories: CO2 emissions <strong>CAN&#8217;T</strong> be harmful&#8230;because there is CO2 in  	carbonated soft drinks.  It&#8217;s arguments like this that have led The  	Economist 	<a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2009/05/profiles_in_stupidity.cfm"> to include Barton</a> in their series, &#8220;<em>Profiles in Stupidity</em>.&#8221;  An  	excerpt: &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;ve chronicled Mr. Barton&#8217;s stupidity (there really is no other  	word for it) before. Anyone looking for exhibit A in what&#8217;s wrong with the  	Republican Party should start with the good congressman&#8230;Please don&#8217;t get  	me wrong, it&#8217;s not simply that Mr. Barton is a climate-change skeptic. There  	are plenty of those and some make decent arguments against moving ahead with  	measures to control emissions. The problem with Mr. Barton is that he is  	wholly uninterested in the science and statistics of the global warming  	debate. He is about as curious as a dead cat, as is his colleague in the  	Senate, James Inhofe.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>I continue to be shocked to see the RNC trot out attacks on Obama that  	were used during the presidential campaign, were debunked/explained at that  	time, and in the long run, proved ineffective.  	<a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/factcheck/200905210003">Their latest</a>:   	they want to remind you, that during the campaign Obama said there was a  	&#8220;<strong>fundamental flaw</strong>&#8221; in the Constitution&#8230;and that means he doesn&#8217;t respect  	the document&#8230;or America.  Of course, the flaw that Obama was  	referring to&#8230;<strong>WAS SLAVERY</strong>.  Even the founding fathers expressed  	disappointment in themselves for failing to resolve the issue at that time,  	and for leaving the door to slavery open.  So, unless you just happen  	to be a &#8220;big fan&#8221; of slavery&#8230;I think we can all agree with Obama on this one.</li>
<li><em><strong>AND</strong></em> in <strong>ANOTHER</strong> classic example of failing to learn from past  	mistakes&#8230;you&#8217;ve probably heard people speak of LBJ&#8217;s &#8220;<em>Daisy</em>&#8221; ad&#8230;the ad  	which showed a little girl playing, and then the image of a mushroom cloud.   	When people talk of this ad, they use it an example of the lowest, most  	shameful form of blatant fearmongering ever perpetrated on the American  	public in the form of a public TV spot.  It is the one, disgusting act, by which all other attempts to  	manipulate voters by scaring them to death, are judged by.  <em>Want to see  	it?</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/22/rnc-remixes-1964-daisy-ad_n_206672.html"> Look no further</a> than the <strong>NEW</strong> RNC ad.  <strong>Here it is:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/H7qkEholuT8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/H7qkEholuT8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>Texas Governor Rick Perry (R) recently took some heat for his suggestion  	that Texas should secede from the United States&#8230;some people seemed to  	think that was kind of &#8220;<em>un-American</em>.&#8221;  And now, engaged in the  	political fight of his life against fellow Republican Sen. Kay Bailey  	Hutchison, his advisor, David Carney has come up with 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/rick-perry-aide-dont-open_n_206042.html"> a provocative reason</a> why Hutchison should not be considered.   	Carney said that drawing in new voters, like the women that support  	Hutchison, would be good for the GOP, but &#8220;<strong>that doesn&#8217;t mean you take your  	principles and throw them out the door and become a whorehouse and let  	anybody in who wants to come in, regardless.</strong>&#8221;  Nice&#8230;if there&#8217;s one  	thing women voters like to hear, it&#8217;s female politicians inferred to be  	&#8220;<em>whores</em>.&#8221;</li>
<li>A <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/20/steele-liberalism-kill/">Public Service Announcement</a> from RNC Chairman Michael Steele:  	<strong>Being a  	liberal&#8230;can KILL YOU</strong>.  Steele says, &#8220;<strong>The Republican Party’s  	credibility as the reliably conservative choice has been damaged, and it’s  	up to us to fix it. Faith, freedom, personal responsibility, respect for  	life and prosperity&#8230;Like a bad diet, liberalism will kill you.  	It’s a drug we don’t need to be hooked on. We are what stand  	between an America of prosperity or dependency. Which one do you want?</strong>&#8221;   	Now you know&#8230;and knowing is half the battle.</li>
<li>Georgia Republican Representative Paul Broun 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22832.html">has a dream</a>&#8230;he  	wants 2010 to be officially declared the <em>Year of the Bible</em>.   	Broun also wants to make sure that nobody thinks this has <strong>ANYTHING</strong> to  	do with Christianity&#8230;because, of course, some people might call the  	government endorsing religion &#8220;<em>unconstitutional</em>.&#8221;  No&#8230;Broun  	says it&#8217;s just because the book has been really, really important in the  	creation of America.  <em>And people say the Republicans don&#8217;t have any  	new ideas&#8230;</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MEDIA HACKS, PUNDITS, AND OTHER INVETERATE LIARS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Under allegations that she knew our government was using torture and she  	did nothing, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has claimed that the CIA never briefed her  	that that torture was being utilized.  So&#8230;how does the conservative  	media question the veracity of Pelosi&#8217;s claims?  By attacking her  	looks, of course.  Media Matters put together 	<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200905180006">this list</a>, which  	includes comparisons between Pelosi and a &#8220;<strong>hag</strong>,&#8221; assertions that she  	uses Botox, and a claim that she is unable to perform &#8220;<strong>human facial  	expression.</strong>&#8221;  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Very</span> highbrow.  <strong>Here&#8217;s a clip:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vhd9_sqjHsI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vhd9_sqjHsI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>I feel like I&#8217;m taking crazy pills:</strong> recently, right-wing radio  	host Michael Savage 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/19/michael-savage-tees-off-o_n_205392.html"> attacked</a>&#8230;Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh?  Savage said: &#8220;.<strong>..here  	in America, I&#8217;ve had some people come to my aid. They see the bigger  	picture. They&#8217;re not like [Bill] O&#8217;Reilly; they&#8217;re not like Limbaugh, who&#8217;s  	the biggest disappointment of all. Limbaugh has turned out to be the biggest  	phony of all of them, all of them. Amongst all of them, he is the biggest  	fraud. Rush Limbaugh is a fraud. When he was accused of the drug usage, I  	supported him. But that man is a one-way street. It&#8217;s all about him. He&#8217;s in  	it for nobody but himself.</strong>&#8221;  This seems to stem from the fact that  	neither O&#8217;Reilly nor Limbaugh defended Savage when the United Kingdom  	announced that Savage was not welcome in their country because he is a  	person who &#8220;<em>stirs up hate</em>.&#8221;  Ooops&#8230;I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll all be  	BFF&#8217;s again in no time.</li>
<li>Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura is on a <strong>MEDIA RAMPAGE</strong>.   	First&#8230;he proves that he is clearly &#8220;<em>crazy, not stupid</em>&#8221; on Sean  	Hannity&#8217;s show, where he proceeds to make Hannity <span style="text-decoration: underline;">very</span> uncomfortable&#8230;leading Hannity to make several inane assertions, like  	saying that Bush &#8220;<strong>inherited</strong>&#8221; 9/11 (<em>Sean&#8230;it&#8217;s hard for a  	president to inherit something that happens nine months <strong>AFTER</strong> he  	takes office</em>), and that &#8220;<strong>loving Reagan</strong>&#8221; counts as a notable  	accomplishment.  	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/19/jesse-ventura-gets-in-the_n_205146.html"> That clip</a>, is worth viewing.  Ventura was upset that Hannity cut  	the interview short, as he wanted to discuss waterboarding&#8230;as a Navy SEAL,  	Ventura experienced waterboarding during his training, and 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/22/jesse-ventura-challenges_n_206694.html"> he claims</a> that he could waterboard Hannity and get him to admit that &#8220;<strong>Barack  	Obama is the greatest president.</strong>&#8221;  He says the reason Hannity cut  	things short: &#8220;<strong>He&#8217;s scared to death of me.  It was over in a few  	minutes and that was it.</strong>&#8221; Ventura recently took on Elisabeth Hasselbeck  	of The View, and 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/18/ventura-and-hasselbeck-de_n_204774.html"> to a similar result</a>.  He told her: &#8220;<strong>If waterboarding is OK, why  	don&#8217;t we let our police do it to suspects so they can learn what they know?   	If waterboarding is OK, why didn&#8217;t we waterboard [Timothy] McVeigh and  	Nichols, the Oklahoma City bombers, to find out if there were more people  	involved?&#8230;We only seem to waterboard Muslims&#8230;Have we waterboarded anyone  	else? Name me someone else who has been waterboarded.</strong>&#8221;  Hasselbeck  	could only respond by trying to make the debate about Pelosi&#8230;at which  	point Ventura points out the obvious fact that ordering and performing  	torture is certainly a worse crime than &#8220;<em>knowing about it,</em>&#8221; and  	therefore is more deserving of our attention.  Lastly, 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/jesse-ventura-lays-waste_n_205962.html"> Ventura visits</a> FOX and Friends, where he reminds the hosts that we are a  	nation of <strong>LAWS</strong>&#8230;to which Brian Kilmeade responds than laws aren&#8217;t so  	important when &#8220;<strong>people are on fire</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>buildings are blowing up</strong>.&#8221;   	Kilmeade goes the ridiculous step further of saying that he will stop  	supporting torture when &#8220;<strong>they&#8217;re dead.</strong>&#8221;  Ventura&#8230;again, a Navy  	SEAL, was not impressed with Kilmeade&#8217;s tough talk: &#8220;<strong>Really? Have you  	enlisted? Have you enlisted or are you just talking?&#8230;Go walk the walk,  	don&#8217;t talk the talk.</strong>&#8220;</li>
<li>I&#8217;ll just treat this item with a brief summary of events:  FOX&#8217;s  	Glenn Beck is invited to appear on <em>The View</em>.  Glenn Beck bumps  	into Whoopi Goldberg and Barbara Walters on the train and they have a  	pleasant discussion.  Glenn Beck goes on the radio, lies about what  	happened on the train, and portrays Goldberg and Walters as bitchy divas.   	Glenn Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/whoopi-goldberg-calls-gle_n_205845.html"> goes on</a> <em>The View</em>, the clip from his radio show is played, and it  	is pointed out that he is a fraud and a liar.  Glenn Beck sheepishly  	smiles, reminds his hosts that he is not a journalist, and is therefore not  	required to research, use facts, or make true statements on his show.   	Goldberg responds that he is a &#8220;<strong>lying sack of dog mess.</strong>&#8221;  Glenn  	Beck 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/21/glenn-beck-demands-a-damn_n_206366.html"> on his next radio show</a>&#8230;demands &#8220;<strong>a damn apology</strong>.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s  	the clip from <em>The View</em>&#8230;it&#8217;s really amazing:</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/W2FK2vchoEo&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/W2FK2vchoEo&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GAY RIGHTS:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Yesterday, I was very critical of President Obama, for not taking steps  	to end the military&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell</strong>&#8221; policy, under which valuable,  	veteran soldiers are being discharged from the service because they are gay.   	In part, I was reacting to statements from Pentagon officials, which  	indicated that the president was taking no significant steps towards  	changing or repealing the policy.  However, yesterday, White House  	Press Secretary Gibbs 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/21/gibbs-breaks-from-pentago_n_206534.html"> painted a very different picture</a>, saying that &#8220;<strong>active discussions</strong>&#8221; were  	taking place and that &#8220;t<strong>he President is involved in these discussions. It  	was the President&#8217;s commitment to overturn the policy that&#8217;s not in our  	national interest that is the reason for these discussions and for the  	effort to overturn this. So I think the notion somehow &#8211; the reason Congress  	is involved is the only durable and lasting way with which to overturn the  	policy is to do it by law.</strong>&#8221;  Let&#8217;s hope this is the case.</li>
<li>The National Organization for Marriage is at it again.  You may  	remember they put out a TV spot recently that was <span style="text-decoration: underline;">so</span> overly dramatic, and  	<span style="text-decoration: underline;">so</span> overtly pandering to fear and ignorance, that it was openly mocked from  	almost every side.  So, <em>of course</em>, in their second ad they&#8217;ve learned  	from their mistakes and present a more reasonable, intelligent argument&#8230;<strong>oh  	no, wait</strong>&#8230;they put out 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/national-organization-for_n_206003.html"> this nonsense</a> about terribly sad and confused children, psychically  	damaged by the very thought of same-sex marriage.  I don&#8217;t know about  	you&#8230;but most children I have seen dealing with gay relationships of  	parents or parents&#8217; friends, do better at grasping the important concepts  	than most adults do.  Children&#8230;understand what it means to be with  	someone because you love them.  <strong>Here&#8217;s the clip:</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/haVqcPfeqKI&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/haVqcPfeqKI&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allownetworking="internal" allowscriptaccess="never"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>GHOSTS OF THE PAST:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Members of the Bush Administration have been attempting for months now  	to hide behind the Justice Department memos, taking the position that while  	the use of &#8220;<em>enhanced interrogation techniques</em>&#8221; (<em>read as &#8220;torture&#8221;</em>) may have  	been illegal&#8230;.because they had memos say &#8220;<em>it&#8217;s ok</em>&#8221; they are in the clear.   	But, what if they ordered/condoned/implemented the techniques <strong>BEFORE</strong> the  	memos?  Well, that may be the case, since the White House&#8217;s own  	statements place the capture and interrogation of  Abu Zubaydah as  	starting in March 2002&#8230;and the memos were not issued until August.   	Ali Soufan, a former FBI interrogator, has been testifying in Congress about  	Zubaydah&#8217;s interrogation, and has made it clear that the detainee was  	cooperative and gave good information&#8230;until the CIA and its contractors  	took over and instantly began torturing him. 	<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104350361">One  	source</a> indicates that the CIA interrogator would send a &#8220;<strong>top-secret  	cable</strong>&#8221; to the CIA each day, requesting permission to torture Zubaydah&#8230;the  	CIA would forward the memo to the White House, and White House counsel  	Alberto Gonzales would approve the measures.  <em>Oh Alberto</em>&#8230;you may have  	really stepped in it this time: your appearances before Congress told us you  	were incompetent and had <span style="text-decoration: underline;">no</span> knowledge of Constitutional Law, but this seems  	to indicate that you were foolish <em><strong>beyond even our worst imagining</strong></em>.</li>
<li>Oh&#8230;I pointed out Wednesday that some GOP leaders think that Pelosi did  	the <strong>UNTHINKABLE</strong> in accusing the CIA of deceiving Congress&#8230;despite the fact  	that they have <strong>OFTEN</strong> been found to be deceiving Congress, and there are  	several other legislators (<em>including Republicans</em>) <strong>ALSO</strong> accusing the agency  	of similar behavior.  In light of these accusations, the CIA has  	produced documentation regarding who gave briefings, on what dates, and  	which subjects were covered.  Some initial discrepancies were  	immediately detected (<em>wrong dates, wrong attendees, falsified entries</em>)&#8230;and  	now&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/cia-interrogation-briefin_n_206090.html">more  	mistakes</a>.  CIA&#8230;after the whole &#8220;<em>weapons of mass destruction</em>&#8221;  	thing and now this &#8220;<em>we swear we told Congress we were using torture</em>&#8221;  	thing&#8230;it&#8217;s looking like they&#8217;re either <strong>incompetent or deceptive</strong>&#8230;there&#8217;s  	no third option.</li>
<li>A lot has been made of the &#8220;<em>showdown</em>&#8221; between Obama&#8217;s speech on  	the subject of closing Gitmo, and former VP Cheney&#8217;s speech in defense of  	Gitmo and torture tactics.  Obama&#8217;s speech has been met with mostly  	favorable review&#8230;Cheney&#8217;s speech&#8230; <em>not so much</em>.  It appears some  	people are a bit put off by the obvious omissions, errors, and hyperbole, in  	Cheney&#8217;s argument.  For example, he cited the Director of National Intelligence, Adm. 	Dennis Blair as supporting the techniques&#8230;when what Blair really said was,  	&#8220;<strong>there is no way of knowing whether the same information could have been  	obtained through other means. The bottom line is that these techniques hurt  	our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far  	outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our  	national security.</strong>&#8221;  Cheney said that torture had &#8220;<strong>prevented the  	violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent  	people</strong>,&#8221; despite the top-secret 2004 CIA inspector general&#8217;s investigation  	which found that these techniques had not provided <strong>ANY</strong> significantly helpful  	information, nor had they prevented <strong>ANY</strong> attacks.  He said that Obama&#8217;s  	release of the &#8220;<em>torture memos</em>&#8221; has &#8220;<strong>flatly</strong>&#8221; contrary to U.S. National  	Security&#8230;when, in fact, Admiral Blair had recommended it.  Cheney  	patted himself on the back for pursuing Al Qaeda&#8230;even though 	<span id="lw_1242962158_11" class="yshortcuts">Osama bin Laden</span> and  	his chief lieutenant, Ayman al Zawahri still remain at large.  For a  	thorough examination of how Cheney played fast and loose with the facts  	(<em>which should surprise <strong>NO ONE</strong></em>)&#8230;<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20090521/pl_mcclatchy/3237981">here&#8217;s  	a good read</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PALINWATCH:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Most Misguided Campaign Idea:</strong> John Coale, husband to FOX News&#8217;  	Greta Van Susteren and one-time Palin advisor, approached Palin during her  	husband&#8217;s Iron Dog &#8220;<em>snow machine</em>&#8221; race with a <strong>DOOZY</strong> of an idea:   	<strong>pay  	off Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign debt</strong>.  	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22681.html">Coale&#8217;s idea</a> consisted of using money from Palin&#8217;s PAC to help Clinton pay down her  	debt&#8230;in hopes that this &#8220;<em>friendship</em>&#8221; would help Palin among moderates and  	liberals.  Even Palin realized instantly that this idea was a  	non-starter.  <strong>One:</strong> conservatives who donated the money to her PAC would  	be furious.  <strong>Two:</strong> the geniuses who would vote for Palin just  	because she is a woman already support her.  <strong>Three:</strong> the rest  	of the moderates and liberals&#8230;will <span style="text-decoration: underline;">never</span> support someone with Palin&#8217;s  	agenda (<em>or her loopy behavior</em>), no matter who she befriends.</li>
<li>Sarah Palin, after RNC Chairman Steele&#8217;s recent speech where he  	attempted to revitalize the Republican Party, declared Steele to be &#8220;<strong>bold  	and courageous.</strong>&#8221;  <em>Really?</em> This guy is trying to rebrand the GOP  	as the &#8220;<em>party with lots of ideas</em>&#8220;&#8230;but can&#8217;t think of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">one</span> to mention.   	He is consistently mocked for his use of &#8220;<em>hip-hop</em>&#8221; language which comes  	across as forced, juvenile, and unprofessional.  His own party wants  	him replaced as chairman, and until that can happen they are trying to take  	away all of his control over the party finances.  <em>This</em>&#8230;this is the  	guy you&#8217;re going to support, Sarah? She said: &#8220;<strong>Today, we have a friend in  	RNC Chairman Michael Steele, and his bold and courageous speech defines his  	leadership goals that will guide us all through this most difficult time for  	our nation.</strong>&#8221;  His speech can also be seen 	<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22750.html">here</a>,  	along with Palin&#8217;s comments&#8230;I think when the majority of the GOP thinks  	the guy is an embarrassment and a media whore, it would be best not to label  	him as the &#8220;<em>great hope</em>&#8221; of the party&#8217;s future.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MISCELLANY:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Ok&#8230;I know it&#8217;s the worst kind of gossip, but if it is true, it is  	<strong>HYSTERICAL</strong>.  By now everyone has heard the name &#8220;<em>Carrie Prejean</em>.&#8221;   	<strong>Quick Summary: </strong> Prejean is Miss California&#8230;she entered the Miss USA  	pageant&#8230;when asked about gay marriage, she voiced her opposition to  	it&#8230;when she lost the competition she blamed the judges for being  	prejudiced against prejudiced people&#8230;it came out that the Miss California  	pageant committee paid for her breast implants&#8230;several partly-nude  	pictures of her surfaced&#8230;Trump did not take her crown, even though the  	photos clearly showed she violated her contract&#8230;now she serves as a  	spokesperson against gay marriage.  <strong>AND NOW</strong>&#8230;a woman 	<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/CelebrityCafe/story?id=7640920&amp;page=1"> has come forward</a> claiming that she had a lesbian relationship with  	Prejean&#8217;s mother&#8230;a recent relationship that ended only weeks before the  	Miss USA competition. <em>AWK-Waaaard!</em></li>
</ul>
<p>Another interesting week&#8230;as long as Obama stays busy, Fox News stays on the  air, Palin still thinks she can be president, and Republicans keep struggling to  make sense to somebody (<strong><em>anybody!</em></strong>)&#8230;I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll have plenty to talk about.</p>
<p>Have a great weekend, my friends&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/chaos-theory-edition-whores-hags-dog-mess-and-the-year-of-the-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

