<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reality Liberation Front &#187; Vice President Biden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityliberationfront.com/tag/vice-president-biden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityliberationfront.com</link>
	<description>Freeing Reality From The Chains Of Subjectivity Since 1987</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Public Option:  A Look At Defenders, Opponents, And Its Chances</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-public-option-a-look-at-defenders-opponents-and-its-chances/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-public-option-a-look-at-defenders-opponents-and-its-chances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Secretary Sibelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Daschle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Feingold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President Biden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having moved on from the debate on imaginary "death panels," the public option of the health care reform bill is squarely in the sights of anti-reform critics.  Therefore, I felt we should dedicate some time here to the public option, examined by itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having moved on from the debate on imaginary &#8220;<em>death panels</em>,&#8221; the  public option of the health care reform bill is squarely in the sights of  anti-reform critics.  Therefore, I felt we should dedicate some time here  to the public option, examined by itself:</p>
<p><strong>WHAT IS IT:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A new, government-sponsored insurance policy that individuals may select  	instead of one of the many private insurance company policies.   	Designed to make sure that more of the 40 million uninsured Americans can  	get insurance, and to force private insurance companies to start offering  	better service at more reasonable rates in order to compete against the new  	public insurance.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>WHAT IT IS NOT:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>First, it is not free&#8230;<em>it&#8217;s cheap</em>, because it will be  	subsidized.  Second, it is not a &#8220;<em>government takeover of healthcare</em>&#8220;&#8230;all  	of the hospitals, doctors, nurses, drug companies, and insurance companies  	will continue to stay as they are&#8230;it just that some patients will be  	filing claims with a new &#8220;<em>insurance provider.</em>&#8220;  Third, it is not  	replacing private insurance&#8230;you are not forced to go on it, you can keep  	your existing plan, and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office&#8217;s report  	clearly states that it will not drive private insurers out of business.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>WHAT THE MEDIA IS SAYING:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Regardless of your media source, whether it be any of the TV networks,  	cable news, newspapers, or radio&#8230;you&#8217;re likely hearing that the public  	option is in &#8220;<em>trouble</em>.&#8221;  In fact, almost all news outlets seem  	determined (<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32461751/ns/politics-white_house/">as  	in this article</a>) to paint the option as a &#8220;l<em>osing battle</em>,&#8221; and a  	recent 	<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32464936/ns/politics-white_house/"> CBS/Wall Street Journal poll</a> showed overwhelming public opposition to  	the government-run plan.</li>
<li><strong>Oh, but wait</strong>&#8230;turns out that CBS\Wall Street Poll&#8230;the question  	was reworded to remove the word &#8220;<em>choice</em>.&#8221;  Why would the  	pollster want to give the impression in the poll question that people would  	be <strong>FORCED</strong> onto the public plan?  Oh yeah&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/19/pollster-behind-controver_n_263057.html">he&#8217;s  	worked extensively for America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP)</a>, an  	organization that opposes the public option, and who he lists as a current  	client.   Wendell Potter, former vice president of insurance giant  	CIGNA, remarked, &#8220;<strong>I think it&#8217;s a very big deal to drop the word</strong>.  	<strong>This has been a strategy the industry has had for many years. They ask  	questions in many ways, knowing the way they are asking the questions will  	skew the result. Dropping the word choice is very important. It plays into  	some of the fears some of the people have been hearing lately, that the  	government would leave them without an option</strong>.&#8221;  Curiously, the  	same poll showed that the majority of Americans have widespread  	misconceptions about what is actually in the reform bill&#8230;and at the same  	time the poll was <strong>CREATING</strong> misconceptions.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>FYI</strong></span>:   	Most polls, not run by men working for big insurance, show <strong>OVERWHELMING</strong> public support for the public option&#8230;<a href="http://pollingreport.com/health.htm">see  	here</a>.</li>
<li>But one corrupt pollster doesn&#8217;t seem to explain why <strong>ALL</strong> of the  	media seems to be wishing for the public option&#8217;s demise.  	<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/media-eager-to-report-death-of-public-option/"> Tommy Christopher at Mediaite</a> has a theory:  One, they are run by  	megalithic corporate entities who are (<em>in general</em>) against  	reform&#8230;two, they will seize on anything that they can hype to fill a slow  	news day.  On the latter suggestion, they took &#8220;<em>throwaway lines</em>&#8221;  	from Press Secretary Gibbs and Health Secretary Sibelius, where they  	commented that there would still be a reform bill even if the public option  	was removed.  	<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/media-eager-to-report-death-of-public-option/"> As Christopher points out</a>, this is a question they get asked a million  	times a day, and the correct political answer to it is always, &#8220;<em>the bill  	is still valuable without the public option.</em>&#8220;  This is then hyped  	by the media as, &#8220;<em>Obama Administration Gives Up On Public Option!!!</em>&#8220;   	More realistically, when Obama and friends make such statements, they just  	don&#8217;t want to give Republicans the satisfaction of thinking &#8220;<em>if we kill  	the public option, Obama can&#8217;t declare a health care reform victory.</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>WHO IS FIGHTING FOR IT:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Liberal Media:</span> From 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/18/maddow-public-option-dyin_n_261811.html"> Rachel Maddow</a> to 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-tv/arianna-discusses-the-myt_b_262643.html"> Keith Olbermann</a>, the message is clear:  The public option is the  	very <strong>HEART</strong> of the reform, because with out it, the insurance  	companies keep doing exactly as they are, and the uninsured&#8230;stay  	uninsured, and we continue towards another economic crisis because of it.   	No longer are the fingers pointed solely at the Republican opponents of the  	option, and liberal pundits are increasingly calling on the Obama  	administration to abandon bipartisan efforts (<em>which won&#8217;t gain even one  	Republican vote</em>) and to get their fellow Democrats behind the bill  	through whatever convincing/coercing is required.  <em>Here&#8217;s Rachel:</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z144CnlNyrk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z144CnlNyrk&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z144CnlNyrk">www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z144CnlNyrk</a></p></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Unions:</span> The unions, like the AFL-CIO have been spending  	money to support the option through TV spots, and have been organizing  	counter-protests at town halls.  Now, they have sent 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/18/labor-warns-dems-well-sit_n_262232.html"> a clear reminder</a> to the White House and Congress:  &#8220;<em>we voted you  	in, and we can vote you out</em>.&#8221;  If Democrats fail to show the proper  	backbone on this issue&#8230;the much-needed support of organized labor during  	the next election, <strong>MAY NOT BE THERE</strong>.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Big Dems:</span> Health Secretary Sibelius 	<a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/08/18/2033874.aspx">has  	restated that</a>, while she did say that loss of the option does not equal  	total defeat (<em>again, what else is she going to say?</em>) that its  	inclusion is still top priority.  House Speaker Pelosi 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/pelosi-to-white-house-were-standing-firm-behind-public-option/"> has said</a> that the House Democrats stand firmly in favor of the public  	option.  President Obama&#8230;has finally 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/19/obama-to-use-biden-to-twi_n_263146.html"> given the task</a> of &#8220;<em>Democrat-arm-twisting</em>&#8221; to Vice President Joe  	Biden.  And now&#8230;<a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/08/will-the-wh-use-hillary-on-health-care.html">there  	is even talk</a> of bring Big Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary  	Clinton into the fight, as their active support for the option will sway  	many legislators <strong>AND</strong> citizens.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Administration:</span> <em>Duh</em>&#8230;it&#8217;s their baby.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Liberal Dems:</span> The number is 60 and growing&#8230;60 members  	of the House 	<a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/sixty-house-liberals-to-white-house-no-public-option-no-health-care-reform/"> sent a letter</a> to President Obama saying that the public option is <strong>SO</strong> important, that they won&#8217;t support the bill <strong>WITHOUT</strong> it.   	Senators Rockefeller and Feingold, as well as Representatives Weiner and  	Pelosi have been vocal and active in leading the charge amongst the  	legislative &#8220;<em>ground troops.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Liberal Activists:</span> They are making phone calls, writing  	letters, and 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/19/public-option-fundraiser_n_262955.html"> even managed to raise</a> over $100,000 in 24 hours in support of the public  	option.  	<a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/liberals-press-senate-dems-to-move-without-grassley-2009-08-18.html"> Their message is simple</a>:  screw Chuck Grassley and compromising  	that won&#8217;t earn any GOP votes&#8230;<strong>go it alone and do it right.</strong> And&#8230;Congress seems to be listening and 	<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/health/policy/19repubs.html?_r=1&amp;hp"> coming around to this way of thinking</a>.</li>
<li>And&#8230;most people in the United States&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>WHO IS FIGHTING AGAINST IT:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Conservative Media:</span> No big surprise&#8230;when even the  	mainstream media is having fun predicting the death of the public option, we  	can only expect Fox, Drudge, Rush, and others to be having a <strong>FIELD DAY </strong>over it.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Some (but not all) Blue Dog Dems:</span> Many conservative &#8220;<em>Blue  	Dog</em>&#8221; Dems 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/29/deal-with-blue-dogs-sets-_n_247333.html"> have been brought into the fold</a> through a series of talks and minor  	concessions&#8230;but not all of them.  Senator Max Baucus, having received  	more money from the health industry lately than any other legislator&#8230;is,  	not surprisingly, 	<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/08/why_is_max_baucus_sticking_by.html"> dragging his feet</a> and continues to abandon quality portions of the plan  	to appease Senator Grassley.  Senator Kent Conrad 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/18/health-care-co-op-support_n_262340.html"> has started pimping</a> the &#8220;<strong>co-op</strong>&#8221; idea (<em>see below</em>) and  	claims that there are not enough Democratic Senate votes to pass the bill (<em>although  	his assertions 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/17/where-is-kent-conrad-gett_n_261265.html"> are clearly</a> not backed up by facts</em>).  Representative Jim Cooper  	of Tennessee 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/17/key-blue-dog-democrat-pus_n_261645.html"> has also jumped on</a> the vaguely-defined &#8220;<em>co-op bandwagon</em>.&#8221;   	And of course&#8230;there&#8217;s Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle&#8230;not really a &#8220;<em>Blue  	Dog</em>,&#8221; but he might as well be, since he&#8217;s totally 	<a href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/08/17/the-secret-life-of-tom-daschle-moonlighting-for-the-inurance-indutry/"> in the health care industry&#8217;s hip pocket</a>.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Insurance Companies:</span> Duh&#8230;they hate it.  They&#8217;d  	have to lower costs, improve their crappy service, and stop making  	multi-billion dollar profits by cutting sick people off their rolls.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Republicans:</span> Senator Grassley has become the poster child  	for GOP obstinacy.  He is supposed to be &#8220;<em>negotiating</em>&#8221; with  	Democrats in the Senate&#8230;but he insists on spreading clear falsehoods about  	the bill, then calls Obama and Pelosi &#8220;<strong>intellectually dishonest,</strong>&#8221; and  	then essentially admits 	<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/despite-being-wooed-by-ob_n_258347.html"> that he won&#8217;t vote for the plan</a> <strong>NO MATTER WHAT</strong> is conceded by  	Democrats.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">NEW GROUP -- Co-op Advocates:</span> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/health/policy/18plan.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=But%20it%20took%20us%20over%2030%20years%20to%20get%20where%20we%20are%20today&amp;st=cse"> Nobody really knows what they are</a>&#8230;how they work&#8230;if they work&#8230;if it  	would be government-run or non-profit&#8230;how many people would need to be in  	it for it to be able to compete.  But not knowing any of the details or  	facts hasn&#8217;t stopped health care reform opponents before!  <strong>IRONY  	ALERT:</strong> It is odd&#8230;so many oppose the &#8220;<em>public option</em>&#8221;  	because they see it as a form of &#8220;<em>socialism</em>,&#8221; and some of these same  	people are now shouting &#8220;<em>what about co-ops!</em>&#8220;  Perhaps they don&#8217;t  	realize that co-ops&#8230;collectives&#8230;unions&#8230;are actually elements of,  	&lt;&lt;gasp&gt;&gt;, <strong>COMMUNISM</strong>.  Ooops&#8230;</li>
<li>And&#8230;a minority of people in the United States:</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>WHAT ARE ITS CHANCES:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Good question&#8230;and depending on who you listen to, its chances range  	from &#8220;<em>dead certain to be included</em>&#8221; to &#8220;<em>no way, no how, no chance</em>.&#8221;   	I guess we&#8217;ll just all have to wait and see&#8230;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-public-option-a-look-at-defenders-opponents-and-its-chances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama Beer Summit: Analysis of Beer Selections</title>
		<link>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-obama-beer-summit-analysis-of-beer-selections/</link>
		<comments>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-obama-beer-summit-analysis-of-beer-selections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBartine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beer Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buckler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bud Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Louis Gates Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Adams Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergeant James Crowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityliberationfront.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While watching the Obama "Beer Summit" unfold, a comment about which beers each man had selected left me strangely intrigued...so just for laughs, I present my very own tongue-in-cheek psychoanalysis regarding what each attendees choice of beverage...says about the drinker.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On most Fridays, I choose to publish our &#8220;<em>Chaos Theory</em>&#8221; edition of the  RLF Blog&#8230;where I compile all the leftover stories from the previous week.   But in honor of the historic &#8220;<em>Beer Summit</em>&#8221; which took place at the White  House yesterday afternoon, I thought we&#8217;d have a little fun.</p>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> For those who have been paying attention to more  weighty news topics (<em>or who haven&#8217;t been paying attention at all</em>), here  is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">a quick timeline of events:</span> Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates  Jr. (<em>who happens to be black</em>) is locked out of his house&#8230;he and his  driver break into his home&#8230;a concerned neighbor, fearing a burglary might be  taking place, calls 911&#8230;police arrive and Sergeant James Crowley (<em>who  happens to be white</em>) radios that the &#8220;<em>intruder</em>&#8221; claims to be the  owner of the home and is being a bit &#8220;<strong>uncooperative</strong>&#8220;&#8230;Crowley verifies  Gates&#8217; ID and that he does indeed own the home&#8230;Crowley arrests Gates for  disorderly conduct and claims in his report that he performed the arrest because  Gates was &#8220;<strong>yelling</strong>&#8221; at him&#8230;Gates accuses the Cambridge police and  Crowley of &#8220;<em>racial profiling</em>&#8220;&#8230;the Cambridge police drop all charges  against Gates&#8230;President Obama (<em>who it just so happens, like Gates, is black</em>)  says on television that he&#8217;s unsure if race was an issue, but that he thinks the  police behaved &#8220;<strong>stupidly</strong>&#8220;&#8230;conservative pundits fill the airwaves with  accusations that Obama hates police <span style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> white people&#8230;Obama offers for  all the men to sit down at the White House and talk over a beer&#8230;the &#8220;<em>Beer  Summit</em>&#8221; <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/30/beer-summit-details_n_248261.html"> is held at a table on the White House lawn.</a></p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0No8LEiFlcM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0No8LEiFlcM&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0No8LEiFlcM">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0No8LEiFlcM</a></p></p>
<p>While watching this news item unfold, a comment about which beers each man  had selected left me strangely intrigued&#8230;so just for laughs, I present my very  own tongue-in-cheek psychoanalysis regarding what each attendees choice of  beverage&#8230;says about the man:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PRESIDENT OBAMA:</strong></span></p>
<p>Choice of Beer: <strong>Bud Light</strong></p>
<p>A safe choice&#8230;so all-American, even its label is red, white, and blue.   Based in St. Louis, this American-style lager (<em>I believe Europeans call it  &#8220;flavorless piss-water&#8221;</em>), Bud Light is one of the most popular beers in the  United States which, again makes it a fairly safe political choice&#8230;especially  for those who are trying to avoid looking &#8220;<em>elitist</em>.&#8221;  It has 5.0%  alcohol by volume (<em>which is another cause for its derision from our European  friends</em>).  It&#8217;s not the most exciting beer&#8230;hell, it&#8217;s not even the  most exciting Budweiser beer.  Many who drink the beer may believe it gives  them the appearance of being &#8220;<em>hard-working, blue-collar Americans</em>&#8220;&#8230;when  really it simply begs the question:  <strong>have you tried any other beers?</strong> Flavorless, bland, unlikely to show you a good time&#8230;these might describe both  beer and drinker.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:</strong></span></p>
<p>Choice of Beer: <strong>Buckler Non-Alcoholic Beer</strong></p>
<p>Buckler is brewed by Heineken as a &#8220;<em>low-alcohol</em>&#8221; drink (0.5% abv) that  they call a &#8220;<em>pale lager.</em>&#8220;  <strong>NEWS FLASH:</strong> they&#8217;re  right&#8230;it&#8217;s very pale&#8230;but does not deserve to be termed a &#8220;<em>lager</em>.&#8221;   According to reports, Joe Biden has never had a single drink, which is really  the only way to explain someone asking for Buckler.  While, I admire his  dedication to sobriety (<em>I mean, I guess I do&#8230;</em>), his choice of an  non-alcoholic beer can only mean one thing:  he&#8217;s a <em>follower</em>, highly  susceptible to peer pressure.  <strong>Seriously:</strong> they&#8217;re holding a &#8220;<em>Beer  Summit</em>&#8220;&#8230;and you don&#8217;t drink&#8230;so you bring some vile non-alcoholic  crap/beer?  It would be more admirable if he had just had a cup of coffee,  an iced tea, or whatever drink he would prefer to have&#8230;because there&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> nobody</span> who would prefer to have a Bucklers.  Really&#8230;<strong>NOBODY</strong>.   I won&#8217;t comment on flavor, bouquet, and finish&#8230;if your drinking this &#8220;<em>beer</em>,&#8221;  you don&#8217;t care about any of these things.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PROFESSOR GATES:</strong></span></p>
<p>Choice of Beer: <strong>Sam Adams Light</strong></p>
<p>Sam Adams Light is a lager (4.9% abv) brewed by the Boston Beer Company, who  named it after the famous patriot, Sam Adams, who was rumored to be a brewer.   Adams is <strong>ALSO</strong> rumored to be spinning in his grave and muttering  obscenities about these &#8220;<em>beers</em>&#8221; that he had absolutely nothing to with,  and that he should not be blamed for.  The Boston Beer Company utilizes  what, in the beer industry, is termed a &#8220;<em>sh-t ton</em>&#8221; of hops, which makes  their beer so mercilessly bitter that its drinkers wear the fact that they can  stomach it like a badge of honor, like completing Navy Seal training, or  surviving a snake bite.  In addition, they put out a new, ridiculous flavor  every ten minutes&#8230;ah, I see they just released &#8220;<em>Sam Adams Bubblegum Pilsner</em>.&#8221;  <strong><em>Yummy</em></strong>.  What does this say about Gates?  <strong>He doesn&#8217;t  drink beer</strong>&#8230;but he does watch a lot of TV.  I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s seen the Sam  Adams advertisements that run during commercial breaks on every show, on every  network.  Perhaps he mistakenly assumed that the beer must be very popular  and satisfying, since it is on TV so often&#8230;so when asked, he thought, &#8220;<em>I&#8217;ll  have one of those.</em>&#8220;  You&#8217;re a professor, dammit&#8230;next time do the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> research</span>.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>SERGEANT CROWLEY:</strong></span></p>
<p>Choice of Beer: <strong>Blue Moon, <em>served with an orange slice</em></strong></p>
<p>Blue Moon is a Belgian-Style witbier (<em>&#8220;wheat beer&#8221; to us yanks</em>) brewed  by the Molson Coors Brewing Company in Toronto, Ontario.  It&#8217;s an amber  beer which appears cloudy (<em>because it is unfiltered</em>) and it has a  slightly higher amount of alcohol by volume (5.4%). It is flavored with  coriander and orange peel, it is most often served with a slice of orange.   For an American beer pretending to be a European beer&#8230;it&#8217;s actually not half  bad.  The selection shows Crowley knew what he was doing&#8230;when asked, he  chose a slightly more expense, vastly more flavorful, beer&#8230;with slightly more  alcohol in it.  He wasn&#8217;t afraid to ask for it, and wasn&#8217;t afraid to be  seen drinking a beer that has a somewhat fru-fru orange slice hanging off of it.  <em>Way to go, tough guy</em>.</p>
<p>If it were me&#8230;here&#8217;s what I would have recommended to the four men:</p>
<p><strong>OBAMA: </strong>Try Alpha King Pale Ale.  It&#8217;s American, has &#8220;<em>alpha</em>&#8221;  and &#8220;<em>king</em>&#8221; in the name, has a fantastic flavor&#8230;and 6% abv.  You  look like one seriously regal, big dog, beer drinker just holding the bottle.</p>
<p><strong>BIDEN: </strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Give it up</span>.  I don&#8217;t care if you drink a  fruit smootie&#8230;just leave the &#8220;<em>near beers</em>&#8221; to the guys trying to pretend  they&#8217;ve conquered their alcoholism.</p>
<p><strong>GATES: </strong>You had the right idea choosing a Boston-brewed  beer&#8230;now drink one that won&#8217;t make you feel like you&#8217;ve been sucking on a  Brussels sprout.  Harpoon IPA -- brewed in Boston, 5.9% abv, with a  pine/melon-ish flavor and a malty finish.</p>
<p><strong>CROWLEY: </strong>You like a good Belgian-style wheat beer&#8230;try  Hoegaarden.  Only 4.9% abv, but a nearly perfect wheat beer flavor, and a  surprisingly smooth finish.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll leave you with David Letterman&#8230;and the &#8220;<em>Top Ten Things  Overheard at the White House Beer Summit</em>&#8220;&#8230;have a great weekend:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/U_AjybtHYXI&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/U_AjybtHYXI&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0?rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_AjybtHYXI">www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_AjybtHYXI</a></p></p>
<p>Happy drinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realityliberationfront.com/the-obama-beer-summit-analysis-of-beer-selections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

